Lentigo Maligna and Lentigo Maligna Melanoma of the External Ear: Clinical and Dermoscopic Features of 19 Patients.

External ear lentigo maligna/lentigo melanoma (LM/LMM) represents approximately 1%-4% of all primary cutaneous melanomas. Over the past 20 years, dermoscopy has proven highly effective in early detection of LM/LMM, with recent studies identifying perifollicular linear projections (PLP) as a specific diagnostic criterion for early LM. However, in clinical practice, LM and LMM turn out to be very difficult to distinguish based on dermoscopic findings. Therefore, our retrospective monocentric study aimed to investigate dermoscopic characteristics, as well as the epidemiological and clinical data of 19 patients diagnosed with the external ear (EE) LM/LMM at the Oncologic Dermatology Unit in Bologna. Dermoscopic images were obtained using the FotoFinder Medicam 800HD, and specific criteria validated by the International Dermoscopy Society (IDS) for atypical pigmented facial lesions were assessed. Fisher's exact test was primarily used for statistical comparisons. As results, most of the patients were male (74%) with an average age (± SD) at diagnosis of 69.8 (± 15.1) years old. LMM appeared more commonly observed in elderly patients as compared to LM (mean 71.6 vs. 66.7, p = 0.514), presenting as pigmented macule (89.5%) of the ear lobule (23.9%). A statistically significant difference (p = 0.01) of tumour' diameter between LMM and LM was reported with the first resulting more than twice the size of the latter. Concerning dermoscopic findings, asymmetric pigmented follicles, obliteration of the follicular openings and grey circles were more frequently observed in LMM compared to LM (63.2% vs. 31.6%; 63.2% vs. 26.3%; 47.4% vs. 15.8%, respectively).

Lentigo Maligna Part II: Management.

Lentigo Maligna (LM) arises on chronically-sun damaged skin and can have extensive subclinical spread, often in functionally and cosmetically challenging areas. This two-part continuing medical education (CME) series reviews LM. Part I reviews epidemiology, risk factors, clinical presentation, diagnostic tools, biopsy technique, and histopathology of LM. Part II reviews both surgical and non-surgical treatment options. Surgical approaches - including conventional excision, Mohs micrographic surgery, and staged excision - remain first-line therapy to achieve cure. Some patients may be poor surgical candidates or elect for alternative treatments. Non-surgical modalities, such as topical and radiation therapy, are also reviewed. Finally, surveillance recommendations are discussed.

Lentigo Maligna Part I: Epidemiology, Risk Factors, and Diagnosis.

Lentigo maligna (LM) is an increasingly common subtype of melanoma, presenting as a slow-growing tan-brown macule or patch with irregular borders arising on chronically solar-damaged skin. This two-part continuing medical education (CME) series provides an overview of LM. Part I reviews LM's epidemiology, risk factors, and clinical presentation. Clinical tools to aid in diagnosis - such as dermoscopy and reflectance confocal microscopy - are discussed, as well as optimal biopsy strategies. Histopathology and current understanding of molecular underpinnings are also reviewed. Management of LM presents unique challenges given a predilection for subclinical spread on functionally and cosmetically sensitive areas such as the face. Part II reviews the two pillars of management including both surgical and non-surgical treatment options and surveillance.

Wood's Light in Inflammatory And Autoimmune Dermatoses, Infections and Skin Cancer. / Luz de Wood en dermatosis inflamatorias, autoinmunes, infecciones y cáncer cutáneo.

Wood's light (WL) is a useful, economical and easy-to-learn diagnostic tool. Despite its advantages, the use of LW among dermatologists is limited. In porokeratosis, the "diamond necklace" sign has been described, corresponding to the white fluorescence of the hyperkeratotic scale. Subclinical morphea lesions are seen as well-defined dark macules. Among the pigmentary disorders, the bluish fluorescence of vitiligo, the increased contrast of epidermal melasma, and the follicular-centered red fluorescence of progressive macular hypomelanosis stand out. Regarding skin infections, erythrasma presents a coral red fluorescence; tinea versicolor, yellow-green fluorescence; Pseudomonas aeuriginosa, green fluorescence; and scabies, blue-white fluorescence in the acarine grooves. In skin cancer, LW has been used to delimit the surgical margins of both lentigo maligna and non-melanoma skin cancer, with variable results.

