5-years patency results of Zilver PTX on the femoro-popliteal arterial segment: A Northern Sydney experience.

BACKGROUND: The burden of peripheral arterial disease is increasing. Treatment of femoro-popliteal lesions remains challenging despite novel endovascular devices. Drug-eluting stents suppress post-treatment inflammation and reducing neo-intimal hyperplasia to reduce in-stent restenosis. METHODS: A multi-centre retrospective 5-years longitudinal study was undertaken to evaluate freedom from clinically driven target limb revascularisation (FF CD-TLR) and patency of Zilver PTX stents in treating symptomatic femoro-popliteal stenotic lesions. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were used to demonstrate FF CD-TLR, primary, primary assisted and secondary patency. RESULTS: There were 148 patients and 183 lesions treated with a mean age of 80.3 years and 52% males. The all-cause 5-years mortality was 25%. FF CD-TLR yearly patencies to 5 years were 81%, 67%, 62%, 57% and 52%, respectively, with significantly poorer outcomes for in-stent restenosis, longer stent lengths and lesions at the femoro-popliteal junction. Primary patencies were 63%, 47%, 40%, 34% and 24%, assisted primary patencies were 90%, 75%, 68%, 59% and 48% and secondary patencies were 96%, 94%, 94%, 92% and 92%. Major adverse limb events were 5% at 1-year and cumulative at 5-years was 16%. DISCUSSION: The clinical outcomes in this study population are comparable to recent publications with smaller cohorts. Our study confirms Zilver PTX has very good primary patency over 5 years with no discernible effect on all-cause mortality in an elderly cohort with particularly long treated lesions. Our results are similar to those seen in younger patients with shorter lesions. Nonetheless, longer lesions required more reinterventions to maintain patency. CONCLUSION: Zilver PTX is a safe and durable drug-eluting stent when utilised in the management of femoro-popliteal stenotic lesions with good long-term patency and limited need for re-intervention.

Clinical Significance of Optical Coherence Tomography-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for In-Stent Restenosis Within Drug-Eluting Stents: Impact on Patient Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: The evidence for optical coherence tomography (OCT)-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in improving the prognosis of individuals with in-stent restenosis (ISR) is lacking. METHODS AND RESULTS: This retrospective study enrolled 588 consecutive individuals with drug-eluting stent ISR undergoing PCI from March 2010 to March 2022. Two hundred seven (35.2%) underwent OCT guidance, and 381 (64.8%) underwent angiography guidance. Clinical outcomes were analyzed using survival curves. The primary clinical endpoint was 2-year major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs), a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, and target-vessel revascularization. Compared with angiography guidance, OCT guidance demonstrated a higher frequency of drug-coated balloon use and adjunctive therapeutic modalities, including predilation, postdilation, nonslip element balloons, and noncompliant balloons (P<0.05). Following PCI, the OCT-guided group achieved a significantly larger minimum lumen diameter (2.36 versus 2.15 mm, P<0.001) and a lower percentage diameter stenosis (17% versus 20%, P<0.001) than the angiography-guided group. Survival analysis revealed significantly lower 2-year MACEs in the OCT-guided group compared with the angiography-guided group (7% versus 15%, P=0.007), validated in the propensity matching analysis (7% versus 15%, P=0.001). Multiple sensitivity analyses showed that OCT-guided PCI treatment was an independent protective factor for 2-year MACEs in individuals with drug-eluting stent ISR. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with angiography guidance, OCT guidance is associated with a lower 2-year MACE risk among individuals with drug-eluting stent ISR. Therefore, OCT should be actively considered for guiding PCI treatment in individuals with drug-eluting stent ISR. REGISTRATION: Url: clinicaltrials.gov. Identifier: NCT03809754.

Differences in vascular tissue response after stent implantation between biolimus-eluting and everolimus-eluting stents: a sub-study of the NEXT study.

