Benefit of consolidative radiation in patients with extranodal limited-stage diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: a multicenter retrospective study in China.

Approximately 40% of limited-stage (stage I and II) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (LS-DLBCL) presents with extranodal disease. Extranodal LS-DLBCL may have significant biological differences and associated with worse outcomes than nodal disease. Although rituximab based chemoimmunotherapy is standard of first-line treatment, the role of consolidative radiotherapy (RT) in this particular subgroup is controversial. In this multicenter retrospective study, we evaluated the survival benefit of consolidative RT in patients diagnosed with extranodal LS-DLBCL and received rituximab-based chemoimmunotherapy with or without consolidative RT. A total of 328 patients were included, 129 patients (39.3%) received chemoimmunotherapy and consolidative RT, and 199 patients (60.7%) received chemoimmunotherapy alone. With a median follow-up of 5.1 years (range, 0.3-14.8 years), 5-year progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) for all patients were 75.4% and 83.9%, respectively. In multivariate analyses, the addition of consolidative RT was associated with superior OS (P = 0.004) and PFS (P = 0.005). High stage-modified International Prognosis Index (SM-IPI) risk predicted worse OS (P = 0.001) and PFS (P = 0.005). Also, propensity score-matched analyses showed RT improved both OS (hazard ratio [HR] 0.228, 95% confidence index [CI] 0.111-0.467, P < 0.001) and PFS (HR 0.308, 95% CI 0.167-0.566, P < 0.001). Among patients who achieved CR, 49 patients (16.6%) developed disease relapse, of which 30.6% relapsed at local sites. Consolidative RT significantly reduced relapse risk (P = 0.002). Our results demonstrated that consolidative RT significantly improved outcomes in patients with extranodal LS-DLBCL in the rituximab era.

The Dose/Fractionation Debate in Limited-Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer.

To explore the most suitable dosage regimen for limited-stage small cell lung cancer (LS-SCLC) and provide references for clinical selection, strict inclusion criteria were applied, and studies were screened from Pubmed, Embase, and Web of Science. Subsequently, data on two-year overall survival rates and dosage regimens were collected, and scatter plots were constructed to provide a comprehensive perspective. The survival benefits of various dosage regimens were evaluated, and a linear quadratic equation was utilized to fit the relationship between the biologically effective dose (BED10) and the two-year overall survival rate. Among the five randomized controlled trials, the two-year overall survival rate of ConvTRT regimens with BED10 > 60 Gy (rough value) was only at or below the median of all ConvTRT regimens or all included study regimens, indicating that increasing the number and total dose of ConvTRT does not necessarily lead to better prognosis. In the exploration of HypoTRT regimens, there was a linear positive correlation between BED10 and the two-year overall survival rate (p < 0.0001), while the exploration of HyperTRT regimens was relatively limited, with the majority focused on the 45 Gy/30 F regimen. However, the current 45 Gy/30 F regimen is not sufficient to control LS-SCLC, resulting in a high local recurrence rate. High-dose ConvTRT regimens have long treatment durations and may induce tumor regrowth which may cause reduced efficacy. Under reasonable toxicity reactions, HyperTRT or HypoTRT with higher radiotherapy doses is recommended for treating LS-SCLC.

Establishment of a prognostic nomogram for elderly patients with limited-stage small cell lung cancer receiving radiotherapy.

The present study explored the risk factors associated with radiotherapy in seniors diagnosed with limited-stage small cell lung cancer (LS-SCLC) to construct and validate a prognostic nomogram. The study retrospectively included 137 elderly patients with LS-SCLC who previously received radiotherapy. Univariate and multivariate COX analyses were conducted to identify independent risk factors and determine optimal cut-off values. Kaplan-Meier survival curves and nomograms were constructed to predict survival. Calibration and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to evaluate the accuracy and consistency of the nomogram. Illness rating scale-geriatric (CIRS-G) score, treatment strategy, lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR), white blood cell-to-monocyte ratio (WMR), and prognostic nutritional index (PNI) were discovered to be independent prognostic factors. Based on the findings of our multivariate analysis, a risk nomogram was developed to assess patient prognosis. Internal bootstrap resampling was utilized to validate the model, and while the accuracy of the AUC curve at 1 year was modest at 0.657 (95% CI 0.458-0.856), good results were achieved in predicting 3- and 5 year survival with AUCs of 0.757 (95% CI 0.670-0.843) and 0.768 (95% CI 0.643-0.893), respectively. Calibration curves for 1-, 3-, and 5 year overall survival probabilities demonstrated good cocsistency between expected and actual outcomes. Patients with concurrent chemoradiotherapy, CIRS-G score > 5 points and low PNI, WMR and LMR correlated with poor prognosis. The nomogram model developed based on these factors demonstrated good predictive performance and provides a simple, accessible, and practical tool for clinicians to guide clinical decision-making and study design.

