Lung SBRT: Dose gradient optimization based on target size.

This study investigated optimization settings that steepen the dose gradient as a function of target size for lung stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). Sixty-eight lung SBRT patients with planning target volumes (PTVs) ranging from 2-203 cc were categorized into small (<20 cc), medium (20-50 cc), and large (>50 cc) groups. VMAT plans were generated using the normal tissue objective (NTO) to penalize the dose gradient at progressively steeper NTO fall-off values (0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4, 0.5 mm-1). Dose was calculated using the AcurosXB algorithm and was normalized so the prescription dose covered 95% of the PTV. Mann-Whitney, Kruskal-Wallis and ANOVA tests were used to assess for statistical differences in the Conformity Index at the 50% isodose level (CI50%), global maximum dose (Dmax), and monitor units (MU) across the various NTO settings. All plans adhered to institutional criteria and met the guidelines of the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 0813. Steeper NTO fall-off values significantly increased Dmax and MUs across all groups (p < 0.05). CI50% significantly differed with fall-off values in small (0.3 mm-1) and medium (0.2 mm-1) targets, indicating steeper NTO fall-off values improve CI50% for small and medium targets (p < 0.05). Large targets showed no significant CI50% difference across these fall-off values. As target size increases, the importance of fall-off values in achieving an acceptable CI50% diminishes. Smaller targets benefit from steeper fall-off values despite increased Dmax and MUs. Consideration of fall-off value relative to target size is crucial to limit dose spillage outside the target.

A dosimetric evaluation of intensity modulated radiotherapy and three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy for prostate cancer in Ghana.

External beam radiotherapy incorporates treatment techniques such as three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT), intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), image-guided radiotherapy and volumetric modulated arc therapy to deliver high-energy radiation to cancer. The use of IMRT for cancer treatment is also associated with significant costs for patients in low-middle-income countries. The purpose of this study was to compare the dosimetric properties of 3DCRT and IMRT treatment plans for the external beam irradiation of patients with prostate cancer (Pca) to ascertain the superiority of IMRT in terms of dose homogeneity, conformity and dose limitation to organs at risk (OAR) in a resource-limited setting. One hundred and sixty treatment plans for 80 patients were created using 3DCRT and IMRT on the Eclipse treatment planning system (version 13.6). Data were collected and assessed from the dose-volume histogram of each plan. The conformity and homogeneity index (HI) for each of the plans were calculated. The doses to the OAR were also recorded and evaluated. The mean HIs for the IMRT and 3DCRT treatment techniques were 0.04 ± 0.02 (range: 0.01-0.011) and 0.09 ± 0.02 (range: 0.04-0.016), respectively. The mean conformity index (CI) for IMRT and 3DCRT techniques were 1.257 ± 0.112 (range: 0.99-1.58) and 1.302 ± 0.196 (range: 1.10-2.26). IMRT had a better significant mean HI and CI compared to 3DCRT. Generally, for this study, IMRT had better organ sparing compared to 3DCRT. The mean doses for the OARs ranged from 4.3-74.6 Gy for IMRT and 3.1-75.9 Gy for the 3DCRT technique. Overall, this study demonstrates that IMRT may offer an enhanced therapeutic profile, potentially reducing toxicity to the patient and ensuring more precise dose delivery to the target volume compared to 3DCRT in PCa external beam irradiation.

Evaluation of Dynamic Multi-Leaf Collimator (MLC) versus Fixed MLC for Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy (IMRT) Using the Agility 160-Leaf Collimator.

