Gustative Roussy Immune Score is a Predictor for Major Pathological Response in Rectal Cancer: A Result from the Preoperative Intraarterial Chemoembolization Combined with Radiotherapy (PCAR) Study.

Despite the emergence of various treatment strategies for rectal cancer based on neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, there is currently a lack of reliable biomarkers to determine which patients will respond well to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. Through collecting hematological and biochemical parameters data of patients prior to receiving neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, we evaluated the predictive value of systemic inflammatory indices for pathological response and prognosis in rectal cancer patients. We found that baseline GRIm-Score was an independent predictor for MPR in rectal cancer patients. However, no association was observed between several commonly systemic inflammation indices and long-term outcome.

The Gustave Roussy Immune score is a powerful biomarker for predicting therapeutic resistance to chemotherapy in gastric cancer patients.

PURPOSE: It is highly important to be able to predict the therapeutic efficacy of chemotherapy on patients with unresectable advanced or recurrent gastric cancer (GC). The Gustave Roussy Immune Score (GRIm-s) is a predictor of therapeutic sensitivity to chemotherapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in other cancers. The present study aimed to analyze the association of the GRIm-s with the therapeutic sensitivity of first-line chemotherapy in GC patients. METHODS: We included 156 patients receiving primary chemotherapy treatment for unresectable or advanced recurrent GC between January 2012 and December 2021 at our institution. We evaluated the correlation between the GRIm-s and therapeutic sensitivities to chemotherapy. The GRIm-s was assessed before the start of first-line chemotherapy. RESULTS: Among the 156 patients, 138 (88.5%) and 18 (11.5%) were classified in the low- and high-risk groups, respectively. The GRIm-s high-risk group was significantly older (p = 0.013), had more advanced unresectable cancer (p = 0.0098), and was significantly less likely to progress to second-line chemotherapy (p = 0.014). The overall survival rate (OS) (p = 0.039) and the progression free survival rate (PFS) (p = 0.017) were significantly worse in the GRIm-s high-risk group. The high GRIm-s was an independent prognostic factor for poor survival in multivariate analysis (p = 0.0094). CONCLUSIONS: Focusing on the GRIm-s before first-line chemotherapy initiation for unresectable advanced or postoperative recurrent GC was useful in predicting the therapeutic resistance to chemotherapy, transition to second-line chemotherapy, and poor prognosis.

SLC4A4 as a novel biomarker involved in immune system response and lung adenocarcinoma progression.

BACKGROUND: Altered expression and activity of solute carrier family 4 member 4 (SLC4A4) could affect the growth, survival and metastasis of tumor cells. Currently, the role of SLC4A4 in lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) immunotherapy and prognosis was not entirely clear. METHODS: We analyzed SLC4A4 expression in LUAD tissues and cell lines using quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction, Western blotting, and immunohistochemistry. The effects of SLC4A4 overexpression on angiogenesis, cell migration, invasion, and epithelial-mesenchymal transition were examined. Public databases helped construct a risk model evaluating SLC4A4's expression on LUAD prognosis and immunotherapy response. Additionally, a xenograft model, flow cytometry, and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay further explored SLC4A4's role in tumor immune microenvironment infiltration. RESULTS: Upregulation of SLC4A4 promoted apoptosis in the LUAD cell line and significantly inhibited the migration and invasive ability of cancer cells (P<0.01). A total of 10 key genes (including SIGLEC6, RHOV, PIR, MOB3B, MIR3135B, LPAR6, KRT8, ITGA2, CPS1, and C6) were screened according to SLC4A4 expression, immune score and stromal score, and a prognostic model with good outcome was constructed (AUC values of which in the training cohort at 1,3, and 5 years reached 0.73, 0.73, and 0.72, respectively). Importantly, we demonstrated that high expression of SLC4A4 was able to increase the proliferation level and cytokine secretion of CD8+ T cells for the purpose of promoting the immune system response to LUAD. CONCLUSION: Our study revealed that SLC4A4 can serve as a prognostic indicator for LUAD, providing new insights into the treatment and diagnosis of LUAD.

