Prevalence of Depression and Coping Strategies Among Head and Neck Cancer Patients: A Hospital-Based Study.

Background The burden of cancer is increasing in all countries and so is in India. Among Indian males, lung, mouth, and tongue are very common cancers. Cancer is a life-threatening stressful condition, and cancer survivors report negative effects which decrease the quality of life because of long-term post-treatment effects. When cancer treatment is ongoing, patients express mixed emotion which is happiness and relief. This study aimed to find out the prevalence of depression and assess the coping strategies among the same head and neck cancer patients. Material and methods This cross-sectional study was conducted at the outpatient level in the Department of Radiotherapy, Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College (SDUMC), Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research (SDUAHER), Kolar, for a period of three years. The sample size was calculated based on the previous study. Head and Neck cancer patients who are more than 18 years old and histologically diagnosed with cancer were included in the study, and head and neck cancer patients with previously diagnosed mental illness or patients with mental health medications or chronically debilitated cancer were excluded. For sociodemographic details, a pretested semi-structured questionnaire was used. To assess depression Zung Depression Scale was used. To assess coping strategy the Cancer Coping Questionnaire was used. All data collected by interview technique which will last not less than 20 minutes. All data were entered in a Microsoft Excel sheet and analyzed using SPSS version 22 (Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.). To compare between groups, t-test and ANOVA were used with a statistically significant p<0.05. Results Of 188 head and neck cancer patients, 117 (62.2%) aged 31-60 years, 136 (72.3%) were females, 121 (64.4%) belonged to rural background, 143 (76.1%) were illiterates, 105 (55.9%) belonged to joint family, and 110 (58.5%) belonged to class IV modified BG Prasad classification. This study showed 16% of head and neck cancer patients had depression according to the Zung Depression Scale. With respect to the coping domain, cancer patients from rural backgrounds had higher coping scores, and illiterate had higher scores. With respect to the positive focus coping subdomain, male cancer patients had higher scores compared, to rural cancer patients, who had higher scores, and illiterate had higher scores. With respect to the diversion domain, rural cancer patients had higher scores, illiterate patients had higher scores, and this difference was statistically significant. With respect to the interpersonal scale domain, rural patients, patients belonging to joint families, patients aged more than 60 years, and illiterate patients had higher scores compared with literates, and these were statistically significant with p<0.05. This study demonstrated that the presence of depression had no impact on coping domains, and there was no significant correlation between depression and coping scores. Conclusion Mental health must be thoughtfully considered among cancer patients as cancer with depression may have a negative impact on their experience with cancer. Cancer keeps growing as a public health problem and all cancer-treating hospitals should work on various preventable measures for reducing the future burden of various health dimensions affected by cancer. The very intention of treating cancer should be improving the survival of the diagnosed case and this needs targeted mental health intervention.

Validation of the Sinhalese Version of Brief COPE Scale for patients with cancer in Sri Lanka.

BACKGROUND: Coping strategies play a vital role in cancer management and has been an integral part in the recovery process of cancer patients worldwide. Coping refers to specific efforts; both behavioral and psychological, that diminishes stresses emerged in cancer patients. This study evaluated the psychometric properties of the Sinhalese version of the Coping Orientation to Problems Experienced Inventory (S-BC) which was developed based on the Brief COPE scale  for cancer patients in Sri Lanka. METHODS: The original Brief COPE is a self-administered tool with 28 items designed to measure coping methods used by people in stressful life events. It consisted of statements related to adaptive and maladaptive coping strategies. Forty patients with cancer who were registered at the Oncology ward, Teaching Hospital, Galle, Sri Lanka were included in the study. A cross-cultural adaptation of the Brief COPE was done using WHO guidelines. Reliability of the S-BC was assessed using test-retest and internal consistency procedures. The construct validity of the tool was assessed by performing exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Convergent and discriminant validity of the S-BC was tested using World Health Organization-Quality of Life-Brief scale (WHOQOL-BREF) and Centre for Epidemiological Studies-Depression scale (CES-D). RESULTS: The mean (± SD) age of the sample was 61(± 12) years, and 52.5% (n = 21) of the participants were men. Eighty percent (n = 32) of the participants were more than one year of treatment from diagnosing as a cancer patient. The test-retest reliability of the S-BC was 0.66, and the internal consistency of the S-BC was good (Cronbach's alpha - 0.819). Both EFA and CFA revealed a structure comprised of seven factors. Such factors were Avoidance/Behavioral disengagement, Religious faith/Acceptance, Seeking support, Planning, Substance use/Venting, Self-blame and Active/positive coping. The scores of the adaptive coping of the S-BC was negatively and the scores of the maladaptive coping of the S-BC was positively correlated with the CES-D score.   The scores of the adaptive coping of the S-BC was  positively correlated with the total score of the WHOQOL-BREF questionnaire indicating the S-BC's convergent and discriminant validity properties. CONCLUSION: The Sinhalese version of the Brief COPE is found to be a valid and a reliable measure to assess coping strategies used by  patients with cancer in Sri Lanka.

