Assessing the Efficacy of Thoracic Erector Spinae Plane Block for Postoperative Analgesia in Lumbosacral Spine Surgery: A Prospective Quasi-experimental Study.

Background and aims Optimal postoperative care and analgesia are the key factors in the management of cases of lumbosacral spine surgery. The erector spinae plane (ESP) block is a recently evolving entity and has a dynamic role in postoperative pain management. However, its role in the management of pain in lumber spinal surgeries is still not clear, and the literature remains anecdotal. Therefore, we planned to study the efficacy of ultrasound-guided preoperative ESP block at the T12 level using levobupivacaine for perioperative analgesia in lumbosacral spine surgeries. Methods A total of 60 patients scheduled for elective or emergency lumbosacral spine surgery were divided into two groups - the GA group received standard general anesthesia (GA) and the GA+ESP group received standard general anesthesia along with ultra-sound guided ESP block at the T12 level with a bilateral injection of 20 ml 0.25% levobupivacaine. Perioperative analgesia was assessed by total intra-operative fentanyl dose and frequency, intra-operative hemodynamic parameters, post-operative numeric rating scale (NRS) scores, time of first systemic rescue analgesia, tramadol usage, mobilization day, and hospital stay duration.  Results Intraoperative fentanyl sparing was observed in 83% of the GA+ESP group compared to 33% in the GA group. Postoperative tramadol sparing was observed in 80% of the GA+ESP group compared to 26.7% of the GA group. Twenty-four-hour postoperative NRS scores >3/10 were observed in 20% of the GA+ ESP group compared to 73.3% of the GA group. Conclusion In this study, superior perioperative analgesia, opioid-sparing effect, and decreased requirement of postoperative rescue analgesia were observed with ESP block.

An Incidental Diagnosis of Conjoined Nerve Root After a Work-Related Back Injury: A Case Report.

Conjoined nerve roots (CNRs) are an uncommon condition often overlooked until surgery, posing significant intraoperative risks. This case report discusses a 21-year-old male diagnosed incidentally with a left lumbosacral CNR involving the fifth lumbar (L5) and first sacral (S1) spinal nerve roots following a work-related back injury, emphasizing the importance of preoperative imaging. Accurate early diagnosis of CNRs can prevent surgical complications and guide appropriate management, highlighting the need for careful preoperative planning and patient education.

Is Restoration of Sagittal Spinopelvic Parameters Necessary in Spinal Tuberculosis of Lumbar and Lumbosacral Spine? Conservative versus Operative Management.

BACKGROUND: The relationship of spinopelvic parameters with spondylolisthesis is widely explored. However, there is scarce evidence on correlation of tuberculosis of lumbar spine with respect to spinopelvic harmony. The current study aims to find the association between functional outcomes and spinopelvic parameters in lumbar spine tuberculosis treatment. METHODS: A total of 47 patients with active tuberculosis confined to lumbar spine were prospectively analyzed and divided into 2 groups according to mode of intervention. Group A included 26 operatively managed patients and group B had 21 conservatively managed cases. Functional parameters comprising Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) along with spinopelvic radiologic parameters (pelvic incidence [PI], pelvic tilt [PT], sacral slope [SS], lumbar lordosis [LL], PI-LL, sagittal vertical axis) in both groups were analyzed at 0 and 6 months of follow-up. RESULTS: Both the groups showed significant improvement from initial presentation to final follow-up in ODI (Group A: 85.4 ± 12.1-12.3 ± 3.2, P = 0.02; Group B: 82.5 ± 10.06-36.8 ± 11.9, P = 0.04) and VAS (Group A: 8.1 ± 1.2-1.4 ± 0.9, P = 0.02; Group B: 8.5 ± 0.09-3.5 ± 1.1, P = 0.02). Statistically significant (P < 0.05) difference was observed in both functional outcome parameters between the 2 groups at 2-month and 6-month follow-up, compared with nonsignificant difference (P > 0.05) at presentation. Better improvements of spinopelvic parameters of PT, SS, LL, PI-LL were observed in Group A and in both groups the difference of these parameters correlated with differences of functional outcome parameters, though PI showed no correlation. CONCLUSIONS: The spinopelvic parameters played significant role in functional outcome. There is better functional outcome when LL is adequately restored. Surgical correction offered betterment of spinopelvic parameters like PT, SS, an sagittal vertical axis, which in turn leads to improvement in functional outcome.

