Decoding the variability in clinical and laboratory profiles of Chronic Inducible Urticaria vs. Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria - a retrospective study from a tertiary care center.

Chronic inducible urticaria (CIndU) is characterized by wheals and/or angioedema for longer than 6 weeks induced by specific triggers. The data regarding epidemiology of CIndU is scarce with limited available literature on urticaria severity, investigations, and treatment responses in CIndU compared to CSU. We performed a retrospective chart review of all CIndU patients(cases) enrolled in our Urticaria clinic, past seven years between January 2017 to December 2023. Equal number of CSU patients enrolled during study period were taken as controls. Patients with absence of weals and both CSU and CIndU were excluded from the study. Urticaria severity was assessed by Urticaria activity score over 7 days (UAS7). Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS V29 with P < 0.05 as significant. Out of all records screened, 222 CIndU (cases) and 226 CSU (controls) were eligible based on complete availability of data. Both groups were comparable in terms of age and gender with slight female preponderance. Mean UAS7 at baseline was comparable(p = 0.619) between two groups [(11.49 ± 10.37 in CIndU vs. 10.9 ± 12.2 in CSU)]. The mean CRP (mg/dl) levels for CIndU vs. CSU patients was 2.8 ± 4.2 vs. 6.9 ± 11.2 (p < 0.001). Serum D-dimer levels (mg/dl) were also significant between cases(167 ± 220) and controls(265 ± 452) (p = 0.020). The quality of life assessed by CU-QOL score was 9.39 ± 9.5 in CIndU vs. 16 ± 14.8 in CSU (p < 0.001). 80% of CIndU patients and 52% of CSU patients required updosing of antihistamines upto 4 times and the difference was statistically significant between two groups(p = < 0.001). The mean time taken to achieve remission i.e. UAS7 = 0 (T0) was 60 ± 42 days amongst CIndU while it was shorter in CSU (27.77 ± 27 days) (p < 0.001).Amongst all CIndU cases, commonest subtypes were symptomatic dermographism (SD) (39.5%) followed by cholinergic urticaria(4.2%) and cold urticaria(1.8%). Our study underscores the distinct clinical and laboratory profiles between CIndU and CSU patients. CIndU patients exhibit poorer response to standard antihistamine doses, requiring more frequent updosing and longer treatment duration. The time to attain remission as assessed by UAS7 score was also longer in CIndU patients than CSU patients (mean difference of 33 days). Further research is warranted to elucidate the underlying mechanisms and explore targeted treatment approaches for CIndU.

Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria: Current and Emerging Biologic Agents.

Antihistamine refractory chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) has a prevalence of up to 50%. Anti-immunoglobulin E (IgE) therapies have revolutionized management of CSU, yet refractory cases persist, suggesting a role for biologic agents that impact alternative routes of mast cell stimulation independent of cross-linking at FcεR1. This review addresses anti-IgE and Th2-targeted therapies in the management of CSU. In addition, we explore novel treatments targeting alternative pathways of mast cell activation including MAS-related G protein-coupled receptor-X2 and sialic acid-binding immunoglobulin-like lectin-6, inhibiting intracellular signaling via Bruton's tyrosine kinase, and disrupting KIT activation by SCF.

Efficacy and safety of switching to bilastine, an H1-antihistamine, in patients with refractory chronic spontaneous urticaria (H1-SWITCH): a multicenter, open-label, randomized, parallel-group comparative study.

