Co-Occurring Driver Genomic Alterations in Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC): A Retrospective Analysis.

Background: Actionable driver mutations account for 40-50% of NSCLC cases, and their identification clearly affects treatment choices and outcomes. Conversely, non-actionable mutations are genetic alterations that do not currently have established treatment implications. Among co-occurring alterations, the identification of concurrent actionable genomic alterations is a rare event, potentially impacting prognosis and treatment outcomes. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated the prevalence and patterns of concurrent driver genomic alterations in a large series of NSCLCs to investigate their association with clinicopathological characteristics, to assess the prognosis of patients whose tumor harbors concurrent alterations in the genes of interest and to explore their potential therapeutic implications. Results: Co-occurring driver alterations were identified in 26 out of 1520 patients with at least one gene alteration (1.7%). Within these cases, the incidence of concurrent actionable gene alterations was 39% (0.7% of the overall cohort). Among compound actionable gene mutations, EGFR was the most frequently involved gene (70%). The most frequent association was EGFR mutations with ROS1 rearrangement. Front-line targeted treatments were the preferred approach in patients with compound actionable mutations, with dismal median PFS observed (6 months). Conclusions: Advances in genomic profiling technologies are facilitating the identification of concurrent mutations. In patients with concurrent actionable gene alterations, integrated molecular and clinical data should be used to guide treatment decisions, always considering rebiopsy at the moment of disease progression.

Unusual Synchronous Multiple Primary Early-Stage Lung Adenocarcinoma with Concomitant MET Exon 14 Skipping, PIK3CA and KRAS Mutations: A Case Report.

Instruction: Synchronous multiple primary lung cancer (sMPLC) constitutes a distinct subtype of NSCLC, where accurate diagnosis and prognostic evaluation remain challenging. Case Presentation: The case involves a 70-year-old male patient admitted to the hospital due to bilateral pulmonary nodules. The patient underwent staged resection. Molecular pathological examination revealed that tumor A harbored concurrent mutations in MET exon 14 skipping and PIK3CA (p.E545K), while tumor B exhibited a KRAS exon 2 (p.G12S/D) mutation. Postoperatively, the patient demonstrated a favorable recovery, with no evidence of recurrence for 1 year. Conclusion: This study presents a case of sMPLC in early-stage lung cancer, illustrating the genetic heterogeneity in early-stage lung adenocarcinoma and underscoring the significance of precise evaluation of sMPLC and intrapulmonary metastases.

PBRM1 and KDM5C cooperate to define high-angiogenesis tumors and increased antiangiogenic response in renal cancer.

Vascular endothelial growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (VEGFR-TKIs) are key antiangiogenic drugs for renal cancer treatment. While Von Hippel-Lindau dysfunction constitutes the base for VEGFR-TKIs sensitivity, the role for individual and concurrent mutations in the genes encoding for the chromatin remodelers Polybromo-1 (PBRM1) and Lysine Demethylase 5C (KDM5C) is poorly understood. Here, we analyzed the tumor mutational and expression profiles of 155 unselected clear cell RCC (ccRCC) cases treated with first-line VEGFR-TKIs and the ccRCC cases of IMmotion151 trial were used for validation. We found that concurrent PBRM1 and KDM5C (PBRM1&KDM5C) mutations occurred in 4-9% of cases and were enriched in Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center favorable-risk patients. In our cohort, tumors only mutated in PBRM1 or concurrently mutated in PBRM1 and KDM5C had increased angiogenesis (P=0.0068 and 0.039; respectively), and tumors only mutated in KDM5C showed a similar trend. Best response to VEGFR-TKIs corresponded to PBRM1&KDM5C mutated cases, followed by those mutated only in KDM5C or only in PBRM1 (P=0.050, 0.040 and 0.027 versus non-mutated cases, respectively), with a trend for longer progression free survival (PFS) in the group with only PBRM1 mutated (HR=0.64; P=0.059). Validation in the IMmotion151 trial revealed a similar correlation with increased angiogenesis and the PFS of patients in the VEGFR-TKI-arm was the longest in PBRM1&KDM5C mutated cases, intermediate for only PBRM1 or only KDM5C mutated patients and the shortest in non-mutated cases (P=0.009 and 0.025, for PBRM1&KDM5C and PBRM1 versus non-mutated cases). In conclusion, somatic PBRM1 and KDM5C mutations are common in patients with metastatic ccRCC and likely cooperate increasing tumor angiogenesis and VEGFR-TKI-based antiangiogenic therapy benefit.

