RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Despite the explicit biomechanical advantages associated with FNS, it is currently inconclusive, based on the existing literature, whether Femoral Neck System (FNS) outperforms Cannulated cancellous screws (CSS) in all aspects. Due to variances in bone morphology and bone density between the elderly and young cohorts, additional research is warranted to ascertain whether the benefits of FNS remain applicable to elderly osteoporosis patients. This study aimed to investigate the biomechanical properties of FNS in osteoporotic femoral neck fractures and propose optimization strategies including additional anti-rotation screw. METHODS: The Pauwels type III femoral neck fracture models were reconstructed using finite element numerical techniques. The CSS, FNS, and modified FNS (M-FNS) models were created based on features and parameterization. The various internal fixations were individually assembled with the assigned normal and osteoporotic models. In the static analysis mode, uniform stress loads were imposed on all models. The deformation and stress variations of the femur and internal fixation models were recorded. Simultaneously, descriptions of shear stress and strain energy were also incorporated into the figures. RESULTS: Following bone mass reduction, deformations in CSS, FNS, and M-FNS increased by 47%, 52%, and 40%, respectively. The equivalent stress increments for CSS, FNS, and M-FNS were 3%, 43%, 17%, respectively. Meanwhile, variations in strain energy and shear stress were observed. The strain energy increments for CSS, FNS, and M-FNS were 4%, 76%, and 5%, respectively. The shear stress increments for CSS, FNS, and M-FNS were 4%, 65% and 44%, respectively. Within the osteoporotic model, M-FNS demonstrated the lowest total displacement, shear stress, and strain energy. CONCLUSION: Modified FNS showed better stability in the osteoporotic model (OM). Using FNS alone may not exhibit immediate shear resistance advantages in OM. Concurrently, the addition of one anti-rotation screw can be regarded as a potential optimization choice, ensuring a harmonious alignment with the structural characteristics of FNS.
Assuntos
Parafusos Ósseos , Fraturas do Colo Femoral , Análise de Elementos Finitos , Fixação Interna de Fraturas , Fraturas por Osteoporose , Humanos , Fraturas do Colo Femoral/cirurgia , Fraturas do Colo Femoral/diagnóstico por imagem , Fraturas por Osteoporose/cirurgia , Fraturas por Osteoporose/diagnóstico por imagem , Fraturas por Osteoporose/fisiopatologia , Fixação Interna de Fraturas/métodos , Fixação Interna de Fraturas/instrumentação , Fenômenos Biomecânicos , Estresse Mecânico , Colo do Fêmur/diagnóstico por imagem , Colo do Fêmur/cirurgia , Idoso , Densidade Óssea , FemininoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Medical education related to bone fracture must address numerous challenges including complex anatomical characteristics, diverse injury mechanisms, fracture typing, and treatment modalities. Our newly developed 3D printed model comprises components that may be combined or split to simulate various anatomical features, fracture types, and treatment modalities. This study aims to analyze the teaching utility of the new 3D-printed model compared with the traditional solid model. METHODS: This prospective study included 112 students randomly assigned to fracture-related education with a conventional model or the newly developed 3D-printed model. All students received 40 min of lecture, 20 min for femoral neck and 20 min for tibiofibular fractures, and a post-class quiz (10 min each) immediately followed. Scores on tests of fracture-related knowledge and user satisfaction were measured pre and post education for comparison. RESULTS: The 3D printing group had an advantage in retention of anatomic knowledge, fracture typing and choice of treatment for the femoral neck fracture (P < 0.05). For the tibiofibular fracture the 3D printing group had an advantage in retention of anatomic knowledge and fracture complications (P < 0.05).Scores on the questionnaire survey also showed increased satisfaction in the 3D-printed model group(P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The proposed 3D-printed model can enhance the teaching effect significantly and has potential for widespread use in medical student education.
