RESUMO
Over the past decades, several effective disease-modifying therapies have been approved for the treatment of multiple sclerosis (MS); however, achieving long-term disease remission remains challenging, particularly for patients with aggressive forms of MS. Intense immunosuppression followed by hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) has been increasingly explored as a treatment strategy for aggressive MS. To date, more than 1800 MS patients have undergone HSCT worldwide. In this chapter, we provide a brief overview of the HSCT procedure, with a special focus on the unique considerations for transplanting MS patients (such as fertility preservation, prior therapy washout, and posttransplant monitoring). We also discuss the main evidence of efficacy and safety of the procedure in this context, as well as present preliminary data on the impact of HSCT on cerebrospinal fluid findings, magnetic resonance imaging metrics, and novel serum biomarkers of neurodegeneration and demyelination. In addition, we provide recommendations for patient selection from international guidelines.
Assuntos
Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas , Esclerose Múltipla , Humanos , Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas/métodos , Esclerose Múltipla/terapiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Previous evidence suggests sex differences in the clinical course of relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS), but comprehensive early-stage prospective studies are lacking. We aim to quantify the impact of sex on clinical outcomes in early-stage RRMS. METHODS: Utilizing prospective cohort data, we assessed the impact of biological sex on time-to-relapse, disability progression (Expanded Disability Status Scale [EDSS]), extremity function (Nine-Hole Peg Test, Timed-25-food walk test), cognition (Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test, Symbol Digit Modalities Test), quality-of-life (Hamburg Quality of Life Questionnaire in Multiple Sclerosis, Short-Form-36), fatigue (Fatigue Severity Scale, Fatigue Scale for Motor and Cognitive functions), and depression (Beck Depression Inventory-II) in clinically isolated syndrome (CIS) or RRMS patients. Inclusion was within 12 months of symptom onset. Linear, negative binomial, mixed, and Cox models estimated male vs. female effects at the four-year follow-up including baseline-to-follow-up course. RESULTS: We included 149 patients (65.1 % female). Eighty-five completed four-year follow-up. No sex differences in time-to-relapse emerged (HR = 0.91;95 %CI = 0.53-1.58). Males had no increased risk of EDSS worsening (OR = 0.75;95 %CI = 0.21-2.35) compared to females. Similarly, minor/no sex differences emerged in other outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Four years after first manifestation, neither disease activity (disability progression and relapse rate) nor patient-reported outcomes showed sex-related disparities in this early-MS-cohort. GOV IDENTIFIER: NCT01371071.
Assuntos
Progressão da Doença , Esclerose Múltipla Recidivante-Remitente , Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Adulto , Esclerose Múltipla Recidivante-Remitente/fisiopatologia , Estudos Prospectivos , Fatores Sexuais , Qualidade de Vida , Seguimentos , Caracteres Sexuais , Depressão/etiologia , Depressão/fisiopatologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Doenças Desmielinizantes/fisiopatologia , Doenças Desmielinizantes/diagnóstico , Fadiga/etiologia , Fadiga/fisiopatologiaRESUMO
Treatment options for secondary progressive MS (SPMS) are limited, especially considering that the new drugs recently approved are licensed for actively relapsing patients. We aimed to compare the disability progression in a real-world cohort of SPMS patients treated with natalizumab (NTZ) or interferon beta-1b (IFNb-1b). This multicenter retrospective enrolled patients with a diagnosis of SPMS according to 2014 Lublin criteria, who received NTZ or IFNb-1b for at least 48 months between the 1st June 2012 and the 15th May 2018 âat 33 Italian MS centers contributing to the Italian MS Registry NTZ or IFNb-1b. Confirmed Expanded Disability Status Scale worsening (CEW) and progression independent of relapse (PIRA) were evaluated. In order to correct for non-randomization, a propensity score matching of the groups was performed. Out of 5206 MS patients identified at the time of data extraction, 421 SPMS patients treated with NTZ (224 [53.2%] females, mean age 45.3 â± â25.4 years) and 353 with IFNb-1b (133 [37.8%] females, mean age 48.5 â± â19.8 years) were enrolled. After applying the matching procedure, 102 patients were retained in the NTZ group and 98 in the IFNb-2b group. The proportion of patients who reached the 48-month 1-point CEW was significantly higher in IFNb-1b compared to NTZ group (58.2% versus 30.4%, p â= â0.01). The proportion of patients who developed PIRA at 48 months were significantly higher in IFNb-1b compared to NTZ (72.4% versus 40.2%, p â= â0.01). EDSS before treatment initiation and SPMS duration were risk factors for disability progression in terms of PIRA (HR 2.54, 25%CI 1.67-5.7; p â= â0.006 and HR 2.04, 25%CI 1.22-3.35; p â= â0.01, respectively). Patients treated with IFNb-1b were 1.64 times more to likely to develop PIRA (HR 1.64, 25%CI 1.04-4.87; p â= â0.001). Treatment with NTZ in SPMS patients showed more favorable disability outcomes compared to IFNb-1b with beneficial effects over 48 months.
