Sending a Signal: Evaluating the Impact of Program and Geographic Preference Signaling on the Internal Medicine Residency Match.

Background For over a decade, the number of residency applications has surged, a trend known as "application inflation." COVID-19 further intensified this trend, leading the Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC) to address the issue by introducing a supplemental application in the 2021-2022 cycle, allowing programs to identify applicants with a connection to their program or geographic region. For the 2022-2023 cycle, the number of program signals increased from five to seven. The impact of the supplemental application and the increase in signals on the likelihood of an applicant matching with a program has yet to be evaluated. Methods This retrospective cohort study evaluated the impact of program signaling and geographic preference on the matching likelihood in our internal medicine residency program. Data from MyERAS® and the Supplemental Application for 640 applicants who applied to our large, urban, university-based program in the Southeastern United States during the 2020-2021 and 2022-2023 application cycles were included. Using univariate and multivariate analysis, we examined the correlation between program signal, geographic preference, and final match location. Results Applicants who sent a program signal had nearly three-fold higher odds of matching with our program. Geographic preference was numerically but not statistically associated with higher odds of matching. Both signaling a preference for matching with a program in an urban environment and couples matching correlated with decreased odds of matching with our program. Geography was an important predictor of match location as residing in our AAMC geographic region, our four-state area, and our specific state had increased odds of matching with our program. Conclusions Signaling our program was associated with increased odds of matching with our program. Geographic preferences were less predictive of a match with our program; however, they did predict the likelihood of a match at a program within that region. Future studies are needed to ensure external validity.

Through the Looking Glass: Comparing Hospitalists' and Internal Medicine Residents' Perceptions of Feedback.

INTRODUCTION: Feedback is critical for resident growth and is most effective when the relationship between residents and attendings is collaborative, with shared expectations for the purpose, timing, and manner of communication for feedback. Within internal medicine, there is limited work exploring the resident and hospitalist perspectives on whether key elements are included in feedback sessions. METHODS: We surveyed internal medicine residents and supervising hospitalists at a large urban training program about their perspectives on four components of effective feedback: specificity,timeliness, respectful communication, and actionability. RESULTS: We received surveys from 130/184 internal medicine residents and 74/129 hospitalists (71% and 57% response rate, respectively). Residents and hospitalists differed in their perspectives about specificity and timeliness: 54% (70/129) of residents reported they did not receive specific feedback while 90% (65/72) of hospitalists reported they delivered specific feedback (p<0.01), and 33% (43/129) of residents compared with 82% (59/72) of hospitalists perceived feedback as timely (p<0.01). Internal medicine residents and hospitalists reported concordant rates of feedback sessions consisting of a two-way conversation (84%, 109/129; 89%, 64/72, respectively, p=0.82) and that communication was delivered in a respectful manner (95%, 122/129; 97%, 70/72, respectively, p=0.57). CONCLUSIONS: We observed discordance between internal medicine residents and supervising hospitalist perspectives on the inclusion of two critical components of feedback: specificity and timing. The hospitalist cohort reported delivering more components of effective feedback than the resident cohort reported receiving. The etiology of this discordance is likely multifactorial and requires further investigation.

Understanding Internal Medicine Residents' Rheumatology Knowledge Base.

Rheumatology is one of the internal medicine subspecialties that residents train to become proficient in during their internal medicine training. Our study sought to understand how residents across all postgraduate year levels felt in terms of comfortability and exposure to rheumatology. We focused on the subjective measurement of resident knowledge and exposure rather than objective data. A five-question survey was distributed to all 75 residents of Lenox Hill Hospital's Internal Medicine categorical residency program, from PGY1 to PGY3. When asked if they get enough exposure or feel confident treating patients with rheumatology diseases, 96% of residents responded no. When asked about their confidence in boards, the average response was a 3/10. The residents at our program voiced a strong concern for lack of exposure and education. Other studies and institutions have shown this to be a problem that has also been seen with poor test performance on the subject. We explore educational modalities to help improve this gap in education.

The House Cup: Using Longitudinal Gamification to Improve Didactic Attendance.