Prognostic Relevance of Preoperative Immune, Inflammatory, and Nutritional Biomarkers in Patients Undergoing Gastrectomy for Resectable Gastric Adenocarcinoma: An Observational Multicentre Study.

Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate different preoperative immune, inflammatory, and nutritional scores and their best cut-off values as predictors of poorer overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) in patients who underwent curative gastric cancer resection. Methods: This was a retrospective observational multicentre study based on data of the Spanish EURECCA Esophagogastric Cancer Registry. Time-dependent Youden index and log-rank test were used to obtain the best cut-offs of 18 preoperative biomarkers for OS and DFS. An adjusted Cox model with variables selected by bootstrapping was used to identify the best preoperative biomarkers, which were also analysed for every TNM stage. Results: High neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), high monocyte systemic inflammation index (moSII), and low prognostic nutritional index (PNI) were identified as independent predictors of poor outcome: NLR > 5.91 (HR:1.73; 95%CI [1.23-2.43]), moSII >2027.12 (HR:2.26; 95%CI [1.36-3.78]), and PNI >40.31 (HR:0.75; 95%CI [0.58-0.96]) for 5-year OS and NLR > 6.81 (HR:1.75; 95%CI [1.24-2.45]), moSII > 2027.12 (HR:2.46; 95%CI [1.49-4.04]), and PNI > 40.31 (HR:0.77; 95%CI [0.60,0.97]) for 5-year DFS. These outcomes were maintained in the whole cohort for NLR and moSII (p < 0.05) but not in stage II and for PNI in all tumoral stages. The associations of NLR-PNI and moSII-PNI were also a relevant prognostic factor for OS. Conclusions: High NLR, high moSII (for stages I and III), and low PNI (regardless of tumour stage) were the most promising preoperative biomarkers to predict poor OS and DFS in gastric cancer patients treated with curative intent.

Prognosis of patients with advanced bile tract carcinoma: assessment using the modified-Gustave Roussy Immune Score (mGRIm-s) as a clinico-immunological tool.

BACKGROUND: The emergence of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has enhanced survival outcomes for certain patients with advanced biliary tract carcinoma (BTC). Pinpointing those who would benefit most from immunotherapy remains elusive. We investigated the predictive value of the modified Gustave Roussy Immune Score (mGRIm-s) in BTC patients treated with ICIs. METHODS: Data from 110 patients at Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital, spanning September 2015 to April 2021, were analyzed. The median follow-up duration was 38.7 months as of December 2023. Risk factors included low albumin, high lactate dehydrogenase, and an elevated neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio. Patients were stratified into low (patients with no risk factors) and high (patients with at least one risk factor) mGRIm-s groups based on these factors. RESULTS: Survival outcomes post-immunotherapy favored the low mGRIm-s group, with significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) (8.50 months vs. 3.70 months and 21.60 months vs. 8.00 months). COX regression confirmed an elevated risk in the high mGRIm-s group. Subgroup analysis highlighted a notable survival advantage for low mGRIm-s patients receiving first-line immunotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: This study underscores mGRIm-s's potential in predicting immunotherapy response in BTC, paving the way for more targeted approaches.

Individualized management of immunosuppressants in liver transplant recipients by using a novel immune score system.