Morphological and morphometric analysis of the Sacral Hiatus using lumbosacral spine CT scans: clinical relevance in Caudal Epidural Analgesia.

BACKGROUND: To conduct a morphological and morphometric analysis of the sacral hiatus (SH) using lumbosacral spine CT scans and to evaluate its clinical relevance in caudal epidural analgesia (CEA). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study analyzed 77 lumbosacral spine CT scans from a diverse patient population. The shape of the SH was classified into common types: inverted U, inverted V, irregular, and bilobed. Morphometric measurements included the length, width, and depth at the apex of the SH. The apex level of the SH was also determined in relation to the sacral vertebrae, and statistical analysis was performed to identify any correlation between the apex level and the morphometric dimensions. RESULTS: The most frequent SH shape was inverted U (68.83%), followed by inverted V (20.77%), irregular (9%), and a single instance of a bilobed shape (1.29%). The apex of the SH was most commonly located at the level of the S4 vertebra (75.32%), followed by the S3 vertebra (20.77%), S5 in two (2.59) and S2 in one (1.29%). No significant correlation was found between the level of the apex and the length, width, or depth of the SH. These findings indicate a high degree of anatomical variability in the SH, independent of the apex level. CONCLUSIONS: The anatomical variability of the SH, as observed in this study, underscores the need for individualized assessment during CEA. The lack of correlation between the apex level and the morphometric dimensions of the SH highlights the importance of imaging modalities such as ultrasound or fluoroscopy to ensure precise localization and effective analgesia administration. These insights can improve clinical outcomes by enhancing the accuracy and safety of caudal epidural procedures.

Cyclic testing of standalone ALIF versus TLIF in lumbosacral spines of low bone mineral density: an ex vivo biomechanical study.

PURPOSE: Screwed anterior lumbar interbody fusion (SALIF) alleviates the need for supplemental posterior fixation leading to reduction of perioperative morbidity. Specifically, elderly and multimorbid patients would benefit from shorter operative time and faster recovery but tend to have low bone mineral density (BMD). The current study aimed to compare loosening, defined as increase of ROM and NZ, of SALIF versus transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) under cyclic loading in cadaveric spines with reduced BMD. METHODS: Twelve human spines (L4-S2; 6 male 6 female donors; age 70.6 ± 19.6; trabecular BMD of L5 84.2 ± 24.4 mgHA/cm3, range 51-119 mgHA/cm3) were assigned to two groups. SALIF or TLIF were instrumented at L5/S1. Range of motion (ROM) and neutral zone (NZ) were assessed before and after axial cyclic loading (0-1150 N, 2000 cycles, 0.5 Hz) in flexion-extension (Flex-Ext), lateral bending, (LB), axial rotation (AR). RESULTS: ROM of the SALIF specimens increased significantly in all loading directions (p ≤ 0.041), except for left AR (p = 0.053), whereas for TLIF it increased significantly in left LB (p = 0.033) and Flex (p = 0.015). NZ of SALIF showed increase in Flex-Ext and LB, whereas NZ of TLIF did not increase significantly in any motion direction. CONCLUSIONS: Axial compression loading caused loosening of SALIF in Flex-Ext and LB, but not TLIF at L5/S1 in low BMD specimens. Nevertheless, Post-cyclic ROM and NZ of SALIF is comparable to TLIF. This suggests that, neither construct is optimal for the use in patients with reduced BMD.

Morphological Design and Study of a 3D Printed Integrated Fusion Device Based on CT Measurement Data Assisted Anterior Lumbosacral Spine / Diseño Morfológico y Estudio de un Dispositivo de Fusión Integrado Impreso en 3D Basado en Datos de Medición de TC Asistida de Columna Lumbosacra Anterior