OBJECTIVE: Determine if a point-based attendance system combined with longitudinal gamification is feasible and improves didactic session attendance and learner perceptions at our internal medicine residency. METHODS: A prospective before-after cohort study. Weekly attendance was tracked from June 2022 through April 2023 at our university-affiliated internal medicine residency program. We implemented a point-based longitudinal game incentivizing residents to attend didactics with positive reinforcement in July 2022 (C: carrot). We added tiered positive reinforcement and positive punishment to the game in January 2023 (CS: carrot and stick). Attendance during these periods was compared to pre (P) and postintervention (S). Perceptions were assessed during the P, C, and CS periods with Likert scale ratings. RESULTS: CS was associated with higher attendance than other study periods (P = .002). Median attendance was P-51% (IQR 37.5-64.5), C-65% (IQR 50-74), CS-81% (IQR 78-94), and S-66% (IQR 63-71). Perceptions were similar during pre and intervention study periods, including perceptions of camaraderie (P-4.4, C-4.4, CS-4.5; P = .56), interest in attending didactic sessions (P-3.7, C-3.4, CS-3.2; P = .21), and mandate as the primary reason for attending didactics (P-3.1, C-3.1, CS-3.2; P = .96). CONCLUSIONS: A point-based attendance system combined with a longitudinal game that included tiered positive reinforcement and positive punishment was feasible and associated with higher didactic attendance but not associated with changes in resident perceptions.

Stereotype Threat and Gender Bias in Internal Medicine Residency: It is Still Hard to be in Charge.

BACKGROUND: Despite similar numbers of women and men in internal medicine (IM) residency, women face unique challenges. Stereotype threat is hypothesized to contribute to underrepresentation of women in academic leadership, and exploring how it manifests in residency may provide insight into forces that perpetuate gender disparities. OBJECTIVE: To quantify the prevalence of stereotype threat in IM residency and explore experiences contributing to that stereotype threat. DESIGN: We used a mixed methods study design. First, we surveyed IM residents using the Stereotype Vulnerability Scale (SVS) to screen for stereotype threat. Second, we conducted focus groups with women who scored high on the SVS to understand experiences that led to stereotype threat. PARTICIPANTS: The survey was sent to all IM residents at University of California, San Francisco (UCSF), in September-November 2019. Focus groups were conducted at UCSF in Spring 2020. APPROACH: The survey included an adapted version of the SVS. For focus groups, we developed a focus group guide informed by literature on stereotype threat. We used a thematic approach to data analysis. The mixed methods design enabled us to draw metainferences by integrating the two data sources. KEY RESULTS: Survey response rate was 61% (110/181). Women were significantly more likely than men to have a score indicating stereotype threat vulnerability (77% vs 0%, p < 0.001). Four themes from focus groups characterized women's experiences of gender bias and stereotype threat: gender norm tension, microaggressions and sexual harassment, authority questioned, and support and allyship. CONCLUSIONS: Gender-based stereotype threat is highly prevalent among women IM residents. This phenomenon poses a threat to confidence and ability to execute patient care responsibilities, detracting from well-being and professional development. These findings indicate that, despite robust representation of women in IM training, further attention is needed to address gendered experiences and contributors to women's vulnerability to stereotype threat.

A Growing Mandate in American Medicine: Teaching Our Internal Medicine Residents About Healthcare Administration and Leadership.

Leadership training during residency is essential for the successful development of contemporary physicians. Creating a curriculum for healthcare leadership and administration for internal medicine residents is particularly challenging due to the heterogeneity of leadership curricula across programs, the emphasis on individual advancement rather than collective leadership, and the scarcity of published research on the topic. A healthcare administration and leadership rotation for medical residents is a valuable experience that emphasizes the importance of contextualizing education on leadership and building relationships to achieve organizational goals.

Morbidity and Mortality Conferences in Internal Medicine Specialty Training in Japan: A Nationwide Cross-sectional Study.