RESUMO
Background: Evidence from network meta-analyses (NMAs) and real-world propensity score (PS) analyses suggest monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) offer a therapeutic advantage over currently available oral therapies and, therefore, warrant consideration as a distinct group of high-efficacy disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) for patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis (RMS). This is counter to the current perception of these therapies by some stakeholders, including payers. Objectives: A multifaceted indirect treatment comparison (ITC) approach was undertaken to clarify the relative efficacy of mAbs and oral therapies. Design: Two ITC methods that use individual patient data (IPD) to adjust for between-trial differences, PS analyses and simulated treatment comparisons (STCs), were used to compare the mAb ofatumumab versus the oral therapies cladribine, fingolimod, and ozanimod. Data sources and methods: As IPD were available for trials of ofatumumab and fingolimod, PS analyses were conducted. Given summary-level data were available for cladribine, fingolimod, and ozanimod trials, STCs were conducted between ofatumumab and each of these oral therapies. Three efficacy outcomes were compared: annualized relapse rate (ARR), 3-month confirmed disability progression (3mCDP), and 6-month CDP (6mCDP). Results: The PS analyses demonstrated ofatumumab was statistically superior to fingolimod for ARR and time to 3mCDP but not time to 6mCDP. In STCs, ofatumumab was statistically superior in reducing ARR and decreasing the proportion of patients with 3mCDP compared with cladribine, fingolimod, and ozanimod and in decreasing the proportion with 6mCP compared with fingolimod and ozanimod. These findings were largely consistent with recently published NMAs that identified mAb therapies as the most efficacious DMTs for RMS. Conclusion: Complementary ITC methods showed ofatumumab was superior to cladribine, fingolimod, and ozanimod in lowering relapse rates and delaying disability progression among patients with RMS. Our study supports the therapeutic superiority of mAbs over currently available oral DMTs for RMS and the delineation of mAbs as high-efficacy therapies.
RESUMO
Background: While obesity has been shown to elevate the risk of developing multiple sclerosis (MS), there is a lack of strong evidence regarding its role in the disability progression and status of MS patients. Methods: This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to provide comparative estimates of WC and BMI in patients with MS (PwMS) and to investigate potential associations between the waist circumference (WC) and body mass index (BMI) and demographic and specific MS characteristics. Adhering to PRISMA guidelines, a detailed search of the MEDLINE PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Scopus databases was conducted. Results: A total of 16 studies were included. The pooled mean WC and BMI among PwMS was estimated to be 87.27 cm (95%CI [84.07; 90.47]) and 25.73 (95%CI [25.15; 26.31]), respectively. Meta-regression models established a significant bidirectional relationship between WC and the Expanded Disability Scale (EDSS) (p < 0.001) but not between BMI and EDSS (p = 0.45). Sensitivity analyses showed no association between WC and age (p = 0.48) and a tendency between WC and disease duration (p = 0.08). Conclusions: Although WC measurements classify PwMS as normal weight, BMI measurements classify them as overweight. Therefore, WC should complement BMI evaluations in clinical practice. Additionally, our findings highlight the significant association between abdominal fat, as indicated by WC, and disease progression. Considering the heightened risk of cardiovascular comorbidity and mortality among PwMS, we recommend integrating both WC and BMI as standard anthropometric measurements in routine clinical examinations and targeted prevention strategies for PwMS.
RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: While magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is established in diagnosing and monitoring disease activity in multiple sclerosis (MS), its utility in predicting and monitoring disease progression is less clear. AREAS COVERED: The authors consider changing concepts in the phenotypic classification of MS, including progression independent of relapses; pathological processes underpinning progression; advances in MRI measures to assess them; how well MRI features explain and predict clinical outcomes, including models that assess disease effects on neural networks, and the potential role for machine learning. EXPERT OPINION: Relapsing-remitting and progressive MS have evolved from being viewed as mutually exclusive to having considerable overlap. Progression is likely the consequence of several pathological elements, each important in building more holistic prognostic models beyond conventional phenotypes. MRI is well placed to assess pathogenic processes underpinning progression, but we need to bridge the gap between MRI measures and clinical outcomes. Mapping pathological effects on specific neural networks may help and machine learning methods may be able to optimize predictive markers while identifying new, or previously overlooked, clinically relevant features. The ever-increasing ability to measure features on MRI raises the dilemma of what to measure and when, and the challenge of translating research methods into clinically useable tools.
Assuntos
Esclerose Múltipla Crônica Progressiva , Esclerose Múltipla Recidivante-Remitente , Esclerose Múltipla , Humanos , Esclerose Múltipla/diagnóstico por imagem , Esclerose Múltipla/patologia , Progressão da Doença , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética/métodos , Encéfalo/patologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The intervals between two courses of anti CD20 therapies in the COVID19 pandemic era provided the opportunity to individually delay therapy, known as extended interval dosing (EID). METHODS: We collect real-world data on patients with primary progressive MS (PPMS) treated with Ocrelizumab (OCR) during the COVID'19 pandemic. The observation period in which the standard interval dosing (SID) or EID occurred (always a maintenance cycle, 600 mg) was from January 2020 to June 2021. All patients had two infusions during the observation period. Our first aim was to compare confirmed disability progression (CDP) between SID and EID patients. RESULTS: From a total cohort of 410 patients treated with OCR, 96 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria. All patients received two infusions during the index window, 71 received only SID infusions whilst 25 received at least one EID infusion throughout the entire follow-up. During the entire available follow-up (median 10 months, IQR 7-11), CDP was recorded in 5 patients (3/71, 4.2% SID and 2/25, 8% EID, V-Cramer = 0.141, p-value = 0.167). EID regimen did not influence the risk of CDP during the investigated follow up. CONCLUSION: In our multicentre real-world cohort, the EID regimen in PPMS patients did not result in increased CDP during the available follow-up.
Assuntos
Esclerose Múltipla Crônica Progressiva , Esclerose Múltipla , Humanos , Esclerose Múltipla Crônica Progressiva/tratamento farmacológico , Esclerose Múltipla Crônica Progressiva/induzido quimicamente , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados/uso terapêutico , Itália , Fatores Imunológicos/uso terapêutico , Fatores Imunológicos/efeitos adversosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Multiple Sclerosis (MS) is a neuroinflammatory disorder which affects 2.8 million people world-wide. A growing body of evidence shows ethnic disparities in MS. This review aims to evaluate differences, based upon ethnic background, in the incidence, prevalence, disease course, and efficacy of disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) among people with MS (PwMS). METHOD: Ethnicities were classified as White, Black, Hispanic, Asian, and Middle Eastern and North African (MENA). A literature search was conducted using the PubMed search engine to identify articles on MS and ethnicity that were published in the English language between 01/01/2005 and 31/05/2022. RESULTS: 101 studies met all inclusion criteria. Although the incidence and prevalence of MS varied among ethnicities, findings were inconsistent and depended on the continent of the study. Ethnicity may have an impact on the disease course. PwMS from Black, Hispanic, and MENA, but not Asian ethnicities, appeared to accumulate physical disability at a faster rate than those from White ethnicity. Although there was a lack of studies evaluating the relative safety and efficacy of DMTs among various ethnicities, interferon-beta was found to be less efficacious in PwMS from Black ethnicity. CONCLUSIONS: Further studies, with more uniform definitions of ethnicity are required to comprehensively understand ethnic disparities in MS, in particular to identify underlying causes, to facilitate the delivery of personalised medical care and avoid inequity.
