Sharma's risk assessment score as a decision making tool to decide between total hip arthroplasty or hemiarthroplasty as a treatment option for elderly patients with fracture neck of femur. A prospective observational study.

Purpose: The decision to do a total hip arthroplasty (THA) or a hemiarthroplasty (HA) in an elderly with a fracture neck of femur (FNOF) is commonly based upon the surgeon's preference, pre-anesthetic fitness, hospital setup, and intensive care backup. The author devised a Sharma's risk assessment score (SRAS), based upon all the common factors that affect the surgical outcomes following FNOF in the elderly, to help orthopedic surgeons decide between THA or HA as a treatment for FNOF. Material & methods: It was a prospective observational study conducted in a tertiary-level institute. SRAS is based upon 10 parameters with each parameter having a max score of 4 and a minimum score of 1. So the maximum score a patient can score is 40 and the minimum a patient can score is 10. It was hypothesized that a patient with FNOF with a preop SRAS score >20 if subjected to a (HA) and a patient with a preop SRAS score ≤ 20 if subjected to a (THA) would have better outcomes and low complication rates. Out of Eighty-eight patients with FNOF, 7 were lost to follow-up. The remaining 81 patients with FNOF were prospectively followed between May 2018 and May 2022 and segregated into two groups THA (n = 47) and HA(n = 34) based on the SRAS. Results: The average length of follow-up was 2.6 years (6 months-4 years). The average SRAS was an average 25.7(21-32) in the HA group and 16.2 (11-20) in the THA group. Complications were seen in 12.7 % of the THA group and 17.6 % of the HA group. We had a 2.1 % 90-day mortality in the THA group and a 2.9 % 90-day mortality in the HA group. One year mortality in THA was 2.1 % and it was increased to 5.8 % in the HA group. Conclusion: SRAS is a useful decision-making tool that would guide surgeons to decide between THA or HA as a treatment option for elderly FNOF and would help minimize post-operative complications and reduce mortality. Level 3 study: Prospective observational study.

Preserving medial iliofemoral ligament avoids excessive leg lengthening in total hip arthroplasty using anterolateral-supine approach.

Background: In this study, we compared postoperative leg length discrepancy (LLD) after total hip arthroplasty using the anterolateral-supine approach (ALSA THA) with or without medial iliofemoral ligament (mILFL) preservation and examined the effect of the remaining mILFL on postoperative LLD. Methods: This was a single-center, retrospective case control study. Unilateral primary THA with a preoperative LLD <15 mm, in which the contralateral side was intact, was included. After ALSA THA, we compared the absolute values of postoperative LLDs and examined the ratio of postoperative LLD >5 mm with and without mILFL preservation. Demographic data, clinical scores, and operative data were collected. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. Results: We included 341 hips (preservation group: 283 hips; resection group: 58 hips). The mean (range) absolute values of the postoperative LLDs were 2.3 (0-15.9) mm and 3.4 (0-14.8) mm, respectively. There was no significant difference between the two groups (p = 0.36). The proportion of postoperative LLD >5 mm differed significantly between the groups (4.4 % and 20.0 %, respectively; p < 0.01). Multiple logistic regression analysis showed that resection of the mILFL was the only significant factor that caused excessive leg lengthening (odds ratio, 5.28; 95 % confidence interval, 2.12-13.10, p < 0.01). Significant differences were reported in surgical time (81 (38-132) and 96 (54-157), respectively; p < 0.01) and intraoperative blood loss (297 (50-1170) and 388 (100-1150), respectively; p < 0.01). However, no significant differences in clinical scores, dislocation (including instability), or reoperation rates were observed between the two groups. Conclusion: In patients with a preoperative LLD <15 mm, preserving the mILFL in ALSA THA avoids excessive leg lengthening and may lead to shorter LLD without any difficulties.

Greater readmission rates after total hip arthroplasty with discharge to a facility vs. home: A propensity score matched analysis.

