RESUMO
Otomycosis is a chronic or subacute fungal infection of external ear accounting to 5 to 20% of external ear infection worldwide. Literature has suggested multiple local and environmental host factors associated with otomycosis, but their strength of association is not well established. We did this review to analyse otomycosis with respect to it's various common predisposing factors. Human studies reporting ototopical antibiotics with or without steroids as predisposing factors for otomycosis, or pooled data together with other predisposing factors were included. MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, the ISRCTN register, and Cochrane databases were searched for the data extraction. Critical appraisal was done using the standardized Joanna Briggs Institute's (JBI) Appraisal checklist. Random effects were used to calculate pooled estimate prevalence with 95% Confidence Intervals (CIs). Age varied in different studies with a mean age variation from 7 to 43.19. Most of the studies were conducted in tropical and sub-tropical countries. Aspergillus was the most common species isolated. The use of ototopical antibiotics with or without steroid drops [47% (95% CI, 0.38 - 0.56)] were found to be the commonest predisposing factor for otomycosis, followed by the use of a variety of oils and wax solvents [38% (95% CI,0.26 - 0.51)] and trauma to the External Auditory Canal (EAC) as a result of compulsive cleaning or instrumentation[37% (95% CI, 0.21 - 0.54)]. We suggest the need for caution and vigilance from clinicians treating patients with ototopical drops for ear infections and use of other alternative treatment like 2% acetic acid for mild cases whenever feasible.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: There is a critical gap in understanding the symptom experience and health outcomes of older adults with and without Alzheimer's Disease and related dementias (ADRD) and polypharmacy (PPY). The primary aim of the study was to compare the number of symptoms experienced over time in older adults with and without ADRD by polypharmacy status. The secondary aim was to examine the trajectory of physical function and health outcomes over time in each group. METHODS: This study utilized longitudinal data from the National Health and Aging Trends Study, a nationally representative sample of Medicare beneficiaries from 2016-2019. The sample was separated into four groups (N = 2,052): neither ADRD or PPY (n = 1,048), PPY only (n = 761), ADRD only (n = 116), and both ADRD and PPY(n = 127). RESULTS: The overall sample was predominately female (57.9%), White (70.9%), aged 84 or younger (75%), married (46%), and had some college or a college degree (50%). Participants with both ADRD and PPY experienced more symptoms on average, had higher odds of falls, hospitalizations, and mortality than all other groups. Older adults with both ADRD and PPY had lower physical function, needed more assistance with activities of daily living and higher assistive device utilization compared to the other three groups. CONCLUSIONS: Findings indicate that older adults with both ADRD and PPY experience more symptoms, negative health outcomes and physical function decline that can negatively impact their quality of life. Further research is needed to identify strategies for reducing PPY in people with ADRD.
RESUMO
The association between diabetes mellitus (DM) and masked hypertension (MH) in ambulatory blood pressure (BP) monitoring is established, but its relationship with home BP monitoring (HBPM) remains uncertain. This web-based database study compared BP phenotypes in individuals using (n = 51,194; 6.05% with DM) and not using (n = 55,320; 0.63% with DM) antihypertensive medications (AH) undergoing HBPM. Multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed similar MH and white-coat hypertension (WCH) prevalence in individuals with or without DM, irrespective of AH use. However, among AH non-users, DM was associated with a higher likelihood of normotension (OR 1.35, 95%CI 1.09-1.66; p = 0.006) and a lower likelihood of sustained hypertension (OR 0.77, 95%CI 0.60-0.99; p = 0.039) compared to individuals without DM. These findings suggest that while DM does not significantly impact MH and WCH in HBPM, it may influence normotension and sustained hypertension rates in AH non-users. Likelihood of diabetes mellitus according to blood pressure phenotypes. AH - antihypertensive medications; CH - controlled hypertension; MH - masked hypertension; MUCH - masked uncontrolled hypertension; NT - normotension; SH - sustained hypertension; SUCH - sustained uncontrolled hypertension; WCH - white-coat hypertension; WUCH - white-coat uncontrolled hypertension.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study is to investigate the use of buprenorphine within non-hospital residential programs. We hypothesize that programs offering long-term treatment will be less likely to accept or prescribe buprenorphine, but those that accept public insurance will demonstrate relative increased likelihood of buprenorphine availability. METHOD: This study analyzed data from the 2021 National Substance Use and Mental Health Services Survey. The analytic sample (n=3654) included a subset of facilities that reported providing only substance use treatment, including three non-mutually exclusive service types: detox, short-term, and long-term. A logistic regression examined the association between buprenorphine availability and residential service type, holding constant characteristics associated with the outcome of interest. We then tested an interaction between public insurance and long-term service type on the outcome of interest. RESULTS: While long-term service type was associated with reduced odds of buprenorphine availability (OR=.288, p <.05), programs that both offered long-term residential programs and accepted public health insurance had 3.5 higher odds of accepting or prescribing buprenorphine (OR=4.586, p<.01) compared to long-term programs without public insurance. IMPLICATIONS: Patients who require treatment of longer duration may face barriers to buprenorphine availability; however, public insurance acceptance may increase odds of availability of buprenorphine among long-term programs.