Three-year analysis of results, safety and progression in patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension, undertaking trabecular microsurgery.

AIM: To evaluate the efficacy, safety, structural and functional progression following the insertion of iStent inject ® implants in patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension at a tertiary-level hospital. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective study included 98 eyes (57 males and 41 females) with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension, which underwent iStent inject W® implantation (Glaukos, Corporation, CA) between December 2018 and December 2022. Differences in intraocular pressure (IOP), the number of hypotensive eye drops used, and structural and functional tests were assessed between preoperative values and subsequent reviews during a follow-up period of one (n = 98), two (n = 55), and three years (n = 15) after surgery. RESULTS: Among the 98 eyes studied, 85% were diagnosed with open-angle glaucoma (50% mild, 32% moderate, and 18% severe) and 15% with ocular hypertension. There was a statistically significant reduction in IOP compared to preoperative values for all visits except the 1-month (p = 0.36) and 3-year (p = 0.39) visits. Visual acuity increased from 0.39 ±â€¯0.25 to 0.72 ±â€¯0.24 (p < 0.01), considering that a significant portion of the interventions included cataract surgery. Before surgery, 66% of the sample used 2 or more hypotensive medications. Post-surgery, the number of hypotensive medications decreased (from 1.88 ±â€¯0.84 to 0.21 ±â€¯0.59 at 3 years) (p < 0.01), with an 88.9% reduction in the number of medications over three years. After surgery, 75% of cases did not require any medication. Regarding structural and functional tests, thickness of retinal nerve fiber layers (RNFL (p = 0.35), excavation / papilla ratio E/P (p = 0.31), visual function index (VFI (p = 0.06), and deviation mean (MD (p = 0.06) showed no statistically significant differences post-intervention. However, standard deviation of the pattern (DSM) did exhibit differences, decreasing from 5.46 ±â€¯4.03 dB to 5.34 ±â€¯3.48 dB (p = 0.02). CONCLUSION: The results of this study suggest that the iStent inject W® technique constitutes an effective and safe option for tension control and glaucoma treatment.

Ten-Year Effectiveness and Safety of Trabecular Micro-Bypass Stent Implantation with Cataract Surgery in Patients with Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension.

INTRODUCTION: This study evaluated 10-year results of implanting one iStent trabecular micro-bypass stent during cataract surgery in eyes with open-angle glaucoma (OAG) or ocular hypertension. METHODS: This retrospective, non-randomized study examined 10-year outcomes of iStent trabecular micro-bypass stent implantation with cataract surgery by one surgeon in eyes with OAG [including primary OAG (POAG) and pseudoexfoliative glaucoma (PXG)] or ocular hypertension at a multi-specialty German ophthalmology center. Study visits were conducted preoperatively and at 2.5, 3, 5, and 10 years postoperatively; examinations included intraocular pressure (IOP), medications, corrected-distance visual acuity (CDVA), and adverse events. RESULTS: A total of 63 eyes of 45 patients with OAG (n = 60 eyes) or ocular hypertension (n = 3 eyes) and data through 10 years were analyzed. Mean preoperative IOP was 18.6 ± 4.4 mmHg on 1.83 ± 1.03 mean medications. At study visits through 10 years postoperative, mean IOP reduced by 12.9-19.0% (p < 0.005 at all points), and mean medication burden reduced by 37.8-51.4% (p ≤ 0.006 at all points). At 10 years postoperatively, 77.8% of eyes had IOP ≤ 18 mmHg and 47.6% had IOP ≤ 15 mmHg (vs. 50.8% and 25.4% preoperatively, respectively; p = 0.016). One-third (33.3%) of eyes were medication-free vs. 3.2% preoperatively (p < 0.001); 17.5% were on 2-5 medications (vs. 55.6% preoperatively, p = 0.005); and 93.7% of eyes were on the same or fewer medications vs. preoperative. Post-phacoemulsification CDVA improvement was maintained; no filtering surgeries were completed over 10-year follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Significant and safe IOP and medication reductions were observed through 10 years after iStent implantation with cataract surgery in patients with OAG or ocular hypertension.

Outcomes of iStent inject combined with cataract surgery in Asian eyes: Australian data from the Fight Glaucoma Blindness international registry.