Background: For treating patients with refractory chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) resistant to standard doses of 2nd generation H1-antihistamines (H1AH) the International and Japanese guidelines recommend increasing H1AH dose. The latter also recommends switching to a different H1AH. This study explored if the efficacy of the standard dose of bilastine 20 mg is non-inferior to that of double-dose of H1AH in patients with refractory CSU. Methods: This phase IV, multicenter, open-label, randomized, parallel-group trial evaluated the efficacy and safety of switching treatment to bilastine compared to treatment with a 2-fold dose of H1AH in patients with CSU refractory to standard dose H1AH. The primary endpoint was the mean total symptom score (TSS) at Day 5-7 after the start of administration. Results: Treatment efficacy and safety were evaluated in 128 patients (bilastine, n=64; 2-fold dose of H1AH, n=64). The mean TSS at Day 5-7 after the start of administration was smaller than the non-inferiority margin of 0.8, demonstrating non-inferiority of the bilastine switching group to the double-dose H1AH group (0.17 (95% CI -0.32, 0.67)). No difference in Japanese version of Epworth Sleepiness Scale (JESS), DLQI, and urticaria activity score over 7 consecutive days (UAS7) was observed between the two groups. There were no serious adverse events in either group. H1AH-related adverse events occurred in 5 subjects (8 cases) and 2 subjects (3 cases) in the double-dose H1AH and bilastine groups, respectively. Conclusions: Switching treatment to bilastine demonstrated non-inferiority to a double-dose of H1AH in terms of efficacy in patients with CSU refractory to standard dose H1AH with a favorable safety profile. Clinical trial registration: https://jrct.niph.go.jp/latest-detail/jRCTs051180105, identifier jRCTs051180105.

Case report of secondary T-cell deficiency following the AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine.

We present a case of secondary T-cell deficiency particularly affecting CD4 T cells, along with the emergence of chronic spontaneous urticaria in a patient following COVID-19 vaccination. The condition was partially managed with omalizumab after initial first-line therapy proved ineffective.

Validity, reliability and responsiveness of digital visual analogue scales for chronic spontaneous urticaria monitoring: A CRUSE® mobile health study.

BACKGROUND: CRUSE® is an app that allows patients with chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) to monitor their daily disease activity through the use of visual analogue scales (VASs). We aimed to determine the concurrent validity, reliability, responsiveness and minimal important difference (MID) of CRUSE® VASs. METHODS: We evaluated the properties of three daily VASs: VAS for how much patients were affected by their CSU ('VAS urticaria'), VAS for the impact of urticaria on work/school productivity ('VAS productivity') and the VAS of EQ-5D. Concurrent validity was assessed by measuring the association between each VAS and the Urticaria Activity Score (UAS). Intra-rater reliability was determined based on the data of users providing multiple daily questionnaires within the same day. Test-retest reliability and responsiveness (ability to change), respectively, were tested in clinically stable and clinically unstable users. MIDs were determined using distribution-based methods. RESULTS: We included 5938 patients (67,380 days). Concurrent validity was high, with VAS urticaria being more strongly associated with the UAS score than the remaining VASs. Intra-rater reliability was also high, with intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) being above 0.950 for all VASs. Moderate-high test-retest reliability and responsiveness were observed, with reliability ICC being highest for VAS EQ-5D and responsiveness being highest for VAS urticaria. The MID for VAS urticaria was 17 (out of 100) units, compared to 15 units for VAS productivity and 11 units for VAS EQ-5D. CONCLUSION: Daily VASs for CSU available in the CRUSE® app display high concurrent validity and intra-rater reliability and moderate-high test-retest reliability and responsiveness.

Autoimmune Mast Cell Activation Test as a Diagnostic Tool in Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria.

Chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) is associated with skin mast cell activation, and its triggering mechanisms are not completely elucidated. Evidence suggests an autoimmune component of CSU. Our aim was to assess the usefulness of an autoimmune mast cell activation test (aiMAT) for diagnosing and differentiating CSU into different subtypes. We enrolled 43 patients with active, uncontrolled CSU before starting treatment with omalizumab and 15 controls. Patients were evaluated based on omalizumab response. aiMATs were performed using non-IgE-sensitized (NS) or myeloma IgE-sensitized (S) LAD2 cells, which were then stimulated with CSU/control sera (25 µL and 10 µL). The expression of CD63 was assessed with flow cytometry. CD63 response on NS-LAD2 was significantly increased in CSU patients compared to controls after the stimulation with 25 µL CSU/control sera (p = 0.0007) and with 10 µL CSU/control sera (p = 0.0001). The ROC curve analysis demonstrated an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.82. The cutoff for autoimmune-non-IgE-sensitized-MAT was 40.3% CD63+ LAD2, which resulted in 73.3% sensitivity and 81.4% specificity. CD63 response on S-LAD2 was significantly increased in CSU patients compared to controls after the stimulation with 25 µL CSU/control sera (p = 0.03). The ROC curve analysis demonstrated an AUC of 0.66. The cutoff for the autoimmune-myeloma IgE-sensitized-MAT was 58.4% CD63+ cells, which resulted in 62.8% sensitivity and 66.7% specificity. Overall, 36 out of 43 (84%) patients responded to omalizumab, and 7 (16%) were nonresponders. We found no differences between LAD2 CD63 response and response to omalizumab. In conclusion, aiMAT could represent a new diagnostic tool in CSU. Additional studies are needed to evaluate the potential benefits during omalizumab therapy.

An Open-Label, Investigator-Initiated, Single-Centre Pilot Study to Determine the Safety and Efficacy of Tofacitinib in Resistant Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria.

Background: Chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) is a distressing skin condition characterized by the recurrent appearance of itchy hives. A subset of CSU patients remains resistant to conventional treatment with high-dose antihistamines. Tofacitinib, a Janus kinase inhibitor, has shown promise in various inflammatory skin diseases. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of oral tofacitinib in patients with CSU resistant to antihistamines. Methods: This study examined data retrospectively from seven patients who were diagnosed with CSU and were treated with tofacitinib for at least six months. These patients initially exhibited resistance to treatment with four-fold up-dosed antihistamines. One of the patients was already on omalizumab, and another was tried on cyclosporine. The patients were administered oral tofacitinib at a dosage of 5 mg twice daily for six months. Patients were followed up monthly for disease control and side effects. The response to treatment was evaluated using the urticaria activity score over 7 days (UAS7) and urticaria control test (UCT). Paired t-tests were conducted to determine the statistical significance of the results using SPSS version 25 software. Results: Six out of the seven patients demonstrated a significant improvement in both UAS7 and UCT scores after six months of treatment with oral tofacitinib. The mean UAS7 score decreased from 24.86 at baseline to 3.83 at the study endpoint (P < 0.0001). Similarly, the mean UCT score increased from 0.57 at baseline to 14 at the study endpoint (P < 0.0001). The standard deviations for both measures were 4.85 and 0.98 at baseline and 3.1 and 3.1 at the study endpoint for UAS7 and UCT, respectively. Conclusion: In this six-month follow-up study, oral tofacitinib demonstrated significant efficacy in treating CSU patients' resistant to high-dose antihistamines. Most patients experienced a remarkable reduction in urticaria activity and an improvement in disease control. These findings suggest that tofacitinib holds promise as a potential therapeutic option for this challenging subset of CSU patients. However, larger, randomized controlled trials are warranted to further investigate the long-term safety and effectiveness of tofacitinib in this population.

Omalizumab for the Treatment of Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria in Adults and Adolescents: An Eight-Year Real-Life Experience.

