Percutaneous lumbopelvic fixation is effective in the management of unstable transverse sacral fractures.

OBJECTIVES: Historically, fractures causing lumbopelvic dissociation have been managed with open lumbosacral fusion and instrumentation. Our aim was to evaluate outcomes and complications following surgical management of unstable transverse sacral fractures with percutaneous lumbopelvic fixation. METHODS: Design: Retrospective case series. SETTING: Academic Single Center, Level I Trauma Center. Patient Selection Criteria: Patients with lumbopelvic dissociation undergoing surgery. Outcome Measures and Comparisons: Patient demographics, mechanism of injury, ISS, associated injuries, radiographic classification (Roy-Camille), patient-reported outcomes (PROMIS PI, PF, D, and ODI), and complications were collected. RESULTS: 27 patients were enrolled with an average follow-up of 18.7 ± 17.6 months and age of 54.4 ± 25.1 years. All patients underwent lumbar pedicle screw and iliac screw placement. Sacral laminectomy was performed if the patient had a preoperative neurological deficit. Patients were counseled on instrumentation removal at 6-12 months. 67 % of patients sustained a fall, and 33 % were involved in an MVA. 52 % were Roy-Camille Type 2, and 32 % and 20 % were Types 1 and 3, respectively. The mean EBL was 261 ± 400 ml. 37 % required concurrent sacral laminectomy. There were no intraoperative complications and four postoperative complications, including surgical site infection, rod dislodgment, and deep venous thrombosis. 63 % underwent removal of instrumentation after fracture healing. ODI scores significantly improved from 6 weeks post-op (35.5 ± 4.5) to one-year follow-up (18.3 ± 9.6, p = 0.005), two-year follow-up (20.3 ± 10.0, p = 0.03), and final follow-up (16.4 ± 8.8, p = 0.002). Statistically significant improvements were observed in the PROMIS PI, PF, and D domains (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrates that lumbopelvic instrumentation leads to successful management of unstable transverse sacral fractures, with improvement in PRO. The combination of percutaneous instrumentation without arthrodesis did not result in any fracture non-union. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.

L4 fixation is not necessary in L5-Iliac spinopelvic fixation after trauma, but coadjutant transilio-transsacral fixation is.

INTRODUCTION: Spinopelvic dissociation (SPD) is a severe injury characterized by a discontinuity between the spine and the bony pelvis consisting of a bilateral longitudinal sacral fracture, most of the times through sacral neuroforamen, and a horizontal fracture, usually through the S1 or S2 body. The introduction of the concept of triangular osteosynthesis has shown to be an advance in the stability of spinopelvic fixation (SPF). However, a controversy exists as to whether the spinal fixation should reach up to L4 and, if so, it should be combined with transiliac-transsacral screws (TTS). OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to compare the biomechanical behavior in the laboratory of four different osteosynthesis constructs for SPD, including spinopelvic fixation of L5 versus L4 and L5; along with or without TTS in both cases. MATERIAL AND METHODS: By means of a formerly described method by the authors, an unstable standardized H-type sacral fracture in twenty synthetic replicas of a male pelvis articulated to the lumbar spine, L1 to sacrum, (Model: 1300, SawbonesTM; Pacific Research Laboratories, Vashon, WA, USA), instrumented with four different techniques, were mechanically tested. We made 4 different constructs in 5 specimen samples for each construct. Groups: Group 1. Instrumentation of the L5-Iliac bones with TTS. Group 2. Instrumentation of the L4-L5-Iliac bones with TTS. Group 3. Instrumentation of L5-Iliac bones without TTS. Group 4: Instrumentation of L4-L5-Iliac bones without TTS. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: According to our results, it can be concluded that in SPD, better stability is obtained when proximal fixation is only up to L5, without including L4 (alternative hypothesis), the addition of transiliac-transsacral fixations is essential.

Lumbo-Pelvic Dissociation in a Patient With Complex Spinal Deformity: A Case Report.

Lumbopelvic dissociation is an extremely rare injury to the junction of the lumbar spine and sacrum seen in high-energy trauma, for which the operative treatment has not been established, especially in the setting of hardware infection. In this case report, we describe the case of a 37-year-old male who presented to the spine surgery team after undergoing six surgeries, all following a traumatic car accident ten years prior. The patient initially presented with symptomatic lumbar hyperlordosis that had progressively limited his ability to perform activities of daily living. He suffered from paraplegia and a sensory deficit at the T8 level and below but still maintained control over his bowel and bladder. The surgical team performed two operations: one to improve his quality of life by correcting the degree of lordosis he was suffering from due to a 76-degree sacral slope and the second to perform re-instrumentation after the patient suffered a traumatic injury three weeks after the initial operation that occurred after assisting with his own wheelchair transfers. His prior surgeries include operations for deformity correction as well as irrigation and debridement secondary to hardware infection and subsequent removal. He reported that following the hardware removal he had significant pain and was no longer able to easily sit and play with his child or reach countertops while in his wheelchair, severely impacting his quality of life. The surgical team performed two operations on this patient: the first to correct the lordotic deformity utilizing a four-rod construct, and a second performed three weeks later to perform re-instrumentation utilizing a five-rod construct and hematoma evacuation following hardware failure secondary to high biomechanical strain from performing his own wheelchair transfers.

