BRACNAC: A BRCA1 and BRCA2 Copy Number Alteration Caller from Next-Generation Sequencing Data.

Detecting copy number variations (CNVs) and alterations (CNAs) in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes is essential for testing patients for targeted therapy applicability. However, the available bioinformatics tools were initially designed for identifying CNVs/CNAs in whole-genome or -exome (WES) NGS data or targeted NGS data without adaptation to the BRCA1/2 genes. Most of these tools were tested on sample cohorts of limited size, with their use restricted to specific library preparation kits or sequencing platforms. We developed BRACNAC, a new tool for detecting CNVs and CNAs in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes in NGS data of different origin. The underlying mechanism of this tool involves various coverage normalization steps complemented by CNV probability evaluation. We estimated the sensitivity and specificity of our tool to be 100% and 94%, respectively, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 94%. The estimation was performed using the NGS data obtained from 213 ovarian and prostate cancer samples tested with in-house and commercially available library preparation kits and additionally using multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) (12 CNV-positive samples). Using freely available WES and targeted NGS data from other research groups, we demonstrated that BRACNAC could also be used for these two types of data, with an AUC of up to 99.9%. In addition, we determined the limitations of the tool in terms of the minimum number of samples per NGS run (≥20 samples) and the minimum expected percentage of CNV-negative samples (≥80%). We expect that our findings will improve the efficacy of BRCA1/2 diagnostics. BRACNAC is freely available at the GitHub server.

Spectrum of variants in a large Chinese Gitelman syndrome cohort.

Gitelman syndrome (GS) is caused by SLC12A3 biallelic variants. A previous study showed that large rearrangements (LRGs) of SLC12A3 accounted for the low sensitivity of genetic testing. However, a systematic screening for LRGs in Chinese GS patients is lacking. Massively parallel sequencing (MPS) and multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) were performed to sequence the genomic DNA of patients with clinically diagnosed GS. Of 165 index cases, MPS identified 151 cases with two or more affected alleles and 14 cases with one variant allele. LRGs were detected by MLPA in 20 out of 27 cases, including 15 cases with suspected LRGs by MPS. Among these 20 cases with LRGs, the results of MPS and MLPA were identical in only 8 cases. Additional LRGs in 6 cases were detected by MLPA alone. In 6 cases, E4_E6del was identified by MPS, while E4_E5del and Intron6del were identified by MLPA. Among the 102 distinct variants, 30 are novel. LRGs were found in 20 cases (12.1%). LRGs were found in 12.1% of our Chinese GS patients cohort. We show that MPS and MLPA are two complementary techniques with the ability to improve the diagnostic yield of GS.

The landscape of BRCA1 and BRCA2 large rearrangements in an international cohort of over 20 000 ovarian tumors identified using next-generation sequencing.

BACKGROUND: Approximately half of ovarian tumors have defects within the homologous recombination repair pathway. Tumors carrying pathogenic variants (PVs) in BRCA1/BRCA2 are more likely to respond to poly-ADP ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitor treatment. Large rearrangements (LRs) are a challenging class of variants to identify and characterize in tumor specimens and may therefore be underreported. This study describes the prevalence of pathogenic BRCA1/BRCA2 LRs in ovarian tumors and discusses the importance of their identification using a comprehensive testing strategy. METHODS: Sequencing and LR analyses of BRCA1/BRCA2 were conducted in 20 692 ovarian tumors received between March 18, 2016 and February 14, 2023 for MyChoice CDx testing. MyChoice CDx uses NGS dosage analysis to detect LRs in BRCA1/BRCA2 genes using dense tiling throughout the coding regions and limited flanking regions. RESULTS: Of the 2217 PVs detected, 6.3% (N = 140) were LRs. Overall, 0.67% of tumors analyzed carried a pathogenic LR. The majority of detected LRs were deletions (89.3%), followed by complex LRs (5.7%), duplications (4.3%), and retroelement insertions (0.7%). Notably, 25% of detected LRs encompassed a single or partial single exon. This study identified 84 unique LRs, 2 samples each carried 2 unique LRs in the same gene. We identified 17 LRs that occurred in multiple samples, some of which were specific to certain ancestries. Several cases presented here illustrate the intricacies involved in characterizing LRs, particularly when multiple events occur within the same gene. CONCLUSIONS: Over 6% of PVs detected in the ovarian tumors analyzed were LRs. It is imperative for laboratories to utilize testing methodologies that will accurately detect LRs at a single exon resolution to optimize the identification of patients who may benefit from PARP inhibitor treatment.

Clinical Benefits of Olaparib in Mexican Ovarian Cancer Patients With Founder Mutation BRCA1-Del ex9-12.