AIM: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of static or step-and-shoot intensity-modulated radiotherapy (ssIMRT) and dynamic intensity-modulated radiotherapy (dIMRT) delivery techniques for various treatment sites. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The treatment planning system (TPS) was utilized to develop optimal treatment plans for twenty-seven patients selected for this comparative study, including nine with head and neck cancer, nine with prostate cancer, and nine with cervical cancer. The prescribed doses were 7000cGy/33fr, 7425cGy/33fr, and 5000cGy/25fr for the nasopharynx, prostate, and cervix cases, respectively, in both ssIMRT and dIMRT delivery techniques. Plans were generated using the Monaco treatment planning system with a 6MV photon beam and nine equidistant fields. Plan evaluation criteria included dose-volume histogram analysis, dose homogeneity index, conformity index, radiation delivery time, and monitor unit requirements. RESULTS: All plans were optimized to ensure that 98% of the planning target volume (PTV) received at least 95% of the prescribed dose, while meeting the planning objectives for organs at risk. dIMRT plans exhibited superior conformity (CI = 0.85 ± 0.05) compared to ssIMRT plans (CI = 0.79 ± 0.08), with statistically significant differences (P < 0.01). Inhomogeneity within the PTV was significantly higher in ssIMRT plans (HI = 0.10 ± 0.02) compared to dIMRT plans (HI = 0.09 ± 0.01), with a significant difference (P < 0.01). Delivery time per fraction was significantly lower in dIMRT compared to ssIMRT (P < 0.01). Furthermore, dIMRT plans required a higher mean monitor unit value (1335.4 ± 172.2) compared to ssIMRT plans (974.4 ± 133.6) with a significant difference (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The findings of this study indicate that dIMRT provides improved target coverage, homogeneity, and conformity while reducing treatment delivery time compared to ssIMRT.

Dose conformity and falloff in single-lesion intracranial SRS with DCA and VMAT methods.

BACKGROUND: Intracranial stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) aims at achieving highly conformal dose distribution and, at the same time, attaining rapid dose falloff outside the treatment target. SRS is performed using different techniques including dynamic conformal arcs (DCA) and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT). PURPOSE: In this study, we compare dose conformity and falloff in DCA and VMAT plans for SRS with a single target. METHODS: To compare dose conformity in SRS plans, we employ a novel conformity index C I d e x p $C{I}_{{d}_{exp}}$ , RTOG conformity index ( C I R T O G $C{I}_{RTOG}$ ), and Riet-Paddick conformity index ( C I R P $C{I}_{RP}$ ). In addition, we use indices R 50 % $R50\% $ , V 10 G y ${V}_{10Gy}$ , and V 12 G y ${V}_{12Gy}$ to evaluate dose falloff. For each of the considered 118 cases of SRS, two plans were created using DCA and VMAT. A two-tailed Student's t-test was used to evaluate the difference between the employed indices for the DCA and VMAT plans. RESULTS: The studied VMAT plans were characterized by higher dose conformity than the DCA plans. The differences between the conformity indices for the DCA plans and VMAT plans were statistically significant. The DCA plans had a smaller number of monitor units (MUs) and smaller indices R50%, V10 Gy, and V12 Gy than the VMAT plans. However, the differences between R50%, V10 Gy, and V12 Gy for the DCA and VMAT plans were not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: Although the studied VMAT plans had higher dose conformity, they also had larger MUs than the DCA plans. In terms of dose falloff characterized by parameters R50%, V10 Gy, and V12 Gy, DCA serves as a reasonable alternative to VMAT in the case of a single brain metastasis.

Use of Zernike moments to characterize dose conformity for radiotherapy treatment plans.

Dose conformity is an essential parameter used in radiotherapy and radiosurgery that measures the correspondence of the dose distribution derived from a Treatment Planning System (TPS) with the actual volume to be treated, the Planning Treatment Volume (PTV). The present work uses a method based on the expansion of dose distributions and PTVs by three-dimensional Zernike polynomials and further comparison of their moments to define a general criterion of dose conformity. To carry on this study, data coming from 20 patients comprising 80 datasets exported from the TPS, which included imaging data (PTVs) and dose distributions corresponding to different treatment modalities: three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy, intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT), were used. The expansions in Zernike polynomials were obtained up to order 6 and reconstructed dose distributions and PTVs were obtained and compared, and several definitions for a general dose conformity index were proposed. Results indicate agreement between the proposed dose conformity index and the Conformation Number CN. The proposed method allows for a systematic approach to the analysis of dose distributions with further extensions in AI applications.

