Incidence of Carotid Blowout Syndrome in Patients with Head and Neck Cancer after Radiation Therapy: A Cohort Study.

Carotid blowout syndrome (CBS) is a rare yet life-threatening complication that occurs after radiation therapy (RT). This study aimed to determine the incidence of CBS in patients with head and neck cancer (HNC) undergoing contemporary RT and to explore potential discrepancies in the risk of CBS between nasopharyngeal cancer (NPC) and non-NPC patients. A total of 1084 patients with HNC who underwent RT between 2013 and 2023 were included in the study. All patients were under regular follow-ups at the radio-oncology department, and underwent annual contrast-enhanced computed tomography and/or magnetic resonance imaging for cancer recurrence surveillance. Experienced neuroradiologists and vascular neurologists reviewed the recruited patients' images. Patients were further referred to the neurology department for radiation vasculopathy evaluation. The primary outcome of this study was CBS. Patients were categorized into NPC and non-NPC groups and survival analysis was employed to compare the CBS risk between the two groups. A review of the literature on CBS incidence was also conducted. Among the enrolled patients, the incidence of CBS in the HNC, NPC, and non-NPC groups was 0.8%, 0.9%, and 0.7%, respectively. Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed no significant difference between the NPC and non-NPC groups (p = 0.34). Combining the findings for our cohort with those of previous studies revealed that the cumulative incidence of CBS in patients with HNC is 5% (95% CI = 3-7%) after both surgery and RT, 4% (95% CI = 2-6%) after surgery alone, and 5% (95% CI = 3-7%) after RT alone. Our findings indicate a low incidence of CBS in patients with HNC undergoing contemporary RT. Patients with NPC may have a CBS risk close to that of non-NPC patients. However, the low incidence of CBS could be a potentially cause of selection bias and underestimation bias.

Endovascular Treatment for Primary Tumor Hemorrhage in Oropharyngeal Carcinoma: A Report of Two Cases.

Acute arterial hemorrhage is a damaging and sometimes lethal complication that occurs in patients with head and neck cancer. However, achieving hemostasis can be challenging because of the difficulty in applying pressure in the throat and oral cavity. In this context, endovascular treatment (ET) has been performed in recent years. This report aims to describe the benefits of ET for acute bleeding. Additionally, our findings emphasize the importance of early diagnosis and treatment of tumor-related bleeding, not only for immediate life-saving benefits but also for the potential resumption of irradiation and chemotherapy, which can lead to favorable long-term prognoses in some instances. We describe two cases of primary tumor bleeding where treatment was successful with ET. Neurosurgeons performed these treatments, and effective hemostasis was achieved in both cases. No complications or rebleeding were observed. ET is a better option for hemorrhage from oropharyngeal tumors than for hemorrhage from the main trunk of the carotid artery. The efficacy of ET is dependent on the vessels involved, and early identification of the culprit artery can predict the prognosis. ET should be considered an option for acute arterial hemorrhage in head and neck cancer.

[Treatment strategy of carotid blowout syndrome after radiotherapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma].

Objective:To investigate the treatment of internal carotid artery rupture after radiotherapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Methods:The clinical data of 7 patients with internal carotid artery rupture after radiotherapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma from March 2020 to March 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. Results:Skull base osteonecrosis with infection occurred in 4 cases, and tumor recurrence with infection in 3 cases. DSA showed that internal carotid artery rupture was located in the internal carotid artery petrosal segment in 6 cases, and in the paravicular segment in 1 case. Balloon occlusion test（BOT） was performed in 6 patients, of which 3 passed and 3 failed. Vascular treatment included internal carotid artery embolization（4 cases）, false aneurysm embolization 1 case（rebleeding）, coated stent 1 case（rebleeding）, muscle compression during operation（1 case）. Patients with rebleeding received high-flow bypass. Three cases developed cerebral infarction after embolization without severe sequelae after treatment, and no death occurred within 90 days. After bleeding control, all 3 patients with cranial base necrosis received surgical treatment to remove the necrotic bone and tissue flap repair, and 1 patient with recurrence received gamma knife and targeted therapy, 1 patient received immune and surgical therapy, and 1 patient received immune and targeted therapy. Conclusion:Rupture and hemorrhage of internal carotid artery after radiotherapy is related to tumor invasion, tissue injury and local infection after radiotherapy. For those caused by tumor invasion, it is recommended to sacrifice the responsible vessels. For those caused by infection, emergency surgery is recommended and blood vessels preserved. Emergency vascular occlusion remains a life-saving option.