Six versus four or five cycles of first-line etoposide and platinum-based chemotherapy combined with thoracic radiotherapy in patients with limited-stage small-cell lung cancer: A propensity score-matched analysis of a prospective randomized trial.

OBJECTIVES: The recommended treatment for limited-stage small-cell lung cancer (LS-SCLC) is a combination of thoracic radiotherapy (TRT) and etoposide plus cisplatin (EP) chemotherapy, typically administered over 4-6 cycles. Nonetheless, the optimal duration of chemotherapy is still not determined. This study aimed to compare the outcomes of patients with LS-SCLC who received either 6 cycles or 4-5 cycles of EP chemotherapy combined with TRT. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this retrospective analysis, we utilized data from our prior prospective trial to analyze the outcomes of 265 LS-SCLC patients who received 4-6 courses of EP combined with concurrent accelerated hyperfractionated TRT between 2002 and 2017. Patients were categorized into two groups depending on their number of chemotherapy cycles: 6 or 4-5 cycles. To assess overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), we employed the Kaplan-Meier method after conducting propensity score matching (PSM). RESULTS: Among the 265 LS-SCLC patients, 60 (22.6%) received 6 cycles of EP chemotherapy, while 205 (77.4%) underwent 4-5 cycles. Following PSM (53 patients for each group), the patients in the 6 cycles group exhibited a significant improvement in OS and PFS in comparison to those in the 4-5 cycles group [median OS: 29.8 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 23.6-53.1 months) vs. 22.7 months (95% CI, 20.8-29.1 months), respectively, p = 0.019; median PFS: 17.9 months (95% CI, 13.7-30.5 months) vs. 12.0 months (95% CI, 9.8-14.2 months), respectively, p = 0.006]. The two-year and five-year OS rates were 60.38% and 29.87% in the 6 cycles group, whereas 47.17% and 15.72% in the 4-5 cycles group, respectively. CONCLUSION: Patients diagnosed with LS-SCLC who were treated with EP regimen chemotherapy combined with TRT exhibited notably enhanced survival when administered 6 cycles of chemotherapy, as compared to those who underwent only 4-5 cycles.

Rational and design of prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) and brain MRI surveillance versus brain MRI surveillance alone in patients with limited-stage small cell lung cancer achieving complete remission (CR) of tumor after chemoradiotherapy: a multicenter prospective randomized study.

BACKGROUND: Prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) is part of standard care in limited-stage small cell lung cancer (SCLC) at present. As evidence from retrospective studies increases, the benefits of PCI for limited-stage SCLC are being challenged. METHODS: A multicenter, prospective, randomized controlled study was designed. The key inclusion criteria were: histologically or cytologically confirmed small cell carcinoma, age ≥ 18 years, KPS ≥ 80, limited-stage is defined as tumor confined to one side of the chest including ipsilateral hilar, bilateral mediastinum and supraclavicular lymph nodes, patients have received definitive thoracic radiotherapy (regardless of the dose-fractionation of radiotherapy used) and chemotherapy, evaluated as complete remission (CR) of tumor 4-6 weeks after the completion of chemo-radiotherapy. Eligible patients will be randomly assigned to two arms: (1) PCI and brain MRI surveillance arm, receiving PCI (2.5 Gy qd to a total dose of 25 Gy in two weeks) followed by brain MRI surveillance once every three months for two years; (2) brain MRI surveillance alone arm, undergoing brain MRI surveillance once every three months for two years. The primary objective is to compare the 2-year brain metastasis-free survival (BMFS) rates between the two arms. Secondary objectives include 2-year overall survival (OS) rates, intra-cranial failure patterns, 2-year progression-free survival rates and neurotoxicity. In case of brain metastasis (BM) detect during follow-up, stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) will be recommended if patients meet the eligibility criteria. DISCUSSION: Based on our post-hoc analysis of a prospective study, we hypothesize that in limited-stage SCLC patients with CR after definitive chemoradiotherapy, and ruling out of BM by MRI, it would be feasible to use brain MRI surveillance and omit PCI in these patients. If BM is detected during follow-up, treatment with SRS or whole brain radiotherapy does not appear to have a detrimental effect on OS. Additionally, this approach may reduce potential neurotoxicity associated with PCI.