Toward an improved assessment of dose conformity in radiotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Evaluation of dose conformity is important to ensure minimum dose to normal tissue and sufficient dose coverage of the planning target volume (PTV). The existing conformity indices depend on the PTV volume and do not differentiate between two different scenarios: overdosing normal tissue and underdosing PTV. PURPOSE: In this study, we introduce a novel index to assess conformity of dose distributions in radiotherapy. METHODS: The suggested conformity index C I d e x p $C{I_{{d_{exp}}}}$ is defined by the ratio of the volume representing actual "non-conformity" of the planned dose and the volume representing acceptable "non-conformity." The latter volume is produced by expanding the PTV. If both the average distance ( d ¯ $\overline d $ ) between the reference isodose surface and planning target volume and arbitrarily selected PTV expansion margin ( d e x p ${d_{exp}}$ ) are much smaller than the size of the PTV, C I d e x p $C{I_{{d_{exp}}}}$ approximately equals the ratio d ¯ d e x p $\dfrac{{\bar d}}{{{d_{exp}}}}$ . In this work, C I d e x p $C{I_{{d_{exp}}}}$ was utilized to analyze 90 cases of brain metastases treated with stereotactic radiation therapy (SRS) and 102 cases of lung cancer treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). RESULTS: For d e x p ${d_{exp}}$  = 0.1 cm, all considered SRS treatment plans were characterized by C I d e x p < 1 $C{I_{{d_{exp}}}} < 1$ while 2 out of 102 SBRT plans had C I d e x p > 1 $C{I_{{d_{exp}}}} > 1$ . The average values of C I d e x p $C{I_{{d_{exp}}}}$ for SRS and SBRT plans were 0.31 and 0.43, respectively. For d e x p ${d_{exp}}$  = 0.2 cm, all studied treatment plans had C I d e x p < 1 $C{I_{{d_{exp}}}} < 1$ , and the average values of C I d e x p $C{I_{{d_{exp}}}}$ for SRS and SBRT plans were 0.15 and 0.25, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The suggested conformity index C I d e x p $C{I_{{d_{exp}}}}$ varies less with PTV volume than the RTOG and Riet-Paddick indices frequently used for evaluation of dose conformity. In addition, C I d e x p $C{I_{{d_{exp}}}}$ can be expressed as a sum of two terms which describe "over-coverage" and "under-coverage" of the treatment target. The results confirm that C I d e x p $C{I_{{d_{exp}}}}$ can be used for evaluation of dose conformity in SRS and SBRT.

Analysis of CyberKnife intracranial treatment plans using ICRU 91 dose reporting: A retrospective study.

ICRU 91, published in 2017, is an international standard for prescribing, recording, and reporting stereotactic treatments. Since its release, there has been limited research published on the implementation and impact of ICRU 91 on clinical practice. This work provides an assessment of the recommended ICRU 91 dose reporting metrics for their use in clinical treatment planning. A set of 180 intracranial stereotactic treatment plans for patients treated by the CyberKnife (CK) system were analyzed retrospectively using the ICRU 91 reporting metrics. The 180 plans comprised 60 trigeminal neuralgia (TGN), 60 meningioma (MEN), and 60 acoustic neuroma (AN) cases. The reporting metrics included the planning target volume (PTV) near-minimum dose ( D near - min ${D}_{{\rm{near}} - {\rm{min}}}$ ), near-maximum dose ( D near - max ${D}_{{\rm{near}} - {\rm{max}}}$ ), and median dose ( D 50 % ${D}_{50{\rm{\% }}}$ ), as well as the gradient index (GI) and conformity index (CI). The metrics were assessed for statistical correlation with several treatment plan parameters. In the TGN plan group, owing to the small targets, D near - min ${D}_{{\rm{near}} - {\rm{min}}}$ was greater than D near - max ${D}_{{\rm{near}} - {\rm{max}}}$ in 42 plans, whereas both metrics were not applicable in 17 plans. The D 50 % ${D}_{50{\rm{\% }}}$ metric was predominantly influenced by the prescription isodose line (PIDL). The GI was significantly dependent on target volume in all analyses performed, where the variables were inversely related. The CI was only dependent on target volume in treatment plans for small targets. The ICRU 91 D near - min ${D}_{{\rm{near}} - {\rm{min}}}$ and D near - max ${D}_{{\rm{near}} - {\rm{max}}}$ metrics breakdown in plans for small target volumes below 1 cm3 ; the Min and Max pixel should be reported in such cases. The D 50 % ${D}_{50{\rm{\% }}}$ metric is of limited use for treatment planning. Given their volume dependence, the GI and CI metrics could potentially serve as plan evaluation tools in the planning of the sites analyzed in this study, which would ultimately improve treatment plan quality.

Dosimetric evaluation of adult and paediatric brain tumours planned using mask-based cobalt-60 fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy compared to linear accelerator-based volumetric modulated arc therapy.

