Safety and Tolerability of Suprachoroidal Axitinib Injectable Suspension, for Neovascular Age-related Macular Degeneration; Phase I/IIa Open-Label, Dose-Escalation Trial.

Purpose: To evaluate the safety and tolerability of a single dose of axitinib injectable suspension (CLS-AX), a pan-anti-VEGF tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), administered via suprachoroidal injection in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD). Design: Phase I/IIa, open-label, sequential dose escalation. Participants: Anti-VEGF treatment-experienced patients with active subfoveal choroidal neovascularization secondary to nAMD. Methods: The study included 4 cohorts (0.03, 0.10, 0.50, and 1.0 mg) of approximately 5 patients each enrolled in a dose-escalating fashion. Enrolled patients received intravitreal aflibercept (2 mg) followed by a single unilateral dose of CLS-AX 1 month later. All patients were followed monthly for 3 months with the option of an additional 3 months of extended follow-up for cohorts 2 to 4. End points included systemic and ocular safety and tolerability, visual acuity, retinal thickness, and need for aflibercept therapy. Main Outcome Measures: The number of patients reporting treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs), changes in ophthalmic examinations, and the number of patients qualifying for additional therapy for nAMD based on protocol-defined criteria. Results: OASIS enrolled 27 patients with nAMD with mean age of 81 years, mean duration of nAMD diagnosis of 54 months, and between 5 and 90 prior anti-VEGF treatments. Twenty-six patients completed through 3 months, with 14 entering and completing the 3-month extension. No SAEs, drug-related TEAEs, or TEAEs leading to discontinuation were observed after CLS-AX administration; there were no adverse events related to ocular inflammation, vasculitis, intraocular pressure, or dispersion of drug into the vitreous or anterior chamber. Through 6 months, stable mean best-corrected visual acuity and stable mean central subfield thickness (CST) were observed, suggestive of TKI biologic effect. No aflibercept therapy was administered up to 3 months in 58% (15/26) of patients who completed 3 months of follow-up in OASIS. In the Extension, 57% (8/14) of patients went up to 6 months without receiving aflibercept therapy. Conclusions: Up to 1.0 mg CLS-AX, a highly potent TKI targeted to the suprachoroidal space (SCS) via the SCS Microinjector, was well tolerated, with stable mean visual acuity and mean CST. A majority of patients followed for 6 months did not require aflibercept therapy. Financial Disclosures: Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

Understanding Treatment Decisions and Management for Patients with Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma Using Hypothetical Case Studies: A Vodcast.

In recent years, the armamentarium of therapies for the management of advanced renal cell carcinoma (aRCC) has grown. Combination therapies, including immuno-oncology (IO) agents and tyrosine kinase inhibitors [TKIs (IO-TKI)], and IO-IO combinations, are now approved for first-line treatment of aRCC. Decisions regarding the use of these combinations, IO-IO versus IO-TKI, can be challenging, as they have not been compared in a randomized trial; each of these combinations have been compared with sunitinib alone. In addition, patient-, disease-, and treatment-based factors must be evaluated in the decision-making process. More important is the consideration of patient management during treatment and optimal detection and management of toxicities to ensure continued benefit. In this vodcast, two experts in the field of kidney cancer will present case studies that represent typical patients seen in practice. The faculty will discuss treatment approaches, adverse event management, and which factors to consider during the treatment decision-making process. Viewers of the vodcast will get a better understanding of clinical trial outcomes related to an IO-TKI combination, such as axitinib plus pembrolizumab, that they can apply to their practice immediately. In addition, they will gain real-world insight into how experts approach the treatment of patients with aRCC and, more importantly, therapy management.

N-Acetyl-L-Cysteine (NAC) Blunts Axitinib-Related Adverse Effects in Preclinical Models of Glioblastoma.