NEXT [NOBORI biolimus-eluting stent (BES) versus XIENCE/PROMUS everolimus-eluting stent (EES) trial] was a multicenter, randomized, prospective trial that included 3235 patients with 8-12 months of follow-up imaging at 18 centers. IB-IVUS images were analyzed at an interval of 0.5 mm using a motorized pull-back system in each plaque that required stent implantation. We analyzed seven cross-sections at the site of minimal lumen area and ten cross-sections in proximal and distal peripheral sites prior to the procedure, after stent implantation and after 8 months. We averaged the relative blue volume, relative green volume, relative yellow volume, and relative red volume across seven cross-sections using the manufacturer's default setting. Fifty-four lesions in 50 patients were analyzed. There were 28 lesions in 25 patients in the EES group and 26 lesions in 25 patients in the BES group. The patient characteristics did not differ significantly between the two groups except high-density lipoprotein cholesterol. There were no significant differences before and after stent implantation after 8 months in relative red volume, relative yellow volume, relative green volume or relative blue volume. Although the present study was likely underpowered for statistical analyses and larger populations are needed to confirm the conclusions, the vascular response regarding tissue characterization was similar between EES and BES, even though the thickness and releasing materials differed between the stents.

A Prospective, Randomized Trial of Bioresorbable Polymer Drug-Eluting Stents versus Fully Bioresorbable Scaffolds in Patients Undergoing Coronary Stenting.

Background: The performance of an everolimus-eluting bioresorbable scaffold (BRS) was inferior to an everolimus-eluting metallic drug-eluting stent (DES) with permanent polymer, mainly due the mechanical features of BRS technology. The performance of BRS as compared to metallic DES with bioresorbable polymers remains unstudied. Methods: This prospective, randomized, multicenter, clinical trial enrolled patients who underwent coronary stenting for de novo coronary lesions. Patients were randomly assigned to bioresorbable polymer everolimus-eluting stents (BP-EES) or everolimus-eluting BRS. The primary endpoint was percentage diameter stenosis (in-device) at 6- to 8-month angiographic surveillance. The main secondary endpoint was the device-oriented composite endpoint (DOCE) of cardiac death/target vessel-myocardial infarction/target lesion revascularization assessed after 12 months and 5 years. Results: The trial was prematurely terminated after the enrollment of 117 of 230 patients (BP-EES, n = 60; BRS, n = 57) due to safety issues associated with BRS technology. The primary endpoint of in-device diameter stenosis at angiographic surveillance was 12.5 ± 7.7% with BP-EES versus 19.3 ± 16.5% with BRS (p = 0.01). The DOCE occurred in 5.0% in the BP-EES group versus 12.3% of patients in the BRS group (hazard ratio [HR] 2.48, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.64-9.58, p = 0.19) after 12 months and in 11.7% in the BP-EES group versus 26.4% of patients in the BRS group (HR 2.38, 95% CI 0.97-5.84, p = 0.06) after 5 years. Conclusions: BP-EES showed superior mid-term angiographic performance compared with BRS. Clinical event rates did not differ significantly between the groups up to 5 years of follow-up. These results should be interpreted with caution in view of the premature discontinuation of the study.

Use of Onyx Frontier™ for intracranial stenting in stroke patients: A multicenter retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Acute ischemic stroke (AIS) due to intracranial atherosclerotic disease (ICAD) carries a high risk of recurrence despite aggressive medical management. The aim of our study is to present our initial experience with the Onyx Frontier™ balloon-mounted drug-eluting stent (Medtronic, Santa Rosa, CA) for AIS due to ICAD. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter retrospective cohort study describing the technical feasibility, safety, and performance of using the Onyx Frontier™ balloon-mounted drug-eluting stent in patients with acute intracranial vessel occlusion due to ICAD across three comprehensive stroke centers in the United States. RESULTS: We included 23 patients in our study (mean age 67.3 [10.7]; females: n = 13/23, 56.5%). Most patients were Black (n = 14/23, 60.9%). The most common site of vessel occlusion was the M1 branch of the middle cerebral artery (MCA) (n = 14/23, 60.9%), followed by the vertebrobasilar system (n = 5/23, 21.7%), and the internal carotid artery (n = 3/23, 13.0%). Treatment with the Onyx Frontier™ stent was associated with a final mTICI score ≥2b for 100% of patients, with no vessel perforations or distal embolization. None of the patients had any restenosis or re-treatment over a median follow-up of 3.5 months (interquartile range [IQR] 7.8). All cases required a single stent except for one, where two were deployed. Transfemoral access was used in most cases (n = 18/23, 78.3%), with one in-hospital death due to access site complication (n = 1/23, 4.3%). CONCLUSIONS: This is the largest multicenter cohort study demonstrating the feasibility and safety of using the Onyx Frontier™ balloon-mounted zotarolimus-eluting stent to treat symptomatic AIS due to ICAD.