INTRODUCTION: We conducted a study to evaluate the dosimetric feasibility of mask-based cobalt-60 fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (mcfSRT) with the Leksell Gamma Knife® Icon™ device. METHODS: Eleven patients with intracranial tumours were selected for this dosimetry study. These patients, previously treated with volumetric arc therapy (VMAT), were re-planned using mcfSRT. Target volume coverage, conformity/gradient indices, doses to organs at risk and treatment times were compared between the mcfSRT and VMAT plans. Two-sided paired Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to compare differences between the two plans. RESULTS: The V95 for PTV was similar between fractionated mcfSRT and VMAT (P = 0.47). The conformity index and gradient indices were 0.9 and 3.3, respectively, for mcfSRT compared to 0.7 and 4.2, respectively, for VMAT (P < 0.001 and 0.004, respectively). The radiation exposure to normal brain was lower for mcfSRT across V10, V25 and V50 compared with VMAT (P = 0.007, <0.001 and <0.001, respectively). The median D0.1cc for optic nerve and chiasm as well as the median D50 to the hippocampi were lower for mcfSRT compared to VMAT. Median beam-on time for mcfSRT was 9.7 min per fraction, compared to 0.9 min for VMAT (P = 0.002). CONCLUSION: mcfSRT plans achieve equivalent target volume coverage, improved conformity and gradient indices, and reduced radiation doses to organs at risk as compared with VMAT plans. These results suggest superior dosimetric parameters for mcfSRT plans and can form the basis for future prospective studies.

Novel approach for the evaluation of dose conformity in radiotherapy.

PURPOSE: We describe a new approach to evaluate conformity of dose distributions in radiotherapy. METHODS: The suggested conformity factor λ is defined by using existing conformity indices and expansion of the planning target volume (PTV). If the average distance ( d ¯ $\bar d$ ) between the PTV and reference isodose surface and an arbitrarily selected PTV expansion margin ( d e x p ${d_{exp}}$ ) are both much smaller than the size of the PTV, then λ approximately equals the ratio d ¯ d e x p $\frac{{\bar d}}{{{d_{exp}}}}$ . We use λ to analyze several cases of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). RESULTS: In the case of SRS with a single target or multiple targets, treatment plans produced with the help of volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) have smaller λ than plans produced by using dynamic conformal arcs (DCA). Likewise, it is demonstrated that in the case of SBRT, λ is reduced by employing VMAT instead of DCA. It is also shown that if the distance between the reference isodose surface and surface of the PTV is fixed, λ varies less with variations in PTV volume compared to frequently used conformity indices. CONCLUSIONS: The described conformity factor λ can be applied clinically to compare and rank treatment plans for lesions of different sizes. It is suggested that conditions λ < 1 $\lambda < 1$ and λ > 1 can be employed as "pass" and "fail" criteria, respectively, for dose conformity assessment with appropriate choice of d e x p ${d_{exp}}$ .

Significance of Dosimetric Parameters in Patients Undergoing Gamma Knife Radiosurgery for Vestibular Schwannoma.

Vestibular schwannoma (VS) is a benign, encapsulated, and slow-growing tumor of the myelin-forming cells of the 8th cranial nerve. Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS) has become a widely accepted primary treatment modality for small- to medium-sized VSs. In the case of VS, highly conformal, precisely focused radiation is delivered to the acoustic tumor in a single session under the direct supervision of a radiosurgery team. Aim: This study aims to determine the significance of Conformity Index and Gradient Index (GI) in patients undergoing GKRS for VS, retrospectively, and re-assess the plans. Materials and Methods: A dosimetric study of 112 patients of VS (both operated and nonoperated) treated on Gamma Knife Perfexion unit at our hospital, over a 3-year period, was carried out retrospectively. The patients' mean age at the time of GKRS was 48 years and the mean dose to the tumor margin was 13 Gy. The conformality of the treatment plan was determined by Conformity Index. GI determines fall off dose outside the target. Results: The dosimetric parameters such as Conformity Index and GI were calculated using the dose-volume histograms and the volume analysis tools available in the Leksell Gamma Plan using TMR 10 algorithm. The mean Paddick Conformity Index was found to be around 0.80 ± 0.085 and the mean GI was 2.67 ± 0.22. Conclusions: The dosimetric parameters can be used to evaluate the dose coverage and conformity and dose fall off outside the target.

The impact of tumor metabolic activity assessed by 18F-FET amino acid PET imaging in particle radiotherapy of high-grade glioma patients.

