Radiation proctitis after iodine-125 low-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy utilizing SpaceOAR hydrogel.

OBJECTIVE: We retrospectively evaluated the efficacy of combining the SpaceOAR (SOAR) hydrogel with prostate brachytherapy, using colonoscopy findings to assess for radiation proctitis. METHODS: Among 731 patients undergoing iodine-125 low-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy (LDR-BT), SOAR was utilized in 394 patients (53.9%). Colonoscopy was performed for 97 patients (13.3%) to assess the presence, location, condition, and treatment of radiation proctitis. We also investigated treatment factors associated with the occurrence of radiation proctitis. RESULTS: Radiation proctitis was observed in 57 patients (7.8%) and 17 (2.3%) were treated with argon plasma coagulation (APC). The incidence of radiation proctitis was 12.2% in the non-SOAR and 4.1% in the SOAR group (p < 0.001). In the non-SOAR group, the incidence of radiation proctitis was 6.6% for LDR-BT monotherapy and increased to 22.0% when combined with external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) (p = 0.001). However, in the SOAR group, these rates significantly decreased to 3.3% and 5.7% for monotherapy and combination therapy, respectively (p = 0.035, p < 0.001). With SOAR, inflammation was observed directly above the DL in most patients (87.5%), and only one patient (6.3%) required APC. The absence of SOAR (p < 0.001, HR = 0.29) and the concurrent use of EBRT (p = 0.018, HR = 2.87) were identified as significant risk factors for the occurrence of radiation proctitis. CONCLUSION: The use of SOAR significantly reduced the incidence of radiation proctitis in patients undergoing LDR-BT monotherapy and combined EBRT. Inflammation primarily occurred directly above the DL; further examination is necessary to clarify its cause.

The influence of Gleason score ≤ 6 histology on the outcome of high-risk localized prostate cancer after modern radiotherapy.

We aimed to retrospectively review outcomes in patients with high-risk prostate cancer and a Gleason score ≤ 6 following modern radiotherapy. We analyzed the outcomes of 1374 patients who had undergone modern radiotherapy, comprising a high-risk low grade [HRLG] group (Gleason score ≤ 6; n = 94) and a high-risk high grade [HRHG] group (Gleason score ≥ 7, n = 1125). We included 955 patients who received brachytherapy with or without external beam radio-therapy (EBRT) and 264 who received modern EBRT (intensity-modulated radiotherapy [IMRT] or stereotactic body radiotherapy [SBRT]). At a median follow-up of 60 (2-177) months, actuarial 5-year biochemical failure-free survival rates were 97.8 and 91.8% (p = 0.017), respectively. The frequency of clinical failure in the HRLG group was less than that in the HRHG group (0% vs 5.4%, p = 0.012). The HRLG group had a better 5-year distant metastasis-free survival than the HRHG group (100% vs 96.0%, p = 0.035). As the HRLG group exhibited no clinical failure and better outcomes than the HRHG group, the HRLG group might potentially be classified as a lower-risk group.

Urinary tract symptoms that should be improved to enhance post-operative urinary quality of life in patients treated with low-dose-rate brachytherapy for prostate cancer: An importance-performance analysis.

Purpose: To evaluate international prostate symptom score and urinary quality of life in patients with prostate cancer who underwent low-dose-rate brachytherapy, and to identify lower urinary tract symptoms that must be improved to enhance post-operative urinary quality of life and factors associated with lower urinary tract symptoms. Material and methods: This study included 193 patients who underwent low-dose-rate brachytherapy alone (145 Gy). Importance-performance analysis was conducted to identify lower urinary tract symptoms that should be prioritized to improve urinary quality of life. Association between lower urinary tract symptom scores and each factor was investigated. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was used to evaluate dosimetric parameters related to lower urinary tract symptom score to predict an average score of ≥ 3. Cut-off values were determined. Results: One to nine months post-implantation was a period of significantly increased urinary quality of life scores compared with baseline (p < 0.05 each). The importance-performance analysis conducted for 1-9 months revealed that frequency, nocturia, and weak stream required improvement. Multivariate analysis showed that each lower urinary tract symptom score presented a significant association with its baseline value (p < 0.001 each, positive correlation). Frequency, incomplete emptying, urgency, and straining scores were significantly associated with prostate volume, whereas weak stream and intermittency scores were associated with dose covering 90% of the prostate and dose covering 90% of the urethra, respectively (p < 0.05 each, positive correlations). Cut-off values for these doses were 167.01 Gy and 136.84 Gy, respectively. Conclusions: This study highlights the importance of prioritizing specific lower urinary tract symptoms for improvement in post-operative urinary quality of life, and identifies the associated factors that can help in personalized treatment planning and goal-setting for better patient satisfaction.