Purpose: Provided that total hip arthroplasties (THA) are some of the most common surgical procedures performed, there is a necessity to understand all factors that contribute to risks of adverse outcomes postoperatively and to find solutions to avoid these events with preventive measures. This retrospective cohort study sought to assess differences in (1) postoperative complication rates, (2) readmission rates and reasons, and (3) demographic variables that contribute to readmissions based on discharge destination within the first 30 days after a THA. Methods: Patients undergoing THA (27130) between 2015 and 2020 were extracted from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) database based on procedural codes. Propensity score matching was then employed to reduce selection bias, and Chi-square tests and one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) were performed. Multivariable analysis was then used to look for other factors associated with readmission risk. Results: 219,960 patients were identified with 189,841 discharged to home, 19,355 to a skilled nursing facility (SNF), and 10,764 to a rehabilitation facility. The rehabilitation and SNF cohorts both had greater rates of readmission (4.56 % home vs. 6.88 % SNF vs. 6.90 % rehabilitation, P<0.001) and any adverse event (AAE, 9.02 % vs. 18 % vs. 21.3 %, P<0.001) after matching. Older age, longer operative time, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification four, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), bleeding disorders, steroid use, and smoking were associated with an increased risk of readmission after THA. Conclusion: Overall, THAs were shown to have low postoperative complications and readmissions in all patient populations despite differences in discharge destination which continues to demonstrate the safety and validity of this often elective procedure. However, the statistically significant risk of complications and readmissions in addition to the higher costs associated should be accounted for when considering patient discharges to a non-home facility.

Mitigating calcar fracture risk with automated impaction during total hip arthroplasty.

Background: Automated broaching has recently been introduced for total hip arthroplasty (THA), with the goal of improving surgical efficiency and reducing surgeon workload. While studies have suggested that this technique may improve femoral sizing and alignment, little has been published regarding its safety, particularly with regard to calcar fractures. The purpose of our study was to evaluate the risk of calcar fracture during automated broaching, and to determine if this risk can be mitigated. Methods: We queried our prospective institutional database and identified 1596 unilateral THAs performed by the senior author using automated impaction between 2019 and 2023. We identified the incidence of calcar fracture with automated impaction, and whether the fracture occurred during broaching or stem insertion. We additionally determined calcar fracture incidence within two consecutive subgroups of patients using different stem insertion techniques; subgroup (1): automated broaching with automated stem insertion for all patients; versus subgroup (2): automated broaching with automated stem insertion ONLY if a cushion of cancellous bone separated the broach from the calcar, otherwise the stem was placed manually. Continuous and categorical variables were analyzed with Student's t-test and Fisher's exact test, respectively. Results: Seventeen calcar fractures occurred intraoperatively (1.1 %). Only two fractures occurred during automated broaching (0.1 %), while fifteen occurred during final stem impaction (0.9 %) (p = 0.007). Four calcar fractures (1.4 %) occurred in subgroup 1, compared to two in subgroup 2 (0.6 %) (p = 0.28). Conclusions: Our study found a calcar fracture incidence of 1.1 % using automated impaction, consistent with historically reported rates of 0.4-3.7 %. We found that calcar fractures are more likely to occur during stem insertion than during femoral broaching. We recommend that if any part of the final broach is in direct contact with the calcar, the final stem should be impacted manually to minimize fracture risk.

Short-term outcomes with routine use of size ≥40 femoral heads in THA: A retrospective cohort study.

Background: Using larger femoral heads during total hip arthroplasty (THA) may result in a more stable hip. Greater volumetric wear and frictional torque, however, may result in increased postoperative complications. The purpose of this study was to compare outcomes of patients with femoral head size ≥40 mm compared to those with femoral head size <40 mm. Materials and methods: A retrospective chart review of 504 THAs performed by a single surgeon at a single institution from 2009 to 2016 was conducted. Following exclusions, 131 THAs were identified with femoral heads ≥40 mm and 348 THAs were identified with femoral heads <40 mm. In addition to demographic data, all postoperative complications were recorded. Plain radiographs were used to rule out/in periprosthetic osteolysis and/or acetabular loosening. Chi-square tests and Student's t-tests were used to compare categorical and continuous variables, respectively. Results: Mean follow-up period for the entire cohort was 5.5 years. Complications with ≥40 mm femoral heads included 1 superficial infection and 1 deep periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). There were no cases of dislocation, osteolysis, acetabular loosening, or trunnionosis. In contrast, complications with <40 mm femoral heads included 9 dislocations and 7 PJIs. Conclusion: The routine use of large femoral heads (≥40-mm) during THA appears to be a safe option for patients at short-term clinical follow-up. Notably, 0 patients had a clinical course complicated by dislocation, osteolysis, acetabular loosening, or trunnionosis. Level of evidence: Level III Retrospective Cohort Study.