PURPOSE: To analyse real-world outcomes in Asian eyes of iStent inject, a second-generation trabecular micro-bypass stent, combined with phacoemulsification. METHODS: This is a multi-centre, observational study of glaucomatous Asian eyes that have undergone iStent inject implantation combined with cataract surgery. Patient data were extracted from the Fight Glaucoma Blindness! Registry. Outcome measures included those of IOP reduction, glaucoma medication reduction, and adverse events including the need for secondary surgery. RESULTS: 123 eyes of 86 patients with a mean age of 68.4 ± 9.3 years underwent iStent inject implantation with phacoemulsification. At baseline, the mean ± SD preoperative intraocular pressure (IOP) was 16.0 ± 4.4 mmHg, and the mean preoperative number of topical glaucoma medications was 1.9 ± 1.4. At 12 months 30.8% of eyes demonstrated a reduction in IOP greater than 20%, the mean IOP reduction was 12.5% with an additional reduction of 0.7 glaucoma medications. 40% of eyes were using no medications at 12 months compared to 16.3% preoperatively. 8.2% of eyes required a subsequent procedure within the 12-month follow-up window. CONCLUSION: iStent inject implantation combined with phacoemulsification in Asian eyes showed a reduction of IOP and glaucoma medication use in a real-world clinical setting. The safety profile of the device is good with minimal adverse outcomes, however, a subset of patients required secondary procedures within the 12 month follow up.

7-Year Efficacy and Safety of iStent inject Trabecular Micro-Bypass in Combined and Standalone Usage.

INTRODUCTION: This study evaluated 7-year effectiveness and safety of second-generation trabecular micro-bypass implantation (iStent inject) either in combination with cataract surgery or as a standalone procedure (Combined or Standalone subgroups, respectively) in eyes with open-angle glaucoma. METHODS: This prospective, non-randomized, unmasked, longitudinal study included 125 consecutive iStent inject cases of a single surgeon at a large German academic hospital. Patients had considerable preoperative disease burden, with mean intraocular pressure (IOP) of 23.5 mmHg, 84.8% of eyes on ≥ 2 medications, and 38.4% of eyes with prior glaucoma surgery. IOP, medications, adverse events, and secondary surgeries were assessed through 7 years in the Overall cohort and in Combined (n = 81) and Standalone (n = 44) subgroups. RESULTS: Over 7-year follow-up, mean IOP decreased by 36.2-40.0% in Overall eyes, 34.1-38.9% in Combined eyes, and 39.5-43.5% in Standalone eyes (p < 0.001 at all timepoints for all groups). Meanwhile, mean medications decreased by 59.3-71.3% in Overall eyes, 57.9-69.0% in Combined eyes, and 62.1-76.2% in Standalone eyes (p < 0.001 at all timepoints in all groups). At last follow-up (mean 77.4 months; 92.8% of patients with last visit at 6 or 7 years), 83.7% of Overall eyes, 82.3% of Combined eyes, and 86.4% of Standalone eyes had achieved ≥ 20% IOP reduction vs preoperative. At last follow-up vs preoperative, 100% of eyes in all groups had the same or lower IOP and 100% had the same or lower medication regimen. Safety outcomes were favorable, with no filtration surgeries and only 4.84% of eyes experiencing clinically significant visual field loss over 7 years of follow-up. CONCLUSION: iStent inject implantation with or without phacoemulsification produced significant and durable 7-year reductions in IOP (~ 34-44% reduction) and medications (~ 58-76% reduction) while preventing filtering surgery in this cohort of patients with relatively high preoperative disease burden. Combined and Standalone cases had similarly favorable effectiveness and safety.

Intraoperative iStent versus postoperative selective laser trabeculoplasty in early glaucoma patients undergoing cataract surgery: A retrospective comparative study.

PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy and safety of iStent inject® versus 360° selective laser trabeculoplasty (SLT) in patients with early glaucoma undergoing cataract surgery. METHODS: A retrospective non-randomized study was conducted in 73 eyes divided into two groups: cataract surgery+intraoperative iStent (n=40) versus cataract surgery+postoperative SLT at one month (n=33). The primary endpoint was intraocular pressure (IOP) lowering≥20% between baseline and 6 months postoperatively. The secondary endpoints were IOP lowering at 1, 6 and 12 months, and the mean number of IOP-lowering medications at 6 and 12 months. RESULTS: The mean baseline IOP was 19.1 mmHg with no significant difference between groups. The mean baseline number of IOP-lowering medications was higher in the iStent group (n=1.95) compared to the SLT group (n=1.53; P=0.04). At 6 months, 18 (60%) patients in the SLT group and 20 (51%) patients in the iStent group achieved IOP lowering≥20% with no significant difference between groups (P=0.431). At 6 months, no difference in the mean number of IOP-lowering medications was found between groups (-0.92 and -0.89 in the iStent and SLT groups, respectively). Similar results were found at 12 months. CONCLUSION: These results suggest similar safety and efficacy of intraoperative iStent and postoperative 360° SLT in lowering IOP and reducing glaucoma eye drops in early glaucoma patients undergoing cataract surgery. Treatment choice should be based on the ophthalmologist's experience and on the cost-benefit ratio.

Trabecular microbypass stent combined with phacoemulsification in patients with open-angle glaucoma, 1-year outcome in a Taiwanese population.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of one trabecular microbypass stent (first generation iStent) combined with phacoemulsification cataract surgery (phaco) in eyes with open-angle glaucoma (OAG) in a Taiwanese population. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One trabecular microbypass stent was implanted after phacoemulsification cataract surgery by one surgeon. Intraocular pressure (IOP), medications, corrected distance visual acuity, complications, and adverse events were evaluated. RESULTS: This case series included 28 eyes of 25 patients with OAG (19 primary open-angle glaucoma [POAG] and 9 normal tension glaucoma [NTG]). None had previous trabeculectomy or laser trabeculoplasty. At 1 year, the mean IOP decreased from 19.34 ± 3.92 mmHg to 15.84 ± 3.05 mmHg, and the mean number of glaucoma medications decreased from 1.82 ± 1.12 to 0.79 ± 1.17 (both P < 0.001). Longer survival was observed in the NTG eyes (NTG: 11.67 ± 1.00 months, POAG: 9.53 ± 3.78 months, P = 0.031). iStent reposition was performed in one eye, and four eyes received laser treatment for stent occlusion. None had secondary glaucoma surgery. CONCLUSION: Combined phacoemulsification and iStent implantations are a safe and effective way in reducing IOP and medication burden in patients with OAG, especially NTG.

The effectiveness and safety of one-stage iStent-based micro-invasive glaucoma surgery-A retrospective study.

Purpose: Micro-invasive glaucoma surgery involves a group of treatment methods associated with a low rate of side effects and good effectiveness outcomes. One of the most frequently performed procedures belonging to this group is iStent microstent implantation. The aim of this study was to perform a retrospective evaluation of the safety and efficacy of a combined procedure involving cataract phacoemulsification and single iStent microstent implantation, performed simultaneously. Materials and methods: The complete medical records of 62 patients (91 eyes) were analyzed retrospectively, including the best corrected visual acuity, intraocular pressure, the mean defect of visual fields, and the number of active substances used in eye drops. The follow-up times were 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months after the surgical procedure. Results: A significant improvement in the best corrected visual acuity and a reduction of the intraocular pressure were achieved after the surgery. On average, after 12 months, the best corrected visual acuity improved from 0.70 (0.25) to 0.91 (0.18; p = 0.001), the intraocular pressure reduced from 17.76 (3.95) to 14.91 (3.04; p = 0.0001), and the number of active substances used in eye drops reduced from 2.07 (1.08) to 0.70 (0.06; p = 0001). In addition, we found that patients who initially showed higher intraocular pressure values did not benefit from surgery in the aspect of the number of active substances used in their eye drops. Intraoperative and postoperative adverse events were transient and ultimately did not affect the outcomes. Conclusion: Simultaneous cataract phacoemulsification with single iStent implantation in patients with open-angle glaucoma is a safe and effective method for reducing intraocular pressure and the number of topical medications that must be used. Having initially higher intraocular pressure values may limit the beneficial effects of iStent implantation by subordinating patients from topical treatment; thus, single iStent implantation may not be the most favorable choice in uncontrolled glaucoma cases.

Comparison of the iStent Inject® versus the iStent Inject® W-Both in Combination with Cataract Surgery-In Open-Angle Glaucoma.