Drug-coated balloons in high-risk patients and diabetes mellitus: A meta-analysis of 10 studies.

BACKGROUND: Despite the improvements in drug eluting stents (DES) technology, suboptimal results have been observed in certain higher-risk subsets of patients, as in diabetes mellitus (DM). Drug-coated balloons (DCB) could represent an alternative to DES in complex populations and anatomies, as in DM. AIMS: The present meta-analysis aimed at assessing the role of DCBs in patients with diabetes mellitus. METHODS: Studies comparing DCB versus percutaneous coronary revascularization (PCI) with/without DES for PCI in high-risk populations (>30% DM) were included. The primary efficacy endpoint was overall mortality, secondary endpoints were myocardial infarction, target lesion revascularization (TLR), and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). RESULTS: We included 10 studies, comprising 2026 patients. Among them, 1002 patients (49.5%) were treated with DCB and 1024 with DES implantation. Among the included studies, 6 only enrolled diabetic patients and 2 had a prevalence of diabetes of 50%. At a mean follow-up of 15.3 months, mortality rate was 3.8% (82 patients), significantly lower with DCB (3.2% vs. 4.9% with DES; odds ratio [OR] [95% confidence interval {CI}] = 0.61 [0.38, 0.97], p = 0.04 phet = 0.34. A similar reduction in favor of DCB was observed for MACE (13.6% vs. 17.6%; OR [95% CI] = 0.79 [0.61, 1.04], p = 0.09, phet = 0.25), while TLR was significantly reduced only in the diabetic-restricted sub-analysis. CONCLUSION: In the present meta-analysis, we showed a significant survival benefit and an absolute reduction in MACE and TLR with a DCB-based strategy as compared to DES in high-risk patients, mostly with DM. Future large-scale randomized trials, dedicated to this population, are deserved to confirm our findings. WHAT IS KNOWN: Complex coronary anatomies and diabetes mellitus (DM) represent the pitfall of drug eluting stents (DES), mainly due to inflammatory and thrombotic complications, which should be reduced with drug-coated balloons (DCB). WHAT IS NEW: We confirmed a significant advantage of DCB versus DES in the treatment of de novo lesions in high-risk patients and mainly in DM, reducing overall mortality, MACE and target lesion revascularization.

Long-term outcomes of DCB and DES for the treatment of in-stent restenosis in relation to the vessel size.

BACKGROUND: Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with drug-coated balloons (DCB) or drug-eluting stents (DES) are well-established treatments for in-stent restenosis, however little is known about the impact of vessel size on the outcomes. The study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety profile of DCB versus DES in DES in-stent restenosis depending on the vessel size. METHODS: Consecutive patients with DES in-stent restenosis who underwent PCI between January 2010 and February 2018 entered the registry with a long-term follow-up. Patients who received DCB at the index procedure were compared with those who received DES in three subgroups depending on the vessel size (≤2.5 mm; 2.5-3.5 mm; >3.5 mm). Data were analyzed using propensity score matching and Kaplan-Meier estimator plots. RESULTS: Among 1,374 patients with DES in-stent restenosis, 615 were treated with DES and 759 with DCB. After propensity score matching, we analyzed 752 patients in the DES and DCB groups at a long-term follow-up. The risk of DOCE did not differ significantly between the DES and DCB groups, both in the overall population (HR 0.85; 95%CI [0.58; 1.26], log-rank p = 0.41) and when divided into small (HR 0.84; 95%CI [0.36; 1.95], log-rank p = 0.70), medium-sized (HR 0.90; 95%CI [0.49; 1.65], log-rank p = 0.73), and large-sized (HR 0.81; 95%CI [0.42; 1.53], log-rank p = 0.50) coronary arteries. The incidence of all-cause death was significantly higher in the overall DES population (HR 4.03; 95%CI [2.40; 6.79], log-rank p < 0.001) and subgroup of small (HR 5.54; 95%CI [1.80; 17.02], log-rank p = 0.003), medium-sized (HR 4.37; 95%CI [1.92; 9.94], log-rank p = 0.009) and large-sized coronary arteries (HR 3.26; 95%CI [1.35; 7.86], log-rank p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: DES and DCB strategies are comparable methods of treating ISR regardless of the diameter of the treated vessel in a long-term follow-up.

