Clinical, radiological and histopathological features of patients with familial pulmonary fibrosis.

BACKGROUND: In familial pulmonary fibrosis (FPF) at least two biological relatives are affected. Patients with FPF have diverse clinical features. RESEARCH QUESTION: We aimed to characterize demographic and clinical features, re-evaluate high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) scans and histopathology of surgical lung biopsies, assess survival and investigate the suitability of risk prediction models for FPF patients. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study. METHODS: FPF data (n = 68) were collected from the medical records of Oulu University Hospital (OUH) and Oulaskangas District Hospital between 1 Jan 2000 and 11 Jan 2023. The inclusion criterion was pulmonary fibrosis (PF) (ICD 10-code J84.X) and at least one self-reported relative with PF. Clinical information was gathered from hospital medical records. HRCT scans and histology were re-evaluated. RESULTS: Thirty-seven (54.4%) of the patients were men, and 31 (45.6%) were women. The mean ages of the women and men were 68.6 and 61.7 years, respectively (p = 0.003). Thirty-seven (54.4%) patients were nonsmokers. The most common radiological patterns were usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) (51/75.0%), unclassifiable (8/11.8%) and nonspecific interstitial pneumonia (NSIP) (3/4.4%). Pleuroparenchymal fibroelastosis (PPFE) was observed as a single or combined pattern in 13.2% of the patients. According to the 2022 guidelines for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), the patients were categorized as UIP (31/45.6%), probable UIP (20/29.4%), indeterminate for UIP (7/10.3%) or alternative diagnosis (10/14.7%). The histopathological patterns were UIP (7/41.2%), probable UIP (1/5.9%), indeterminate for UIP (8/47.2%) and alternative diagnosis (1/5.9%). Rare genetic variants were found in 9 patients; these included telomerase reverse transcriptase (TERT, n = 6), telomerase RNA component (TERC, n = 2) and regulator of telomere elongation helicase 1 (RTEL1, n = 1). Half of the patients died (n = 29) or underwent lung transplantation (n = 5), with a median survival of 39.9 months. The risk prediction models composite physiology index (CPI), hazard ratio (HR) 1.07 (95.0% CI 1.04-1.10), and gender-age-physiology index (GAP) stage I predicted survival statistically significantly (p<0.001) compared to combined stages II and III. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirmed the results of earlier studies showing that FPF patients' radiological and histopathological patterns are diverse. Moreover, radiological and histological features revealed unusual patterns and their combinations.

A roadmap to precision treatments for familial pulmonary fibrosis.

Interstitial lung diseases (ILDs) in adults and children (chILD) are a heterogeneous group of lung disorders leading to inflammation, abnormal tissue repair and scarring of the lung parenchyma often resulting in respiratory failure and death. Inherited factors directly cause, or contribute significantly to the risk of developing ILD, so called familial pulmonary fibrosis (FPF), and monogenic forms may have a poor prognosis and respond poorly to current treatments. Specific, variant-targeted or precision treatments are lacking. Clinical trials of repurposed drugs, anti-fibrotic medications and specific treatments are emerging but for many patients no interventions exist. We convened an expert working group to develop an overarching framework to address the existing research gaps in basic, translational, and clinical research and identified areas for future development of preclinical models, candidate medications and innovative clinical trials. In this Position Paper, we summarise working group discussions, recommendations, and unresolved questions concerning precision treatments for FPF.

A Test to Comprehensively Capture the Known Genetic Component of Familial Pulmonary Fibrosis.