Novel PTCH1 and concurrent TP53 mutations in four patients with numerous non-syndromic basal cell carcinomas: The paradigm of oncogenic synergy.

There has been a significant increase in basal cell carcinoma (BCC) incidence, the most common cancer in humans and the age of presentation with the first diagnosis of BCC has decreased in past decades. In this study, we investigated the possibility of genetic markers that can lead to earlier and closer observation of patients at high risk for development of multiple BCCs. The overall goal is to decrease the morbidity and the economic burden of diagnosis and treatment of recurring and/or advanced BCCs. Four patients with numerous BCCs, some of them exceptionally large, were included in this study. A sample of representative BCCs, normal non-sun-exposed skin and blood samples were obtained from each patient. Whole-exome sequencing of DNA was conducted on all samples, and a series of bioinformatics filtering was performed to identify potentially pathogenic sequence variants. The analysis of the data resulted in detection of oncogenic mutations in PTCH1, two of which being novel, and concurrent mutations in TP53 in BCC tumours of all four patients. Such mutations may explain the numerous and postexcision recurring nature of the BCCs of exceptionally large size observed in all these patients, and they can be suggested to serve as a genetic marker for high-risk patients for early detection, prognostication and close follow-up.

Concurrent mutations associated with trastuzumab-resistance revealed by single cell sequencing.

PURPOSE: HER2-positive breast cancer patients benefit from HER2-targeted therapies, among which the most commonly used is trastuzumab. However, acquired resistance typically happens within one year. The cellular heterogeneity of it is less clear. METHODS: Here we generated trastuzumab-resistant cells in two HER2-positive breast cancer cell lines, SK-BR-3 and BT-474. Cells at different time points during the resistance induction were examined by exome sequencing to study changes of genomic alterations over time. Single cell-targeted sequencing was also used to identify resistance-associated concurrent mutations. RESULTS: We found a rapid increase of copy number variation (CNV) regions and gradual accumulation of single nucleotide variations (SNVs). On the pathway level, non-synonymous SNVs for SK-BR-3 cells were enriched in the MAPK signaling pathway, while for BT-474 cells they were enriched in mTOR and PI3K-Akt signaling pathways. However, all of the three signaling pathways were in the downstream of the HER2 kinase. Putative trastuzumab-resistance-associated SNVs included AIFM1 P548L and ERBB2 M833R in SK-BR-3 cells, and ADAMTS19 V451L, OR5M9 D230N, COL9A1 R627T, and ITGA7 H911Q in BT-474 cells. Single-cell-targeted sequencing identified several concurrent mutations. By validation, we found that concurrent mutations (AIFM1 P548L and IL1RAPL2 S546C in SK-BR-3 cells, MFSD11 L242I and ANAPC4 E16K in BT-474 cells) led to a decrease of trastuzumab sensitivity. CONCLUSION: Taken together, our study revealed a common pathway level trastuzumab-resistance mechanism for HER2-positive breast cancer cells. In addition, our identification of concurrent SNVs associated with trastuzumab-resistance may be indicative of potential targets for the treatment of trastuzumab-resistant breast cancer patients.