SUMMARY: To measure and study the anatomical morphological data of the lumbar 5 to sacral 1 intervertebral space with the aid of CT and design an anatomical anterior lumbosacral 3D printed integrated interbody fusion for the treatment of degenerative lumbosacral spine diseases. 100 adults (50 of each sex) who underwent CT examination of the lumbar spine in our hospital were selected, and their lumbar 5 to sacral 1 intervertebral space anatomical data were measured, including the anterior lumbar convexity angle, different sagittal and coronal heights, and the sagittal and coronal diameters of the superior and inferior endplates. The measured data were also statistically analyzed, and morphological design and study of the 3D printed integrated fusion device in the anterior lumbosacral spine was performed by applying computer software. When comparing the coronal and sagittal diameters of the superior and inferior endplates from lumbar 5 to sacral 1, the differences were statistically greater in men than in women (P0.001). When comparing the height at different positions in the median sagittal plane, both males and females showed an anterior high and posterior low pattern. In the coronal plane, both males and females showed the highest height in the middle position (P0.001). CT can measure the anatomical data of the lumbosacral spinal hiatus more accurately. The 3D-printed anterior integrated fusion device of the lumbosacral spine designed according to the analysis of the data results is more in line with the anatomical structure of the lumbosacral spine, fits well with the superior and inferior endplates, and effectively restores the height and anterior convexity angle of the lumbosacral space.

El objetivo de este trabajo fue medir y estudiar los datos morfológicos anatómicos del espacio intervertebral lumbar 5 a sacro 1 con la ayuda de TC y diseñar una fusión intersomática integrada anatómica lumbosacra anterior impresa en 3D para el tratamiento de enfermedades degenerativas de la columna lumbosacra. Se seleccionaron en nuestro hospital 100 adultos (50 de cada sexo) que se sometieron a un examen de TC de la columna lumbar y se midieron los datos anatómicos del espacio intervertebral lumbar 5 al sacro 1, incluyendo el ángulo de la convexidad lumbar anterior, diferentes alturas sagital y coronal, y los diámetros sagital y coronal de las placas terminales superior e inferior. Los datos medidos también se analizaron estadísticamente y se realizó el diseño morfológico y el estudio del dispositivo de fusión integrado impreso en 3D en la columna lumbosacra anterior mediante la aplicación de software informático. Al comparar los diámetros coronal y sagital de las placas terminales superior e inferior desde lumbar 5 hasta sacro 1, las diferencias fueron estadísticamente mayores en hombres que en mujeres (P 0,001). Al comparar la altura en diferentes posiciones en el plano mediano, tanto hombres como mujeres mostraron un patrón anterior alto y posterior bajo. En el plano coronal, tanto hombres como mujeres mostraron la altura más alta en la posición media (P0,001). La TC puede medir los datos anatómicos del hiato espinal lumbosacro con mayor precisión. El dispositivo de fusión anterior integrado impreso en 3D de la columna lumbosacra diseñado de acuerdo con el análisis de los resultados de los datos está más en línea con la estructura anatómica de la columna lumbosacra, se adapta bien a las placas terminales superior e inferior y restaura eficazmente la altura y la parte anterior del ángulo de convexidad del espacio lumbosacro.

Redundant nerve roots on magnetic resonance imaging can predict ongoing denervation in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis.

INTRODUCTION/AIMS: Redundant nerve roots (RNRs) are abnormally elongated and tortuous nerve roots that develop secondary to degenerative spinal stenosis. RNRs have been associated with poorer clinical outcomes after decompression surgery; however, studies on their clinical characteristics are limited. This study aimed to investigate the association between RNRs and denervation potentials, that is, abnormal spontaneous activity (ASA), on electromyography. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed data of patients who underwent an electrodiagnostic study of the lower extremities between January 2020 and March 2023. Of these, patients with lumbar central spinal stenosis, as seen on magnetic resonance imaging, were included. We analyzed clinical and imaging data, including presence of ASA, and compared them according to the presence of RNRs. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was employed to identify factors associated with development of ASA. RESULTS: Among the 2003 patients screened, 193 were included in the study. RNRs were associated with advanced age (p < .001), longer symptom duration (p = .009), smaller cross-sectional area of the dural sac at the stenotic level (p < .001), and higher frequency of ASA (p < .001). Higher probability of ASA was correlated with greater RNR severity (p < .001). In the multivariable logistic regression analysis, ASA occurrence was associated with smaller cross-sectional area, multiple stenotic sites, and severe-grade RNRs. DISCUSSION: The presence of RNRs, particularly severe-grade RNRs, was identified as a significant risk factor for the development of ASA on electromyography. This finding may aid physicians in estimating the prognosis of patients with central spinal stenosis.

