Transient Consciousness Disorder During Emergency Cesarean Section in Patients with Labor Analgesia.

A patient who was 39 weeks pregnant was admitted to the hospital to be expecting labor and performed labor analgesia when the uterine orifice was opened to 2 cm. We successfully performed L2.3 epidural puncture in the lumbar space and equipped her with a self-controlled epidural analgesia infusion pump (100mL, 10mL 1% ropivacaine + 50ug sufentanil + 89mL normal saline) with a load of 8mL for continuous delivery. Continuous infusion of 8mL/h, patient controlled analgesia (PCA) 6 mL/ time at 15 minute intervals. The analgesic effect is good. In the following 40 minutes or so, due to fetal monitoring, fetal heart rate variation deceleration accompanied by late deceleration, the minimum was reduced to 85 times/min, and there was no improvement after treatment, and then the obstetrician prepared to perform an emergency cesarean section. The anesthesiologist evaluated the patient and then chose an epidural. The epidural dose was 3mL 1% lidocaine +0.5% rox mixture, and 7mL 1% lidocaine +0.5% rox mixture was administered 3 minutes later. During the administration, the patient complained of unbearable headache and rapid loss of consciousness. Immediate organization rescue, uterine dissection, pressure oxygen, preparation of tracheal intubation, cardiopulmonary resuscitation, cardiovascular active drugs, etc. After about 1 minute, the patient regained consciousness, responded smoothly, the vital signs were stable, the anesthesia plane T8 was measured. The patient's surgery went smoothly, and there were no complications during postoperative follow-up. They were discharged 5 days later. Such cases are relatively rare, especially during cesarean section surgery has not been reported, so it is published for everyone's reference.

The impact of epidural ropivacaine versus levobupivacaine for labor analgesia on maternal and fetal outcomes: a meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Newer neuraxial local anesthetic agents which have been used as epidural analgesia have shown to provide reliable pain relief during labor. Ropivacaine and levobupivacaine are newer agents now used for labor analgesia. However, even though few studies have made their comparison with bupivacaine, ropivacaine and levobupivacaine have seldom systematically been compared. Therefore, in this analysis, we aimed to systematically show the impact of epidural ropivacaine versus levobupivacaine for labor analgesia on maternal and fetal outcomes. METHODS: http://www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov , Web of Science, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane database and Google Scholar were searched for studies comparing ropivacaine versus levobupivacaine for labor analgesia. Maternal and fetal outcomes were considered as the endpoints in this analysis. The RevMan software 5.4 was used to analyze data in this study. Risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were used to represent the data post analysis. RESULTS: A total number of 2062 participants were included in this analysis whereby 1054 participants were assigned to ropivacaine and 1008 participants were assigned to levobupivacaine. The main results of this analysis showed that epidural ropivacaine was not associated with significantly higher risk of hypotension (RR: 0.71, 95% CI: 0.43 - 1.17; P = 0.18) and pruritus (RR: 1.12, 95% CI: 0.89 - 1.42; P = 0.34) when compared to levobupivacaine for labor analgesia. However, the risk of nausea and vomiting was significantly higher with ropivacaine (RR: 1.60, 95% CI: 1.05 - 2.44; P = 0.03). Spontaneous vaginal delivery (RR: 0.99, 95% CI: 0.89 - 1.42; P = 0.83), instrumental vaginal delivery (RR: 1.13, 95% CI: 0.89 - 1.45; P = 0.32) and the risk for cesarean section (RR: 0.76, 95% CI: 0.42 - 1.37; P = 0.35) were not significantly different. When fetal outcomes were assessed, Apgar score < 7 at 1 min (RR: 1.01: 95% CI: 0.57 - 1.80; P = 0.97), abnormality of fetal heart rate (RR: 1.45, 95% CI: 0.55 - 3.79; P = 0.45) and neonatal asphyxia (RR: 0.35, 95% CI: 0.10 - 1.18; P = 0.09) were also similarly manifested. CONCLUSIONS: To conclude, our analysis showed both epidural ropivacaine and levobupivacaine to be equally effective for labor analgesia in terms of maternal and fetal outcomes. No major adverse maternal and fetal outcome was observed in this analysis. However, considering the several limitations of this analysis, further larger studies should be able to solve and clarify this issue.

