Home blood pressure-lowering effect of esaxerenone versus trichlormethiazide for uncontrolled hypertension: a predefined subanalysis of the EXCITE-HT randomized controlled trial by basal calcium channel blocker versus angiotensin receptor blocker.

This prespecified subanalysis of the multicenter, randomized, open-label, parallel-group EXCITE-HT study aimed to examine the non-inferiority of esaxerenone to trichlormethiazide as a second-line antihypertensive agent according to the basal antihypertensive agent used (angiotensin receptor blocker [ARB] or calcium channel blocker [CCB]). The primary endpoint, change in morning home systolic/diastolic blood pressure (SBP/DBP) from baseline to end of treatment was similar between the two groups (intergroup difference in least squares mean change [95% confidence interval]: -1.3 [-3.8, 1.3]/-0.2 [-1.6, 1.3] mmHg for ARB; -2.7 [-4.2, -1.2]/-0.8 [-1.7, 0.1] mmHg for CCB). The respective incidences of serum potassium levels <3.5 mEq/L and ≥5.5 mEq/L in the ARB subgroup were 3.4% and 4.2% for esaxerenone and 7.9% and 0% for trichlormethiazide; in the CCB subgroup, they were 2.8% and 0.6% for esaxerenone and 13.9% and 1.2% for trichlormethiazide, respectively. The incidence of uric acid level ≥7.0 mg/dL was numerically higher in the trichlormethiazide group than the esaxerenone group in both the ARB and CCB subgroups. The non-inferiority of esaxerenone to trichlormethiazide in lowering morning home BP was demonstrated regardless of whether the basal antihypertensive agent was an ARB or CCB. Esaxerenone with a CCB showed superiority to trichlormethiazide in lowering SBP, without any new safety concerns. Serum potassium levels tended to be higher when esaxerenone was combined with an ARB than with a CCB, but this can be mitigated if administered according to the package insert. A subgroup analysis of the EXCITE-HT study according to basal antihypertensive agent demonstrated the non-inferiority of esaxerenone to trichlormethiazide in lowering morning home BP regardless irrespective of the basal antihypertensive agent. Esaxerenone with a CCB showed superiority to trichlormethiazide in lowering SBP, without any new safety concerns.

Association of the protective effect of telmisartan on hearing loss among patients with hypertension.

Aim: Hearing loss, affecting a significant portion of the global population, is prevented with peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ agonism. Understanding potential protective treatments is crucial for public health. We examine the effect of telmisartan, an antihypertensive drug and partial peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ agonist, on hearing loss in patients with hypertension. Method and results: This retrospective cohort analysis used data from the OMOP Common Data Model database, encompassing information from three tertiary institutions in South Korea. The study included a substantial sample size of 860,103 people diagnosed with hypertension. The study included individuals who had been medically diagnosed with hypertension and had been prescribed antihypertensive drugs, including telmisartan. The study design was established to evaluate the comparative effects of telmisartan and other hypertension medications on hearing loss. We used propensity score matching (PSM) to create a balanced cohort, reducing potential biases between the telmisartan and non-telmisartan groups. From the initial 860,103 patients with hypertension, a propensity score matched cohort was derived from 20,010 patients, with 2,193 in the telmisartan group. After PSM, lower incidence of total hearing loss was observed in the telmisartan group compared to the non-telmisartan group during the 3-year follow-up (0.5% vs. 1.5%, log-rank p = 0.005). In subgroup analysis, this study showed consistent results that lower incidence of total hearing loss was higher in the telmisartan group than in the non-telmisartan group. Conclusion: Telmisartan was associated with reducing certain types of hearing loss in patients with hypertension. Further research is needed to confirm these findings and understand the mechanisms.

Antihypertensive medications and dementia in older adults with hypertension.