The recent European Respiratory Society statement on familial pulmonary fibrosis supports the need for genetic testing in the care of patients and their relatives. However, no solution (i.e., a concrete test) was provided to implement genetic testing in daily practice. Herein, we tabulated and standardized the nomenclature of 128 genetic variants in 20 genes implicated in adult-onset pulmonary fibrosis. The objective was to develop a laboratory-developed test (LDT) on the basis of standard Sanger sequencing to capture all known familial pulmonary fibrosis-associated variants. Targeted DNA fragments were amplified using harmonized PCR conditions to perform the LDT in a single 96-well plate. The new genetic test was evaluated in 62 sporadic cases of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. As expected in this population, we observed a low yield of disease-causing mutations. More important, 100% of targeted variants by the LDT were successfully evaluated. Furthermore, four variants of uncertain significance with in silico-predicted deleterious scores were identified in three patients, suggesting novel pathogenic variants in genes known to cause idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Finally, the MUC5B promoter variant rs35705950 was strongly enriched in these patients with a minor allele frequency of 41.1% compared with 10.6% in a matched population-based cohort (n = 29,060), leading to an estimation that this variant may explain up to 35% of the population-attributable risk. This LDT provides a solution for rapid clinical translation. Technical laboratory details are provided so that specialized pulmonary centers can implement the LDT in house to expedite the clinical recommendations of expert panels.

Diagnosis of interstitial lung diseases: from Averill A. Liebow to artificial intelligence.

Histopathologic criteria of usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP)/idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) were defined over the years and endorsed by leading organizations decades after Dr. Averill A. Liebow first coined the term UIP in the 1960s as a distinct pathologic pattern of fibrotic interstitial lung disease. Novel technology and recent research on interstitial lung diseases with genetic component shed light on molecular pathogenesis of UIP/IPF. Two antifibrotic agents introduced in the mid-2010s opened a new era of therapeutic approaches to UIP/IPF, albeit contentious issues regarding their efficacy, side effects, and costs. Recently, the concept of progressive pulmonary fibrosis was introduced to acknowledge additional types of progressive fibrosing interstitial lung diseases with the clinical and pathologic phenotypes comparable to those of UIP/IPF. Likewise, some authors have proposed a paradigm shift by considering UIP as a stand-alone diagnostic entity to encompass other fibrosing interstitial lung diseases that manifest a relentless progression as in IPF. These trends signal a pendulum moving toward the tendency of lumping diagnoses, which poses a risk of obscuring potentially important information crucial to both clinical and research purposes. Recent advances in whole slide imaging for digital pathology and artificial intelligence technology could offer an unprecedented opportunity to enhance histopathologic evaluation of interstitial lung diseases. However, current clinical practice trends of moving away from surgical lung biopsies in interstitial lung disease patients may become a limiting factor in this endeavor as it would be difficult to build a large histopathologic database with correlative clinical data required for artificial intelligence models.

Genetic and environmental factors in interstitial lung diseases: current and future perspectives on early diagnosis of high-risk cohorts.

Within the wide scope of interstitial lung diseases (ILDs), familial pulmonary fibrosis (FPF) is being increasingly recognized as a specific entity, with earlier onset, faster progression, and suboptimal responses to immunosuppression. FPF is linked to heritable pathogenic variants in telomere-related genes (TRGs), surfactant-related genes (SRGs), telomere shortening (TS), and early cellular senescence. Telomere abnormalities have also been identified in some sporadic cases of fibrotic ILD. Air pollution and other environmental exposures carry additive risk to genetic predisposition in pulmonary fibrosis. We provide a perspective on how these features impact on screening strategies for relatives of FPF patients, interstitial lung abnormalities, ILD multi-disciplinary team (MDT) discussion, and disparities and barriers to genomic testing. We also describe our experience with establishing a familial interstitial pneumonia (FIP) clinic and provide guidance on how to identify patients with telomere dysfunction who would benefit most from genomic testing.

