RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Gastrojejunostomy junction perforation is a rare yet critical complication associated with enteral tube placement, presenting unique challenges in patients with a history of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery. CASE PRESENTATION: A 63-year-old white female with a complex medical history, including heart failure, atrial fibrillation, stage 4 chronic kidney disease, and prior Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery in 2015, experienced a significant decline in her health. She was discharged to a skilled nursing facility after a fall but deteriorated rapidly in the 2 weeks before admission. She presented with symptoms of failure to thrive, abdominal/back pain, inability to eat or drink, constipation, and stool incontinence. Lab tests showed anemia, electrolyte imbalances, and acute kidney injury. Imaging confirmed Roux-en-Y gastric bypass anatomy and a small hiatal hernia. Despite treatment attempts, her condition worsened. Nutrition discussions led to a temporary Dobhoff tube placement, considering her Roux-en-Y gastric bypass history, with plans for a gastrostomy tube. However, Dobhoff tube placement posed challenges, and imaging later revealed perforation near the gastrojejunostomy junction. After consulting with the family, the decision was made to transition the patient to comfort care due to her overall condition. Yearly education of staff about Roux-en-Y gastric bypass anatomy and updated Dobhoff placement protocol was implemented with physician oversight. Further imaging protocol in a patient who had had a Roux-en-Y gastric bypass was updated to include fluoroscopic guidance when endoscopic placement was unavailable. CONCLUSIONS: This case highlights the intricacies of managing patients with Roux-en-Y gastric bypass history and underscores the need for meticulous planning and consideration of anatomical variations when performing procedures involving the gastrointestinal tract and the importance of involving multiple healthcare disciplines in complex decision-making and preventive measures to enhance patient safety in similar cases.
Assuntos
Derivação Gástrica , Humanos , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Derivação Gástrica/efeitos adversos , Nutrição Enteral , Intubação Gastrointestinal/efeitos adversos , Gastrostomia/efeitos adversos , Perfuração Intestinal/etiologia , Perfuração Intestinal/cirurgia , Complicações Pós-OperatóriasRESUMO
Bouveret syndrome is one of the complications of gallstone disease possibly fatal, which proposes the presence of a large stone obliterating the lumen of the duodenum or stomach because of the formation of a bilioenteric fistula. This review article, therefore, plans to review the causes, patient characteristics, diagnostic workup, associated conditions, and treatment of Bouveret syndrome. A literature search was also performed through scientific databases such as Scopus, Google Scholar, and PubMed concerning articles related to Bouveret syndrome written by different authors. The terms employed for the search were bilioduodenal fistula, Bouveret syndrome, gastric outlet obstruction, and gallstone ileus. Both case reports and systematic reviews that were written in the English language and published between the years 2000 and 2024 were considered. Finally, the review establishes the relevant concerns surrounding the diagnosis of Bouveret syndrome, focusing on the diagnosing issues. It emphasises the need for some specialities' involvement and focuses on the importance of endoscopic intervention. For patients, endoscopy remains the first line of treatment, while surgery is necessary in cases where conservative methods cannot be used. The article also focuses on new approaches to treating the conditions, such as percutaneous gallbladder stone dissolution. Latterly, further developments in minimally invasive surgery pertain to refining methods, including endoscopic removal and lithotripsy, to improve the survival rate of patients. Further investigation is required, especially regarding the administration schedule in relation to this disorder and goals that can reduce mortality and morbidity, especially in elderly patients with comorbid diseases.