Impact of Dose Perturbations Around Brachytherapy Seeds in External-Beam Radiotherapy Planning: A Fundamental and Clinical Validation Using Treatment Planning System-Based Monte Carlo Simulations.

Background This study evaluates dose perturbations caused by nonradioactive seeds in clinical cases by employing treatment planning system-based Monte Carlo (TPS-MC) simulation. Methodology We investigated dose perturbation using a water-equivalent phantom and 20 clinical cases of prostate cancer (10 cases with seeds and 10 cases without seeds) treated at Fujita Health University Hospital, Japan. First, dose calculations for a simple geometry were performed using the RayStation MC algorithm for a water-equivalent phantom with and without a seed. TPS-independent Monte Carlo (full-MC) simulations and film measurements were conducted to verify the accuracy of TPS-MC simulation. Subsequently, dose calculations using TPS-MC were performed on CT images of clinical cases of prostate cancer with and without seeds, and the dose distributions were compared. Results In clinical cases, dose calculations using MC simulations revealed hotspots around the seeds. However, the size of the hotspot was not correlated with the number of seeds. The maximum difference in dose perturbation between TPS-MC simulations and film measurements was 3.9%, whereas that between TPS-MC simulations and full-MC simulations was 3.7%. The dose error of TPS-MC was negligible for multiple beams or rotational irradiation. Conclusions Hotspots were observed in dose calculations using TPS-MC performed on CT images of clinical cases with seeds. The dose calculation accuracy around the seeds using TPS-MC simulations was comparable to that of film measurements and full-MC simulations, with differences within 3.9%. Although the clinical impact of hotspots occurring around the seeds is minimal, utilizing MC simulations on TPSs can be beneficial to verify their presence.

Clinical Efficacy and Openness to New Challenges of Low Dose Rate Brachytherapy for Prostate Cancer.

Over a century ago, low-dose-rate (LDR) brachytherapy was introduced to treat prostate cancer (PCa). Since then, it has been widely applied worldwide, including in East Asia. LDR brachytherapy has been performed in 88 institutes in Japan. Beneficial clinical outcomes of LDR brachytherapy for intermediate-to-high-risk PCa have been demonstrated in large clinical trials. These clinical outcomes were achieved through advances in methods, such as urological precise needle puncture and seed placement, and the quantitative decision making regarding radiological parameters by radiation oncologists. The combined use of LDR brachytherapy with other therapeutic modalities, such as external beam radiation and androgen deprivation therapy, for the clinical risk classification of PCa has led to better anticancer treatment efficacy. In this study, we summarized basic LDR brachytherapy findings that should remain unchanged and be passed down in urology departments. We also discussed the applications of LDR brachytherapy for PCa in various clinical settings, including focal and salvage therapies. In addition, we highlighted technologies associated with brachytherapy that are under development.

The oncologic and safety outcomes of low-dose-rate brachytherapy for the treatment of prostate cancer.

Around 40 years have passed since a modern low-dose-rate (LDR) brachytherapy for prostate cancer was introduced. LDR brachytherapy has become one of the definitive treatment options besides radical prostatectomy (RP) and external beam radiation therapy (EBRT). LDR brachytherapy has several advantages over EBRT such as a higher prescribed dose to the prostate gland while avoiding unnecessary irradiation of organs at risk, a precipitous dose gradient, a brief treatment time, and a short hospital stay. Previous reports revealed that the long-term oncologic outcomes of LDR brachytherapy are superior to those of EBRT. The oncologic outcomes of low- to intermediate-risk patients are equivalent to those of RP using the recurrence definition of surgery of prostate specific antigen (PSA) >0.2 ng/mL, while the oncologic outcomes of LDR brachytherapy as tri-modality (combined EBRT and androgen deprivation therapy) for high-risk patients is superior to that of RP using the recurrence definition of surgery. In respect of toxicity, urinary disorders such as urgency and frequency are often observed after the acute phase of treatment, but these events usually resolve, while the quality of life of urinary continence is well preserved for a long time. Erectile function decreases yearly, but is relatively preserved compared to RP. In conclusion, the most noteworthy strength of LDR brachytherapy for low- to intermediate-risk patients is the "brief treatment time" that provides long recurrence-free survival, while that for high-risk patients who received LDR brachytherapy (tri-modality) is "excellent disease control."