Objective This study evaluated the implementation status of morbidity and mortality conferences in internal medicine specialty training programs in Japan. Methods This cross-sectional study surveyed hospitals in Japan with certified internal medicine specialty training programs. Program directors or equivalently responsible physicians managing certified internal medicine training programs were invited to participate in this study (n=619). Materials Data were collected using an online questionnaire that included questions about the number of morbidity and mortality conferences, types of cases covered, collaboration of the patient safety section and other health professions, and whether or not the conferences were conducted by a subspecialty department-led or program-based. Results Responses were received from 123 hospitals (19.8% response rate), of which 59 (48%) had some form of internal medicine morbidity and mortality conference in place. The average number per year was 9.63 (standard deviation: 18.12). Hospitals with morbidity and mortality conferences in subspecialty departments held significantly more conferences than X (please define X). Furthermore, the involvement of the patient safety department tended to be associated with holding more conferences. Autopsy rates were significantly higher in hospitals with program-based internal medicine morbidity and mortality conferences than subspecialty-led. Conclusion Internal medicine specialty training hospitals had more morbidity and mortality conferences than previously reported. Program-based morbidity and mortality conferences in internal medicine are associated with higher autopsy rates and may lead to an organizational reporting culture and lifelong learning attitudes that support patient safety. Collaboration with organizational management sections, such as patient safety, would be effective in implementing these conferences in internal medicine training programs.

Resident Physicians' Knowledge of Emergency Medical Services: A Comparison Between Emergency Medicine and Non-Emergency Medicine Resident Physicians.

Background and objective Emergency medical services (EMS) are often assumed to only involve bringing patients to physicians for treatment in the emergency department. However, EMS staff are also responsible for responding to physicians in the primary care setting when medical emergencies arise. While emergency medicine (EM) residents are exposed to EMS as part of their curriculum, little is known about the knowledge of other resident physicians who may interact with EMS. In light of this, we conducted this study to address the scarcity of data related to this topic. Methods A quantitative cross-sectional knowledge assessment was conducted among resident physicians in emergency medicine, internal medicine, family medicine, pediatric, and combined medicine and pediatric residencies at the Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center. Results Eighteen EM residents and 26 non-EM residents completed the assessment. The EM residents had a higher average score when compared to non-emergency medicine residents (69.2% vs. 53.8%, p=0.0012). Conclusion Variations in scores between EM and other specialties that interact with EMS highlight the need for further training and familiarization related to EMS for residents in non-EM specialties.

The Morning Report Practice and Its Contribution to Education of Internal Medicine Residents: A Multicenter Cross-Sectional Survey in the Eastern Province, Saudi Arabia.

Background: Morning Report (MR) is a ubiquitous traditional educational activity in internal medicine residency training. It is under-researched; hence, this study was conducted. It aimed to examine the practice of MR by internal medicine residents, their motivation to engage with it, and their perception of its contribution to education. Methods: This was a multi-center cross-sectional study. The data was collected using an online self-administered 12-item questionnaire that covered MR practice, respondents' motivation for participation, MR contribution to education, and its impact on the practice of evidence-based medicine and quality improvement and patient safety. Results: One hundred seventy residents returned the online questionnaire (54.7%). The respondents' gender and year of training were balanced (P > 0.05). The most common MR frequency and duration were five days per week (85.4%) and 45-60 minutes (47.1%), respectively. The most common format was handover combined with an emergency long case presentation (55.8%), and consultants were the most common facilitators (79.7%). The respondents' motivation to engage with MR was predominantly intermediate. The top reasons for attending and not attending MR were mandatory attendance and embarrassing questions, respectively. The perceived MR contribution to residents' different roles development was predominantly intermediate; however, it was predominantly very low/low (42%) for overall education. The perceived MR impact on the practice of EBM and QIPS were both predominantly intermediate. Conclusion: MR was found to be a commonly practiced educational activity in internal medicine residency training programs in the eastern province of Saudi Arabia. The case discussion was the core format for education. The respondents' motivation to participate in MR and their perception of its contribution to education was predominantly intermediate. To our best knowledge, this is the first study in Saudi Arabia that examined MR. We hope its findings will be taken for further MR studies and actions for improvement.

Creation of a Didactic Clinical Pharmacology Lecture Series for Internal Medicine Residents.