Coping Strategies, Pain, and Quality of Life in Patients with Breast Cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Each year, around 16,500 women in Poland are diagnosed with breast cancer, the second most common cause of death in women. In Poland, nearly 70,000 women live with breast cancer diagnosed within the last 5 years. Quality of life (QoL) research is particularly important in cancer patients, as it provides knowledge on their psychological and physical health, as well as the environment in which the patients function, all of which is essential to implementing multidisciplinary care involving the best use of the appropriate methods. Carrying the burden of cancer is a major challenge for patients. The strategy that patients use to cope with breast cancer significantly affects their quality of life. The purpose of the study is to assess the impact of coping strategies on the QoL in breast cancer patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The prospective study included a group of 202 women who had undergone surgical treatment for breast cancer at the Lower Silesian Cancer Center and who reported for follow-up appointments at the Oncology Clinic and the Surgical Oncology Clinic. For the study, we used the: EORTC QLQ-C30 cancer questionnaire, EORTC QLQ-BR23 module, Mental Adjustment to Cancer (Mini-MAC) scale, visual analog scale (VAS) for pain intensity, as well as the patients' medical records, hospital records, and our own survey form. RESULTS: The mean patient age was 53 years. Most patients had been diagnosed with cancer between one and two years before. In the women studied, there was a negative association between QoL and the choice of a destructive strategy for coping with cancer, and a positive one between QoL and a constructive coping strategy. Severe pain caused by the disease and its treatment significantly decreased the patients' QoL in multiple domains. CONCLUSIONS: Patients choosing constructive strategies obtained higher QoL scores, while greater reliance on destructive coping strategies was associated with significantly worse QoL. In all functioning domains, higher levels of pain were associated with poorer QoL and more severe symptoms associated with the disease and its treatment.

Factors influencing posttraumatic growth in ovarian cancer survivors.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to examine posttraumatic growth (PTG), cancer coping, posttraumatic stress, and genetics knowledge among ovarian cancer survivors and to identify factors affecting PTG. METHODS: This cross-sectional study included 148 outpatient ovarian cancer survivors at a cancer center. Data were collected between February 25 and April 11, 2019, and were analyzed using t tests, ANOVA, Pearson-correlations, and multiple regression. RESULTS: On average, the ovarian cancer survivors scored 68.09 ± 20.17 in PTG, 59.75 ± 13.37 in cancer coping, 29.30 ± 17.25 in posttraumatic stress, and 9.42 ± 3.33 in genetics knowledge. There were significant differences in PTG according to religion (t = - 2.92, p = .004), marital status (F = 3.06, p = .050), and family history of cancer (t = 2.00, p = .047). In the final analysis, the statistically significant factors influencing PTG were religion (ß = .170, p = .004) and cancer coping (ß = .691, p < .001), and posttraumatic stress had borderline statistical significance (ß = - .107, p < .068). These factors explained 52.2% of the variance in PTG. CONCLUSIONS: Ovarian cancer survivors showed a moderate level of genetics knowledge while having a high risk for posttraumatic stress. Overall, this study showed that cancer coping was a powerful factor that influenced PTG in ovarian cancer survivors. Religion was found to positively affect PTG, and posttraumatic stress had a small negative effect. Spiritual nursing interventions and improving cancer coping while reducing posttraumatic stress are necessary to increase the PTG of ovarian cancer survivors.

Binational cancer patient experiences and cancer coping in a rural US-Mexico border region.