Background: Ovarian cancer (OC) is gynecologic cancer with the highest mortality rate. It is estimated that 13-17% of ovarian cancers are due to heritable mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2. The BRCA1 (BRCA1-Del ex9-12) Mexican founder mutation is responsible for 28-35% of the cases with ovarian cancer. The aim was to describe the PFS of OC patients treated with olaparib, emphasizing patients carrying the Mexican founder mutation (BRCA1-Del ex9-12). Methods: In this observational study, of 107 patients with BRCAm, 35 patients were treated with olaparib from November 2016 to May 2021 at the Ovarian Cancer Program (COE) of Mexico; patient information was extracted from electronic medical records. Results: Of 311 patients, 107 (34.4%) were with BRCAm; 71.9% (77/107) were with BRCA1, of which 27.3% (21/77) were with BRCA1-Del ex9-12, and 28.1% (30/107) were with BRCA2 mutations. Only 35 patients received olaparib treatment, and the median follow-up was 12.87 months. The PFS of BRCA1-Del ex9-12 was NR (non-reach); however, 73% of the patients received the treatment at 36 vs. 11.59 months (95% CI; 10.43-12.75) in patients with other BRCAm (p = 0.008). Almost 50% of patients required dose reduction due to toxicity; the most frequent adverse events were hematological in 76.5% and gastrointestinal in 4%. Conclusion: Mexican OC BRCA1-Del ex9-12 patients treated with olaparib had a significant increase in PFS regardless of the line of treatment compared to other mutations in BRCA.

CDH1 Germline Variants in a Tunisian Cohort with Hereditary Diffuse Gastric Carcinoma.

Mutational screening of the CDH1 gene is a standard treatment for patients who fulfill Hereditary Diffuse Gastric Cancer (HDGC) testing criteria. In this framework, the classification of variants found in this gene is a crucial step for the clinical management of patients at high risk for HDGC. The aim of our study was to identify CDH1 as well as CTNNA1 mutational profiles predisposing to HDGC in Tunisia. Thirty-four cases were included for this purpose. We performed Sanger sequencing for the entire coding region of both genes and MLPA (Multiplex Ligation Probe Amplification) assays to investigate large rearrangements of the CDH1 gene. As a result, three cases, all with the HDGC inclusion criteria (8.82% of the entire cohort), carried pathogenic and likely pathogenic variants of the CDH1 gene. These variants involve a novel splicing alteration, a missense c.2281G > A detected by Sanger sequencing, and a large rearrangement detected by MLPA. No pathogenic CTNNA1 variants were found. The large rearrangement is clearly pathogenic, implicating a large deletion of two exons. The novel splicing variant creates a cryptic site. The missense variant is a VUS (Variant with Uncertain Significance). With ACMG (American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics) classification and the evidence available, we thus suggest a revision of its status to likely pathogenic. Further functional studies or cosegregation analysis should be performed to confirm its pathogenicity. In addition, molecular exploration will be needed to understand the etiology of the other CDH1- and CTNNA1-negative cases fulfilling the HDGC inclusion criteria.

A large extended family with hyperparathyroidism-jaw tumor syndrome due to deletion of the third exon of CDC73: clinical and molecular features.

PURPOSE: We described the phenotype of a large 4-generation family with Hyperparathyrodism-Jaw Tumor syndrome (HPT-JT) associated with a rare deletion of exon 3 of the CDC73 gene. METHODS: We collected medical, genetic data on 24 family members descended from a common ancestor carrying a heterozygous deletion of exon 3. RESULTS: Thirteen carried the deletion, the penetrance was estimated at 50% at 40 years. Seven patients (39 ± 14.5 years) presented with HPT which could start at 13. Median plasmatic calcium and PTH levels were 3.13 ± 0.7 mmol/L and 115 ± 406 pg/ml, respectively. Kidney disease related to hypercalcemia were present in 57.1% of patients. All seven patients underwent surgery to remove a single parathyroid adenoma. One recurrence occurred 7 years post-surgery. No parathyroid carcinoma has been found to date. We found two atypical parathyroid adenomas. We described an additional somatic variant in exon 1 of gene CDC73 in two tumors. Jaw tumors were not necessarily associated with hyperparathyroidism, as shown in one case. Two kidney cysts were also reported. Variable phenotype expressivity was emphasized by clinical presentations in 2 monozygotic twins: acute hypercalcemia, kidney failure and ossifying fibroma in one twin, versus normocalcemic parathyroid adenoma in the other one. CONCLUSION: We report a family carrier of a deletion of exon 3 of the CDC73 gene. This is characterized by a high level of hypercalcemia, deleterious kidney effects and atypical parathyroid adenomas without carcinomas. Onset and intensity of HPT remain unpredictable. The additional somatic mutation found in the parathyroid tumor could lead to these phenotypical variations.