INTRODUCTION: One of the noted areas of weakness for internal medicine residents is pharmacology. However, there is little data documenting the creation and effect of a comprehensive pharmacology didactic program. Our goal was to create a two-year clinical pharmacology didactic program focused on areas of stated weakness and to evaluate this program for an increase in knowledge and prescribing confidence of the participants. METHODS: From August 2020 to June 2022, a two-year pharmacology program was developed, which included 20 didactic lectures on a variety of topics. Pre- and post-tests were given for 15 of the lectures, and four surveys were given, two during each year of the program. Four questions on each survey were the same and asked about confidence in choosing an appropriate medication based on current guidelines, patient-specific factors, primary literature, and pharmacokinetics. RESULTS:  Over the two years, participation in the pharmacology sessions ranged from 17 to 29 residents (65-74% of the residency class). The average pre- and post-test scores increased by an average of 25.1%, which was a statistically significant increase (p<0.001, 95% CI [17.5, 32.8]). A Kruskal-Wallis H test showed a statistically significant difference in resident-reported confidence adjusting medications based on primary literature between the different survey groups, χ2 = 9.871, p = 0.02. CONCLUSION: A two-year, didactic pharmacology program improved the knowledge of resident participants and confidence in their ability to choose an appropriate medication based on primary literature.

What internal medicine attendings talk about at morning report: a multicenter study.

BACKGROUND: Morning report is a core educational activity in internal medicine resident education. Attending physicians regularly participate in morning report and influence the learning environment, though no previous study has described the contribution of attending physicians to this conference. This study aims to describe attending comments at internal medicine morning reports. METHODS: We conducted a prospective, observational study of morning reports conducted at 13 internal medicine residency programs between September 1, 2020, and March 30, 2021. Each attending comment was described including its duration, whether the comment was teaching or non-teaching, teaching topic, and field of practice of the commenter. We also recorded morning report-related variables including number of learners, report format, program director participation, and whether report was scripted (facilitator has advance knowledge of the case). A regression model was developed to describe variables associated with the number of attending comments per report. RESULTS: There were 2,344 attending comments during 250 conferences. The median number of attendings present was 3 (IQR, 2-5). The number of comments per report ranged across different sites from 3.9 to 16.8 with a mean of 9.4 comments/report (SD, 7.4). 66% of comments were shorter than one minute in duration and 73% were categorized as teaching by observers. The most common subjects of teaching comments were differential diagnosis, management, and testing. Report duration, number of general internists, unscripted reports, and in-person format were associated with significantly increased number of attending comments. CONCLUSIONS: Attending comments in morning report were generally brief, focused on clinical teaching, and covered a wide range of topics. There were substantial differences between programs in terms of the number of comments and their duration which likely affects the local learning environment. Morning report stakeholders that are interested in increasing attending involvement in morning report should consider employing in-person and unscripted reports. Additional studies are needed to explore best practice models of attending participation in morning report.

Review of Hematology-Oncology Emergencies for Internal Medicine Residents.

The prevalence of cancer continues to grow globally every year. With therapeutic advances over the recent decades, the prevalence of individuals living with cancer continues to increase. Internal medicine residents can see patients admitted to the hospital for cancer-related emergencies. Early identification and appropriate management of these emergencies have been shown to improve mortality and morbidity. In this article, we aim to review the recent updates in the management of commonly encountered oncologic emergencies in the practice of internal medicine residents. This review will cover spinal cord compression, superior vena cava syndrome, tumor lysis syndrome, hypercalcemia, pericardial tamponade, hypoglycemia, hyponatremia, bowel obstruction, increased intracranial pressure, leukostasis, hyperviscosity syndrome, neutropenic fever, and hypersensitivity reactions.

Perceived Preparedness of Internal Medicine Interns for Residency and the Value of Transition to Residency Courses.