Unexpected positive cultures in conversion hip and knee arthroplasty.

PURPOSE: Total hip and knee arthroplasty in patients with previous history of periarticular surgery, such as osteosynthesis, can be surprisingly complex. This type of procedure is known as conversion arthroplasty (cTHA or cTKA) and has a higher risk of complications. The rates of unexpected positive cultures (UPC) and the risk of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) compared to primary arthroplasty is unclear. The main purpose of this study was to evaluate rates of Unexpected Positive Cultures (UPC) in a series of conversion arthroplasty patients. The main questions to answer are: 1. Are the patients with conversion arthroplasties more susceptible to UPC than other causes of revision arthroplasties? 2. Are the conversion patients with UPC more susceptible to developing PJI? METHODS: This was a retrospective review of patients submitted to cTHA and cTKA from January 2012 to September 2018. Patients with history of previous infection or with missing intraoperative cultures were excluded. The UPC was defined as a single positive culture obtained during a procedure previously considered aseptic and PJI was defined according to the 2018 ICM criteria. After excluding 141 cases, 205 patients were analyzed, 160 hips and 45 knees. RESULTS: Nine (4.4%) UPC were identified, five (3.1%) in the hip group and four (8,9%) in the knee group. Staphylococcal species were the most common isolated bacteria (n = 7, 77.7%). During the study period, four (1,9%) patients were diagnosed with PJI. Only one case had an UPC and a different germ was identified during revision arthroplasty workup. CONCLUSIONS: While UPC are more prevalent in conversion knee arthroplasties compared to conversion hip arthroplasties, the rates are similar to those observed in revision arthroplasty for other indications. Importantly, the presence of a UPC in conversion arthroplasty does not appear to elevate the risk of subsequent periprosthetic joint infection, provided a thorough PJI workup has been conducted preoperatively. Therefore, in such cases, UPCs may be safely disregarded.

Robotic-assisted total hip arthroplasty outperforms manual technique in obese and overweight patients: a prospective comparative study.

BACKGROUND: With the increasing prevalence of obesity, there is growing awareness of the impact of overweight and obesity on total hip arthroplasty (THA). Research exploring the accuracy of acetabular component orientation in THA between robotic-assisted and manual techniques across different BMI categories is insufficient. METHODS: This prospective study evaluated 221 patients who underwent THA with a Robotic Interactive Orthopaedic Arm system and 252 patients who underwent manual THA between March 2022 and January 2024. The patients were divided into four groups according to their BMI. We analysed whether there were differences in the accuracy of acetabular component positioning between robotic-assisted THA and manual THA across different BMI categories. RESULTS: In the overweight group, robotic-assisted THA achieved a significantly higher rate of abductions within the target range (73/6) than manual THA (62/28) (p = 0.000). Both abductions and anteversions within the target range were also significantly more frequent in the robotic-assisted THA group (69/10) than in the manual THA group (56/34) (p = 0.000). Among the obese patients, robotic-assisted THA showed a perfect record for anteversions within the target range (29/0), markedly outperforming manual THA (39/6) (p = 0.040). CONCLUSION: In the overweight (24 kg/m² ≤ BMI < 28 kg/m²) and obese (BMI ≥ 28 kg/m²) groups, robotic-assisted THA demonstrates significantly greater accuracy in acetabular component positioning compared to manual THA. This indicates that robotic-assisted technology may provide a more precise positioning of the acetabular component in overweight and obese patients.

Severe heterotopic ossification after total hip arthroplasty in male patients under 70 years of age: effectiveness of prophylactic protocol.

BACKGROUND: This study aims to evaluate the incidence of clinically significant heterotopic ossification (HO) in primary total hip arthroplasty (THA), comparing outcomes with and without the adoption of an HO prophylactic protocol in male patients under 70 years of age. METHODS: The prophylactic protocol involved the administration of 50 mg of Indomethacin twice daily for 3 weeks. HO presence was classified according to the Brooker classification system, considering "severe" clinically significant HO (Brooker grade 3 and 4). RESULTS: Two hundred and seventy-nine patients were included in our study, and an overall HO rate of 68.2% versus a rate of 61.5% was found respectively in patients not subjected and subjected to prophylactic protocol, without significant difference (PR 0.062). However, patients not subjected to the HO prophylactic protocol exhibited a severe HO rate of 22.4% compared to 7.7% in the prophylactic group, with a statistically significant difference (P = 0.008). CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrated that prophylactic protocol adoption is significantly associated with lower rate of severe HO in male patients under 70 years of age. Currently, there are no orthopedic guidelines for the prevention and management of HO after THA, but in the absence of contraindications, the adoption of a prophylactic protocol for HO should always be considered in high-risk patients.