Background: Studies on middle-aged or individuals with cognitive or cardiovascular impairments, have established that intensive blood pressure (BP) control reduces cognitive decline risk. However, uncertainty exists on differential effects between antihypertensive medications (AHM) classes on this risk, independent of BP-lowering efficacy, particularly in community-dwelling hypertensive older adults. Methods: A post-hoc analysis of the ASPREE study, a randomized trial of low-dose aspirin in adults aged 70+ years (65+ if US minorities) without baseline dementia, and followed for two years post-trial. Cox proportional-hazards regression models were used to estimate associations between baseline and time-varying AHM exposure and incident dementia (an adjudicated primary trial endpoint), in participants with baseline hypertension. Subgroup analyses included prespecified factors, APO ε4 carrier status and monotherapy AHM use. Results: Most hypertensive participants (9,843/13,916; 70.7%) used AHMs. Overall, 'any' AHM use was not associated with lower incident dementia risk, compared with untreated participants (HR 0.84, 95%CI 0.70-1.02, p=0.08), but risk was decreased when angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) were included (HR 0.73, 95%CI 0.59-0.92, p=0.007). ARBs and ß-blockers decreased dementia risk, whereas angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and diuretics increased risk. There was no association with RAS modulating or blood-brain-barrier crossing AHMs on dementia risk. Conclusions: Overall, AHM exposure in hypertensive older adults was not associated with decreased dementia risk, however, specific AHM classes were with risk direction determined by class; ARBs and ß-blockers were superior to ACEIs and other classes in decreasing risk. Our findings emphasize the importance of considering effects beyond BP-lowering efficacy when choosing AHM in older adults.

Stimulation of Angiotensin II Receptor Subtype 2 Reduces Preeclampsia-like Symptoms in a Mouse Model of Preeclampsia.

Angiotensin II (AngII) receptor subtype 1 (AT1R) is involved in the pathogenesis of preeclampsia (PE). Angiotensin II receptor subtype 2 (AT2R) can antagonize the effects of AT1R, but its effects during pregnancy are not known. We investigated the effect of AT2R on the pathogenesis of PE using a mouse model and recently developed AT2R agonist (compound 21 [C21]). Blastocysts collected from pregnant imprinting control region (ICR) mice were incubated with adenovirus containing the CD40L gene and transferred into the uterine horns of pseudo-pregnant ICR mice to express PE-like features. Osmotic pumps were placed subcutaneously on the dorsal side with C21 or saline. C21 reduced the plasma soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase 1 (sFlt-1) concentration, ameliorating hypertension. The splenic T and B cell profiles in model mice were analyzed by flow cytometry. The gated percentage of IFN-γ-positive Th cells was significantly increased and the percentage of plasma cells in B cells was significantly decreased; however, the percentages were not altered by C21. sFlt-1 and soluble endoglin concentrations in plasma were measured with an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, and sFlt-1 was reduced. C21 could become a candidate PE drug as it ameliorated the pathophysiology of PE as a result of decreased production of sFlt-1.

Efficacy of sacubitril-valsartan vs. angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers in preventing atrial fibrillation recurrence after catheter ablation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Patients who have undergone catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) may experience recurrence of this condition. The efficacy of sacubitril-valsartan (S/V) in preventing AF recurrence compared with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) or angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) is not established. This meta-analysis aimed to establish the best therapeutic choice for preventing AF recurrence after catheter ablation. METHOD: A systematic search of the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases was conducted for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies comparing the use of S/V with ACEI/ARB in patients who underwent catheter ablation. Results are presented as mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence interval (CI). Heterogeneity was assessed with the I2 statistic, and outcomes are expressed as relative risk (RR). R software version 4.2.3 was used for the analysis. RESULTS: Three RCTs and one cohort study, comprising 642 patients with 319 patients in the S/V group and 323 in the control group, were included. Follow-up ranged from 6 to 36 months, with mean ages ranging from 58.9 to 65.8 years. A significant reduction in persistent AF occurrence was demonstrated favoring the S/V group (RR: 0.54; 95% CI: [0.41, 0.70]; p = 0.000004; I2: 80%) over the ACEI/ARB group. There was no significant difference in left ventricular ejection fraction with S/V use (MD: 1.23; 95% CI: [-0.12, 2.60]; p = 0.076; I2: 0%) compared with ACEI/ARB. The analysis also showed a significant reduction in left atrial volume index (MD: -5.33; 95% CI: [-8.76, -1.90]; p = 0.002; I2: 57%) in the S/V group compared with the ACEI/ARB group. CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis demonstrated the efficacy of S/V in reducing the incidence of AF in patients undergoing catheter ablation compared with the use of ACEI/ARB. However, more RCTs are needed for a comprehensive evaluation of its efficacy in reducing AF recurrence after catheter ablation in clinical practice.