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: This study aimed to identify and describe links between pain medication use and self-reported pain among people aged ≥ 50 years with osteoarthritis (OA) in an Irish population, and to examine the relationships between pain, medication usage and socioeconomic and clinical characteristics. METHODS: Secondary data analysis of wave 1 cross-sectional data from The Irish Longitudinal Study on Ageing (TILDA) was undertaken of 1042 people with self-reported doctor-diagnosed OA. We examined use of medications typically included in OA clinical guidelines, including non-opioid analgesics (e.g. paracetamol), topical and oral non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), opioids and nutraceuticals. Latent Class Analysis (LCA) was used to identify underlying clinical subgroups based on medication usage patterns, and self-reported pain severity. Multinomial logistic regression was used to explore sociodemographic and clinical characteristic links to latent class membership. RESULTS: A total of 358 (34.4%) of the 1042 people in this analysis were taking pain medications including oral NSAIDs (17.5%), analgesics (11.4%) and opioids (8.7%). Nutraceutical (glucosamine/chondroitin) use was reported by 8.6% and topical NSAID use reported by 1.4%. Three latent classes were identified: (1) Low medication use/no pain (n = 382, 37%), (2) low medication use/moderate pain (n = 523, 50%) and (3) moderate medication use/high pain (n = 137, 13%). Poorer self-rated health and greater sleep disturbance were associated with classes 2 and 3; depressive symptoms and female gender were associated with class 2, and retirement associated with class 3. CONCLUSIONS: Whilst pain medication use varied with pain severity, different medication types reported broadly aligned with OA guidelines. The two subgroups exhibiting higher pain levels demonstrated poorer self-rated health and greater sleep disturbance.
Assuntos
Análise de Classes Latentes , Osteoartrite , Autorrelato , Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Idoso , Estudos Longitudinais , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Irlanda/epidemiologia , Estudos Transversais , Osteoartrite/tratamento farmacológico , Osteoartrite/epidemiologia , Osteoartrite/diagnóstico , Analgésicos/uso terapêutico , Anti-Inflamatórios não Esteroides/uso terapêutico , Dor/tratamento farmacológico , Dor/epidemiologia , Medição da Dor , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapêutico , Idoso de 80 Anos ou maisRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD), including buprenorphine, are effective treatments for opioid use disorder (OUD) and reduce risk for overdose and death. Buprenorphine can be prescribed in outpatient primary care settings to treat OUD; however, prior research suggests adherence to buprenorphine in these settings can be low. The purpose of this study was to identify the rates of and factors associated with buprenorphine adherence among patients with OUD in the first six months after a new start of buprenorphine. METHODS: Data were extracted from the electronic health record (EHR) from a large integrated health system in the upper Midwest. Patients with OUD (N = 345; Mean age = 37.6 years, SD 13.2; 61.7% male; 78% White) with a new start of buprenorphine between March 2019 and July 2021 were included in the analysis. Buprenorphine adherence in the first six months was defined using medication orders; the proportion of days covered (PDC) with a standard cut-point of 80% was used to classify patients as adherent or non-adherent. Demographic (e.g., age, sex, race and ethnicity, geographic location), service (e.g., encounters, buprenorphine formulations and dosage) and clinical (e.g., diagnoses, urine toxicology screens) characteristics were examined as factors that could be related to adherence. Analyses included logistic regression with adherence group as a binary outcome. RESULTS: Less than half of patients were classified as adherent to buprenorphine (44%). Adjusting for other factors, male sex (OR = 0.34, 95% CI = 0.20, 0.57, p < .001) and having an unexpected positive for opioids on urine toxicology (OR = 0.42, 95% CI = 0.21, 0.83, p < .014) were associated with lower likelihood of adherence to buprenorphine, whereas being a former smoker (compared to a current smoker; OR = 1.82, 95% CI = 1.02, 3.27, p = .014) was associated with greater likelihood of being adherent to buprenorphine. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that buprenorphine adherence in primary care settings may be low, yet male sex and smoking status are associated with adherence rates. Future research is needed to identify the mechanisms through which these factors are associated with adherence.
