Antimicrobial susceptibility to last-resort antibiotics in carbapenemase-producing bacteria from Ukrainian patients.

Since March 2022, an increase was observed in multidrug-resistant microorganisms (MDRO), associated with the hospital transfer of Ukrainian patients. The goal was to collect phenotypic susceptibility data and assess clinical implications. Carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales (CPE, n = 96), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (CPPA, n = 20), and carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii-calcoaceticus (CRAB, n = 6) from Ukrainian patients were obtained from March to December 2022 from the Dutch MDRO surveillance. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed using broth microdilution (BMD) when available, fosfomycin agar dilution, disk diffusion (DD) for cefiderocol, and diverse gradient strips. All isolates were sequenced with Illumina next-generation sequencing. For meropenem, aminoglycosides, ceftazidime-avibactam, ceftolozane-tazobactam, and imipenem-relebactam, susceptibility rates were low (0%-30%), due to the high number of blaNDM-positive isolates (79/122; 65%). For cefiderocol, results depended on reading with or without microcolonies, applying EUCAST or CLSI breakpoints, and whether DD or BMD was used; e.g., for Klebsiella pneumoniae, 30%-97% were susceptible. For colistin, 103/111 (93%) non-intrinsically resistant CPE/CPPA/CRAB isolates were susceptible. For most CPE, a low minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) of <0.5 mg/L was measured for tigecycline and ceftazidime-avibactam-aztreonam. For CPPA, cefiderocol tested susceptible in 65%-100% of isolates. For CRAB, ampicillin-sulbactam MICs were ≥128 mg/L; for sulbactam-durlobactam, 1-2 mg/L. Admission in a Ukrainian hospital in the last year was a risk factor for MDRO, and majority were screening isolates (79%). There is extensive phenotypic resistance to last-resort antibiotics in MDRO from Ukrainian patients. Interpretation of cefiderocol susceptibility results depends on several variables. When treating patients recently admitted in Ukraine, suspected for Gram-negative bacterial infection, this should be taken into consideration. IMPORTANCE: Since March 2022, multidrug-resistant microorganisms associated with Ukrainian patients have been detected in national surveillance systems of several European countries. We studied the phenotypic antimicrobial susceptibility to last-resort antibiotics of multidrug-resistant microorganisms from Ukrainian patients in the Netherlands and assessed clinical implications. Our research revealed that there was extensive phenotypic resistance to last-resort antibiotics. Healthcare professionals should be aware of multidrug-resistant microorganisms when treating patients recently admitted in Ukraine, suspected for Gram-negative bacterial infection.

Ceftolozane/Tazobactam treatment for patients with hospital-acquired and ventilatory-associated bacterial pneumonia in Canada in 2022-2024: results from the CLEAR registry.

BACKGROUND: We report results from the national CLEAR (Canadian Leadership on Antimicrobial Real-Life Usage) registry on the usage of ceftolozane/tazobactam in Canada from 2022 to 2024. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: The authors reviewed the final data using the national ethics approved CLEAR study. Thereafter, the literature is surveyed regarding the usage of ceftolozane/tazobactam to treat patients with HABP and VABP via PubMed (up to May 2024). RESULTS: Ceftolozane/tazobactam was primarily used as directed therapy to treat HABP and VABP caused by Pseudomonas aeruginosa. It was primarily used alone, or in combination with another agent, to treat resistant and multidrug-resistant (MDR) P. aeruginosa infections. Despite primarily being used to treat severely ill patients in intensive care units, its use was associated with relatively high microbiological/clinical cure rates, along with an excellent safety profile. Several reports attest to the microbiological/clinical efficacy and safety of using ceftolozane/tazobactam to treat HABP and VABP. CONCLUSIONS: In Canada, ceftolozane/tazobactam is primarily used as directed therapy alone, or in combination, to treat MDR P. aeruginosa infections. Though mostly used to treat severely ill patients in the ICU, ceftolozane/tazobactam use in HABP and VABP is associated with relatively high microbiological/clinical cure rates and an excellent safety profile.

Effect of Ceftaroline, Ceftazidime/Avibactam, Ceftolozane/Tazobactam, and Meropenem/Vaborbactam on Establishment of Colonization by Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococci and Klebsiella pneumoniae in Mice.