Utilizing deep learning model for assessing melanocytic density in resection margins of lentigo maligna.

BACKGROUND: Surgical excision with clear histopathological margins is the preferred treatment to prevent progression of lentigo maligna (LM) to invasive melanoma. However, the assessment of resection margins on sun-damaged skin is challenging. We developed a deep learning model for detection of melanocytes in resection margins of LM. METHODS: In total, 353 whole slide images (WSIs) were included. 295 WSIs were used for training and 58 for validation and testing. The algorithm was trained with 3,973 manual pixel-wise annotations. The AI analyses were compared to those of three blinded dermatopathologists and two pathology residents, who performed their evaluations without AI and AI-assisted. Immunohistochemistry (SOX10) served as the reference standard. We used a dichotomized cutoff for low and high risk of recurrence (≤ 25 melanocytes in an area of 0.5 mm for low risk and > 25 for high risk). RESULTS: The AI model achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.84 in discriminating margins with low and high recurrence risk. In comparison, the AUC for dermatopathologists ranged from 0.72 to 0.90 and for the residents in pathology, 0.68 to 0.80. Additionally, with aid of the AI model the performance of two pathologists significantly improved. CONCLUSIONS: The deep learning showed notable accuracy in detecting resection margins of LM with a high versus low risk of recurrence. Furthermore, the use of AI improved the performance of 2/5 pathologists. This automated tool could aid pathologists in the assessment or pre-screening of LM margins.

Frequency of BRAF Mutations in Dysplastic Nevi, Lentigo Maligna, and Melanoma In Situ.

Background: In melanomas, mutations in the BRAF gene are common and their occurrence represents an early oncogenic event. Our goal was to determine and compare the frequency of BRAF gene mutations in dysplastic nevi (ND) and melanomas in situ (MIS), as well as whether there is a correlation between the presence of BRAF gene mutations and various anamnestic, clinical, and histopathologic variables. Methods: A total of 175 patients-106 with ND, 41 with MIS, and 28 with lentigo maligna (LM) were included in the study. DNA was extracted from tissue samples and analyzed using the competitive allele-specific TaqMan chain reaction by polymerase in real time to detect the presence of BRAF V600E and V600K mutations. The data were compared with anamnestic, clinical, and histopathological data. Results: There is a statistically significant correlation between the presence of BRAF mutation and the diagnosis of melanoma in situ (χ2 test, χ2 = 29.17, p < 0.0001). Patients with LM had a significantly lower incidence of BRAF mutations compared to patients with ND and MIS. There was a significant correlation between the presence of a BRAF mutation and tumor localization, as well as the age of the patient, but no statistically significant correlation between the presence of a BRAF mutation and sex, tumor size, or previous melanoma diagnosis. Conclusions: BRAF mutations in ND are essentially required; however, they are an insufficient oncogenic trigger for the development of melanoma. This research contributes to a better understanding of the etiopathogenesis of melanoma and the role of ND as possible precursor lesions.

Extrafacial lentigo maligna: A progression model and enhanced diagnostic techniques using dermatoscopy and reflectance confocal microscopy.

Lentigo maligna (LM) is a subtype of lentiginous melanoma confined to the epidermis, which is associated with chronic sun exposure. Its clinical, dermatoscopic, and histopathological diagnosis can be challenging, particularly in the early and advanced stages, requiring appropriate clinicopathological correlation. This article reviews the clinical presentation, diagnosis through noninvasive methods (dermoscopy and confocal microscopy), and provides insights for diagnosis of extrafacial LM through the presentation of four representative clinical cases from different phases of a theoretical-practical progression model. Recognizing these lesions is crucial, as once they invade the dermis, they can behave like any other type of melanoma.

Lentigo Maligna Treatment-An Update.

