RESUMO
Clarifying the matching degree and the trade-offs and synergies between supply and demand of ecosystem services is of significance for scientific division of management zoning and sustainable urban development. We calculated the supply and demand of ecosystem services at the sub-district (town) scale of Taiyuan based on multi-source data, explored the coldspots and hotspots area of the supply-demand ratio and the trade-offs and synergies of six ecosystem services using the Getis-Ord Gi* tool and correlation analysis, and proposed strategies based on the regional characteristics of natural-resource and socio-economy. Results showed the distribution of the supply and demand of ecosystem services had a spatial heterogeneity. In terms of supply, the area with high supply of carbon storage, air purification, thermal environment regulation and recreation service were located in the east and west parts, that of soil conservation in the west and water yield in the south part. In terms of demand, the demand distribution of carbon storage, thermal environment regulation, water yield and recreation service were characterized by high in the central and east-south area, and low in the periphery, and high demand of air purification in south and north parts, soil conservation in west part. There were substantial mismatches between the demand and supply of ecosystem services. The risk levels of the supply and demand of six ecosystem services showed a decreasing pattern from the Fenhe River to the eastern and western mountains. There were trade-offs between water yield and other five ecosystem services in their supply, while air purification and soil conservation had trade-offs with other four ecosystem services in demand. Based on the regional ecological management framework, we divided the study area into three primary zones and eight secondary zones, and proposed differentiated ecological management strategies to provide theoretical support for ecological zoning. The results could provide a basis for balancing the relationship of supply and demand of ecosystem services and promoting the sustainable development of the city.
Assuntos
Cidades , Conservação dos Recursos Naturais , Ecossistema , China , Ecologia , Monitoramento AmbientalRESUMO
As an important basis for the optimization of territorial space, ecological management zoning is of great significance for maintaining regional ecological security and promoting the construction of ecological civilization. With 10 ecosystem services, such as wind break and sand fixation, water conservation, and forest and grass supply, we built a supply index system for Xinjiang. Modelling and ecological economics methods were used to quantify ecosystem service supply. Ecosystem service demand of Xinjiang in 2020 was quantitatively assessed by combining land use intensity, population, and economic status. Based on the ecosystem service supply-demand ratio model and quadrant matching method, we explored the matching relationship and spatial differentiation of ecosystem ser-vice supply and demands on the 1 km grid scale. The breaking point formula and field intensity formula were used to evaluate the flow range and intensity of ecosystem services, and then ecological management zones were divided and corresponding control measures were proposed. The results showed obvious spatial differences in the supply and demand of ecosystem services in Xinjiang in 2020. The high-supply areas were mainly distributed in river valleys and along river systems, while the demand was concentrated in oasis-central cities. The overall supply of ecosystem services was less than the demand. The spatial distribution was dominated by low supply-low demand areas and high supply-high demand areas. There were seven output zones of ecosystem services in Xinjiang, namely Fuyun County, Fuhai County, Yizhou District, Shanshan County, Alashankou City, Keping County and Qira County. The rests were input zones. According to the comprehensive analysis, Xinjiang could be divided into five ecological management areas, i.e., mountain ecological barrier area, oasis ecological restoration area, desert ecological improvement area, desert-oasis ecological protection area, and patch ecological transport area.