BACKGROUND: There is no reliable means to evaluate the immune status of liver transplant recipients. We proposed a novel score model, namely Mingdao immune cell analysis and Mingdao immune score system, to quantify the immunity. METHODS: Data from those who underwent a single liver transplant between January 2017 and June 2020 at Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, were collected. In addition, healthy volunteers were also enrolled. The score model was based on the immune cell populations determined by flow cytometry. RESULTS: There were a total of 376 healthy controls with 376 tests and 148 liver transplant recipients with 284 tests in this study. Evaluated by Mingdao immune cell analysis and Mingdao immune score system, the mean scores of healthy controls were near zero suggesting a balanced immune system. In contrast, the mean scores of liver transplant recipients were negative both before and after surgery indicating a compromised immune system. When liver transplant recipients were given a reduced or routine first dose according to their preoperative score, they had similar recovery of liver function. Moreover, liver transplant recipients with increased scores ≥ 5 were associated with elevated aspartate transaminase and alanine amiotransferase. Finally, on multivariate analysis the score model was the only significant independent risk factor for clinical acute rejection (P = 0.021; Odds ratio, 0.913; 95% confidence interval, 0.845-0.987). CONCLUSION: The novel score model could be used as an indicator to reflect immunity and to regulate immunosuppressants in liver transplant recipients after surgery.

Prognostic value of preoperative combined neutrophil, monocyte, and lymphocyte scores in patients with renal cell carcinoma undergoing laparoscopic nephrectomy: A retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: In a multi-institutional clinical study, we assessed the prognostic significance of a novel indicator preoperative peripheral blood immune (PBIS) scores that combined ratios of preoperative lymphocyte, monocyte, and neutrophil of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) patients undergoing laparoscopic nephrectomy. METHODS: Between January 2014 and December 2019, 438 patients with RCC were retrospectively analyzed in three centers. We used X-tile software to obtain the optimum cut-off values for neutrophils, monocytes, and lymphocytes to classify the patients. To assess the relationship between PBIS score and overall survival (OS), and cancer-specific survival (CSS) in patients with RCC by Kaplan-Meier survival curves and Cox regression analyses. In addition, predictive OS and CSS nomograms were constructed. The discriminative ability of nomogram and predictive performance accuracy were verified with consistency index (C-index), calibration curves, receiver operating curve (ROC) curves, decision curve analysis (DCA) curves, and time-dependent ROC curves. RESULTS: The optimum cutoff values for monocytes, lymphocytes, and neutrophils were 0.46, 1.01, and 4.50, respectively. We divided patients into four subgroups according to PBIS scores, which were significantly associated with M-stage (p = 0.008), T-stage (p < 0.001), N-stage (p = 0.006), and AJCC stage (p < 0.001). Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that RCC patients with lower PBIS scores showed a worse postoperative prognosis and served as an independent predictor of OS (p = 0.002) and CSS (p < 0.001). Ultimately, the nomograms based on PBIS scores demonstrated excellent predictive performance for OS (C-index: 0.770) and CSS (C-index: 0.828) through the analysis of calibration curves, ROC curves, DCA curves, and time-dependent ROC curves. CONCLUSION: PBIS score served as novel and effective predictor to accurately predict OS and CSS in patients with RCC receiving laparoscopic nephrectomy.

Association of the Advanced Lung Cancer Inflammation Index (ALI) and Gustave Roussy Immune (GRIm) score with immune checkpoint inhibitor efficacy in patients with gastrointestinal and lung cancer.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to conduct a comprehensive analysis, evaluating the prognostic significance of the baseline Advanced Lung Cancer Inflammation Index (ALI) and Gustave Roussy Immune (GRIm) Score in patients undergoing immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy. METHODS: A comprehensive search was performed across various databases, including PubMed, the Cochrane Library, EMBASE, and Google Scholar, until October 21, 2023, to compile relevant articles for analysis. The investigation encompassed diverse clinical outcomes, including overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). RESULTS: This analysis included a total of 15 articles, comprising 19 studies involving 3335 patients. Among the 19 studies, nine studies focused on NSCLC, and six studies were conducted on HCC. Pooled results revealed that patients with elevated ALI levels experienced prolonged OS (HR: 0.51, 95% CI: 0.37-0.70, p < 0.001) and extended PFS (HR: 0.61, 95% CI: 0.52-0.72, p < 0.001). Furthermore, a GRIm score > 1 was associated with reduced OS (HR: 2.07, 95% CI: 1.47-2.92, p < 0.001) and diminished PFS (HR: 1.78, 95% CI: 1.35-2.34, p < 0.001) in cancer patients receiving ICIs. Subgroup analysis indicated that ALI cutoff values of 18 exhibited enhanced predictive potential. Additionally, for HCC patients, those with HCC-GRIm score > 2 showed a substantially decreased risk of mortality compared to individuals with HCC-GRIm score ≤ 2 (HR: 2.63, 95% CI: 1.89-3.65, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The ALI and GRIm score served as dependable prognostic indicators for patients undergoing ICI therapy in the context of cancer treatment.