Effect of Positive Biopsy Core Rate on Low-dose-rate Brachytherapy Outcomes in Intermediate-risk Prostate Cancer.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Intermediate-risk prostate cancer (PCa) is a highly heterogeneous disease. Although low-dose-rate brachytherapy (LDR-BT) is mainly used for low- to intermediate-risk PCa, limited reports have evaluated the detailed differences in outcomes, including differences between patients with ISUP grade group (GG) 2 and GG3 intermediate-risk PCa. This study aimed to investigate the differences in outcomes between intermediate-risk Japanese patients with GG2 and GG3 PCa who underwent LDR-BT. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This single-center retrospective study included 342 consecutive patients with intermediate-risk PCa; 232 patients with GG2 and 110 with GG3 were treated with LDR-BT at Tokushima University Hospital between July 2004 and December 2019. RESULTS: No significant difference in 5-year biochemical progression-free survival and cancer-specific survival was observed between patients with GG2 and those with GG3 (p=0.649 and p=0.633, respectively). Multivariate analysis showed that radiation doses up to 90% of the prostate volume (D90) and the percentage of positive cores were predictors of recurrence in all patients with intermediate-risk PCa. Group analyses showed that D90 was a predictor for recurrence in patients with GG2. In contrast, a high percentage of positive cores was a significant risk factor for recurrence in patients with GG3. CONCLUSION: Positive core ratios observed on prostate biopsy correlated with higher recurrence rates after LDR-BT. This indicates that the proportion of positive cores in the biopsy may be an important factor in predicting the likelihood of recurrence, especially for patients with GG3 PCa.

Current status and issues with the dosimetric assay of iodine-125 seed sources at medical facilities in Japan: a questionnaire-based survey†.

In conducting dosimetric assays of seed sources containing iodine-125 (125I), several major guidelines require the medical physicist to verify the source strength before patient treatment. Japanese guidelines do not mandate dosimetric assays at medical facilities, but since 2017, three incidents have occurred in Japan wherein seeds with incorrect strengths were delivered to medical facilities. Therefore, this study aimed to survey the current situation and any barriers to conducting the dosimetric assay of iodine-125 seeds at medical facilities in Japan. We conducted a questionnaire-based survey from December 2020 to April 2021, to examine whether seed assay and verification of the number of seeds delivered were being performed. We found that only 9 facilities (16%) performed seed assay and 28 (52%) verified the number of seeds. None of the facilities used an assay method that ensured traceability. The reasons for not performing an assay were divided into two categories: lack of resources and legal issues. Lack of resources included lack of instruments, lack of knowledge of assay methods, shorthand, or all of the above, whereas legal issues included the inability to resterilize iodine-125 seeds distributed in Japan and/or purchase seeds dedicated to the assay. Dosimetric assays, including simple methods, are effective in detecting calibration date errors and non-radioactive seeds. The study findings suggest that familiarization of medical personnel with these assay methods and investigation of the associated costs of labor and equipment should be recommended, as these measures will lead to medical reimbursement for quality assurance.

Clinical characteristics of secondary bladder cancer developing after low-/high-dose-rate brachytherapy to treat localized prostate cancer.

BACKGROUND: To explore correlations between the clinical attributes of secondary bladder cancer and brachytherapy, we retrospectively reviewed our institutional database on patients with localized prostate cancer who underwent low-dose-rate brachytherapy (LDR-BT) or high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT) with or without external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) or radical prostatectomy (RP). METHODS: From October 2003 to December 2014, 2551 patients with localized prostate cancer were treated at our institution. Of these, data on 2163 were available (LDR-BT alone: n = 953; LDR-TB with EBRT: n = 181; HDR-BT with EBRT: n = 283; RP without EBRT: n = 746). The times of secondary bladder cancer development subsequent to radical treatment, and their clinical characteristics, were studied. RESULTS: Age-adjusted Cox's regression analyses indicated that brachytherapy did not significantly impact the incidence of secondary bladder cancer. However, the pathological characteristics of such cancer differed between patients treated via brachytherapy and RP without EBRT; invasive bladder cancer was more common in such patients. CONCLUSION: The risk for secondary bladder cancer was not significantly increased after brachytherapy compared to non-irradiation therapy. However, brachytherapy patients exhibited a higher incidence of invasive bladder cancer. Therefore, meticulous follow-up is crucial for early detection and treatment of bladder cancer in such patients.