Clinical and MRI risk factors predicting post-irradiation carotid blowout syndrome in patients with nasopharyngeal cancer.

OBJECTIVE: To explore the clinical and imaging features of nasopharyngeal cancer (NPC) complicated by acute carotid blowout syndrome (CBS), analyze the risk factors for CBS, and improve diagnostic vigilance for early intervention. METHODS: This retrospective review was conducted between January 2003 and May 2023. Altogether, 49 patients with post-irradiation NPC with CBS and 49 patients without CBS as control group were enrolled. The condition of the patients when CBS occurred was reviewed. Patient characteristics of the CBS and control groups were compared, and binary logistic regression analysis was performed to identify risk factors for CBS. RESULTS: All patients in the CBS group were conscious, and 41 patients had a Karnofsky performance assessment scale score of ≥ 70. After interventional therapy, 43 patients survived (the mean survival time of patients after CBS was 3.2 ± 2.1 years). Compared with the control group, the CBS group had a higher incidence of sphenoid sinusitis (81% vs. 52.4%), osteonecrosis (82.9% vs. 51.2%), artery exposure (29.3% vs. 4.9%), and internal carotid artery injury (61% vs. 29.3%). Osteonecrosis and artery exposure were selected as important risk factor for CBS, with p-values of 0.016 and 0.031, respectively. CONCLUSION: CBS is an important factor that affects the survival of patients with NPC. If internal carotid artery injury, artery exposure, sphenoid sinusitis, and osteonecrosis are present, especially the latter two signs, the possibility of CBS should be considered.

Emergency Management and Nursing Considerations of Carotid Blowout Syndrome.

INTRODUCTION: Carotid blowout syndrome is a rare but fatal complication often witnessed secondary to treating patients with head and neck cancer. It occurs when damage and necrosis lead to the carotid artery wall rupture. The symptoms encountered in these patients range from asymptomatic to cardiac arrest. Here, we present 5 cases of carotid blowout syndrome in the emergency department. CASE PRESENTATIONS: Patients demonstrated symptoms ranging from subtle bleeding to hemodynamic instability, highlighting the diverse nature of carotid blowout syndrome in this population. Notably, while all patients had a history of radiotherapy, some had additional risk factors for carotid blowout syndrome, including prior surgery (n = 2), malnutrition (n = 3), and tracheostomies (n = 2). Definitive diagnoses were established through clinical evaluation and computed tomography angiography. Immediate interventions included bleeding control, resuscitation, and consultations with relevant specialties. Four patients underwent interventional radiology procedures, and 1 patient received otolaryngology care. While 2 patients recovered completely, 1 died in the emergency department, and 1 in the intensive care unit. One patient's clinical course was complicated by a stroke. CONCLUSION: The approach to the carotid blowout syndrome patient includes complex steps that proceed in a multidisciplinary manner, starting from triage until discharge. Emergency nurses play crucial roles at every stage. They should be aware of carotid blowout syndrome when evaluating patients with head and neck cancer presenting with bleeding. When treating these patients, emergency nurses should be ready for airway interventions, bleeding control, and massive transfusion protocol. In this context, the multifaceted approaches made by nurses contribute significantly to carotid blowout syndrome management in the emergency department.

Exposed Embolic Coils Observed in a 64-Year-Old Male With Head and Neck Cancer Following Transarterial Embolization for Carotid Blowout Syndrome.

Background: Delayed migration and exposure of embolic coils is a rare complication of endovascular therapy for carotid blowout syndrome. Methods: A 64-year-old man with recurrent tongue cancer noticed the presence of foreign body in the malignant wound on the right side of his neck. He had undergone transarterial embolization on his right vertebral artery, right common carotid artery (CCA), and internal carotid artery (ICA) for carotid blowout syndrome 1 month prior. On physical examination, exposed spring-like metallic coils were observed, covered in brownish granulation tissue, at the bottom of the malignant wound. Neck radiograph and computed tomography confirmed the extrusion and migration of the embolic coils. Results: In this case, the patient was managed by transection of the exposed coils at the wound surface with close monitoring. Conclusions: Computed tomography angiography is essential for assessing the condition of the remaining embolic coils. In cases with thrombosed parent arteries, a conservative approach, like the transection of exposed coils, can be employed as part of the management strategy.