Epidural injection of hydromorphone for postoperative pain after episiotomy: a randomized controlled trial.

Perineal incision resulting in post-partum pain and impact on puerperal life was the focus of our study. We recruited postpartum mothers who had undergone vaginal delivery to receive labor analgesia and episiotomy with an epidural injection of 0.5 mg hydromorphone to assess the therapeutic effects of postpartum analgesia. The participants were randomly allocated into two groups: the control group (Group NS) received an epidural injection of an equal amount of saline, while the study group (Group HY) received an epidural injection of 0.5 mg hydromorphone. We collected relevant data from electronic medical records to compare the differences between the two groups. The intervention group demonstrated lower pain scores at 4, 8, 12, 16, and 24 h compared to the control group (p < 0.001). Additionally, a higher number of patients in the control group required pain medication (7 (15.9%) compared to 2 (4.7%)). The time to first analgesia request in group NS was earlier than that in group HY (8.94 ± 1.27 h compared to 16.96 ± 3.38 h). The study group experienced higher rates of vomiting (P = 0.002) and itching (P < 0.001). However, there were no differences between the two groups in terms of urinary retention, dyskinesia, respiratory depression, dizziness, or neonatal feeding. The epidural injection of 0.5 mg hydromorphone proved to be effective in alleviating pain caused by maternal episiotomy and did not negatively affect neonatal feeding.Clinical trial registration: http://www.chictr.org.cn/usercenter.aspx identifier: ChiCTR2200064687.

Analysis of clinical application effects of Esketamine combining Sufentanil in labor analgesia and their impacts on postpartum depression.

Objective: To evaluate the clinical effects of Esketamine combining Sufentanil in labor analgesia and their impacts on postpartum depression. Methods: This was a retrospective study. One hundred and fifty primiparae with spontaneous labor were selected at SSL Central Hospital of Dongguan City from July 10, 2021 to May 10, 2022 as the research objects and randomly divided into two groups (each n=75). While the control group underwent epidural infusion of Sufentanil for analgesia, the study group was administered Esketamine combining Sufentanil. Compared analgesic effects, time of birth course, adverse reactions, pain intensity, scores assigned to depression and anxiety before analgesia and after delivery were made for pregnant women in both groups. Results: The response rates of the study and control groups reached 100% and 93%, respectively, with statistically significant differences (p=0.02). The time of the first, second, and third stages of labor in the study group were all significantly lower than that of the control group; showing statistical significance (p=0.00). Regarding adverse reactions showed no statistically significant differences (p=0.44). Moreover, the study group showed noticeably lower pain intensity than those of the control group during delivery, 20 minutes and one hour after delivery; and their differences were statistically significant (p=0.00). After delivery, both the SAS and SDS of the study group were respectively lower than those of the control group, with statistically significant differences as well (p=0.00). Conclusions: Applying Esketamine combining Sufentanil in epidural painless delivery produces rather favorable analgesic effects, shortens the time of the birth process, and improves postpartum anxiety and depression without leading to more adverse reactions.

Epidural Analgesia in a Parturient for Labor Analgesia After Surgical Correction of Spina Bifida.