Prevalence, Risk Factors, and Outcomes of Adult Interstitial Lung Abnormalities: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Rationale: Incidental parenchymal abnormalities detected on chest computed tomography scans are termed interstitial lung abnormalities (ILAs). ILAs may represent early interstitial lung disease (ILD) and are associated with an increased risk of progressive fibrosis and mortality. The prevalence of ILAs is unknown, with heterogeneity across study populations. Objectives: Estimate the pooled prevalence of ILAs in lung cancer screening, general population-based, and at-risk familial cohorts using meta-analysis; identify variables associated with ILA risk; and characterize ILA-associated mortality. Methods: The study protocol was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42022373203), and Meta-analyses of Observational Studies in Epidemiology recommendations were followed. Relevant studies were searched on Embase and Medline. Study titles were screened and abstracts reviewed for full-text eligibility. Random effect models were used to pool prevalence estimates for specified subgroups and ILA-associated mortality risk. Risk of ILAs was estimated based on age, sex, and FVC. Quality assessment was conducted using an adapted Assessment Tool for Prevalence Studies. Measurements and Main Results: The search identified 9,536 studies, with 22 included, comprising 88,325 participants. The pooled ILA prevalence was 7% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.01-0.13) in lung cancer screening, 7% (95% CI, 0.04-0.10) in general population, and 26% (95% CI, 0.20-0.32) in familial cohorts. Pooled mortality risk was increased in those with ILAs (odds ratio, 3.56; 95% CI, 2.19-5.81). Older age, male sex, and lower FVC% were associated with greater odds of ILA. Conclusions: Populations undergoing imaging for non-ILD indications demonstrate high ILA prevalence. Standardized reporting and follow-up of ILAs is needed, including defining those at greatest risk of progression to ILD.

Optimizing Screening for Early Disease Detection in Familial Pulmonary Fibrosis (FLORIS): A Prospective Cohort Study Design.

Background: Familial pulmonary fibrosis (FPF) can be defined as pulmonary fibrosis in two or more first-degree family members. The first-degree family members of FPF patients are at high risk of developing FPF and are eligible for screening. Reproducible studies investigating risk factors for disease are much needed. Methods: Description of the screening study protocol for a single-center, prospective cohort study; the study will include 200 asymptomatic, first-degree family members of patients with FPF who will undergo three study visits in two years. The primary objective is determining the diagnostic value of parameters for detection of early FPF; the secondary objectives are determining the optimal timing of the screening interval and gaining insight into the natural history of early FPF. The presence of interstitial lung disease (ILD) changes on high-resolution computed tomography of the chest is indicative of preclinical ILD; the changes are determined at baseline. The comparison between the group with and without ILD changes is made for clinical parameters (pulmonary function, presence of digital clubbing, presence of Velcro-like crackles, blood count, liver- and kidney-function testing, patient-reported cough and dyspnea score) and exploratory parameters. Discussion: This study will be the first large-size, prospective, longitudinal cohort study for yearly screening of asymptomatic family members of FPF patients investigating the diagnostic value of parameters, including lung function, to detect early FPF. More effective screening strategies could advance early disease detection.

The Genetic and Epigenetic Footprint in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis and Familial Pulmonary Fibrosis: A State-of-the-Art Review.

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a rare disease of the lung with a largely unknown etiology and a poor prognosis. Intriguingly, forms of familial pulmonary fibrosis (FPF) have long been known and linked to specific genetic mutations. There is little evidence of the possible role of genetics in the etiology of sporadic IPF. We carried out a non-systematic, narrative literature review aimed at describing the main known genetic and epigenetic mechanisms that are involved in the pathogenesis and prognosis of IPF and FPF. In this review, we highlighted the mutations in classical genes associated with FPF, including those encoding for telomerases (TERT, TERC, PARN, RTEL1), which are also found in about 10-20% of cases of sporadic IPF. In addition to the Mendelian forms, mutations in the genes encoding for the surfactant proteins (SFTPC, SFTPA1, SFTPA2, ABCA3) and polymorphisms of genes for the mucin MUC5B and the Toll-interacting protein TOLLIP are other pathways favoring the fibrogenesis that have been thoroughly explored. Moreover, great attention has been paid to the main epigenetic alterations (DNA methylation, histone modification and non-coding RNA gene silencing) that are emerging to play a role in fibrogenesis. Finally, a gaze on the shared mechanisms between cancer and fibrogenesis, and future perspectives on the genetics of pulmonary fibrosis have been analyzed.

The Effectiveness of Nintedanib in Patients with Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis, Familial Pulmonary Fibrosis and Progressive Fibrosing Interstitial Lung Diseases: A Real-World Study.