Looking for the ideal medication for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: a narrative review.

The main goals of the pharmacological treatment of Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) are the reduction of mortality and the prevention of hospitalizations. However, other outcomes such as improvements in cardiac remodeling and clinical status, functional capacity and quality of life, should be taken into account. Also, given the significant inter-individual and intra-individual variability of HF, and the fact that patients usually present with comorbidities, an appropriate treatment for HFrEF should exert a clinical benefit in most patient profiles irrespective of their characteristics or the presence of comorbidities, while providing organ protection beyond the cardiovascular system. The aim of this narrative review is to determine which are the proven effects of the guideline-directed treatments for HFrEF on five key clinical outcomes: cardiovascular mortality and hospitalization due to HF, sudden death, reverse cardiac remodeling, renal protection and evidence in hospitalized patients. Publications that fulfilled the pre-established selection criteria were selected and reviewed. Renin-angiotensin system (RAS) inhibitors, namely angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACE-I) and angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) or angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitors (ARNI), beta-blockers (BB), mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRA), sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) show a benefit in terms of mortality and hospitalization rates. ARNI, BB, and MRA have demonstrated a significant positive effect on the incidence of sudden death. ARB, ARNI, BB and SGLT2i have been associated with clear benefits in reverse cardiac remodeling. Additionally, there is consistent evidence of renal protection from ARB, ARNI, and SGLT2i in renal protection and of benefits for hospitalized patients from ARNI and SGLT2i. In conclusion, the combination of drugs that gather most beneficial effects in HFrEF, beyond cardiovascular mortality and hospitalization, would be ideally pursued.

Renin-Angiotensin System Genes Polymorphisms in Patients With COVID-19 and Its Relation to Severe Cases of SARS-CoV-2 Infection.

Background: Different variants of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of angiotensinogen (AGT), angiotensin-converting enzyme type 1 (ACE1), and angiotensin II receptors type 1 (AGTR1) and 2 (AGTR2) genes determine different susceptibility to cardiovascular disease (CVD) and hypertension, which can be considered as risk factors for fatal outcomes among coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients. The objective of our study was to assess the relation between the frequency of SNPs of the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) components, and the severity of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection. Methods: The cross-sectional study included 100 patients with a laboratory-confirmed diagnosis of COVID-19 admitted to the hospital. Criteria for severe COVID-19 included respiratory rate (RR) > 30/min, blood oxygen saturation (SpO2) ≤ 93%, signs of unstable hemodynamics with systolic blood pressure (SBP) < 90 and/or diastolic blood pressure (DBP) < 60 mm Hg. All patients were identified with alleles and genotypes of the polymorphic markers rs4762 of the AGT gene, rs1799752 of the ACE1 gene, rs5186 of the AGTR1 gene and rs1403543 of the AGTR2 gene using the polymerase chain reaction method in human DNA preparations on real-time CFX96C1000 Touch, Bio-Rad equipment (Syntol, Russia). Statistical analysis was performed in R v.4.2. Results: Patients were divided into groups with severe (n = 44) and moderate COVID-19 (n = 56). For ACE1 rs1799752, a significant deviation from the population distribution was detected in both studied subgroups. A higher frequency of the C allele SNP rs5186 AGTR1 gene was detected in the group with severe disease. More frequent A/A genotype of SNP rs1403543 AGTR2 was detected among females with severe COVID-19. Haplotype analysis revealed more common DCG haplotype among patients with severe COVID-19. The odds ratio for severe COVID-19 in the presence of the DCG haplotype was 3.996 (95% confidential interval: 1.080 -14.791, P < 0.05). Conclusions: Our data suggest that the SNP genes of the RAS components, may allow to identify groups of patients predisposed to a more severe course of COVID-19.