This case report details the successful management of labor pain using epidural analgesia in a 22-year-old primigravid patient with a history of spina bifida and extensive surgical repair. Spina bifida, a congenital neural tube defect, presents unique challenges for neuraxial anesthesia due to altered spinal anatomy and potential neurological deficits. Despite these complexities, effective pain relief was achieved through careful patient counseling, comprehensive pre-procedural planning, and meticulous technique. Upon admission for labor induction due to preeclampsia, a physical examination revealed significant lumbar scarring with obscure anatomical landmarks. Despite these challenges, informed consent was obtained, and an epidural catheter was successfully placed using palpable bony prominences above the presumed T12-L1 interspace. A standard midline approach with saline loss of resistance technique was employed, epidural space was confirmed at a depth of 5 cm, and a catheter was placed. Continuous patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) comprising fentanyl and ropivacaine provided consistent pain relief throughout a 17-hour labor period, maintaining a dermatome level of T10. Post-delivery, neurosurgical evaluation confirmed successful catheter removal without complications, and the patient exhibited normal neurological function. This case underscores the importance of individualized pain management strategies in patients with spina bifida, necessitating thorough risk-benefit assessment, detailed patient education, and interdisciplinary collaboration for optimal outcomes. Despite the inherent challenges, epidural analgesia can be a viable option with careful planning and execution, contributing to improved maternal comfort and satisfaction during labor and delivery for patients with a history of spina bifida.

Global research trends in labor analgesia: A bibliometric analysis from 2013 to 2023.

Objective: In the past decade, thousands of original articles focus on labor analgesia have published. However, little has been published in the literature that includes a bibliometric analysis of labor analgesia. Therefore, this study is designed to analyze the current status of research on labor analgesia over the past ten years and explore potential directions for the future. Methods: We retrieved the Web of Science Core Collection (WOSCC) for labor analgesia articles published from 2013 to 2023 and extracted the data from the literature. To perform the bibliometric analysis, we used CiteSpace (6.2. R5) and VOS viewer (1.6.19) as our primary analysis tools. Results: A total of 2406 articles were included, and the number of publications has increased steadily in the last ten years. The United States was the leading contributor to the area, and Harvard University was the most productive institution. The American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology was the most cited and influential journal. The most co-cited reference was "Epidural versus non-epidural or no analgesia for pain management in labour". The labels of the co-citation cluster have identified the characteristics of 5major clusters, such as "postpartum depression", "programmed intermittent epidural bolus", "childbirth experience" "intrapartum maternal fever" and "dural puncture", which play important roles in this field. Keywords co-occurrence and keywords burst detection showed that "vaginal birth", "postpartum depression", "maternal fever", "inflammation", "systematic review", "guidelines", "decreased risk" and "scale" were the most recent and most prominent topics of labor analgesia. Discussion: This study provided a global review of labor analgesia using bibliometric and visual techniques to provide an intuitive understanding of this topic and identify hotspots and research trends. Notably, intrapartum fever and postpartum depression have emerged as hotpots and trends in labor analgesia research, reflecting the current research landscape.

Predictive value of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio on admission for intrapartum maternal fever in parturients undergoing epidural analgesia: A retrospective cohort study using propensity score-matched analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To identify the predictive value of the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) on admission for intrapartum maternal fever in parturients undergoing epidural analgesia (EA). METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, propensity score matching (PSM) was applied to address covariates. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were implemented in sequence to find out the factors influencing intrapartum fever. The receiver operating characteristics curve was applied to determine the area under the curve (AUC) of NLR for intrapartum fever. RESULTS: NLR and duration of EA were independent risk factors for intrapartum fever. The AUC of the combined indicator (NLR + duration of EA) was higher than that of NLR (AUC = 0.583, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.53-0.64) and duration of EA (AUC = 0.702, 95% CI 0.66-0.75), reaching 0.715 (95% CI 0.67-0.76; p < 0.001). NLR increased predictive performance for intrapartum fever when added to the duration of EA (net reclassification index 0.076, p = 0.022; integrated discrimination improvement 0.020, p = 0.002). CONCLUSION: NLR has limited predictive power for intrapartum fever. The combination of NLR and duration of epidural analgesia may be considered a promising predictor for intrapartum maternal fever in parturients undergoing epidural analgesia. SYNOPSIS: The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio is an accessible predictor for the early identification of parturients at risk of intrapartum fever.