Early vascular healing after neXt-generation drug-eluting stent implantation in Patients with non-ST elevation acute Coronary syndrome: a randomized optical coherence Tomography imaging study (EXPECT).

Early vascular healing after drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation is associated with better outcomes and lower incidence of in-stent thrombosis. To examine vascular healing response in patients with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) guided by optical coherence tomography (OCT) versus angiography alone. Sixty patients were randomized 1:1:1 to OCT-guided PCI with 3-month OCT follow-up (O3 group, n = 20), angiography-guided PCI with 3-month OCT follow-up (A3 group, n = 20), or angiography-guided PCI with 6-month OCT follow-up (A6 group, n = 20). The primary endpoint was the proportion of covered struts at 3- or 6-month follow-up. The proportion of covered struts in the O3 group was significantly higher than in the A3 group (95.2% vs. 92.3%, p < 0.001), but lower than in the A6 group (95.2% vs. 97.4%, p < 0.001). The O3 group had a lower proportion of incomplete strut apposition (ISA) than the A3 group (0.46% vs. 0.76%, p = 0.006), and higher than the A6 group (0.46% vs. 0.27%, p = 0.018) at follow-up. The optimal cut-off value of ISA after implantation of DES for predicting stent coverage at 3 and 6-month follow-up was 200 µm and 308 µm, respectively. Only one patient experienced target lesion revascularization in the A3 group during a 3-year clinical follow-up. In patients with NSTE-ACS undergoing PCI with DES, OCT guidance achieved higher strut coverage compared with angiography guidance at 3-month follow-up. However, the difference in the strut coverage between the OCT-guided group and the angiography-guided group at 6 months indicates that the degree of endothelialization may be more time-dependent instead of invasive device guidance.

Drug-Coated Balloon Angioplasty of the Side Branch During Provisional Stenting: The Multicenter Randomized DCB-BIF Trial.

BACKGROUND: Side branch stenting is often required during provisional stenting, leading to suboptimal results. Drug-coated balloons (DCB) for the compromised side branch have emerged as an attractive strategy. However, the benefit of DCB for coronary bifurcations remains unclear. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to investigate whether DCB, compared with a noncompliant balloon (NCB), for the pinched side branch improves the outcomes of provisional stenting in patients with simple, true coronary bifurcations. METHODS: In this multicenter, randomized controlled trial, patients with true coronary bifurcations who had side branch diameter stenosis of ≥70% after main vessel stenting at 22 centers in China, Indonesia, Italy, and Korea were randomly assigned to either DCB or NCB intervention. The primary endpoint was major adverse cardiac events, a composite of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, or clinically driven target-lesion revascularization at the 1-year follow-up. RESULTS: Between September 8, 2020, and June 2, 2023, 784 patients with true coronary bifurcation lesions undergoing main vessel stenting and having a severely compromised side branch were randomly assigned to the DCB (n = 391) or NCB (n = 393) group. One-year follow-up was completed in all patients. The primary endpoint occurred in 28 patients in the DCB group and 49 patients in the NCB group (Kaplan-Meier rate: 7.2% vs 12.5%; HR: 0.56; 95% CI: 0.35-0.88; P = 0.013), driven by a reduction in myocardial infarction. There were no significant differences between groups in procedural success, crossover to a 2-stent approach, all-cause death, revascularization, or stent thrombosis. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with simple and true coronary bifurcation lesions undergoing provisional stenting, main vessel stenting with a DCB for the compromised side branch resulted in a lower 1-year rate of the composite outcome compared with an NCB intervention for the side branch. The high rates of periprocedural myocardial infarction, which occurred early and did not lead to revascularization, are of unclear clinical significance.

Randomized Comparison of Novel Low-Dose Sirolimus-Eluting Biodegradable Polymer Stent vs Second-Generation DES: TARGET-IV NA Trial.