Background: Selective uptake of (18)F-fluoro-ethyl-tyrosine (18F-FET) is used in high-grade glioma (HGG) to assess tumor metabolic activity via positron emission tomography (PET). We aim to investigate its value for target volume definition, as a prognosticator, and associations with whole-blood transcriptome liquid biopsy (WBT lbx) for which we recently reported feasibility to mirror tumor characteristics and response to particle irradiation in recurrent HGG (rHGG). Methods: 18F-FET-PET data from n = 43 patients with primary glioblastoma (pGBM) and n = 33 patients with rHGG were assessed. pGBM patients were irradiated with photons and sequential proton/carbon boost, and rHGG patients were treated with carbon re-irradiation (CIR). WBT (Illumina HumanHT-12 Expression BeadChips) lbx was available for n = 9 patients from the rHGG cohort. PET isocontours (40%-70% SUVmax, 10% steps) and MRI-based treatment volumes (MRIvol) were compared using the conformity index (CI) (pGBM, n = 16; rHGG, n = 27). Associations with WBT lbx data were tested on gene expression level and inferred pathways activity scores (PROGENy) and from transcriptome estimated cell fractions (CIBERSORT, xCell). Results: In pGBM, median SUVmax was higher in PET acquired pre-radiotherapy (4.1, range (R) 1.5-7.8; n = 20) vs. during radiotherapy (3.3, R 1.5-5.7, n = 23; p = 0.03) and in non-resected (4.7, R 2.9-7.9; n = 11) vs. resected tumors (3.3, R 1.5-7.8, n = 32; p = 0.01). In rHGG, a trend toward higher SUVmax values in grade IV tumors was observed (p = 0.13). Median MRIvol was 32.34 (R 8.75-108.77) cm3 in pGBM (n = 16) and 20.77 (R 0.63-128.44) cm3 in rHGG patients (n = 27). The highest median CI was observed for 40% (pGBM, 0.31) and 50% (rHGG, 0.43, all tumors) isodose, with 70% (40%) isodose in grade III (IV) rHGG tumors (median CI, 0.38 and 0.49). High SUVmax was linked to shorter survival in pGBM (>3.3, p = 0.001, OR 6.0 [2.1-17.4]) and rHGG (>2.8, p = 0.02, OR 4.1 [1.2-13.9]). SUVmax showed associations with inferred monocyte fractions, hypoxia, and TGFbeta pathway activity and links to immune checkpoint gene expression from WBT lbx. Conclusion: The benefits of 18F-FET-PET imaging on gross tumor volume (GTV) definition for particle radiotherapy warrant further evaluation. SUVmax might assist in prognostic stratification of HGG patients for particle radiotherapy, highlights heterogeneity in rHGG, and is positively associated with unfavorable signatures in peripheral whole-blood transcriptomes.

Comparison between Three-Dimensional Conformal Radiation Therapy (3DCRT) and Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) for Radiotherapy of Cervical Carcinoma: A Heterogeneous Phantom Study.

Background: Radiotherapy plays a major role in the treatment of the cervical cancer. Objective: Dosimetric comparison of intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) with three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3DCRT) in cervical cancer treatment was performed by modifying the beams arrangements to achieve better organ at risk (OAR) sparing. Material and Methods: The analytical evaluation study was made by modifying the IMRT plan, subtracting the rectal volume from planning target volume (PTV), and applying the field-in-field technique in 3DCRT. Eight patients in various cervical cancer stages, from I‒III, were inducted for this investigation. The prescribed dose was 5000 cGy in 25 fractions. For all cases, both IMRT and 3DCRT plans were generated. For PTV and OARs, dose volume histogram (DVH) comparative analysis was carried out. For safety checks and quality control, pre-treatment verification of all the plans was performed using an indigenously developed pelvic phantom (for IMRT and 3DCRT) and gamma analysis with Delta4 phantom (for IMRT). Results: This study indicated that IMRT can treat cervical cancer more efficiently with less damage to OARs as compare to 3DCRT. Conclusion: In this study, we observe that the IMRT plans with subtracting rectal volume achieve better OAR sparing.

The novel universal conformity index and unconformity index algorithms for radiotherapy treatment plans.