Usefulness of a Cementless Highly-Porous Acetabular Cup in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients Undergoing Total Hip Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Total hip arthroplasty in patients with rheumatoid arthritis is difficult and leads to worse implant survival and higher risk for complications compared to osteoarthritis. Poor periacetabular bone quality might challenge the stability of the acetabular cup. Contemporary 3D-printed highly-porous titanium cup designs have become the benchmark for cementless implants; however, their usefulness in rheumatoid arthritis is still unclear. The purpose of this study was to assess the short-term results of the use of a highly-porous 3D-printed acetabular titanium cup in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We studied a consecutive series of RA patients who underwent cementless THA between 2019 and 2020 in our center with the same 3D-printed highly-porous titanium acetabular cup. All patients were evaluated prospectively for a minimum 3-year follow-up with the Harris hip score, VAS and Roles and Maudsley score. Radiographic assessment focused on evidence of cup osseointegration. RESULTS: 37 RA patients, mean age at surgery of 51.3 years, were included. Mean follow-up was 3.2 years (3 to 4 years). By the last follow-up visit, the Harris hip score had increased significantly from 37.8 to 88.5, VAS had decreased from 6.1 to 1.0 and excellent satisfaction for 31 patients. All 5 Moore's radiographic signs were present in 35 hips, with only 4 signs present in the remaining 2 hips, thus indicating complete osseointegration of all cups. There were no complications on the acetabular side but one intraoperative proximal calcar fracture. CONCLUSION: 3D-printed highly porous implants used in primary THA worked well in patients with rheumatoid arthritis, showing excellent osseointegration and good clinical results in the short term.

Hip Osteoarthritis-Clinical-Statistical Study and Surgical Treatment.

Osteoarthritis (OA) of the hip, also known as coxarthrosis, is a degenerative disease marked by gradual biomechanics alterations cause by articular cartilage damage in the coxofemural joint. The goal of this study was determining the incidence of patients with hip osteoarthritis who undergo surgery (hip arthroplasty) within the Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology of the Emergency County Hospital of Drobeta-Turnu Severin, hospitalized between January 2014 and December 2019. Furthermore, we proposed gathering details about incidence, distribution according to age group, gender, living conditions, and type of arthroplasty used in studied patient group. The study included 485 patients with hip OA mainly diagnosed in elderly patients, 87.83% being over 60 years old. In terms of gender, the disease primarily impacted women, with a female/male ratio of 2/1.

Accuracy of robotic arm-assisted versus computed tomography-based navigation in total hip arthroplasty using the direct anterior approach: a retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: A robotic arm-assisted and a computed tomography (CT)- based navigation system have been reported to improve the accuracy of component positioning in total hip arthroplasty (THA). However, no study has compared robotic arm-assisted THA (rTHA) to CT-based navigated THA (nTHA) concerning accuracy of cup placement and acetabular fractures using the direct anterior approach (DAA). This study aimed to compare the accuracy of cup placement and the presence of intraoperative acetabular fractures between rTHA and nTHA using DAA in the supine position. METHODS: We retrospectively investigated 209 hips of 188 patients who underwent rTHA or nTHA using DAA (rTHA using the Mako system: 85 hips of 79 patients; nTHA: 124 hips of 109 patients). After propensity score matching for age and sex, each group consisted of 73 hips. We evaluated clinical and radiographic outcomes, comparing postoperative cup orientation and position, measured using a three-dimensional templating software, to preoperative CT planning. Additionally, we investigated the prevalence of occult acetabular fracture. RESULTS: Clinical outcomes were not significantly different between the groups at 1 year postoperatively. The mean absolute error of cup orientation was significantly smaller in the rTHA group than in nTHA (inclination: 1.4° ± 1.2° vs. 2.7° ± 2.2°, respectively; p = 0.0001, anteversion: 1.5° ± 1.3° vs. 2.2° ± 1.7°, respectively; p = 0.007). The cases within an absolute error of 5 degrees in both RI and RA were significantly higher in the rTHA (97.3%) than in nTHA group (82.2%) (p = 0.003). The absolute error of the cup position was not significantly different between the two groups. The prevalence of occult acetabular fracture did not differ significantly between the two groups (rTHA: n = 0 [0%] vs. nTHA: n = 1 [1.4%]). CONCLUSION: Cup placement using DAA in the supine position in rTHA was more accurate with fewer outliers compared to nTHA. Therefore, rTHA performed via DAA in a supine position would be useful for accurate cup placement.