The popularity of Transition to Residency (TTR) courses has been increasing in U.S. medical schools. Yet there is limited data on interns' perceived preparation for residency and the value of nonsurgical TTR courses and their common components. Research has shown that TTR courses increase medical knowledge, clinical skills, and an increase in confidence in participants, but still, incoming residents do not feel prepared for the start of residency. Currently, there are only a few single institution studies researching interns' perceived value of TTR courses. This quantitative study surveyed internal medicine interns at five residency programs to find their preparation for residency, their preparedness in TTR competencies, and the perceived value of common TTR components. Data show that IM interns still feel unprepared for residency. The data also indicate that individuals who engage in TTR courses feel more prepared in TTR competencies compared to those who do not participate in TTR courses. Finally, internal medicine interns found the common TTR components valuable.

Low-Cost, Low-Resource Training Model to Enhance and Sustain Serious Illness Conversation Skills for Internal Medicine Residents.

Background: Funding and limited resources are barriers to required training of residents in serious illness conversation (SIC) skills. Objectives: To examine the effectiveness of a low-cost, low-resource (LCLR) SIC training embedded within a required palliative care rotation. Design: Pre-post prospective cohort study design. Setting/Subjects: Second year internal medicine (IM) residents received an LCLR three-hour training in the SIC Guide (SICG) with a single-faculty member and paired-participant practice replacing actors during a required two-week palliative medicine rotation. Measures: SIC competence checklist measured within simulated patient encounters longitudinally. Results: Twenty resident average SIC checklist scores improved from 11 (95% confidence interval [CI] 9-13) at the beginning of rotation to 19 (95% CI 17-20) at the end of rotation and 18 (95% CI 16-20) at six months after the rotation. Conclusions: LCLR SIC training for IM residents significantly increased the sustained use of basic SIC skills, but was less effective for more complex skills.

Gender and Sexual Diverse Health Education: A Needs Assessment Among Internal Medicine Residents.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to assess perception of competency and comfort level of internal medicine (IM) residents in caring for gender and sexual diverse (GSD) patients, and to identify residents' preferred educational modalities and perceived facilitators and barriers to GSD curriculum implementation. Methods: A survey was distributed among IM residents during a mandatory didactic session between November 9 and December 18, 2020. Categorical variables were analyzed using Fisher's exact test. Open-ended questions were analyzed using content and theme analysis. Results: Of 138 residents, 89 (64%) completed the survey. Residents had varying levels of comfort and perceived competence. Small group (n = 61, 69%) and case-based learning (n = 58, 66%) formats were preferred. Content and theme analysis resulted in four major themes on facilitators and three major themes on barriers to GSD curricular implementation. Conclusion: This study provides unique insight to facilitate implementation of a learner-centered and developmentally appropriate curricular approach to GSD health education.

Implementing Perioperative Cardiac Risk Assessment in an Internal Medicine Residency Program: Experience from a Community Hospital.

Background: ACGME requires all Internal Medicine training programs to structure the curriculum to optimize resident educational experiences, including perioperative medicine. Teaching residents about perioperative risk management is challenging in a community hospital with limited resources and low surgical volume. Objective: Our goal was to introduce an interactive educational module on perioperative cardiac risk assessment and management in a community residency training program. Methods: The study was a single-center online education-based intervention from September 2020 to January 2021. 24 categorical internal medicine residents at MetroWest Medical center were included. A self-paced online education program followed by two sessions of a 30-minute, group modulated review and discussion were provided monthly. The pre- and post-evaluation with 20 questions were conducted to assess perioperative cardiac risk assessment and peri-operative cardiac risk management before and after education. Results: 20 out of 24 residents (83%) were included in the analysis. Medicine residents performed significantly better after involvement with the educational module by comparing the pre- and post-evaluation score (10.7 ± 2.7 vs. 13.8 ± 1.8, p < 0.001, respectively). The most significant improvement was noticed in postgraduate year PGY-1 residents (5.1 ± 2.5, p < 0.001), followed by PGY-2 (2.7 ± 1.6, p = 0.004), but not significant in PGY-3 residents (1.6 ± 2.3, p > 0.05). Conclusion: Implementing an interactive multi-modular curriculum in a community hospital increased residents' awareness and knowledge of perioperative cardiac risk assessment and management. We are confident that this will result in improved performance on the consult services.