Association between ascites Gustave Roussy immune score and the intratumoural microbiome in malignant ascites secondary to hepatocellular carcinoma.

BACKGROUNDS: The Gustave Roussy Immune (GRIm) score predicts survival outcomes in several cancers. However, the prognostic significance of the GRIm score in patients with malignant ascites has not yet been investigated. METHODS: Clinical samples were collected from a cohort of patients with malignant ascites secondary to hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We calculated serum GRIm (sGRIm) and ascites GRIm (aGRIm) scores and divided the samples into low and high GRIm score groups. Survival analysis was used to compare the prognostic significance of the sGRIm and aGRIm scores. 16S rRNA sequencing was performed to determine the profiles of the intratumoral microbiota in the groups. A fluorescent multiplex immunohistochemistry (mIHC) assay was used to detect the expression of different immune cells by labeling seven markers of malignant ascites. RESULTS: 155 patients with HCC and malignant ascites were enrolled in this study. Survival analysis revealed that the aGRIm score showed a superior prognostic significance compared to the sGRIm score. Microbial analysis demonstrated that the bacterial richness and diversity were higher in the low aGRIm score group than in the high aGRIm score group. LefSe analysis revealed that certain bacteria were correlated with high aGRIm scores. Fluorescent mIHC displayed the tumor microenvironment of malignant ascites and found that the density of CD8 + T cells was significantly higher in the low aGRIm score group than in the high aGRIm score group. CONCLUSIONS: Our present study identified a novel scoring system (aGRIm score) that can predict the survival outcome of patients with malignant ascites secondary to HCC.

Exploring Prognostic Immune Microenvironment-Related Genes in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma from the TCGA Database.

Purpose: Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) has a high rate of local and distant metastases. In tumor tissues, the interaction between tumor cells and the tumor microenvironment (TME) is closely related to cancer development and prognosis. Therefore, screening for TME-related genes in HNSCC is crucial for understanding metastatic patterns. Methods: Our research relied mainly on a novel algorithm called Estimation of STromal and Immune cells in MAlignant Tumors using Expression data (ESTIMATE). Fragments Per Kilobase of exon model per Million mapped fragments (FPKM) data and HNSCC clinical data were obtained from the TCGA database, and the purity of HNSCC tissue and the features of stromal and immune cell infiltration were determined. Furthermore, differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were screened based on immune, stromal, and ESTIMATE scores, and their protein-protein interaction (PPI) networks and ClueGO functions were evaluated. Finally, the expression profiles of DEGs related to immunity in HNSCC were determined. Differential gene expression was verified in the highly invasive oral cancer cell lines (SCC-25, CAL-27, and FaDu) and oral cancer tissues. Results: Our analysis found that both the immune and ESTIMATE scores were significantly associated with the prognosis of HNSCC. Moreover, cross-validation using the Venn algorithm revealed that 433 genes were significantly upregulated, and 394 genes were significantly downregulated. All DEGs were associated with both ESTIMATE and immune scores. The enrichment of cytokine-cytokine receptor interactions and chemokine signaling pathways was observed using pathway enrichment analyses. We initially screened 25 genes after analyzing the key sub-networks of the PPI network. Survival analysis revealed the significance of CCR4, CXCR3, P2RY14, CCR2, CCR8, and CCL19 in relation to survival and their association with immune infiltration-related metastasis in HNSCC. Conclusions: The expression profiles of relevant TME-related genes were screened following stromal and immune cell scoring using ESTIMATE, and DEGs associated with survival were identified. These TME-related gene markers offer valuable utility as both prognostic indicators and markers denoting metastatic traits in HNSCC.