Background: Omalizumab, an anti-IgE monoclonal antibody, is an effective treatment for patients with chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) resistant to antihistamines, but about 10% are unresponsive. Our aim was to assess the effectiveness, safety, and drug survival (DS) of omalizumab by considering clinical and laboratory characteristics. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study on 296 patients with severe CSU treated with omalizumab. Disease activity, comorbidities, and serum levels of total IgE and anti-thyroid autoantibodies were evaluated over a period of up to 8 years. DS was analyzed using unadjusted Kaplan-Meier survival curves. When applicable, the risk of discontinuation was assessed using Cox regression analysis. Results: Out of 296 patients, 118 (40.4%) were early responders, 72 (25.0%) were late responders, 76 (26.0%) were partial responders, and 25 (8.6%) were non-responders. Early responders were more likely to be patients without associated inducible urticaria (p = 0.021, χ2 = 9.692), without autoimmune thyroiditis (p = 0.007, χ2 = 12.037), and those with higher IgE levels (p = 0.039, χ2 = 8.385). Overall, DS was 53.5% at 8 years, primarily due to clinical remission. DS due to inefficacy and clinical remission were 83.9% and 62.1%, respectively, at 8 years. No patients discontinued omalizumab due to adverse events. Patients with normal IgE levels (p = 0.012, HR = 4.639, CI: 1.393-15.445) and those with autoimmune thyroiditis (p = 0.028, HR = 3.316, CI: 1.128-8.718) had a higher risk of discontinuing omalizumab due to inefficacy. Conclusions: This study confirms the long-term effectiveness and safety of omalizumab in the treatment of CSU over a period of up to 8 years. Most patients discontinued omalizumab due to clinical remission, while only 5.1% discontinued it due to ineffectiveness.

Long term safety and efficacy of ligelizumab in the treatment of Japanese patients with chronic spontaneous urticaria.

BACKGROUND: In Japan, urticaria is a common skin disorder with chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) being the most frequent subtype. This study evaluated the safety of ligelizumab (anti-IgE monoclonal antibody) in Japanese CSU patients. METHODS: This was a Phase 3 multicenter, open-label, single-arm 52-week study in adult Japanese patients with CSU inadequately controlled with locally approved doses of H1-antihistamines. The primary objective reported the safety of ligelizumab 120 mg subcutaneously every 4 weeks, by evaluation of treatment emergent adverse events (TEAE). Secondary objectives evaluated efficacy by absolute change from baseline (CFB) in weekly urticaria activity score (UAS7), and the proportion of patients with UAS7 = 0, and dermatology life quality index (DLQI) = 0-1 over time. RESULTS: From a total of 66 CSU patients (80.3% females; mean ± SD age 46.4 ± 13.2 years; mean ± SD baseline UAS7 28.7 ± 6.5) enrolled, 53 patients (80.3%) reported ≥1 TEAE during the study, with no severe or serious adverse events, no anaphylaxis events and low frequency of TEAEs leading to treatment discontinuations (6.1%). Absolute mean CFB of UAS7 showed a rapid onset of response at Week 4 (-14.2) with further improvement until end of treatment at Week 52 (-22.9). The proportion of patients achieving UAS7 = 0 improved over time (14.5% at Week 4; 50.0% at Week 52). A sizable proportion of patients achieved DLQI 0-1 with the first dose of ligelizumab (38.5%), and improvements observed throughout the study until Week 52 (68.8%). CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with ligelizumab 120 mg was well-tolerated with mild to moderate adverse events and was efficacious in Japanese patients.

Epidemiological and clinical characteristics of adult patients with chronic spontaneous urticaria in Latvia: insights from a two-centre study.

Chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) significantly impacts the quality of life of affected individuals. This study aimed to elucidate the epidemiological and clinical profiles of adult CSU patients in Latvia. Patient interviews and electronic medical records from two study centres in Riga, Latvia, were reviewed. PROMs, including UCT, UAS7, USS, and CU-Q2oL, were used to assess disease control, activity, severity, and quality of life. Statistical analysis was performed using Jamovi v. 2.3.28 and IBM SPSS v. 29.0.0.0. The cohort included 140 CSU patients (76.4% female; mean age 41.3 ± 14.9 years), mostly urban residents (87.1%) and non-smokers (53.6%). Urticaria with angioedema occurred in 52.1% and isolated urticaria in 47.9%, with 40% experiencing CSU for 1-5 years. Accompanying symptoms were reported by 63% and triggers by 72.9%. Allergy history and autoimmune disease diagnosis were noted in 49.3% and 29.3%. Treatment mainly involved second-generation antihistamines (85.7%) and omalizumab (17.9%). Mean scores for USS, UCT, and UAS7 were 28.8 (SD: 17.8), 8.2 (SD: 3.7), and 17.2 (SD: 14.1). UAS7 indicated severe CSU in 28.6%, and UCT suggested poorly controlled disease in 77.9%. CU-Q2oL total scores revealed mental status as the most affected domain (mean score: 51.7, SD: 28.7), with a significant association between accompanying symptoms and questionnaire scores. This study provides insights into the demographic and clinical aspects of CSU patients in Latvia, highlighting areas for potential improvement in patient care and emphasizing the need for further investigation into treatment outcomes and patient quality of life.