Comparative Study Between Dexmedetomidine with Bupivacaine and Bupivacaine Alone in Erector Spinae Plane Block for Postoperative Pain Control of Posterior Lumbosacral Spine Fixation Surgeries: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Background: As posterior lumbosacral spine fixation surgeries are common spine procedures done nowadays due to different causes and mostly accompanied with moderate-to-severe postoperative pain, so should find effective postoperative analgesia for these patients. This study aimed to observe analgesic effect of dexmedetomidine combined with bupivacaine versus bupivacaine alone for erector spinae plane block ESPB for postoperative pain control of posterior lumbosacral spine fixation surgeries. Methods: Double-blind randomized controlled study including 90 patients who were randomly allocated into 3 groups (30 patients for each): Dexmedetomidine combined with bupivacaine (DB group), bupivacaine (B group), and saline (control) (S group). US-guided ESPB was performed preoperatively bilaterally in all patients of the 3 groups. All patients received intravenous patient-controlled postoperative analgesia with morphine and 1 gm intravenous paracetamol every 8 hours. Primary clinical outcomes were active (while mobilization) and passive (at rest) visual analog scale (VAS) pain score at first 24 hours measured every 2 hours, opioid consumption (number of PCA presses), and need for rescue analgesia. Other clinical outcomes included active and passive VAS pain score at second 24 hours, measured every 4 hours, opioid consumption, need for rescue analgesia, postoperative opioid side effects, and intraoperative dexmedetomidine side effects as bradycardia and hypotension. Results: Active and passive VAS pain scores, postoperative opioid consumption, need for rescue analgesia, and postoperative opioid side effects were significantly lower in DB group when compared to other groups (B and S groups). There were no additional intraoperative dexmedetomidine side effects as bradycardia and hypotension. The estimated effect-size r was -0.58 and Cohen's d was -1.46. Conclusion: Addition of dexmedetomidine to bupivacaine 0.25% in ESPB for postoperative pain control in patients of posterior lumbosacral spine fixation surgeries resulted in lower active and passive VAS pain scores, decreased postoperative opioid consumption, need for rescue analgesia and postoperative opioid side effects without additional intraoperative dexmedetomidine side effects. Clinicaltrialsgov Identifier: NCT05590234.

Computed Tomography Findings and Classification of Traumatic Lumbosacral Spine Injuries: Insights from the AOSpine Classification System.

Purpose: The main objective of this study was to provide a description and classification of lumbosacral spine injuries based on the new AOSpine classification system. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted on 75 patients with lumbosacral spine trauma who were admitted to Hue University of Medicine and Pharmacy Hospital in Hue, Vietnam, between April 2021 and July 2022. All patients underwent lumbosacral computed tomography, and each injured vertebra was classified according to the AOSpine classification system. The frequency and percentage of subtypes of lumbosacral spine trauma were determined. Results: The mean age of the patients was 50.6 ± 16.1 years, and the male-to-female ratio was 1.5:1. Falls and traffic accidents were found to be the main causes of injuries. Among the patients, 78.7% did not exhibit any neurological symptoms, while 1.3% experienced complete hemiplegia and 20% had incomplete hemiplegia. The most common fracture subtype was A3, accounting for 34.6% of cases. Conclusion: This study provides valuable insights into the demographics, associated injuries, and classification of traumatic lumbosacral spine injuries based on the new AOSpine classification system. The study found that falls and motor vehicle accidents were the main causes of these injuries, with a higher proportion of male patients. The majority of injuries were classified as type A fractures, while type C fractures were the least common. Sacral fractures were relatively infrequent and often associated with pelvic ring fractures. These findings contribute to our understanding of lumbosacral spine trauma and can aid in the development of more effective treatment protocols.

Anterior approach for a stab wound with penetrating rebar injury causing incomplete cauda equina syndrome in lumbosacral spine lesion: a case report and literature review.