RESUMO
Bronchoesophageal fistula (BEF) is a rare, yet clinically significant, condition characterized by an abnormal connection between the bronchial tree and the esophagus. We present the case of a 25-year-old female who initially presented with symptoms of aspiration pneumonitis and was subsequently diagnosed with BEF, attributed to poorly differentiated squamous cell carcinoma. Despite initial attempts at palliative intervention through esophageal stent placement, persistent symptoms prompted further investigation, revealing the underlying malignancy. This case underscores the diagnostic challenges associated with BEF, particularly when malignancy is involved, and emphasizes the importance of a multidisciplinary approach in optimizing patient outcomes. Early recognition, thorough evaluation, and comprehensive oncological management are essential in addressing the clinical complexities posed by BEF. Further research is warranted to better understand the pathophysiology and optimal management strategies for this rare but clinically significant condition.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Viral infections are known to impact the pancreato-biliary system; however, there are limited data showing that the same is true of COVID-19. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) can safely be performed in patients with COVID-19 infection, but outcomes of patients with COVID-19 infections and concomitant pancreatic and biliary disease requiring endoscopic intervention are unknown. AIMS: This study aims to evaluate the severity of pancreaticobiliary diseases and post-ERCP outcomes in COVID-19 patients. METHODS: Patients with pancreato-biliary disease that required inpatient ERCP from five centers in the United States and South America between January 1, 2020, and October 31, 2020 were included. A representative cohort of patients from each month were randomly selected from each site. Disease severity and post-ERCP outcomes were compared between COVID-19 positive and COVID-19 negative patients. RESULTS: A total of 175 patients were included: 95 COVID positive and 80 COVID negative. Mean CTSI score for the patients who had pancreatitis was higher in COVID-positive cohort by 3.2 points (p < .00001). The COVID-positive group had more cases with severe disease (n = 41) versus the COVID-negative group (n = 2) (p < .00001). Mortality was higher in the COVID-19 positive group (19%) compared to COVID-negative group (7.5%) even though the COVID-19-negative group had higher incidence of malignancy (n = 17, 21% vs n = 7, 7.3%) (p = 0.0455). CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that patients with COVID infection have more severe pancreato-biliary disease and worse post-ERCP outcomes, including longer length of stay and higher mortality rate. These are important considerations when planning for endoscopic intervention. CLINICALTRIALS: gov: (NCT05051358).
Assuntos
Doenças Biliares , COVID-19 , Colangiopancreatografia Retrógrada Endoscópica , Pancreatopatias , Humanos , COVID-19/complicações , COVID-19/mortalidade , COVID-19/terapia , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Masculino , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Doenças Biliares/epidemiologia , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Estudos Retrospectivos , SARS-CoV-2 , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: A considerable number of patients with nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) need endoscopic intervention. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine factors that predict the need for endoscopic intervention at the time of admission to the emergency department. METHODS: Consecutive patients with International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision diagnosis code K92.2 (gastrointestinal hemorrhage) who underwent upper endoscopy between February 2019 and February 2022, including patients diagnosed with nonvariceal UGIB in the emergency department in the study were reviewed retrospectively. The patients were divided into two groups: those treated endoscopically and those not treated endoscopically. These two groups were compared according to clinical and laboratory findings at admission and independent predictors for endoscopic intervention were determined using multivariate regression analysis. RESULTS: Although 123 patients (30.3%) were treated endoscopically, endoscopic treatment was not required in 283 (69.7%) patients. Syncope, mean arterial pressure (MAP), and blood urea nitrogen (BUN) at admission were independent predictors for endoscopic intervention in the multivariate analysis, after adjusting for endoscopy time. The area under the curve of the syncope+MAP+BUN combination for endoscopic intervention was 0.648 (95% CI 0.588-0.708). Although the syncope+MAP+BUN combination predicted the need for intervention significantly better than pre-endoscopy Rockall and AIMS65 scores (p = 0.010 and p < 0.001, respectively), there was no significant difference in its comparison with the Glasgow-Blatchford score (p = 0.103). CONCLUSIONS: Syncope, MAP, and BUN at admission were independent predictors for endoscopic therapy in patients with nonvariceal UGIB. Rather than using complicated scores, it would be more practical and easier to predict the need for endoscopic intervention with these three simple parameters, which are included in the Glasgow-Blatchford score.