A comprehensive analysis on the safety of two biologics dupilumab and omalizumab.

Dupilumab was approved for the treatment of several dermatologic immune-mediated inflammatory diseases, such as atopic dermatitis and bullous pemphigoid; whereas omalizumab is the first biological agent which was approved to treat chronic spontaneous urticaria. None of the published meta-analyses has provided the sufficient data regarding the safety of these two biologics, especially regarding their potential serious adverse events (SAEs). The aim of this study was, to comprehensively evaluate the safety of the two biologics dupilumab and omalizumab. In this study, we included 32 randomized trials, and performed meta-analyses on 113 types of SAEs regarding dupilumab and 61 types of SAEs regarding omalizumab. We identified that: (1) use of dupilumab was significantly associated with the lower incidence of atopic dermatitis, while use of omalizumab was significantly associated with the lower incidence of asthma; and (2) use of dupilumab was not significantly associated with the incidences of 112 other kinds of SAEs including various infectious diseases, while use of omalizumab was not significantly associated with the incidences of 60 other kinds of SAEs including various infectious diseases. This meta-analysis for the first time assessed the association between use of dupilumab or omalizumab and incidences of various SAEs, and identified that neither dupilumab use nor omalizumab use was associated with the increased risks of any SAEs including various infectious diseases. These findings further confirm the general safety of the two biologics dupilumab and omalizumab. This informs clinicians that there is no need to worry too much about the safety issues of these two biologics.

Assessment of ELR, PLR, NLR and BLR Ratios during Omalizumab Treatment of Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria.

Background: There is a need for searching for biomarkers indicating patients who will benefit the most from treatment with omalizumab for chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU). The aim of this study was to assess whether the eosinophil/neutrophil/platelet/basophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (ELR, NLR, PLR, BLR) may predict the response to omalizumab treatment of chronic spontaneous urticaria. Methods: A retrospective data analysis of CSU patients treated s-c with 300 mg of omalizumab every four weeks under the drug program was carried out. NLR, ELR, PLR and BLR, DLQI, UAS-7, CRP, anti-TPO and tIgE were assessed before (V0) and after three (V3) and six months (V6) of treatment. Results: Among 52 patients with CSU, 21 were responders, 24 were partially responders and 6 were non-responders to treatment with 300 mg omalizumab every four weeks. An amount of 18 patients had features of type I autoallergic CSU (CSUaiTI) and 34 patients had autoimmunity type IIb CSU with mast cell-directed activating autoantibodies (CSUaiTIIb). NLR, ELR, PLR and BLR indices did not change during a six-month-course of biological treatment. Initial values of ELR and BLR were significantly correlated with the initial tIgE level and anti-TPO/IgE ratio. Initial values of NLR, ELR and BLR were significantly correlated with initial CRP. Comparisons between type I autoallergic CSU (CSUaiTI) and autoimmunity type IIb CSU (CSUaiTIIb) revealed that the absolute number and percentage of eosinophils, basophils, BLR and tIgE were significantly higher in type CSUaiTI and anti-TPO and anti-TPO/IgE were significantly lower in type CSUaiTI. Conclusions: NLR, ELR, PLR and BLR do not change significantly during six months of omalizumab treatment and do not appear to be useful in predicting its efficacy.