PURPOSE: To report a unique case of incomplete CES following a rebar penetrating injury in perineal region with retro-pulsed fragment, which was treated with anterior approach and discuss suitable surgical approach. METHODS: Incomplete cauda equina syndrome caused by non-missile penetrating injury is extremely rare. A 26-year-old male patient presented incomplete cauda equina syndrome due to a penetrating rebar wound from his perineal region to the lumbosacral spine. Computed tomography demonstrated a bony fragment broken from S1 body compressing into the spinal canal. RESULTS: By anterior approach, we performed partial corpectomy of L5, decompression by retrieving the bony fragment and L5-S1 interbody fusion. The patient had a significant recovery, and no clinical complication was found after over 2-year follow-up. CONCLUSION: It is challenging to determine the optimal strategy of surgical treatment for penetrating spinal injuries with retained foreign bodies, here we suggest an anterior approach situation that has the advantage of being able to effectively perform decompression and prevent iatrogenic damages of thecal sac and nerve rootlets.

Percutaneous Computed Tomography-Guided Oxygen-Ozone (O2O3) Injection Therapy in Patients with Lower Back Pain-An Interventional Two-Year Follow-Up Study of 321 Patients.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the effect of oxygen-ozone therapy guided by percutaneous Computed Tomography (CT) compared to corticosteroids in individuals experiencing lower back pain (LBP) not attributed to underlying bone-related issues. METHODS: A total of 321 patients (192 males and 129 females, mean age: 51.5 ± 15.1 years) with LBP were assigned to three treatment groups: group A) oxygen-ozone only, group B) corticosteroids only, group C) oxygen-ozone and corticosteroids. Treatment was administered via CT-guided injections to the intervertebral disc (i.e., intradiscal location). Clinical improvement of pain and functionality was assessed via self-reported pain scales and magnetic resonance (MR) and CT imaging. RESULTS: At all follow-up times, the mean score of the numeric rating scale and the total global pain scale (GPS) of study groups receiving oxygen-ozone (groups A and C) were statistically significantly lower than the study group receiving corticosteroids only (group B), with p < 0.001. There was a statistically significant difference between groups A and C at 30 days for the numeric rating scale. CONCLUSIONS: The percutaneous application of oxygen-ozone in patients with LBP due to degeneration of the lumbosacral spine showed long-lasting significant pain reduction of up to two years post-treatment when compared to corticosteroids alone. Combination therapy of oxygen-ozone and corticosteroids can be useful as corticosteroids showed statistically significant improvement in LBP earlier than the oxygen-ozone-only treatment.

Outcomes of Hip Arthroscopy in the Setting of Concomitant Symptomatic Lumbosacral Spine Pathology: A Matched Control Study With Minimum 24-Month Follow-up.

BACKGROUND: The overlapping biomechanical relationship between the lumbosacral spine and pelvis poses unique challenges to patients with concomitant pathologies limiting spinopelvic range of motion. PURPOSE: To assess the influence of concomitant, symptomatic lumbosacral spine pathology on patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) after hip arthroscopy for the treatment of femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) and symptomatic labral tears. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: A retrospective query of prospectively collected data identified patients aged ≥18 years with a minimum 24-month follow-up who underwent hip arthroscopy by a single surgeon for the treatment of symptomatic labral tears secondary to FAI. Patients were stratified into cohorts based on the presence (hip-spine [HS]) or absence (matched control [MC]) of symptomatic lumbosacral spine pathology. Inclusion within the HS cohort required confirmation of lower back pain/symptoms on preoperative surveys plus a diagnosis of lumbosacral spine pathology verified by radiology reports and correlating clinical documentation. Patients with previous spine surgery were excluded. PROMs were compared between groups, along with rates of achieving minimal clinically important difference (MCID) thresholds, Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) thresholds, revision arthroscopy, and conversion to total hip arthroplasty (THA). RESULTS: A total of 70 patients with lumbosacral pathology were coarsened exact matched to 87 control patients without spinal pathology. The HS cohort had preoperative baseline scores that were significantly worse for nearly all PROMs. Follow-ups at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months displayed similar trends, with the HS cohort demonstrating significantly worse scores for most collected outcomes. However, at every time point, HS and MC patients exhibited similar magnitudes of improvement across all PROM and pain metrics. Furthermore, while significantly fewer HS patients achieved PASS for nearly all PROMs at 12- and 24-month follow-ups, MCID thresholds were reached at similar or greater rates across all PROMs relative to the MC cohort. Finally, there were no significant differences in rates of revision or THA between cohorts at maximum available follow-up. CONCLUSION: After hip arthroscopy to address labral tears in the setting of FAI, patients with symptomatic lumbosacral pathologies and no history of spine surgery were found to exhibit inferior pre- and postoperative PROMs but achieved statistically similar clinical benefit and rates of PROM improvement through 24-month follow-up compared with the MC cohort with isolated hip disease. These findings aid in providing a realistic recovery timeline and evidence that coexisting hip and spine disorders are not a contraindication for arthroscopic hip preservation surgery.

