Delay in Time to Adjuvant Chemotherapy and its Impact on Oncological Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Optimal Cytoreductive Surgery for Advanced Ovarian Cancer: Analysis of 1480 Cases From the Indian HIPEC Registry.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The impact of delay in initiation of adjuvant chemotherapy following optimal CRS in different settings of treatment for advanced ovarian cancer needs to be studied with special reference to CRS HIPEC. METHODS: The 1480 advanced EOC patients underwent optimal CRS, followed by adjuvant chemotheraphy, with or without intraperitoneal (IP) chemotherapy in Normothermic or Hyperthermic form. Interval between the day of surgery and start of adjuvant chemotherapy and its impact on outcome was analyzed. RESULTS: CRS, CRS with IP or HIPEC was done in 400, 480, and 600 patients respectively. Median interval of starting adjuvant chemotherapy was 32 days CRS group, 34 days CRS + IP group and 41 days CRS + HIPEC group. Delay in chemotherapy impacted on recurrence free survival (RFS) in CRS + IV group (36 vs. 17 months: p = 0.02) and some impact in CRS + IP group (38 vs. 28 months; P 0.78) and no impact on CRS + HIPEC group (35 vs. 32 months; p = 0.17). CONCLUSIONS: Delay in starting adjuvant chemotherapy adversely affects RFS in patients undergoing optimal CRS alone. However, the delay didn't have an impact in the CRS + HIPEC group. Well-designed clinical studies are required to evaluate the impact of single dose of HIPEC.

CD8 + T-cells restrict the development of peritoneal metastasis and support the efficacy of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC).

Multimodal therapy for peritoneal metastasis (PM) including cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) provides long-term survival in highly selected colorectal cancer patients. Mechanisms behind HIPEC are unknown and may include induction of adaptive immunity. We therefore analyzed human PM samples and explored the impact of HIPEC in experimental models. Human samples from colorectal primary tumors (n = 19) and PM lesions (n = 37) were examined for the presence of CD8 + T-cells and their association with disease free (DFS) and overall survival (OS). CD8 + T cell response after HIPEC was assessed using an in-vivo PM mouse model, tumor cell lines and patient-derived tumor organoids. Patients with high intraepithelial CD8 + T cell counts showed longer DFS and OS. In the mouse model, HIPEC controlled growth of PM and increased numbers of functional granzyme positive CD8 + T cells within tumors. Cell lines and human organoids that were treated with heated chemotherapies showed immunogenic changes, reflected by significantly higher levels of MHC-class I molecules and expression of Cancer Testis Antigens Cyclin A1 and SSX-4. Using in-vitro co-culture assays, we noticed that cancer cells treated with heated chemotherapy primed dendritic cells, which subsequently enhanced effector functions of CD8 + T cells. The presence of CD8 + T-cells within PM lesions is associated with prolonged survival of patients with PM. Data from PM mouse model and in-vitro assay show that heated chemotherapies induce immunogenic changes on cancer cells leading to induction of CD8 + T-cells mediated immunity, which seems to control growth of PM lesions in mice after HIPEC.

The rare occurrence of unifocal peritoneal mesothelioma: a case report, literature review, and future directions.

Background: Mesothelioma is a rare, aggressive disease originating from mesothelial cells and carries a poor prognosis. Mesothelioma may arise from the pleura, pericardium, or peritoneum. Peritoneal mesothelioma (PM) usually spreads in a diffuse manner; however, a localized unifocal form of PM may occur. Literature on unifocal mesothelioma remains scarce. Case Description: Herein, we highlight a case of localized epithelioid PM in an 81-year-old gentleman with the unique challenges faced during management. The pelvic mass was 7 cm, well-circumscribed, and hyper-vascular with fibrous attachments to the abdominal wall. The patient had a peritoneal cancer index (PCI) of 4 on initial diagnostic laparoscopy. Diagnosis was confirmed by histology. Resection of the mass with a partial omentectomy was performed. Months later, the patient developed recurrence detected on follow-up imaging in the peri-splenic region. The patient underwent cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and heated intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) for 60 minutes using mitomycin C and cisplatin followed by an uneventful recovery. Our case report is followed by a review of literature on disease pathophysiology, treatment options, and recently promising immunotherapy approaches. Conclusions: CRS and HIPEC remains the standard treatment regimen for patients with PM. Nonetheless, a more nuanced approach might be indicated in specific patients with localized unifocal PM. Disease distribution and burden may impact the decision on surgical management in selected patients.

Long-Term Outcomes following Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy for Peritoneal Carcinomatosis of Colorectal Origin.