BACKGROUND: Drug-eluting stents (DESs) with controlled antiproliferative drug release reduce restenosis risk, but durable polymers can delay healing and inhibit reendothelialization. The Firehawk biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting stent (BP-SES) has a fully biodegradable sirolimus-containing polymer coating localized to recessed abluminal grooves on the stent surface and delivers roughly one-third the drug dose of other DESs. OBJECTIVES: We report the primary results of the TARGET-IV NA (Firehawk Rapamycin Target Eluting Coronary Stent North American Trial) randomized controlled trial comparing clinical outcomes with BP-SES vs currently used second-generation DESs. METHODS: The TARGET-IV NA study was a prospective, multicenter, single-blind, 1:1 randomized noninferiority trial comparing the BP-SES with control in North America and Europe among patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for chronic or acute coronary syndromes. The primary endpoint was target lesion failure (TLF) at 12 months (composite of cardiac death, target vessel-related myocardial infarction, or ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization). The primary analysis (intention-to-treat) tested noninferiority of BP-SES vs control using an absolute margin of 3.85% and 1-sided α of 0.025. Noninferiority-powered secondary endpoints were tested in an optical coherence tomography substudy (endpoint: mean neointimal hyperplasia thickness) and an angiography substudy (endpoint: in-stent late lumen loss). RESULTS: A total of 1,720 patients (mean age 66 years; 74% male) with 2,159 lesions were randomly allocated to receive either BP-SES (860 patients, 1,057 lesions) or control second-generation DES (860 patients, 1,084 lesions). A total of 61% of patients presented with stable coronary disease, 32% had unstable angina, and 7% had non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) or recent ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. The rate of TLF with BP-SES was noninferior to control at 12 months (3.4% vs 3.3%, absolute risk difference 0.13%, upper bound 97.5% CI: 2.03, Pnoninferiority < 0.0001). Cardiac death, myocardial infarction, and stent thrombosis rates were similar between groups. Angiographic follow-up was available in 104 patients (97.2% of those enrolled in the angiographic substudy) and 128 (94.1%) lesions. At 13 months, the powered secondary endpoint of mean in-stent late lumen loss was 0.149 ± 0.263 mm for BP-SES and 0.327 ± 0.463 mm for control (least squares mean difference: -0.178; 90% CI: -0.2943 to -0.0632; Pnoninferiority < 0.0001). The optical coherence tomography substudy included 37 patients (42 lesions) with no difference in mean neointimal hyperplasia thickness between groups at 13 months (Pnoninferiority = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting stent was noninferior to currently used second-generation DES with regard to TLF at 1 year. (Firehawk® Rapamycin Target Eluting Coronary Stent North American Trial; NCT04562532).

Clinical Outcomes After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Left Main Coronary Artery Disease in Patients of Diverse Race/Ethnicity.

Data on percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for left main coronary artery (LMCA) disease in patients of diverse race/ethnicity is scant. The aim of the study was to assess the impact of race/ethnicity on clinical outcomes at 12-month follow-up of patients with LMCA disease undergoing PCI with drug-eluting stent implantation. All patients undergoing PCI for LMCA disease between 2010 and 2019 at a tertiary care center were prospectively enrolled. Clinical outcomes were assessed per each race/ethnic group. The primary endpoint was the composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction (MI), or stroke at 12 months. A total of 774 consecutive patients with known race/ethnicity were prospectively enrolled, 62.1% (n=481) Caucasians, 17.2% (n=133) Hispanics, 12.7% (n=98) Asians and 8.0% (n=62) African Americans. Compared with Caucasians, the hazard rate of the primary endpoint tended to be lower in Asian patients (6.1% vs 14.2%; hazard ratio [HR]: 0.41; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.16-1.03), and similar in African American (13.7% vs 14.2%; HR: 0.93; 95% CI: 0.40-2.16) and Hispanic patients (14.2% vs 14.2%; HR: 1.02; 95% CI: 0.58-1.78). Hazard rates of target vessel or lesion revascularization were comparable in the four groups. Cox multivariable regression adjustment confirmed consistent findings and revealed higher hazard rate of post-discharge bleeding in African Americans vs. Caucasians (HR: 5.89; 95% CI: 1.00-34.5). In conclusion, within a racially/ethnically diverse cohort of patients undergoing PCI for LMCA disease, when compared with Caucasians, Asians are at lower risk of all-cause death, MI or stroke, while African Americans are at increased risk of post-discharge bleeding.

Renal Function-Stratified Comparison of Short- and Long-Term Dual Antiplatelet Therapy in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Third-Generation Drug-Eluting Stents　- Post Hoc Analysis From the HOST-IDEA Randomized Clinical Trial.