A risk model based on 10 ferroptosis regulators and markers established by LASSO-regularized linear Cox regression has a good prognostic value for ovarian cancer patients.

Ovarian cancer is the deadliest gynecologic cancer due to its high rate of recurrence and limited early diagnosis. For certain patients, particularly those with recurring disorders, standard treatment alone is insufficient in the majority of cases. Ferroptosis, an iron- and ROS (reactive oxygen species)-reliant cell death, plays a vital role in the occurrence of ovarian cancer. Herein, subjects from TCGA-OV were calculated for immune scores using the ESTIMATE algorithm and assigned into high- (N = 185) or low-immune (N = 193) score groups; 259 ferroptosis regulators and markers were analyzed for expression, and 64 were significantly differentially expressed between two groups. These 64 differentially expressed genes were applied for LASSO-regularized linear Cox regression for establishing ferroptosis regulators and a markers-based risk model, and a 10-gene signature was established. The ROC curve indicated that the risk score-based curve showed satisfactory predictive efficiency. Univariate and multivariate Cox risk regression analyses showed that age and risk score were risk factors for ovarian cancer patients' overall survival; patients in the high-risk score group obtained lower immune scores. The Nomogram analysis indicated that the model has a good prognostic performance. GO functional enrichment annotation confirmed again the involvement of these 10 genes in ferroptosis and immune activities. TIMER online analysis showed that risk factors and immune cells were significantly correlated. In conclusion, the risk model based on 10 ferroptosis regulators and markers has a good prognostic value for ovarian cancer patients.

CD3-CD8 immune score associated with a clinical score stratifies PDAC prognosis regardless of adjuvant or neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Stratification of the prognosis of pancreatic cancer (PDAC) patients treated by surgery is based solely on clinical variables, such as tumor stage and node status. The development of biomarkers of relapse is needed, especially to drive administration of adjuvant therapy in this at-risk population. Our study evaluates the prognostic performance of a CD3- and CD8-based immune score. CD3, CD8 and Foxp3 expression were evaluated on whole slides in two retrospective PDAC cohorts totaling 334 patients. For this study, we developed an immune score to estimate CD3 and CD8 infiltration in both tumor core and invasive margin using computer-guided analysis with QuPath software. Variables were combined in a dichotomous immune score. The association between immune and clinical scores, and both PFS and OS was investigated. We observed that a dichotomous immune score predicts both PFS and OS of localized PDAC. By univariate and multivariate analysis, immune score, tumor grade, adjuvant therapy, lymph node status, and adjuvant chemotherapy administration were associated with PFS and OS. We subsequently associated the PDAC immune score and clinical variables in a combined score. This combined score predicted patient outcomes independently of adjuvant or neoadjuvant treatment, and improved patient prognostic prediction compared to clinical variables or immune score alone.

Construction of immune score and its prognostic value in invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast using computational pathology analysis.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have shown that high level of TILs in invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) is associated with poor prognosis, contrary to that in TNBC and HER2-positive breast cancer. METHODS: The densities of six immune cell markers and three immune checkpoints in the ILC microenvironment were detected by computational pathology analysis. Then, the LASSO cox regression model was used to construct an immune score (IS) and further evaluate its prognostic value. RESULTS: In our ILC cohort, the low density of CD4, CD8, CD20, CD56, CD68, FOXP3, PD-1, and PD-L1 had significantly longer disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS); however, the low density of CTLA-4 was associated with shorter DFS and OS. Based on this, an IS was constructed, and patients with low-IS had significantly prolonged DFS (p < 0.0001) and OS (p < 0.0001). Multivariate analysis revealed that IS was an independent prognostic indicator for DFS and OS. Further analysis showed that IS may increase the prognostic value of TNM stage. We further explored the prognostic role of CD68 and FOXP3 in the transcriptional level and the corresponding ISm in the METABRIC dataset, and found that low proportion of CD68 and FOXP3 and their ISm were associated with longer OS, and ISm was also an independent prognostic factor for OS. CONCLUSION: IS was a promising biomarker to distinguish the prognosis in ILC patients.