Lentigo maligna (LM) is a melanoma in situ that is prevalent in chronically sun-damaged skin. Characterized by a slow growth pattern and high mutation rates due to chronic UV exposure, LM poses diagnostic and therapeutic challenges, particularly given its tendency to mimic other skin lesions and its occurrence in cosmetically sensitive areas. Its diagnosis is based on an integrated approach using dermoscopy and reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM). Despite its slow progression, LM can evolve into lentigo maligna melanoma (LMM), making its treatment necessary. Treatment modalities encompass both surgical and non-surgical methods. Surgical treatments like Wide Local Excision (WLE) and Mohs Micrographic Surgery (MMS) aim for clear histological margins. WLE, a standard melanoma surgery, faces challenges from LM's subclinical extensions, which increase the recurrence risk. MMS, effective for large or poorly defined lesions, is defined by precise margin control while considering cosmetic outcomes. Non-surgical options, including radiotherapy and imiquimod, are alternatives for non-surgical candidates. Radiotherapy has been effective since the 1950s, offering good control and cosmetic results, especially for older patients. Imiquimod, an immunomodulator, shows promise in treating LM, though its application remains off-label. The increasing incidence of LM/LMM necessitates a balance in treatment choices to minimize recurrence and maintain cosmetic integrity. A multidisciplinary approach, integrating clinical examination with dermoscopy and RCM and histological assessment, is essential for accurate diagnosis and effective LM management.

Risk factors associated with tumor upstaging in melanomas treated with Mohs micrographic surgery with melanocytic immunohistochemistry.

Background: Mohs micrographic surgery with melanocytic immunohistochemistry (MMS-I) is increasingly utilized for special site melanoma treatment. Yet, frequency and risk factors associated with upstaging of all-stage cutaneous melanomas treated with MMS-I remain undefined. Objective: Determine upstaging frequency and factors associated with tumor upstaging for all-stage melanomas treated with MMS-I. Methods: In this retrospective, single-center case series, all cases of invasive and in situ melanoma treated with MMS-I between 2008 and 2018 were reviewed. Patient and tumor characteristics were recorded and compared between tumors that were and were not upstaged from their initial T stage. Results: Of the 962 melanoma MMS-I cases identified, 44 (4.6%) were upstaged, including 5.6% of in situ and 2.5% of invasive tumors. Risk factors for upstaging included lack of excisional intent at the time of initial biopsy (P < .01), nonlentigo maligna subtype (P = .03), female sex (P = .02), and initial in situ diagnosis (P = .03). Nonstatistically significant characteristics evaluated included patient age (P = .97), initial Breslow depth (P = .18), and biopsy type (P = .24). Limitations: Retrospective study design. Conclusions: All-stage cutaneous melanomas treated with MMS-I are associated with low upstaging rates. Tumor upstaging is associated with lack of excisional intent, female sex, and in situ tumors.

Double Immunohistochemical Labelling of PRAME and Melan A in Slow Mohs Biopsy Margin Assessment of Lentigo Maligna and Lentigo Maligna Melanoma.

Introduction: Lentigo maligna (LM) and lentigo maligna melanoma (LMM) predominantly affect the head and neck areas in elderly patients, presenting as challenging ill-defined pigmented lesions with indistinct borders. Surgical margin determination for complete removal remains intricate due to these characteristics. Morphological examination of surgical margins is the key form of determining successful treatment in LM/LMM and underpin the greater margin control provided through the Slow Mohs micrographic surgery (SMMS) approach. Recent assessments have explored the use of immunohistochemistry (IHC) markers, such as Preferentially Expressed Antigen in Melanoma (PRAME), to aid in LM/LMM and margin evaluation, leveraging the selectivity of PRAME labelling in malignant melanocytic neoplasms. Methods: A Novel double-labelling (DL) method incorporating both PRAME and MelanA IHC was employed to further maximise the clinical applicability of PRAME in the assessment of LM/LMM in SMMS biopsies. The evaluation involved 51 samples, comparing the results of the novel DL with respective single-labelling (SL) IHC slides. Results: The findings demonstrated a significant agreement of 96.1% between the DL method and SL slides across the tested samples. The benchmark PRAME SL exhibited a sensitivity of 91.3% in the SMMS specimens and 67.9% in histologically confirmed positive margins. Discussion: This study highlights the utility of PRAME IHC and by extension PRAME DL as an adjunctive tool in the assessment of melanocytic tumours within staged excision margins in SMMS samples.