Assuntos
Buprenorfina , Adesão à Medicação , Tratamento de Substituição de Opiáceos , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Opioides , Atenção Primária à Saúde , Humanos , Buprenorfina/uso terapêutico , Masculino , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Opioides/tratamento farmacológico , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Opioides/epidemiologia , Feminino , Atenção Primária à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Adesão à Medicação/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Tratamento de Substituição de Opiáceos/estatística & dados numéricos , Antagonistas de Entorpecentes/uso terapêuticoRESUMO
This article discusses the use of substances among adolescents, the unacceptable overdose death rates they bear, and the relevant evidence-based harm reduction strategies available in primary care, including medications for opioid use disorder. Access to these medications, as well as to harm reduction strategies generally, is insufficient for adolescents. Many adolescents who use substances and who are most at risk for overdose regularly visit primary care, which is an appropriate setting for treatment and harm reduction delivery.
Assuntos
Overdose de Drogas , Redução do Dano , Atenção Primária à Saúde , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Substâncias , Humanos , Adolescente , Atenção Primária à Saúde/organização & administração , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Substâncias/epidemiologia , Overdose de Drogas/prevenção & controle , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Opioides/epidemiologia , Comportamento do Adolescente , Antagonistas de Entorpecentes/uso terapêuticoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: As a result of the recent advancements in technology, the incorporation of digital interventions into the health care system has gained a lot of attention and adoption globally. However, these interventions have not been fully adopted, thereby limiting their impact on health care delivery in West Africa. OBJECTIVE: This review primarily aims at evaluating the current digital interventions for medication and health care delivery in West Africa. Its secondary aim is to assess the impacts of digital interventions in managing medication and health care service delivery with the intent of providing vital recommendations that would contribute to an excellent adoption of digital intervention tools in the health care space in West Africa. METHODS: In line with PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses), a comprehensive search through various databases yielded 529 results. After a rigorous screening, 29 articles that provided information on 3 broad digital health intervention tools were found eligible for this review. RESULTS: Out of 29 studies, 16 (55%) studies examined phone-based interventions, 9 (31%) studies focused on tele- and e-based interventions, and 4 (14%) studies evaluated digital interventions. These interventions were used for diverse purposes, some of which are monitoring adverse drug reactions, general health, sexual and reproductive health, and training of health care practitioners. The phone-based intervention appears to be the most known and impactful of all the interventions, followed by tele- and e-based, while digital interventions were scarcely used. CONCLUSIONS: Digital interventions have had a considerable level of impact on medication and health care delivery across West Africa. However, the overall impact is limited. Therefore, strategies must be developed to address the challenges limiting the use of digital intervention tools so that these tools can be fully incorporated into the health care space in West Africa.