A Prospective Randomized Non-Blinded Study of Safety and Efficacy of Bilastine Up-Dosing (40 mg) Versus Combination of Bilastine 20 mg With Levocetirizine 5 mg in the Treatment of Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria.

Introduction: Chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) is the most commonly diagnosed skin condition in dermatology outpatient departments. Second-generation antihistamines are shown to be effective in the control of CSU. As per the guidelines, a combination of antihistamines is less recommended due to the lack of synergistic effect, though used widely. Exploring effective treatment options are crucial, given the challenges posed by CSU. Aims and Objectives: To assess the safety and efficacy of Bilastine up-dosing versus combination of 20 mg Bilastine with 5 mg Levocetirizine in the treatment of CSU. Materials and Methods: This prospective randomized non-blinded comparative trial involved 62 patients, with 32 in group A and 30 in group B. Group A received Tablet Bilastine 20 mg bd, while Group B received a combination of Tablet Bilastine 20 mg and Tablet Levocetirizine 5 mg. Urticarial Activity Score 7 was performed at baseline and follow-up visits (every 2 weeks for 6 weeks). Results: Both groups had a higher number of male patients in the 20-30 years age group. Angioedema was present in 15.6% of group A and 23.3% in group B. After 6 weeks, both the groups showed a significant improvement in UAS 7 scores (P value <0.05). Group A demonstrated a remarkable reduction in UAS 7 from 19.4% to 0.03% with minimal side effects. Conclusion: Bilastine up-dosing proved to be efficient, secure, and well tolerated when compared to the combined dose of Levocetirizine 5 mg and Bilastine 20 mg, suggesting that up-dosing of Bilastine could be a valuable addition to the current medication arsenal with the minimal side effects.

Does angioedema in patients with chronic spontaneous urticaria impact response to omalizumab?

The presence of angioedema, or deep skin swelling, in addition to hives (wheals) in patients with chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) can complicate disease management. There is evidence that omalizumab is effective for patients with CSU with angioedema, but the time to a clinically meaningful response has not been assessed. This post hoc analysis examined data from the phase 3, randomized, double-blind ASTERIA I and ASTERIA II studies: patients with CSU with hives were grouped by presence (n = 216) or absence of angioedema (n = 265) at baseline. The time to minimally important difference (MID, change from baseline of ≥11 points) in weekly Urticaria Activity Score (UAS7) was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier analyses. Median time to MID for omalizumab 300 mg was similar in patients with and without angioedema. Median time to MID for omalizumab 150 mg was similar to 300 mg for patients without angioedema, and was longer for patients with angioedema. Therefore, the response to omalizumab for patients with CSU with angioedema was dose dependent. We recommend that the best approach for clinicians, in line with guidelines, would be initial administration of omalizumab 300 mg every 4 weeks for all patients. Clinical trials registration: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT01287117 (registered 27 January 2011) and NCT01292473 (registered 7 February 2011).

Omalizumab in Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria: A Real-World Study on Effectiveness, Safety and Predictors of Treatment Outcome.