Impact of nitrous oxide use on parturient recall of neuraxial analgesia risks.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Nitrous oxide affects memory and recall. We aimed to determine if using nitrous oxide during labor affected patients' ability to learn and recall the risks and benefits of neuraxial analgesia. DESIGN: Single-center, prospective cohort study. SETTING: Labor and delivery unit in a large academic medical center. PATIENTS: Nulliparous patients with spontaneous or planned induction of labor. INTERVENTIONS: Parturients chose whether to use nitrous oxide during labor. At the discussion for epidural consent, 4 risks were described: headache, infection, nerve damage, bleeding. MEASUREMENTS: Labor pain score, time from nitrous oxide discontinuation, and cervical dilation were documented at the discussion of epidural risks. Patients were assessed for unprompted recall and prompted recall of epidural risks on postpartum day 1 and unprompted recall at postpartum week 6. The number and proportion of patients who indicated each true risk (unprompted and prompted recall) or distractor (prompted recall only) were summarized by treatment group and results compared using Pearson χ2 tests. MAIN RESULTS: Of the 403 enrolled patients, 294 (73%) did not use nitrous oxide, and 109 (27%) did. The 2 groups were similar except women who used nitrous oxide were more likely to be cared for by midwives and had higher pain scores at their epidural request. Scores for unprompted or prompted recall of epidural risks were not different between women who received or did not receive nitrous oxide. All 4 risks were recalled unprompted by only 3% in the nitrous oxide group and by 6% in the group not receiving nitrous oxide (P = .18). CONCLUSIONS: The use of nitrous oxide for labor analgesia does not adversely influence a parturient's ability to recall the risks of epidural placement. Patients who receive nitrous oxide for labor analgesia should be considered eligible to provide consent for subsequent procedures.

Role of lumbar puncture level on the onset of epidural labor analgesia: a randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the speed of achieving painless uterine contractions in parturients undergoing epidural analgesia at different lumbar puncture levels. METHODS: This study is a randomized controlled trial at a tertiary A hospital with a history of over 80 years in Sichuan Province, China. Parturients aged 22-40 years old scheduled for vaginal delivery under epidural analgesia were recruited. Eligible patients were randomly allocated into lumbar 2-3 (L2-3) or lumbar 3-4 (L3-4) groups. Epidural analgesia was performed through the interspaces according to grouping. The primary outcome was the percentage of painless uterine contractions 15 min after the initiation of analgesia. The secondary outcomes included the percentage of painless status at 5 and 10 min, sensory block plane, motor block evaluation, adverse events of parturients, epidural analgesic consumption, Apgar score, and the parturients' evaluation of analgesia. RESULTS: Between April 2023 and August 2023, a total of 150 women were finally recruited, and 136 of them were analyzed (68 in each group). In comparison with the L3-4 groups, there was a significantly larger proportion of painless uterine contractions at 5, 10, and 15 min after analgesia initiation in the L2-3 group (20.6% vs. 7.4%, 52.9% vs. 26.5%, and 80.9% vs. 64.7%, P = .026, .002, and .034, respectively). Similarly, the pain scores were lower in the L2-3 group at 5, 10, and 15 min than that in the L3-4 group (5(4,7) vs. 6(5,7), 3(2,5) vs. 4(3,6), and 2(1,3) vs. 3(2,5), P = .006, .004, and .020, respectively). Furthermore, puncturing through the L2-3 interspace contributed to a higher evaluation of parturients to the analgesia procedure (9(8,9) vs. 8(8,9), P < .001). However, there was no significant difference in sensory block, motor block, or adverse events between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Puncturing through the L2-3 interspace is associated with faster pain relief and a better experience for parturients. These findings present a superior option for anesthesiologists when conducting epidural labor analgesia. Key messages What is already known on this topic?  Epidural analgesia is an effective way to relieve labor pain. What this study adds?  Puncturing via lumbar 2-3 interspace induces more rapid onset of epidural analgesia. How this study might affect research, practice or policy?  Lumbar 2-3 interspace is a superior option in terms of the speed of pain relief and satisfaction of parturients when conducting epidural labor analgesia.

Epidural Block in a Patient With Melkersson-Rosenthal Syndrome: A Case Report.