Background: The potential for promotion of intestinal colonization with healthcare-associated pathogens by new antibiotics used to treat infections due to multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacilli is unclear. Methods: Mice treated for 3 days with daily subcutaneous phosphate-buffered saline (control), ceftazidime/avibactam, ceftolozane/tazobactam, ceftaroline, and meropenem/vaborbactam were challenged with 10,000 colony-forming units (CFU) of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus (VRE) resistant to each of the antibioics or carbapenemase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae 1 day after the final treatment dose. The concentrations of VRE or K. pneumoniae in stool were measured on days 1, 3, 6, and 15 after challenge. Results: Control mice had transient low levels of VRE or K. pneumoniae (<3 log10 CFU/g) detected in stool with negative cultures on days 6 and 15 after challenge. In comparison to control mice, each of the antibiotics promoted establishment of high-density colonization with VRE (mean concentration, >8 log10 CFU/g of stool on day 1 after challenge) that persisted at >4 log10 CFU/g of stool through day 15 (P<0.01). In comparison to control mice, meropenem/vaborbactam and ceftaroline promoted high-density colonization with K. pneumoniae (peak concentration, >8 log10 CFU/g of stool) (P<0.01), ceftolozane/tazobactam promoted colonization to a lesser degree (peak concentration, >5 log10 CFU/g of stool), and ceftazidime/avibactam did not promote colonization (P>0.05). Conclusions: Our results suggest that several beta-lactam antibiotics recently developed for treatment of infections with resistant Gram-negative bacilli have the potential to promote colonization by healthcare-associated pathogens. Additional studies are needed to examine the impact of these agents in patients.

Effectiveness and safety of Ceftolozane/Tazobactam administered in continuous infusion through elastomeric pumps in OPAT regimen: a case series.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to present real-life data on the use, effectiveness, and safety of administering Ceftolozane/Tazobactam (C/T) through elastomeric pumps (EP) in the outpatient setting. METHODS: This case series study was conducted from January 2022 to July 2023 in a large University Hospital in Rome, Italy. Patients receiving continuous infusion of C/T via EP were included up to a follow-up period of 90 days after the end of antibiotic therapy. The primary endpoint was the infection's clinical cure rate. Secondary endpoints were adverse events attributable to continuous home infusion of Ceftolozane/Tazobactam via elastomeric pumps. RESULTS: Seven patients received C/T continuously infused via EP and were included in the final analysis. Three patients suffered from prosthetic joint infection (n = 3/7; 43%), two patients from osteomyelitis (n = 2/7; 29%), one patient from otomastoiditis (n = 1/7; 15%) and one from pneumonia (n = 1/7; 15%). All infection were sustained by P. aeruginosa. Five strains had MDR-type susceptibility profiles (n = 5/7; 71%) and two of these were DTR (n = 2/7; 29%). The infection cure rate reached 86% (n = 6/7). Two patients reported a complication related to the vascular catheter for drug infusion (n = 2/7; 29%). CONCLUSIONS: Continuous infusion of Ceftolozane/Tazobactam by elastomeric pumps has been shown to be safe and effective in practice representing a viable option of intravenous treatment in outpatient setting for infection sustained by P. aeruginosa especially for multidrug-resistant strains.

Molecular characterization of clinically isolated Pseudomonas aeruginosa with varying resistance to ceftazidime-avibactam and ceftolozane-tazobactam collected as a part of the ATLAS global surveillance program from 2020 to 2021.

Ceftazidime-avibactam (CZA) and ceftolozane-tazobactam (C/T) are important agents for treating multidrug-resistant P. aeruginosa infections. In this study, we evaluated the molecular characteristics of 300 globally collected clinical P. aeruginosa isolates non-susceptible (NS) to CZA, C/T, or both agents. Isolates were CZA-NS and C/T-NS (n = 57), CZA-susceptible (S) and C/T-NS (n = 145), or CZA-NS and C/T-S (n = 98) selected from the Antimicrobial Testing Leadership and Surveillance (ATLAS) surveillance program from 2020 to 2021. Characterization was by whole-genome sequencing. Analysis was performed to identify ß-lactamase genes and mutations that impact efflux regulation, AmpC regulation, and target binding (PBP3). Of the 57 CZA-NS+C/T-NS isolates, 64.9% carried a metallo-ß-lactamase (MBL), and a cumulative 84.2% carried any non-intrinsic ß-lactamase [i.e., not Pseudomonas-derived cephalosporinase (PDC) or OXA-50-like]. Of the 145 CZA-S+C/T-NS isolates, 26.2% carried an extended-spectrum ß-lactamase (ESBL) and no carbapenemase, 17.9% carried a serine-carbapenemase, and 42.1% were negative for non-intrinsic ß-lactamases. Of 98 CZA-NS+C/T-S isolates, 34.7% carried mutations previously described as causing an upregulation of the MexAB-OprM efflux pump, while only 9.2% carried a non-intrinsic ß-lactamase, and no resistance mechanism was identified in 29.6% of these isolates. MBLs were present in most isolates NS to both agents. More than half of the CZA-S+C/T-NS isolates carried serine ß-lactamases. The most frequently identified resistance mechanism identified in CZA-NS+C/T-S isolates was a marker indicating the upregulation of MexAB-OprM. No mechanism was identified that is thought to support resistance to these agents in numerous isolates. This may be due in part to the fact that whole genome sequencing (WGS) cannot directly measure gene expression of chromosomal resistance mechanisms.