BACKGROUND: The optimal duration of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) in patients with chronic kidney disease undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), especially with third-generation drug-eluting stents (DES), remains unknown. METHODS AND RESULTS: We conducted a prespecified post hoc analysis of the HOST-IDEA trial, randomizing patients undergoing PCI with third-generation DES to 3- to 6-month or 12-month DAPT. In all, 1,997 patients were grouped by their estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR): high (>90 mL/min/1.73 m2), intermediate (60-90 mL/min/1.73 m2), and low (<60 mL/min/1.73 m2). The primary outcome was net adverse clinical events (NACE), a composite of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, clinically driven target lesion revascularization, stent thrombosis, or major bleeding (Bleeding Academic Research Consortium Type 3 or 5) at 12 months. Secondary outcomes were target lesion failure (TLF) and major bleeding. The low eGFR group had the highest rates of NACE, TLF, and major bleeding compared with the other 2 groups (P<0.001). Rates of NACE were similar in the 3- to 6-month and 12-month DAPT in the high (2.9% vs. 3.2%; P=0.84), intermediate (2.1% vs. 2.8%, P=0.51), and low (8.9% vs. 9.1%; hazard ratio 0.99; P=0.97; Pinteraction=0.88) eGFR groups. TLF and major bleeding events showed similar trends. CONCLUSIONS: In patients undergoing PCI with third-generation DES, 3- to 6-month DAPT was comparable to 12-month DAPT for clinical outcomes regardless of renal function.

Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stent as Bailout Stenting for Below-the-Knee Artery Repair in Patients with Critical Limb-Threatening Ischemia: A Real-World National Registry.

OBJECTIVES: Percutaneous old balloon angioplasty is still the preferred treatment for the treatment of below-the-knee (BTK) arteries in chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI). In the case of a suboptimal angioplasty result, a bailout stenting is required. So far, few data are available to assess the outcomes of bailout stenting after BTK angioplasty. This study aims to investigate the 1-year efficacy and safety after implantation of a polymer everolimus-eluting stent (PEES) as bailout stenting for BTK repair in patients with CLTI in a real-world setting. DESIGN: This was a national multicenter prospective observational study. METHODS: Patients with CLTI (Rutherford 4 to 6) BTK lesions (including P3) and requiring a bailout PEES due to dissection, thrombosis, or residual stenosis ≥30% after angioplasty were included. The freedom of a major adverse limb event at 12 months of the target limb was the primary endpoint. RESULTS: XIENCE assessed 106 limbs (CLTI, 96.2%; chronic total occlusion, 2.8%) in 106 patients (mean age 77.1 years; males, 71.7%; diabetes mellitus, 66.9%; chronic kidney failure, 36.8%) with CLTI undergoing PEES stenting as a bailout for BTK lesions. Bailout stenting was required after 75.5% and 26.4% of residual stenosis and dissection, respectively. The mean diameter and length of the PEES were 3 mm and 3.4 ± 0.5 cm, respectively. At 1 year, the freedom of a major adverse limb event was 79.6% (95% CI, 71.5%-88.7%), the major amputation rate was 6.2% (95% CI, 1.3%-11%), and the target revascularization rate was 14.9% (95% CI, 6.5%-22.5%). CONCLUSIONS: In CLTI patients with BTK lesions, PEES stenting showed safety and efficacy as bailout stenting for BTK arterial lesions. This confirms the need for PEES stenting in a real-world practice. CLINICAL IMPACT: The XIENCE study introduces the PEES as an effective bailout stenting option for patients with CLTI undergoing BTK revascularization, particularly for lesions under 4 cm. The study focuses on real-world cases where POBA alone is insufficient, demonstrating that PEES significantly improves outcomes by enhancing limb salvage and reducing the need for major amputations. For clinicians, this innovation offers a precise, size-adaptable solution, especially in cases where bailout stenting is required for short, focal lesions, improving both clinical and procedural results.