Assuntos
Fraturas Ósseas , Modelos Anatômicos , Impressão Tridimensional , Estudantes de Medicina , Humanos , Estudos Prospectivos , Masculino , Feminino , Fraturas Ósseas/terapia , Adulto Jovem , Fraturas do Colo Femoral , Educação de Graduação em Medicina/métodos , Educação Médica/métodosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Displaced femoral neck fractures frequently result in considerable patient morbidity, with complications such as postoperative femoral neck shortening occurring in up to 39.1% of cases. This shortening is associated with reduced hip function and mobility. The Femoral Neck System (FNS), which allows for controlled sliding to facilitate fracture reduction and healing, may mitigate these issues. However, the ideal sliding distance to balance fracture healing and minimize complications is not well defined. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study of 179 patients who underwent FNS fixation for displaced femoral neck fractures at our institution from September 2019 to September 2023. Patients were categorized into three groups based on the intraoperative sliding distance allowed by the FNS: the Minimal Slide group (≤ 5 mm), the Moderate Slide group (> 5 to ≤ 10 mm), and the Extensive Slide group (> 10 to 20 mm). Primary outcomes included postoperative femoral neck shortening, the incidence of moderate to severe shortening, time to fracture union, and hip joint function as assessed by the Harris Hip Score (HHS) and the Parker Mobility Score. Secondary outcomes included complication rates such as implant cut-out, nonunion, avascular necrosis of the femoral head, and the need for secondary surgery. RESULTS: The Extensive Slide group of moderate to severe shortening at 32.31%, which was 1.59-fold and 8.88-fold that of the Moderate Slide (20.34%) and Minimal Slide group's (3.64%), respectively (P < 0.01). The sliding predominantly occurred within the first three months postoperatively and had substantially ceased by six months. At one year postoperatively, the median shortening was 2.7 mm (IQR, 0.7 to 3.5 mm) for the Minimal Slide group, a value that was notably lower compared to the 3.2 mm (IQR, 2.4 to 4.6 mm) for the Moderate Slide group and the 3.5 mm (IQR, 1.3 to 8.1 mm) for the Extensive Slide group. The average time to achieve union was similar across all groups, with no significant differences. Functional outcomes, as assessed by the Harris Hip Score (HHS) and the Parker Mobility Score, the Harris Hip Score (HHS) demonstrated statistical significance, the Parker Mobility Score did not reach statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS: Restricting FNS slide to ≤ 5 mm in surgery may reduce shortening, improve hip function, and not hinder fracture healing or implant stability. Considering the key 3-month sliding timeline postoperatively is advisable in clinical practice. Further research with a broader patient cohort is vital to confirm these findings and to anchor them in evidence-based practice.
Assuntos
Fraturas do Colo Femoral , Fixação Interna de Fraturas , Humanos , Fraturas do Colo Femoral/cirurgia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Masculino , Feminino , Idoso , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Fixação Interna de Fraturas/métodos , Estudos de Coortes , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Resultado do Tratamento , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/prevenção & controle , Consolidação da Fratura , Colo do Fêmur/cirurgia , Colo do Fêmur/diagnóstico por imagem , AdultoRESUMO
Background: The long-term studies for femoral neck fractures (FNFs) in young patients treated with closed reduction and internal fixation (CRIF) are limited. This study aimed to evaluate the long-term outcomes of a group of young patients (<65 years) with FNFs treated with CRIF at our department during the last decade. We estimated treatment failure rates and identified risk factors for poor outcomes. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included patients under 65 with a unilateral FNF treated with CRIF using partially threaded cannulated screws (CSs) between 2011 and 2021. During the latest follow-up visit, we recorded the patients' complications, re-admissions, reoperations, functional outcomes, and quality of life scores. Results: We included 52 patients with a mean age of 53.04 years and a mean follow-up of 5.3 (range: 1.3-11) years. No non-union was recorded. Nine patients (17.3 %) underwent total hip arthroplasty (THA) due to femoral head avascular necrosis (AVN) at an average of 1.68 years following the index operation (THA group). The mean age (p =0.96), trauma type (p =0.290), sex prevalence (p =0.989), Garden classification (p =0.187), CSs number (p =0.751), and comorbidities (p =0.516) were comparable between THA and non-THA groups. Time from trauma to index surgery was significantly shorter for the THA than the non-THA group (p =0.03). Conclusions: During a mid-to-long follow-up, 17.3 % of patients under 65 years who were treated with CRIF and CSs for FNFs developed AVN. Age, trauma type, comorbidities, time from trauma to treatment, and the number of screws did not affect the outcomes. HIPPOKRATIA 2024, 28 (1):29-34.