Chronological Changes of Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms in Elderly Patients with Prostate Cancer after Low-Dose-Rate Prostate Brachytherapy.

BACKGROUND: To compare chronological changes in lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) after low-dose-rate prostate extended-release therapy (LDR-BT) using the overactive bladder symptom score (OABSS) in patients aged ≥ 75 years (elderly group) versus those aged < 75 years (control group). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with prostate cancer who underwent LDR-BT at Gifu University Hospital were included in this study. The International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), OABSS, and quality of life-based on urinary symptoms (IPSS-QOL) were evaluated before and after LDR-BT. We compared chronological changes in IPSS, OABSS, and IPSS-QOL in the elderly group with those in the control group and assessed the association between the resolution of OABSS and clinicopathological covariates. RESULTS: A total of 484 patients were enrolled in this study. In the elderly group, the total IPSS, OABSS, and frequency scores increased at 1 month postoperatively, whereas the control group showed an increase at 3 months postoperatively. Multivariate analysis identified changes from baseline to the maximum OABSS and pre-treatment OABSS as significant predictors of delayed resolution of OABSS after LDR-BT. CONCLUSIONS: Changes in pre-treatment OABSS and pre- and post-LDR-BT OABSS values were independent predictors of delayed resolution of OABSS; however, no correlation was found with age.

Effect of Adequate Local Radiation Dose on Oncological Outcomes in Localized Prostate Cancer Patients Treated With Low-dose-rate Brachytherapy.

BACKGROUND/AIM: We retrospectively investigated the effect of a biologically effective dose (BED) of Low-dose rate brachytherapy (LDR-BT) and its possible interaction with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) during LDR-BT treatment for intermediate-risk prostate cancer (PCa). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 693 patients with localized, intermediate-risk PCa, who underwent LDR-BT with or without supplemental external beam radiotherapy, were included in this study. We stratified patients into two groups according to BED (<180 Gy2, lower BED group; ≥180 Gy2, higher BED group) and evaluated the effect of ADT duration on the oncological outcomes of each group. RESULTS: In total, 431 patients received BED ≥180 Gy2. Significant differences in biochemical recurrence-free survival (BCRFS) and clinical progression-free survival (CPFS) were observed among the non-ADT, ADT ≤3 months, and ADT >3 months subgroups of the lower BED group (p=0.005 and 0.049, respectively). However, no significant differences in BCRFS or CPFS were detected in the higher BED group (p=0.63 and 0.76, respectively). Multivariate analysis of BCR and CP in the lower BED group revealed a significant decreasing trend in the BCRFS (p for trend=0.001) and CPFS rates (p for trend=0.015) as ADT duration increased, which was associated with favorable outcomes. However, no significant trend was observed in the BCRFS or CPFS rate in the higher BED group. CONCLUSION: An adequate local radiation dose provides favorable oncological outcomes and could potentially reduce the need for long-term ADT.

The direct prognosis comparison of 125I low-dose-rate brachytherapy versus laparoscopic radical prostatectomy for patients with intermediate-risk prostate cancer.

BACKGROUND: This study aims to compare the clinical outcomes after performing radical prostatectomy (RP) or low-dose-rate brachytherapy (LDR) for patients with intermediate-risk prostate cancer (IRPC). METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis on 361 IRPC patients who underwent treatment in Peking Union Medical College Hospital from January 2014 to August 2021, of which 160 underwent RP and 201 underwent Iodine-125 LDR. Patients were followed in clinic monthly during the first three months and at three-month intervals thereafter. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were conducted to predict biochemical relapse-free survival (bRFS), clinical relapse-free survival (cRFS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and overall survival (OS). Biochemical recurrence was defined using the Phoenix definition for LDR and the surgical definition for RP. The log-rank test was applied to compare bRFS between the two modalities, and Cox regression analysis was performed to identify factors associated with bRFS. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 54 months for RP and 69 months for LDR. According to log-rank test, the differences of 5-year bRFS (70.2% vs 83.2%, P = 0.003) and 8-year bRFS (63.1% vs 68.9%, P < 0.001) between RP and LDR groups were statistically significant. Our results also indicated that there was no significant difference in terms of cRFS, CSS, or OS between the two groups. With multivariate analysis of the entire cohort, prostate volume ≤ 30 ml (P < 0.001), positive margin (P < 0.001), and percentage positive biopsy cores > 50% (P < 0.001) were independent factors suggestive of worse bRFS. CONCLUSIONS: LDR is a reasonable treatment option for IRPC patients, yielding improved bRFS and equivalent rates of cRFS, CSS and OS when compared with RP.