This case report describes the first known application of an epidural block for labor analgesia in a patient with Melkersson-Rosenthal syndrome (MRS), a rare disorder that may present sudden and threatening airway complications. A tailored epidural protocol effectively mitigated symptom exacerbation, facilitating a complication-free vaginal delivery. This report not only enriches the sparse literature on anesthesia in patients with MRS but also provides a crucial review of perioperative considerations for administering either general or regional anesthesia in similar cases.

Knowledge, Attitude, and Practices of Labor Analgesia Amongst Obstetric Residents: A Cross-Sectional Survey.

BACKGROUND: Labor analgesia plays a crucial role in ensuring a comfortable and positive birthing experience. It provides physiological benefits to both the mother and the child. Knowledge, awareness, and communication between the anesthesiologist and the obstetrician are essential for the safe conduct of labor analgesia. We conducted this cross-sectional online survey amongst obstetric residents to assess their knowledge, attitude, and practices of labor analgesia. METHODS: A structured questionnaire consisting of 19 questions was circulated amongst obstetric residents of various hospitals via electronic mode of communication. The responses were analyzed using statistical methods. RESULTS: Among the obstetric residents that we surveyed, 75.7% of them only sometimes employed labor analgesia for their patients. The most commonly employed methods of pain relief are opioids and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID). Most of them feel that pain-free labor is necessary because it makes the whole labor process a pleasurable one. Labor analgesia was mostly advocated at patients' request and demand. The barrier to using labor analgesia was most commonly found to be the non-availability of labor analgesia services. CONCLUSION: Despite the increasing awareness of labor analgesia there still lies a gap between the attitude toward it and the practice of it. Further education to rectify the misconceptions and barriers needs to be taken for providing beneficial services to pregnant females.

Determinants and willingness to practice obstetric analgesia among women attending antenatal clinic at Dr. Bogalech Gebre Memorial General Hospital Central Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: Labor pain is uniquely experienced and described by the woman giving birth, and it is often considered one of the most excruciating experiences for many women. This study aimed to evaluate factors associated with the willingness to receive labor analgesia among women attending the antenatal clinic at Dr. Bogalech Gebre Memorial General Hospital Central Ethiopia in 2022. METHODS: An institution-based, cross-sectional study was conducted from January to March 2022. Data were collected using semi-structured questionnaires by a convenience sampling technique. Data was entered in EpiData 4.2 and exported to SPSS version 20 for analysis. Both Bivariable and multivariable logistic regressions were conducted to determine factors associated with pregnant women's willingness to choose labor analgesia. Crude odds ratio (COR) and adjusted odds ratio (AOR) were computed to assess the association between variables. RESULTS: A total of 398 pregnant women have participated in the study with a response rate of 94%. Nearly 30%, (29.4%) of the pregnant women had a willingness to practice labor pain management. Being a housewife (AOR: 8.35, 95% CI: 2.07, 33.63). Women who live in urban (AOR: 2.60, 95% CI: 1.29, 5.29). Having had awareness about labor analgesia (AOR: 1.70, 95% CI: 1.00, 2.60) and the short duration of labor time (AOR: 1.84, 95% CI: 1.15, 2.96) were statistically significant with a willingness to practice labor analgesia. CONCLUSION: We conclude that the willingness of pregnant mothers' toward obstetric analgesia practice was low in the study area. Being a housewife, urban residence, awareness about labor analgesia, and short duration of labor were statistically significant with the willingness of the mothers to practice labor analgesia. To increase willingness to use labor analgesia, authorities should prioritize delivering health education on pain management choices to address concerns and promote effective methods and practices.

Childbirth Experience and Pain Control: Expectation, Satisfaction, and Analgesia Myths.

