Clinical evaluation of oxaliplatin-loaded drug-eluting callispheres beads transarterial chemoembolization for unresectable or recurrent esophageal carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: A majority of esophageal carcinoma patients are diagnosed at an advanced stage and are no longer suitable for surgical resection. Drug-eluting beads transarterial chemoembolization (DEB-TACE) with oxaliplatin-loaded CalliSpheres beads (CB) have been used for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma and lung cancer, but they have not been reported for the treatment of unresectable or recurrent esophageal carcinoma. METHODS: DEB-TACE was performed on 22 patients with unresectable or recurrent esophageal carcinoma between March 2019 and May 2022. The clinical outcomes, complications, and efficacy were retrospectively recorded and analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 39 sessions of DEB-TACE were performed in 22 patients, with a technical success rate of 92.3% and clinical success rate of 65.0%. No severe complications such as procedure-related death, esophageal rupture or paraplegia were observed. Complete response, partial response, and stable disease were observed in 14.3% (2/14), 42.9% (6/14), and 21.4% (3/14) of patients 6 months after DEB-TACE, respectively. The objective response rates were 62.5%, 42.9% and 57.1% respectively at 1-, 3-, and 6-month after DEB-TACE. Subsequent interventional treatments were administered to 12 patients, including DEB-TACE for hepatic metastasis in 3 (13.6%), esophageal stenting in 5 (22.7%), and airway stent placement in 5 (22.7%). Two patients were lost to follow up. A total of 9 patients died due to tumor progression (n = 5), pneumatic infection (n = 1), and tumor-related massive esophageal hemorrhage (n = 3). The median overall survivals were 13.9 months and 26.5 months from the first session of DEB-TACE and the diagnosis of esophageal carcinoma, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: DEB-TACE with oxaliplatin-loaded CB is suggested as a safe and effective treatment of unresectable or recurrent esophageal carcinoma, and more studies are required to confirm its efficacy and safety.

Drug-eluting beads transarterial chemoembolization combined apatinib/camrelizumab for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma with hepatic arterioportal shunts.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of drug-eluting beads transarterial chemoembolization (D-TACE) combined with apatinib/camrelizumab in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients with hepatic arterioportal shunts (APS). METHODS: From January 2021 to December 2022, consecutive medical records of advanced HCC patients with APS receiving D-TACE combined apatinib/camrelizumab were reviewed for eligibility. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), tumor response, and adverse events (AEs) were assessed. RESULTS: A total of 23 patients were included in this study, and the median follow-up time was 11 months (range, 2-26 months). In this study, 8 patients (34.8%) achieved PR, 13 patients (56.5%) achieved SD, and 2 patients (8.7%) developed PD. The objective response rate and disease controlled rate were 34.8% and 91.3%, respectively. OS and PFS were 11 months and 7 months, respectively. Multivariate analysis indicated that tumor number was an independent prognostic factor affecting PFS. AEs occurred in 19 patients after oral apatinib and in 8 patients after camrelizumab treatment. No treatment-related death occurred. CONCLUSIONS: D-TACE combined with apatinib/camrelizumab had meaningful efficacy and controllable AEs in advanced HCC patients with APS, which may be a promising treatment option. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: •1.We investigate a new treatment strategy for advanced HCC patients with hepatic arterioportal shunts；2.D-TACE combined with apatinib/camrelizumab had meaningful efficacy and controllable AEs in advanced HCC patients with APS, which may be a promising treatment option.

Interruption during drug-eluting beads transarterial chemoembolization procedure by presumed allergic shock requires careful follow-up on the development of vascular lake phenomenon.

