Reflecting on the Importance of Family Building and Fertility Preservation: Transgender People's Experiences with Starting Gender-Affirming Treatment as an Adolescent.

Purpose: We aimed to investigate how adults, who started gender-affirming hormone treatment during adolescence, reflect on their reproductive decisions. Methods: We recruited transgender and gender-diverse (TGD) people who visited our gender identity clinic and commenced medical treatment in adolescence at least 9 years ago. We collected data through an online survey. Results: The cohort consisted of 89 participants (66 TGD people assigned female at birth (AFAB) and 23 TGD people assigned male at birth (AMAB) with a mean age of 32.4 years (range 25.5-51.2) at the time of study, and 15.6 years (range 11.5-20.6) at the start of medical treatment. All participants initiated medical treatment before 2014, when laws requiring sterilization for legal gender recognition were still in place, and only 30% of participants reported to have received information about fertility preservation, which none of them pursued. In addition, 96% of participants underwent gonadectomy and thus became permanently infertile, which was troublesome for 27%. With today's knowledge, 44% of TGD people AFAB and 35% of TGD people born AMAB would pursue fertility preservation. The percentage of participants with a (future) desire for children increased from 34% at the start of medical treatment (at adolescent age) to 56% at the time of this study (at adult age), of whom 23% had currently started a family. Conclusion: It is important to inform transgender adolescents about the effect of medical treatment on fertility and the options for fertility preservation since many may develop a desire for (biological) children when they reach adulthood.

Transgender persons' view on previous fertility decision-making and current infertility: a qualitative study.

STUDY QUESTION: How do adult transgender and gender diverse (TGD) people, who are infertile due to prior gender-affirming treatment, view their current infertility and their reproductive decisions made in the past? SUMMARY ANSWER: In a time where sterilization was mandatory, transgender adolescents prioritized gender-affirming treatment over their future fertility and would make the same choice today despite emotional challenges related to infertility experienced by some. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Under transgender law in the Netherlands, sterilization was required for legal gender recognition until 2014, resulting in permanent infertility. The long-term consequences of this iatrogenic infertility in transgender adolescents who have now reached adulthood remain underexplored. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: Qualitative study design based on 21 in-depth one-on-one semi-structured interviews. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: TGD people in a stage of life where family planning may be a current topic were eligible for participation. They all received gender-affirming treatment in adolescence prior to the legislation change in 2014. A purposeful sampling technique was used from participants of another ongoing study. Eleven people assigned female at birth and ten people assigned male at birth were included. Interview transcripts were thematically analysed using a modified version of Braun and Clarke's six steps theory. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Six main themes were generated: (i) personal considerations regarding fertility and fertility preservation in the past; (ii) external considerations regarding fertility and fertility preservation in the past; (iii) current vision on past considerations and decisions; (iv) Current experiences and coping with infertility; (v) future family building; (vi) advice regarding fertility and fertility preservation decision-making. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: Selection, recall, and choice supportive bias may play a role in interpreting our results. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: This study highlights the importance of tailored counselling and comprehensive information on fertility preservation for transgender individuals, especially adolescents, undergoing gender-affirming treatment. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): N/A. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: N/A.

Nine Ways Parents Can Support Their Gender Diverse Children.

Parental support is associated with improved mental health outcomes for gender diverse youth (GDY). Parents often seek guidance from pediatric providers, but few studies explore what actions make GDY feel supported. Using a qualitative analysis of open-ended survey responses, we aimed to identify ways in which GDY want to be supported by their parents or caregivers. Nine key themes were identified, including using affirming language at home and other settings as desired by GDY, seeking education, and aiding in accessing affirming items and care. Findings from this study can help pediatric medical and mental health providers help parents to support their GDY.

Female Couples Undergoing IVF with Partner Eggs (Co-IVF): Pathways to Parenthood.

PURPOSE: Egg sharing in female couples can be used to allow dual participation of female couples in the pregnancy process. The oocyte donor-partner provides the eggs and the recipient partner provides the uterine environment for gestation. We present descriptive data of our experience in female couples to establish a better understanding of utilization of co-in vitro fertilization (Co-IVF) for social and medical reasons. METHODS: Female couples enrolled in a third party reproduction program that engaged in at least one Co-IVF cycle were included. Previous assisted reproductive technology (ART) cycle data, Co-IVF cycle information and pregnancy outcomes were evaluated. RESULTS: Female couples (n=21) who participated in Co-IVF cycles were analyzed. Over time, 16/21 (76%) of couples achieved at least one pregnancy, 9 (42%) couples delivered, and there are another 5 (23%) ongoing pregnancies. CONCLUSION: Our analysis presents descriptive data and sheds realistic expectations for Co-IVF couples. Co-IVF cycles can result in a shared experience with regard to the process of creating a family, while preserving a female couple's desire for dual partner participation in the gestational process. We encourage centers treating female couples to consider departing from traditional nomenclature of "donors" and "recipients" and adopting the nomenclature "Co-IVF" to describe the modern understanding of the shared experience. Even if female couples have experienced prior unsuccessful cycles, couples ultimately retain an excellent prognosis for reproductive success using Co-IVF.