The Clinical Outcome of Carotid Blowout Syndrome Showing Non-bleeding Angiography.

OBJECTIVE: Patient with carotid blowout syndrome (CBS) may demonstrated non-bleeding digital subtraction angiography (DSA) without identifying pseudoaneurysm or contrast extravasation. Our objective is to evaluate the clinical outcomes for this specific subset of patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective observational study was conducted on 172 CBS patients who received DSA for evaluation of transarterial embolization (TAE) between 2005 and 2022, of whom 19 patients had non-bleeding DSA and did not undergo TAE. RESULTS: The age (55.2 ± 7.3 vs. 54.8 ± 11.1), male sex (17/19 vs. 135/153), tumor size (5.6 ± 2.4 vs. 5.2 ± 2.2), cancer locations were similar (P > 0.05) between both groups; except for there were more pseudoaneurysm/active bleeding (85.6% vs. 0%) and less vascular irregularity (14.4% vs. 94.7%) in the TAE group (P < 0.001). In the multivariable Cox regression model adjusting for age, sex, and tumor size, non-bleeding DSA group was independently associated with recurrent bleeding compared to TAE group (adjusted hazard ratio = 3.5, 95% confidence interval: 1.9-6.4, P < 0.001). Furthermore, the presence of vascular irregularity was associated with segmental recurrent bleeding (adjusted HR = 8.0, 95% CI 2.7-23.3, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Patient showing non-bleeding DSA thus not having TAE had higher risk of recurrent bleeding, compared to patient who received TAE. Level of Evidence Level 4, Case Series.

Safety and efficacy of protective stent insertion to prevent carotid blowout syndrome at the distal internal carotid artery in nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients: a comparison with endovascular occlusion.

Background: Carotid blowout syndrome (CBS) frequently occurs at the distal internal carotid artery (distal-ICA) in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC), and remedial treatments run a high risk for neurologic complications. A case-control study was conducted to evaluate the safety and efficacy of protective stent insertion at the distal-ICA to prevent CBS in NPC patients, with a comparison to endovascular coil occlusion. Methods: A total of 28 consecutive NPC patients at high risk of CBS from June 2019 to December 2021 in Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital (a tertiary institution) were retrospectively included and divided into a stent protection group and occlusion group. Technique feasibility, treatment outcomes and neurological deficiency were compared between the two groups by two-sample test. Kaplan-Meier analysis compared patients' survival rates at mid-term follow-up. Results: Stent insertion was performed in 15 patients and ICA occlusion in 13 patients. The technical success rate was 100% in both groups. Procedure-related ischemic stroke was identified in 2 patients (15.4%) in the occlusion group, compared with none in the stent protection group. Bleeding was encountered in one patient in the stent protection group and one patient in the occlusion group, each. During a median follow-up of 10.5 (range, 2-31) months, 3 patients (20%) showed asymptomatic in-stent occlusion in the stent protection group. Notably, the median survival time was significantly longer in the stent protection group than in the occlusion group (23.3 vs. 15.8 months, P=0.04). Conclusions: Protective stenting the distal-ICA was similarly effective in preventing CBS in NPC patients but was safer than endovascular occlusion of ICA.

Brain abscesses following carotid blowout syndrome: a case report.

We report a case of intracranial abscesses development in a patient with head and neck cancer after emergent treatment of carotid blowout syndrome with coil embolization. Our patient is a 60-year-old male who presented with hemoptysis and hematemesis, which raised concerns for impending carotid blowout syndrome. Endovascular occlusion was successfully achieved, and the patient was discharged in stable condition. Ten days later, the patient reported headaches and right facial pain, and magnetic resonance imaging revealed multiple intracranial abscesses. Broad-spectrum intravenous antibiotics were administered, leading to a variable response with some abscesses decreasing in size and others increasing. Seven weeks from discharge, the patient had no neurological deficits, and all abscesses had decreased in size.

Endovascular Management of Post-Irradiated Carotid Blowout Syndrome in Patients with Lower Neck Cancers.