OBJECTIVE: Axitinib is a tyrosine kinase inhibitor characterized by a strong affinity for Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptors (VEGFRs). It was approved in 2012 by Food and Drug Administration and European Medicines Agency as a second line treatment for advanced renal cell carcinoma and is currently under evaluation in clinical trial for the treatment of other cancers. Glioblastoma IDH-wild type (GBM) is a highly malignant brain tumor characterized by diffusely infiltrative growth pattern and by a prominent neo-angiogenesis. In GBM, axitinib has demonstrated a limited effectiveness as a monotherapy, while it was recently shown to significantly improve its efficacy in combination treatments. In preclinical models, axitinib has been reported to trigger cellular senescence both in tumor as well as in normal cells, through a mechanism involving intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS) accumulation and activation of Ataxia Telangiectasia Mutated kinase (ATM). Limiting axitinib-dependent ROS increase by antioxidants prevents senescence specifically in normal cells, without affecting tumor cells. METHODS: We used brain tumor xenografts obtained by engrafting Glioma Stem Cells (GSCs) into the brain of immunocompromised mice, to investigate the hypothesis that the antioxidant molecule N-Acetyl-L-Cysteine (NAC) might be used to reduce senescence-associated adverse effects of axitinib treatment without altering its anti-tumor activity. RESULTS: We demonstrate that the use of the antioxidant molecule N-Acetyl-Cysteine (NAC) in combination with axitinib stabilizes tumor microvessels in GBM tumor orthotopic xenografts, eventually resulting in vessel normalization, and protects liver vasculature from axitinib-dependent toxicity. CONCLUSION: Overall, we found that NAC co-treatment allows vessel normalization in brain tumor vessels and exerts a protective effect on liver vasculature, therefore minimizing axitinib-dependent toxicity.

Real-world effectiveness of first- and second-line anti-angiogenesis therapy in RCC: analysis of a UK-based population.

Aim: Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is the seventh commonest cancer in the UK, where first-line (1L) sunitinib and second-line (2L) axitinib are treatment options.Methods: Retrospective, non-interventional data from the Christie NHS Foundation Trust (Manchester, UK). The primary end point was median progression-free survival (mPFS).Results: For 1L sunitinib (n = 622) and 2L axitinib (n = 121), mPFS (95% CI) was 8.4 (7.6, 9.9) and 6.2 (4.9, 9.3) months, respectively. In 1L, Karnofsky performance status, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), neutrophils, hemoglobin, time from diagnosis to treatment and age were predictors (p < 0.05) of PFS. In 2L, LDH and platelets were predictors of PFS (p < 0.05).Conclusion: Sunitinib and axitinib were effective treatments for RCC. PFS predictors varied between 1L and 2L; LDH was a predictor for both.Clinical Trial Registration: NCT04033991 (ClinicalTrials.gov).

[Box: see text].

Outcome after treatment with axitinib in children, young adults, and adults with renal cell carcinoma: a narrative review.

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is a very rare type of renal cancer in children and young adults. When metastasized or recurrent, no standards of care are available, and outcome is still poor. The tyrosine kinase inhibitor axitinib is approved for treatment of RCC in adults, but its effects in children and young adults with RCC remains unclear. Due to the histological and biological differences between children and adults, it is difficult to extrapolate knowledge on treatments from the adult to the pediatric and young adult setting. This paper summarizes the clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients with RCC who were treated with axitinib, with the aim to gain insight in the clinical efficacy of this compound in this young patient group.

Design and development of Fujicalin-based axitinib liquisolid compacts for improved dissolution and bioavailability to treat renal cell carcinoma.

Poor dissolution of axitinib (AXT) limits its effectiveness through the oral route. The present study investigated, prospective of liquisolid (LS) technology to improve dissolution rate and oral bioavailability of AXT to treat renal cell carcinoma. LS compacts were fabricated with PEG 200, Fujicalin SG, and Aerosil 200 as solvent, carrier, and coat material, respectively. The behavior of LS-systems during tabletting was investigated using Kawakita, Heckel, and Leuenberger analysis. LS compacts were examined for P-XRD, DSC, SEM, and in vitro drug dissolution. For optimization, a 32 full factorial design was utilized. Cell line A498 was utilized for in vitro cytotoxicity study. A bioavailability study was performed using rabbits. DSC and P-XRD analysis confirmed the transition of crystalline AXT to its partial amorphization and molecular dispersion. Consequently, LS6 demonstrated a significantly rapid drug dissolution (Q20; >99 %) than the directly compressed tablets (18.05 %). Additionally, 2.03-fold increase in oral bioavailability, and inhibited dose-dependent cell growth with 1.75-fold increased apoptosis rate. Overall, an LS6 compact consisting of 15 % AXT concentration in PEG 200 and a 20 w/w ratio of Fujicalin SG: Aerosil 200 exhibited improved formulation properties, enhanced dissolution rate, and bioavailability. Thus developed potential product may contribute low-cost production with patient-improved survival expectations.