RESUMO
Backgroud: Internal fixation has been established as a treatment of choice in relatively young patients with femoral neck fractures. Due to the characteristics of femoral neck anatomy and blood supply, complications such as malunion, nonunion, avascular necrosis, and femoral neck shortening can occur after internal fixation of femoral neck fractures. Unlike other complications such as avascular necrosis or nonunion, femoral neck shortening has not been relatively well studied. This study aimed to investigate the risk factors and clinical outcomes of femoral neck shortening after internal fixation of femoral neck fractures. Methods: From June 2012 to July 2022, among 102 patients who underwent internal fixation of femoral neck fractures, 94 patients who met inclusion and exclusion criteria were retrospectively analyzed. Internal fixation of the femoral neck was done with cannulated compression screws or a femoral neck system. Patients were divided into 2 groups; femoral neck shortening (≥ 5 mm) and no shortening (< 5 mm) according to measurement on follow-up hip anteroposterior (AP) simple radiographs compared with postoperative hip AP simple radiographs. Demographic and radiographic data were compared between the 2 groups. The modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS) and a visual analog scale (VAS) were used to evaluate the clinical outcomes. Results: Among 94 patients, femoral neck shortening was observed in 33 (35.1%). In chi-square test, Pauwels angle, Garden type III or IV (displacement), and cortical comminution were significantly correlated with neck shortening (p < 0.05). In the multifactorial logistic regression test, cortical comminution was significantly correlated with femoral neck shortening (p < 0.01). The shortening group showed significantly lower clinical scores in terms of mHHS and VAS (p < 0.01). Conclusions: The femoral neck shortening group showed significantly lower clinical scores of mHHS and VAS than the no-shortening group. The presence of cortical comminution in preoperative hip computed tomography is a risk factor of femoral neck shortening after internal fixation of femoral neck fractures.
Assuntos
Fraturas do Colo Femoral , Fixação Interna de Fraturas , Humanos , Fraturas do Colo Femoral/cirurgia , Fraturas do Colo Femoral/diagnóstico por imagem , Fixação Interna de Fraturas/efeitos adversos , Fixação Interna de Fraturas/métodos , Feminino , Masculino , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Adulto , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Colo do Fêmur/diagnóstico por imagem , Colo do Fêmur/cirurgiaRESUMO
Femoral neck fractures are a common complication of falls, particularly in the osteoporotic elderly female population. This case highlights the significance of properly radiologically evaluating elderly patients with falls. A 68-year-old White female with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation on anticoagulation, nicotine use disorder, chronic hyponatremia, hypertension, and hyperlipidemia presented to the emergency department (ED) in considerable pain four days after a previously diagnosed left pubic symphysis fracture. Repeat imaging (X-ray and computed tomography (CT)) was significant for a left femoral neck fracture concurrent with the aforementioned pelvic fracture. Within 48 hours of admission, the patient underwent a hemiarthroplasty of the left hip. The postoperative course was unremarkable, except for immensely decreased pain and a remarkable ability to ambulate, and on postoperative day three, the patient was discharged. In patients with an overall high risk of hip fracture, CT imaging should be considered after X-ray in an effort to eliminate the frequency of undiagnosed fractures. It is essential to thoroughly evaluate the entire film, even after one fracture is found. This is crucial to a patient's overall well-being and can contribute to many unwanted phenomena.
RESUMO
Artificial Intelligence (AI) is a dynamic area of computer science that is constantly expanding its practical benefits in various fields. The aim of this study was to analyze AI-guided radiological assessment of femoral neck fractures by performing a systematic review and multilevel meta-analysis of primary studies. The study protocol was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) on May 21, 2024 [CRD42024541055]. The updated Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines were strictly followed. A systematic literature search of PubMed, Web of Science, Ovid (Med), and Epistemonikos databases was conducted until May 31, 2024. Critical appraisal using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 (QUADAS-2) tool showed that the overall quality of the included studies was moderate. In addition, publication bias was presented in funnel plots. A frequentist multilevel meta-analysis was performed using a random effects model with inverse variance and restricted maximum likelihood heterogeneity estimator with Hartung-Knapp adjustment. The accuracy between AI-based and human assessment of femoral neck fractures, sensitivity and specificity with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. Study heterogeneity was assessed using the Higgins test I2 (low heterogeneity <25%, moderate heterogeneity: 25%-75%, and high heterogeneity >75%). Finally, 11 studies with a total of 21,163 radiographs were included for meta-analysis. The results of the study quality assessment using the QUADAS-2 tool are presented in Table 2. The funnel plots indicated a moderate publication bias. The AI showed excellent accuracy in assessment of femoral neck fractures (Accuracy = 0.91, 95% CI 0.83 to 0.96; I2 = 99%; p < 0.01). The AI showed good sensitivity in assessment of femoral neck fractures (Sensitivity = 0.87, 95% CI 0.77 to 0.93; I2 = 98%; p < 0.01). The AI showed excellent specificity in assessment of femoral neck fractures (Specificity = 0.91, 95% CI 0.77 to 0.97; I2 = 97%; p < 0.01). AI-guided radiological assessment of femoral neck fractures showed excellent accuracy and specificity as well as good sensitivity. The use of AI as a faster and more reliable assessment tool and as an aid in radiological routine seems justified.