We present a case involving a 60-year-old male with multifocal hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), emphasizing the critical need for vigilant post-procedural monitoring following the interruption of drug-eluting beads transarterial chemoembolization (DEB-TACE) due to an allergic reaction. The patient, who had a history of various treatments for HCC, underwent DEB-TACE. During the procedure, he experienced an anaphylactic shock, presumably due to an allergy to the treatment components (iodinated contrast agent), resulting in the procedure's discontinuation. Initially stable, the patient was later found to have intra-abdominal bleeding, a complication associated with the vascular lake phenomenon (VLP), detected on post-procedural imaging. Re-embolization using gelatin particles was performed to address the VLP. It remains unclear whether the shock experienced during the DEB-TACE procedure was due to the allergic reaction or the rupture of the VLP. This case underscores the complexities in managing DEB-TACE, the necessity of careful monitoring for VLP, and the challenges in diagnosing and managing allergic reactions during such procedures. In conclusion, it is crucial to consider that VLP can occur at any time during or after DEB-TACE. Assessing the presence of VLP using digital subtraction angiography before the termination of the procedure is essential. However, when an allergy to the iodinated contrast agent is suspected, as in this case, careful follow-up with abdominal ultrasound and computed tomography might be necessary to assess the presence of intra-abdominal hemorrhage associated with VLP.

Tumor diameter and enhancing capsule, as well as previous interventional treatments, as potential predictors of vascular lake phenomenon in hepatocellular carcinoma patients treated with drug-eluting beads transarterial chemoembolization.

Objectives: The initial drug-eluting bead (DEB)-transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) are often performed after multiple sessions of transarterial infusion chemotherapy (TAI) or conventional TACE. The purpose of our study was to evaluate the factors associated with the occurrence of vascular lake phenomenon (VLP) during DEB-TACE, considering the previous interventional treatments. Material and Methods: Forty-nine initial DEB-TACE procedures in 49 patients between November 2010 and April 2024 were included in this retrospective study. VLP was defined as a localized pooling of contrast agents within the tumor in the venous phase of digital subtraction angiography. The laboratory data, pre-treatment imaging findings such as the maximum tumor diameter (≥3 cm or <3 cm) and the presence of enhancing capsule obtained from computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging, size of DEBs, and loading drugs, the total number of previous interventional treatments were recorded and compared between VLP occurrence and VLP non-occurrence groups. The multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to explore the association of factors in predicting VLP occurrence. Results: VLP was observed in 16 patients (32.65%) out of 49 patients. The maximum tumor diameter (≥3 cm) and the presence of the enhancing capsule were significantly higher, and the total number of previous interventional treatments was significantly smaller in the VLP occurrence group than in the VLP non-occurrence group (P = 0.0006, 0.0007, and 0.0003). In multivariate analysis, the maximum tumor diameter, the presence of the enhancing capsule, and the total number of previous interventional treatments were significantly associated with the occurrence of VLP (P = 0.0048, 0.0093, and 0.047). Conclusion: Our study confirmed that the reported risk factor, the maximum tumor diameter, and the enhancing capsule were significantly related to the occurrence of VLP in DEB-TACE. Further, the occurrence of VLP might be carefully considered when the number of previous interventional treatments is small.

Radiomics analysis based on contrast-enhanced MRI for predicting short-term efficacy of drug-eluting beads transarterial chemoembolization in hepatocellular carcinoma.

OBJECTIVE: We developed and validated a clinical-radiomics model for preoperative prediction of the short-term efficacy of initial drug-eluting beads transarterial chemoembolization (D-TACE) treatment in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study of 113 patients with intermediate and advanced HCC, 5343 features were extracted based on three sequences of the arterial phase (AP), diffusion-weighted imaging, and T2-weighted images based on contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging, and minimum redundancy maximum correlation and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression were applied for feature selection and model construction. Multifactor logistic regression was used to build a clinical-imaging model based on clinical factors and a clinical-radiomics model. The area under the curve (AUC) and calibration curves were used to assess model performance, and the clinical value of the model was analyzed using decision curve analysis. The relationship between the actual and predicted short-term efficacy of the combined model and progression-free survival (PFS) was evaluated using Kaplan-Meier survival curves and log-rank tests. RESULTS: A total of 34 radiomics features were selected by LASSO, and the clinical-radiomics model had the best predictive performance (AUC = 0.902 and AUC = 0.845 for the training and testing sets, respectively), and the model based on AP had the best predictive performance among the four radiomics models (AUC = 0.89 for the training set and AUC = 0.85 for the testing set); the multifactorial logistic regression results showed that microsphere type (p = 0.042) and AP Rad-score (p = 0.01) were associated with short-term efficacy. In addition, a difference in PFS was observed in patients with HCC with different short-term efficacies predicted by the combined model. Moreover, prognosis was better in the objective versus non-objective response group. CONCLUSIONS: The combined clinical-radiomics model is an effective predictor of the short-term efficacy of initial D-TACE in patients with HCC, contributing to clinical and economic benefits for patients.