Clinical outcomes and emergence of resistance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections treated with ceftolozane-tazobactam versus ceftazidime-avibactam.

Few studies compare outcomes of patients with difficult-to-treat resistance (DTR) Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections treated with ceftolozane-tazobactam versus ceftazidime-avibactam. A multicenter prospective study was conducted of unique patients with DTR P. aeruginosa infections from 2018 to 2023 receiving >72 h of ceftolozane-tazobactam or ceftazidime-avibactam, with confirmation that the P. aeruginosa isolate was susceptible to the agent administered by broth microdilution. Inverse probability weighting (IPW) incorporating propensity scores was utilized to ensure balanced baseline characteristics. Regression performed on the post-IPW group determined 30-day mortality and subsequent emergence of resistance (i.e., ≥4-fold increase in MIC) to the initial treatment (i.e., ceftolozane-tazobactam or ceftazidime-avibactam). Among 186 eligible patients, 102 (55%) received ceftolozane-tazobactam and 84 (45%) received ceftazidime-avibactam. In the post-IPW cohort, balance was achieved across all variables [e.g., demographics, severity of illness, severe immunocompromise, Charlson Comorbidity Index ≥5, continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT), source of infection, combination therapy]. Thirty-day mortality was similar between the ceftolozane-tazobactam and ceftazidime-avibactam groups [21% vs 17%; adjusted odds ratio (aOR): 1.01 (95% confidence interval, CI: 0.90-1.14)]. Emergence of resistance was higher in the ceftolozane-tazobactam group [38% vs 25%; aOR: 1.89 (95% CI: 0.98-4.88)], but did not achieve statistical significance. Prolonged treatment durations and use of CRRT were associated with increased emergence of resistance (both P = 0.04). Although the survival of patients with DTR P. aeruginosa infections appears similar regardless of whether ceftolozane-tazobactam or ceftazidime-avibactam is prescribed, the emergence of resistance may be more concerning with the former. Plausible mechanistic explanations support these findings. Modifiable risk factors were identified that may mitigate this risk.

Antibiotic Susceptibility of Aerobic and Facultative Anaerobic Gram-Negative Rods in Hong Kong and Implications on Usefulness of Ceftazidime-Avibactam and Ceftolozane-Tazobactam.

Due to the increasing resistance of aerobic and facultative anaerobic Gram-negative rods, ceftazidime-avibactam and ceftolozane-tazobactam have been launched in the market in the last few years. In this study, we analyzed the susceptibility pattern of the major aerobic and facultative anaerobic Gram-negative rods in Hong Kong for ceftazidime-avibactam, ceftolozane-tazobactam, four other broad-spectrum antibiotics commonly used in Hong Kong and colistin. For 300 isolates collected from January to December 2021, non-ESBL-producing Enterobacterales, ESBL-producing Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa were highly susceptible to ceftazidime-avibactam (all 100%) and ceftolozane-tazobactam (98.7%, 99.7% and 94.3%). For 32 archived ESBL-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates collected between January 2014 and March 2023, all were susceptible to ceftazidime-avibactam and ceftolozane-tazobactam. For 101 archived carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales, their susceptibilities to ceftazidime-avibactam and ceftolozane-tazobactam varied depending on the type of carbapenemase produced. Both had high activities against OXA-producing strains (97.1% and 76.5%, respectively) but were 100% resistant for NDM-producing and NDM+OXA-producing strains. All KPC-producing strains were susceptible to ceftazidime-avibactam but resistant to ceftolozane-tazobactam. Ceftazidime-avibactam and ceftolozane-tazobactam are good alternatives for the management of infections caused by ESBL-producing Enterobacterales and selective strains of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales in Hong Kong.