Aspirin Monotherapy vs No Antiplatelet Therapy in Stable Patients With Coronary Stents Undergoing Low-to-Intermediate Risk Noncardiac Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Current guidelines recommend the perioperative continuation of aspirin in patients with coronary drug-eluting stents (DES) undergoing noncardiac surgery. However, supporting evidence is limited. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to compare continuing aspirin monotherapy vs temporarily holding all antiplatelet therapy before noncardiac surgery in patients with previous DES implantation. METHODS: We randomly assigned patients who had received a DES >1 year previously and were undergoing elective noncardiac surgery either to continue aspirin or to discontinue all antiplatelet agents 5 days before noncardiac surgery. Antiplatelet therapy was recommended to be resumed no later than 48 hours after surgery, unless contraindicated. The primary outcome was a composite of death from any cause, myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis, or stroke between 5 days before and 30 days after noncardiac surgery. RESULTS: A total of 1,010 patients underwent randomization. Among 926 patients in the modified intention-to-treat population (462 patients in aspirin monotherapy group and 464 patients in the no-antiplatelet therapy group), the primary composite outcome occurred in 3 patients (0.6%) in the aspirin monotherapy group and 4 patients (0.9%) in the no antiplatelet group (difference, -0.2 percentage points; 95% CI: -1.3 to 0.9; P > 0.99). There was no stent thrombosis in either group. The incidence of major bleeding did not differ significantly between groups (6.5% vs 5.2%; P = 0.39), whereas minor bleeding was significantly more frequent in the aspirin group (14.9% vs 10.1%; P = 0.027). CONCLUSIONS: Among patients undergoing low-to-intermediate risk noncardiac surgery >1 year after stent implantation primarily with a DES, in the setting of lower-than-expected event rates, we failed to identify a significant difference between perioperative aspirin monotherapy and no antiplatelet therapy with respect to ischemic outcomes or major bleeding. (Perioperative Antiplatelet Therapy in Patients With Drug-eluting Stent Undergoing Noncardiac Surgery [ASSURE-DES]; NCT02797548).

Long-term effect of biodegradable vs durable polymer everolimus-eluting stents on neoatherosclerosis in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: the CONNECT trial.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Neoatherosclerosis is a leading cause of late (>1 year) stent failure following drug-eluting stent implantation. The role of biodegradable (BP) versus durable polymer (DP) drug-eluting stents on long-term occurrence of neoatherosclerosis remains unclear. Superiority of biodegradable against durable polymer current generation thin-strut everolimus-eluting stent (EES) was tested by assessing the frequency of neoatherosclerosis 3 years after primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI) among patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). METHODS: The randomized controlled, multicentre (Japan and Switzerland) CONNECT trial (NCT03440801) randomly (1:1) assigned 239 STEMI patients to pPCI with BP-EES or DP-EES. The primary endpoint was the frequency of neoatherosclerosis assessed by optical coherence tomography (OCT) at 3 years. Neoatherosclerosis was defined as fibroatheroma or fibrocalcific plaque or macrophage accumulation within the neointima. RESULTS: Among 239 STEMI patients randomized, 236 received pPCI with stent implantation (119 BP-EES; 117 DP-EES). A total of 178 patients (75%; 88 in the BP-EES group and 90 in the DP-EES group) underwent OCT assessment at 3 years. Neoatherosclerosis did not differ between the BP-EES (11.4%) and DP-EES (13.3%; odds ratio 0.83, 95% confidence interval 0.33-2.04, p=0.69). There were no differences in the frequency of fibroatheroma (BP-EES 9.1% vs DP-EES 11.1%, p=0.66) or macrophage accumulation (BP-EES 4.5% vs DP-EES 3.3%, p=0.68), and no fibrocalcific neoatherosclerosis was observed. Rates of target lesion failure did not differ between groups (BP-EES 5.9% vs DP-EES 6.0%, p=0.97). CONCLUSIONS: Use of BP-EES for primary PCI in patients presenting with STEMI was not superior to DP-EES regarding frequency of neoatherosclerosis at 3 years.

Clinical outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention for severely calcified lesions: comparison between the morphologies of severely calcified coronary lesions.