Efficacy and safety of first-line PD-L1/PD-1 inhibitors in limited-stage small cell lung cancer: a multicenter propensity score matched retrospective study.

Background: The prognosis of small cell lung cancer (SCLC) patients is poor, and the standard first-line treatment for limited-stage small cell lung cancer (LS-SCLC) is still chemotherapy and thoracic radiotherapy. The primary objectives of our study were to confirm the superior efficacy of first-line immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) plus etoposide and platinum (EP) for LS-SCLC and find crucial biomarkers. Methods: We analyzed LS-SCLC patients from three medical centers, employing propensity score matching for group comparability. Survival outcomes were estimated by Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses. Additionally, we conducted univariate and multivariate analyses to investigate potential predictive factors. Results: Among 150 patients in our study, we successfully matched 41 pairs. The median overall survival (OS) was 29.5 months in the EP + ICIs group and 20.0 months in the EP group {hazard ratio (HR) =0.64 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.41-1.02], P=0.059}. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was significantly extended in the EP + ICIs group (14.6 months), compared to the EP group (8.6 months) [HR =0.42 (95% CI: 0.28-0.63), P<0.001]. After matching, patients receiving chemo-immunotherapy had a median OS of 36.1 months, significantly surpassing those receiving chemotherapy alone (19.0 months) [HR =0.51 (95% CI: 0.28-0.93), P=0.02]. And the patients in the EP + ICIs group also had longer PFS after matching [HR =0.42 (95% CI: 0.25-0.71), P=0.001]. No significant difference in the objective response rate (ORR) and treatment-related adverse events (trAEs) between the two groups was found (ORR: EP: 81.0%, EP + ICIs: 90.0%, P=0.14; trAEs: EP: grade 1-2, 49.3%; grade 3-4, 42.5%; EP + ICIs: grade 1-2, 40.0%; grade 3-4, 49.1%, P=0.62). The multivariate analysis presented that the history of immunotherapy [EP + PD-1 inhibitors: HR =0.33 (95% CI: 0.17-0.62), P=0.001; EP + PD-L1 inhibitors: HR =0.18 (95% CI: 0.06-0.60), P=0.005] and baseline lung immune prognostic index (LIPI) [intermediate: HR =2.22 (95% CI: 1.20-4.13), P=0.01; poor: HR =2.03 (95% CI: 0.71-5.77), P=0.18] were independent prognostic factors for PFS among all LS-SCLC cases. However, no independent prognostic factor was identified for OS. Conclusions: Our real-world data showed promising clinical efficacy and tolerable safety of first-line programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) inhibitors or programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors in cases with LS-SCLC. Additionally, LIPI may serve as a valuable prognostic factor.

Conditional Survival of Patients with Limited-Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer After Surgery: A National Real-World Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: The prognosis of limited-stage small cell lung cancer (LS-SCLC) after surgery usually is estimated at diagnosis, but how the prognosis actually evolves over time for patients who survived for a predefined time is unknown. METHODS: Data on patients with a diagnosis of LS-SCLC after surgery between 2004 and 2015 were retrieved from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. The 5-year conditional cancer-specific survival (CCSS) and conditional overall survival (COS) were calculated. RESULTS: This study analyzed 997 patients (555 women, 55.7%) with a median age, of 67 years (interquartile range [IQR], 60-73 years). The 5-year CCSS and COS increased from 44.7% and 38.3%, respectively, at diagnosis to 83.7% and 67.9% at 5 years after diagnosis. Although there were large differences with different stages (stages I, II, and III) at diagnosis (respectively 59.5%, 28.4%; 28.1% for CCSS and 50.6%, 24.8%, and 23.6% for COS), the gap decreased with time, and the rates were similar after 5 years (respectively 85.0%, 80.3%, and 79.4% for CCSS; 65.6%, 56.9%, and 61.3% for COS). The 5-year conditional survival for the patients who received lobectomy was better than for those who received sublobectomy or pneumonectomy. Multivariable analyses showed that only age and resection type were independent predictors for CCSS and COS, respectively, throughout the period. CONCLUSION: Conditional survival estimates for LS-SCLC generally increased over time, with the most significant improvement in patients with advanced stage of disease. Resection type and old age represented extremely important determinants of prognosis after a lengthy event-free follow-up period.