Evaluation of spinopelvic parameters in patients with lumbosacral transitional vertebra: a cross sectional and comparative study.

INTRODUCTION: Lumbosacral transitional vertebra (LSTV) is the most common congenital anomaly of the lumbosacral junction and is a frequent cause of back pain in young patients with a prevalence of 4.6% to 36% in different regions. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate spinopelvic parameters in patients with lumbosacral transitional vertebra and to compare them with the same parameters of low back ache patients without lumbosacral transitional vertebra. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional and comparative study conducted among low back ache patients presenting to our tertiary care center. Low back ache patients presenting to the outpatient department of AIIMS Jodhpur were screened for LSTV using radiographs. The spinopelvic parameters of those with LSTV were measured using Surgimap software and compared with the parameters of low back ache patients without LSTV. An Independent sample t-test was done and p-values were calculated. RESULTS: The spinopelvic parameters, pelvic incidence, pelvic tilt and lumbar lordosis differed significantly in the patients with LSTV. Pelvic incidence was higher in the group with LSTV (58.5+9.3) when compared to the group without LSTV (50+8.8) with a p-value (<0.001). Pelvic tilt was higher in the group with LSTV (19.4+8.8) when compared to the group without LSTV (13.6+7.8) with a p-value (0.001). Lumbar lordosis was significantly higher in the group with LSTV (57.6+13.2) when compared to the group without LSTV (50.7+12.2) with a p-value (0.007). No significant differences were obtained in sacral slope and Pelvic-incidence and lumbar lordosis mismatch. CONCLUSION: LSTV alters the spinopelvic parameters. Altered spinopelvic parameters predispose to spondylolisthesis, degenerative disc disease, and facet joint arthritis and are important in preoperative planning in spine and pelvic surgeries.

Incidence, Etiology, and Risk Factors Associated with Foot Drop.

Background: Injury to the neurological pathway that enables ankle dorsiflexion is likely to cause foot drop. This pathway includes the motor cortex; lumbosacral plexus; and the sciatic, tibial, and peroneal nerves. Nerve damage typically occurs due to compression, entrapment, traction, or direct trauma to the nerve due to several etiologies. However, there are limited reports on the incidence, etiology, and factors associated with foot drop. Methods: The authors reviewed their clinic's data from 1022 patients with foot drop from 2004 to present to determine the incidence, causes, and risk factors of foot drop. Microsoft Excel was used for descriptive statistical data analysis and graphing. Results: A total of 21 causes of foot drop were found. Of 1022 patients, 142 (13.9%) had foot drop after lumbosacral (LS) spine surgery, while 131 patients (12.8%) with LS spine complications who had not undergone surgery also reported foot drop. The LS spine complications and surgeries were influenced by age (median age, 63 and 55 years, respectively) and were marginally higher in male patients (54%). A total of 79 patients (7.8%) with foot drop had previously undergone hip replacement surgery. Older age (median age, 60 years) and female sex (85%) were risk factors for hip replacement surgery resulting in foot drop. In contrast, younger age and male sex were the risk factors for gunshot and stab wounds, injection drug use, drug or medication overdoses, and motor vehicle accidents resulting in foot drop. Conclusions: Failed back surgery syndrome is the leading cause of foot drop after lumbosacral spine and hip replacement surgeries in both male and female older (median age, 60 years) patients. However, most (85%) of the foot drop patients in the present study who underwent hip replacement surgery were female patients. Sports and recreational activities, motor vehicle accidents, drug use, and violence are common causes of foot drop in younger male adults.

Examination of Thoracic and Lumbosacral Spine Guide for Neurosurgery Residents.