The purpose of the study is that introduce novel universal Conformity Index (CI) and Unconformity Index (UCIs) Algorithms that can be used for all radiotherapy treatment planning methods. The applicability of existing CIs has been reviewed and analyzed for each radiotherapy plan dose distribution. Novel CI and UCIs have been derived in this study to complement the calculation deficiencies. The novel CI evaluation software has been developed using these algorithms with Eclipse Scripting Application Programing Interface (ESAPI). Also, this software has been tested at clinically case. There are deficiencies in existing CI formulas. Some of currently used CIs only consider the irradiated healthy tissue volume, whereas others solely consider the irradiated tumor volume. The existing CIs can't reveal the cause of unconformity and calculate the unconformity magnitude. In the current study, CI evaluation software were successfully run integrated with TPS. Novel CI and UCIs algorithms introduced in the current study overcome all calculation deficiencies of existing CIs. Results have showed that the novel CI yielding correct results when cold spots has occurred in the tumor volume (TV) and/or healthy tissues has been irradiated was completely compatible with the accepted definitions of the conformity index. Also, it is universally applicable. Besides, cause and magnitude of unconformity in plans can accurately be revealed with the novel UCI algorithms. Thus, what to be done to increase the conformity is well addressed. Novel CI and UCIs can effectively be used as optimization tool to create the best radiotherapy dose distribution.

Dosimetric and radiobiological comparison in head-and-neck radiotherapy using JO-IMRT and 3D-CRT.

Introduction: Dosimetric and radiobiological evaluations for the Jaws-only Intensity-modulated radiotherapy (JO-IMRT) technique for head and neck jaws-only intensity-modulated radiation therapy (JO-IMRT) and 3D conformal radiation therapy (3D-CRT). To compare the head-and-neck therapeutic approaches utilizing JO-IMRT and 3D-CRT techniques, different radiation dose indices were calculated, including: conformity index (CI), homogeneity index (HI), and radiobiological variables like Niemierko's equivalent uniform dose based tumor control probability (TCP) of planning target volume (PTV), normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) of organs at risk (OAR) (brainstem, spinal cord, and parotid grand). Materials and methods: Twenty-five nasopharynx patients were studied using the Prowess Panther Treatment Planning System (Prowess Inc). The results were compared with the dose distribution obtained using 3D-CRT. Results: Regarding tumor coverage and CI, JO-IMRT showed better results than 3D-CRT. The average doses received by the PTVs were quite similar: 72.1 ± 0.8 Gy by 3D-CRT and 72.5 ± 0.6 Gy by JO-IMRT plans (p > 0.05). The mean doses received by the parotid gland were 56.7 ± 0.7 Gy by 3D-CRT and 26.8 ± 0.3 Gy by JO-IMRT (p > 0.05). The HI and CI were 0.13 ± 0.01 and 0.14 ± 0.05 and (p > 0.05) by 3D-CRT and 0.83 ± 0.05 and 0.73 ± 0.10 by JO-IMRT (p < 0.05). The average TCP of PTV was 0.82 ± 0.08 by 3D-CRT and 0.92 ± 0.02 by JO-IMRT. Moreover, the NTCP of the parotid glands, brain stem, and spinal cord were lower using the JO-IMRT than 3D-CRT plans. In comparison to the 3D-CRT approach, the JO-IMRT technique was able to boost dose coverage to the PTV, improve the target's CI and HI, and spare the parotid glands. This suggests the power of the JO-IMRT over 3D-CRT in head-and-neck radiotherapy.

Plan Quality Assessment of Fractionated Stereotactic Radiotherapy Treatment Plans in Patients With Brain Metastases.

Background and Purpose: The treatment options available in the management of brain metastases includes fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (FSRT) and stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) treatments. FSRT treatments have proved to be useful mainly in the treatment of larger volumes. This study aims to evaluate the FSRT treatment technique used in our department based on various plan quality indices. Methods and Materials: 24 treatment plans of 23 patients were analyzed. Volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans were generated in line with the department protocol. The following parameters were extracted: Radiation Therapy Oncology Group conformity index (RTOG CI), Paddick conformity index (Paddick CI), gradient index (GI), quality index (Q), homogeneity index (HI), and V24.4 volume as a parallel index of V12 used at SRS plan evaluation. Results: Plan conformity was acceptable, RTOG CI mean was 0.942; Paddick CI mean was 0.824. The mean GI value was 6.146. The mean of HI and Q indices were 1.263 and 0.94, respectively. V24.4 mean was 33.434 cm3. All plans achieved clinically acceptable organs-at-risk (OAR) constraints. PTV volumes were clustered into either 10 cm3 or 15 cm3 bins depending on the plan quality metric we used. The mean values show a balanced distribution of plan indices along the various PTV bins. Discussion: Our results based on the derived indices show that our FSRT approach can achieve clinically acceptable treatment plans. Furthermore, the clustering of PTV volumes show that these plan quality metrics remain acceptable for a wide spectrum of PTV volumes.