Application of postoperative adjuvant radiotherapy in limited-stage small cell lung cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: One of the most important treatments for small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is radiation therapy. Currently, the criteria for administering postoperative adjuvant radiotherapy (PORT) in SCLC remain uncertain. Therefore, we conducted a meta-analysis to investigate the influence of PORT on the prognosis of limited-stage SCLC (LS-SCLC). METHODS: We conducted a comprehensive search across three databases, PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library. Data analysis involved utilizing both random-effects and fixed-effects models for pooling the results. A comparative analysis was performed to assess the prognostic outcomes of patients with LS-SCLC who did and did not undergo PORT. The primary outcome assessed was overall survival (OS), while the secondary outcome was disease-free survival (DFS). RESULTS: This analysis included 11 retrospective studies comprising 7694 eligible participants. Among the entire population of LS-SCLC patients, the OS was superior in those receiving PORT than in those not receiving it (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.79, 95 % confidence interval [CI]: 0.71-0.87; P < 0.0001). In pN0 stage LS-SCLC patients, PORT was associated with a detrimental effect on OS (HR: 1.22, 95 % CI: 1.04-1.43; P = 0.01). In pN1 stage LS-SCLC patients, additionally administering PORT did not provide a significant OS advantage as compared to not administering it (HR: 0.82, 95 % CI: 0.60-1.12; P = 0.21). In pN2 stage LS-SCLC patients, those receiving PORT demonstrated a significant improvement in OS (HR: 0.59; 95 % CI: 0.50-0.70; P < 0.0001) as compared to those not receiving it. Regarding DFS in LS-SCLC patients, the difference in the protective effect with and without the administration of PORT was less pronounced (HR: 0.76, 95 % CI: 0.58-1.00; P = 0.053). CONCLUSIONS: With respect to OS, PORT is not advisable in patients with pN0 or pN1 stage LS-SCLC but is highly recommended in pN2 stage LS-SCLC. Further research is warranted to confirm these findings.

Construction of brain metastasis prediction model in limited stage small cell lung cancer patients without prophylactic cranial irradiation.

INTRODUCTION: Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is a highly aggressive lung cancer variant known for its elevated risk of brain metastases (BM). While earlier meta-analyses supported the use of prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) to reduce BM incidence and enhance overall survival, modern MRI capabilities raise questions about PCI's universal benefit for limited-stage SCLC (LS-SCLC) patients. As a response, we have created a predictive model for BM, aiming to identify low-risk individuals who may not require PCI. METHODS: A total of 194 LS-SCLC patients without PCI treated between 2009 and 2021 were included. We conducted both univariate and multivariate analyses to pinpoint the factors associated with the development of BM. A nomogram for predicting the 2- and 3-year probabilities of BM was then constructed. RESULTS: Univariate and multivariate analyses revealed several significant independent risk factors for the development of BM. These factors include TNM stage, the number of chemotherapy (ChT) cycles, Ki-67 expression level, pretreatment serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels, and haemoglobin (HGB) levels. These findings underscore their respective roles as independent predictors of BM. Based on the results of the final multivariable analysis, a nomogram model was created. In the training cohort, the nomogram yielded an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.870 at 2 years and 0.828 at 3 years. In the validation cohort, the AUC values were 0.897 at 2 years and 0.789 at 3 years. The calibration curve demonstrated good agreement between the predicted and observed probabilities of BM. CONCLUSIONS: A novel nomogram has been developed to forecast the likelihood of BM in patients diagnosed with LS-SCLC. This tool holds the potential to assist healthcare professionals in formulating more informed and tailored treatment plans.

Real-world predictors of survival in patients with limited-stage small-cell lung cancer in Manitoba, Canada.