Background: Although omalizumab has shown success in treating chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) patients unresponsive to antihistamines, the exact mechanism of action and predictive markers of response remain unclear. Purpose: The aim of this study was to examine the correlation between baseline levels of biomarkers and clinical parameters with omalizumab response and response rate in patients with CSU. Methods: This retrospective study included 82 adult CSU patients who received omalizumab 300mg every 4 weeks for 16 weeks between January 2022 and December 2023. Treatment response was assessed using UAS7 and DLQI scores at baseline and weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16. Responders were defined as patients achieving UAS7 < 7, with early and late responders categorized based on response within or after 4 weeks, respectively. Baseline clinical features and laboratory biomarkers were compared between responders and non-responders. Results: The overall response rate was 71.95% (59/82), with 23 early responders and 36 late responders. Responders had significantly lower baseline UAS7 (median: 28 vs 35, P < 0.01), DLQI (median: 8 vs 15, P < 0.001), and IL-17 levels (median: 0.53 vs 1.26 pg/mL, P < 0.001) compared to non-responders. Baseline UAS7 > 31, DLQI > 9.5, and IL-17 > 0.775 pg/mL predicted non-response with sensitivities of 78.26%, 100%, and 78.26%, and specificities of 67.8%, 59.32%, and 72.88%, respectively. ASST positivity and comorbid allergic diseases were associated with early response (P < 0.05). Adverse events were reported in 6.09% of patients, including mild injection site reactions and transient urticaria exacerbation, not requiring treatment discontinuation. Conclusion: This study suggests that omalizumab is an effective and safe treatment option for antihistamine-refractory CSU. Baseline UAS7, DLQI, ASST status, serum total IgE levels, and IL-17 may serve as potential predictors of omalizumab response. Notably, ASST positivity and comorbid allergic diseases were associated with an early response to treatment. These findings highlight the importance of considering individual patient characteristics when predicting the likelihood and timing of response to omalizumab in CSU.

Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria, Angioedema, and Atopic Dermatitis.

Reducing the burden of disease for patients and families requires being able to measure health status changes related to disease severity, control, and response to treatment over time. Patient-reported outcomes are patient perceptions of their health status. Such perceptions are critical to decision making. Some patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are extensive and often intended to be used only for detailed research assessments. Many PROMs, however, form critical components of valid, reliable, and responsive assessments in clinical research and routine clinical practice. The smallest score change in a PROM that would lead to different decision making by patients is called the minimally important difference. Using PROMs may also offer advantages over general questions or unvalidated tools. With the innovation of technology, the ability to chronicle disease symptoms using communication technology (mobile phone applications) has become increasingly available. Collection of real-world data in this capacity will be very useful for identifying more precise phenotypes/endotypes necessary for investigation of tailored therapies for chronic spontaneous and inducible urticaria, angioedema, and atopic dermatitis. Here, we provide an overview of PROMs that have been developed for the assessment of disease severity, control, and quality of life and that have been validated for the use of adults and children with these skin disorders.

Clinico-Epidemiologic Profile and Response to Levocetirizine in Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria: A Retrospective Cohort Study from a Tertiary Care Center in North India.

Background: Comprehensive long-term follow-up data regarding chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) among general populations, especially from the Indian subcontinent is scanty. Aim and Objectives: The aim of the study were to analyze the clinico-epidemiological profile, comorbidities of CSU patients, and factors affecting patient response to various doses of levocetirizine. Materials and Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, complete history regarding demographic profile, clinical examination, investigations, treatment given, and follow-up details of all CSU patients attending urticaria clinic between 2010 and 2019 were analyzed. These were considered variables to determine the factors playing a role in response to various doses of levocetirizine. Results: Totally, 1104 files of CSU were analyzed. The male-to-female ratio was 1:1.5 with a mean age of 33.03 ± 14.33 years. Thyroid dysfunction and atopy were seen in 142 (12.8%) and 184 (16.7%) patients, respectively. Vitamin D deficiency and high serum immunoglobulin E (IgE) levels were seen in 461 (41.7%) and 340 (30.7%) patients, respectively. Immunosuppressives were required at some point in 196 (17.7%) patients. Patients with higher levels of serum IgE and D-dimer (P < 0.05) were found to require frequent updosing of levocetirizine, while age, sex, duration of illness, presence of angioedema, co-morbidities, identifiable precipitating factors, presence of diurnal variation, family history, and vitamin D deficiency were found to not have an effect on levocetirizine dosing. Conclusion: Ours is a large single-center study exemplifying the biomarkers including baseline serum IgE and D-dimer levels, which could identify a CSU patient who could warrant a higher dose of antihistamine/antihistamine refractory urticaria.