Therapeutic Senolysis of Axitinib-Induced Senescent Human Lung Cancer Cells.

BACKGROUND: Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) inhibit receptor-mediated signals in cells. Axitinib is a TKI with high specificity for vascular endothelial growth factor receptors (VEGFRs). AIM: We determined whether axitinib could induce senescence in human cancer cells and be lysed by the senolytic drug ABT-263. METHODS: Human lung and breast adenocarcinoma cell lines were used. These cells were cultured with axitinib or a multi-target TKI lenvatinib. The expression of ß-galactosidase, VEGFRs, Ki-67, reactive oxygen species (ROS) of cancer cells, and their BrdU uptake were evaluated by flow cytometry. The mRNA expression of p21 and IL-8 was examined by quantitative PCR. The effects of TKIs on phosphorylation of Akt and Erk1/2, as downstream molecules of VEGFR signaling, were examined by immunoblot. The in vivo anti-cancer effect was examined using a xenograft mice model. RESULTS: Axitinib, but not lenvatinib, induced cellular senescence (increased cell size and enhanced expression of ß-galactosidase) in all adenocarcinoma cell lines. Axitinib-induced senescence was unrelated to the expression of VEGFRs on cancer cells. ROS were involved in axitinib-induced senescence. Axitinib-induced senescent lung adenocarcinoma A549 cells were drastically lysed by ABT-263. In A549-xenografted mice, combination therapy with axitinib and ABT-263 significantly suppressed tumor growth with the induction of apoptotic cancer cells.

Cabozantinib Induces Isolated Hyperbilirubinemia in Renal Cell Carcinoma Patients carrying the UGT1A1*28 Polymorphism.

BACKGROUND: Genetic variants of UGT1A1, involved in glucuronidation and clearance of bilirubin, are associated with reduced bilirubin metabolization and drug-induced isolated hyperbilirubinemia. We studied the impact of the UGT1A1*28 polymorphism on drug-induced isolated hyperbilirubinemia in metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients treated with pazopanib, cabozantinib, and axitinib. METHODS: We genotyped the UGT1A1*28 TA6/TA6-TA6/TA7-TA7/TA7 polymorphism and correlated with median baseline, on-treatment and peak bilirubin levels during therapy, incidence of grade-1- or -2 (G1/2)-hyperbilirubinemia and time-to-G1-hyperbilirubinemia. RESULTS: Of the 66 patients treated with pazopanib, 29 received axitinib and 28 cabozantinib upon progression. Median baseline bilirubin was higher in TA7/TA7-carriers versus TA6/TA6+TA6/TA7-carriers at start of pazopanib (P < .0001), cabozantinib (P < .0001), and axitinib (P = .007). During pazopanib therapy, median bilirubin increased 1.4-fold in TA7/TA7+TA6/TA7-carriers but not in TA6/TA6-carriers. On cabozantinib, bilirubin increased 1.5-fold in TA7/TA7-carriers but not in TA6/TA6+TA6/TA7-carriers. Axitinib did not increase bilirubin in any genotype. Peak bilirubin in TA7/TA7- versus TA6/TA6+TA6/TA7-carriers was higher on pazopanib (P < .0001) or cabozantinib (P < .0001). With pazopanib, G1-hyperbilirubinemia occurred in 57% of TA7/TA7- and 12% of TA6/TA6+TA6/TA7-carriers (P = .0009) and G2-hyperbilirubinemia in 36% and 6% of the patients, respectively (P = .004). On cabozantinib, G1-hyperbilirubinemia occurred in 100% of TA7/TA7- and 5% of TA6/TA6+TA6/TA7-carriers (P < .0001) and G2-hyperbilirubinemia in 33% and 0% of the patients, respectively (P = .04). On axitinib, no correlation between the genotypes and G1/2-hyperbilirubinemia was observed. CONCLUSION: We validate the previously described impact of the UGT1A1*28 polymorphism on isolated bilirubin increase on pazopanib. We report for the first time that cabozantinib also interferes with UGT1A1 and causes isolated bilirubin increase.