Clinical Outcomes of Ceftazidime-Avibactam versus Ceftolozane-Tazobactam in Managing Pseudomonal Infections in Patients Undergoing Renal Replacement Therapy.

The optimal doses of ceftazidime-avibactam (CZA) and ceftolozane-tazobactam (C/T) for treating multidrug-resistant (MDR) Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PSA) in patients utilizing renal replacement therapy (RRT) are not well established. Hence, the objective of this study is to evaluate the clinical outcomes associated with the suggested doses of CZA and C/T in patients with PSA infection utilizing RRT. METHODS: This is a retrospective study conducted at our hospital between September 2018 and March 2022. Clinical cure was the primary endpoint, while microbiologic cure, 30-day recurrence, and 30-day mortality were the secondary endpoints. RESULTS: In total, 45 subjects met the inclusion criteria, with 25 receiving CZA and 20 receiving C/T. The median age was 69 (52-81) and 69 (61.5-83) years, respectively, while the median weight was 70 (55.5-81.5) and 66 (57-79) kg, respectively. Clinical cure was achieved in 12 (48%) subjects in the CZA group and 12 (60%) in the C/T group (p = 0.432). Of the 36 subjects who had repeated cultures, a microbiologic cure was achieved in 14/23 (60%) subjects and 10/13 (76.9%) subjects (p = 0.273). Thirty-day recurrence was reported in 3 (12%) cases in the CZA group and 6 (30%) in the C/T group (p = 0.082). The 30-day mortality was 13 (52%) subjects in the CZA group and 10 (50%) in the C/T group (p = 0.894). The median maintenance dose of CZA was 1.88 (0.94-3.75) g and 2.25 (1.5-2.25) g for C/T. Multivariate logistic regression analysis indicated that both drugs did not differ significantly in clinical cure. Bloodstream infection (BSI) (OR = 25, 95% CI: 1.63-411.7, p = 0.021) was the only independent factor associated with clinical cure in this population. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicated that C/T and CZA did not significantly differ in achieving clinical cure in patients with MDR PSA infections undergoing RRT. Larger clinical trials are needed to confirm our findings.

Physicochemical Compatibility of Ceftolozane-Tazobactam with Parenteral Nutrition.

Ceftolozane-tazobactam (CT) is used for the treatment of complicated infections and for multidrug-resistant strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing enterobacteria. In certain cases, simultaneous administration of CT and parenteral nutrition (PN) may be required, but compatibility of Y-site co-administration is unknown. The aim of this study was to analyse the physicochemical compatibility of CT Y-site administered with PN. We evaluated a protocolized PN approach for critical patients in our center. We studied both bolus infusion (2 g ceftolozane/1 g tazobactam in 1 h) and continuous infusion (CI) (6 g ceftolozane/3 g tazobactam) strategies. Samples were visually observed against light, microscopically inspected, and pH was analysed using a pH meter. The mean lipid droplet diameter (MDD) was determined via dynamic light scattering. CT concentration was quantified using HPLC-HRMS. No alterations were observed through visual or microscopic inspection. Changes in pH were ≤0.2, and changes in osmolarity were less than 5%. MDD remained below 500 nm (284.5 ± 2.1 for bolus CT and 286.8 ± 7.5 for CI CT). CT concentrations at t = 0 h and t = 24 h remained within prespecified parameters in both infusion strategies. CT is physiochemically compatible with PN during simulated Y-site administration at the tested concentration and infusion rates.

Ceftolozane/tazobactam: Literature review of its activity on Taiwanese isolates before its launch in Taiwan (2012-2021).