Timing of total joint arthroplasty post-COVID-19: an evaluation of the optimal window to minimize perioperative risks.

BACKGROUND: Total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) are commonly performed orthopedic procedures. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of COVID-19 status on postoperative complications and mortality in patients undergoing THA and TKA. METHODS: A total of 110,186 underwent either THA or TKA. Patients were grouped based on their COVID-19 status, gathered from the National COVID-19 Cohort Collaborative (N3C) in the 12 weeks preceding surgery and compared for various variables, including age, sex, BMI, and Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) scores. COVID-19 status was defined as a positive test result that was closest to the date of surgery regardless of testing positive previously. Postoperative complications such as venous thromboembolism (VTE), sepsis, surgical site infection, bleeding, acute kidney injury (AKI), 30-day, and 1-year all-cause mortality were examined. To compare the variables, an odds ratio with a 95% confidence interval was calculated with a significant level set at P < 0.05. Logistic regression using R programming was utilized for these calculations. RESULTS: Univariate analysis was performed and rates of VTE (1.02% vs. 3.35%), 30-day mortality (0.25% vs. less than 5%), and 1-year mortality (1.42% vs. 5.43%) were higher in the COVID-19-positive group for THA patients (P < 0.001). For TKA patients, only 30-day mortality was significantly higher in the COVID-19-positive group (P = 0.034). Multivariate logistic regression revealed that a positive COVID-19 diagnosis within two weeks of surgery and a CCI score > 3 were significant predictors of postoperative complications and mortality for both TKA and THA. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with a positive COVID-19 diagnosis within 12 weeks of THA or TKA carried a significantly higher risk for postoperative complications and mortality. In addition, a CCI score > 3 is also a significant risk factor. These findings emphasize the importance of vigilant preoperative screening and risk stratification in the era of COVID-19.

Is pericapsular nerve group block superior to other regional analgesia techniques following total hip arthroplasty? a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: A systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA) to compare the safety and efficacy of pericapsular nerve group block (PENGB) with other regional analgesia techniques in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA). METHODS: We searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library for relevant research from inception to May, 2024. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing PENGB with other regional analgesia techniques in patients undergoing THA were included. The primary outcome was resting pain scores at 6 h after surgery. The NMA was made by using Stata 15.1 software. Potential risk of bias was assessed by using CINeMA. Sensitivity and subgroup analyses were performed on the primary outcome. RESULTS: A total of 11 RCTs including 766 patients were eligible for inclusion. For postoperative resting and movement pain scores within 24 h analysis, PENGB + periarticular local anesthetic infiltration (PLAI) was found to be significantly more effective than other treatments and its Surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) was the lowest. Moreover, PENGB + PLAI was ranked the best in reducing opioid consumption within 24 h and the length of hospital stay. PENGB was found to have significantly lower incidence of quadriceps motor block and postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV). CONCLUSIONS: PENGB is more likely to reduce the incidence of quadriceps motor block and PONV in patients undergoing THA, but PENGB + PLAI is superior to other regional analgesia techniques (PLAI, PENGB, fascia iliaca compartment block, and quadratus lumborum block) in improving postoperative pain and shortening the length of hospital stay. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42024538421.

Outcomes of Hip Arthroplasty in Patients with Preoperative Thrombocytopenia.