Background: Although therapy for limited-stage small-cell lung cancer (LS-SCLC) is administered with curative intent, most patients relapse and eventually die of recurrent disease. Chemotherapy (CT) with concurrent radiotherapy (RT) remains the standard of care for LS-SCLC; however, this could evolve in the near future. Therefore, understanding the current prognostic factors associated with survival is essential. Objective: This real-world analysis examines factors associated with long-term survival in patients with LS-SCLC treated with CT in Manitoba, Canada. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted using Manitoba Cancer Registry and CancerCare Manitoba records. Eligible patients were aged >18 years and had cytologically confirmed LS-SCLC diagnosed between January 1, 2004, and December 31, 2018, for which they received CT ± RT. Baseline patient, disease, and treatment characteristics and survival duration, characterized as short (<6 months), medium (6-24 months), and long term (>24 months), were extracted. Overall survival (OS) was estimated at one, two, and five years and assessed using Kaplan-Meier methods and Cox proportional hazards models. Results: Over the 15-year study period, 304 patients met the eligibility criteria. Long-term survivors comprised 39.1% of the cohort; at diagnosis, this subgroup was younger, more likely to have Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) 0, and have normal lactate dehydrogenase, sodium, and hemoglobin levels. OS estimates for the entire cohort at one, two, and five years were 66%, 38%, and 18%, respectively. In the ECOG PS 0 subgroup, OS estimates at one, two, and five years were 85%, 52%, and 24%, respectively; OS estimates were 60%, 35%, and 17%, respectively, for ECOG PS 1-2 and were 47%, 23%, and 10%, respectively, for ECOG PS 3-4. OS was significantly higher among patients with normal serum sodium and hemoglobin levels than those with abnormal levels. Univariable hazard regression models found that ECOG PS, age at diagnosis, receipt of prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI), and thoracic RT were associated with survival. On multivariable hazard regression, ECOG PS and receipt of PCI were associated with survival. Conclusion: Survival for greater than two years in patients with LS-SCLC treated with CT ± RT was associated with ECOG PS and receipt of PCI.

Volumetric-Modulated Arc-Based Re-radiosurgery With Simultaneous Reduced-Dose Whole-Brain Irradiation for Local Failures Following Prior Radiosurgery of Brain Oligometastases From Small Cell Lung Cancer.

First-line and possibly repeated stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) with preserving whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) is an attractive and promising option for synchronous or metachronous limited brain metastases (BMs) from small cell lung cancer (SCLC), for which a modest prescription dose is generally preferred, such as a biological effective dose of ≤60 Gy, based on the linear-quadratic formula with an alpha/beta ratio of 10 (BED10). In addition, the optimal planning scheme for re-SRS for local progression after SRS of BMs from SCLC remains unclear. Herein, we describe a case of limited BMs developing after a partial response to standard chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for limited-stage SCLC. The BMs, including local failures following prior single-fraction (fr) SRS, were re-treated with volumetric-modulated arc-based SRS combined with simultaneous reduced-dose WBRT. The first SRS with 36.3 Gy/3 fr (BED10 80 Gy) for a small BM resulted in a local control of 17.2 months. However, the second SRS with 20 Gy/1 fr (BED10 60 Gy) to the 60% or 85% isodose surface (IDS) covering the gross tumor volume (GTV) of three new BMs with a paradoxical T1/T2 mismatch, that is, a visible mass on T2 larger than an enhancing area, resulted in partial symptomatic local progression of all lesions within 5.2 months, along with the development of two new lesions, despite continued amrubicin monotherapy. In contrast, the third SRS with 53 Gy/10 fr (BED10 81 Gy) to ≤74% IDSs encompassing the GTV boundary resulted in complete responses of all the lesions during six months. However, despite a combined use of WBRT of 25 Gy in the third SRS, symptomatic spinal cerebrospinal fluid dissemination and new BMs developed, the former leading to patient mortality. A BED10 of ≥80 Gy to the GTV margin and a steep dose increase inside the GTV boundary are suitable to ensure excellent local control in SRS for SCLC BMs. Re-SRS with the aforementioned scheme can be an efficacious option for local failures following prior SRS with a BED10 of ≤60 Gy. Modest dose escalation with a simultaneous integrated boost to bulky lesions in the initial CRT may reduce the development of new BM through improved control of the potential source.

[Impact of the depth of remission by induction chemotherapy on the prognosis of limited stage small cell lung cancer].

Objective: To evaluate the effect of depth of remission of induction chemotherapy on the overall prognosis of limited stage small cell lung cancer (L-SCLC). Methods: The study was a retrospective, L-SCLC patients who contained complete imaging data and underwent consecutive standardized treatments at the Department of Thoracic Radiation and Medical Oncology, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University between January 2013 and June 2021 were included. To delineate the volume of tumor before and after induction chemotherapy and to calculate the depth of remission caused by the induced chemotherapy. The time receiver operating characteristic (timeROC) method was used to determine the optimal predictors for prognosis, multi-factor analysis using Cox risk proportional model. Results: A total of 104 patients were included in this study. The median PFS and OS of this cohort were 13.7 months and 20.9 months, respectively. It was observed by timeROC analysis that residual tumor volume after induction chemotherapy had the optimal predictive value of PFS at 1 year (AUC=0.86, 95% CI: 0.78~0.94) and OS at 2 years (AUC=0.76, 95% CI: 0.65~0.87). Multivariate analysis showed residual tumor volume after induction chemotherapy was the independent prognostic factor to PFS (HR=1.006, 95% CI: 1.003~1.009, P<0.01) and OS (HR=1.009, 95% CI: 1.005~1.012, P<0.001). For those whose residual tumor volume remitted to less than 10 cm(3) after induction chemotherapy, the favorable long-term outcomes could be achieved, regardless of their initial tumor load. Conclusion: The depth of remission of induction chemotherapy could be a promising prognostic predictor to the L-SCLC and provide the individualized treatment guidance.

Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratios as prognostic biomarkers in limited-stage small-cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis.

Background: The role of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) as prognostic markers in limited-stage small-cell lung cancer (LS-SCLC) remains controversial. Methods: Using pooled hazard ratios (HR) with 95% CIs, we assessed the correlation of pre-treatment NLR and PLR with overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in LS-SCLC. Publication bias was assessed by Begg's and Egger's tests. Results: Ten studies were enrolled in our meta-analysis. Pooled analyses showed that pre-treatment high NLR was significantly associated with poor OS (HR: 1.80) and PFS (HR: 1.69) in LS-SCLC patients. High pre-treatment PLR was also associated with shorter OS (HR: 1.52) and PFS (HR: 1.39) in LS-SCLC patients. Conclusion: Our meta-analysis suggests that high pre-treatment NLR or PLR may be negatively related to OS and PFS in LS-SCLC.

No survival benefit with early incorporation of thoracic radiotherapy using daily fractionation in patients with limited-stage small cell lung cancer undergoing chemoradiotherapy in the modern era: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: When concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) is administered for limited-stage small cell lung cancer (LS-SCLC), the early incorporation of thoracic radiotherapy (TRT) is generally recommended. However, it is controversial if this approach is really beneficial with most commonly used daily fractionated TRT in the modern era. METHODS: A systematic literature search was performed using several databases following the PRISMA guidelines from Jan 2000 to Nov 2022. We excluded twice-daily TRT-based studies. The hazard ratio (HR) for survival following late TRT as a primary effect size was pooled from comparisons within individual studies according to the timing of daily fractionated TRT (early vs. late). RESULTS: A total of 10 studies including 10,164 analyzable patients met all inclusion criteria. 'Early' timing usually referred to TRT within 1-2 cycles of concurrent chemotherapy. The pooled results demonstrated that the risk of death was not significantly increased following late TRT compared with early TRT (HR 1.01, 95% CI 0.84-1.20, p = 0.94). All sensitivity analysis and planned subgroup analyses showed similar results. In comparison with early TRT, late TRT did not significantly increase the risk of progression (HR 0.94, 95% CI 0.80-1.11, p = 0.48). Furthermore, late TRT was beneficial in alleviating grade 3 or higher esophagitis (OR 0.42, p = 0.01), but no significant differences was found in pneumonitis (OR 0.62, p = 0.38), and neutropenia (OR 0.57, p = 0.11). No evidence of publication bias was found. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first meta-analysis to support the late incorporation of TRT in managing patients with LS-SCLC undergoing daily fractionated CCRT in the modern era. This approach may not compromise survival and can prevent severe acute toxicities. Further prospective studies of the daily fractionated TRT timing are warranted.

Prophylactic cranial irradiation-related lymphopenia affects survival in patients with limited-stage small cell lung cancer.

Background: The study aimed to identify the relations of the absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) nadir during prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) and patient outcomes in limited-stage small cell lung cancer (LS-SCLC). Methods: We analyzed 268 L S-SCLC patients who underwent PCI from 2012 to 2019. ALC values were collected prior, during, and 3 months post PCI. Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses were performed to assess the relation of ALC to patient prognosis. Two nomograms were developed on the basis of clinical variables for survival prediction. Results: Compared with the ALC before PCI (1.13 × 109 cells/L), the ALC nadir during PCI was significantly reduced by 0.68 × 109 cells/L (P < 0.001) and raised to 1.02 × 109 cells/L 3 months post PCI. Patients with a low ALC nadir during PCI (<0.68 × 109 cells/L) had inferior progression free survival (PFS) (median PFS: 17.2 m vs. 43.7 m, P = 0.019) and overall survival (OS) (median OS: 29.0 m vs 39.1 m, P = 0.012). Multivariate Cox analysis revealed that age, smoking history, clinical stage, and ALC nadir were independent OS (P = 0.006, P = 0.005, P < 0.001 and P = 0.027, respectively), as well as independent PFS predictors (P = 0.032, P = 0.012, P = 0.012 and P = 0.018, respectively). After internal cross-validation, the corrected concordance indices of the predictive nomograms for PFS and OS were 0.637 and 0.663, respectively. Conclusion: LS-SCLC patients with a low ALC nadir during PCI likely have worse survival outcomes. Dynamic evaluation of the ALC during PCI is recommended for LS-SCLC patients.