Assuntos
Disparidades nos Níveis de Saúde , Esclerose Múltipla , Humanos , Etnicidade , Esclerose Múltipla/epidemiologia , Esclerose Múltipla/terapia , Grupos RaciaisRESUMO
Multiple sclerosis (MS) is an autoimmune disease of the central nervous system (CNS) that affects nearly 2.8 million people each year. MS distinguishes three main types: relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS), secondary progressive MS (SPMS) and primary progressive MS (PPMS). RRMS is the most common type, with the majority of patients eventually progressing to SPMS, in which neurological development is constant, whereas PPMS is characterized by a progressive course from disease onset. New or additional insights into the role of effector and regulatory cells of the immune and CNS systems, Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infection, and the microbiome in the pathophysiology of MS have emerged, which may lead to the development of more targeted therapies that can halt or reverse neurodegeneration. Depending on the type and severity of the disease, various disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) are currently used for RRMS/SPMS and PPMS. As a last resort, and especially in highly active RRMS that does not respond to DMTs, autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (AHSCT) is performed and has shown good results in reducing neuroinflammation. Nevertheless, the question of its potential role in preventing disability progression remains open. The aim of this review is to provide a comprehensive update on MS pathophysiology, assessment of MS disability progression and current treatments, and to examine the potential role of AHSCT in preventing disability progression.
RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Much of the current literature on treatment patterns and disability progression in multiple sclerosis (MS) does not distinguish between the relapsing-remitting and progressive subtypes (including primary [PPMS] and secondary progressive MS [SPMS]), or between active/nonactive disease. Current treatment options for progressive MS are limited, with only one approved product for PPMS and none specifically for nonactive SPMS. Here we report treatment patterns, disability progression, and unmet needs among patients with active and nonactive PPMS and SPMS. METHODS: The annual, cross-sectional survey from the Adelphi Disease Specific Program was used to collect physician-reported data on US adult patients with PPMS and SPMS, including active and nonactive disease. Treatment patterns (including the proportion of patients who were untreated with a disease-modifying therapy [DMT]), disability progression, and unmet need are described from 2016 to 2021. RESULTS: Data were collected for 2067 patients with progressive MS (PPMS, 1583; SPMS, 484). A substantial proportion of patients were untreated across all groups, and this was highest for nonactive PPMS (~ 43%). The proportion of untreated patients generally declined over time but remained high in 2018-2021 (~ 10-38%). Among treated patients, the proportion receiving infusions increased over time to ~ 34-46%, largely driven by ocrelizumab use after approval. Disability progression was reported for most patients (> 50%), including many who were receiving a DMT. Across all disease subtypes, when physicians were asked about the greatest unmet need with current DMTs, they most frequently cited effectiveness (~ 63-87%), and specifically slowing disease progression (~ 32-59%). CONCLUSIONS: This analysis of physician-reported data reveals that patients with progressive MS, particularly those with nonactive disease, frequently remain untreated or continue to decline despite treatment with available DMTs. Thus there is an enduring need for safe and effective treatments for this underserved population.
RESUMO
Vitamin D deficiency is involved in the pathogenesis of multiple sclerosis (MS), a severe autoimmune demyelinating disease of the central nervous system. The gene polymorphism Cdx-2 (rs11568820, G/A) seriously influences the trancriptional activity of the vitamin D receptor (VDR) that binds the vitamin D responsive elements of target genes including HLA-DRB1*15. The aim of the present study in Slovaks was to analyse the association of Cdx-2 variants with the risk of MS and disability progression, and to assess the DRB1*15:01 allele as a possible confounding factor. In total, 493 MS patients and 417 healthy controls were involved in this study. The genotyping of Cdx-2 was performed using restriction analysis; DRB1*15:01 positivity was determined by a high-resolution melting analysis of its surrogate marker rs3135388 (G/A). Our results did not prove any allelic association between Cdx-2 and a risk of MS (minor allele A - 0.181 in patients vs. 0.161 in controls, OR = 1.15, .95 CI = 0.90-1.47, p = 0.289). The logistic regression analysis, adjusted for sex and age, showed no differences in Cdx-2 genotype counts when using an additive, dominant or recessive genetic model (p = 0.351, 0.150, 0.240 respectively). The Cdx-2 variants were also not associated with disease disability progression, evaluated using the Multiple Sclerosis Severity Score. The HLA-DRB1*15:01 allele was found to strongly increase the risk of MS in our study (0.300 in patients vs. 0.101 in controls, OR = 3.83, .95 CI = 2.94-4.99, p = 1.016 × 10-26, dominant genetic model OR = 4.62, .95 CI = 3.40-6.26, p = 9.1 × 10-23). In summary, we found the Cdx-2 as a single genetic marker not to be associated with MS development or progression in Slovaks, independently of HLA-DRB1*15:01 status.