BACKGROUND: Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) combined with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is a major treatment of colorectal peritoneal carcinomatosis (CPC). The aim was to determine the disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) of patients undergoing CRS-HIPEC for CPC and factors associated with long-term survival (LTS). METHODS: consecutive CPC patients who underwent CRS-HIPEC at a HIPEC center between 2007 and 2021 were included. Actual survival was calculated, and Cox proportional hazards models were used to identify factors associated with OS, DFS and LTS. RESULTS: there were 125 patients with CPC who underwent primary CRS-HIPEC, with mean age of 54.5 years. Median follow-up was 31 months. Average intraoperative PCI was 11, and complete cytoreduction (CC-0) was achieved in 96.8%. Median OS was 41.6 months (6-196). The 2-year and 5-year OS were 68% and 24.8%, respectively, and the 2-year DFS was 28.8%. Factors associated with worse OS included pre-HIPEC systemic therapy, synchronous extraperitoneal metastasis, and PCI ≥ 20 (p < 0.05). Progression prior to CRS-HIPEC was associated with worse DFS (p < 0.05). Lower PCI, fewer complications, lower recurrence and longer DFS were associated with LTS (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: CRS and HIPEC improve OS in CPC patients but they have high disease recurrence. Outcomes depend on preoperative therapy response, extraperitoneal metastasis, and peritoneal disease burden.

Peritoneal Carcinomatosis in Colorectal Cancer: Review and Update of Current Clinical Data.

The peritoneal metastasized colorectal cancer (pmCRC) represents a serious health problem worldwide with a special emphasis in the developed countries. Several guidelines recognize the role of multimodal therapy consisting of cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) in the treatment of pmCRC. New data suggests that some other factors, eg, tumor biology, immune profile, neoadjuvant chemotherapy may play a predictive role for the oncological outcome of these patients.

Prognostic value of specific KRAS mutations in patients with colorectal peritoneal metastases.

BACKGROUND: There is little evidence on KRAS mutational profiles in colorectal cancer (CRC) peritoneal metastases (PM). This study aims to determine the prevalence of specific KRAS mutations and their prognostic value in a homogeneous cohort of patients with isolated CRC PM treated with cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data were collected from 13 Italian centers, gathered in a collaborative group of the Italian Society of Surgical Oncology. KRAS mutation subtypes have been correlated with clinical and pathological characteristics and survival [overall survival (OS), local (peritoneal) disease-free survival (LDFS) and disease-free survival (DFS)]. RESULTS: KRAS mutations occurred in 172 patients (47.5%) out of the 362 analyzed. Two different prognostic groups of KRAS mutation subtypes were identified: KRASMUT1 (G12R, G13A, G13C, G13V, Q61H, K117N, A146V), median OS > 120 months and KRASMUT2 (G12A, G12C, G12D, G12S, G12V, G13D, A59E, A59V, A146T), OS: 31.2 months. KRASMUT2 mutations mainly occurred in the P-loop region (P < 0.001) with decreased guanosine triphosphate (GTP) hydrolysis activity (P < 0.001) and were more frequently related to size (P < 0.001) and polarity change (P < 0.001) of the substituted amino acid (AA). When KRASMUT1 and KRASMUT2 were combined with other known prognostic factors (peritoneal cancer index, completeness of cytoreduction score, grading, signet ring cell, N status) in multivariate analysis, KRASMUT1 showed a similar survival rate to KRASWT patients, whereas KRASMUT2 was independently associated with poorer prognosis (hazard ratios: OS 2.1, P < 0.001; DFS 1.9, P < 0.001; LDFS 2.5, P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with CRC PM, different KRAS mutation subgroups can be determined according to specific codon substitution, with some mutations (KRASMUT1) that could have a similar prognosis to wild-type patients. These findings should be further investigated in larger series.

Systemic Chemotherapy in Colorectal Peritoneal Metastases Treated with Cytoreductive Surgery: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: For patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) peritoneal metastases (PM) who are eligible for cytoreductive surgery (CRS), the indication and timing of systemic chemotherapy (SC) are still under debate. This study aims to analyze the role of pre, post or perioperative SC on the survival and surgical complications of patients treated with CRS-HIPEC. METHODS: After a systematic search in MEDLINE, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Scopus, Web of Science and Embase, a meta-analysis was performed to compare postoperative complications, disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) according to SC administration and timing. PROSPERO: CRD42023478977. RESULTS: Of 1203 studies screened, 15 were included in the meta-analysis (4523 patients). Post-operative SC was associated with increased overall survival (post-SC vs. no post-SC: HR 0.81, p = 0.00001, I2 = 0%; pre-SC vs. post-SC: HR 0.65, p = 0.01, I2 = 28%), whereas SC (pre or post) or pre-SC compared to surgery alone was not (SC vs. no SC: p = 0.29, I2 = 80%; pre-SC vs. no pre-SC: p = 0.59, I2 = 58%). Similar results were seen for DFS. SC was not associated with an increased complication rate (p = 0.47, I2 = 64%). CONCLUSIONS: Systemic chemotherapy administration in patients undergoing radical surgery for colorectal peritoneal metastases is associated with increased survival only in the adjuvant/post-operative setting. Considering the limitations of the included studies, further trials are needed to answer this unresolved question.