Existing studies evaluating the comparison of clinical outcome of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for severe calcified coronary lesions are limited, and the clinical outcomes of PCI for different morphologies of calcified lesions are controversial. Overall, consecutive 576 lesions with severe calcification that were treated with PCI from 2010 to 2021 at Nagoya Heart Center were investigated. All lesions were assessed using invasive coronary angiogram (CAG) or computed tomography-CAG at 12 months after DES implantation. We divided the patients into three groups based on the results of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) imaging (concentric calcified lesion [CC] n = 273, eccentric calcified lesion [EC] n = 217, calcified nodule [CN] n = 86). The clinical and angiographic outcomes of each group were investigated retrospectively to compare the prognosis between the three groups and identify predictive factors for the device-oriented composite end points (DoCE). There were no differences in patient characteristics among the three groups, except that there were significantly more patients on dialysis in the CN group. The incidence of DoCE was significantly higher in the CN group than in the other groups (CC; 18.3% vs. EC; 23.5% vs. CN; 36.0%; Log-Rank test; p = 0.001). Cox regression analysis showed that the independent predictors of DoCE were CN, insulin use, hemodialysis, right coronary artery lesions, and calcium cracks. The incidence of DoCE was significantly higher in the CN group. Calcium cracks are crucial for improving outcomes in severely calcified lesions, being key predictors of DoCE.

Ten-year clinical outcomes of everolimus- and biolimus-eluting coronary stents vs. everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffolds-insights from the EVERBIO-2 trial.

Background: Bioresorbable vascular scaffolds (BVSs) have been developed as a potential solution to mitigate late complications associated with drug-eluting metallic stents (DESs) in percutaneous coronary intervention for coronary artery disease. While numerous studies have compared BVSs to DESs, none have assessed clinical outcomes beyond 5 years. Objectives: This study aimed to compare the 10-year clinical outcomes of patients treated with BVSs vs. DESs. Methods: The EverBio-2 trial (Comparison of Everolimus- and Biolimus-Eluting Coronary Stents with Everolimus-Eluting Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold) is a single-center, assessor-blinded, randomized controlled trial that enrolled 240 patients allocated in a 1:1:1 ratio to receive BVSs, everolimus-eluting stents, or biolimus-eluting stents (BESs). Clinical follow-up was scheduled for 10 years. Results: Clinical follow-up was completed in 222 patients (93%) at the 10-year mark. The rate of device-oriented composite events (DOCE) was 28% in the DES group and 29% in the BVS group (p = 0.72) at 10 years. Similarly, the rate of patient-oriented composite events (POCE) was 55% in the DES group and 49% in the BVS group (p = 0.43) at 10 years. Notably, the rate of myocardial infarction (MI) within the target vessel was 5% in the BVS group and 0% in the BES group (p = 0.04), while the rate of any MI was 10% in the BVS group and 2% in the BES group (p = 0.04). In addition, the rate of Academic Research Consortium (ARC) possible stent thrombosis was 3% in the BVS group and 0% in the DES group (p = 0.04). Conclusions: Over 10 years, the rates of clinical DOCE and POCE were similar between the BVS and DES groups but individual outcomes of stent thrombosis were higher (3%) in the BVS group compared to the DES group. Clinical Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier (NCT01711931).

A Meta-Analysis of 3-Year Outcomes of Drug-Coated Balloons Versus Drug-Eluting Stents for Small-Vessel Coronary Artery Disease.

Background: Drug-coated balloons (DCBs) may be a viable alternative to drug-eluting stents (DES) for de novo small caliber coronary artery lesions. However, there remains a lack of data regarding the long-term efficacy of this approach. Objectives: The purpose of this study was to compare the rates of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) after 3-year follow-up among patients randomized to DCB versus DES for the treatment of small caliber coronary arteries with reference vessel diameter between 2 and 3 mm. Methods: We systematically searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CENTRAL databases from their inception to July 2023 for randomized controlled trials comparing DCB versus DES for small caliber coronary artery disease. The primary end point was MACE at 3-year follow-up. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool (RoB 2). Pooled risk ratios (RRs) and 95% CIs were estimated using random effects meta-analytic models. Results: Four randomized controlled trials (n = 1,402) were included. In total, 706 patients were randomized to DCB and 696 to DES. Participants were mostly male (74%), with a mean/median age ranging from 60 to 68 years. Pooled data across trials for MACE showed wide CIs, with little indication of DES superiority over DCB (RR: 0.71; 95% CI: 0.36-1.41). Most individual components of MACE were inconclusive. There was a potential signal for a reduction of target vessel thrombosis with DCB compared to DES (RR: 0.25; 95% CI: 0.06-1.08). Conclusions: Although sample sizes are small, 3-year outcomes suggest that DCB may be a reasonable alternative to DES for the treatment of small coronary arteries.