We compare the short- and mid-term postoperative outcomes of the iStent inject® with its successor, the iStent inject® W. A retrospective monocentric study was performed to compare the iStent inject® used for cataract surgery with the iStent inject® W, also used for cataract surgery. The primary study endpoint was intraocular pressure (IOP) reduction six months after surgery. Six-month follow-up results were available for 35 eyes from 27 patients in the iStent inject® group and for 32 eyes from 25 patients in the iStent inject® W group. IOP reduction at six months post surgery was significantly greater in the iStent inject® W group (-2.2 mmHg [iStent inject® W] vs. -0.06 mmHg [iStent inject®], p = 0.037). There was a statistically greater decrease in glaucoma medication administration at six months in the iStent inject® group than in the iStent inject® W group (-1.28 agents vs. -0.62 agents, p = 0.007). These findings support the hypothesis that the superior positioning of the iStent inject® W (due to its larger base diameter) compared to the iStent Inject® leads to greater IOP reduction. Because of the short follow-up period, small study cohort, and differences in the number of glaucoma patients, the study results must be interpreted carefully.

[Micro-invasive glaucoma surgery]. / Mikroinvazivnaya khirurgiya glaukomy.

Glaucoma is a severe, rapidly progressing disease that in the absence of proper treatment leads to blindness in 20% of patients. According to the World Glaucoma Association, this disease is the most socially significant in modern ophthalmology and requires searching for new and effective methods of treatment. This article presents the results of research and reviews on this issue, considers both conservative therapy and surgical methods of treatment, analyzes in detail modern methods of micro-invasive eye surgery actively used in clinical practice. The article also describes indications for a various types of interventions, as well as the effect achieved by them and the possible complications, and presents the conclusions about the possibility of using these procedures in wide clinical practice.

Fellow-Eye Comparison between Phaco-Tanito Microhook Trabeculotomy and Phaco-iStent Inject W.

This study aims to compare the surgical efficacy and safety of the Tanito microhook trabeculotomy (TMH-CE) and iStent inject W (Inject-CE) when performed in combination with cataract surgery on the eyes of glaucoma patients. A total of 78 glaucomatous eyes from 39 participants were retrospectively analyzed. Intraocular pressure (IOP), the number of antiglaucoma medications, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), anterior chamber flare (ACF), and corneal endothelial cell density (CECD) were all evaluated preoperatively and at multiple postoperative time points. The preoperative IOP was significantly higher in the TMH-CE (19.6 ± 6.7 mmHg) than in the Inject-CE (15.7 ± 3.8 mmHg) (p < 0.0001). At the 12-month follow-up, reductions in IOP and the number of medications were more pronounced in the TMH-CE (6.6 mmHg, 27.6% and -1.1, respectively) group than Inject-CE (2.7 mmHg, 12.4% and -0.7, respectively) (p < 0.0001 and p = 0.0034), while the IOP and medication-number levels were identical between TMH-CE (13.0 ± 3.3 mmHg and 1.3 ± 0.9, respectively) and Inject-CE (12.9 ± 2.6 mmHg and 1.9 ± 0.9, respectively) (p = 0.88 and p > 0.99, respectively). The TMH-CE group exhibited a higher ACF, a higher frequency of layered hyphema, and a greater anterior chamber floating red blood cells score in the early postoperative periods. Despite these differences, the changes in BCVA, ACF, and CECD were equivalent between the two groups in later follow-up periods. TMH-CE provides a more significant IOP reduction and medication-number reduction compared to Inject-CE, while Inject-CE shows quicker BCVA recovery. This study provides valuable insights for ophthalmologists choosing the most suitable surgical approach for glaucoma and cataract patients.

Five-Year Outcomes of Single Trabecular Microbypass Stent (iStent®) Implantation with Phacoemulsification in Korean Patients.