Biomechanical models of in vitro constructs for spinopelvic osteosynthesis.

Spinopelvic lesions are the result of high-energy vertical trauma with axial skeletal overload where the spine impacts onto the sacrum, dissociating the lumbar spine from the pelvis. Therefore, lumbopelvic instrumentations are aimed to counteract these vertical forces, although various biomechanical aspects of the combinations of different constructs (with or without iliosacral screws) or the number of lumbar fixation levels (L5 or the combination of L5 with L4) are subject to controversy. The number of patients in each published series is too short, and the nature of the fixation is very different from one article to another, making comparison very difficult. In this paper the methodology for laboratory studies is discussed. The design of the test bench fixture, biomechanical testing protocol and data analysis are very important when inference to the clinical setting is desired.

Minimally Invasive Lumbopelvic Fixation for Unstable U-Type Sacral Fractures.

Multi-planar transverse, U-type, and vertical sacral fractures occur from high energy trauma or as pathologic fractures and often have associated neurologic and extremity injuries. Modern treatment algorithms fall into two broad categories: 1) percutaneous posterior pelvic fixation (iliosacral or transiliac-transsacral screws) or 2) lumbopelvic fixation. Posterior pelvic screw fixation is minimally invasive but typically requires restricted weight bearing until fracture union. In many cases, lumbopelvic fixation allows for a closed reduction and provides stability to allow full weight bearing immediately after surgery; however, this fixation is often removed in a second surgery after fracture healing. Lumbopelvic fixation was originally described as an open procedure, minimally invasive lumbopelvic fixation is a recent variation and has shown promising results with less morbidity. We present a case series of unstable U-type sacral fractures treated with minimally invasive lumbopelvic fixation with staged hardware removal to illustrate the advantages and complications associated with this new technique. Ten patients with U-type sacral fractures underwent minimally invasive lumbopelvic fixation from 2016 to 2019. Six patients underwent scheduled hardware removal an average of 3.5 (range 1.9-5.5) months after index surgery. Two patients did not undergo hardware removal due to short life expectancy and diagnosis of pathologic fractures. One patient was lost to follow-up. One patient had failed fracture reduction and went on to sacral malunion that required a late sacral extension osteotomy to restore her ability to stand upright. Final disposition of all nine patients with follow-up was normal standing upright posture and normal ambulation without assistive device. There were no late displacements on postoperative upright radiographs. Complex sacral fractures are a challenging injury that can be treated with percutaneous posterior pelvic or lumbopelvic fixation. Lumbopelvic fixation offers the advantages of closed reduction to restore pelvic incidence and immediate weight bearing but has greater surgical morbidity than percutaneous posterior pelvic fixation and often requires hardware removal. The morbidity of lumbopelvic fixation may be reduced with minimally invasive techniques. Minimally invasive lumbopelvic fixation is a treatment option to be considered for complex sacral fractures.

Operative management of complex lumbosacral dissociations in combat injuries.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: As war injury patterns have changed throughout Operations Iraqi and Enduring Freedom (OIF and OEF), a relative increase in the incidence of complex lumbosacral dissociation (LSD) injuries has been noted. Lumbosacral dissociation injuries are an anatomical separation of the spinal column from the pelvis, and represent a manifestation of severe, high-energy trauma. PURPOSE: This study aimed to assess the clinical outcomes of combat-related LSD injuries at a mean of 7 years following operative treatment. STUDY DESIGN: This is a retrospective review. PATIENT SAMPLE: We identified 20 patients with operatively managed LSDs. OUTCOME MEASURES: Time from injury to arrival in the United States, operative details, fixation methods, postoperative complications, time to retirement from military service, disability, and ambulatory status at latest follow-up. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of outcomes of all patients with operatively managed combat-related LSD from January 1, 2003 to December 31, 2011. RESULTS: Twenty patients met inclusion criteria and were treated as follows: posterior spinal fusion (12, 60%), sacroiliac screw fixation (7, 35%), and combined anterior-posterior fusion for associated L3 burst fracture (1, 5%). The mean age was 28.2±6.4 years old. The most common mechanism of injury was mounted improvised explosive device (IED, 55%). On average, 2.2 spinal regions were injured per patient. Neurologic dysfunction was present in 15 patients. Three patients underwent operative stabilization of their injuries before evacuation to the United States. Four patients had a postoperative wound infection and two patients underwent reoperation. Mean follow-up was 85.9 months (range: 39.7-140.8 months). At most recent follow-up, seventeen patients were no longer on active duty military service. Eight patients had persistent bowel dysfunction and nine patients had persistent bladder dysfunction. Fifteen patients reported chronic low back pain. Seventeen were ambulating and five had documentation of running following surgery. CONCLUSIONS: This is the largest series of operatively managed LSD in patients currently reported. Our series suggests that combat-related LSD injuries frequently result in persistent, long-term neurologic dysfunction, disability, and chronic pain. Operative management carries a high postoperative risk of infection. However, a select group of patients are highly functional at latest follow-up.