Counseling and support services for healthcare workers in German university hospitals during the pandemic-descriptive results of a Germany-wide cross-sectional survey.

Background: Due to the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, healthcare workers (HCWs) are experiencing tremendous levels of emotional and physical stress. Hospitals are trying to help personnel cope with work-related pressure. The aim of this study was to assess HCWs' awareness and utilization of counseling and support services during the pandemic, HCWs' unmet counseling and support needs, and the type and content of these services. Methods: A cross-sectional online survey was conducted from January to June 2021 through the German national research organization Network University Medicine (NUM). All participating hospitals (6 in total) were asked to inform their employees about the study. Results: A total of 1,495 HCWs were included in the analysis. Of these, 42.8% (n = 637) were frontline HCWs (who had contact with COVID-19 patients), 23.1% (n = 344) were second-line HCWs (who only had contact with non-COVID-19 patients) and 34.1% (n = 508) had no contact with any patients. Participating hospitals offer various counseling and support services for their staff. The percentage of respondents who were unaware of available counseling and support services ranged from 5.0 to 42.0%. Depending on the type of counseling and support services, 23.0-53.6% of the respondents indicated that counseling and support services were provided but not used, while 1.7-11.6% indicated that, despite the need for them, such services were not available. HCWs' overall satisfaction with the provided counseling and support services and their unmet support needs differed by patient contact: Frontline HCWs reported more unmet needs for counseling and support than second-line HCWs, while second-line HCWs reported more unmet needs than HCWs without patient contact. Conclusion: The results indicate that hospitals should make more efforts to inform HCWs about available counseling and support services. Hospitals could also create networks where HCWs could share information about the type and content of services and their experiences with various counseling and support services. These steps would enable hospitals to respond more quickly and effectively to the problems facing HCWs during pandemics.

Psychological stress and coping strategies among frontline healthcare workers supporting patients with coronavirus disease 2019: a retrospective study and literature review.

BACKGROUND: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak might have a psychological impact on frontline healthcare workers. However, the effectiveness of coping strategies was less reported. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to investigate the sources of stress and coping strategies among frontline healthcare workers fighting against COVID-19. We also performed a literature review regarding the effects of coping methods on psychological health in this population. METHODS: We included frontline healthcare workers who completed an online survey using self-made psychological stress questionnaires in a cross-sectional study. We evaluated the association between potential factors and high-stressed status using a logistic regression model. We performed the principal component analysis with varimax rotation for factor analysis. We also performed a systematic review of published randomized controlled studies that reported the effects of coping methods on psychological health in COVID-19 healthcare workers. RESULTS: We included 107 [32 (29-36) years] respondents in the final analysis, with a response rate of 80.5%. A total of 41 (38.3%) respondents were high-stressed. Compared with the low-stressed respondents, those with high-stress were less likely to be male (46.3% versus 72.7%, p = 0.006), nurses (36.6% versus 80.3%, p < 0.001), and more likely to have higher professional titles (p = 0.008). The sources of high-stress in frontline healthcare workers were categorized into 'work factor', 'personal factor', and 'role factor'. A narrative synthesis of the randomized controlled studies revealed that most of the coping methods could improve the psychological stress in healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that some frontline healthcare workers experienced psychological stress during the early pandemic. Effective coping strategies are required to help relieve the stress in this population.

When is the use of suboptimal treatment in functionally untreatable multi-drug resistant tuberculosis morally permissible?

Multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) is well recognised as a serious threat to controlling and ending the TB epidemic. Treatment is time-intensive and costly. Current treatment guidelines recommend the use of at least four effective drugs plus pyrazinamide for a period of 18-24 months. There are, however, situations in which this is not feasible. This may be due to severe patterns of drug-resistance, poor tolerance to the medications, or supply chain issues. In this paper, I use the term functionally untreatable MDR-TB to refer to such situations. Patients may be assigned to waiting lists until appropriate medications are available, and many die while awaiting treatment. Clinicians face a serious ethical dilemma in these cases, and some may choose to treat their patients with suboptimal regimens in the interim. While this practice may alleviate symptoms and even cure some patients, it is known to extend drug-resistance, limiting further the availability of efficacious anti-TB medicines. This paper explores the relevant ethical considerations faced by clinicians providing MDR-TB treatment, and how this differs from formal ethical principles and guidance. It outlines extreme situations in which suboptimal regimens may be considered, and requisite conditions to be fulfilled by stakeholders for this to be morally permissible.