Tolerance limit of external beam radiotherapy combined with low-dose rate brachytherapy in normal rabbit tissue.

BACKGROUND: Dosage-optimized multimodal radiotherapies that are safe for head and neck cancer patients are desirable. In this study, we investigated tissue tolerance to varying doses of external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) combined with low-dose rate brachytherapy in the neck of a rabbit model. METHODS: Twenty rabbits were used in the four test groups (five each) with iodine-125 seeds implanted in the neck treated with EBRT in four doses at 50, 40, 30 and 20 Gy each. Twelve rabbits for three control groups (four each). Three months after implantation, all rabbits were euthanized, and target tissues were collected. Analyses included seed implantation assessment, histopathological evaluation, immunohistochemistry staining, terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase dUTP nick end labeling assay, electron microscopy and statistics with the SPSS software. RESULTS: Five rabbits died in the four test groups, and three rabbits died in the three control groups (one per group), which showed no significant difference by survival analysis. The calculated minimum peripheral dose was 17.6 Gy, the maximum dose near the seed was 1812.5 Gy, the D90 was 34.5 Gy and the mean dose was 124.5 Gy. In all groups that received radiation, apoptosis occurred primarily in the esophageal mucosa and corresponded to the dose of radiation; a higher dose caused a greater apoptosis, with significant difference between groups (P < 0.05). Electron microscopy of carotid arteries revealed that endothelial cells were swollen and some were shed from basement membrane, but no other noticeable tissue damages. CONCLUSIONS: Limited EBRT at maximal dose (50 Gy) combined with the brachytherapy interstitially applied to the neck was tolerated well in the rabbit model.

Direct Comparison of Two Different Definitions with Biochemical Recurrence after Low-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy for Prostate Cancer.

We aimed to determine whether biochemical recurrence-free survival (BRFS) of patients with prostate cancer (PCa) who received low-dose-rate brachytherapy (LDR-BT) differed according to the definition of biochemical recurrence (BCR) after radical prostatectomy (RP) and the definition given by the Japanese Prostate Cancer Outcome Study of Permanent Iodine-125 Seed Implantation (J-POPS). We reviewed the clinical records of 476 consecutive patients with PCa who received LDR-BT at the Gifu University Hospital. The primary endpoint of this study was the difference in BRFS between the two aforementioned definitions. When the follow-up period ended, 74 (15.5%) and 20 (4.2%) patients had BCR according to the RP and J-POPS definitions, respectively. The 5-year BRFS rates were 85.0% and 96.9% for the RP and J-POPS definitions, respectively (p < 0.005). According to the RP definition, the 5-year BRFS rates were 80.6% in the group aged <63 years and 86.6% in those aged ≥63 years (p = 0.050). According to the J-POPS definition, the 5-year BRFS rates were 94.1% and 97.8% in the groups aged <63 years and ≥63 years, respectively (p = 0.005). The definition of recurrence in LDR-BT may need to be reconsidered.

Comparison of outcomes in high-risk prostate cancer patients treated with low-/high-dose-rate brachytherapy plus external beam radiotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Although brachytherapy is a standard treatment option for patients with high-risk prostate cancer, only a few studies have compared low-dose-rate brachytherapy (LDR-BT) and high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT). We applied propensity score-based inverse probability treatment weighting (IPTW) to compare oncological outcomes for LDR-BT and HDR-BT. METHODS: We retrospectively assessed prognosis in 392 patients with high-risk localized prostate cancer who had undergone brachytherapy plus external beam radiation. IPTW was applied to adjust the Kaplan-Meier survival analyses and Cox proportional hazards regression analyses, with the goal of minimizing bias from patient background. RESULTS: The IPTW-adjusted Kaplan-Meier survival analyses showed no statistically significant differences for time to biochemical recurrence, clinical progression, castration-resistant prostate cancer, or death from any cause. The IPTW-adjusted Cox regression analyses also showed that the modality of brachytherapy was not an independent factor in these oncological outcomes. Notably, the two groups differed regarding complications; LDR-BT was associated with a higher rate of acute grade ≥ 2 GU toxicity, and late grade 3 toxicity was noted only in HDR-BT. CONCLUSION: Our analysis of long-term outcomes in patients with high-risk localized prostate cancer shows no significant differences in oncological outcomes between LDR-BT and HDR-BT, but some differences in toxicity, and offers patients and clinicians useful information in deciding management strategies for high-risk localized prostate cancer.