OBJECTIVE: Lower neck cancers (LNCs) include specific tumour types and have some different vascular supply or collaterals from other head and neck cancers. This prospective study evaluated the outcome of endovascular management of post-irradiated carotid blowout syndrome (PCBS) in patients with LNC by comparing reconstructive management (RE) and deconstructive management (DE). METHODS: This was a single centre, prospective cohort study. Patients with LNC complicated by PCBS between 2015 and 2021 were enrolled for RE or DE. RE was performed by stent graft placement covering the pathological lesion and preventive external carotid artery (ECA) embolisation without balloon test occlusion (BTO). DE was performed after successful BTO by permanent coil or adhesive agent embolisation of the internal carotid artery (ICA) and ECA to common carotid artery, or ICA occlusion alone if the pathological lesion was ICA only. Cross occlusion included the proximal and distal ends of the pathological lesion in all patients. Re-bleeding events, haemostatic period, and neurological complications were evaluated. RESULTS: Fifty-nine patients (mean age 58.5 years; 56 male) were enrolled, including 28 patients undergoing RE and 31 patients undergoing DE. Three patients originally grouped to DE were transferred to RE owing to failed BTO. The results of RE vs. DE were as follows: rebleeding events, 13/28 (46%) vs. 10/31 (32%) (p = .27); haemostatic period, 9.4 ± 14.0 months vs. 14.2 ± 27.8 months (p = .59); neurological complication, 4/28 (14%) vs. 5/31 (16%) (p = .84); and survival time, 11.8 ± 14.6 months vs. 15.1 ± 27.5 months (p = .61). CONCLUSION: No difference in rebleeding risk or neurological complications was observed between the DE and RE groups. RE could be used as a potential routine treatment for PCBS in patients with LNC.

Complication of head and neck cancer: Carotid blowout syndrome.

Carotid blowout syndrome (CBS) is an uncommon but potentially life-threatening condition characterized by the spontaneous or traumatic rupture of the carotid artery in the neck. Oftentimes, CBS is due a loss of structural arterial integrity from local radiotherapy or surgical procedures. A vast majority of patients who develop CBS also have a previous diagnosis of head and neck cancer. Due to the specific patient population who develop CBS and its life-threatening nature, CBS should be a part of emergency physicians differential for those who present with a chronic neck wound or neurological symptoms in those with a previous head and neck cancer diagnosis. In this case report, a patient with a history of squamous cell carcinoma of the oropharynx who was treated with chemoradiation therapy, presented to the emergency department with spontaneous bleeding from an existing chronic wound on the left lateral neck. Conservative measures were taken including wound dressing, and the patient was discharged to see dermatology for biopsy of a suspected cancerous lesion. Once the chronic lesion was biopsied, the patient had to be immediately rushed to the operating room due to a brisk pulsatile bleeding from puncturing the carotid artery. Proper wound packing and an ultrasound of the neck for a proper diagnosis may have prevented the need for surgical intervention in this case. Although CBS is not common, complications can lead to death as seen in this case. Timely recognition and proper interventions are critical for preventing potentially fatal outcomes in those with CBS.

Outcomes Following Treatment for Carotid Blowout in Head and Neck Cancer Patients.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to determine outcomes after interventional radiology treatment of carotid blowout. METHODS: Patients with head and neck cancer and who received interventional radiology treatment for carotid blowout between 2000 and 2022 were included. Pre-treatment, treatment, and post-treatment variables were evaluated. RESULTS: Fourteen patients met inclusion criteria. Eleven patients (78.6%) had a history of radiation. Twelve (85.7%) blowouts occurred within 6 months of recent intervention. Initial treatment was with stenting (n = 9, 64.3%), coil embolization (n = 4, 28.6%), or both (n = 1, 7.1%). Six patients (42.9%) underwent subsequent carotid bypass. Morbidity following treatment included stroke (n = 1) and rebleeding (n = 4). Six-month survival was 57.1%. Of the patients who survived past six months, 5/8 were treated with carotid bypass and coverage. Four patients died of cancer progression, three of rebleeding, and three of medical complications. CONCLUSION: The majority of carotid blowout occurs within 6 months of surgery or radiation. Many who survive will die of cancer progression or medical illness. Carotid bypass with flap coverage may be a worthwhile treatment for carotid blowout and should be considered as an adjunct to endovascular treatment. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4 Laryngoscope, 134:695-700, 2024.

Surgical treatment of carotid blowout syndrome after radiotherapy for head and neck malignant tumors: a single-center experience.