Assuntos
Predisposição Genética para Doença , Esclerose Múltipla , Humanos , Predisposição Genética para Doença/genética , Cadeias HLA-DRB1/genética , Esclerose Múltipla/genética , Frequência do Gene , Polimorfismo de Nucleotídeo Único/genética , Genótipo , Alelos , Receptores de CalcitriolRESUMO
BACKGROUND: There is a need in Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis (RRMS) treatment for biomarkers that monitor neuroinflammation, neurodegeneration, treatment response, and disease progression despite treatment. OBJECTIVE: To assess the value of serum glial fibrillary acidic protein (sGFAP) as a biomarker for clinical disease progression and brain volume measurements in natalizumab-treated RRMS patients. METHODS: sGFAP and neurofilament light (sNfL) were measured in an observational cohort of natalizumab-treated RRMS patients at baseline, +3, +12, and +24 months and at the last sample follow-up (median 5.17 years). sGFAP was compared between significant clinical progressors and non-progressors and related to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-derived volumes of the whole brain, ventricle, thalamus, and lesion. The relationship between sGFAP and sNfL was assessed. RESULTS: A total of 88 patients were included, and 47.7% progressed. sGFAP levels at baseline were higher in patients with gadolinium enhancement (1.3-fold difference, p = 0.04) and decreased in 3 months of treatment (adj. p < 0.001). No association was found between longitudinal sGFAP levels and progressor status. sGFAP at baseline and 12 months was significantly associated with normalized ventricular (positively), thalamic (negatively), and lesion volumes (positively). Baseline and 12-month sGFAP predicted annualized ventricle volume change rate after 1 year of treatment. sGFAP correlated with sNfL at baseline (p < 0.001) and last sample follow-up (p < 0.001) but stabilized earlier. DISCUSSION: sGFAP levels related to MRI markers of neuroinflammation and neurodegeneration.
Assuntos
Esclerose Múltipla Recidivante-Remitente , Humanos , Biomarcadores , Meios de Contraste/metabolismo , Progressão da Doença , Gadolínio , Proteína Glial Fibrilar Ácida , Filamentos Intermediários/metabolismo , Esclerose Múltipla Recidivante-Remitente/diagnóstico por imagem , Esclerose Múltipla Recidivante-Remitente/tratamento farmacológico , Esclerose Múltipla Recidivante-Remitente/metabolismo , Natalizumab/uso terapêutico , Proteínas de Neurofilamentos , Doenças NeuroinflamatóriasRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic neurodegenerative inflammatory disease that requires long-term commitment to treatment for optimal outcomes. A variety of disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) are now available that reduce relapses and delay disease progression in people with MS. However, adherence remains a significant issue, with a variety of mental, physical, and emotional factors contributing to non-adherence. In a large number of studies, non-adherence has been associated with worse clinical outcomes (relapses and disease severity), a higher economic burden, and loss of work productivity. However, many of these studies were short-term (1-2 years) or cross-sectional studies; thus, more data are needed on the long-term clinical and economic impacts of DMT non-adherence. The objective of this study was to determine the longer-term impact of adherence to DMTs on disease activity and healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) in people with MS. The study hypothesis was that non-adherence to DMTs would be associated long-term with worse clinical outcomes and a higher economic burden. METHODS: A retrospective administrative claims analysis of the US MarketScan® Commercial database (2011-2017) in individuals (18-65 years) with MS (based on International Classification of Disease coding) was conducted. Adherence was classified by proportion of days covered (PDC) ≥0.8 and non-adherence by PDC <0.8; sensitivity analyses helped further categorize as moderately (PDC ≥0.6-<0.8) or highly (PDC <0.6) non-adherent. Cohorts were matched using propensity score matching. Time to first relapse, annualized relapse rate (ARR), time to use of assistive devices (cane/walker or wheelchair), and annual HCRU (inpatient, emergency room [ER], outpatient, and MRI visits and costs) were compared between cohorts. RESULTS: 10,248 MS cases were identified; 58% met adherence criteria, and 42% met non-adherence criteria. Mean follow-up