Background: Thrombocytopenia is a condition where platelet counts are below the normal range (< 150 × 103/µL), resulting in a higher risk of bleeding and affecting the results of hip arthroplasty. We assessed the impact of preoperative platelet counts on the clinical results of patients who underwent hip arthroplasty. Methods: Between April 2003 and March 2023, 437 patients (451 hips), who had preoperative thrombocytopenia of less than 150 × 103/µL platelets, underwent hip arthroplasty. Preoperative platelet levels were categorized into severe thrombocytopenia (< 50 × 103/µL) and non-severe thrombocytopenia (50-149 × 103/µL). Total blood loss, operation time, requirement of transfusion, amount of transfusion, duration of surgical wound oozing, length of hospital stay, mortality rate at 1 year after surgery, and any complication were compared between the 2 groups. Results: No notable differences were observed in the surgery time or the total amount of blood loss between the groups. The requirement of transfusion and the amount of transfused blood were higher in the severe thrombocytopenia group. Prolonged oozing was found in around 18% in both groups, while periprosthetic joint infections occurred in 3 of the non-severe thrombocytopenia group. No significant difference was noted in the duration of hospital stay (25.6 ± 18.3 days vs. 19.4 ± 16.6 days, p = 0.067) and 1-year mortality (22.2% vs. 11.8%, p = 0.110). Conclusions: Hip arthroplasties are safe for patients with low platelet counts and do not lead to prolonged hospital stays. On the other hand, patients with severe thrombocytopenia tend to need blood transfusions more frequently than those with less severe thrombocytopenia.

A Comparison of Postoperative Outcomes Between Supine and Lateral Patient Positioning in Total Hip Arthroplasty Using the Anterior-Based Muscle Sparing Surgical Approach.

Background: To determine any differences in clinical outcomes between patients in the supine vs the lateral position during anterior-based muscle sparing (ABMS) total hip arthroplasty (THA). Methods: A retrospective review was performed of 368 patients undergoing THA via the ABMS approach (201 lateral vs 167 supine position) at our institution (2015-2019) with a minimum follow-up of 12 months. Inclusion criteria were all patients undergoing primary THA. Exclusion criteria were any revision surgeries and patients who did not undergo the ABMS THA. Outcomes assessed were postoperative complication rates, ambulation distance, length of stay, and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index pain, stiffness, and physical function scores at 3 time periods (preoperative, 3 months postoperative, and 1 year postoperative). Results: The supine group had significantly greater postoperative day 0 ambulation distance (150 vs 60 meters; P < .001), while no difference was observed on postoperative day 1 (210 meters in supine vs 200 in lateral; P = .921). Median length of stay was significantly shorter in the supine group (1; interquartile range 0-1) with respect to the lateral group (1; interquartile range 0-2; P < .001). The in-hospital complication rates (2.4% in supine vs 1.5% in lateral; P = .780), return to operating room rates (2.4% in supine vs 1.5% in lateral; P = .780), and readmission rates (5.4% in supine vs 5.0% in lateral; P = .631) were not significantly different between the groups. No significant differences were observed across any Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index scores. Conclusions: Both supine and lateral patient positioning provide acceptable early surgical outcomes, suggesting that satisfactory results can be obtained via both positions in THAs.

Liver Disease Increases the Risk of Postoperative Complications in Patients Undergoing Aseptic Revision Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty.

Background: Due to the multiorgan effects of liver disease, surgical patients with liver disease have an increased risk of perioperative complications. With revision total hip and knee arthroplasty surgeries increasing, it is important to determine the effects of liver disease in this patient population. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of underlying liver disease on postoperative outcomes following revision total joint arthroplasty (TJA). Methods: The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was used to identify patients undergoing aseptic revision TJA from 2006-2019 and group them based on liver disease. The presence of liver disease was assessed by calculating the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease-Sodium score. Patients with a Model for End-Stage Liver Disease-Sodium score of > 10 were classified as having underlying liver disease. In this analysis, differences in demographics, comorbidities, and postoperative complications were assessed. Results: Of 7102 patients undergoing revision total hip arthroplasty, 11.6% of the patients had liver disease. Of 8378 patients undergoing revision total knee arthroplasty, 8.4% of the patients had liver disease. Following adjustment on multivariable regression analysis, patients with liver disease undergoing revision total hip arthroplasty or revision total knee arthroplasty had an increased risk of major complications, wound complications, septic complications, bleeding requiring transfusion, extended length of stay, and readmission compared to those without liver disease. Conclusions: Patients with liver disease have an increased risk of complications following revision TJA. A multidisciplinary team approach should be employed for preoperative optimization and postoperative management of these vulnerable patients to improve outcomes and decrease the incidence and severity of complications. Level of evidence: This is retrospective cohort study and is level 3 evidence.