Drug-eluting beads transcatheter arterial chemoembolization combined with systemic therapy versus systemic therapy alone as first-line treatment for unresectable colorectal liver metastases.

Purpose: The purpose of this retrospective study was to compare the therapeutic efficacy and safety of drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization (DEB-TACE) combined with systemic therapy to systemic therapy alone as first-line treatment for unresectable patients with colorectal liver metastases (CRLM). Methods: From December 2017 to December 2022, patients with unresectable CRLM who received systemic therapy with or without DEB-TACE as first-line treatment were included in the study. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints were tumor response, conversion rate and adverse events. Results: Ninety-eight patients were enrolled in this study, including 46 patients who received systemic therapy combined with DEB-TACE (DEB-TACE group) and 52 patients who received systemic therapy alone (control group). The median PFS was elevated in the DEB-TACE group compared with the control group (12.1 months vs 8.4 months, p = 0.008). The disease control rate was increased in the DEB-TACE group compared with the control group (87.0% vs 67.3%, p = 0.022). Overall response rates (39.1% vs 25.0%; p = 0.133) and conversion rate to liver resection (33.8% vs 25.0%; p = 0.290) were no different between the two groups. The multivariate analysis showed that treatment options, size of liver metastasis, number of liver metastasis, synchronous metastases, and extrahepatic metastases were independent prognostic factor of PFS. Further subgroup analyses illustrated that PFS was beneficial with the DEB-TACE group in patients with age ≥ 60, male, left colon, synchronous metastases, bilobar, number of liver metastasis > 5, extrahepatic metastases, non-extrahepatic metastases, CEA level < 5 (ng/ml), and KRAS wild-type. No grade 4 or 5 toxicities related to DEB-TACE procedures were observed. Conclusion: In patients with unresectable CRLM, systemic chemotherapy with DEB-TACE as first-line treatment may improve progression-free survival and disease control rate outcomes over systemic chemotherapy alone with manageable safety profile.

The Influence of Drug-Eluting Beads Transarterial Chemoembolization on Serum Levels of Soluble Programmed Cell Death Protein-1 in Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients.

Aim: This study aims to explore the role of soluble programmed cell death protein 1 (sPD-1) in individuals with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) undergoing treatment with drug-eluting beads transarterial chemoembolization (D-TACE). Additionally, we aim to assess the potential utility of sPD-1 for determining the optimal timing for combining D-TACE with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Materials and Methods: A total of 44 HCC patients eligible for D-TACE and 55 healthy volunteers were enrolled in this study. Three milliliters of peripheral venous blood from the patients were collected on the day before D-TACE and 3, 7, and 30 days after D-TACE, respectively, for the assay of sPD-1. The relationships between sPD-1 levels, clinical features, outcomes, and the fluctuation of sPD-1 during treatment were analyzed. Results: The initial sPD-1 levels in patients were found to be significantly higher than those in the control group. Although the initial sPD-1 levels displayed a decreasing trend with an increase in BCLC stage, no significant differences were observed among patients at different BCLC stages. The sPD-1 level on day 3 after D-TACE was similar to that on day 7 after D-TACE and significantly lower than the initial level. The sPD-1 level on day 30 after D-TACE was significantly higher than that on day 3 and day 7 after D-TACE and nearly returned to the initial level before D-TACE. Conclusion: The level of sPD-1 was found to be significantly elevated in patients with HCC. However, further research is deemed necessary to fully understand the role of sPD-1 as a potential biomarker in the initiation, progression, and prognosis of HCC. The decrease in sPD-1 following D-TACE suggests that immune effector cells might potentially be reduced, as well as immune function weakened, highlighting the need to avoid the prompt administration of ICIs after D-TACE.