INTRODUCTION: This study reports the long-term intraocular pressure (IOP)-lowering efficacy and safety of a single trabecular microbypass stent (iStent®; Glaukos Corp., San Clemente, CA, USA) for medically controlled open-angle glaucoma in Korean patients. METHODS: This retrospective observational study included 42 eyes of 35 patients with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG). All subjects underwent single first-generation iStent® implantation with phacoemulsification by a single surgeon with 5 years follow-up. The primary outcomes were changes in IOP and the number of antiglaucoma medications compared to the preoperative values. The secondary outcome was the proportion of eyes with IOP ≤ 18 mmHg without medication, ≤ 15 mmHg without medication, and ≤ 18 mmHg with or without medication. Adverse events and need for secondary glaucoma surgery were also recorded. RESULTS: The mean IOP decreased from 15.8 ± 2.8 to 13.8 ± 1.7 mmHg and the mean number of medications was reduced from 2.24 ± 1.18 to 0.83 ± 1.12, respectively, at year 5. At 3 and 5 years, 80.6% and 78.6% of eyes, respectively, were receiving fewer medications than preoperative numbers. In contrast, only 50% of eyes on four preoperative medications showed medication reductions at 5 years. At years 3 and 5, 61.3% and 53.5% of eyes achieved IOP ≤ 18 mmHg without medication, whereas 90.3% and 89.3% of eyes achieved ≤ 18 mmHg regardless of medication use, respectively. Four eyes required additional glaucoma surgery (two Ahmed glaucoma valve implantations, one trabeculectomy, and one XEN 45 Gel Stent implantation), and all were receiving four preoperative antiglaucoma medications. Transient IOP elevation (14.3%) was the most common complication, followed by five hyphema, one stent obstruction, one stent malposition, and one severe anterior chamber reaction. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated a good safety profile and sustained IOP reduction after the implantation of a single trabecular microbypass stent (iStent®) with phacoemulsification in Korean patients. The majority of subjects with POAG showed a relatively good response; however, eyes receiving a higher number of medications preoperatively (especially four medications) had difficulty achieving a low target IOP.

Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of Two Different Trabecular MIGS Devices With and Without Ab Interno Canaloplasty in Patients with Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma.

INTRODUCTION: This study compared outcomes of the iStent inject trabecular micro-bypass system versus the Hydrus Microstent in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG). METHODS: Forty subjects (80 eyes) with POAG were included in this single-center, retrospective, contralateral-eye analysis. All patients underwent phacoemulsification with either iStent inject or Hydrus implantation in one eye and the other device in the contralateral eye, with ≥ 3-month follow-up. In 58 eyes (27 iStent inject, 31 Hydrus) the surgery also included ab interno canaloplasty (ABiC). Twelve-month outcomes included intraocular pressure (IOP), medications, and adverse events. Subgroup analyses were completed for iStent inject versus Hydrus, and with versus without ABiC. RESULTS: At 12 months versus baseline, mean IOP reduced from 16.8 ± 3.7 to 13.6 ± 2.9 (p = 0.003) in iStent inject eyes, and from 18.1 ± 4.5 to 14.9 ± 3.2 mmHg (p = 0.003) in Hydrus eyes (between-group IOP reduction p = 0.582). Mean number of glaucoma medications reduced from 1.23 ± 0.97 to 0.30 ± 0.76 (p < 0.001) in iStent inject eyes and from 1.20 ± 1.02 to 0.39 ± 0.72 (p = 0.001) in Hydrus eyes (between-group medication reduction p = 0.943). At 12 months, 82.6% of iStent inject eyes and 73.9% of Hydrus eyes were medication-free versus 20.0% preoperatively in both groups (p < 0.0001 both groups). There were no statistically significant IOP or medication differences between iStent inject and Hydrus pre- or postoperatively, both in the overall cohort and in the with/without ABiC subgroups. Outcomes also were similar between eyes with/without ABiC in the overall cohort and in the iStent inject/Hydrus subgroups. There were no adverse events in the iStent inject group; two eyes in the Hydrus group had device-related complications requiring five additional surgeries (one Hydrus repositioning, one Hydrus exchange, one Hydrus removal, two goniotomies). CONCLUSION: In this contralateral-eye comparison of iStent inject versus Hydrus, the groups had similar IOP and medication outcomes, regardless of stratification by ABiC completion. Eyes receiving Hydrus had more complications and subsequent surgeries.