Ceftolozane, a novel cephalosporin, combined with tazobactam, a known ß-lactamase inhibitor, shows robust antipseudomonal activity, although it doesn't cover carbapenemases. Our review of data from 2012 to 2021 in Taiwan highlights TOL/TAZ's in-vitro performance. TOL/TAZ is most effective against Pseudomonas aeruginosa (91.3-94.4 % susceptible, with an MIC <4 µg/mL). It also demonstrates good activity against Enterobacterales, including Escherichia coli (88-94.3 % susceptible), Klebsiella pneumoniae (72.6-84.1 % susceptible), Citrobacter koseri (93.3 % susceptible), Klebsiella oxytoca (98.1-100 % susceptible), and Proteus mirabilis (100 % susceptible). However, its efficacy varies among species typically associated with chromosomally-mediated AmpC production, such as Morganella morganii (100 % susceptible), Serratia marcescens (81.3-90.0 % susceptible), Enterobacter cloacae species complex (76.6-76.7 % susceptible), Klebsiella aerogenes (66.7-89.6% susceptible), and Citrobacter freundii (60.0 % susceptible). For carbapenem-nonsusceptible isolates, TOL/TAZ is less effective against K. pneumoniae and E. coli (susceptibility <10 %) but remains useful for P. aeruginosa (susceptibility 81.3-91.8 %). In conclusion, TOL/TAZ shows potent activity against P. aeruginosa and carbapenem-susceptible Enterobacterales in Taiwan.

In vitro activity of ceftolozane/tazobactam against Gram-negative bacilli isolated from pediatric patients: Results from the Study for Monitoring Antimicrobial Resistance Trends (SMART) 2017-2021, China.

OBJECTIVES: Ceftolozane-tazobactam (C/T) is a combination of a cephalosporin and a ß-lactamase inhibitor with activity against Gram-negative bacilli (GNB). The study aims were to evaluate the activity of C/T in vitro vs. comparators against clinical GNB isolated from Chinese paediatric patients. METHODS: From 2017-2021, 660 GNB isolates were collected from 20 hospitals across China. The minimum inhibitory concentrations were tested using a Trek Diagnostic System (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Susceptibility was determined by CLSI broth microdilution and the results were interpreted according to CLSI M100 (2021) breakpoints. RESULTS: GNB isolates were obtained from paediatric patients < 18 years old, mainly from the bloodstream (n = 146), intraperitoneal cavity (n = 138), lower respiratory (n = 278) and urinary tract (n = 96). Overall, C/T was active against 76.6% of 436 Enterobacterales, with a descending susceptibility rate of 100.0% to S. marcescens, 92.2% to E. coli, 83.3% to K. oxytoca, 66.7% to K. aerogenes, 66.7% to P. mirabilis, 58.6% to K. pneumoniae and 57.1% to E. cloacae. The susceptibility of P. aeruginosa to C/T was 89.4%, which was the highest among the ß-lactam antibiotics and was second only to amikacin (92.9%). Isolates of respiratory tract infection (RTI) derived P. aeruginosa were highly susceptible (93.8%) to C/T, while <75% of isolates of RTI derived P. aeruginosa were susceptible to the other ß-lactam antibiotics tested, except for ceftazidime-avibactam (91.2%). CONCLUSION: GNBs collected from paediatric patients in China showed a high susceptibility to C/T making this drug combination an effective choice for treating the paediatric population, especially those infected with P. aeruginosa.

In vitro activity of cefiderocol against European Enterobacterales, including isolates resistant to meropenem and recentß-lactam/ß-lactamase inhibitor combinations.

Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales represent a major health threat and have few approved therapeutic options. Enterobacterales isolates were collected from hospitalized inpatients from 49 sites in six European countries (1 January-31 December 2020) and underwent susceptibility testing to cefiderocol and ß-lactam/ß-lactamase inhibitor combinations. Meropenem-resistant (MIC >8 mg/L) and cefiderocol-susceptible isolates were analyzed by PCR, and cefiderocol-|resistant isolates by whole-genome sequencing, to identify resistance mechanisms. Overall, 1,909 isolates (including 970 Klebsiella spp., 382 Escherichia coli, and 244 Enterobacter spp.) were collected, commonly from bloodstream infections (43.6%). Cefiderocol susceptibility was higher than approved ß-lactam/ß-lactamase inhibitor combinations and largely comparable to cefepime-taniborbactam and aztreonam-avibactam against all Enterobacterales (98.1% vs 78.1%-|97.4% and 98.7%-99.1%, respectively) and Enterobacterales resistant to meropenem (n = 148, including 125 Klebsiella spp.; 87.8% vs 0%-71.6% and 93.2%-98.6%, respectively), ß-lactam/ß-lactamase inhibitor combinations (66.7%-|92.1% vs 0%-|88.1% and 66.7%-97.9%, respectively), and to both meropenem and ß-|lactam/ß-lactamase inhibitor combinations (61.9%-65.9% vs 0%-|20.5% and 76.2%-97.7%, respectively). Susceptibilities to approved and developmental ß-lactam/ß-lactamase inhibitor combinations against cefiderocol-resistant Enterobacterales (n = 37) were 10.8%-|56.8% and 78.4%-94.6%, respectively. Most meropenem-resistant Enterobacterales harbored Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (110/148) genes, although metallo-ß-lactamase (35/148) and oxacillinase (OXA) carbapenemase (6/148) genes were less common; cefiderocol susceptibility was retained in ß-lactamase producers, other than NDM, AmpC, and non-carbapenemase OXA producers. Most cefiderocol-resistant Enterobacterales had multiple resistance mechanisms, including ≥1 iron uptake-related mutation (37/37), carbapenemase gene (33/37), and ftsI mutation (24/37). The susceptibility to cefiderocol was higher than approved ß-lac|tam/ß-lactamase inhibitor combinations against European Enterobacterales, including meropenem- and ß-lactam/ß-lactamase inhibitor combination-resistant isolates. IMPORTANCE: This study collected a notably large number of Enterobacterales isolates from Europe, including meropenem- and ß-lactam/ß-lactamase inhibitor combination-resistant isolates against which the in vitro activities of cefiderocol and developmental ß-lactam/ß-lactamase inhibitor combinations were directly compared for the first time. The MIC breakpoint for high-dose meropenem was used to define meropenem resistance, so isolates that would remain meropenem resistant with doses clinically available to patients were included in the data. Susceptibility to cefiderocol, as a single active compound, was high against Enterobacterales and was higher than or comparable to available ß-lactam/ß-lactamase inhibitor combinations. These results provide insights into the treatment options for infections due to Enterobacterales with resistant phenotypes. Early susceptibility testing of cefiderocol in parallel with ß-lactam/ß-lactamase inhibitor combinations will allow patients to receive the most appropriate treatment option(s) available in a timely manner. This is particularly important when options are more limited, such as against metallo-ß-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales.

Activity of Aztreonam/Avibactam and Recently Approved ß-Lactamase Inhibitor Combinations against Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa from Intensive Care Unit and Non-Intensive Care Unit Patients.

We evaluated the activities of aztreonam/avibactam and recently approved ß-lactamase inhibitor combinations (BLICs) to compare the antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolated from intensive care unit (ICU) and non-ICU patients. Clinical isolates (1/patient) were consecutively collected from 72 United States medical centres in 2020-2022 and susceptibility tested by broth microdilution. The results for 5421 isolates from ICU patients were analysed and compared to those for 20,649 isolates from non-ICU patients. Isolates from ventilator-associated pneumonia patients were analysed separately. Aztreonam/avibactam inhibited 100.0%/>99.9% Enterobacterales and 100.0%/98.3% of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) from ICU/non-ICU patients at ≤8 mg/L, respectively. The CRE susceptibility rates were 88.5%/82.9% for ceftazidime/avibactam, 82.1%/81.2% for meropenem/vaborbactam, and 78.2%/72.6% for imipenem/relebactam among ICU/non-ICU isolates. Among the P. aeruginosa isolates from ICU/non-ICU patients, the susceptibility rates were 96.3%/97.6% for ceftazidime/avibactam, 97.2/98.4% for ceftolozane/tazobactam, 97.1%/98.0% for imipenem/relebactam, 77.8%/84.6% for piperacillin/tazobactam, and 76.9%/85.8% for meropenem; aztreonam/avibactam inhibited 78.0%/81.9% of P. aeruginosa at ≤8 mg/L. In summary, lower susceptibility rates were observed among ICU than non-ICU isolates. Aztreonam/avibactam exhibited potent in vitro activity and broad-spectrum activity against Enterobacterales from ICU and non-ICU patients, including CRE and isolates non-susceptible to newer BLICs. Against P. aeruginosa, aztreonam/avibactam showed a spectrum of activity comparable to that of piperacillin/tazobactam, meropenem, and ceftazidime.

Rates of resistance to ceftazidime-avibactam and ceftolozane-tazobactam among patients treated for multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa bacteremia or pneumonia.

Among consecutive patients with multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa bacteremia or pneumonia we found those treated with ceftazidime-avibactam were more likely to develop resistance (defined as ≥4-fold increased MIC) than those treated with ceftolozane-tazobactam (40% vs. 10%; P=0.002). Ceftazidime-avibactam resistance was associated with new mutations in ampC and efflux regulatory pathways.