Comparison of Callisphere Drug-Eluting Beads Transarterial Chemoembolization and Conventional Transarterial Chemoembolization for the treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Objective: To compare the efficacy of CalliSphere drug-eluting beads (DEBs) and conventional (c) transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the clinical data of 125 patients with HCC who had received treatment in Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College from January 2018 to February 2019. Sixty-one patients underwent DEB-TACE (observation group) and 64 patients underwent cTACE (control group). The clinical efficacies, overall survivals, and incidence of postoperative adverse reactions between the two groups were compared. Results: The objective response rate in the observation group (85.25%) was higher than that in the control group (70.31%; P<0.05). The disease control in the observation group (96.72%) was higher than that in the control group (85.94%; P<0.05). The median survival time of the observation group (24.85 months) was significantly higher than that in the control group (18.18 months; P<0.05). The incidence of adverse reactions in the observation group (4.92%) was lower than that in the control group (17.19%, P<0.05). Conclusions: In the treatment of HCC, Callisphere DEB-TACE has better efficacy and longer patient survival with fewer adverse reactions compared to cTACE.

Propensity score matching analysis of efficacy of drug-eluting beads (DEB)-TACE loaded with different drugs in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of drug-eluting beads transarterial chemoembolization (DEB-TACE) in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) by propensity score matching (PSM) technique. METHODS: The clinical data of HCC patients treated with DEB-TACE in the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University from June 2017 to June 2020 as well as their 36-month-follow-up data were retrospectively analyzed. The subjects were matched in pairs based on baseline data and laboratory indicators using the PSM method and divided into a pirarubicin group (n = 34), raltitrexed group (n = 34), and arsenic trioxide group (n = 34). Clinical efficacy was evaluated according to mRECIST criteria. The levels of alpha fetal protein (AFP), carcinoma embryonic antigen (CEA) and carbohydrate antigen-125 (CA125) in serum were detected by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). The progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were recorded by outpatient, inpatient, and telephone follow-up. Adverse reactions were counted. RESULTS: After PSM, no significant differences were seen in gender, age, tumor burden, Child-Pugh grade, portal vein tumor thrombus or TACE frequency among the three groups (all P>0.05). The ORR rate of the pirarubicin group and arsenic trioxide group at both 3rd and 6th month post-operation was significantly higher than that of the raltitrexed group (all P<0.05). Before and 1 month after treatment, there were no significant differences in the aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), or total bilirubin (TBIL) levels between the three groups (all P>0.05). Before treatment, no significant differences were observed in AFP, CEA, or CA125 levels among the three groups (all P>0.05). After treatment, the levels of AFP in the pirarubicin group and arsenic trioxide group were lower than those in the raltitrexed group (both P<0.05), but there were no significant differences in CEA and CA125 levels (all P>0.05). There were no significant differences in PFS and OS among the three groups (all P>0.05), and the incidence of fever, abdominal pain, and myelosuppression showed no significant differences among the three groups (all P>0.05). CONCLUSION: The efficacies of DEB-TACE loaded with pirarubicin, raltitrexed, or arsenic trioxide in treating HCC were generally comparable, and the survival benefit of patients was similar. The short-term efficacy of the pirarubicin group and arsenic trioxide group was slightly better than that of the raltitrexed group.

The safety and efficacy of oxaliplatin-loaded drug-eluting beads transarterial chemoembolization for the treatment of unresectable or advanced lung cancer.

Aim: Drug-eluting beads are usually applied for the treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. Oxaliplatin was suggested as first-line therapy for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. However, there has been little investigation about the application of drug-eluting beads transarterial chemoembolization (DEB-TACE) with oxaliplatin-loaded CalliSpheres beads (CB) for the treatment of unresectable or advanced lung cancer. We aimed to investigate the safety and efficacy of oxaliplatin-loaded DEB-TACE for the treatment of unresectable or advanced lung cancer. Methods: From January 2019 to December 2021, all patients with primary unresectable or advanced lung cancer who underwent DEB-TACE with oxaliplatin-loaded CB were retrospectively enrolled. This study defined overall survival and objective response rate (ORR) as the primary endpoints, disease control rate (DCR) and progression-free survival (PFS) as the secondary endpoints. Results: A total of 33 sessions of DEB-TACE were performed in 20 patients, with a mean of 1.7 ± 1.0 sessions. A total of 55 arteries were emoblized by CB, including 40 bronchial arteries, 13 intercostal arteries, one suprarenal artery and one inferior phrenical artery. No procedural-related mortality or severe complications were observed. The median tumor diameter was 49.0 [Interquartile range (IQR) 37.8-66.8] mm before DEB-TACE, and decreased to 38.8 (IQR 27.7-56.9), 26.1 (IQR 19.1-48.8), and 20.5 (IQR 13.1-49.7) mm at 1, 3 and 6 months later (p = 0.04). The ORR and DCR at 1, 3, and 6 months after DEB-TACE were 28.6% and 92.9%, 38.5% and 84.6%, 30.8% and 61.5%, respectively. The median PFS and median overall survival was 9.9 and 29.6 months, respectively. Conclusion: DEB-TACE with oxaliplatin-loaded CB is suggested as a safe, effective and well-tolerated treatment for patients with unresectable or advanced lung cancer.