Changes in outcome of patients with advanced non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma from the tyrosine kinase inhibitor era to the immuno-oncology era.

BACKGROUND: The therapeutic benefit of immuno-oncology (IO) therapy for patients with advanced non-clear-cell renal cell carcinoma (nccRCC) remains unclear. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We reviewed clinical data from 93 patients with advanced nccRCC who received first-line systemic therapy including IO combination therapy and tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) monotherapy at our affiliated institutions. Patients were divided based on the period when the treatment was implemented as the standard of care into the IO and TKI eras. Survival and tumor response outcomes were compared between the IO and TKI eras. RESULTS: Of the 93 patients, 50 (54%) and 43 (46%) were categorized as IO era and TKI era groups, respectively. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were significantly longer in the IO era than in the TKI era (median PFS: 8.97 vs. 4.96 months, p = 0.0152; median OS: 38.4 vs. 13.5 months, p = 0.0001). After the adjustment using other covariates, the treatment era was an independent factor for PFS (hazard ratio: 0.59, p = 0.0235) and OS (hazard ratio: 0.27, p < 0.0001). Objective response and disease control rates was not significantly different between the treatment eras (26% vs. 16.3%, p = 0.268; 62% vs. 62.8%, p = 0.594). CONCLUSION: The implementation of IO therapy was significantly associated with longer survival in the nccRCC population. Further studies are needed to establish a more effective treatment strategy in this population using multiple regimens of IO combination therapy.

Axitinib after Treatment Failure with Sunitinib or Cytokines in Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma-Systematic Literature Review of Clinical and Real-World Evidence.

BACKGROUND: We conducted a systematic literature review (SLR) to identify clinical evidence on treatments in advanced renal cell carcinoma (aRCC) after the failure of prior therapy with cytokines, tyrosine kinase inhibitors, or immune checkpoint inhibitors. Herein, we summarise the evidence for axitinib in aRCC after the failure of prior therapy with cytokines or sunitinib. METHODS: This SLR was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42023492931) and followed the 2020 PRISMA statement and the Cochrane guidelines. Comprehensive searches were conducted in MEDLINE and Embase as well as for conference proceedings. Study eligibility was defined according to population, intervention, comparator, outcome, and study design. RESULTS: Of 1252 titles/abstracts screened, 266 peer-reviewed publications were reviewed, of which 182 were included. In addition, 28 conference abstracts were eligible. Data on axitinib were reported in 55 publications, of which 16 provided efficacy and/or safety outcomes on axitinib after therapy with sunitinib or cytokines. In these patients, median progression-free and overall survival ranged between 5.5 and 8.7 months and 11.0 and 69.5 months, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Axitinib is commonly used in clinical practice and has a well-characterised safety and efficacy profile in the treatment of patients with aRCC after the failure of prior therapy with sunitinib or cytokines.

Long-Term Temporal Trends of Real-World Healthcare Costs Associated with Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab and Pembrolizumab Plus Axitinib as First-Line Treatment for Advanced or Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.