Influence of Concurrent Mutations on Overall Survival in EGFR-mutated Non-small Cell Lung Cancer.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with activating somatic mutations in the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) have better outcomes with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) than with chemotherapy. However, even with the most effective therapies, not all patients respond. The presence of concurrent pathogenic mutations could play a role in resistance. The objective of this study was to analyze the impact of concurrent mutations in genes other than EGFR on survival outcomes of patients treated with TKIs for EGFR-mutated NSCLC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort analysis of patients with advanced NSCLC treated with TKIs in our center between January 2016 and December 2019. Clinical and pathological characteristics, EGFR mutational status, presence of co-occurring genetic alterations, overall (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were evaluated. RESULTS: Of the 42 patients with advanced NSCLC harboring EGFR mutations who received TKIs in our center, 22 (52%) had no concurrent mutations, 15 (36%) had a non-pathogenic, non-resistance co-mutation, and 5 (12%) had a concurrent resistance mutation. The median OS of the global population was 14.9 months, with a shorter OS in the group harboring a concurrent resistance mutation (7.7 vs. 18.1 months, p=0.002). Concurrent mutations possibly associated with resistance were found in PIK3CA, KRAS and PTEN genes. CONCLUSION: Concurrent resistance mutations in genes other than EGFR influenced the outcome of patients with NSCLC, while non-resistance mutations did not alter survival, compared to the absence of co-mutations. This evidence highlights the importance of a careful interpretation of molecular findings. The best treatment options for these patients should be studied in randomized controlled trials.

The lonely driver or the orchestra of mutations? How next generation sequencing datasets contradict the concept of single driver checkpoint mutations in solid tumours - NSCLC as a scholarly example.

Driver mutations are considered to be responsible for the majority of cancers and several of those mutations provide targets in order to set up personalized therapies. So far the generally accepted opinion had been that driver mutations occur as stand-alone factors, but novel sequencing technologies induced an essential rethink. Next generation sequencing approaches have shown that double, triple or multiple concurrent mutations could occur within the same tumour and may by interaction influence sensitivity to anticancer drugs and therapy success. This review focusses on this novel concept and discusses the challenges for molecular pathology and laboratory diagnostics while providing putative solutions to overcome the present pitfalls, thereby taking NSCLC as an example.

ROS1 Fusions Rarely Overlap with Other Oncogenic Drivers in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Chromosomal rearrangements involving the gene ROS1 define a distinct molecular subset of NSCLCs with sensitivity to ROS1 inhibitors. Recent reports have suggested a significant overlap between ROS1 fusions and other oncogenic driver alterations, including mutations in EGFR and KRAS. METHODS: We identified patients at our institution with ROS1-rearranged NSCLC who had undergone testing for genetic alterations in additional oncogenes, including EGFR, KRAS, and anaplastic lymphoma receptor tyrosine kinase gene (ALK). Clinicopathologic features and genetic testing results were reviewed. We also examined a separate database of ROS1-rearranged NSCLCs identified through the commercial FoundationOne assay (Foundation Medicine, Cambridge, MA). RESULTS: Among 62 patients with ROS1-rearranged NSCLC evaluated at our institution, none harbored concurrent ALK fusions (0%) or EGFR activating mutations (0%). KRAS mutations were detected in two cases (3.2%), one of which harbored a concurrent noncanonical KRAS I24N mutation of unknown biological significance. In a separate ROS1 fluorescence in situ hybridization-positive case, targeted sequencing failed to confirm a ROS1 fusion but instead identified a KRAS G13D mutation. No concurrent mutations in B-Raf proto-oncogene, serine/threonine kinase gene (BRAF), erb-b2 receptor tyrosine kinase 2 gene (ERBB2), phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate 3-kinase catalytic subunit alpha gene (PIK3CA), AKT/serine threonine kinase 1 gene (AKT1), or mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase 1 gene (MAP2K1) were detected. Analysis of an independent data set of 166 ROS1-rearranged NSCLCs identified by FoundationOne demonstrated rare cases with co-occurring driver mutations in EGFR (one of 166) and KRAS (three of 166) and no cases with co-occurring ROS1 and ALK rearrangements. CONCLUSIONS: ROS1 rearrangements rarely overlap with alterations in EGFR, KRAS, ALK, or other targetable oncogenes in NSCLC.