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to use machine learning (ML) to establish risk factor and prediction models of osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH) in patients with femoral neck fractures (FNFs) after internal fixation. METHODS: We retrospectively collected clinical data of patients with FNFs who were followed up for at least 2 years. Only intracapsular FNFs were included. In total, 437 patients and 24 variables were enrolled. The entire dataset was divided into training (89.5 %) and test (10.5 %) datasets. Six models-logistic regression, naive Bayes, decision tree, random forest, multilayer perceptron, and AdaBoost-were established and validated for predicting postoperative ONFH. We compared the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), accuracy, recall, and F1 score of different models. In addition, a confusion matrix, density curve, and learning curve were used to evaluate the model performance. RESULTS: The logistic regression model performed best at predicting ONFH in patients with FNFs undergoing internal fixation surgery, with an AUC, accuracy, recall, F1 score, and prediction value of 0.84, 0.89, 1.00, 0.94, and 89.1 %, respectively. The learning and density curves demonstrated a good prediction fitting degree and distinct separation. When establishing the ML models, the reduction quality, internal fixation removal, American Society of Anesthesiologists classification, injury mechanism, and displacement distance of the medial cortex were the top five risk factors positively correlated with the occurrence of ONFH. CONCLUSIONS: The logistic regression model had excellent performance in predicting ONFH in patients with FNFs after internal fixation and could provide valuable guidance in clinical decision-making. When choosing treatment options for patients with FNFs, doctors should identify the risk factors and consider using the presented models to help anticipate outcomes and select individualised treatment.
Assuntos
Fraturas do Colo Femoral , Necrose da Cabeça do Fêmur , Fixação Interna de Fraturas , Aprendizado de Máquina , Humanos , Fixação Interna de Fraturas/efeitos adversos , Fraturas do Colo Femoral/cirurgia , Masculino , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Necrose da Cabeça do Fêmur/cirurgia , Fatores de Risco , Adulto , Idoso , Modelos Logísticos , Medição de Risco , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Curva ROCRESUMO
INTRODUCTION AND IMPORTANCE: Simultaneous bilateral femoral neck fractures are rare and challenging, often occurring due to high-energy trauma in younger adults or low-energy trauma compounded by metabolic issues in elderly populations. Neglected cases, particularly in the context of narcotic addiction and limited access to healthcare, present unique management dilemmas. This study aims to contribute insights into the clinical presentation, management strategies, and outcomes of two neglected simultaneous bilateral femoral neck fractures. CASE PRESENTATION: We present two cases: a 65-year-old woman and a 45-year-old man, both with a history of narcotic addiction, who presented with neglected simultaneous bilateral femoral neck fractures. Both cases demonstrated significant pain and functional impairment necessitating surgical intervention. CLINICAL DISCUSSION: Treatment involved one-stage bilateral hip hemiarthroplasty, which successfully restored function without postoperative complications during follow-up periods of 14 and 16 months. Discussion includes the challenges of diagnosing and managing neglected fractures in vulnerable populations, emphasizing the importance of early recognition and tailored surgical approaches. CONCLUSION: Our study suggests the efficacy of one-stage bilateral hip hemiarthroplasty in managing neglected simultaneous bilateral femoral neck fractures due to narcotic addiction. However, variability in outcomes across different surgical techniques highlights the need for individualized treatment plans based on patient-specific factors.