Real-life practice of reflectance confocal microscopy in France: A prospective multicenter study.

BACKGROUND: Studies demonstrating the potential utility of reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM) have been performed under experimental conditions. OBJECTIVE: To provide an overview of RCM practice in real-life. METHODS: A multicenter, prospective study carried out in 10 university dermatology departments in France. RESULTS: Overall, 410 patients were enrolled. One-half of the patients (48%) were referred by private practice dermatologists. They were referred for diagnosis (84.9%) or presurgical mapping (13%). For diagnosis, the lesions were located on the face (62%), arms and legs (14.9%), and trunk (13.6%), and presurgical mapping was almost exclusively on the face (90.9%). Among those referred for diagnosis, the main indication was suspicion of a skin tumor (92.8%). Of these, 50.6% were spared biopsies after RCM. When RCM indicated surgery, histology revealed malignant lesions in 72.7% of cases. The correlation between RCM and histopathology was high, with a correlation rate of 82.76% and a kappa coefficient of 0.73 (0.63; 0.82). LIMITATIONS: This study was performed in the settings of French tertiary referral hospitals. CONCLUSION: This study shows that in real-life RCM can be integrated into the workflow of a public private network, which enables a less invasive diagnostic procedure for patients.

Risk factors of lentigo maligna as compared to other melanoma subtypes.

BACKGROUND: Lentigo maligna (LM) exhibits a particular epidemiological profile compared to other histopathologic subtypes of melanoma, with a propensity for the head and neck area and a higher mean age at diagnosis. Few small-scale studies have exclusively evaluated the risk factors for the development of LM. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to compare LM to other histological subtypes of melanoma for the prevalence of known melanoma risk factors, including pigmentary characteristics, history of occupational sun exposure, nevus count, and familial melanoma history. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a case-control study of 152 patients with LM and 784 patients with other melanoma subtypes (OM). The Mann-Whitney t-test and Pearson chi-squared test were used to detect differences between the two groups in continuous and categorical variables, respectively. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression models were then constructed to identify risk factors for developing LM compared to other melanoma subtypes. RESULTS: In multivariate logistic regression analysis, LM was positively associated with a lentigines count >50 and occupational sun exposure compared to OM (OR 2.10, 95% CI 1.35-3.29 and OR 2.18, 95% CI 1.33-3.57, respectively). In contrast, patients with an increased nevus count and fair or medium skin color were less likely to develop LM than OM (OR 0.93, P < 0.001, 95% CI 0.91-0.94, and OR 0.28, P < 0.001, 95% CI 0.17-0.46, respectively). In univariate analysis, LM exhibited a weaker association with all pigmentary traits than OM. No significant associations were found for atypical nevi count and family history. CONCLUSION: We found significant differences in the prevalence of known melanoma risk factors between LM and other melanoma subtypes, which supports the hypothesis of a distinct pathogenetic pathway of LM.

The combination of dermoscopy and reflectance confocal microscopy increases the diagnostic confidence of amelanotic/hypomelanotic lentigo maligna.

The dermoscopic diagnosis of amelanotic/hypomelanotic lentigo maligna/lentigo maligna melanoma (AHLM/LMM) may be very difficult in its early stages because of lack of pigment. Reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM) is an imaging technique that is especially helpful for the diagnosis of lentigo maligna. To determine the diagnostic performances of dermoscopy and RCM in the diagnosis of AHLM/LMMs we evaluated dermoscopic and RCM images of consecutive cases of histopathologically confirmed AHLM/LMMs, amelanotic/hypomelanotic basal cell carcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma (AHBCCs/AHSCCs), amelanotic/hypomelanotic benign lesions (AHBLs), and actinic keratoses (AKs) from five participating centers. Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, predictive values, and level of diagnosis confidence were calculated for both diagnostic procedures. Both dermoscopy and RCM showed diagnostic performance >97% in the diagnosis of AHLM/LMMs versus AHBCC/AHSCCs and their combination slightly improved diagnostic performance, with accuracy increasing from 98.0% to 99.1%. Similarly, RCM in combination with dermoscopy showed a tiny increase in the diagnostic performance in the diagnosis of AHLM/LMMs versus AHBLs (accuracy increased from 87.2% to 88.8%) and versus AKs (accuracy increased from 91.4% to 93.4%). Although the increase in diagnostic performance due to RCM was modest, the combination of dermoscopy and RCM greatly increased the level of confidence; high confidence in the diagnosis of AHLM/LMMs versus AHBLs increased from 36.2% with dermoscopy alone to 76.6% with dermoscopy plus RMC. Based on our results, dermoscopy and RCM should be complementary to improve not only diagnostic accuracy but also the level of diagnostic certainty in the diagnosis of AHLM/LMMs.