A volume-independent conformity index for stereotactic radiosurgery.

PURPOSE: To develop a volume-independent conformity metric called the Gaussian Weighted Conformity Index (GWCI) to evaluate stereotactic radiosurgery/radiotherapy (SRS/SRT) plans for small brain tumors. METHODS: A signed bi-directional local distance (BLD) between the prescription isodose line and the target contour is determined for each point along the tumor contour (positive distance represents under-coverage). A similarity score function (SF) is derived from Gaussian function, penalizing under- and over-coverage at each point by assigning standard deviations of the Gaussian function. Each point along the dose line contour is scored with this SF. The average of the similarity scores determines the GWCI. A total of 40 targets from 18 patients who received Gamma-Knife SRS/SRT treatments were analyzed to determine appropriate penalty criteria. The resulting GWCIs for test cases already deemed clinically acceptable are presented and compared to the same cases scored with the New Conformity Index to determine the influence of tumor volumes on the two conformity indices (CIs). RESULTS: A total of four penalty combinations were tested based on the signed BLDs from the 40 targets. A GWCI of 0.9 is proposed as a cutoff for plan acceptability. The GWCI exhibits no target volume dependency as designed. CONCLUSION: A limitation of current CIs, volume dependency, becomes apparent when applied to SRS/SRT plans. The GWCI appears to be a more robust index, which penalizes over- and under-coverage of tumors and is not skewed by the tumor volume.

Dosimetric comparison among dynamic conformal arc therapy, coplanar and non-coplanar volumetric modulated arc therapy for single brain metastasis.

In the delivery of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) by linear accelerator (LINAC), dynamic conformal arc therapy (DCAT) with non-coplanar beams is conventionally used. However, volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) can improve target conformity, thereby decreasing the dose to organs at risk by inversed planning methods, but few studies have directly compared DCAT and VMAT with and without non-coplanar beams in patients with single brain metastasis. We therefore conducted a planning study to compare the dose distribution in DCAT, VMAT using only a coplanar arc (CoVMAT) and VMAT with non-coplanar arcs (NcVMAT) in the treatment of single brain metastasis. DCAT, CoVMAT and NcVMAT plans were created for 15 patients. The three modalities were compared in terms of target conformity, target coverage, the dose to normal brain tissue, monitor units (MUs) and beam-on time. Both conformity indices (RTOG-CI and IP-CI) as well as the D98% of the gross target volume (GTV) were significantly better in the NcVMAT plans than in the DCAT plans. Comparisons of the doses to normal brain tissue revealed that the V20Gy, V15Gy, V12Gy, V10Gy and V5Gy were significantly smaller in the NcVMAT plans than in the plans based on the other two modalities. The MUs of the DCAT and NcVMAT plans were larger than those of the CoVMAT plans, and the beam-on time was longer in the NcVMAT and CoVMAT plans than in the DCAT plans. Compared to the CoVMAT and DCAT plans, NcVMAT plans significantly improved target conformity and reduced the doses to normal brain tissue at V20Gy, V15Gy, V12Gy, V10Gy and V5Gy.

Dosimetric Comparison of Whole Breast Radiotherapy Using Field-in-Field and Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy Techniques in Left-Sided Breast Cancer Patients.