Background: Nintedanib is an oral multitarget tyrosine kinase inhibitor approved for the treatment of patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). Recent evidence demonstrated that nintedanib reduced functional disease progression also in subjects with non-IPF progressive fibrosing interstitial lung disease (PF-ILD). However, real-life data on the effectiveness of nintedanib in PF-ILD and familial pulmonary fibrosis (FPF) are lacking. Methods: this retrospective monocentric study enrolled 197 patients affected with IPF, PF-ILD and FPF treated with nintedanib at the Referral Centre of Siena from 2014 to 2021. Pulmonary functional tests and survival data were collected throughout the observation period for the evaluation of mortality and disease progression outcomes. Results: nintedanib treatment significantly reduced the FVC decline rate in IPF and PF-ILD subgroups, but not in FPF subjects. No significant differences were observed among the subgroups in terms of survival, which appeared to be influenced by gender and impaired lung function (FVC < 70% of predicted value). Concerning disease progression rate, a diagnosis of FPF is associated with more pronounced FVC decline despite nintedanib treatment. Conclusions: our research studies the effectiveness and safety of nintedanib in reducing functional disease progression of IPF and PF-ILD. FPF appeared to be less responsive to nintedanib, even though no differences were observed in terms of survival.

Genetic testing in interstitial lung disease: An international survey.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Genetic analysis is emerging for interstitial lung diseases (ILDs); however, ILD practices are not yet standardized. We surveyed patients', relatives' and pulmonologists' experiences and needs on genetic testing in ILD to evaluate the current situation and identify future needs. METHODS: A clinical epidemiologist (MT) together with members of the ERS taskforce and representatives of the European Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis and related disorders Federation (EU-IPFF) patient organisation developed a survey for patients, relatives and pulmonologists. Online surveys consisted of questions on five main topics: awareness of hereditary ILD, the provision of information, genetic testing, screening of asymptomatic relatives and clinical impact of genetic analysis in ILD. RESULTS: Survey respondents consisted of 458 patients with ILD, 181 patients' relatives and 352 pulmonologists. Most respondents think genetic testing can be useful, particularly for explaining the cause of disease, predicting its course, determining risk for developing disease and the need to test relatives. Informing patients and relatives on genetic analysis is primarily performed by the pulmonologist, but 88% (218) of pulmonologists identify a need for more information and 96% (240) ask for guidelines on genetic testing in ILD. A third of the pulmonologists who would offer genetic testing currently do not offer a genetic test, primarily because they have limited access to genetic tests. Following genetic testing, 72% (171) of pulmonologists may change the diagnostic work-up and 57% (137) may change the therapeutic approach. CONCLUSION: This survey shows that there is wide support for implementation of genetic testing in ILD and a high need for information, guidelines and access to testing among patients, their relatives and pulmonologists.

Extrapulmonary manifestations of a telomere syndrome in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis are associated with decreased survival.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a heterogenous disease with a median survival of 3-4 years. Patients with mutations in telomere-related genes exhibit extrapulmonary signs and symptoms. These patients represent a distinct phenotype of IPF with worse survival. As genetic analyses are not available for most patients with IPF, we sought to determine the predictive value of extrapulmonary signs and symptoms of a telomere syndrome in patients with IPF. METHODS: We retrospectively studied 409 patients with IPF. Clinical characteristics, laboratory results and family history suggestive of a telomere syndrome were related to leukocyte telomere length measured by quantitative PCR and patient outcomes. RESULTS: The cohort included 293 patients with sporadic IPF and 116 patients with a background of familial pulmonary fibrosis. Any or a combination of a clinical history (haematological disease, liver disease, early greying of hair, nail dystrophy, skin abnormalities), a family history or haematological laboratory abnormalities (macrocytosis, anaemia, thrombopenia or leukopenia) suggestive of a telomere syndrome was present in 27% of IPF patients and associated with shorter leukocyte telomere length and shorter survival (p = 0.002 in a multivariate model). In sporadic IPF, having either a clinical history, family history or haematological laboratory abnormalities was not significantly associated with decreased survival (p = 0.07 in a multivariate model). CONCLUSION: Taking a careful clinical and family history focused on extrapulmonary manifestations of a telomere syndrome can provide important prognostic information in patients with IPF, as this is associated with shorter survival.