BACKGROUND: In our days, increasing importance has been given to maternal satisfaction as a quality indicator in healthcare services. A positive childbirth experience should meet a woman's personal and sociocultural beliefs and expectations in every setting. This study aimed to evaluate childbirth experience regarding expectations, satisfaction, and myths around epidural analgesia. METHODOLOGY: A cross-sectional survey designed was carried out in the Obstetric Department of a public hospital in Madeira-Portugal. A well-structured questionnaire was applied to 101 post-partum women covering aspects such as sociodemographic details, childbirth expectations, overall satisfaction, and prevailing myths. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 26.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY) was used for data analysis. RESULTS: From the total of 101 participants, 32 (31%) women belonged to the 31-35 age group. Among the respondents, 58 (57%) had attained a high school diploma. The results showed that there was a positive experience with childbirth; out of the total women, 79 (78%) considered it exceeded their expectations. The majority of pregnant women (93, 92%) received neuraxial analgesia for labor, reporting the experience as good or excellent. The overall satisfaction related to the birth experience was good or excellent for 88 (87%) women. Regarding the myths, education level was significantly associated with the myth Epidurals often cause permanent back pain (P < 0.05), since women with higher education don't believe them. CONCLUSIONS: The result of this study proves that, despite the high level of satisfaction with the labor and delivery experience found in our maternity unit, satisfaction remains a complex and dynamic phenomenon.

Real-time analgesic efficacy and factors determining drug requirements of combined spinal-epidural analgesia for labor: a prospective cohort study.

PURPOSE: Combined spinal-epidural analgesia (CSEA) is effective but not sufficient for labor pain. This study was conducted to assess the real-time analgesic efficacy, side effects of anesthetic drug dosage, and maternal satisfaction in labor to provide reference for the optimization of labor analgesia. METHODS: This was a prospective, cohort, single-center study that included 3020 women who received CSEA for labor analgesia. The visual analogue scale (VAS) for labor pain, real-time anesthetic drug dosage, side effects, adverse labor outcomes, factors influencing average drug dosage, and maternal satisfaction with CSEA were assessed. RESULTS: Overall, the VAS labor pain score was lowest at the first hour after the anesthesia was given. After 4 h for primiparas and 3 h for multiparas, the VAS score was greater than 3 but the anesthetic drug dosage did not reach the maximum allowed dosage at the same time. The average anesthetic drug dosage was positively correlated with fever, urinary retention, uterine atony, prolonged active phase, prolonged second stage, assisted vaginal delivery, and postpartum hemorrhage. The average anesthetic drug dosage was the highest in women ≤ 20 years old, those with a body mass index (BMI) ≥ 24.9 kg/m2, and those with a primary or secondary education level. CONCLUSION: Appropriate age guidance and emphasis on education of labor analgesia, weight management during pregnancy, and real-time anesthetic dosage adjustment during labor based on VAS pain score may have positive effects on the satisfaction of labor analgesia. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER AND REGISTRY: Clinicaltrials.gov (ChiCTR2100051809).

Influence of smoking and socioeconomic status on labor analgesia: a nationwide register-based study in Finland.

PURPOSE: Labor pain can be treated by medical and non-medical analgesia. Smoking during pregnancy has been shown to increase the incidence of several complications and may influence analgesic effectiveness. Previous studies have linked socioeconomic status to the use of epidurals for labor analgesia. We aimed to determine whether smoking and socioeconomic status influence the use of labor analgesia in Finland. METHODS: From January 1, 2004 to December 31, 2018, we collected data from the national Finnish Medical Birth Register on smoking status, labor analgesia, and socioeconomic status during pregnancy. These categorized variables were presented as absolute numbers and percentages. We included data on singleton pregnancies and excluded any data on pregnancies that missed smoking or socioeconomic status. RESULTS: 71,603 women smoked during the first trimester, 42,079 women continued to smoke after the first trimester, and 641,449 were non-smokers. The four most used labor analgesia were nitrous oxide, epidural, other medical analgesia, and non-medical analgesia. The most frequently used analgesia was nitrous oxide, which was used by 60.8% of the group of smokers after the first trimester, 58.8% of smokers during the first trimester, and 54.5% of non-smokers. There were no substantial differences between socioeconomic status classes and labor analgesia used. CONCLUSION: Women who continued smoking after the first trimester used labor analgesia more often than non-smokers. There were no clear differences between socioeconomic status classes and labor analgesia used. These findings highlight the need to reduce maternal smoking during pregnancy, and universal social healthcare systems should promote equality in labor analgesia.