A study of the prognosis of patients with limited-stage small cell lung cancer who did or did not receive prophylactic cranial irradiation after effective chemoradiotherapy.

Objective: To investigate the prognosis of patients with LS-SCLC who responded to chest chemoradiotherapy but did not receive PCI. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on LS-SCLC patients who had achieved complete remission (CR) or partial remission (PR) after definitive chemoradiotherapy but did not receive PCI. The survival rates were calculated using Kaplan-Meier method. The prognosis was analyzed using Cox proportional hazard regression model. The main endpoint was OS. Results: Of the 500 patients with LS-SCLC admitted between June 2002 and January 2018, 327 achieved CR or PR after definitive chest chemoradiotherapy, 103 did not receive PCI, and 63 of them developed brain metastases (BM). The 1-year and 3-year OS rates in PCI group were 87.5% and 42.3% respectively, versus 70.4% and 20.9% for non-PCI group(P=0.002). The median survival time after BM was 8.7 months (range: 0.3-48.7), and 3-year OS rate was 15.0%, the median survival time of patients without BM was 20.1 months (range: 2.9-79.4), and 3-year OS was 33.4% (P=0.014). Patients with BM were subsequently treated with palliative therapy. Multivariate analysis showed that compared with no treatment, brain radiotherapy alone (HR: 0.131, 95%CI: 0.035-0.491, P=0.003) and radiotherapy combined with chemotherapy (HR: 0.039, 95%CI: 0.008-0.194, P<0.001) significantly reduced the risk of death. Multiple BM (HR: 2.391, 95%CI: 1.082-5.285, P=0.031) was an independent adverse prognostic factor for OS. Conclusion: LS-SCLC patients who achieved good response after chest chemoradiotherapy without receiving PCI were prone to develop BM and have a poor prognosis. Multiple BM was an independent adverse prognostic factor. PCI remains the standard of care for LS-SCLC patients.

Effect of Segmental Abutting Esophagus-Sparing Technique to Reduce Severe Esophagitis in Limited-Stage Small-Cell Lung Cancer Patients Treated with Concurrent Hypofractionated Thoracic Radiation and Chemotherapy.

The aim of the current study is to evaluate the effect of segmental abutting esophagus-sparing (SAES) radiotherapy on reducing severe acute esophagitis in patients with limited-stage small-cell lung cancer treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy. Thirty patients were enrolled from the experimental arm (45 Gy in 3 Gy daily fractions in 3 weeks) of an ongoing phase III trial (NCT02688036). The whole esophagus was divided into the involved esophagus and the abutting esophagus (AE) according to the distance from the edge of the clinical target volume. All dosimetric parameters were significantly reduced for the whole esophagus and AE. The maximal and mean doses of the esophagus (47.4 ± 1.9 Gy and 13.5 ± 5.8 Gy, respectively) and AE (42.9 ± 2.3 Gy and 8.6 ± 3.6 Gy, respectively) in the SAES plan were significantly lower than those (esophagus 48.0 ± 1.9 Gy and 14.7± 6.1 Gy, AE 45.1 ± 2.4 Gy and 9.8 ± 4.2 Gy, respectively) in the non-SAES plan. With a median follow-up of 12.5 months, only one patient (3.3%) developed grade 3 acute esophagitis, and no grade 4-5 events happened. SAES radiotherapy has significant dosimetric advantages, which are successfully translated into clinical benefits and provide good feasibility for dose escalation to improve local control and prognosis in the future.