The present study contributes some of the first real-world data comparing iStent inject versus Hydrus Microstent implantation in combination with cataract surgery in opposite eyes (right or left) of the same patient (i.e., contralateral-eye study). The report also includes subgroup analyses of eyes with versus without ab interno canaloplasty (ABiC). There were no significant between-group differences in mean intraocular pressure or medication burden preoperatively or postoperatively for iStent inject versus Hydrus. The intraocular pressure and medication reductions versus the groups' respective baselines were statistically similar as well. Finally, results remained similar for iStent inject versus Hydrus regardless of whether ABiC was completed, and were also similar when comparing eyes with ABiC versus without ABiC. In eyes receiving Hydrus, there was a greater incidence of complications and need for further surgery.

Comparison of surgical outcomes between iStent inject W implantation and microhook ab interno trabeculotomy in combination with phacoemulsification in primary open-angle glaucoma patients.

Purpose: To examine primary open-angle glaucoma patients after undergoing combined cataract surgery with microhook ab interno trabeculotomy (µLOT-Phaco) or iStent inject W implantation (iStent-Phaco), and then evaluate the surgical outcomes after a minimum of 6 months of follow-up. Methods: Between October 2020 and July 2022, 39 µLOT-Phaco eyes and 55 iStent-Phaco eyes that underwent surgery were evaluated in this retrospective, multicenter comparative case series. Data that included preoperative and postoperative intraocular pressure (IOP), number of glaucoma medications, and occurrence of complications were collected from medical records and then examined. Surgical failure was defined as patients exhibiting a < 20% reduction in the preoperative IOP or an IOP > 18 mmHg on two consecutive follow-up visits, or when patients were required to undergo reoperation. Success rates were determined based on a Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. Results: At 3, 6 and 12 months postoperatively, there was a significant postoperative reduction in the IOP (p < 0.001) and in the medications scores (p < 0.001) for both of the groups. In the µLOT-Phaco and iStent-Phaco groups, the probabilities of success at 6 and 12 months were 55.3 and 45.5%, and 48.4 and 45.5% (p = 0.38; log-rank test), respectively. In the iStent-Phaco group, there was a significant decrease in the hyphema. Conclusion: Comparable surgical outcomes occurred for both the µLOT and iStent inject W procedures.

Comparing Outcomes of Phacoemulsification and Endocyclophotocoagulation with Either Dual Blade Goniotomy (PEcK) or Two Trabecular Stents (ICE2).

Purpose: To compare outcomes of phacoemulsification and endocyclophotocoagulation with either dual blade goniotomy (PEcK) or two trabecular stents (ICE2). Setting: Retrospective, nonrandomized comparative study from a level 3 triage center. Methods: One hundred and seventy charts and a total of 1294 visits were reviewed following either PEcK or ICE2 from 2018 to 2022. One hundred and twenty-eight patients had PEcK and 42 underwent ICE2. Patients with less than 30 days of follow-up were excluded. The mean follow-up time was 505 ± 308 days. Two Kaplan-Meier curves (KM) assessed survival with ≤ baseline medications while maintaining (1) [GIC - Goal IOP Criteria] IOP ≤ goal IOP or (2) [PRC - Percent Reduction Criteria] IOP reduction ≥ 20% with 5 mmHg ≤ IOP ≤ 21 mmHg for at least two consecutive visits. IOP and medication burden reduction were compared using a paired t-test. Results: Most patients were Caucasian (65%) and had mild-stage glaucoma (43%). The most common glaucoma type was primary open-angle glaucoma (58%). Average age was 72.2 years at the time of surgery. Mean preoperative IOP was 17.58 ± 4.98 mmHg on 3.00 ± 1.41 medications in PEcK and 15.36 ± 3.58 mmHg on 1.81 ± 1.11 medications in ICE2 (p = 0.015 for IOP; p < 0.001 for medications). Under GIC, the success rate was significantly higher in PEcK at POM6 (69% vs 46%, p < 0.001) and POY1 (63% vs 36%, p < 0.001). Under PRC, the success rate was significantly higher in PEcK at POM6 (73% vs 61%, p = 0.031) and POY1 (67% vs 50%, p = 0.028). Mean reductions at POY1 were 5.00 ± 4.31 mmHg on 1.35 ± 1.08 less medications after PEcK and 3.14 ± 2.83 mmHg on 1.01 ± 0.94 less medications after ICE2 (p < 0.001 at POY1 for IOP; p < 0.05 after POW6 for medications). Conclusion: Both PEcK and ICE2 reduce medication and IOP from baseline, with PEcK having more favorable GIC and PRC success rates and greater IOP and medication reduction at 1 year.