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Displaced femoral neck fractures are associated with a high revision rate. The new femoral neck system(FNS) offers advantages in fixation stability, potentially reducing the need for revision. The purpose of this study was to compare the revision rate of patients with different reduction quality treated with the FNS and cannulated screws (CS). METHODS: This retrospective study included patients with Garden III or IV femoral neck fractures who underwent osteosynthesis in a level 1 trauma center between July 2019 and June 2023. A total of 141 cases met the inclusion criteria and received treatment with either the FNS (N = 65) or CS (N = 76). The quality of fracture reduction, surgical complications (such as femoral neck shortening, avascular necrosis of femoral head, nonunion of fracture, implant failure and withdrawal), revision surgery and the reasons for revision were analyzed. RESULTS: The mean age of the 141 cases was 52.0 years (range 18-65); with sixty-five cases being male (46.1%). Eighty-four fractures (59.6%) were classified as Garden type III. Reduction quality was good in 71 cases (50.4%) and fair in 70 cases. The mean follow-up period was 25.9 months (range 12-46). A total of 26 cases(18.4%) underwent revision surgery. The revision rate in cases with good reduction was 11.3% (8/71 cases), with seven cases (four hardware removal and three arthroplasty) in the CS group and one case (arthroplasty for fracture nonunion and implant failure) in the FNS group, a significant difference was found between the two groups(P = 0.041). Among the 18 cases (25.7%, 18/70) with fair reduction who underwent revision surgery, nine cases (six hardware removal and three arthroplasty) in the CS group, and nine cases (arthroplasty for implant failure and cut-out) in the FNS group, and there was no significant difference between the two groups (P = 0.672). The total revision rate between the FNS group (15.4%, 10/65) and the CS group (21.1%, 16/76) was not significantly different (P = 0.387). CONCLUSIONS: The total revision rate between the FNS and CS group showed no difference. However, in cases with good reduction, the revision rate was lower in the FNS group compared to the CS group.
Assuntos
Parafusos Ósseos , Fraturas do Colo Femoral , Fixação Interna de Fraturas , Reoperação , Humanos , Fraturas do Colo Femoral/cirurgia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Masculino , Feminino , Reoperação/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Fixação Interna de Fraturas/métodos , Fixação Interna de Fraturas/instrumentação , Idoso , Adulto Jovem , Adolescente , Seguimentos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologiaRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: There is currently a lack of in-depth comparative evaluation regarding the biomechanical properties of novel intramedullary nail devices in the treatment of basal femoral neck fractures (BFNF). This study aims to utilize finite element analysis to compare the performance differences of two novel devices with traditional PFNA and InterTan nails in the fixation of BFNF. METHODS: Based on a validated finite element model, this study constructed an accurate BFNF model and implanted four different intramedullary nail devices: PFNA, InterTan nail, PFBN (proximal femoral biomimetic nail), and NIS (novel intramedullary system). Under a vertical load of 2100N, the displacement and Von Mises stress (VMS) distribution of each group of models were evaluated through simulation testing. RESULTS: Under a load of 2100N, the PFBN device exhibited the best performance in terms of displacement and peak stress, while PFNA performed poorly. The peak displacement of the NIS device was lower than that of PFNA and InterTan nails, while the peak stress of the InterTan nail was lower than that of PFNA and NIS. CONCLUSION: The PFBN device demonstrates stronger load-bearing and shear-resistant properties in the treatment of BFNF, and the NIS device also shows significant improvement in stability. Therefore, both the PFBN and NIS devices are reliable internal fixation techniques for the treatment of CFIFs, with potential clinical application prospects.
Assuntos
Pinos Ortopédicos , Fraturas do Colo Femoral , Análise de Elementos Finitos , Fixação Intramedular de Fraturas , Humanos , Fixação Intramedular de Fraturas/instrumentação , Fixação Intramedular de Fraturas/métodos , Fraturas do Colo Femoral/cirurgia , Fraturas do Colo Femoral/fisiopatologia , Fenômenos Biomecânicos/fisiologia , Estresse Mecânico , Suporte de CargaRESUMO
Objectives: This study examines the impact of pulmonary embolism (PE) on mortality among patients with femoral neck fractures, exploring the predictive value of preoperative PE for postoperative occurrences and associated mortality over a 5-year follow-up period. Methods: We analyzed 2256 patients over 60 years old admitted with femoral neck fractures, focusing on those who developed DVT or PE postoperatively. Surgical intervention aimed within 48 hours without pharmacological thromboprophylaxis, utilizing mechanical prophylaxis instead. Postoperative management included Enoxaparin administration. Data analysis employed SPSS 21, with chi-squared tests, T-tests, and multivariate logistic regression to explore mortality and PE incidence. Results: PE was diagnosed in 1.4% of patients, with a notable mortality contrast between patients with PE (87%) and those without (59.7%) over 5 years. A history of preoperative PE emerged as a significant risk factor for postoperative PE. Despite surgical variations, no significant correlation was found between surgery type and PE incidence. Early postoperative weight-bearing and institutional rehabilitation did not significantly alter PE incidence rates. Conclusions: The study underscores the significant mortality risk associated with preoperative PE in femoral neck fracture patients. It highlights the necessity for vigilant PE risk assessment and management, challenging assumptions about the protective role of early mobility and rehabilitation in PE incidence. Further research is essential to refine patient care strategies and improve outcomes.