The prognostic value of a combined immune score in tumor and immune cells assessed by immunohistochemistry in triple-negative breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to develop a novel combined immune score (CIS)-based model assessing prognosis in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). METHODS: The expression of eight immune markers (PD-1, PD-L1, PD-L2, IDO, TIM3, OX40, OX40L, and H7-H2) was assessed with immunohistochemistry on the tumor cells (TCs) and immune cells (ICs) of 227 TNBC cases, respectively, and subsequently associated with selected clinicopathological parameters and survival. Data retrieved from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) were further examined to validate our findings. RESULTS: All immune markers were often expressed in TCs and ICs, except for PD-1 which was not expressed in TCs. In ICs, the expression of all immune markers was positively correlated between one another, except between PD-L1 and OX40, also TIM3 and OX40. In ICs, PD-1, PD-L1, and OX40L positive expression was associated with a longer progression-free survival (PFS; p = 0.040, p = 0.020, and p = 0.020, respectively). In TCs, OX40 positive expression was associated with a shorter PFS (p = 0.025). Subsequently, the TNBC patients were classified into high and low combined immune score groups (CIS-H and CIS-L), based on the expression levels of a selection of biomarkers in TCs (TCIS-H or TCIS-L) and ICs (ICIS-H or ICIS-L). The TCIS-H group was significantly associated with a longer PFS (p < 0.001). Furthermore, the ICIS-H group was additionally associated with a longer PFS (p < 0.001) and overall survival (OS; p = 0.001), at significant levels. In the multivariate analysis, both TCIS-H and ICIS-H groups were identified as independent predictors of favorable PFS (p = 0.012 and p = 0.001, respectively). ICIS-H was also shown to be an independent predictor of favorable OS (p = 0.003). The analysis of the mRNA expression data from TCGA also validated our findings regarding TNBC. CONCLUSION: Our novel TCIS and ICIS exhibited a significant prognostic value in TNBC. Additional research would be needed to strengthen our findings and identify the most efficient prognostic and predictive biomarkers for TNBC patients.

Stromal score is a promising index in tumor patients' outcome determination.

Background: Immune status is widely acknowledged as a valuable marker for predicting cancer prognosis and therapy response. However, there has been a limited understanding of the stromal landscape in cancer. Methods: By employing ESTIMATE, stromal- and immune-scores were inferred for 6193 tumor samples spanning 12 cancer types sourced from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). Subsequently, the samples were categorized into seven groups based on their stromal and immune scores. A comparison of prognosis, lymphocyte and stromal cell infiltration, and the response to programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) therapy was conducted among these subtypes. Results: It was unveiled by the analysis that, in the majority of cancer types, stromal score exhibited a more potent predictive capability for outcomes compared to the immune score. Furthermore, it was observed that in four cancer types, intermediate immune infiltration coupled with low stromal infiltration correlated with the most favorable overall survival, whereas an unfavorable outcome was predicted in colorectal cancer (CRC) and stomach adenocarcinoma (STAD) when high immune infiltration coexisted with intermediate or high stromal infiltration. Conclusion: In summary, while high immune scores frequently correlate with a positive prognosis, such correlation is not universal. A potential strategy to address the current limitations of the immune score in specific circumstances could involve a focus on stromal scores or a subtle integration of stromal and immune status.