Pharmacogenetics of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) and angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARB) in cardiovascular diseases.

Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) have a high mortality rate, and despite the several available therapeutic targets, non-response to antihypertensives remains a common problem. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) are important classes of drugs recommended as first-line therapy for several CVDs. However, response to ACEIs and ARBs varies among treated patients. Pharmacogenomics assesses how an individual's genetic characteristics affect their likely response to drug therapy. Currently, numerous studies suggest that genetic polymorphisms may contribute to variability in drug response. Moreover, further studies evaluating gene-gene interactions within signaling pathways in response to antihypertensives might help to unravel potential genetic predictors for antihypertensive response. This review summarizes the pharmacogenetic data for ACEIs and ARBs in patients with CVD, and discusses the potential pharmacogenetics of these classes of antihypertensives in clinical practice. However, replication studies in different populations are needed. In addition, studies that evaluate gene-gene interactions that share signaling pathways in the response to antihypertensive drugs might facilitate the discovery of genetic predictors for antihypertensive response.

Post-acute CoVid-19 syndrome (PACS) linked cardiovascular symptoms.

Officials have marked the end of the CoVid-19 pandemic, yet we continue to learn more about the SARS-CoV2 virus itself and its lasting multidimensional effects after acute infection. Long COVID, or the post-acute CoViD-19 syndrome (PACS), manifests as a wide range of prolonged physical, mental, and emotional symptoms over at least 1 to 12 months after SARS-CoV2 infection. Here, we describe certain pervasive clinical consequences of PACS on the cardiovascular system, and insight on the potentially improved prognoses in heart failure patients.

Effects of Cardioprotective Drugs on 90-Day Mortality or Heart Transplantation in Patients With Fulminant Myocarditis.

Background: Cardioprotective drugs have not been previously shown to improve the prognosis in patients with fulminant myocarditis presentation (FMP). We aimed to investigate whether cardioprotective drugs, including angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI)/angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB) and ß-blocker, administered during hospitalization improved the prognosis in patients with FMP. Methods and Results: This multicenter cohort study conducted in Japan included 755 patients with clinically diagnosed FMP. Those who died within 14 days of admission were excluded, and 588 patients (median age 53 [37-65] years and 40% female) were evaluated. The primary outcome was the composite of 90-day mortality or heart transplantation. The patients were divided into 4 groups according to whether they were administered ACEI/ARB or ß-blocker during hospitalization. Administration of ACEI/ARB without ß-blocker improved the overall patient outcomes (log-rank test [vs. ACEI/ARB - and ß-blocker -]: ACEI/ARB + and ß-blocker -, P<0.001; ACEI/ARB - and ß-blocker +, P=0.256). Subsequently, a matched cohort of 146 patient pairs was generated for patients with or without ACEI/ARB administration during hospitalization. The outcome-free survival at 90 days was significantly higher in the ACEI/ARB administration group than in the non-administration group (hazard ratio 0.37; 95% confidence interval 0.19-0.71). Conclusions: Administration of ACEI or ARB during hospitalization was associated with favorable outcomes in terms of 90-day mortality and heart transplantation events in patients with clinically diagnosed FMP.

Association of ACE and AGTR1 variants with retinopathy of prematurity: a case-control study and meta-analysis.

Retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) is a major cause of childhood blindness worldwide, linked to gene variants in the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system, including angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) and angiotensin II receptor type 1 (AGTR1). This study aims to evaluate the association between ACE insertion/deletion (I/D) and AGTR1 rs5186A > C variants with the occurrence and progression of ROP in a Polish cohort. A total of 377 premature infants were enrolled in the study. The ACE variant was evaluated using PCR, and AGTR1 was assessed using TaqMan probes. Clinical characteristics, including risk factors and comorbidities, were documented. A meta-analysis of the effects of the studied variants on ROP was also conducted. The AGTR1 rs5186C allele was significantly associated with both the progression of ROP and treatment outcomes. Homozygotes exhibited a 2.47-fold increased risk of developing proliferative ROP and a 4.82-fold increased risk of treatment failure. The impact of this allele increased at low birth weight. A meta-analysis, including 191 cases and 1661 controls, indicated an overall risk of 1.7 (95%CI 1.02-2.84) for the recessive effect of the rs5186C allele. The ACE variant did not show a significant association with ROP in our population; however, a meta-analysis of 996 cases and 2787 controls suggested a recessive effect of the insertion allele (an odds ratio of 1.21 (95%CI 1.00-1.60)). These results indicate that gain-of-function AGTR1 variants may play a crucial role in the development of ROP, potentially by promoting angiogenesis and pro-inflammatory effects. Screening for these variants could facilitate the development of personalized risk assessment and treatment strategies for ROP.

Angiotensin Receptor Blockers Versus Angiotensin Converting Enzyme Inhibitors in Acute Myocardial Infarction Without Heart Failure.

BACKGROUND: Whether angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) can be an alternative to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) in patients without heart failure (HF) after acute myocardial infarction (MI) remains controversial. The aim of this study was to compare clinical outcomes between initial ARB and ACEI therapy in patients with MI without HF. METHODS: Between 2010 and 2016, a total of 31,013 patients who underwent coronary revascularization for MI with prescription of ARBs or ACEIs at hospital discharge were enrolled from the Korean nationwide medical insurance data. Patients who had HF at index MI were excluded. The primary outcome was all-cause death. The secondary outcomes included recurrent MI, hospitalization for new heart HF, stroke, and a composite of each outcome. RESULTS: Of 31,013 patients, ARBs were prescribed in 12,685 (40.9%) and ACEIs in 18,328 (59.1%). Patients receiving ARBs had a lower discontinuation rate compared with those receiving ACEIs (28.2% vs 43.5%, adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 0.34; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.31-0.37; P < .01). During a median follow-up of 2.2 years, 2480 patients died. The incidence rate of all-cause death in patients receiving ARBs and those receiving ACEIs was 27.7 and 22.9 per 1000 person-years, respectively (adjusted HR 1.04; 95% CI 0.95-1.13; P = .40). There were no significant differences in the secondary outcomes between patients receiving ARBs and those receiving ACEIs, except stroke (19.2 vs 13.6 per 1000 person-years; adjusted HR 1.17; 95% CI 1.04-1.32; P = .01). In a subgroup analysis, a higher mortality was observed with ARBs compared with ACEIs in patients with diabetes. CONCLUSIONS: In this nationwide cohort, there was no significant difference in the incidence of all-cause death between ARBs and ACEIs as discharge medications in patients with myocardial infarction without heart failure. Angiotensin II receptor blockers would be an alternative to ACEIs for those intolerant to ACEI therapy.

Hyponatremia in geriatric patients.

Hyponatremia is the most frequent electrolyte imbalance in geriatric medicine. Causes of hyponatremia were retrospectively analyzed in all in-patients treated in 2016 (N = 2267, 1564 women, 703 men, mean age ± standard deviation 81.9 ± 7.6 years). Any form of hyponatremia on admission, during the stay or on discharge was noted in 308 patients (13.6%, 231 women, 77 men; mean age ± standard deviation 83.1 ± 7.3 years, p = 0.009 vs. age of all patients). Women had a higher probability of developing hyponatremia compared to men (p = 0.019), 131 patients were hypovolemic, and dyspnea as an indicator of hypervolemia was noted in 71 patients.Only 12 patients suffering from hyponatremia (3.9%) did not receive any of the potentially sodium-lowering drugs assessed (diuretics, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin II receptor antagonists, antidepressants, neuroleptics, nonsteroidal antirheumatics, carbamazepine, oxcarbazepine). The median number of drugs per patient potentially lowering the plasma sodium level was 3 and the maximum number was 7.Hypovolemic hyponatremia and the syndrome of inadequate antidiuretic hormone secretion were the most important causes of hyponatremia. Adverse drug effects were the main origins of both conditions. In patients with hyponatremia the drug load influencing plasma sodium level should be minimized, thiazide diuretics should be avoided and older individuals should receive a diet with sufficient salt content.