First-Generation iStent Bypass Implantation versus ab Externo Canaloplasty Combined with Phacoemulsification in Patients with Primary Open Angle Glaucoma-12-Month Follow-Up.

This prospective, non-randomized, interventional clinical study evaluated the efficacy and safety profile of first-generation iStent bypass implantation versus ab externo canaloplasty, both combined with phacoemulsification, in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) after 12-month follow-up. A total of 138 patients with POAG and their 138 eyes (69 phaco-iStent and 69 phacocanaloplasty) were included. Postoperatively at 12 months, the mean intraocular pressure (IOP) decreased from 18.44 ± 3.88 to 15.51 ± 2.50 mmHg and from 17.20 ± 4.04 to 14.97 ± 2.37 mmHg in the phaco-iStent (PiS) and phacocanaloplasty (PC) groups, respectively (p = 0.480). In both groups, 35.7% achieved >20% IOP reduction from baseline. A total of 86% and 71.4% of the eyes were medication-free at 12 months in the PiS and PC groups, respectively. In both groups, all eyes showed improvement in best-corrected visual acuity compared with baseline and demonstrated similar safety profiles throughout the 12-month follow-up period. This study showed equal hypotensive effects of PiS and PC. Both procedures significantly reduced the IOP and the requirement for IOP-lowering medications for at least 12 months postoperatively, with no significant differences between the groups.

Which is More Effective and Safer? Comparison of Propensity Score-Matched Microhook Ab Interno Trabeculotomy and iStent Inject.

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to compare the surgical outcomes between ab interno trabeculotomy (LOT) and iStent inject W implantation (iStent) both combined with cataract surgery, matching the background factors including age, intraocular pressure (IOP), medication score, central corneal thickness (CCT), and axial length. METHODS: A total of 100 eyes from 75/79 patients with primary open-angle glaucoma were included in the LOT/iStent groups. The background factors were matched between the two groups using the propensity score. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in age, IOP, medication score, CCT, and axial length, preoperatively. The postoperative medication scores were 1.3 ± 1.2 and 1.2 ± 1.2 in the LOT and iStent groups. The postoperative IOPs were 12.8 ± 2.8 and 13.1 ± 2.4 mmHg in the LOT and iStent groups, respectively. The changes in the medication score were - 0.64 ± 1.4 and - 0.44 ± 1.6 in the LOT and iStent groups, respectively. The changes in the IOP were - 2.1 ± 3.3 and - 1.5 ± 3.0 mmHg in the LOT and iStent groups, respectively. These values were not significantly different between the two groups. The postoperative IOP and changes in the IOP were significantly associated with preoperative IOP and CCT. There was no significant difference in the occurrence of postoperative complications (hyphema, 11.0% and 6.0%, and transient ocular hypertension, 8.0% and 5.0%, in the LOT and iStent groups, respectively). CONCLUSION: LOT and iStent have similar surgical outcomes with sufficient safety. Postoperative IOP was significantly associated with preoperative IOP and CCT in both groups.

Emerging glaucoma treatments: are we seeing an improvement in adherence?

Introduction: Non-adherence to glaucoma medication and poor follow-up is a global health concern. Areas covered: Glaucoma remains one of the largest causes of irreversible blindness worldwide. Traditional treatment guidelines suggest topical eye drop medication as first line therapy followed by addition of supplementary medications before proceeding to more invasive glaucoma surgeries. Unfortunately, poor glaucoma self-management remains high, leading to disease progression and blindness. Recent advancements in the field of pharmacotherapies, surgeries, and behavioral approaches have taken aim at increasing support for glaucoma self-management. We review the current and emerging approaches towards glaucoma management, with the exception of bleb-based surgical approaches, to investigate if they have had an impact on adherence. Literature searches were conducted via MEDLINE (PubMed), Embase (Elsevier), Cochrane Library (Wiley), and Preprints from January 1st, 2018, to January 26th, 2023. Expert opinion: The ability to offer patients a multitude of choices enables patients to tailor their glaucoma treatment to their values and lifestyle. Offering personalized patient education and coaching to support chronic glaucoma self-management would better enable patient engagement in whichever treatment path is chosen. Currently, literature regarding the impact of these new advancements on treatment engagement is lacking; this field is ripe for additional intervention and assessment.