Assessing the Reliability of Postoperative Cross-Table Radiographs Compared to CT Scans for Measuring Acetabular Anteversion Angle Following Total Hip Arthroplasty.

AIM: This study aimed to evaluate acetabular anteversion following total hip arthroplasty (THA) using cross-table lateral radiographs and CT scans and to determine the reliability of cross-table lateral radiographs compared to computed tomography (CT) scans for measuring acetabular anteversion. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study of patients undergoing THA at Justice K.S. Hegde Charitable Hospital, Deralakatte, Mangalore, from January 2020 to June 2021. Radiographs are typically taken in both anteroposterior (AP) and lateral views after THA. However, for this study, a cross-table lateral view was used instead of the usual lateral radiograph to measure the angle of anteversion. The anteversion was calculated using the method described by Woo and Morrey. Additionally, CT scans were performed on all patients as part of the study protocol. The anteversion measured in these scans was compared to that in the cross-table radiographs to assess the latter's reliability for routine use. The risk of radiation exposure from CT scans was minimized by adhering to the ALARA (As Low as Reasonably Achievable) principle, with only axial sections of the acetabular cup being scanned. RESULTS:  The results show that the radiographic acetabular anteversion and CT scan measurements have a mean difference of 0.3036. There is a positive correlation between these measurements. The p-value is not statistically significant (p=0.698). Therefore, the measurements are correlated with each other with a linear relationship (r=0.919). For anteversion measurements using the X-ray method, the mean was 27.16 degrees with a standard deviation of ±9.49. The median was 27.26 degrees, ranging from 10.27 to 42.58 degrees. In comparison, the CT method yielded a mean anteversion of 27.40 degrees with a standard deviation of ±8.50 degrees. The median was 27.64 degrees, ranging from 12.35 to 43.11 degrees. CONCLUSION: Cross-table lateral radiographs are a reliable and comparable method to CT scans for measuring acetabular anteversion following total hip arthroplasty.

Acetabular Bone Cement Extension Leading to Bladder Obstruction: An Orthopedic Surgical Complication.

Polymethyl methacrylate, commonly known as bone cement, is widely used for implant fixation in orthopedic and trauma surgery due to its excellent adhesive properties and biocompatibility. However, complications such as bone cement extrusion, although rare, can lead to significant morbidity. We present the case of an 86-year-old Hispanic female who presented to the emergency department (ED) with tachycardia, hypertension, and respiratory distress. Her medical history included Parkinson's disease, hiatal hernia, osteoarthritis, colon cancer, and a complex post-hip fracture surgical history. Despite being bedridden, she had been previously in stable health. A computed tomography (CT) scan revealed a significant hiatal hernia, minimal remaining left lung tissue, a right lung nodule, hydronephrosis, and a large radiopaque mass in the right pelvis extending from the acetabular area. This radiopaque mass was later determined to be bone cement, with a portion extruding into the bladder. The patient was diagnosed with sepsis secondary to a urinary tract infection and hyponatremia; a urology consultation recommended a conservative approach to avoid potential antibiotic resistance. This case report highlights a rare complication of total hip arthroplasty involving bone cement extrusion into the bladder, which led to hydronephrosis and a urinary tract infection (UTI). Although such complications can be asymptomatic, they should be considered in patients with a history of arthroplasty.

Deciphering Complexity: Atypical Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome Unraveled in the Wake of Elective Hip Arthroplasty.

Atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome (aHUS) is a rare and complex disease characterized by microangiopathic hemolytic anemia, thrombocytopenia, and acute renal failure. This case report details the clinical presentation, diagnosis, and management of a 49-year-old female who developed aHUS following elective hip arthroplasty. The patient, with a history of cardiovascular events and no prior renal disease, presented with elevated LDH levels, thrombocytopenia, and acute renal failure on the first postoperative day. A diagnostic workup confirmed aHUS, and the patient was successfully treated with therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) and hemodialysis. The case underscores the importance of early recognition and aggressive management of aHUS, especially in the perioperative setting, and highlights the need for a multidisciplinary approach to optimize patient outcomes. Through this case, we aim to raise awareness about the potential for surgical stress to trigger aHUS and emphasize the critical role of TPE and supportive care in the treatment of this rare condition.