Activity of ceftolozane/tazobactam and imipenem/relebactam against clinical isolates of Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa collected in Greece and Italy-SMART 2017-2021.

PURPOSE: The current study evaluated the in vitro activities of ceftolozane/tazobactam (C/T), imipenem/relebactam (IMI/REL), and comparators against recent (2017-2021) clinical isolates of gram-negative bacilli from two countries in southern Europe. METHODS: Nine clinical laboratories (two in Greece; seven in Italy) each collected up to 250 consecutive gram-negative isolates per year from lower respiratory tract, intraabdominal, urinary tract, and bloodstream infection samples. MICs were determined by the CLSI broth microdilution method and interpreted using 2022 EUCAST breakpoints. ß-lactamase genes were identified in select ß-lactam-nonsusceptible isolate subsets. RESULTS: C/T inhibited the growth of 85-87% of Enterobacterales and 94-96% of ESBL-positive non-CRE NME (non-Morganellaceae Enterobacterales) isolates from both countries. IMI/REL inhibited 95-98% of NME, 100% of ESBL-positive non-CRE NME, and 98-99% of KPC-positive NME isolates from both countries. Country-specific differences in percent susceptible values for C/T, IMI/REL, meropenem, piperacillin/tazobactam, levofloxacin, and amikacin were more pronounced for Pseudomonas aeruginosa than Enterobacterales. C/T and IMI/REL both inhibited 84% of P. aeruginosa isolates from Greece and 91-92% of isolates from Italy. MBL rates were estimated as 4% of Enterobacterales and 10% of P. aeruginosa isolates from Greece compared to 1% of Enterobacterales and 3% of P. aeruginosa isolates from Italy. KPC rates among Enterobacterales isolates were similar in both countries (7-8%). OXA-48-like enzymes were only identified in Enterobacterales isolates from Italy (1%) while GES carbapenemase genes were only identified in P. aeruginosa isolates from Italy (2%). CONCLUSION: We conclude that C/T and IMI/REL may provide viable treatment options for many patients from Greece and Italy.

Friends or foes? Novel antimicrobials tackling MDR/XDR Gram-negative bacteria: a systematic review.

Gram-negative bacteria have been one of the most studied classes in the field of microbiology, especially in the context of globally alarming antimicrobial resistance levels to these pathogens over the course of the past decades. With high numbers of these microorganisms being described as multidrug-resistant (MDR), or even extended-drug-resistant (XDR) bacteria, specialists in the field have been struggling to keep up with higher prevalence of difficult-to-treat infections caused by such superbugs. The FDA approval of novel antimicrobials, such as cefiderocol (FDC), ceftolozane/tazobactam (C/T), ceftazidime/avibactam (CZA), imipenem/relebactam (IMR), sulbactam/durlobactam (SUL-DUR) and phase 3 clinical trials' results of aztreonam/avibactam (ATM-AVI) has proven that, while all these substances provide encouraging efficacy rates, antibiotic resistance keeps up with the pace of drug development. Microorganisms have developed more extensive mechanisms of resistance in order to target the threat posed by these novel antimicrobials, thus equiring researchers to be on a constant lookout for other potential drug candidates and molecule development. However, these strategies require a proper understanding of bacterial resistance mechanisms to gain a comprehensive outlook on the issue. The present review aims to highlight these six antibiotic agents, which have brought hope to clinicians during the past decade, discussing general properties of these substances, as well as mechanisms and patterns of resistance, while also providing a short overview on further directions in the field. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/#searchadvanced, Identifier CRD42024505832.

Novel Siderophore Cephalosporin and Combinations of Cephalosporins with ß-Lactamase Inhibitors as an Advancement in Treatment of Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia.

In an era of increasing antibiotic resistance among pathogens, the treatment options for infectious diseases are diminishing. One of the clinical groups especially vulnerable to this threat are patients who are hospitalized in intensive care units due to ventilator-associated pneumonia caused by multidrug-resistant/extensively drug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria. In order to prevent the exhaustion of therapeutic options for this life-threatening condition, there is an urgent need for new pharmaceuticals. Novel ß-lactam antibiotics, including combinations of cephalosporins with ß-lactamase inhibitors, are proposed as a solution to this escalating problem. The unique mechanism of action, distinctive to this new group of siderophore cephalosporins, can overcome multidrug resistance, which is raising high expectations. In this review, we present the summarized results of clinical trials, in vitro studies, and case studies on the therapeutic efficacy of cefoperazone-sulbactam, ceftolozane-tazobactam, ceftazidime-avibactam, and cefiderocol in the treatment of ventilator-associated pneumonia. We demonstrate that treatment strategies based on siderophore cephalosporins and combinations of ß-lactams with ß-lactamases inhibitors show comparable or higher clinical efficacy than those used with classic pharmaceuticals, like carbapenems, colistin, or tigecycline, and are often associated with a lower risk of adverse events.