INTRODUCTION: Nivolumab plus ipilimumab (NIVO + IPI) and pembrolizumab plus axitinib (PEM + AXI) are first-line (1L) treatments for advanced or metastatic renal cell carcinoma (aRCC), although the long-term trends in their associated real-world healthcare costs are not well defined. We compared the real-world healthcare costs of patients with aRCC who received 1L NIVO + IPI or PEM + AXI over 24 months. METHODS: Adults with RCC and secondary malignancy who initiated 1L NIVO + IPI or PEM + AXI were identified in the Merative MarketScan Commercial and Medicare Supplemental Databases (01/01/2004 to 09/30/2021). All-cause and RCC-related healthcare costs (unadjusted and adjusted) were assessed per patient per month (PPPM) at 6-month intervals post-treatment initiation (index date) up to 24 months, and differences between the NIVO + IPI and PEM + AXI cohorts were compared. RESULTS: Of 325 patients with aRCC, 219 received NIVO + IPI and 106 received PEM + AXI as the 1L treatment. According to patients' follow-up length, the analyses for months 7-12 included 210 patients in the NIVO + IPI cohort and 103 in the PEM + AXI cohort; months 13-18 included 119 and 48 patients, respectively; and months 19-24 included 81 and 25 patients. PPPM unadjusted all-cause total costs were $46,348 for NIVO + IPI and $38,097 for PEM + AXI in months 1-6; $26,840 versus $27,983, respectively, in months 7-12; $22,899 versus $25,137 in months 13-18; and $22,279 versus $27,947 in months 19-24. PPPM unadjusted RCC-related costs were $44,059 for NIVO + IPI and $36,456 for PEM + AXI in months 1-6; $25,144 versus $26,692, respectively, in months 7-12; $21,645 versus $23,709 in months 13-18; and $20,486 versus $25,515 in months 19-24. PPPM costs declined more rapidly for patients receiving NIVO + IPI compared to those receiving PEM + AXI, resulting in significantly lower all-cause costs associated with NIVO + IPI during months 19-24 (difference - $10,914 [95% confidence interval - $21,436, - $1091]) and RCC-related costs during months 7-12 (- $4747 [(- $8929, - $512]) and 19-24 (- $10,261 [- $20,842, - $421]) after adjustment. Cost savings for NIVO + IPI versus PEM + AXI were driven by differences in drug costs which, after adjustment, were significantly lower in months 7-12 (difference - $5555 [all-cause], - $5689 [RCC-related]); 13-18 (- $7217 and - $6870, respectively); and 19-24 (- $16,682 and - $16,125). CONCLUSION: Although the real-world PPPM healthcare costs of 1L NIVO + IPI were higher compared with PEM + AXI in the first 6 months of treatment, the costs associated with NIVO + IPI rapidly declined thereafter, resulting in significantly lower costs vs. PEM + AXI from months 7 to 24.

Real-world experience of second-line axitinib in metastatic renal cell carcinoma: analysis of the Swedish population.

Aim: Assess the time-to-treatment discontinuation (TTD) and overall survival (OS) in a Swedish metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) nationwide cohort who received second-line axitinib.Methods: Retrospective analysis of 110 patients with mRCC treated with second-line axitinib in Sweden (2012-2019). Patients included in the study received axitinib after mainly first-line sunitinib or pazopanib.Results: The median (95% CI) TTD of patients who received second-line axitinib was 5.2 (3.7-6.1) months with 6 (5.5%) patients still receiving treatment at the time of analysis. Median (95% CI) OS was 12.2 (7.7-14.2) months.Conclusion: The results are consistent with previous findings in mRCC and add to the evidence demonstrating efficacy of second-line axitinib, after failure of a prior anti-angiogenic therapy in a real-world setting.Clinical Trial Registration: NCT04669366 (ClinicalTrials.gov).

[Box: see text].

Exploring the multifaceted antitumor activity of axitinib in lung carcinoids.

Introduction: Lung carcinoids (LCs) are a type of neuroendocrine tumor (NET) that originate in the bronchopulmonary tract. LCs account for 20-25% of all NETs and approximately 1-2% of lung cancers. Given the highly vascularized nature of NETs and their tendency to overexpress vascular growth factor receptors (VEGFR), inhibiting angiogenesis appears as a potential therapeutic target in slowing down tumor growth and spread. This study evaluated the long-term antitumor activity and related mechanisms of axitinib (AXI), a VEGFR-targeting drug, in LC cell lines. Methods: Three LC cell lines (NCI-H727, UMC-11 and NCI-H835) were incubated with their respective EC50 AXI concentrations for 6 days. At the end of the incubation, FACS experiments and Western blot analyses were performed to examine changes in the cell cycle and the activation of apoptosis. Microscopy analyses were added to describe the mechanisms of senescence and mitotic catastrophe when present. Results: The primary effect of AXI on LC cell lines is to arrest tumor growth through an indirect DNA damage. Notably, AXI triggers this response in diverse manners among the cell lines, such as inducing senescence or mitotic catastrophe. The drug seems to lose its efficacy when the DNA damage is mitigated, as observed in NCI-H835 cells. Conclusion: The ability of AXI to affect cell viability and proliferation in LC tumor cells highlights its potential as a therapeutic agent. The role of DNA damage and the consequent activation of senescence seem to be a prerequisite for AXI to exert its function.