Long-term outcomes of radical prostatectomy versus low-dose-rate brachytherapy in patients with intermediate-risk prostate cancer: Propensity score matched comparison.

PURPOSE: To compare long-term outcomes of radical prostatectomy (RP) and low-dose-rate brachytherapy (LDR-BT) using propensity score-matched analysis in patients with clinically localized, intermediate-risk prostate cancer (PCa). METHODS: Between October 2003 and March 2014, our institution treated 1241 patients with intermediate-risk PCa (RP: n = 531; LDR-BT: n = 710). Biochemical recurrence (BCR) was defined as prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels of 0.2 ng/ml or greater for RP, and as PSA nadir plus 2 ng/ml or higher (Phoenix definition) for LDR-BT. We calculated propensity scores by multivariate logistic regression based on covariates that included age, pretreatment PSA, biopsy Gleason grade, the percentage of positive biopsy cores (PPBC), and clinical T stage. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 108 months for RP and 99 months for LDR-BT. After propensity score adjustment, a total of 642 (321 each) patients remained for further analysis. Kaplan-Meier curves showed no statistically significant difference in overall survival (OS) (p = 0.99). LDR-BT was associated with improved BCR-free survival and salvage therapy-free survival  compared to RP (p < 0.001), and RP was associated with improved metastasis-free survival (MFS, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: BCR cannot be a surrogate for survival comparison, primarily due to differences between treatment modalities in how this term was defined post-therapy. Long-term follow-up showed that RP was associated with lower MFS in intermediate-risk PCa. However, this has not yet translated into superior OS.

Chronological changes of lower urinary tract symptoms after low-dose-rate brachytherapy for prostate cancer using SpaceOAR® system.

Background: The aim of this study is to investigate chronological changes of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) in patients with prostate cancer who underwent low-dose-rate brachytherapy (LDR-BT) followed by the insertion of SpaceOAR® system (SpaceOAR). Methods: In this retrospective study, 483 patients with localized prostate cancer underwent LDR-BT at the Gifu University Hospital between August 2004 and December 2020. SpaceOAR was inserted in 30 patients after LDR-BT (SpaceOAR group), and 453 patients received LDR-BT alone (non-SpaceOAR group). The International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), Overactive Bladder Symptom Score (OABSS), quality of life due to urinary symptoms (IPSS-QOL), and uroflowmetry (UFM), including maximum flow rate (Qmax), voided volume, and post-voided residual urine (PVR), were evaluated before LDR-BT, and at 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months after LDR-BT. The outcomes were chronological changes in IPSS, OABSS, and IPSS-QOL compared to pretreatment values and those of covariates in relation to UFM. Results: The IPSS, OABSS, IPSS-QOL, Qmax, and voided volume were not significantly associated with either group. According to the PVR interaction effect, the insertion of SpaceOAR was significantly affected by chronological changes in PVR (P = 0.001). Three months after LDR-BT, PVR in the SpaceOAR group was significantly higher than that in the non-SpaceOAR group (49.8 mL vs. 30.5 mL; P = 0.002). Conclusion: SpaceOAR use may temporally increase PVR; however, IPSS, OABSS, IPSS-QOL, Qmax, and voided volume were not significantly associated with LUTS before and after LDR-BT. The combination of LDR-BT and SpaceOAR may be acceptable for treating patients with prostate cancer regarding the chronological changes in LUTS after brachytherapy.

A new technique for trans-perirectal iodine-125 seed implantation in prostatic cancer guided by CT and 3D printed template: Two case reports.