Prognostic significance of the Gustave Roussy immune (GRIm) score in cancer patients: a meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: The prognostic value of the Gustave Roussy immune (GRIm) score in cancer patients has been widely reported but remains inconsistent. The aim of this study is to systematically investigate the relationship between the GRIm score and survival outcomes in cancer patients. METHODS: Relevant literature was identified using electronic databases including Web of Science, PubMed, and Embase from the inception to March 2023. The primary endpoints were long-term oncological outcomes. Subgroup analysis and sensitivity analysis were conducted during the meta-analysis. RESULTS: Fifteen studies (20 cohorts) including 4997 cancer patients were enrolled. The combined results revealed that patients in the high GRIm group had a deteriorated overall survival (HR = 2.07 95%CI: 1.73-2.48; p < 0.0001; I2 = 62%) and progression-free survival (HR = 1.42; 95%CI: 1.22-1.66; p < 0.0001; I2 = 36%). The prognostic values of GRIm on overall survival and progression-free survival were observed across various tumour types and tumour stages. Sensitivity analysis supported the stability and reliability of the above results. CONCLUSION: Our evidence suggested that the GRIm score could be a valuable prognostic marker in cancer patients, which can be used by clinicians to stratify patients and formulate individualized treatment plans.

Homogeneity in immune features between colorectal liver metastases better identifies patients with good prognosis compared to pathological response to preoperative chemotherapy.

In colorectal cancer liver metastases (CRLM), the density of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, the expression of class I major histocompatibility complex (MHC-I), and the pathological response to preoperative chemotherapy have been associated with oncological outcomes after complete resection. However, the prognostic significance of the heterogeneity of these features in patients with multiple CRLMs remains under investigation. We used a tissue microarray of 220 mismatch repair-gene proficient CRLMs resected in 97 patients followed prospectively to quantify CD3+ T cells and MHC-I by immunohistochemistry. Histopathological response to preoperative chemotherapy was assessed using standard scoring systems. We tested associations between clinical, immunological, and pathological features with oncologic outcomes. Overall, 29 patients (30.2%) had CRLMs homogeneous for CD3+ T cell infiltration and MHC-I. Patients with immune homogeneous compared to heterogeneous CRLMs had longer median time to recurrence (TTR) (30 vs. 12 months, p = .0018) and disease-specific survival (DSS) (not reached vs. 48 months, p = .0009). At 6 years, 80% of the patients with immune homogeneous CRLMs were still alive. Homogeneity of response to preoperative chemotherapy was seen in 60 (61.9%) and 69 (80.2%) patients according to different grading systems and was not associated with TTR or DSS. CD3 and MHC-I heterogeneity was independent of response to pre-operative chemotherapy and of other clinicopathological variables for their association with oncological outcomes. In patients with multiple CRLMs resected with curative intent, similar adaptive immune features seen across metastases could be more informative than pathological response to pre-operative chemotherapy in predicting oncological outcomes.

Molecular subtyping and immune score system by a novel pyroptosis-based gene signature precisely predict immune infiltrating, survival and response to immune-checkpoint blockade in breast cancer.

Breast cancer is one of the most prevalent and lethal types of cancer affecting women globally. Pyroptosis is a recently elucidated form of inflammatory cell death mediated by the gasdermin family and is considered to be associated with the tumor immune microenvironment. However, the impact of pyroptosis on breast cancer patients remains unclear. In this study, we identified 31 Pyroptosis-Related-Genes (PRGs) and investigated their association with patient survival using data from the TCGA database. We then established a gene signature comprising 6 PRGs that were significantly correlated with prognosis, and used these genes to classify breast cancer into 2 molecular subtypes. We investigated the characteristics of these two subtypes and found that our molecular subtyping accurately separated the samples into two groups with distinct immune infiltration and prognosis. Patients with higher expression of these genes had significantly greater immune infiltrating, T cell signaling, and better prognosis. Moreover, we developed an immune score system based on these 6 genes that accurately predicted the immune infiltrating of patients and their response to immune-checkpoint blockade, which was difficult to achieve with previous models. Additionally, through single-cell analyses, we found that patients with higher immune scores had stronger cytotoxic immune cells. In summary, our study identified a novel gene set and developed an immune scoring system based on this gene set that can precisely predict the immune microenvironment and responses to immunotherapy of breast cancer (BRCA) patients, which could be useful in clinical trials.