Assuntos
Endoscopia Gastrointestinal , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Medição de Risco , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/diagnóstico , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/cirurgia , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Síncope/complicações , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , PrognósticoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Rebleeding after hemostasis of the gastroduodenal ulcer (GDU) is one of the indicators associated with death among GDU patients. However, there are few studies on risk score that contribute to rebleeding after endoscopic hemostasis of bleeding peptic ulcers. AIMS: The aim of this study was to identify factors associated with rebleeding, including patient factors, after endoscopic hemostasis of bleeding gastroduodenal ulcers and to stratify the risk of rebleeding. METHODS: We retrospectively enrolled 587 consecutive patients who were treated for Forrest Ia to IIa bleeding gastroduodenal ulcers with endoscopic hemostasis at three institutions. Risk factors associated with rebleeding were assessed using univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses. The Rebleeding Nagoya University (Rebleeding-N) scoring system was developed based on the extracted factors. The Rebleeding-N score was internally validated using bootstrap resampling methods. RESULTS: Sixty-four patients (11%) had rebleeding after hemostasis of gastroduodenal ulcers. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed four independent rebleeding risk factors: blood transfusion, albumin <2.5, duodenal ulcer, and diameter of the exposed vessel â§2 mm. Patients with 4 risk factors in the Rebleeding-N score had a 54% rebleeding rate, and patients with 3 risk factors had 44% and 25% rebleeding rates. In the internal validation, the mean area under the curve of the Rebleeding-N score was 0.830 (95% CI = 0.786-0.870). CONCLUSIONS: Rebleeding after clip hemostasis of bleeding gastroduodenal ulcers was associated with blood transfusion, albumin <2.5, diameter of the exposed vessel â§2 mm, and duodenal ulcer. The Rebleeding-N score was able to stratify the risk of rebleeding.
Assuntos
Úlcera Duodenal , Úlcera Péptica , Humanos , Úlcera Duodenal/terapia , Úlcera Péptica Hemorrágica/terapia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Recidiva , AlbuminasRESUMO
BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Afferent loop syndrome (ALS) is a rare adverse event after gastrointestinal surgery requiring appropriate early decompression treatment. Several endoscopic interventions have been attempted for treatment, including endoscopic enteral metal stent placement (EMSP), endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided entero-enterostomy (EUS-EE), and EUS-guided hepaticogastrostomy (EUS-HGS). However, there are limited data on outcomes, including duration of stent patency. In this study, we evaluated the usefulness of each endoscopic intervention for malignant ALS. METHODS: We retrospectively investigated nine patients with malignant ALS who underwent EMSP, EUS-EE, or EUS-HGS. Information on technical success, clinical efficacy, adverse events, stent dysfunction, and overall survival was collected and analyzed. RESULTS: The most common symptoms were abdominal pain and cholangitis. ALS was treated by EMSP in three patients, EUS-EE in three patients, and EUS-HGS in three patients. Stent placement was successful and clinically effective in all patients with no adverse events. During follow-up, stent dysfunction occurred in two patients treated by EUS-HGS. Eight patients died of primary disease during a median follow-up of 157 days. CONCLUSIONS: Each of the available endoscopic interventions for malignant ALS can be expected to produce similar outcomes, including duration of stent patency. The choice of endoscopic intervention should be made based on the characteristics of each treatment.
Assuntos
Síndrome da Alça Aferente , Colestase , Humanos , Síndrome da Alça Aferente/diagnóstico por imagem , Síndrome da Alça Aferente/etiologia , Síndrome da Alça Aferente/cirurgia , Colestase/etiologia , Drenagem , Endoscopia , Endossonografia , Fígado/patologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Stents/efeitos adversos , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) stands as an accurate imaging modality for esophageal cancer staging, however utilization of EUS in early-stage cancer management remains controversial. Identification of non-applicability of endoscopic interventions with deep muscular invasion with EUS in pre-intervention evaluation of early-stage esophageal cancer is compared to endoscopic and histologic indicators. AIM: To display the role of EUS in pre-intervention early esophageal cancer staging and how the index endoscopic features of invasive esophageal malignancy compare for prediction of depth of invasion and cancer management. METHODS: This was a retrospective study of patients who underwent pre-resection EUS after a diagnosis of esophageal cancer at a tertiary medical center from 2012 to 2022. Patient clinical data, initial esophagogastroduodenoscopy/biopsy, EUS, and final resection pathology reports were abstracted, and statistical analysis was conducted to assess the role of EUS in management decisions. RESULTS: Forty nine patients were identified for this study. EUS T stage was concordant with histological T stage in 75.5% of patients. In determining submucosal involvement (T1a vs T1b), EUS had a specificity of 85.0%, sensitivity of 53.9%, and accuracy of 72.7%. Endoscopic features of tumor size > 2 cm and the presence of esophageal ulceration were significantly associated with deep invasion of cancer on histology. EUS affected management from endoscopic mucosal resection/submucosal dissection to esophagectomy in 23.5% of patients without esophageal ulceration and 6.9% of patients with tumor size < 2 cm. In patients without both endoscopic findings, EUS identified deeper cancer and changed management in 4.8% (1/20) of cases. CONCLUSION: EUS was reasonably specific in ruling out submucosal invasion but had relatively poor sensitivity. Data validated endoscopic indicators suggested superficial cancers in the group with a tumor size < 2 cm and the lack of esophageal ulceration. In patients with these findings, EUS rarely identified a deep cancer that warranted a change in management.