The Role of Genetic Testing in Pulmonary Fibrosis: A Perspective From the Pulmonary Fibrosis Foundation Genetic Testing Work Group.

Patients with familial pulmonary fibrosis represent a subset of patients with pulmonary fibrosis in whom inherited gene variation predisposes them to disease development. In the appropriate setting, genetic testing allows for personalized assessment of disease, recognition of clinically relevant extrapulmonary manifestations, and assessing susceptibility in unaffected relatives. However currently, the use of genetic testing is inconsistent, partly because of the lack of guidance regarding high-yield scenarios in which the results of genetic testing can inform clinical decision-making. To address this, the Pulmonary Fibrosis Foundation commissioned a genetic testing work group comprising pulmonologists, geneticists, and genetic counselors from the United States to provide guidance on genetic testing in patients with pulmonary fibrosis. This CHEST special feature presents a concise review of these proceedings and reviews pulmonary fibrosis susceptibility, clinically available genetic testing methods, and clinical scenarios in which genetic testing should be considered.

Connective Tissue Growth Factor Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms in (Familial) Pulmonary Fibrosis and Connective Tissue Disease Associated Interstitial Lung Disease.

PURPOSE: Connective tissue growth factor (CTGF) is an important mediator in fibrotic disease. Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in CTGF have been found to be associated with different fibrotic diseases and CTGF protein was found to be upregulated in lung tissue, bronchoalveolar lavage cells, and plasma of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) patients. We investigated whether genetic variants predispose to sporadic IPF (spIPF), familial pulmonary fibrosis (FPF), and connective tissue disease associated ILD (CTD-ILD). METHODS: In total, 294 patients with spIPF and 294 healthy individuals were genotyped for CTGF rs12526196, rs9402373, rs6918698, and rs9399005. For replication of CTGF rs6918698 findings in pulmonary fibrosis, 128 patients with FPF, 125 with CTD-ILD, and an independent control cohort of 130 individuals were included. Lung tissue of 6 IPF patients was stained for CTGF to assess pulmonary localization. RESULTS: Of the four SNPs, only the minor allele frequency (MAF) of CTGF rs6918698 deviated between spIPF (MAF 0.41) and controls (MAF 0.47; OR 0.774 (0.615-0.975); p = 0.030). Further comparison of CTGF rs6918698G showed a difference between FPF (MAF 0.33) and controls (MAF 0.48; OR 0.545 (0.382-0.778); p = 0.001), but not with CTD-ILD. CTGF was localized in alveolar and bronchiolar epithelium, alveolar macrophages, myofibroblasts and endothelium and highly expressed in the basal cell layer of sandwich foci. CONCLUSION: CTGF rs6918698G associates with spIPF and with FPF, but not with CTD-ILD in a Dutch cohort. CTGF is localized in lung tissue involved in IPF pathogenesis. Further research into the role of this SNP on CTGF expression and fibrogenesis is warranted.

The Extent of Inflammatory Cell Infiltrate and Fibrosis in Lungs of Telomere- and Surfactant-Related Familial Pulmonary Fibrosis.