Introduction The radiotherapy of left-sided breast cancers is challenging because of neighboring critical organs, posing an increased risk of complications. Various radiation delivery techniques have been used to deliver the desired dose of radiation to the target area while keeping the doses to nearby structures within constraints. The main aim of this study is to quantify doses delivered to the organs at risk (OARs) including heart, left lung, spinal cord, and contralateral breast, and to the planning target volume (PTV) using Field-in-Field (FIF) and Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT). Patients and methods A retrospective review of 15 left-sided breast cancer patients was done. All the patients underwent breast-conserving surgery and adjuvant radiation. For every patient, two different radiation treatment plans were formulated and compared for the PTV coverage and doses to OARs, including heart, ipsilateral lung, spinal cord, and contralateral breast. The radiation treatment techniques utilized for this purpose were FIF and VMAT. The homogeneity index (HI), and conformity index (CI) required for the treatment planning were also calculated. Data was analyzed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (IBM Corp., Armonk, USA). An Independent T-test was used for statistical analysis. Results The mean age was 41 years and the majority of them were stage II. Total nine patients were given 4005centi Gray (cGy) in 15 fractions (fr) followed by 10Gy boost, hence receiving a total dose of 5005cGy in 20fr. While remaining six patients were given a total dose 4005cGy in 15fr without any boost. All patients were hypofractionated and the dose was delivered at a rate of 267cGy per fr. The FIF technique utilized in breast cancer radiation significantly reduced the mean doses to OARs: mean heart dose (3.81cGy), ipsilateral lung dose (V16- 15cGy), mean contralateral breast dose (0.03cGy), and maximum spinal cord dose (0.18cGy); as compared to VMAT technique which delivered comparatively higher doses: mean heart dose (8.85cGy), ipsilateral lung dose (V16- 19.82cGy), mean contralateral breast dose (4.59cGy), and maximum spinal cord dose (7.14cGy). There was a significant mean difference between doses of OARs and all p-values were statistically significant (p<0.005). Moreover, the FIF technique also improves the dose distribution of PTV in terms of dose homogeneity. However, the conformity index is more enhanced with VMAT as opposed to FIF. Conclusion The FIF technique is more advantageous than the VMAT planning technique because it provides better dose distribution in terms of PTV coverage and significantly lower doses to OARs in radiotherapy to left-sided breast cancer.

Radiotherapy plan evaluation indices: A dosimetrical suitability check.

PURPOSE: To classify the available plan evaluation indices and compare the dosimetric suitability of these indices. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Available published plan evaluation indices were categorized. Conformity index (CI) into two groups, one group contains those CI formulas which do not consider critical structure and other group contains those CI formulas which consider planning target volume (PTV) coverage, normal tissue and critical structure sparing simultaneously. Various homogeneity index (HI) formulas extracted from literature. Structure data sets of 25 patients were taken under consideration comprising of various sites. For each patient, two plans were created using Volumetric Arc Therapy technique. First type of plan (Plan-A) were generated considering all tissue objectives for targets and Organ at Risks (OARs) whereas second type of plan (Plan-B) were generated considering only targets tissue objectives and excluding OARs tissue objectives during plan optimization and dose calculation. Planning evaluation parameters were compared between Plan-A and Plan-B. RESULTS: CI calculated by various formulas in two different scenarios presented <2% variation. Any commonly used CI formula failed to differentiate the two different planning situations. On comparison between HI of two different scenario, it is observed that there are four formulas of HI which showed negligible variation but two formulae: S-index and HI (D) showed marginal variation. It is also observed that when OARs are removed from optimization dose homogeneity improved which is specifically pointed by sigma index formula. CONCLUSION: CI, which has assimilated the presence of OAR in their formulation, shows more reliability in plan evaluation. Sigma index was found to be more efficient formula while evaluating homogeneity of a treatment plan.

Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT): A modern radiotherapy technique - A single institutional experience.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate VMAT plans for conformity and homogeneity of radiation dose to the target in order to share our experience as a pioneering institute to use VMAT technology in Pakistan. METHODS: Since December 2014 to January 2018, 530 patients of various anatomical sites were treated by VMAT technique at Neurospinal Cancer Care Institute (NCCI) Karachi Pakistan. ERGO++ planning system (Version 1.7.2) was used to develop VMAT plans with single or multiple arcs by the rotation of couch and gantry. The plans were evaluated by calculating Conformity Index (CI) and Homogeneity Index (HI) and critical organ (OARs) doses of individual tumor sites. RESULTS: The average CI of various sites was 1.4 (range: 1.0-2.0) and average HI of various sites was 1.20 (range: 1.07-1.374), respective critical organ doses were adequately achieved. CONCLUSIONS: VMAT treatment planning technique showed good conformal and homogeneous target coverage with sparing of organs at risk and reduced treatment delivery time. With these features, safety of VMAT technique may allow its routine clinical use, though it is still under investigation in many areas.