RESUMO
Hemobilia is an unusual type of gastrointestinal bleeding most frequently due to iatrogenic injury, trauma, or neoplasia. Acute cholecystitis as a cause of hemobilia is rare. We present the case study of a patient with bleeding from eroded gallbladder mucosa in the setting of severe calculous cholecystitis. The hemorrhagic episode was preceded by acute ERCP due to obstructive icterus with extraction of the calculi, followed by the development of severe acute pancreatitis. These factors initially misled the diagnosis. The bleeding was not hemodynamically important and routine diagnostic methods did not reveal its exact source. Direct choledochoscopy (SpyGlassTM) proved to be helpful in determining the right diagnosis, as it ruled out any injury or tumor in the main bile ducts and considerably supported the assumption of intrabladder bleeding. Surgical revision confirmed the cause, and subsequent cholecystectomy solved the whole problem.
Assuntos
Colecistite Aguda , Colecistite , Hemobilia , Pancreatite , Humanos , Hemobilia/complicações , Hemobilia/diagnóstico , Doença Aguda , Pancreatite/complicações , Colecistite/complicações , Colecistite/cirurgia , Colecistite Aguda/diagnóstico , Colecistite Aguda/diagnóstico por imagem , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/etiologiaRESUMO
Several pancreatitis-related genetic variants have been identified. Recently, the association of loss-of-function variants in the transient receptor potential cation channel subfamily V member 6 (TRPV6) gene and early-onset non-alcoholic chronic pancreatitis (CP) has been reported. However, detailed clinical presentation of the cases carrying TRPV6 variants remains largely unknown. We report a case of early CP carrying a TRPV6 variant in which recurrent attacks of pancreatitis were successfully managed by pancreatic duct stenting. A 12-year-old boy with CP was referred to our hospital for further investigation. He had experienced recurrent pancreatitis attacks since he was 11 years old. Pancreatic ductal anomalies were not identified on magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography. Genetic analysis revealed that the patient had a loss-of-function TRPV6 c.1448G > A (p.R483Q) variant in a heterozygous form. Conservative treatments were not effective; thus, we placed pancreatic duct stent by endoscopic intervention, and the frequency of relapses have dramatically decreased. We present the first pediatric report of early CP associated with the TRPV6 variant that was successfully treated with pancreatic duct stenting. This case suggests that pancreatic duct stenting is effective in preventing the relapse of pancreatitis related to the TRPV6 variant.
Assuntos
Pancreatite Crônica , Masculino , Humanos , Criança , Pancreatite Crônica/complicações , Pancreatite Crônica/genética , Pancreatite Crônica/cirurgia , Ductos Pancreáticos/patologia , Pâncreas/patologia , Stents , Colangiopancreatografia Retrógrada Endoscópica , Canais de Cálcio/genética , Canais de Cátion TRPV/genéticaRESUMO
PURPOSE: Granulation tissue-induced tracheal stenosis (mainly secondary to intubation or lung transplantation) is one of the most common etiologies of benign airway obstructions. Recurrence rates after standard treatment options (surgical resection and/or endobronchial interventions) can inadvertently worsen the stricture through the stimulation of more granulation tissue generation (via increased fibroblast activity and roliferation). Low-dose radiotherapy could be a promising tool to prevent granulation tissue formation after surgery and/or endobronchial interventions regarding its established role in the treatment of keloids or hypertrophic scars, two benign diseases with similar a pathophysiology to tracheal stenosis. This study reviews case reports and small series that used endobronchial brachytherapy (EBBT) or external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) for the management of refractory granulation tissue-induced tracheal stenosis after surgery and/or endobronchial interventions. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Case reports and series (published up to October 2022) that reported outcomes of patients with recurrent granulation tissue-induced tracheal stenosis (after surgery and/or endobronchial interventions) treated by EBBT or EBRT (in definitive or prophylactic settings) were eligible. RESULTS: Sixteen studies (EBBT: nine studies including 69 patients, EBRT: seven studies including 32 patients) were reviewed. The pooled success rate across all studies was 74% and 97% for EBBT and EBRT, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Radiation therapy appears to be effective in the management of selected patients with recurrent/refractory tracheal stenosis. Response to this treatment is usually good, but further studies with a larger number of patients and long-term followup are necessary to determine the optimal technique, dose, and timing of radiation therapy, late complications, the durability of response, and criteria for patient selection.