Detection of large rearrangements in a hereditary pan-cancer panel using next-generation sequencing.

BACKGROUND: Healthcare providers increasingly use information about pathogenic variants in cancer predisposition genes, including sequence variants and large rearrangements (LRs), in medical management decisions. While sequence variant detection is typically robust, LRs can be difficult to detect and characterize and may be underreported as a cause for hereditary cancer risk. This report describes the outcomes of hereditary cancer genetic testing using a comprehensive strategy that employs next-generation sequencing (NGS) for LR detection, coupled with LR confirmation using repeat hybrid capture NGS, microarray comparative genomic hybridization (microarray-CGH), and/or multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA). METHODS: Sequencing and LR analysis were conducted in a consecutive series of 376,159 individuals who received clinical testing with a hereditary pan-cancer gene panel from September 2013 through May 2017. NGS dosage analysis was used to evaluate potential deletions or duplications, with controls in place to exclude pseudogene reads. Samples positive for a putative LR based on NGS were confirmed using a comprehensive approach that included targeted microarray-CGH and/or MLPA analysis, with further examination as needed to ascertain the nature of the LR. RESULTS: A total of 3461 LRs were identified and classified as a deleterious mutation (DM), suspected deleterious mutation (SDM) or variant of uncertain significance. Pathogenic LRs (DM/SDM) accounted for the majority of LRs (67.7%), the largest proportion of which were deletions (86.1%), followed by duplications (11.3%), insertions (1.8%), triplications (0.5%), and inversions (0.3%). Several cases presented illustrate that the laboratory approach employed here can ensure consistent identification and accurate characterization of LRs. In the absence of this comprehensive testing strategy, 9% of LRs identified in this testing population might have been missed, potentially leading to inappropriate medical management in as many as 210 individuals referred for hereditary cancer testing. CONCLUSIONS: These data show that copy number analysis using NGS coupled with confirmatory testing reliably detects and characterizes LRs. Further, LRs comprise a substantial proportion (7.2%) of pathogenic variants identified by the test. A robust and accurate LR identification strategy is an essential component of a high-quality genetic testing program, enabling clinicians to optimize patient medical management decisions.

Hereditary cancer testing challenges: assembling the analytical pieces to solve the patient clinical puzzle.

Expanded genetic test utilization to guide cancer management has driven the development of larger gene panels and greater diversity in the patient population pursuing testing, resulting in increased identification of atypical or technically challenging genetic findings. To ensure appropriate patient care, it is critical that genetic tests adequately identify and characterize these findings. We describe genetic testing challenges frequently encountered by our laboratory and the methodologies we employ to improve test accuracy for the identification and characterization of atypical genetic findings. While these findings may be individually rare, 15,745 (9%) individuals tested by our laboratory for hereditary cancer risk had an atypical genetic finding, highlighting the importance of employing highly accurate and comprehensive methods in clinical genetic testing.

Molecular characterization of exonic rearrangements and frame shifts in the dystrophin gene in Duchenne muscular dystrophy patients in a Saudi community.

BACKGROUND: In individuals with Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD), exon skipping treatment to restore a wild-type phenotype or correct the frame shift of the mRNA transcript of the dystrophin (DMD) gene are mutation-specific. To explore the molecular characterization of DMD rearrangements and predict the reading frame, we simultaneously screened all 79 DMD gene exons of 45 unrelated male DMD patients using a multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) assay for deletion/duplication patterns. Multiplex PCR was used to confirm single deletions detected by the MLPA. RESULTS: There was an obvious diagnostic delay, with an extremely statistically significant difference between the age at initial symptoms and the age of clinical evaluation of DMD cases (t value, 10.3; 95% confidence interval 5.95-8.80, P < 0.0001); the mean difference between the two groups was 7.4 years. Overall, we identified 147 intragenic rearrangements: 46.3% deletions and 53.7% duplications. Most of the deletions (92.5%) were between exons 44 and 56, with exon 50 being the most frequently involved (19.1%). Eight new rearrangements, including a mixed deletion/duplication and double duplications, were linked to seven cases with DMD. Of all the cases, 17.8% had duplications with no hot spots. In addition, confirmation of the reading frame hypothesis helped account for new DMD rearrangements in this study. We found that 81% of our Saudi patients would potentially benefit from exon skipping, of which 42.9% had a mutation amenable to skipping of exon 51. CONCLUSIONS: Our study could generate considerable data on mutational rearrangements that may promote future experimental therapies in Saudi Arabia.