from diagnosis or first DMT claim was 5.3 years. Adherent individuals had a longer time to first relapse (hazard ratio [HR] 0.83; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.77-0.90; p<0.0001), a lower ARR (0.13 vs. 0.18, respectively; rate ratio [RR] 0.75 [95% CI: 0.71-0.79]; p<0.0001), and longer lag times to cane/walker use (HR 0.79 [95% CI: 0.66-0.94]; p=0.0067) and wheelchair use (HR 0.68 [95% CI: 0.55-0.83]; p=0.0002) than non-adherent individuals. Adherent individuals had fewer annual inpatient and ER visits and lower total costs than those who were non-adherent (p<0.0001). Sensitivity analyses showed that differences in disease activity and HCRU were generally more pronounced between matched adherent and highly non-adherent pairs than between matched adherent and moderately non-adherent pairs. CONCLUSION: Significant differences in MS disease activity and HCRU were observed based on adherence to DMTs. Our study underscores the negative impact of non-adherence to DMTs on long-term clinical and economic outcomes in MS.
Assuntos
Esclerose Múltipla , Humanos , Esclerose Múltipla/psicologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Revisão da Utilização de Seguros , Estudos Transversais , RecidivaRESUMO
Real-world data sources offer opportunities to compare the effectiveness of treatments in practical clinical settings. However, relevant outcomes are often recorded selectively and collected at irregular measurement times. It is therefore common to convert the available visits to a standardized schedule with equally spaced visits. Although more advanced imputation methods exist, they are not designed to recover longitudinal outcome trajectories and typically assume that missingness is non-informative. We, therefore, propose an extension of multilevel multiple imputation methods to facilitate the analysis of real-world outcome data that is collected at irregular observation times. We illustrate multilevel multiple imputation in a case study evaluating two disease-modifying therapies for multiple sclerosis in terms of time to confirmed disability progression. This survival outcome is derived from repeated measurements of the Expanded Disability Status Scale, which is collected when patients come to the healthcare center for a clinical visit and for which longitudinal trajectories can be estimated. Subsequently, we perform a simulation study to compare the performance of multilevel multiple imputation to commonly used single imputation methods. Results indicate that multilevel multiple imputation leads to less biased treatment effect estimates and improves the coverage of confidence intervals, even when outcomes are missing not at random.
Assuntos
Esclerose Múltipla , Humanos , Esclerose Múltipla/tratamento farmacológico , Projetos de Pesquisa , Interpretação Estatística de Dados , Simulação por ComputadorRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The clinical relevance of serum glial fibrillary acidic protein (sGFAP) concentration as a biomarker of MS disability progression independent of acute inflammation has yet to be quantified. OBJECTIVE: To test whether baseline values and longitudinal changes in sGFAP concentration are associated with disability progression without detectable relapse of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) inflammatory activity in participants with secondary-progressive multiple sclerosis (SPMS). METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed longitudinal sGFAP concentration and clinical outcome data from the Phase 3 ASCEND trial of participants with SPMS, with no detectable relapse or MRI signs of inflammatory activity at baseline nor during the study (n = 264). Serum neurofilament (sNfL), sGFAP, T2 lesion volume, Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS), Timed 25-Foot Walk (T25FW), 9-Hole Peg Test (9HPT), and composite confirmed disability progression (CDP) were measured. Linear and logistic regressions and generalized estimating equations were used in the prognostic and dynamic analyses. RESULTS: We found a significant cross-sectional association between baseline sGFAP and sNfL concentrations and T2 lesion volume. No or weak correlations between sGFAP concentration and changes in EDSS, T25FW, and 9HPT, or CDP were observed. CONCLUSION: Without inflammatory activity, changes in sGFAP concentration in participants with SPMS were neither associated with current nor predictive of future disability progression.