RESUMO
PURPOSE: Heterotopic ossification (HO) can occur after hemiarthroplasty (HA) for femoral neck fractures (FNF). This study aimed to investigate the frequency and factors contributing to the development of HO after HA. METHODS: The study included data from 92 of 183 patients (26 male and 66 female) who sustained FNF and underwent HA between April 2019 and January 2022. HO was identified on postoperative radiographic images. Patient background, operative duration, blood loss, and presence of free bone fragments immediately after surgery were compared between the HO and non-HO groups. Statistical analyses included the independent-sample t-test for continuous variables and the chi-squared test for categorical variables. A multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed using HO as an objective variable. RESULTS: HO occurred in 50 of the 92 (54%) patients. There were no statistically significant differences in patient backgrounds. Univariate analysis revealed significantly longer mean operative duration and greater blood loss in the HO group. Free bone fragments in the immediate postoperative period were observed in 29 of 50 (58%) patients in the HO group and in 3 of 42 (7.1%) patients in the non-HO group, a statistically significant difference. Logistic regression analysis revealed that the presence of free bone fragments was an independent explanatory factor for HO development. CONCLUSION: The presence of free bone fragments immediately after surgery may be significantly associated with the development of HO. Therefore, it is necessary to sufficiently remove such fragments during surgery because they may trigger HO.
Assuntos
Fraturas do Colo Femoral , Hemiartroplastia , Ossificação Heterotópica , Complicações Pós-Operatórias , Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Fraturas do Colo Femoral/cirurgia , Hemiartroplastia/efeitos adversos , Hemiartroplastia/métodos , Ossificação Heterotópica/etiologia , Ossificação Heterotópica/diagnóstico por imagem , Estudos Retrospectivos , Idoso , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Duração da Cirurgia , Perda Sanguínea Cirúrgica/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Fatores de RiscoRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Femoral neck fractures (FNF) are known to have significant morbidity and mortality rates. Multiple chronic conditions (MCC) are defined as the presence of two or more chronic diseases that greatly affect the quality of life in older adults. The aim of this study is to explore the impact of MCC and Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) on surgical outcomes in patients with FNF. METHODS: Patients with FNF who underwent joint replacement surgery were selected for this study. Patients who had two or more diseases simultaneously were divided into two groups: the MCC group and the non-MCC (NMCC) group. The CCI was calculated to assess the severity of patients' comorbidities in the MCC group. Baseline data, surgical details, and prognosis-related indicators were analyzed and compared between the two patient groups. Spearman correlation analysis was performed to assess the relationship between CCI and length of hospital stay, Harris score, skeletal muscle index (SMI), and age. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis was conducted to identify the risk factors for mortality in FNF patients at 1 and 5 years after surgery. RESULTS: A total of 103 patients were included in the MCC group, while the NMCC group consisted of 40 patients. However, the patients in the MCC group were found to be older, had a higher incidence of sarcopenia, and lower SMI values (p < 0.001). Patients in the MCC group had longer hospitalization times, lower Harris scores, higher intensive care unit (ICU) admission rates, and higher complication rates (p = 0.045, p = 0.035, p = 0.019, p = 0.010). Spearman correlation analysis revealed that CCI was positively correlated with hospitalization and age (p < 0.001, p < 0.001), while it was negatively correlated with Harris score and SMI value (p < 0.001, p < 0.001). Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis demonstrated that MCC patients had higher 1-year and 5-year mortality rates. Hospitalization time was identified as a risk factor for death in FNF patients 1 year after joint replacement (p < 0.001), whereas CCI and age were identified as risk factors for death 5 years after surgery (p < 0.001, p < 0.001). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis results showed that the difference in death time between the two groups of patients with MCC and NMCC was statistically significant (p < 0.001). Cox proportional hazard model analysis showed that CCI, age and SMI were risk factors affecting patient death. CONCLUSION: The surgical prognosis of patients with MCC, CCI and FNF is related. The higher the CCI, the worse the patient's function and the higher the long-term risk of death.