Assuntos
Obstrução das Vias Respiratórias , Braquiterapia , Estenose Traqueal , Humanos , Braquiterapia/métodos , Estenose Traqueal/prevenção & controle , Estenose Traqueal/complicações , Tecido de Granulação/efeitos da radiação , Obstrução das Vias Respiratórias/etiologia , Obstrução das Vias Respiratórias/radioterapiaRESUMO
Introduction: Congenital partial duodenal obstruction (CPDO) is a rare type of intestinal obstruction, including webs and stenoses. Treatment has usually been operative by laparoscopy or laparotomy. Some have proposed endoscopic treatment due to a higher surgical risk in patients with CPDO. However, restenosis seems to be frequent after simple balloon dilatation. Material and Methods: We report on a patient with CPDO and complex esophageal atresia in whom we used a gastrojejunal tube to keep the lumen open after endoscopic balloon dilatation over a guidewire. Results: Follow-up endoscopy showed no evidence of restenosis. During the third endoscopy, the opening could be dilated to 15 mm without any complications and the gastrojejunal tube was removed. Since then, there were no clinical signs of obstruction, and no further endoscopic intervention was necessary. Discussion and Conclusion: Using a gastrojejunal tube after endoscopic balloon dilatation of a duodenal web may lower the risk of restenosis. This technique should be considered in patients with comorbidities and considerable surgical risk that have a gastrostomy in place.
Assuntos
Obstrução Duodenal , Atresia Esofágica , Laparoscopia , Humanos , Lactente , Atresia Esofágica/cirurgia , Obstrução Duodenal/etiologia , Obstrução Duodenal/cirurgia , Cateterismo/métodos , Dilatação , Constrição Patológica/cirurgiaRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: Although black stools are one of the signs of upper gastrointestinal bleeding, not all patients without hematemesis need endoscopic intervention. There is no apparent indicator to select who needs treatment thus far. The aim of this study was to establish a novel score that predicts the need for endoscopic intervention in patients with black stools without hematemesis. METHODS: We retrospectively enrolled 721 consecutive patients with black stools without hematemesis who underwent emergency endoscopy from two facilities. In the development stage (from January 2016 to December 2018), risk factors that predict the need for endoscopic intervention were determined from the data of 422 patients by multivariate logistic regression analysis, and a novel scoring system, named the modified Nagoya University score (modified N score), was developed. In the validation stage (from January 2019 to September 2020), we evaluated the diagnostic value of the modified N score for 299 patients. RESULTS: Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed four predictive factors for endoscopic intervention: syncope, the blood urea nitrogen (BUN) level, and the BUN/creatinine ratio as positive indicators and anticoagulant drug use as a negative indicator. In the validation stage, the area under the curve of the modified N score was 0.731, and the modified N score showed a sensitivity of 82.0% and a specificity of 58.8%. CONCLUSIONS: Our modified N score, which consists of only four factors, can identify patients who need endoscopic intervention among those with black stools without hematemesis.
Assuntos
Hematemese , Melena , Endoscopia Gastrointestinal , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/diagnóstico , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/etiologia , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/cirurgia , Hematemese/diagnóstico , Hematemese/etiologia , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Medição de RiscoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: In preparing the Japanese (JPN) guidelines for the management of acute pancreatitis 2021, the committee focused the issues raised by the results of nationwide epidemiological survey in 2016 in Japan. METHOD: In addition to a systematic search using the previous JPN guidelines, papers published from January 2014 to September 2019 were searched for the contents to be covered by the guidelines based on the concept of GRADE system. RESULTS: Thirty-six clinical questions (CQ) were prepared in 15 subject areas. Based on the facts that patients diagnosed with severe disease by both Japanese prognostic factor score and contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) grade had a high fatality rate and that little prognosis improvement after 2 weeks of disease onset was not obtained, we emphasized the importance of Pancreatitis Bundles, which were shown to be effective in improving prognosis, and the CQ sections for local pancreatic complications had been expanded to ensure adoption of a step-up approach. Furthermore, on the facts that enteral nutrition for severe acute pancreatitis was not started early within 48 h of admission and that unnecessary prophylactic antibiotics was used in almost all cases, we emphasized early enteral nutrition in small amounts even if gastric feeding is used and no prophylactic antibiotics are administered in mild pancreatitis. CONCLUSION: All the members of the committee have put a lot of effort into preparing the extensively revised guidelines in the hope that more people will have a common understanding and that better medical care will be spread.