Familial pulmonary fibrosis (FPF) is a monogenic disease most commonly involving telomere- (TERT) or surfactant- (SFTP) related mutations. These mutations have been shown to alter lymphocytic inflammatory responses, and FPF biopsies with histological lymphocytic infiltrates have been reported. Recently, a model of a surfactant mutation in mice showed that the disease initially started with an inflammatory response followed by fibrogenesis. Since inflammation and fibrogenesis are targeted by different drugs, we investigated whether the degree of these two features co-localize or occur independently in different entities of FPF, and whether they influence survival. We quantified the number of lymphocyte aggregates per surface area, the extent of diffuse lymphocyte cell infiltrate, the number of fibroblast foci per surface area, and the percentage of fibrotic lung surface area in digitally scanned hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) sections of diagnostic surgical biopsies of patients with TERT-related FPF (TERT-PF; n = 17), SFTP-related FPF (SFTP-PF; n = 7), and sporadic idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (sIPF; n = 10). For comparison, we included biopsies of patients with cellular non-specific interstitial pneumonia (cNSIP; n = 10), an inflammatory interstitial lung disease with high lymphocyte influx and usually responsive to immunosuppressive therapy. The degree of inflammatory cell infiltrate and fibrosis in TERT-PF and SFTP-PF was not significantly different from that in sIPF. In comparison with cNSIP, the extent of lymphocyte infiltrates was significantly lower in sIPF and TERT-PF, but not in SFTP-PF. However, in contrast with cNSIP, in sIPF, TERT-PF, and SFTP-PF, diffuse lymphocyte cell infiltrates were predominantly present and lymphocyte aggregates were only present in fibrotic areas (p < 0.0001). Furthermore, fibroblast foci and percentage of fibrotic lung surface were associated with survival (p = 0.022 and p = 0.018, respectively), while this association was not observed for lymphocyte aggregates or diffuse lymphocytic infiltration. Inflammatory cells in diagnostic lung biopsies of TERT-PF, SFTP-PF, and sIPF were largely confined to fibrotic areas. However, based on inflammation and fibrosis, no differences were found between FPF and sIPF, substantiating the histological similarities between monogenic familial and sporadic disease. Furthermore, the degree of fibrosis, rather than inflammation, correlates with survival, supporting that fibrogenesis is the key feature for therapeutic targeting of FPF.

Dyspnoea with progressive "idiopathic" pulmonary fibrosis.

Telomeres are repetitive nucleotide sequences that prevent chromosomal shortening in cell replication. Short telomeres have been implicated in the pathogenesis of interstitial lung disease. Patients with short telomere related pulmonary fibrosis can have computed tomography (CT) findings inconsistent with pro-typical usual interstitial pneumonia/idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (UIP/IPF) pattern. They can have rapid progression and overall worse prognosis. Antifibrotic drugs, like pirfenidone, can be used to slow the progression of disease, but there is conflicting data in patients with Telomerase reverse transcriptase/Telomerase RNA component (TERT/TERC) mutations, hence genetic testing plays an important role in determining the therapeutic options. These patients should be referred for lung transplantation early. We present a case of rapidly progressive pulmonary fibrosis associated with short telomere.

Familial Pulmonary Fibrosis: Genetic Features and Clinical Implications.

Pulmonary fibrosis comprises a wide range of fibrotic lung diseases with unknown pathogenesis and poor prognosis. Familial pulmonary fibrosis (FPF) represents a unique subgroup of patients in which at least one other relative is also affected. Patients with FPF exhibit a wide range of pulmonary fibrosis phenotypes, although idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis is the most common subtype. Despite variable disease manifestations, patients with FPF experience worse survival compared with their counterparts with the sporadic disease form. Therefore, ascertaining a positive family history not only provides prognostic value but should also raise suspicion for the inheritance of an underlying causative genetic variant within kindreds. By focusing on FPF kindreds, rare variants within surfactant metabolism and telomere maintenance genes have been discovered. However, such genetic variation is not solely restricted to FPF, as similar rare variants are found in patients with seemingly sporadic pulmonary fibrosis, further supporting the idea of genetic susceptibility underlying pulmonary fibrosis as a whole. Researchers are beginning to show how the presence of rare variants may inform clinical management, such as informing predisposition risk for yet unaffected relatives as well as informing prognosis and therapeutic strategy for those already affected. Despite these advances, rare variants in surfactant and telomere-related genes only explain the genetic basis in about one-quarter of FPF kindreds. Therefore, research is needed to identify the missing genetic contributors of pulmonary fibrosis, which would not only improve our understanding of disease pathobiology but may offer additional opportunities to improve the health of patients.