To explore the treatments for and manifestations of carotid blowout syndrome (CBS) and to further explore the critical role of high-flow bypass combined with parent artery isolation. The clinical data of nine patients with radiotherapy-related CBS who were admitted to our hospital from March 2020 to March 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. Relevant literature was reviewed. From March 2020 to March 2023, nine CBS patients were admitted to Tianjin Huanhu Hospital, including eight males and one female. Digital subtraction angiography was performed for all the patients; all the pseudoaneurysms were located at the petrous segment of the internal carotid artery. A balloon occlusion test was performed on four patients, which was tolerated by all patients. CT and MRI scans showed seven cases of osteonecrosis combined with infection and two cases of tumor recurrence. Emergency permanent parent artery occlusion was performed on six patients, aneurysm embolization was completed in one case, covered stent implantation was performed in one patient, and three cases were treated by cerebral bypass surgery (including two patients with failed interventional treatment). Rebleeding was found in two patients, and no rebleeding was found in the bypass group. Paralysis was found in three patients, and asymptomatic cerebral infarction without permanent neurologic impairment was found in three patients. Two patients died due to tumor progression. Emergency occlusion surgery is lifesaving in the acute phase of CBS. Endovascular therapy cannot prevent the progression of pseudoaneurysms or lower the recurrence rate of bleeding events. High-flow bypass combined with parent artery isolation is a safe and effective method that may facilitate further surgical treatment. Further research is warranted.

Survival analysis of a comprehensive treatment strategy for internal carotid artery blowout syndrome by nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

OBJECTIVE: To retrospectively analyze the comprehensive treatment strategy for internal carotid artery blowout syndrome (CBS) by nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). METHODS: Of the 311 patients of NPC with carotid artery blowout syndrome admitted at our center from April 2018 to August 2022, 288 were enrolled. RESULTS: The patients were divided into two groups: treatment group (266 cases) and control group (22 cases). After comprehensive treatment, the survival rate of the treatment group was significantly higher than that of the control group, especially within 6 months to the 1 year. Preventive intervention for CBS I type may have considerable benefits. And in the long run, this treatment strategy did not significantly increase the incidence of stroke in the treatment group. CONCLUSION: The comprehensive treatment strategy for ICA-CBS of patients with NPC significantly reduced the mortality of asphyxia due to epistaxis, reduced the incidence of CBS during nasal endoscopy, and finally improved survival rate.

Challenges in Managing Intractable Epistaxis in a Post-nasal Surgery and Radiated Cancer Patient: A Case Report and Literature Review.

Recurrent epistaxis represents an alarming sign that may suggest a sinister aetiology, especially in patients with previous head and neck malignancy. The recognition of certain potentially life-threatening conditions, namely pseudoaneurysm or tumour recurrence, remains prudence to avoid disastrous repercussion. Nasal endoscopy has become an essential tool in otolaryngology. It can aid identify the underlying cause of epistasis and facilitate therapeutic management. On the other hand, radio imaging is highly sensitive in detecting vascular lesions, besides providing a pre-operative mapping if surgical intervention is planned. This paper reported a patient with sphenoidal sinus squamous cell carcinoma in remission presented with torrential epistaxis not relieved with nasal packing. Despite a repeated angiogram and magnetic resonance image, the identification of the source of bleeding remained futile, culminating in an examination under general anaesthesia. The diagnosis of carotid blowout syndrome was made intraoperatively, and the bleeding was temporarily secured with a muscular patch, preceded by the insertion of a vascular stent. The authors wish to highlight the importance of examination under general anaesthesia if radio imaging does not correlate to the clinical findings. Management options for carotid blowout should be tailored to the patients' medical conditions. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12070-023-03625-4.

Treatment of intractable epistaxis in patients with nasopharyngeal cancer.