Assuntos
Pancreatite , Humanos , Doença Aguda , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Nutrição Enteral , Pâncreas , Pancreatite/terapia , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios XRESUMO
Various scoring systems have been developed to predict the need for endoscopic treatment in patients with non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding (NVUGIB). However, they have rarely been applied in clinical practice because the processes are complicated. The aim of this study was to establish a simple scoring system that predicts the need for endoscopic intervention in patients with NVUGIB. We retrospectively enrolled 509 consecutive patients with suspected NVUGIB who underwent emergency endoscopy. In the development cohort (from January 2016 to December 2018), risk factors that predict the need for endoscopic intervention were determined from 349 patients' data by multivariate logistic regression analysis. This led to the development of a novel scoring system named the Nagoya University score (N score). In the validation cohort (from January 2019 to September 2020), we evaluated the diagnostic value of the N score, the Hirosaki score, and the Glasgow-Blatchford scores (GBS) by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves using another 160 patients' data. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed syncope, hematemesis, blood urea nitrogen (BUN), and BUN/Cr as significant predictive factors for endoscopic intervention. In the validation study, the N score was superior to the GBS and equal to the Hirosaki score in predicting the endoscopic intervention (AUC, N score 0.776 [95% CI 0.702-0.851] vs. GBS 0.615 [0.523-0.708], Hirosaki 0.719 [0.636-0.803]). The N score revealed a sensitivity of 84.5% and a specificity of 61.8%. Our N score, which is consisted of only four factors, would select patients who require endoscopic intervention with high probability.
Assuntos
Endoscopia Gastrointestinal , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/diagnóstico , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/terapia , Humanos , Prognóstico , Curva ROC , Estudos Retrospectivos , Medição de Risco , Índice de Gravidade de DoençaRESUMO
Background Lower gastrointestinal bleeding (LGIB) is common in inpatient and outpatient settings; however, there are limited studies on the clinical characteristics and patient outcomes of those with hospital-acquired LGIB. Methods We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients with hospital-acquired LGIB who underwent colonoscopy during hospitalization between January 2017 and December 2021. We described the clinical characteristics, etiology, and clinical outcomes of patients stratified as those undergoing colonoscopy within 24 hours from haematochezia onset (early colonoscopy group) or after 24 hours from onset (late colonoscopy group). We used multivariable logistic regression to identify factors associated with endoscopic intervention in the early and late colonoscopy groups. Results Of the 272 patients included, the median age was 79 years (interquartile range: 72-85 years), 153 (56%) were bedridden, and 172 (63%) had hypoalbuminemia. The most frequent etiology was rectal ulcer (101 cases, 37%), whereas 7 (2.6%) had diverticular bleeding. The endoscopic intervention was performed on 16.7% and 7.9% of early and late colonoscopy patients. There were more patients with both non-severe and severe rebleeding in the early colonoscopy group (16% and 12%, respectively) than in the late colonoscopy group (11% and 6.5%, respectively). Colonoscopy-on-worktime was the only factor independently associated with a higher occurrence of endoscopic intervention. Conclusions In our sample, very old patients with hospital-acquired LGIB required endoscopy mainly due to rectal ulcers. Further studies will be necessary to investigate the differences between community-acquired LGIB and hospital-acquired LGIB and the optimal timing of colonoscopy for these patients.
RESUMO
Biliary complications are often referred to as the Achilles' heel of liver transplantation (LT). The most common of these complications include strictures, and leaks. Prompt diagnosis and management is key for preservation of the transplanted organ. Unfortunately, a number of factors can lead to delays in diagnosis and make adequate treatment a challenge. Innovations in advanced endoscopic techniques have increased non-surgical options for these complications and in many cases is the preferred approach.