Assuntos
Esclerose Múltipla Crônica Progressiva , Esclerose Múltipla , Humanos , Esclerose Múltipla/diagnóstico , Proteína Glial Fibrilar Ácida , Filamentos Intermediários/metabolismo , Estudos Transversais , Estudos Retrospectivos , Esclerose Múltipla Crônica Progressiva/diagnóstico por imagem , Esclerose Múltipla Crônica Progressiva/metabolismo , Biomarcadores , Inflamação/metabolismoRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: The diagnosis of the progression phase of Multiple Sclerosis (MS) is still retrospective and based on the objectivation of clinical disability accumulation. OBJECTIVES: To assess whether the Patient Reported Outcomes Measures (PROMs) scores predict the occurrence of disease progression within three years of follow-up. METHODS: Observational prospective multicenter study. Stable Relapsing-Remitting MS (RRMS) patients were enrolled. At enrollment, patients completed the following PROMs: Beck Depression Inventory- II, The Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medications, Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 36- Item (SF36), Fatigue Severity Scale. EDSS was assessed at enrollment and three years later. The outcome measure was defined as the occurrence of confirmed disability progression (CDP) within three years of follow-up. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression models were performed to study the association between the final score of each test and the outcome. RESULTS: SF36-Physical Functioning (SF36-PF) was the only independent variable associated with the outcome. The ROC curve analysis determined a score of 77.5 at SF36-PF as the cut-off point identifying patients experiencing CDP within three years of follow-up [AUC: 0.66 (95% CI: 0.56-0.75)]. CONCLUSIONS: RRMS patients scoring higher (>77.5) at SF36-PF subscale have a higher likelihood to experience CDP within the next three years.
Assuntos
Esclerose Múltipla Recidivante-Remitente , Esclerose Múltipla , Humanos , Esclerose Múltipla Recidivante-Remitente/diagnóstico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estudos Prospectivos , Qualidade de Vida , Exercício FísicoRESUMO
Disability accrual is mainly driven by progression independent of relapse activity, which is present even in early stages of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) and sometimes overlooked. This multicenter, non-interventional study evaluated whether patient-reported outcomes measures (PROMs) could capture disability in 189 early-stage RRMS patients (mean age: 36.1 ± 9.4 years, 71.4% female, mean disease duration: 1.4 ± 0.8 years, median EDSS: 1.0). The 9-Hole Peg Test (9-HPT), NeuroQoL Upper Extremity (NeuroQoL-UE), Timed 25-Foot Walk (T25-FW), Multiple Sclerosis Walking Scale (MSWS-12), Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT), and Perceived Deficits Questionnaire (PDQ-5) were used to assess hand function, gait, and cognition, respectively. These functions were at least mildly affected in this early-stage population, finding significant correlations between PROMs and clinical assessments. PROMs could enable early-stage RRMS patients to communicate their perceived disability in different domains, assisting clinicians in disease monitoring and decision making.