Assuntos
Atenção à Saúde , Telemedicina , Humanos , África OcidentalRESUMO
BACKGROUND: e-Pharmacy can potentially solve problems related to the quality of services and products, cost, and access to medicines in low- and middle-income countries. This review aims to understand the facilitators and barriers to the implementation of e-pharmacy in India. OBJECTIVE: This scoping review aimed (1) to understand the facilitators and barriers to the use of e-pharmacy in India and (2) to estimate the potential for e-pharmacy in India for improving access to medication, improving the quality of services and medicines, and decreasing costs of medications. METHODS: All published and gray literature from July 1, 2011, to June 30, 2021, relating to e-pharmacy, was searched from MEDLINE, Scopus, ProQuest, and Google using a systematic search strategy. RESULTS: In total, 1464 titles and abstracts were screened, of which 47 full-texts were included in the review. e-Pharmacy can potentially improve access to medications for remote areas, and old and debilitated individuals. e-Pharmacies can enable lean supply chain management, lower cost, and allow easy tracking of dispensed medicines. There is potential for integration of e-pharmacy services into the national program of Bhartiya Jan Aushadhi Pariyojana. However, the country is not adequately regulated to prevent the growth of illicit e-pharmacies. Lack of global accreditation and internet coverage, digital literacy, and transnational access are other challenges. CONCLUSIONS: E-pharmacy has the potential to improve universal health coverage in India by improving access to medicines and lowering the overall cost of health care. However, future growth will need specific regulations and accreditation mechanisms. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Open Science Forum; https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/6R9YQ.
RESUMO
AIMS: The aim of this study was to assess cardiac event incidence and trends by sex and age in young patients on psychopharmacological treatment in Sweden. METHODS: This nationwide incidence study encompassed data from Swedish registers (2006-2018). Patients aged 5-30 years were exposed to one or more psychotropic medications (attention deficit hyperactivity disorder medications, antihistamines, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, other antidepressants, anxiolytics, antipsychotics, hypnotics/sedatives). Annual incidences, trends and mean incidences of cardiac events (cardiac arrest, arrhythmias, fainting/collapse, sudden death) and recurrent events were calculated. RESULTS: Among those exposed (n = 875 430, 2 647 957 patient-years, 55% female), 26 750 cardiac events were identified. The mean annual incidence of cardiac events and first-ever events were 0.99% and 0.80%, respectively, showing significant upward annual trends of 4.26% and 2.48%, respectively (P < .001). The highest incidences were among females aged 15-19 years (1.50%) and those exposed to polypharmacy (1.63%), anxiolytics (1.53%) or antihistamines (1.27%). The mean annual incidences of cardiac arrest and arrythmias, for both sexes, were 0.01% and 0.51%, respectively. Fainting/collapse accounted for about half of all events, occurring more often in females. The pattern of rising annual incidence remained after excluding fainting/collapse. In all, 21.1% of events were recurrent. Death, including sudden death, occurred in 13 patients. CONCLUSIONS: The mean annual incidence of cardiac events among young patients receiving psychopharmacological treatment was low, 0.99%, with an upward trend of 4.26% annually. Incidence was highest in adolescent females and patients exposed to polypharmacy. Our study highlights the need for more knowledge regarding the possible association between exposure to psychopharmacological treatment and cardiac events.
RESUMO
Kindling models are widely used animal models to study the pathobiology of epilepsy and epileptogenesis. These models exhibit distinctive features whereby sub-threshold stimuli instigate the initial induction of brief focal seizures. Over time, the severity and duration of these seizures progressively increase, leading to a fully epileptic state, which is marked by consistent development of generalized tonic-clonic seizures. Kindling involves focal stimulation via implanted depth electrodes or repeated administration of chemoconvulsants such as pentylenetetrazol. Comparative analysis of preclinical and clinical findings has confirmed a high predictive validity of fully kindled animals for testing novel antiseizure medications. Thus, kindling models remain an essential component of anticonvulsant drug development programs. This article provides a comprehensive guide to working protocols, testing of therapeutic drugs, outcome parameters, troubleshooting, and data analysis for various electrical and chemical kindling epileptogenesis models for new therapeutic development and optimization. The use of pharmacological agents or genetically modified mice in kindling experiments is valuable, offering insights into the impact of a specific target on various aspects of seizures, including thresholds, initiation, spread, termination, and the generation of a hyperexcitable network. These kindling epileptogenesis paradigms are helpful in identifying mechanisms and disease-modifying interventions for epilepsy. © 2024 The Author(s). Current Protocols published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. Basic Protocol 1: Hippocampal kindling Basic Protocol 2: Amygdala kindling Basic Protocol 3: Rapid hippocampal kindling Basic Protocol 4: Chemical kindling.