Dataset for discovering new hypertension small molecules using machine learning-aided computational fragment-based design.

This dataset demonstrates the use of computational fragmentation-based and machine learning-aided drug discovery to generate new lead molecules for the treatment of hypertension. Specifically, the focus is on agents targeting the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS), commonly classified as Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors (ACEIs) and Angiotensin II Receptor Blockers (ARBs). The preliminary dataset was a target-specific, user-generated fragment library of 63 molecular fragments of the 26 approved ACEI and ARB molecules obtained from the ChEMBL and DrugBank molecular databases. This fragment library provided the primary input dataset to generate the new lead molecules presented in the dataset. The newly generated molecules were screened to check whether they met the criteria for oral drugs and comprised the ACEI or ARB core functional group criterion. Using unsupervised machine learning, the molecules that met the criterion were divided into clusters of drug classes based on their functional group allocation. This process led to three final output datasets, one containing the new ACEI molecules, another for the new ARB molecules, and the last for the new unassigned class molecules. This data can aid in the timely and efficient design of novel antihypertensive drugs. It can also be used in precision hypertension medicine for patients with treatment resistance, non-response or co-morbidities. Although this dataset is specific to antihypertensive agents, the model can be reused with minimal changes to produce new lead molecules for other health conditions.

Efficacy and safety of dual renin-angiotensin system (RAS) blockade for non-elderly diabetic kidney disease patients with preserved eGFR.

AIM: Although sodium glucose cotransporter2 inhibitor (SGLT-2I) is widely used in clinical practice, sufficient renin-angiotensin system (RAS) inhibition remains the cornerstone of diabetic kidney disease (DKD) treatment. The aim of this single-center study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of dual RAS blockade compared with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI)/angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB) monotherapy in non-elderly DKD patients with preserved eGFR (WHO Standard, < 60y). METHODS: This single-center study was registered in Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR1900024752), and approved by the ethical committee (KY201994). In this study, we recruited non-elderly type 2 diabetes volunteers with initial diagnosis of DKD to receive dual RAS blockade or monotherapy. 150 non-elderly DKD patients with preserved eGFR were recruited. The patients were randomly divided into dual RAS blockade group and monotherapy group. The dual RAS blockade group treatment regimen was an 80 mg valsartan plus a 4 mg perindopril tert-butylamine per day. At the same time, monotherapy group patients who received the 8 mg perindopril tert-butylamine or 160 mg valsartan monotherapy. The clinical data of the three groups were compared at baseline and collected during the follow-up period of 12 months. RESULTS: The baseline of patients who received dual RAS blockade was similar to that of monotherapy group. After 12 months of treatment, the median level of proteinuria in the dual RAS blockade group was significantly lower than that in the monotherapy group. There was no significant difference in the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) level, potassium, blood pressure and no serious adverse reactions. CONCLUSIONS: In non-elderly DKD patients with preserved eGFR, dual RAS blockade is superior to control proteinuria, and does not increase the probability of adverse reactions such as hyperkalemia, hypotension and acute kidney injury in 12 months.

