RESUMO
To confirm target engagement of hits from our high-throughput screening efforts, we ran biophysical assays on several hundreds of hits from 15 different high-throughput screening campaigns. Analyzing the biophysical assay results from these screening campaigns led us to conclude that we could be more strategic in our biophysical analysis of hits by first confirming activity in a thermal shift assay (TSA) and then confirming activity in either a surface plasmon resonance (SPR) assay or a temperature-related intensity change (TRIC) assay. To understand how this new workflow shapes the quality of the final hits, we compared TSA/SPR or TSA/TRIC confirmed and unconfirmed hits to one another using four measures of compound quality: quantitative estimate of drug-likeness (QED), Pan-Assay Interference Compounds (PAINS), promiscuity, and aqueous solubility. In general, we found that the biophysically confirmed hits performed better in the compound quality metrics than the unconfirmed hits, demonstrating that our workflow not only confirmed target engagement of the hits but also enriched for higher quality hits.
Assuntos
Descoberta de Drogas , Ensaios de Triagem em Larga Escala , Bibliotecas de Moléculas Pequenas , Ressonância de Plasmônio de Superfície , Fluxo de Trabalho , Ensaios de Triagem em Larga Escala/métodos , Bibliotecas de Moléculas Pequenas/química , Descoberta de Drogas/métodos , HumanosRESUMO
Small-molecule screening is a powerful approach to identify modulators of either specific biological targets or cellular pathways with phenotypic endpoints. A myriad of assay technologies are available to assess the activity of enzymes, monitor protein-protein interactions, measure transcription factor activity in reporter assays, or detect cellular features and activities using high-content imaging. A common challenge during small-molecule screening is, however, the presence of hit compounds generating assay interference, thereby producing false-positive hits. Thus, efforts are needed to uncover such interferences to prioritize high-quality hits for further analysis. This process encompasses (1) computational approaches to flag undesirable compounds, and (2) the use of experimental approaches like counter, orthogonal, and cellular fitness screens to identify and eliminate artifacts. In this brief guide, we provide an overview for first-time users, highlighting experimental screening strategies to prioritize high-quality bioactive hits from high-throughput screening/high-content screening (HTS/HCS) campaigns.
Assuntos
Descoberta de Drogas/métodos , Ensaios de Triagem em Larga Escala/métodos , Bibliotecas de Moléculas Pequenas , Descoberta de Drogas/normas , Ensaios de Triagem em Larga Escala/normas , HumanosRESUMO
Hits from high-throughput screening (HTS) assays are typically evaluated using cheminformatics and/or empirical approaches before a decision for follow-up (activity confirmation and/or sample resynthesis) is made. However, the compound integrity (i.e., identity and purity) of these hits often remains largely unknown at this stage, since many compounds in the screening collection could undergo various changes such as degradation, polymerization, and precipitation during storage over time. When compound integrity is actually assessed for HTS hits postassay to address this issue, the process often increases the overall cycle time by weeks due to the reacquisition of the samples and the lengthy liquid chromatography-ultraviolet/mass spectrometric analysis time. Here we present a novel approach where compound integrity data are collected concurrently with the concentration-response curve (CRC) stage of HTS, with both assays occurring either in parallel on two distributions from the same liquid sample or serially using the original source liquid sample. The rapid generation of compound integrity data has been enabled by a high-speed ultra-high-pressure liquid chromatography-ultraviolet/mass spectrometric platform capable of analyzing ~2000 samples per instrument per week. From this parallel approach, both compound integrity and CRC potency results for screening hits become available to medicinal chemists at the same time, which has greatly enhanced the decision-making process for hit follow-up and progression. In addition, the compound integrity results from recent hits provide a real-time and representative "snapshot" of the sample integrity of the entire compound collection, and the data can be used for in-depth analyses of the screening collection.