Assuntos
Anticonvulsivantes , Modelos Animais de Doenças , Epilepsia , Excitação Neurológica , Excitação Neurológica/efeitos dos fármacos , Animais , Epilepsia/tratamento farmacológico , Epilepsia/fisiopatologia , Epilepsia/induzido quimicamente , Anticonvulsivantes/farmacologia , Anticonvulsivantes/uso terapêutico , Camundongos , Desenvolvimento de Medicamentos/métodos , Pentilenotetrazol/farmacologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Antiseizure medications (ASMs) are crucial for managing epilepsy in children. However, a well-documented side effect of ASMs is their impact on bone health, often due to interference with vitamin D metabolism. This can lead to vitamin D deficiency in children with epilepsy. This study aimed to determine if a daily dose of 400 IU or 1000 IU would maintain adequate vitamin D levels in children with epilepsy. METHODS: A phase IV randomized controlled trial enrolled children aged 2-16 years with epilepsy and receiving antiseizure medications. Children were divided into two groups: the monotherapy group, which was defined as children on one antiseizure medication (ASM), and the polytherapy group, which was defined as children receiving two or more ASMs. Eligible children with levels above 75 nmol/L were randomized to receive a maintenance dose of either 400 IU/day or 1000 IU/day of cholecalciferol. Baseline and 6-month assessments included demographic data, anthropometric measurements, seizure type, medications, seizure control, and 25(OH)D level. RESULTS: Out of 163 children, 90 were on monotherapy and 25 on polytherapy. After 6 months of vitamin D maintenance, the proportion of children with 25(OH)D concentration below 75 nmol/L was 75.0% in the 400 IU group and 54.8% in the 1000 IU group. In the monotherapy group, baseline seizure-free children increased from 69% to 83.6% after treating vitamin D deficiency. CONCLUSION: Daily vitamin D supplementation with 1000 IU may be beneficial for children with epilepsy, particularly those receiving monotherapy, to maintain sufficiency and potentially improve seizure control.
RESUMO
The epidemic of opioid overdose brought a major health crisis to the front line of public health in the United States. Early efforts have focused on the prevention of production, distribution, and consumption of the drugs. However, there is little information about youth populations at risk for opioid overdose and their response to targeted treatment plans. The San Bernardino County Youth Opioid Response (SBCYOR) coalition in collaboration with the San Bernadino County (SBC) Probation Department organized a safety net system for at-risk youth by improving communication among county resources. This program mainly focused on individuals aged 12 to 24 years in the county's detention centers along with educational and prevention projects such as naloxone programs for first responders in the region. To describe the impact of the SBCYOR program on at-risk youth, we compare the frequencies of patients referred and treated with medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD) at the SBC Probation Department, which was responsible for individuals from age 12 to less than 18 years, with those from the West Valley Detention Center (WVDC), which was responsible for adults (18 to 24 years of age), from September 2020 through June 2022. Similar proportions of youths were referred for treatment of opioid use disorder (OUD) at the respective sites (3.7% SBC Probation Department, 3.6% WVDC). Of these, however, 78.0% were treated with MOUD at SBC Probation Department compared with only 7.1% at WVDC. SBCYOR coalition partners were able to transform their services into a comprehensive medical and behavioral health program for the incarcerated youth population at risk for OUD.