Efficacy and safety of azilsartan medoxomil in the treatment of hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background: Angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) are utilized for the management of hypertension and diabetes. Previous meta-analyses suggested that azilsartan medoxomil (AZL-M) improved blood pressure (BP) reduction, but there were no safety findings or suggestions for patients with hypertension or diabetes. Methods: We performed an efficacy and safety meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating AZL-M therapy for reducing BP in patients with hypertension. Patients with hypertension complicated by diabetes were analyzed. The relevant literature was searched in English and Chinese databases for RCTs involving AZL-M in hypertension. Efficacy variables included the change from baseline in the 24-h mean systolic/diastolic BP measured by ambulatory BP monitoring, the change from baseline in clinic systolic/diastolic BP, and responder rates. Safety variables included total adverse events (AEs), serious AEs, AEs leading to discontinuation, and AEs related to the study drug. The raw data from the included studies were utilized to calculate the odds ratio (OR) for dichotomous data and the mean difference (MD) for continuous data, accompanied by 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Statistical analysis was performed using R software. Results: A total of 11 RCTs met the inclusion criteria, representing 7,608 patients, 5 of whom had diabetes. Pooled analysis suggested a reduction in BP among patients randomized to 40 mg of AZL-M vs. control therapy [24-h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) mean systolic blood pressure (SBP) (MD: -2.85 mmHg), clinic SBP (MD: -3.48 mmHg), and clinic diastolic blood pressure (DBP) (MD: -1.96 mmHg)] and for 80 mg of AZL-M vs. control therapy [24-h ABPM mean SBP (MD: -3.59 mmHg), 24-h ABPM mean DBP (MD: -2.62 mmHg), clinic SBP (MD: -4.42 mmHg), clinic DBP (MD: -3.09 mmHg), and responder rate (OR: 1.46)]. There was no difference in the reduction of risks, except for dizziness (OR: 1.56) in the 80-mg AZL-M group or urinary tract infection (OR: 1.82) in the 40-mg AZL-M group. Analysis of patients with diabetes revealed that AZL-M can provide superior management, while safety and tolerability were similar to those of control therapy. Conclusions: AZL-M appears to reduce BP to a greater extent than dose-control therapy and does not increase the risk of adverse events in patients with hypertension and diabetes compared with placebo. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?RecordID=464284, identifier PROSPERO CRD42023464284.

Impact of RAAS Receptors and Membrane-Bound Transporter System in the Left Ventricle during the Long-Term Control of Hypertension.

The Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System (RAAS) has been implicated in systemic and neurogenic hypertension. The infusion of RAAS inhibitors blunted arterial pressure and efficacy of use-dependent synaptic transmission in sympathetic ganglia. The current investigation aims to elucidate the impact of RAAS-mediated receptors on left ventricular cardiomyocytes and the role of the sarcolemma-bound carrier system in the heart of the hypertensive transgene model. A significant increase in mRNA and the protein expression for angiotensin II (AngII) receptor subtype-1 (AT1R) was observed in (mREN2)27 transgenic compared to the normotensive rodents. Concurrently, there was an upregulation in AT1R and a downregulation in the MAS1 proto-oncogene protein receptor as well as the AngII subtype-2 receptor in hypertensive rodents. There were modifications in the expressions of sarcolemma Na+-K+-ATPase, Na+-Ca2+ exchanger, and Sarcoendoplasmic Reticulum Calcium ATPase in the transgenic hypertensive model. These observations suggest chronic RAAS activation led to a shift in receptor balance favoring augmented cardiac contractility and disruption in calcium handling through modifications of membrane-bound carrier proteins and blood pressure. The study provides insight into mechanisms underlying RAAS-mediated cardiac dysfunction and highlights the potential value of targeting the protective arm of AngII in hypertension.

Overdose of angiotensin II receptor blocker in the third trimester of pregnancy: A case report.

Angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) are contraindicated during pregnancy because of fetal toxicity. All previous reports on adverse fetal outcomes involved women who continued to take low-dose ARBs for hypertension and were unaware of the adverse effects. Herein, we report the case of a 23-year-old pregnant woman in her third trimester who experienced an ARB overdose after an argument with her partner. Pregnancy was complicated by transient oligohydramnios, and fetal magnetic resonance imaging suggested renal failure. Despite these concerns, the newborn had no morphological abnormalities or abnormal neurological findings. Renal impairment improved over time, and the infant grew well. A single overdose of ARBs in the third trimester can lead to fetal renal failure, similar to long-term low-dose ARB administration; however, favorable outcomes are possible. An overdose of ARBs may transiently cause renal failure, which may improve. The study findings may inform counseling for women who are unexpectedly exposed to an overdose of ARBs.