Gustave Roussy immune score is a prognostic marker in patients with small cell lung cancer undergoing immunotherapy: a real-world retrospective study.

Background: The utilization of the Gustave Roussy Immune Score (GRIm-Score) in patient selection for immunotherapy was initially reported. The objective of this retrospective study is to assess the potential of the GRIm-Score, a novel prognostic score based on nutritional and inflammatory markers, as a prognostic predictor in patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC) undergoing immunotherapy. Methods: This retrospective study conducted at a single center included 159 patients with SCLC who received immunotherapy. The objective of the study was to investigate potential differences in overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) among patients stratified by their GRIm-Score, utilizing the Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and the log-rank test. The final independent prognostic factors were identified through both propensity score matching (PSM) analysis and multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression analysis. Results: Our analysis of the 159 patients revealed that there was a significant decrease in both OS and PFS with each increase in the GRIm-Score group, displaying a stepwise pattern. Moreover, even after conducting PSM analysis, the significant associations between the modified three-category risk scale-based GRIm-Score and survival outcomes remained significant. Both the total cohort and PSM cohort were subjected to multivariable analysis, which demonstrated that the three-category risk assessment-based GRIm-Score was a valuable predictor of both OS and PFS. Conclusions: In addition, the GRIm-Score may serve as a valuable and non-invasive prognostic predictor for SCLC patients undergoing PD1/PD-L1 immunotherapy.

Neo-peripheral adaptive immune score predicts neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced breast cancer.

PURPOSE: Whether peripheral immune cell subsets can predict pathological complete response (pCR) in breast cancer patients remains to be elucidated. We aimed to dissect the relationship between peripheral immune cell subsets and pCR. METHODS: Two hundred and twenty-six eligible patients from two prospective clinical trials (SHPD001 and SHPD002) in China were randomly divided into a training cohort and a validation cohort. The breast cancer subtypes in this study included hormone receptor (HR)-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative (n = 95), HER2-positive (n = 100), and triple negative (n = 31) breast cancer. We defined the "Neo-Peripheral Adaptive Immune Score" for neoadjuvant chemotherapy (neoPAI Score) based on the percentages of CD4 + T cells, CD8 + T cells, B cells, and the CD4 + /CD8 + ratio in peripheral blood. We also evaluated the ability of the neoPAI Score derived from tumor-infiltrating immune cells (TIICs) to predict survival by employing The Cancer Genome Atlas-Breast Cancer (TCGA-BRCA) database. RESULTS: In the training cohort, multivariate analysis showed that HR status [odds ratio (OR) 0.325; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.135-0.761; P = 0.010], HER2 status (OR 2.657; 95% CI 1.266-5.730; P = 0.011), Ki67 index (OR 3.191; 95% CI 1.509-6.956; P = 0.003), histological grade (OR 2.297; 95% CI 1.031-5.290; P = 0.045) and neoPAI Score (OR 4.451; 95% CI 1.608-13.068; P = 0.005) were independent predictors of pCR. In the validation cohort, histological grade (OR 3.779; 95% CI 3.793-1.136 × 103; P = 0.008) and neoPAI Score (OR 90.828; 95% CI 3.827-9.843 × 103; P = 0.019) were independent predictors of pCR. The Immune Model that integrated the neoPAI Score was more accurate in predicting pCR than the Clinical Model that exclusively contained clinicopathological parameters in both cohorts. In TCGA-BRCA database, the neoPAI Score constructed from TIICs can predict the progression-free interval (P = 0.048) of breast cancer. CONCLUSION: The neoPAI Score defined by the percentages of peripheral immune cell subsets could be used as a potential biomarker for neoadjuvant chemotherapy efficacy.