Aim: To investigate the treatment of intractable epistaxis after radiotherapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC).Methods: This review focuses on the anatomy and pathophysiology, mechanism, and clinical treatments of epistaxis after NPC radiotherapy.Results: For treating NPC, radiation therapy is the primary therapeutic modality. However, radiotherapy can lead to varied degrees of harm to the neighboring tissues and is correlated with numerous complications. Among these complications, epistaxis is a common occurrence after NPC radiotherapy, owing to damage to the surrounding tissues caused by radiotherapy. Unfortunately, epistaxis, particularly carotid blowout, can have a dangerous course and a high mortality rate. Accurate understanding of epistaxis following radiotherapy, prompt bleeding cessation, and reduction of bleeding volume are key considerations. Nasal tamponade is a crucial rescue treatment, while tracheotomy is an active and effective method. Intravascular balloon embolization is a reliable and effective treatment method for ICA hemorrhage, and vascular embolization is the primary approach for treating external carotid artery maxillary bleeding. Implantation of a covered stent can achieve hemostasis without altering hemodynamics.Conclusion: A comprehensive approach utilizing these methods can improve the success rate of treating nosebleeds following NPC radiotherapy.HighlightsThe mortality rate for carotid blowout following radiotherapy for NPC is high.Radiation therapy and tumor condition are correlated with epistaxis in NPC.Treatment methods for NPC-related epistaxis include posterior nostril tamponade, endoscopic hemostasis, DSA, selective vascular embolization, and stent implantation.The use of a covered stent for NPC-related carotid blowout achieves hemostasis without altering blood perfusion.Effective and timely application of various hemostasis methods is key to improving the success rate of rescue, considering the characteristics of NPC-related epistaxis.

Deconstructive versus reconstructive approach to internal carotid artery blowout in radiated nasopharyngeal carcinoma: A tertiary center experience and systematic review.

The objective of this study was to compare the outcomes of parent artery occlusion (PAO) versus stent-assisted reconstruction in radiated nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) patients with internal carotid artery (ICA) blowouts. A retrospective review from our institution (2011-2021) and systematic review of Pubmed and Embase (1995-2022) was performed. Twenty-eight eligible studies were identified. Eighty-six PAOs and 37 stent-assisted reconstructions were analyzed, including 11 PAOs and 5 stents from our institution. Stents were associated with significantly higher incidence of overall re-bleeding (16.2% [95% CI 7.4-31.9] vs. 4.6% [95% CI 1.3-13.5], p = 0.047), delayed stroke (5.4% [95% CI 1.3-19.4] vs. 0%, p = 0.034) and reduced median survival (7.1 [95% CI 3.8-14.0] months vs. 29.0 [95% CI 9.4-63.4] months, p = 0.017) compared to PAO. There were no significant differences in terms of overall stroke, infection, extruded/migrated foreign body, and peri-procedure death. PAO is preferred over reconstructive treatment in patients with adequate collateral circulation.

Carotid Blowout Syndrome in Head and Neck Cancer Patients: Management of Patients At Risk for CBS.

OBJECTIVES: Carotid blowout syndrome (CBS) is an acute, rare life-threatening hemorrhage that occurs in patients with a history of head and neck cancer and radiation therapy. The primary objective of this review was to identify risk factors and assess treatment and survival outcomes following CBS. METHODS: A systematic review of published literature was performed. Information including risk factors, treatment, and outcomes of CBS were collected. RESULTS: A total of 49 articles and 2220 patients were included in the systematic review. Risk factors for developing CBS included a history of radiation therapy, wound complications, and advanced tumor stage. The initial management of CBS included establishing a stable airway, gaining hemostasis, and repletion of blood loss. Endovascular and surgical procedures treat CBS with infrequent rates of rebleeding and periprocedural complications. Short-term survival following treatment of CBS shows high survival rates when considering CBS-related complications and underlying disease, however, long-term survival related to the underlying disease demonstrated high mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Identifying patients at risk for CBS enables practitioners to counsel patients on life-saving interventions and expected outcomes following treatment of CBS. Treatment of CBS is associated with high short-term survival, although long-term survival related to underlying disease is low. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: N/A Laryngoscope, 133:576-587, 2023.

Idiopathic common carotid artery laceration: A case report.

Carotid artery injury is a rare disease often caused by neck trauma or irradiation of head and neck cancer. It is not easy to diagnose quickly without these backgrounds. Herein, we report a case of a 52-year-old man with no history of trauma or irradiation whose carotid artery was found to be injured. It was suggested that patients without any other disease but hypertension could have carotid artery injury. Additionally, it was challenging to detect extravasation from the carotid artery by computed tomography scan and ultrasonography in the emergency department. We should consider the possibility of carotid artery injury when examining patients with sudden neck swelling, even without any history of trauma or irradiation.