Clinical outcomes of gemcitabine-loaded callispheres drug-eluting beads for patients with advanced and inoperable lung cancer: A case series study.

Aim: Drug-eluting beads transarterial chemoembolization (DEB-TACE) has not been widely used in patients with advanced and inoperable lung cancer. We aimed to report the preliminary outcomes of DEB-TACE with gemcitabine-loaded CalliSpheres beads for patients with advanced and inoperable lung cancer. Methods: From November 2017 to October 2021, 37 patients (29 males, mean age 64.7 ± 10.3 years) with advanced and inoperable lung cancer underwent DEB-TACE with gemcitabine-loaded CalliSpheres beads. The primary endpoint was overall response rate, and the secondary endpoints were overall survival and progression-free survival. Results: A total of 54 sessions of DEB-TACE were performed in 37 patients, with a technique success rate of 100%. Fourteen patients received a second session of DEB-TACE. The mean follow-up time was 18.7 ± 11.9 months. After 1, 3, and 6 months, overall response rate and disease control rate were 27.8% and 91.7%, 25.8% and 74.2%, 32.1%, and 67.9%, respectively. The median progression-free survival was 8.8 months (95% CI 7.5, 12.5 months). The 3-, 6- and 12- month progression-free survival rates were 67.1%, 57.0%, and 30.1%, respectively. The median overall survival was 10.0 months (95% CI 4.5, 13.1 months). The 3-, 6-, and 12- month overall survival rates were 88.5%, 72.7%, and 40.9%, respectively. Minor complications were observed in 14 patients (37.8%), with no procedure-related deaths or severe adverse events. Conclusion: DEB-TACE with gemcitabine-loaded CalliSpheres beads is a safe, feasible and effective treatment strategy for patients with advanced and inoperable lung cancer.

Oxaliplatin Eluting CalliSpheres Microspheres for the Treatment of Unresectable or Recurrent Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Aim: Drug-eluting beads-transarterial chemoembolization (DEB-TACE) has been widely used in unresectable and advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, no study reported the clinical outcomes of drug-eluting beads TACE (DEB-TACE) with oxaliplatin-eluting CalliSpheres microspheres in the treatment of HCC. This study reports the preliminary outcomes of DEB-TACE loaded with oxaliplatin for the treatment of patients with unresectable or recurrent HCC. Methods: From November 2019 to November 2021, 29 patients with unresectable or recurrent HCC were recruited from our department and treated by DEB-TACE loaded with oxaliplatin. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS), and the secondary endpoints were disease control rate and safety. Tumor response was investigated at 1, 3, and 6 months after DEB-TACE according to the criteria of the response evaluation in solid tumor (RECIST) criteria and the modified RECIST criteria (mRECIST). Survival curve was generated with the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: A total of 49 DEB-TACE sessions were performed, with a technical success rate of 100%. The overall response rate and disease control rate were 52.4 and 95.2%, 64.7 and 76.5%, and 54.5 and 63.3%, respectively, at 1, 3, and 6 months after DEB-TACE (mRECIST). The PFS was 5.9 months, and the median overall survival was 18.8 months. The 6- and 12-month overall survival rate was 82.5% and 67.5%, respectively, No treatment-related mortality or severe adverse events were observed. Minor complications were observed in 21 patients (72.4%), and abdominal pain (41.4%) was the most common treatment-related complication. Conclusion: DEB-TACE loaded with oxaliplatin-eluting CalliSpheres microspheres could be a safe, feasible, and efficacious palliative regimen in unresectable or recurrent HCC patients.