RESUMO
This study aimed to determine whether peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (pRNFL) and ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer (GCIPL) thickness thresholds for single-time-point swept-source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT) measures can differentiate the clinical outcomes of treatment-naïve people with multiple sclerosis (pwMS). A total of 275 patients with the clinically isolated syndrome (n = 23), benign MS (n = 8), relapsing-remitting MS (n = 185), secondary progressive MS (n = 28), primary progressive MS (n = 31), and with no history of optic neuritis were included. The mean Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score was 3.0 ± 1.6. The cut-off values of pRNFL (87 µm and 88 µm) and GCIPL (70 µm) thicknesses have been adopted from previous studies using spectral-domain OCT. PwMS with pRNFL ≤87 µm and ≤88 µm had a longer disease duration, more advanced disability, and more frequently progressive MS variants compared to those with greater pRNFL thicknesses. In distinguishing pwMS with disability greater than or equal to the mean EDSS score (EDSS ≥ 3) from those with less severe disability, GCIPL thickness <70 µm had the highest sensitivity, while pRNFL thickness ≤87 µm had the greatest specificity. The optimal cut-off values differentiating patients with EDSS ≥ 3 from those with less severe disability was 63 µm for GCIPL thickness and 93.5 µm for pRNFL thickness. In conclusion, pRNFL and GCIPL thickness thresholds for single-time-point SS-OCT measurements may be helpful in differentiating the disability status of treatment-naïve pwMS.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic, inflammatory, demyelinating, degenerative disease of the central nervous system that affects approximately 2.8 million people worldwide. Compelling evidence from observational studies and clinical trials indicates a strong association between brain volume loss (BVL) and the accumulation of disability in MS. However, the considerable heterogeneity in study designs and methods of assessment of BVL invites questions concerning the generalizability of the reported findings. Therefore, we conducted this systematic review to characterize the relationship between BVL and physical disability in patients with MS. METHODS: A systematic literature search of MEDLINE and EMBASE databases was performed supplemented by gray literature searches. The following study designs were included: prospective/retrospective cohort, cross-sectional and case-control. Only English language articles published from 2010 onwards were eligible for final inclusion. There were no restrictions on MS subtype, age, or ethnicity. Of the 1620 citations retrieved by the structured searches, 50 publications met our screening criteria and were included in the final data set. RESULTS: Across all BVL measures, there was considerable heterogeneity in studies regarding the underlying study population, the definitions of BVL and image analysis methodologies, the physical disability measure used, the measures of association reported and whether the analysis conducted was univariable or multivariable. A total of 36 primary studies providing data on the association between whole BVL and physical disability in MS collectively suggest that whole brain atrophy is associated with greater physical disability progression in MS patients. Similarly, a total of 15 primary studies providing data on the association between ventricular atrophy and physical disability in MS suggest that ventricular atrophy is associated with greater physical disability progression in MS patients. Along similar lines, the existing evidence based on a total of 13 primary studies suggests that gray matter atrophy is associated with greater physical disability progression in MS patients. Four primary studies suggest that corpus callosum atrophy is associated with greater physical disability progression in MS patients. The majority of the existing evidence (6 primary studies) suggests no association between white matter atrophy and physical disability in MS. It is difficult to assign a relationship between basal ganglia volume loss and physical disability as well as medulla oblongata width and physical disability in MS due to very limited data. CONCLUSION: The evidence gathered from this systematic review, although very heterogeneous, suggests that whole brain atrophy is associated with greater physical disability progression in MS patients. Our review can help define future imaging biomarkers for physical disability progression and treatment monitoring in MS.
Assuntos
Esclerose Múltipla , Humanos , Esclerose Múltipla/tratamento farmacológico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estudos Transversais , Estudos Prospectivos , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética , Encéfalo/diagnóstico por imagem , Encéfalo/patologia , Atrofia/patologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Upper and lower limb disabilities are hypothesized to have partially independent underlying (network) disturbances in multiple sclerosis (MS). OBJECTIVE: This study investigated functional network predictors and longitudinal network changes related to upper and lower limb progression in MS. METHODS: Two-hundred fourteen MS patients and 58 controls underwent functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), dexterity (9-Hole Peg Test) and mobility (Timed 25-Foot Walk) measurements (baseline and 5 years). Patients were stratified into progressors (>20% decline) or non-progressors. Functional network efficiency was calculated using static (over entire scan) and dynamic (fluctuations during scan) approaches. Baseline measurements were used to predict progression; significant predictors were explored over time. RESULTS: In both limbs, progression was related to supplementary motor area and caudate efficiency (dynamic and static, respectively). Upper limb progression showed additional specific predictors; cortical grey matter volume, putamen static efficiency and posterior associative sensory (PAS) cortex, putamen, primary somatosensory cortex and thalamus dynamic efficiency. Additional lower limb predictors included motor network grey matter volume, caudate (dynamic) and PAS (static). Only the caudate showed a decline in efficiency over time in one group (non-progressors). CONCLUSION: Disability progression can be predicted using sensorimotor network measures. Upper and lower limb progression showed unique predictors, possibly indicating different network disturbances underlying these types of progression in MS.