Assuntos
Comorbidade , Fraturas do Colo Femoral , Humanos , Fraturas do Colo Femoral/cirurgia , Fraturas do Colo Femoral/mortalidade , Feminino , Masculino , Idoso , Estudos Retrospectivos , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Prognóstico , Fatores de Risco , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Resultado do Tratamento , Pessoa de Meia-IdadeRESUMO
Introduction: A minority of geriatric hip fracture patients pursue non-operative treatment. Compared with surgical patients, non-operative patients have higher mortality rates. However, patient satisfaction following non-operative vs operative treatment has not been investigated extensively. The purpose of this study was to compare satisfaction among non-operatively vs operatively treated hip fracture patients. Methods: We identified patients aged 60+ years with proximal femur fractures treated over a 10-year period. Excluded were patients with isolated greater/lesser trochanteric fractures. Patients or relatives were asked to complete a 6-question survey about their treatment satisfaction. Results: Survey responses from 56 operative and 28 non-operative patients were recorded. Overall, 91.1% of operative and 82.1% of non-operative patients were satisfied with their treatment course (P = 0.260). However, only 71.4% of non-operative patients were satisfied with treatment option explanations vs 83.9% of operative patients (P = 0.014). While only 64.3% of non-operative respondents were satisfied with the ultimate treatment outcome (vs 85.7% of operative patients, P = 0.025), 89.3% of patients in each cohort would choose the same treatment plan again. Discussion: Our findings highlight the complexity of defining patient satisfaction, particularly in a geriatric hip fracture population. Unlike previous studies, we chose a direct approach to quantifying patient satisfaction by asking participants specifically about satisfaction with treatment outcome and the overall treatment course. Additional survey questions were then included to assess factors considered important in treatment satisfaction, such as health care provider treatment explanations, post-treatment mobility, and palliative care service involvement. Conclusions: We identified significant differences between non-operatively and operatively treated geriatric hip fracture patients regarding satisfaction with the explanation of treatment options, and ultimate treatment outcomes. There was no significant difference in overall satisfaction with the treatment course or likelihood of choosing the same treatment again. Further research investigating patient satisfaction following geriatric hip fracture treatment is warranted.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: The optimal treatment method for managing unstable Pauwels III femoral neck fractures remains undetermined. The aim of this study was to compare the biomechanical properties of two types of Femoral Neck Anti-rotation and Support System (FNAS) and a Femoral Neck System (FNS) in unstable Pauwels III femoral neck fractures. METHODS: Eighteen synthetic femoral models were implanted with one of three fixation devices: FNS, FNAS I, or FNAS II. An unstable Pauwels III (OTA/AO 31-B2.3) femoral neck fracture was simulated using a custom-made needle and osteotomy guide. Torsion and axial compression loading tests were conducted, and the torque, torsion angle, load to failure, displacement, and stiffness values were recorded. RESULTS: FNAS II exhibited significantly higher torsional stiffness (0.67 ± 0.10 Nm/°) compared to FNAS I (0.52 ± 0.07 Nm/°, P = 0.01) and FNS (0.54 ± 0.07 Nm/°, P = 0.005). FNS demonstrated significantly greater mean axial stiffness (239.24 ± 11.38 N/mm) than both FNAS I (179.33 ± 31.11 N/mm, P = 0.005) and FNAS II (190.07 ± 34.11 N/mm, P = 0.022). FNAS I (302.37 ± 33.88 N/mm, P = 0.001) and FNAS II (319.59 ± 50.10 N/mm, P < 0.001) showed significantly higher initial axial stiffness compared to FNS (197.08 ± 33.68 N/mm). Both FNAS I and II improved resistance to deforming forces at a load level before approximately 1000 N, which is sufficient to withstand the load from most daily life activities. No significant differences were observed in compression failure load among the groups. The failure patterns at the point of failure included the pull-out of the distal locking screw and reverse oblique intertrochanteric femur fracture for FNS, while for FNAS I and II, the failures were characterized by a cleft on the calcar femorale and a decrease in the load-displacement curve. CONCLUSIONS: In unstable Pauwels III femoral neck fractures, the FNAS II enhances stability and is easier to manage for reoperation. The results of the current study support the potential of FNAS II as an alternative option for treating unstable Pauwels III femoral neck fractures in young individuals.