Lenvatinib with or without Concurrent Drug-Eluting Beads Transarterial Chemoembolization in Patients with Unresectable, Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Real-World, Multicenter, Retrospective Study.

Introduction: Lenvatinib is the first-line treatment for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of lenvatinib plus drug-eluting beads transarterial chemoembolization (DEB-TACE) versus lenvatinib alone in real-world practice. Methods: This retrospective analysis included 142 consecutive patients who received lenvatinib plus DEB-TACE and 69 patients who received lenvatinib alone as first-line treatment from 15 Chinese academic centers from November 2018 to November 2019. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR) were evaluated by modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors criteria, and safety profiles were compared between the two groups. Results: The median OS and PFS were significantly longer in the combined therapy group than in the monotherapy group in whole cohort (median OS, 15.9 vs. 8.6 months, p = 0.0022; median PFS, 8.6 vs. 4.4 months, p < 0.001) and after propensity score matching analysis (median OS, 13.8 vs. 7.8 months, p = 0.03; median PFS, 7.8 vs. 4.5 months, p = 0.009). Moreover, the treatment option was an independent prognostic factor for OS and PFS with adjustment based upon baseline characteristics (adjusted hazard ratio [HR]: 0.53, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.36-0.78, p = 0.001, and adjusted HR: 0.42, 95% CI: 0.30-0.60, p < 0.001, respectively) and propensity score (adjusted HR: 0.52, 95% CI: 0.36-0.76, p = 0.001, and adjusted HR: 0.46, 95% CI: 0.33-0.64, p < 0.001, respectively). Moreover, a greater ORR was observed in the combined group (ORR: 46.48% vs. 13.05%, p < 0.001). Furthermore, the most common adverse events (AEs) were elevated aspartate aminotransferase (54.9%) and fatigue (46.4%) in the lenvatinib plus DEB-TACE group and lenvatinib group, respectively. Most AEs were mild-to-moderate and manageable. Conclusions: With well-tolerated safety, lenvatinib plus DEB-TACE was more effective than lenvatinib monotherapy in improving OS, PFS, and ORR. Thus, it may be a promising treatment for advanced HCC. Future prospective studies confirming these findings are warranted.

Callispheres® drug-eluting beads transarterial chemoembolization might be an efficient and safety down-staging therapy in unresectable liver cancer patients.

PURPOSE: The purpose was to explore the effect of drug-eluting beads transarterial chemoembolization (DEB-TACE) on down-staging in unresectable liver cancer patients. METHODS: A total of 180 patients with PHC treated by TACE were retrospectively analyzed. These included 80 cases in the DEB-TACE group and 100 cases in the cTACE group. Of these, 56 had complete clinical data (DEB-TACE: 24, cTACE: 32), and 23 patients received hepatectomy after TACE as a down-staging therapy (DEB-TACE: 15, cTACE: 8). Data (including clinical characteristics, clinical efficacy, tumor response, tumor diameters, residual liver volume, and liver function indexes before and after TACE, RFS, OS, and complications were collected and compared. Treatment response was evaluated at 1 month after TACE. Tumor diameter was evaluated by abdominal computed tomography scan. The residual liver volume was evaluated by IQQA liver system, and relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated by Kaplan-Meier curves. RESULTS: The conversion rate in DEB-TACE group was higher than cTACE group (18.8% vs 8%, p = 0.032). In DEB-TACE group, 17 patients achieved objective response rate (ORR) which was higher than cTACE group (70.8% vs 34.4%, p = 0.007). The tumor necrosis rate was higher in DEB-TACE group, but there was no significant difference between the two groups (p = 0.053). Tumor diameter was decreased after TACE compared to before TACE (DEB-TACE: 9.4 ± 3.3 vs. 5.4 ± 3.5 cm, p = 0.003; cTACE: 9.7 ± 2.6 vs. 6.9 ± 2.2, p = 0.036). As to residual liver volume, it was increased after TACE compared to before TACE (1066.2 cm3 vs. 1180.3 cm3, p = 0.007) in DEB-TACE group, while there was no significant difference in cTACE group (1046.4 cm3 vs. 1170 cm3, p = 0.339) compared by paired-sample t-test, but there was no significant difference before and after TACE when compared by unpaired-sample t-test (p > 0.05). After TACE at 1 month, the AFP level in the DEB-TACE group was significantly lower than that in the cTACE group (p = 0.003). For survival, the median RFS was 26.0 months in DEB-TACE group and 15 months in cTACE group; there was significant difference between the two groups (p = 0.0465). As to OS, the median OS in DEB-TACE group was higher than that in cTACE group, but there was no significant difference between the two groups (p = 0.165). For safety profiles, in terms of liver function and adverse events, there was no significant difference between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Compared with cTACE, DEB-TACE might be a more efficient and safety down-staging treatment in unresectable liver cancer patients.