Excision margins for melanoma in situ on the head and neck-A single-center 10-year retrospective review of treatment with Mohs micrographic surgery.

BACKGROUND: Although current guidelines recommend a 5 mm surgical margin for the excision of melanoma in situ (MIS), increasing evidence has shown this may be suboptimal to achieve tumor clearance. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate margins required for optimal cure rates with excision of MIS on the head and neck and investigate tumor and/or patient factors in those requiring >5 mm margins to achieve tumor clearance. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed on 846 (807 primary and 39 recurrent) MIS cases on the head and neck treated in the authors' dermatologic surgery department over a 126-month (10.5 year) period. RESULTS: Sixty-two percent were cleared with 5 mm margins. A total of 15 mm margins were required to achieve a 97% clearance rate. Difference in clearance rate between margin thresholds was significant (P < .001). Tumor location on the cheek and larger preoperative size correlated with requiring >5 mm margins to achieve tumor clearance (P = .006 and P = .001, respectively). LIMITATIONS: This is a single-center retrospective study which relies on accurate documentation of clinical data. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that MIS on the head and neck often requires margins >5 mm margins to achieve tumor clearance. When Mohs micrographic surgery is not possible, excision margins of ≥10 mm are likely necessary for head and neck tumors.

Dermoscopy of Lentiginous Melanomas and Equivocal Benign Pigmented Macules of the Scalp: A Case-Control Multicentric Study.

INTRODUCTION: Although the dermoscopic features of facial lentiginous melanomas (LM), including lentigo maligna and lentigo maligna melanoma, have been extensively studied, the literature about those located on the scalp is scarce. This study aims to describe the dermoscopic features of scalp LM and assess the diagnostic accuracy of dermoscopy to discriminate them from equivocal benign pigmented macules. METHODS: Consecutive cases of scalp LM and histopathology-proven benign but clinically equivocal pigmented macules (actinic keratoses, solar lentigos, seborrhoeic keratoses, and lichen planus-like keratoses) from four referral centres were included. Dermoscopic features were analysed by two blinded experts. The diagnostic performance of a predictive model was assessed. RESULTS: 56 LM and 44 controls were included. Multiple features previously described for facial and extrafacial LM were frequently identified in both groups. Expert's sensitivity to diagnose scalp LM was 76.8% (63.6-87.0) and 78.6% (65.6-88.4), with specificity of 54.5% (38.9-69.6) and 56.8% (41.0-71.7), and fair agreement (kappa coefficient 0.248). The strongest independent predictors of malignancy were (OR, 95% CI) chaos of colour (15.43, 1.48-160.3), pigmented reticular lines (14.96, 1.68-132.9), increased density of vascular network (3.45, 1.09-10.92), and perifollicular grey circles (2.89, 0.96-8.67). The predictive model achieved 85.7% (73.8-93.6) sensitivity, 61.4% (45.5-75.6) specificity, and 81.5 (73.0-90.0) area under curve to discriminate benign and malignant lesions. A diagnostic flowchart was proposed, which should improve the diagnostic performance of dermoscopy. CONCLUSION: Both facial and extrafacial dermoscopic patterns can be identified in scalp LM, with considerable overlap with benign pigmented macules, leading to low specificity and interobserver agreement on dermoscopy.