Assuntos
Fraturas do Colo Femoral , Fixação Interna de Fraturas , Fraturas do Colo Femoral/cirurgia , Fenômenos Biomecânicos , Humanos , Fixação Interna de Fraturas/métodos , Fixação Interna de Fraturas/instrumentação , Rotação , Colo do Fêmur/cirurgia , Colo do Fêmur/diagnóstico por imagemRESUMO
Background: Femoral neck fractures (FNF) are one of the most common fractures, with a projected increase in incidence with population growth and ageing. The Femoral Neck System (FNS) launched in 2019 was developed specifically for fixation of FNF with the purported advantages of providing both angular and rotational stability. We report our experience with the FNS and evaluate its effectiveness and associated complications. Methods: A retrospective case series of 50 patients who underwent surgical fixation for FNF from August 2020 to October 2021 using the FNS in two Singapore tertiary institutions with at least 2 years follow-up were included. Clinical data (patients' demographics, fracture classification, intra-operative and post-operative complications) were reviewed. Radiological analysis assessed the pre- and immediate post-operative garden alignment index (GAI) and presence of femoral neck shortening at 3 months. Results: The mean age was 63.5 years (SD 16.9, range 26-92). Five (10 %), 34 (68 %) and 11 (22 %) were ASA 1, 2 and 3 respectively. Twenty-four (48 %), 16 (32 %), 4 (8 %), and 6 (12 %) patients sustained Garden's 1, 2, 3 and 4 FNF respectively. The mean operative duration was 66.2 min (SD 20.5) and length of stay was 6.9 days (SD 4.6).The post-operative improvement in garden alignment index (GAI) was a mean of 9.1° (p < 0.001) on lateral view. The mean femoral neck shortening was 1.97 mm (SD 5.3) at 3 months. There were no intra-operative complications. Post-operatively, 1 (2 %) patient required blood transfusion, 1 (2 %) patient had implant cut-out and non-union managed non-operatively, 2 (4 %) patients developed avascular necrosis and required revision to total hip replacements. There were two (4 %) cases of 1-year mortality. Conclusion: The FNS achieved good outcomes with low rates of complications. The promising results justify its continued use and further evaluation in comparison to other devices.
RESUMO
Objective: This study aims to assess the early clinical outcomes of bipolar hemiarthroplasty for treating femoral neck fractures in elderly patients aged 75 and above using the Orthopädische Chirurgie München (OCM) approach. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on a cohort of 95 elderly patients who underwent bipolar hemiarthroplasty for Garden Type III and IV femoral neck fractures between January 2020 and December 2022. The participants were categorized into two groups according to the surgical approach used: the OCM approach and the posterior-lateral approach (PLA). The average follow-up duration was 11.20 ± 2.80 months for the OCM group and 11.12 ± 2.95 months for the PLA group, with both groups ranging from 6 to 18 months. Clinical outcomes assessed included surgical duration, incision length, postoperative hospital stay, time to ambulation, hemoglobin levels, serum creatine kinase (CK) levels, C-reactive protein (CRP) levels, pain (assessed using the Visual Analogue Scale, VAS), and functional recovery (evaluated through Harris hip scores). Additionally, complications such as intraoperative and postoperative fractures, deep vein thrombosis, wound infection, nerve injury, postoperative dislocation, leg length discrepancy, and Trendelenburg gait were monitored. Results: There was no significant difference in the surgical duration between the OCM and PLA groups. However, the OCM group exhibited shorter incision lengths, reduced postoperative hospital stays, and earlier ambulation times compared to the PLA group. Significantly lower intraoperative blood loss, smaller decreases in hemoglobin levels on postoperative days 1 and 3, lesser hidden blood loss, and decreased levels of CK and CRP were observed in the OCM group. Pain levels, measured by VAS scores, were lower, and Harris hip scores, indicating functional recovery, were higher at 2 and 6 weeks postoperatively in the OCM group than in the PLA group. The incidence of complications, such as periprosthetic fractures, intramuscular venous thrombosis, hip dislocations, Trendelenburg gait, and leg length discrepancies, showed no significant differences between the groups. Conclusion: The OCM approach for bipolar hemiarthroplasty in patients aged 75 and above with femoral neck fractures offers significant early clinical benefits over the traditional PLA, including faster recovery, reduced postoperative pain, and enhanced early functional recovery.