Effects of ACE inhibitor/ARB therapy and long COVID on kidney disease: a retrospective cohort study using real-world data.

Background: The association between angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) or angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) and severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 susceptibility, particularly via ACE-2 receptor upregulation in the kidneys, raises concerns about potential kidney disease risks in long coronavirus disease (COVID) patients. This study explores the association of ACEI/ARB therapy on acute kidney injury (AKI), chronic kidney disease (CKD) and all-cause mortality in patients with and without long COVID. Methods: A retrospective cohort study using TriNetX datasets was conducted, with diagnoses of long COVID via International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision (ICD-10) codes and prescription for ACEI/ARB as the classification of four cohorts: long COVID ACEI/ARB users (LCAUs), long COVID ACEI/ARB non-users (LCANs), non-long COVID ACEI/ARB users (NLCAUs) and non-long COVID ACEI/ARB non-users (NLCANs). Multivariable stratified Cox proportional hazards regression models assessed the adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) across groups. Additional analyses were conducted, including time-dependent exposure analysis and comparison with an active comparator, calcium channel blockers. Results: Our study included 18 168 long COVID and 181 680 propensity score-matched non-long COVID patients from October 2021 to October 2023. ACEI/ARB use did not significantly affect the risk of AKI or CKD when comparing LCAUs with LCANs and NLCAUs with NLCANs. However, a protective effect against all-cause mortality was observed {aHR 0.79 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.65-0.93]} in the NLCAU group compared with the NLCAN group. Conversely, long COVID was associated with increased risks of CKD [aHR 1.49 (95% CI 1.03-2.14)] and all-cause mortality [aHR 1.49 (95% CI 1.00-2.23)] when comparing LCANs with NLCANs. The additional analyses support the primary findings. Conclusions: ACEI/ARB treatment does not increase the incidence of CKD or AKI, regardless of long COVID status. However, long COVID itself is associated with increasing risks of kidney diseases and all-cause mortality.

Effects of renin-angiotensin system inhibitor and beta-blocker use on mortality in older patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction in Japan.

Introduction: Guideline-directed medical therapy with renin-angiotensin system (RAS) inhibitors and beta-blockers has improved the survival of patients with heart failure (HF) and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (HFrEF). However, it is unclear whether RAS inhibitors and beta-blockers can be administered to older patients with HF. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the effects of beta-blockers and RAS inhibitors on the prognosis of older patients with HFrEF. Methods: Demographic, clinical, and pharmacological data from 1,061 patients with acute decompensated HF, enrolled in the Kochi Registry of Subjects with Acute Decompensated Heart Failure (Kochi YOSACOI study), were analyzed to assess their impact on mortality. Additionally, a machine learning approach was applied to complement the conventional statistical model for analysis. Patients with HFrEF (n = 314) were divided into the all-cause mortality within 2 years group (n = 80) and the survivor group (n = 234). Results: Overall, 41.1% (129/314) of the patients were aged ≥80, and 25.5% (80/314) experienced all-cause mortality within 2 years. Furthermore, 57.6% (181/314) and 79.0% (248/314) were prescribed RAS inhibitors and beta-blockers, respectively. Our analysis showed that RAS inhibitor use was associated with reduced all-cause mortality and cardiac death in patients with HFrEF of all ages (P < 0.001), and beta-blocker use had an interaction with age. Machine learning revealed that the use of beta-blockers altered the risk of mortality, with a threshold of approximately 80 years of age. Beta-blocker use was associated with lower all-cause mortality and cardiac death in patients with HFrEF aged <80 years (P < 0.001) but not in those aged ≥80 years (P = 0.319 and P = 0.246, respectively). These results suggest that beta blockers may differ in their all-cause mortality benefits according to age. Conclusions: RAS inhibitors prevented all-cause mortality and cardiac death at all ages, whereas beta-blockers had different effects depending on the patient's age. This study suggested that the choice of beta-blockers and RAS inhibitors is more important in older patients with HFrEF than in younger patients with the same condition.