Anti-angiogenic and antioxidant effects of axitinib in human retinal endothelial cells: implications in diabetic retinopathy.

Diabetic retinopathy is a secondary microvascular complication of diabetes mellitus. This disease progresses from two stages, non-proliferative and proliferative diabetic retinopathy, the latter characterized by retinal abnormal angiogenesis. Pharmacological management of retinal angiogenesis employs expensive and invasive intravitreal injections of biologic drugs (anti-vascular endothelial growth factor agents). To search small molecules able to act as anti-angiogenic agents, we focused our study on axitinib, which is a tyrosine kinase inhibitor and represents the second line treatment for renal cell carcinoma. Axitinib is an inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor receptors, and among the others tyrosine kinase inhibitors (sunitinib and sorafenib) is the most selective towards vascular endothelial growth factor receptors 1 and 2. Besides the well-known anti-angiogenic and immune-modulatory functions, we hereby explored the polypharmacological profile of axitinib, through a bioinformatic/molecular modeling approach and in vitro models of diabetic retinopathy. We showed the anti-angiogenic activity of axitinib in two different in vitro models of diabetic retinopathy, by challenging retinal endothelial cells with high glucose concentration (fluctuating and non-fluctuating). We found that axitinib, along with inhibition of vascular endothelial growth factor receptors 1 (1.82 ± 0.10; 0.54 ± 0.13, phosphorylated protein levels in fluctuating high glucose vs . axitinib 1 µM, respectively) and vascular endothelial growth factor receptors 2 (2.38 ± 0.21; 0.98 ± 0.20, phosphorylated protein levels in fluctuating high glucose vs . axitinib 1 µM, respectively), was able to significantly reduce (p < 0.05) the expression of Nrf2 (1.43 ± 0.04; 0.85 ± 0.01, protein levels in fluctuating high glucose vs . axitinib 1 µM, respectively) in retinal endothelial cells exposed to high glucose, through predicted Keap1 interaction and activation of melanocortin receptor 1. Furthermore, axitinib treatment significantly (p < 0.05) decreased reactive oxygen species production (0.90 ± 0.10; 0.44 ± 0.06, fluorescence units in high glucose vs . axitinib 1 µM, respectively) and inhibited ERK pathway (1.64 ± 0.09; 0.73 ± 0.06, phosphorylated protein levels in fluctuating high glucose vs . axitinib 1 µM, respectively) in HRECs exposed to high glucose. The obtained results about the emerging polypharmacological profile support the hypothesis that axitinib could be a valid candidate to handle diabetic retinopathy, with ancillary mechanisms of action.

Prognostic Impact of the Administration of Antibiotics and Proton Pump Inhibitors in Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Combination Therapy for Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma.

Background/Aim: The prognostic impact of the administration of antibiotics and proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) in immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy for advanced cancer has recently been documented. However, how these drugs affect the outcomes of first-line ICI combination therapy for advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) remains unclear. Patients and Methods: We retrospectively evaluated the data of 128 patients with RCC who received first-line ICI combination therapy. The patients were grouped according to their history of antibiotics and PPIs use one month before the initiation of ICI combination therapy. Progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and objective response rate (ORR) after ICI combination therapy were compared between patients treated with and without antibiotics or PPIs. Results: Of the 128 patients, 30 (23%) and 44 (34%) received antibiotics and PPIs, respectively. Patients treated with antibiotics exhibited shorter PFS and OS compared to those who did not receive antibiotics (median PFS: 4.9 vs. 16.1 months, p<0.0001; OS: 20.8 vs. 49.0 months, p=0.0034). Multivariate analyses showed that antibiotic administration was an independent predictor of shorter PFS (hazard ratio: 2.54: p=0.0002) and OS (hazard ratio: 2.56: p=0.0067) after adjusting for other covariates. In contrast, there were no significant differences in either PFS or OS between patients who received PPIs and those who did not. (PFS: p=0.828; OS: p=0.105). Conclusion: Antibiotics administration before ICI combination therapy was negatively associated with outcomes of first-line ICI combination therapy for advanced RCC. Therefore, careful monitoring is required for potentially high-risk patients undergoing ICI combination therapy.