Low-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy with permanent iodine-125 is an important curative treatment for low-risk prostate cancer, and it has been demonstrated that brachytherapy with permanent seeds is an effective treatment. However, differences in prostate volume, spatial location, and gland deformation between images obtained in the pre-planning phase and those obtained during the implantation procedure affect accurate delivery of the pre-planned dose. Furthermore, the complicated procedure could be a burden to elderly patients, for example, the risks associated with general anesthesia. In addition, ultrasound images are not as clear as computed tomography (CT) images with regard to identifying the location of seeds. Therefore, a new method for guidance during the procedure is urgently needed. Here, we have described a new method for precise trans-perirectal insertion of radioactive iodine-125 seeds in patients with prostate cancer under the guidance of CT and a 3D-printed template. These are some of the advantages of this technique over the standard procedure for seed implantation in the prostate: It requires only local anesthesia, the pre-planning phase can be completed before the procedure, and the operation time is considerably shorter. This report describes trans-pararectal iodine-125 seed brachytherapy for prostate cancer under local anesthesia and the guidance of a 3D printed template in two elderly patients. The dose parameters determined in the preoperative planning phase were verified postoperatively and found to be consistent. Further, the procedure was completely successfully with no major complications in both cases, and the patients' prostate-specific antigen levels were normal at the most recent follow-up conducted 50 months after the procedure. Therefore, this technique seems promising for prostate cancer brachytherapy, and its application needs to be researched and extended further in the future.

Assessment of combined modality therapy for non-small-cell lung carcinoma: A simulation study concerning concurrent chemo-brachytherapy.

Although surgery is the treatment of choice for early-stage non-small-cell lung carcinoma, almost two-thirds of patients do not have acceptable pulmonary function for extensive surgeries. The alternative approach for this large group of patients is sublobar resection along with low-dose-rate (LDR) brachytherapy (BT). However, patients with resected lungs have a high risk of recurrence and are often treated with platinum-based (Pt-based) chemotherapy (CT). In this study, we aimed to evaluate the absorbed doses of lung and other thoracic organs, considering concurrent chemo-BT with LDR sources in two modalities: conventional vs. unconventional Pt-based CT. We used the MCNPX code for simulations and to obtain the lung absorbed dose, dose enhancement factor (DEF), and Pt threshold concentration for the abovementioned modalities. Our results indicate that DEF correlates directly with Pt concentration at prescription point and is inversely correlated with depth. Dose enhancement for conventional CT concurrent with BT is <2%, while it is >2% in case of unconventional Pt-based CT wherein the Pt concentration exceeds 0.2 mg/g lung tissue. Also, the absorbed dose of healthy thoracic organs decreased by 2-11% in the latter approach. In conclusion, the concurrent chemo-BT in the lung environment could enhance the therapeutic doses merely by using unconventional CT methods, while lung Pt accumulation exceeds 0.2 mg/g.

Local dose (biologically effective dose ≥180 Gy2) is an important predictor of biochemical recurrence in patients undergoing low-dose-rate brachytherapy.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate prognostic factors of biochemical recurrence (BCR) in each risk group of prostate cancer patients who underwent low-dose-rate brachytherapy (LDR-BT). METHODS: A total of 944 patients with clinically confirmed prostate cancer (cT1c-3aN0M0) who had underwent LDR-BT were enrolled. The low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups included 278, 498, and 168 patients, respectively. The median age, PSA value at diagnosis, and the follow-up period were 70 years (range: 48-84), 7.2 ng/ml (range: 1.2-113), and 91 months (range: 2-192), respectively. We evaluated the BCR-free rate, BCR-free survival, clinical recurrence-free rate, overall survival (OS), and cancer-specific survival (CSS). We conducted multivariate analysis to elucidate prognostic factors of BCR for all patients and for each risk group. RESULTS: The 5- and 10-year OS rates were 96.0% and 89.5% and the 5- and 10-year CSS rates were 99.8% and 99.1%, respectively, while the 5- and 10-year BCR-free rates were 96.6% and 92.5% in low-risk patients, 95.7% and 90.7% in intermediate-risk patients and 93.8% and 89.0% in high-risk patients, respectively. There were no significant differences between the risk groups. Age-adjusted multivariate analysis indicated biologically effective dose (BED) <180 Gy2 as an independent prognostic factor of BCR in all patients (p = 0.005). There were no independent factors in the low- and high-risk groups, but neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) (p = 0.022) and BED <180Gy2 (p = 0.042) were independent prognostic factors in the intermediate-risk group. CONCLUSIONS: LDR-BT can achieve a higher recurrence-free survival with an adequate local radiation dose (BED ≥ 180 Gy2).