Sacral sensory blockade from 27-gauge pencil-point dural puncture epidural analgesia or epidural analgesia in laboring nulliparous parturients: a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: The dural puncture epidural (DPE) technique has been associated with better sacral analgesia compared with a traditional epidural (EPL) technique in laboring parturients. The aim of this study was to investigate whether DPE with a 27-gauge pencil-point needle compared with a traditional EPL technique produces more rapid bilateral sacral blockade in nulliparous parturients. METHODS: Patients were randomized to a DPE or EPL technique. Epidural analgesia in both groups was initiated with ropivacaine 0.1% and sufentanil 0.5 µg/mL (15 mL) and maintained via programmed intermittent epidural boluses. Analgesic blockade was tested bilaterally beginning 10 min after initiation, and then at predefined intervals until delivery. The presence of an S2 blockade at 20 min was the primary outcome. RESULTS: Among 108 (54 per group) patients enrolled, bilateral sacral (S2) blockade at 20 min was significantly more common in the DPE than in the EPL group [47 (87%) vs. 23 (43%), absolute risk reduction (ARR) 44%, 95% CI 28 to 60; P < 0.001]. Time to a numeric pain rating scale score (0-10 scale) ≤ 3 (20 [20,30] min in both groups, HR 1.15, 95% CI 0.77 to 1.15; P = 0.50), number of rescue doses [0 (0, 1) vs 0 (0, 1); P 0.08], and presence of bilateral S2 blockade at delivery were not significantly different between groups. CONCLUSIONS: The DPE technique with a 27-gauge pencil-point spinal needle more often provides bilateral sacral blockade at 20 min following block initiation compared with the EPL technique. The time to adequate analgesia and need for supplemental analgesia did not appear to differ between techniques.

Sublingual sufentanil for patient-controlled analgesia during labor induction for pregnancy termination: an effective and well-tolerated approach.

BACKGROUND: Effective pain management during labor induction for pregnancy termination is essential. However, to date, no effective treatment has been identified. The primary aim of this study was to measure the analgesic efficacy of a sufentanil sublingual tablet system during pregnancy termination and patient satisfaction by comparing nulliparous and multiparous women. The secondary aims were to characterize the safety profile by reporting any side effects or adverse events and to determine the need for rescue therapy. METHODS: We conducted an observational, retrospective, single-center study involving 48 women. The data retrieved for analysis included the total and hourly doses of sublingual sufentanil, evaluations of pain management satisfaction using a 5-point rating scale (ranging from 1, indicating "not satisfied" to 5, denoting "completely satisfied"), occurrence of side effects and adverse events, and the rate of rescue analgesic use. Categorical and numerical variables were compared between the two groups, and a correlation analysis was performed. RESULTS: The median total dose of sufentanil required was 60 mcg. Nulliparous women required a higher dose of sufentanil compared with multiparous women (105 mcg vs. 45 mcg; P = 0.01). Additionally, they underwent a longer labor, indirectly measured by the time of device usage (625 min vs. 165 min; P = 0.05). Regarding satisfaction, 40 patients (83.4%) were satisfied or completely satisfied, whereas only 8 patients (16.6%) reported dissatisfaction. Multiparous women exhibited higher satisfaction levels than did nulliparous women (P = 0.03). No adverse events were reported, and the most common side effects were nausea and vomiting (31.2%). Four patients (12%) required acetaminophen due to insufficient analgesia, with only one patient necessitating a switch to intravenous morphine. CONCLUSIONS: Sublingual sufentanil was effective in both nulliparous and multiparous women with minimal side effects. Therefore, sublingual sufentanil can be considered a valid strategy for analgesia during labor induction for pregnancy termination.

Challenges with two epidural catheters for labor analgesia in a patient with lumbar adhesions: a case report.