RESUMO
Background: Chronic migraine is a disabling condition, affecting 2-4% of adults globally. With the introduction of expensive calcitonin gene-related peptide monoclonal antibodies, it is timely to compare the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of preventive drugs for chronic migraine. Objective: To assess the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of medications used for chronic migraine through systematic reviews and economic modelling. Eligibility criteria: Randomised controlled trials of drug treatments for efficacy with > 100 participants with chronic migraine per arm; for adverse events > 100 participants with episodic or chronic migraine per arm. Previous economic analyses of preventive drugs for chronic migraine. Data sources: Eight databases. Reviews methods: Systematic reviews, network meta-analysis and economic modelling. Outcomes: Monthly headache days, monthly migraine days, headache-related quality of life, cost-effectiveness. Results: We found 51 individual articles, reporting 11 randomised controlled trials, testing 6 drugs (topiramate, Botox, eptinezumab, erenumab, fremanezumab, galcanezumab), versus placebo, on 7352 adults with chronic migraine. Calcitonin gene-related peptide monoclonal antibodies, Botox and topiramate reduced headache/migraine days by 2.0-2.5, just under two, or by less than 1.5 days per month, respectively. In the network meta-analysis, eptinezumab 300 mg and fremanezumab monthly ranked in first place in both monthly headache day and monthly migraine day analyses. The calcitonin gene-related peptide monoclonal antibodies were consistently the best choices for headache/migraine days and headache-related quality of life. Topiramate was very unlikely to be the best choice for headache/migraine days and headache-related quality of life when compared to calcitonin gene-related peptide monoclonal antibodies or Botox. We found no trials of the commonly used drugs, such as propranolol or amitriptyline, to include in the analysis. The adverse events review included 40 randomised controlled trials with 25,891 participants; 3 additional drugs, amitriptyline, atogepant and rimegepant, were included. There were very few serious adverse events - none of which were linked to the use of these medications. Adverse events were common. Most people using some calcitonin gene-related peptide monoclonal antibodies reported injection site issues; and people using topiramate or amitriptyline had nervous system or gastrointestinal issues. The cost-effectiveness review identified 16 studies evaluating chronic migraine medications in adults. The newer, injected drugs are more costly than the oral preventatives, but they were cost-effective. Our economic model showed that topiramate was the least costly option and had the fewest quality-adjusted life-year gains, whereas eptinezumab 300 mg was more costly but generated the most quality-adjusted life-year gains. The cost-effectiveness acceptability frontier showed that topiramate was the most cost-effective medication if the decision maker is willing to pay up to £50,000 per quality-adjusted life-year. Our consensus workshop brought together people with chronic migraine and headache experts. Consensus was reached on the top three recommendations for future research on medications to prevent chronic migraine: (1) calcitonin gene-related peptide monoclonal antibodies and Botox versus calcitonin gene-related peptide monoclonal antibodies, (2) candesartan versus placebo and (3) flunarizine versus placebo. Limitations: Topiramate was the only oral drug for which we were able to include data. We did not find sufficient quality evidence to support the use of other oral drugs. Conclusions: We did not find evidence that the calcitonin gene-related peptide monoclonal antibodies are more clinically and cost-effective when compared to topiramate or Botox. We identified directions for future research these drugs might take. Study registration: This study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42021265990, CRD42021265993 and CRD42021265995. Funding: This award was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme (NIHR award ref: NIHR132803) and is published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 28, No. 63. See the NIHR Funding and Awards website for further award information.
Chronic migraine is a disabling condition that can destroy work and family life. Treatments include cheap tablets (e.g. amitriptyline, propranolol and topiramate), Botox and expensive new drugs (the calcitonin gene-related peptide monoclonal antibodies). It is not known which of these drugs is the best choice. We wanted to find out which of these drugs works best. We wanted to know if they reduced the number of headache/migraine days and improved headache-related quality of life, how many side effects people experienced, and if they provided good value for the National Health Service. We first looked for research comparing these drugs to placebo (fake) drugs, and to each other. We then worked out which provide best value for money. Calcitonin gene-related peptide monoclonal antibodies reduced headache/migraine days by 2.02.5 days per month; Botox reduced headache/migraine days per month by around 1.9; and topiramate reduced headache/migraine days by 1.11.5 days per month. Many people taking topiramate or amitriptyline have nervous system and/or stomach/bowel side effects. Some people using calcitonin gene-related peptide monoclonal antibodies reported side effects associated with injections. Some calcitonin gene-related peptide monoclonal antibodies and Botox provide worthwhile benefits on headache-related quality of life. We were not able to identify any studies of sufficient quality to assess the effectiveness of other oral drugs. The best value drug was topiramate which gave better health outcomes at a lower cost than the placebos. After sharing the results with a panel of people with chronic migraine and headache experts, we identified a need for new studies comparing commonly used cheap oral drugs with placebo, Botox and calcitonin gene-related peptide monoclonal antibodies.