The protective effects of Axitinib on blood-brain barrier dysfunction and ischemia-reperfusion injury in acute ischemic stroke.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The pathophysiological features of acute ischemic stroke (AIS) often involve dysfunction of the blood-brain barrier (BBB), characterized by the degradation of tight junction proteins (Tjs) leading to increased permeability. This dysfunction can exacerbate cerebral injury and contribute to severe complications. The permeability of the BBB fluctuates during different stages of AIS and is influenced by various factors. Developing effective therapies to restore BBB function remains a significant challenge in AIS treatment. High levels of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) in the early stages of AIS have been shown to worsen BBB breakdown and stroke progression. Our study aimed to investigate the protective effects of the VEGF receptor inhibitor Axitinib on BBB dysfunction and cerebral ischemia/reperfusion-induced injury. METHODS: BEnd3 cell exposed to oxygen-glucose deprivation (OGD) model was constructed to estimate pharmacological activity of Axitinib (400 ng/ml) on anti-apoptosis and pathological barrier function recovery. In vivo, rats were subjected to a 1 h transient middle cerebral artery occlusion and 23 h reperfusion (tMCAO/R) to investigate the permeability of BBB and cerebral tissue damage. Axitinib was administered through the tail vein at the beginning of reperfusion. BBB integrity was assessed by Evans blue leakage and the expression levels of Tjs claudin-5 and occludin. RESULTS: Our research revealed that co-incubation with Axitinib enhanced the cell viability of OGD-insulted bEnd3 cells, decreased LDH leakage rate, and suppressed the expression of apoptosis-related proteins cytochrome C and Bax. Axitinib also mitigated the damage to Tjs and facilitated the restoration of transepithelial electrical resistance in OGD-insulted bEnd.3 cells. In vivo, Axitinib administration reduced intracerebral Evans blue leakage and up-regulated the expression of Tjs in the penumbra brain tissue in tMCAO/R rats. Notably, 10 mg/kg Axitinib exerted a significant anti-ischemic effect by decreasing cerebral infarct volume and brain edema volume, improving neurological function, and reducing pro-inflammatory cytokines IL-6 and TNF-α in the brain. CONCLUSIONS: Our study highlights Axitinib as a potent protectant of blood-brain barrier function, capable of promoting pathological blood-brain barrier recovery through VEGF inhibition and increased expression of tight junction proteins in AIS. This suggests that VEGF antagonism within the first 24 h post-stroke could be a novel therapeutic approach to enhance blood-brain barrier function and mitigate ischemia-reperfusion injury.

Tumor infiltrating B lymphocytes (TIBs) associate with poor clinical outcomes, unfavorable therapeutic benefit and immunosuppressive context in metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (mccRCC) patients treated with anti-PD-1 antibody plus Axitinib.

PURPOSE: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) plus tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) has become first-line therapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients. This study aims to investigate the effect of tumor infiltrating B lymphocytes (TIBs) on the combination therapy. METHODS: The retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical records of 115 metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (mccRCC) patients treated with anti-PD-1 antibody plus Axitinib between March 2020 and June 2023. Observation target: objective response rate (ORR), and overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) and immune profile. RESULTS: Patients with high TIBs portended lower ORR of the combination therapy (p = 0.033). TIBs was an independent predictor for poorer OS (p = 0.013) and PFS (p = 0.021) in mccRCC patients with combination treatment. TIBs infiltration was associated with more CD4+T (p < 0.001), CD8+T (p < 0.001), M2 macrophages (p = 0.020) and regulatory T cells (Tregs) (p = 0.004). In TIBs high patients, the percentages of PD-1, CTLA-4 and TIM-3 positive rate were significantly increased in CD4+T (p = 0.038, 0.029 and 0.002 respectively) and CD8+T cells (p = 0.006, 0.026 and < 0.001 respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Our study revealed TIBs infiltration predicted adverse outcomes in mccRCC patients treated with anti-PD-1 antibody plus Axitinib. As a corollary, TIBs positively associated with M2 macrophages and Tregs, leading to subsequent multiple immune checkpoints related exhaustion of T cells. Thus, only PD-1 blockade are inadequate to reverse T cells exhaustion effectively in high TIBs mccRCC patients.