Spotlight on Schlemm's Canal MicroStent Injection in Patients with Glaucoma.

Minimally invasive glaucoma surgery (MIGS) has revolutionized glaucoma care with its favorable safety profile and ability to delay or minimize the need for traditional, bleb-based procedures. Microstent device implantation is a type of angle-based MIGS, which reduces intraocular pressure (IOP) through bypass of the juxtacanalicular trabecular meshwork (TM) and facilitation of aqueous outflow into the Schlemm's canal. Although there are limited microstent devices on the market, multiple studies have evaluated the safety and efficacy of iStent® (Glaukos Corp.), iStent Inject® (Glaukos Corp.), and Hydrus® Microstent (Alcon) in the treatment of mild-to-moderate open-angle glaucoma, with and without concurrent phacoemulsification. This review attempts to provide a comprehensive evaluation of injectable angle-based microstent MIGS devices in the treatment of glaucoma.

Phacoemulsification with and without iStent: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Comparative Studies.

BACKGROUND: The iStent (Glaukos Corporation; Laguna Hills, CA, USA) is one of the minimally invasive glaucoma devices. It can be inserted at the time of phacoemulsification or as a stand-alone procedure to lower the intraocular pressure (IOP). OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing the effect of iStent insertion at the time of phacoemulsification with phacoemulsification alone in patients with ocular hypertension or open-angle glaucoma. METHODS: We searched EMBASE, MEDLINE (OVID and PubMed), CINAHL, and Cochrane Library for articles published between 2008 and June 2022 (PRISMA 2020 for the checklist). Studies comparing the IOP-lowering effect of iStent with phacoemulsification versus phacoemulsification alone were included. The endpoints were IOP reduction (IOPR) and the mean reduction in the number of glaucoma drops. A quality-effects model was used to compare both surgical groups. RESULTS: Ten studies were included, reporting on 1,453 eyes. Eight hundred fifty three eyes had the combined iStent and phacoemulsification, and 600 eyes underwent phacoemulsification alone. IOPR was higher in the combined surgery at of 4.7 ± 2 mm Hg compared to 2.8 ± 1.9 mm Hg in phacoemulsification alone. A greater decrease in postoperative eye drops was noted in the combined group having a decrease of 1.2 ± 0.3 eye drops versus of 0.6 ± 0.6 drops in isolated phacoemulsification. The quality effect model showed an IOPR weighted mean difference (WMD) of 1.22 mm Hg (confidence interval [CI]: [-0.43, 2.87]; Q = 315.64; p < 0.01; I2 = 97%) and decreased eye drops WMD 0.42 drops (CI: [0.22, 0.62]; Q = 42.6; p < 0.01; I2 = 84%) between both surgical groups. Subgroup analysis shows that the new generation iStent may be more effective in reducing IOP. CONCLUSION: iStent has a synergetic effect with phacoemulsification. The reduction of IOP and glaucoma eye drops was higher when iStent is combined with phacoemulsification compared with isolated phacoemulsification.

A case of two connected stents deployed during iStent inject W surgery.

BACKGROUND: We report a case with two connected stents ejected simultaneously during an iStent inject W surgery, a modified second-generation iStent Trabecular Micro-Bypass System. CASE PRESENTATION: A 57-year-old woman with primary open-angle glaucoma underwent a combined cataract and iStent inject W surgery in her left eye. After the trabecular meshwork/Schlemm's canal was pierced by the trocar of injector, the delivery button was pressed a first time, but the stent was not ejected. After the button was pressed a second time, connected two stents were ejected. After removing the dislocated stents from the anterior chamber, two stents were implanted into the desired places using another injector. Except for mild hyphema, no postoperative complication occurred. Stereomicroscopic observation showed that the two stents were connected by a broken trocar shaft. An X-ray showed that the trocar shaft was broken at the part referred to as the "sprayed trocar". Scanning electron microscopy showed that the surface features of the broken trocar and trocar tip represented tensile failure. CONCLUSIONS: Although rare, considering that the damage was seen at the structurally weak part (i.e., sprayed trocar), the same phenomenon can happen. For patient safety, surgeons are recommended to inspect the device when the deployment of either the first or second stent is unsuccessful during the iStent inject surgery.