Background: This paper outlines a summary of examination techniques for the thoracic and lumbosacral spine. It starts with observation, palpation and a range of movements followed by various special tests to identify thoracic and lumbosacral spine pathology. Methods: Bedside instruments used include a measuring tape, scoliometer and back range of motion instrument (BROM II). Discussion: Back flexion-extension, lateral flexion and rotation were assessed with bedside instruments. This would aid in increasing the accuracy and precision of objective measurement while conducting a clinical examination to determine the back range motion. Specific tests were used to localise specific anatomical locations and identify the spine pathology that can help the clinician to diagnose and treat the disease.

Anterior Traumatic Lumbosacral Dislocation: A Case Report.

Traumatic dislocation of the lumbosacral joint is a rare and severe lesion usually caused by high-energy trauma. The literature on traumatic spondylolisthesis is limited, and most published papers are sporadic case reports. By presenting the case of an anterior traumatic L5-S1 spondylolisthesis without neurological deficits caused by a 6-meter fall, we discuss the anatomopathological mechanism of this injury, clinical and radiological evaluation, and current management options. The patient was treated surgically with a combined posterior instrumented reduction and transforaminal interbody fusion. At the final follow-up after seven years, the radiological evaluation showed an unchanged spondylolisthesis reduction with reliable fusion healing. In addition, the patient had good functional results and resumed recreational activities and work. Traumatic lumbosacral spondylolisthesis requires a careful and well-documented initial clinical and radiological assessment. Most authors advocate surgical treatment as the mainstay of management. However, the long-term prognosis remains unclear and unpredictable.

[Analysis of preoperative risk factors of adjacent segment disease after transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion]. / Analiz predoperatsionnykh faktorov riska degenerativnogo zabolevaniya smezhnogo segmenta posle vypolneniya transforaminal'nogo poyasnichnogo spondilodeza.

Currently, there is no information on the combined effect of body mass index (BMI), age, gender, main spinal-pelvic parameters and parameters of adjacent functional spinal unit (FSU) degeneration according to magnetic resonance imaging on development of adjacent segment degenerative disease (ASDd). OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of preoperative biometric and instrumental parameters of adjacent FSU on the risk of ASDd after transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and determine personalized neurosurgical approach. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We retrospectively studied patients after single-level transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (group I, n=54), single-level transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and interspinous stabilization of adjacent level (group II, n=55), preventive rigid fusion of adjacent segment (group III, n=56). Preoperative parameters and long-term clinical outcomes were assessed. RESULTS: Paired correlation analysis established the main predictors of ASDd. Regression analysis determined absolute values of these predictors for each type of surgical intervention. CONCLUSION: Surgical intervention at the level of asymptomatic proximal adjacent segment is recommended as interspinous stabilization for moderate degenerative lesions, BMI <25 kg/m2, difference between pelvic index and lumbar lordosis 10.5-15°, segmental lordosis 6.5-10.5°. In case of severe degenerative lesions, BMI 25.1-31.1 kg/m2, significant deviations of spinal-pelvic parameters (segmental lordosis 5.5-10.5°, difference between pelvic index and lumbar lordosis 15.2-20°), preventive rigid stabilization is indicated.

Conjoined nerve root in a patient with lumbar disc herniation accompanied by a lumbosacral spine anomaly: a case report.

BACKGROUND: A nerve root anomaly, typified by a conjoined nerve root, is a rare finding. Conjoined nerve root anomalies are easily missed even in preoperative advanced imaging modalities, which can be potentially troublesome during and after surgery. In this report, we present a case of conjoined right L5-S1 nerve root in a patient with lumbar disc herniation, accompanied by spina bifida occulta, which was undiagnosed on preoperative imaging studies. CASE REPORT: A 55-year-old Asian (Japanese) woman presented with low back pain and right leg radiating pain due to lumbar disc herniation at the right L5/S1. Physical examination revealed a positive Lasègue sign and the range of the straight leg raising test was 20° on the right side. The right patellar tendon reflex was normal; however, the right ankle jerk reflex disappeared. Although no obvious hypoesthesia was noted, mild muscle weakness (4/5) was observed in the right leg on the manual muscle test. We planned the lumbar discectomy under a microscope. During surgery, the conjoined right L5-S1 nerve root, which was compressed by herniated nucleus pulposus, was encountered. Although it was very thick and less mobile, some pieces of herniated nucleus pulposus could be removed piece by piece from the axillary part. After sequential decompressive procedures, the tightness of the conjoined right L5-S1 nerve root decreased but its mobility did not improve much. The laterality of the thickness and exit angle of the conjoined right L5-S1 nerve root was retrospectively confirmed on T2 coronal magnetic resonance images and magnetic resonance neurography. Postoperatively, right leg pain was immediately alleviated and complete improvement of muscle weakness was achieved 1 week later (5/5). CONCLUSIONS: Magnetic resonance neurography is extremely useful for the accurate diagnosis of anomalous nerve roots because of clear visualization of the neural tissue. Discectomy under a microscope, which enables magnified three-dimensional observation of the surgical field, must provide a valid and safe procedure to achieve not only secure resection of herniated discs but also adequate exposure of anomalous nerve roots.