Intraarterial Therapies for the Management of Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Image-guided locoregional therapies play a crucial role in the management of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Transarterial therapies consist of a group of catheter-based treatments where embolic agents are delivered directly into the tumor via their supplying arteries. Some of the transarterial therapies available include bland embolization (TAE), transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), drug-eluting beads-transarterial chemoembolization (DEB-TACE), selective internal radioembolization therapy (SIRT), and hepatic artery infusion (HAI). This article provides a review of pre-procedural, intra-procedural, and post-procedural aspects of each therapy, along with a review of the literature. Newer embolotherapy options and future directions are also briefly discussed.

A comparative study of efficacy and safety of transarterial chemoembolization with CalliSpheres and conventional transarterial chemoembolization in treating unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma patients.

Objective: Previous studies reported that drug-eluting beads transarterial chemoembolization (DEB-TACE) with CalliSpheres is effective and safe to treat hepatocellular carcinoma patients and metastatic liver cancer patients, however few studies reported its clinical application in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) patients. Therefore, this study aimed to compare the efficacy between DEB-TACE versus conventional transarterial chemoembolization (cTACE) in unresectable ICC patients. Methods: Between January 2016 and June 2020, 89 patients with unresectable ICC were retrospectively analyzed, and enrolled into DEB-TACE group (N=40) and cTACE group (N=49) based on the transarterial treatment. Treatment response was assessed according to modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST). Time to progression (TTP) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed by using the Kaplan-Meier curve. Factors affecting OS and TTP were determined by Cox's proportional hazards regression model. Results: DEB-TACE group showed higher DCR (87.5% vs. 65.3%, P=0.011), while similar ORR (67.5% vs. 57.1%, P=0.317) compared to cTACE group. Furthermore, DEB-TACE group had longer OS (median 10 months vs 6 months, P=0.006), while similar TTP compared to cTACE group (median 4 months vs 2 months, P=0.098). After adjustment by multivariant Cox's regression, DEB-TACE (versus cTACE) independently correlated with longer OS (P=0.031). Further subgroup analyses displayed that OS was prolonged in DEB-TACE group compared to cTACE group in patients with multiple tumors (P=0.032) and patients with no lymph node metastasis (P=0.023). Apart from abdominal pain, no difference of adverse events between the two groups was observed. There was no difference in liver function (Bilirubin, Albumin, Prothrombin time) before and after treatment (4 weeks) in both groups. Conclusion: In patients with unresectable ICC, DEB-TACE significantly improved the OS when compared with cTACE and was well tolerated.

Efficacy of Drug-Eluting Beads Transarterial Chemoembolization Plus Camrelizumab Compared With Conventional Transarterial Chemoembolization Plus Camrelizumab for Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of drug-eluting beads transarterial chemoembolization plus camrelizumab (D-TACE-C) with conventional transarterial chemoembolization plus camrelizumab (C-TACE-C) in the treatment of patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective study that evaluated the consecutive medical records of patients with unresectable HCC who had undergone D-TACE-C or C-TACE-C from April 2020 to August 2021. Efficacy of treatment was evaluated using tumor response, progression-free survival (PFS) and survival rates. The adverse events were recorded. RESULTS: A total of 54 patients were included in this study, including 27 patients who had received D-TACE-C treatment, and 27 patients who had received C-TACE-C treatment. The median PFS and DCR in the D-TACE-C group were significantly longer than those for the C-TACE-C group (PFS: 10 vs. 3 months, P=.017; DCR: 70.4% vs. 40.7%, P = .028). Cox regression analysis showed that D-TACE-C was the only protective factor for PFS. The 6-month and 12-month survival rates in D-TACE-C group and C-TACE-C group were 85.2% versus 79.4% (P = .646) and 65.2% versus 65.1% (P = .903), respectively. Reactive cutaneous capillary endothelial proliferation was the most common adverse event associated with the treatment. There was no significant difference in the adverse events related to TACE and camrelizumab between the two groups. No treatment-related deaths occurred in this study. CONCLUSIONS: D-TACE-C is a safe and well-tolerated treatment, and may produce better PFS and tumor response in patients with unresectable HCC than C-TACE-C.