Retrospective Clinical Study on Integrated Chinese and Western Medicine in Treatment of Limited-Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the efficacy of integrated Chinese and Western medicine extending the progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of limited-stage small cell lung cancer (LS-SCLC) patients after the first-line chemoradiotherapy. METHODS: The data of 67 LS-SCLC patients who received combined treatment of CM and Western medicine (WM) between January 2013 and May 2020 at the outpatient clinic of Guang'anmen Hospital were retrospectively analyzed. Thirty-six LS-SCLC patients who received only WM treatment was used as the WM control group. The medical data of the two groups were statistically analyzed. Survival analysis was performed using the product-limit method (Kaplan-Meier analysis). The median OS and PFS were calculated, and survival curves were compared by the Log rank test. The cumulative survival rates at 1, 2, and 5 years were estimated by the life table analysis. Stratified survival analysis was performed between patients with different CM administration time. RESULTS: The median PFS in the CM and WM combination treatment group and the WM group were 19 months (95% CI: 12.357-25.643) vs. 9 months (95% CI: 5.957-12.043), HR=0.43 (95% CI: 0.27-0.69, P<0.001), respectively. The median OS in the CM and WM combination group and the WM group were 34 months (95% CI could not be calculated) vs. 18.63 months (95% CI: 16.425-20.835), HR=0.40 (95% CI: 0.24-0.66, P<0.001), respectively. Similar results were obtained in the further stratified analysis of whether the duration of CM administration exceeded 18 and 24 months (P<0.001). CONCLUSION: The combination treatment of CM and WM with continuing oral administration of CM treatment after the first-line chemoradiotherapy for LS-SCLC patients produced better prognosis, lower risks of progression, and longer survival than the WM treatment alone. (Registration No. ChiCTR2200056616).

Primary pulmonary T-cell lymphoproliferative disorders with a limited-stage, low proliferative index, and unusual clinical behavior: two cases of a rare occurrence.

Extranodal T-lymphoproliferative disorders or T-cell lymphomas (TLPD) are classified according to the WHO Classification (4th and upcoming 5th editions) (Swerdlow et al., IARC Press 1; Alaggio et al., Leukemia 36(7):1720-1748, 2) and to the International Consensus Classification Update (Campo et al., Blood 140(11):1229-1253, 3) upon several morphologic, phenotypic, and genetic features. None of those at present included has been characterized by primary pulmonary onset. We herein present two such cases which, to the best of our knowledge, have not been previously reported and that might represent another variant of T-cell proliferation at mucosal sites. The two cases share similar histological and phenotypic features, suggesting an origin from CD4 + effector memory T cells with the expression of a CD279/PD-1 antigen. They are both monoclonal, harbor few mutations, and show no disease progression outside the lung. They only differ concerning the local extension of the process and clinical setting. The two cases are examples of so far unreported primary pulmonary TLDP, with limited stage and low proliferative index. A possible relationship with a local yet unknown inflammatory trigger that might have favored the development of the T-cell clone cannot be ruled out.

Association between radiotherapy protocol variations and outcome in the CONVERT trial.

Background: Radiotherapy quality assurance (QA) is integral to radiotherapy delivery. Here we report comprehensive contouring, dosimetry, and treatment delivery QA, describe protocol compliance, and detail the impact of protocol variations on acute grade ≥3 toxicity, progression free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) in the phase III CONVERT trial. Materials/Methods: Radiotherapy planning data from one hundred randomly selected patients were requested. Members of the CONVERT Trial Management Group (TMG) recontoured the heart, lung, and spinal cord organs at risk (OAR) according to the trial guideline. The existing radiotherapy plan were re-applied to the new structures and the new dosimetric data were recollected. Compliance with radiotherapy QA components were recorded and radiotherapy QA components were pooled into protocol variations: acceptable, acceptable variation, and unacceptable variation. Univariable analysis with a Cox proportional hazards model established the relationship between protocol variations and patient outcome. Results: Ninety-three cases were submitted for retrospective radiotherapy QA review. Demographics of the radiotherapy QA cohort (n=93) matched the non-QA (n=450) cohort. 97.8% of gross tumour volume (GTV) contours were protocol compliant. OAR contours were non-compliant in 79.6% instances of the heart, 37.6% lung, and 75.3% spinal cord. Of the non-compliant heart contours, 86.5% and 2.7% had contours caudal and cranial to the protocol-defined heart borders. 10.8% did not include the pericardial sac and 2.7% did not include the anterior aspect of the pericardium. Eleven (11.8%) submissions exceeded protocol-defined dosimetric heart constraints; six of which were only noted on the application of protocol-compliant contours. Unacceptable variations were not associated with an increase in grade 3 toxicity (p=0.808), PFS (p=0.232), or OS (p=0.743). Conclusion: Non-protocol compliant heart contours were associated with increased dose delivered to the heart OAR, with 11.8 % of submitted heart structures exceeding protocol-defined constraints. In this QA cohort of patients with small cell lung cancer, unacceptable variations were not associated with acute grade ≥3 toxicity, PFS, or OS. Radiotherapy QA remains the cornerstone of high-quality radiotherapy delivery and should be embedded into clinical trial and non-clinical trial practice; clinical trials should report standardised radiotherapy QA parameters alongside trial outcomes.