Incidence of sacroiliac joint pain after lumbosacral spine fusion: A systematic review.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the incidence of sacroiliac joint (SIJ) pain after lumbosacral spinal fusion. BACKGROUND: Persistent low back pain is a potential source of disability and poor outcomes following lumbar spine fusion. The SIJ has been described as a potential source. However, there is a paucity of data concerning its importance. METHODS: This is a PROSPERO registered systematic review. A systematic search of the English literature was performed in Medline, Embase and Cochrane Library databases. MeSH terms such as Lumbar vertebrae, Sacrum, Spinal Fusion, Pain, Sacrum, Ligaments, Sacroiliac Joint were utilized for the search. Key words such as "sacroiliac dysfunction.mp." and "sacroiliac complex.mp." were utilized for the search. Two independent reviewers reviewed articles to determine eligibility for final review and analysis. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used to appraise the quality of all nonrandomized observational studies. Inverse variance weighting with random effects was used to pool data. The GRADE approach, PRISMA workflow and checklists was performed. RESULTS: Twelve studies were included. All studies were observational and of moderate to low quality. The pooled incidence of sacroiliac joint pain was 15.8%. The pooled incidence of SIJ pain for patients without fusion extending to the sacrum was 15.8%. The pooled incidence of SIJ pain for patients with fusion extending to the sacrum was 32.9%. There was high heterogeneity. CONCLUSION: SIJ pain is a potential cause of persistent pain after lumbar spine surgery. The current literature of poor quality. Patients presenting with pain after lumbosacral spine fusion should be evaluated for SIJ related pain.

A Double-Blind, Randomized Controlled Pilot Trial to Assess the Analgesic Efficacy of Ultrasound-Guided Preemptive Caudal Morphine as an Adjunct to Bupivacaine for Lumbosacral Spine Surgeries in Adults.

Background The analgesic efficacy of preemptive administration of caudal morphine for spine surgeries in adults is not well studied. In a double-blinded, randomized controlled trial, safety and analgesic efficacy of preemptive, single-shot caudal morphine and bupivacaine was compared with caudal bupivacaine alone in lumbosacral spine surgeries. Methods After Institutional Ethics Committee approval, 40 patients aged 18-60 yrs planned for lumbosacral spine surgery were randomized to groups of 20 patients each. After induction and prone positioning, an ultrasound-guided caudal block was performed with morphine 50 µg/kg with 20 ml 0.25% bupivacaine in the study group (LM) and only bupivacaine in the control group (LA). Postoperatively, both groups received intravenous morphine via patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) pump (No basal, 1 mg/bolus, 10 minutes lockout interval). Intraoperative fentanyl use, postoperative 24-h morphine consumption, visual analogue pain scores (VAS) and adverse effects of morphine were noted. Results Demographics and baseline data were comparable. Postoperative 24-hour morphine requirement was more in LA group (34.3 ± 10.7 mg vs 19.65 ± 11.8 mg, p=0.0001). Total intraoperative supplemental fentanyl requirement was similar (79.25 ± 67.60 µg in LA vs 54 ± 50.20 µg in LM group, p=0.28). VAS scores at 2/4/6/12-hour in group-LM were significantly less than group-LA (p=0.005, 0.002, 0.001 and 0.047) but were comparable at 18 and 24 hours (p=0.25, 0.42). Postoperative incidence of adverse effects of morphine was comparable. Conclusions Ultrasound-guided, single-shot preemptive administration of caudal morphine with bupivacaine is a safe and effective modality of analgesia for patients undergoing lumbosacral spine surgeries.