Systemic hypertension with VEGFR inhibitor (axitinib) therapy in cancer patients: A meta-analysis and systematic review of randomized controlled trials.

Vascular endothelial growth factor receptor inhibitors (VEGFRi), namely axitinib, are commonly used chemotherapeutic agents in patients with cancer; however, this medication has a significant cardiovascular side effect profile, such as high-grade hypertension. We performed this updated meta-analysis of RCTs to compile cardiovascular adverse events, such as all-grade and high-grade (>3) hypertension, the risk for thrombosis (DVT and PE), and peripheral edema. A systematic search was performed on PubMed, Cochrane, and Embase from inception until October 2023 for studies using axitinib to treat various cancers. Trials with patients randomly allocated for VEGFRi drug therapy with axitinib and reported all-grade hypertension as an outcome were included. Statistical analysis was performed using Cochrane Review Manager to calculate pooled proportions of odds ratios (OR) with a 95 % confidence interval (CI) using the random-effects model, Mantel-Haenszel method. A total of 8 RCTs and 2502 patients were included in the review. Compared with the placebo group, the VEGFRi (Axitinib) therapy group was associated with a higher risk of all-grade and high-grade hypertension, hand-foot syndrome, and fatigue. Furthermore, there was no increased risk of thromboembolism (DVT/PE) or hypothyroidism. However, a lower risk of peripheral edema was noted between the two groups. Screening for patients with preexisting hypertension, identifying risk factors for cardiovascular diseases before the initiation of VEGFRi therapy, and careful monitoring of high-risk patients during VEGFRi therapy, as well as prompt treatment with antihypertensive drugs, will help mitigate the adverse effects. Further evaluation using prospective designs is required to study the clinical significance and develop mitigation strategies.

Ex Vivo Evaluation of Antiangiogenic Drugs in Oral Cancer: Potential Implications for Targeting Vasculogenic Mimicry.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) is characterized by early metastasis, clinical resistance and poor prognosis. Recently, we showed that aggressive OSCC cells co-express endothelial cell markers and can form tube-like structures, known as vasculogenic mimicry (VM), a process associated with poor prognosis in head and neck cancers. Given the limited success of current antiangiogenic therapy in treating OSCC, this study sought to explore the efficiency of these drugs in targeting an ex vivo model of VM. MATERIALS AND METHODS: OSCC cell lines from the tongue and floor of the mouth in addition to human endothelial cells were used. The treatments comprised a set of clinically relevant antiangiogenic drugs: sorafenib, sunitinib, and axitinib, which were administered in different doses. Multiple ex vivo approaches including cell tubulogenesis, proliferation, apoptosis, and migration assays were used. RESULTS: Although these drugs inhibited the formation of endothelial cell capillaries, they showed clear differential effects on OSCC cell-derived VM and cell morphology. Sorafenib inhibited the tubulogenesis of aggressive OSCC cells compared with the limited effect of sunitinib and axitinib. Furthermore, our data consistently demonstrated a preferential efficacy of certain drugs over others. Sorafenib and sunitinib exhibited anti-cancer effects on tumor cell proliferation, apoptosis, and cell migration, compared with the limited effect of axitinib. CONCLUSION: The antiangiogenic drugs, except sorafenib, had limited effect on VM formation in vitro and exhibited varying anti-cancer effects on OSCC cells. These data support the notion that VM formation may in part explain the development of drug resistance in OSCC cells.