BACKGROUND: The efficacy of neuraxial analgesia varies with spinal canal pathology. Notably, a secondary epidural catheter has been shown to increase neuraxial labor analgesia in women with spinal lesions. Therefore, we present a case in which catheter withdrawal played a critical role in achieving effective labor analgesia in a woman with epidural adhesions after lumbar discectomy who had inadequate analgesia with two epidural catheters. CASE PRESENTATION: We encountered a patient with L5 lumbar epidural adhesions who reported pain even after receiving two epidural catheters. The catheters were placed in the L1/2 and L5/S intervertebral spaces. Analgesic effects were exerted when the L5/S catheter was withdrawn by 1 cm, suggesting that the catheter tip was initially placed inside the adhesion. CONCLUSIONS: Careful consideration of catheter placement and adjustments by withdrawing the catheter are crucial in managing labor analgesia in patients with known epidural adhesions.

Programmed Intermittent Epidural Bolus Reduces Workloads in Labor Analgesia: A Single Center's Experience.

Background and Objectives: Labor epidural analgesia can be maintained through programmed intermittent epidural bolus (PIEB), continuous epidural infusion (CEI), or patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA). Our department changed from CEI+PCEA to PIEB+PCEA as the maintenance method. The higher hourly dose setting in the current regimen brought to our concern that side effects would increase with proportional staff workloads. This study aimed to investigate the validity of our proposal that PIEB+PCEA may function as a feasible tool in reducing the amount of work in the obstetrics anesthesia units. Materials and methods: This 2-year retrospective review included parturients with vaginal deliveries under epidural analgesia. We compared the staff burden before and after the switch from CEI (6 mL/h, PCEA 6 mL lockout 15 min, group A) to PIEB (8 mL/h, PCEA 8 mL lockout 10 min, group B). The primary outcome was the difference of proportion of parturients requiring unscheduled visits between groups. Side effects and labor and neonatal outcomes were compared. Results: Of the 694 parturients analyzed, the proportion of those requiring unscheduled visits were significantly reduced in group B (20.8% vs. 27.7%, chi-square test, p = 0.033). The multivariate logistic regression showed that PIEB was associated with fewer unscheduled visits than CEI (OR = 0.53, 95% CI [0.36-0.80], p < 0.01). Group B exhibited a significantly lower incidence of asymmetric blockade, as well as motor blockade. In nulliparous subjects, obstetric anal sphincter injury occurred less frequently when PIEB+PCEA was used. Significantly more multiparous women experienced vacuum extraction delivery in group B than in group A, and they had a longer second stage of labor. Conclusions: The PIEB+PCEA protocol in our study reduced workloads in labor epidural analgesia as compared to CEI+PCEA, despite that a higher dose of analgesics was administered. Future studies are warranted to investigate the effect of manipulating the PIEB settings on the labor outcomes.

Effect of dural puncture epidural block technique on fetal heart rate variability during labor analgesia.

PURPOSE: To explore the effect of dural puncture epidural (DPE) block technique on fetal heart rate variability (HRV) during labor analgesia. METHODS: Sixty full-term primiparas who were in our hospital from April 2021 to October 2021 were selected and randomized into epidural analgesia (CEA) and dural puncture epidural analgesia (DPEA) groups (n = 30). After a successful epidural puncture, routine epidural catheter (EC) was performed in CEA group, and spinal anesthesia needle (as an EC) was used to puncture the dura mater to subarachnoid space in DPE group. Anesthetics were injected through EC. The time when the temperature sensation plane reached T10 (W1) and visual analog pain score (VAS), baseline heart rate score, amplitude variation score, cycle variation score, acceleration score, deceleration score, and total score of the first contraction after W1 were recorded. Apgar scores at 1 min, 5 min, and 10 min of neonates after delivery were recorded. RESULTS: The onset time of anesthesia in CEA group was significantly longer than that in DPEA group (p < .05). However, there are no significant differences in W1, VAS, baseline heart rate score, amplitude variation score, cycle variation score, acceleration score, deceleration score, and total score of the first contraction after W1 between the two groups (p > .05). Moreover, the Apgar scores at 1 min, 5 min and 10 min of neonates after delivery were not notably different between the two groups (p > .05). CONCLUSION: Compared with CEA, DPE block technique in labor analgesia relieves maternal pain without adverse effects on fetal HRV and newborns.