Efficacy, safety, and prognostic factors of drug-eluting beads transarterial chemoembolization using CalliSpheres in treating huge hepatocellular carcinoma patients.

BACKGROUND: The treatment of huge hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is still challengeable due to its deteriorative heterogeneity, for which conventional transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) is proposed as an efficient therapy; however, drug-eluting beads TACE (DEB-TACE) is rarely reported in these patients. Thus, the current study aimed to explore the efficacy, prognostic factors, and safety of DEB-TACE using CalliSpheres in huge HCC patients. METHODS: Ninety-nine huge HCC patients treated by DEB-TACE using CalliSpheres were retrospectively reviewed. Treatment response, change of tumor markers, liver function indexes, progression-free survival (PFS), and adverse events were retrieved. RESULTS: Objective response rate (ORR) was 66.1%, 48.6%, and 23.8%, then disease control rate (DCR) was 85.5%, 67.6%, and 33.3% at month (M) 1, M3, and M6, respectively; furthermore, carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) (p = 0.037), alpha fetoprotein (AFP) (p < 0.001), and protein induced by vitamin K absence or antagonist-II (PIVKA-II) (p < 0.001) were all declined at 1 month after DEB-TACE. The median PFS was 8.3 (95% confidence interval: 6.0-10.6) months with 1-year and 2-year PFS rates of 38.5% and 15.5%, accordingly. Moreover, elevated China liver cancer (CNLC) stage (p = 0.036, hazard ratio (HR): 1.937) and abnormal cancer antigen 199 (p = 0.019, HR: 2.465) were correlated with unfavorable PFS. Besides, liver function indexes were not deteriorated after DEB-TACE. Lastly, main adverse events included pain (20.2%), fever (17.2%), nausea (14.1%), and vomit (9.1%), which were mild and manageable. CONCLUSION: DEB-TACE using CalliSpheres presents satisfying efficacy and tolerable safety in huge HCC patients, suggesting that it might be a good treatment option for these patients.

Treatment response, survival and safety profile of transarterial chemoembolization using different sizes of drug-eluting beads in hepatocellular carcinoma patients with portal vein tumor thrombus.

BACKGROUND: Different sized microspheres may affect the efficacy and safety of drug-eluting beads transarterial chemoembolization (DEB-TACE) in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients with portal vein tumor thrombus (PVTT), but related data are lacking. Therefore, the current study aimed to investigate the treatment response, survival and safety of DEB-TACE using different sized microspheres in HCC patients with or without PVTT. METHODS: Totally 90 HCC patients underwent DEB-TACE treatment were retrospectively enrolled (30 cases with PVTT and 60 cases without PVTT). According to the sizes of microspheres, patients were divided into 100-300 µm, 300-500 µm and 500-700 µm groups, respectively. RESULTS: Disease control rate (DCR) was highest in 300-500 µm group (81.3%), followed by 500-700 µm group (50.0%), then the lowest in 100-300 µm group (12.5%) (P = 0.004); while objective response rate (ORR) was similar among three groups (P = 0.177) in patients with PVTT. Furthermore, overall survival (OS) (P = 0.513) and adverse events (all P>0.05) were similar among three groups in patients with PVTT. Besides, in patients without PVTT: ORR (P = 0.694), DCR (P = 0.591), OS (P = 0.816) were of no difference among three groups; but the fever incidence was highest in 300-500 µm group (65.0%), second high in 500-700 µm group (50.0%), then lowest in 100-300 µm group (25.0%) (P = 0.008), except for this, no difference of other adverse events among three groups was found (all P>0.05). CONCLUSION: DEB-TACE using 300-500 µm microspheres (versus 100-300 µm or 500-700 µm microspheres) exhibits best treatment response without additional adverse events, indicating it might be the optimal choice for HCC patients with PVTT.