In vitro activity of antibiotics potentially effective against difficult-to-treat strains of Gram-negative rods: retrospective study.

Bacterial resistance surveillance is one of the main outputs of microbiological laboratories and its results are important part of antimicrobial stewardship (AMS). In this study, the susceptibility of specific bacteria to selected antimicrobial agents was tested. The susceptibility of 90 unique isolates of pathogens of critical priority obtained from clinically valid samples of ICU patients in 2017-2021 was tested. 50% of these fulfilled difficult-to-treat resistance (DTR) criteria and 50% were susceptible to all antibiotics included in the definition. 10 Enterobacterales strains met DTR criteria, and 2 (20%) were resistant to colistin (COL), 2 (20%) to cefiderocol (FCR), 7 (70%) to imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam (I/R), 3 (30%) to ceftazidime/avibactam (CAT) and 5 (50%) to fosfomycin (FOS). For Enterobacterales we also tested aztreonam/avibactam (AZA) for which there are no breakpoints yet. The highest MIC of AZA observed was 1 mg/l, MIC range in the susceptible cohort was 0.032-0.064 mg/l and in the DTR cohort (incl. class B beta-lactamase producers) it was 0.064-1 mg/l. Two (13.3%) isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa (15 DTR strains) were resistant to COL, 1 (6.7%) to FCR, 13 (86.7%) to I/R, 5 (33.3%) to CAT, and 5 (33.3%) to ceftolozane/tazobactam. All isolates of Acinetobacter baumannii with DTR were susceptible to COL and FCR, and at the same time resistant to I/R and ampicillin/sulbactam. New antimicrobial agents are not 100% effective against DTR. Therefore, it is necessary to perform susceptibility testing of these antibiotics, use the data for surveillance (including local surveillance) and conform to AMS standards.

Intravenous fosfomycin in combination regimens as a treatment option for difficult-to-treat infections due to multi-drug-resistant Gram-negative organisms: A real-life experience.

AIM: To investigate the efficacy of intravenous (IV) fosfomycin as combination therapy for treatment of difficult-to-treat (DTT) acute and subacute infections with multi-drug-resistant (MDR) Gram-negative bacteria (GNB), and risk factors associated with 90-day mortality. METHODS: A retrospective, observational, monocentric study enrolled patients treated with IV fosfomycin in combination regimens (≥72 h) for proven DTT-MDR-GNB infection. Multi-variate regression analysis identified independent risk factors for 90-day mortality. A propensity score for receiving fosfomycin was performed to control for confounding factors. RESULTS: In total, 70 patients were included in this study: 54.3% had carbapenem-resistant isolates, 31.4% had ceftazidime/avibactam-resistant isolates and 28.6% had ceftolozane/tazobactam-resistant isolates. The main pathogens were Pseudomonas aeruginosa (57.1%) and Klebsiella pneumoniae (22.9%). The most prevalent infections were nosocomial pneumonia (42.9%), osteomyelitis (17.1%) and intra-abdominal infections. All-cause 30- and 90-day mortality were 15.7% and 31.4%, respectively (18.9% and 50% considering acute DTT-MDR-GNB infections alone). Relapse at 30 days occurred in 22.9% of cases (29% with emergence of fosfomycin resistance). Mortality at 90 days was independently associated with septic shock and ceftolozane/tazobactam resistance. The relationship between resistance to ceftolozane/tazobactam and 90-day mortality was confirmed to be significant after adjustment by propensity score analysis (hazard ratio 5.84, 95% confidence interval 1.65-20.68; P=0.006). CONCLUSIONS: Fosfomycin seems to be a promising salvage, combination treatment in DTT-MDR-GNB infections. Resistance to ceftolozane/tazobactam seems to be independently associated with treatment failure. Randomized clinical trials focusing on pathogen and infection sites are needed urgently to demonstrate the superiority of fosfomycin in combination with other agents for the resolution of DTT-MDR-GNB infections.