Objective: Coping with cancer is central to patients' cancer recovery and quality of life, yet little is known about cancer experiences and coping from the perspective of binational cancer patients. This brief report provides an exploration of experiences relating to cancer diagnosis/treatment and coping among Latino cancer patients living in the U.S.-Mexico border regionDesign: We conducted secondary data analysis of qualitative dataParticipants and methods: We conducted in-depth of interviews with 22 patients from a rural cancer care organization. Thematic analysis was used to analyze the data.Findings: Three themes emerged: 1) changes in sexual functioning, 2) navigating cancer in the U.S. and between Mexican border communities, and 3) social support.Conclusion: Rural Latino cancer patients face multiple challenges in accessing cancer treatments. Social support fills the gaps for their continuum of care.Implication: Promoting culturally-relevant coping and resilience in clinical practice.

Understanding How Bereaved Parents Cope With Their Grief to Inform the Services Provided to Them.

Our objective was to develop a rich description of how parents experience their grief in the first year after the death of their child, and how various bereavement follow-up and support services helped them during this time, with the aim of informing follow-up and support services offered to bereaved parents. Our findings situated parents' individual experiences of coping within the social and institutional contexts in which they grieved. In the first year after the death of their child, parents regulated their intense feelings of grief through loss-oriented, restoration-oriented, and/or meaning reconstruction strategies. Often, parents' relationships with others and many of the bereavement follow-up and support services helped them in this regard. This article also explores how the results may aid service providers in accompanying parents in a way that optimizes outcomes for these parents.

Effectiveness, acceptance and satisfaction of guided chat groups in psychosocial aftercare for outpatients with prostate cancer after prostatectomy.

BACKGROUND: Physical and psychological symptoms associated with prostate cancer and its treatment can cause patients to feel distressed. Furthermore, patients still experience a range of unmet support needs. Online interventions have the potential to fill a gap in cancer care by augmenting the limited available mental health services. OBJECTIVE: The main goal of the study was to evaluate the effectiveness of guided chat groups in psychosocial aftercare for outpatients with prostate cancer. Additionally, the participants' satisfaction with and acceptance of the intervention was measured and evaluated. METHODS: A quasi-experimental design was used to analyze the research questions. 18 prostate cancer patients followed five web-based chat-group sessions. 26 patients received treatment as usual. The guided chat group enabled patients to exchange concerns, problems and support with fellow patients. The intervention group and control patients had to fill in self-reported questionnaires before the intervention and at a follow-up. Outcome measures include distress, anxiety, depression, anger, need for help, quality of life (QoL), fear of progression (FoP) and coping with cancer. To analyze the effectiveness of the chat groups, an analysis of covariance was conducted. RESULTS: The analysis of covariance revealed one significant difference between the two groups for the outcome anger. The difference had a large effect size (η2 = 0.160) with higher scores for the intervention group. Further differences with a medium effect size were found for coping with cancer, the physical component of quality of life and depression. The intervention group scored higher on all three outcomes.Additionally, participants reported that the atmosphere in the chat sessions was confidential and believed that the chat program worked as a bridge between inpatient treatment and daily life. CONCLUSIONS: Intervention participants reported poorer results for the primary and secondary outcomes in comparison to the control group patients at follow up, which indicates that web based chat groups may not be an effective way to decrease prostate cancer perceived distress even if the intervention participants seem to accept the intervention.

Coping with colorectal cancer: a qualitative exploration with patients and their family members.

BACKGROUND: Extensive family coping research has been conducted among breast cancer, prostate cancer and melanoma with lesser emphasis on the coping experiences of colorectal cancer (CRC) patients and their family members. OBJECTIVE: To examine ways in which patients and their family members cope with the diagnosis of CRC. METHODS: A total of 73 participants (21 patients, 52 family members) from 23 families described their experiences during and after a CRC diagnosis, including their coping experiences with the diagnosis. Data from semi-structured interviews were audio recorded and transcribed. The data were analyzed utilizing content analysis with inductive coding methods. RESULTS: Eight major themes were identified: positive reframing, holding on to a sense of normalcy, religion and spirituality, joining a group, creating awareness of CRC, lifestyle change, seeking information and alternative treatments. Maintaining an emotional sense of normalcy through positive thinking, engaging in activities to take one's mind off the diagnosis and believing that there is a higher authority which has control over the diagnosis and life were vital for the patients and their family members. Patients and family members used similar coping strategies. CONCLUSION: Findings from this study have implications for understanding how families blend emotion-based and problem-focused coping strategies in the face of a CRC diagnosis. Further developing evidence-based interventions that target coping and well-being in cancer patients and extending them to family members is necessary and holds great promise for providers who care for patients with familial cancers.