Assuntos
Anticorpos Monoclonais , Análise de Custo-Efetividade , Transtornos de Enxaqueca , Qualidade de Vida , Topiramato , Adulto , Humanos , Anticorpos Monoclonais/uso terapêutico , Anticorpos Monoclonais/economia , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados/uso terapêutico , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados/economia , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados/efeitos adversos , Toxinas Botulínicas Tipo A/uso terapêutico , Toxinas Botulínicas Tipo A/economia , Peptídeo Relacionado com Gene de Calcitonina/antagonistas & inibidores , Antagonistas do Receptor do Peptídeo Relacionado ao Gene de Calcitonina/uso terapêutico , Doença Crônica , Frutose/análogos & derivados , Frutose/uso terapêutico , Transtornos de Enxaqueca/tratamento farmacológico , Transtornos de Enxaqueca/prevenção & controle , Modelos Econômicos , Metanálise em Rede , Anos de Vida Ajustados por Qualidade de Vida , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Avaliação da Tecnologia Biomédica , Topiramato/uso terapêuticoRESUMO
Background The use of antihypertensive medications is common among older adults to manage hypertension and prevent cardiovascular events. However, the potential impact of these medications on bone health and the risk of fractures remains a concern. This study investigates the association between antihypertensive medication use and fracture risk in elderly individuals. Materials and methods A cross-sectional study was conducted from February 2023 to July 2024, including 299 elderly patients (aged ≥65) diagnosed with hypertension and currently using antihypertensive medications. Data were collected from medical records, focusing on demographics, fracture incidence, comorbid conditions, and medication use. Logistic regression models were used to analyze the association between antihypertensive use and fracture risk, adjusting for confounders. Results Among the participants, 110 reported falls, and 88 (29.43%) sustained fractures. Fractures were more prevalent among females (63.6%) and those aged 75-84 years (45.5%). A history of falls, mobility difficulties, osteoporosis, and urinary incontinence were significantly associated with fractures. While most antihypertensive classes did not show a significant association with fracture risk, diuretics were associated with a 2.3-fold increased risk of fractures (OR 2.30, p=0.037). Conclusions This study highlights the need for careful consideration of fracture risk in elderly patients using antihypertensive medications, particularly diuretics. Healthcare providers should balance the benefits of blood pressure control with the potential risk of fractures in this population.
RESUMO
Background: As prostaglandin medications, crucial in glaucoma treatment, become more widely used, their local adverse events are increasingly observed. Objectives: To evaluate the common adverse events of four clinically commonly used prostaglandin F (FP) receptor agonists in the treatment of glaucoma in the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database. Design: We screened and analyzed the generic and brand names of latanoprost, bimatoprost, travoprost, and tafluprost in the FAERS database and summarized and cleaned the baseline information of subjects receiving the above-mentioned drugs. Methods: Perform descriptive statistical analysis on the baseline information of subjects using the drugs. Conduct disproportionality analysis of drug-related adverse events. The criteria for positive signals of adverse events are established by simultaneously meeting the thresholds set by four methods: the ratio of reported odds, proportional reporting ratio, Bayesian confidence propagation neural network, and multi-item gamma Poisson shrinker. Additionally, assess the cumulative risk curves for drug-induced time of the aforementioned drugs and use one-way ANOVA to compare differences in drug-induced time across different groups. Results: The study included 1567 latanoprost, 1517 bimatoprost, 696 travoprost, and 82 tafluprost subjects. Adverse events mainly affected eye disorders, with significant issues in iris hyperpigmentation, ocular pemphigoid, corneal endothelial cell loss, periorbital fat atrophy, corneal irritation, eyelash growth, and ocular hyperemia. The time to onset varied among drugs, with latanoprost showing the longest (mean days = 344.37) and bimatoprost the shortest duration (mean days = 155.65; p < 0.001). Conclusion: Although signal detection analysis based on the FAERS database cannot establish a definitive causal relationship, our study found that FP receptor agonists used in glaucoma can cause various adverse events. Assessing their clinical suitability and potential side effects is crucial for providing personalized treatment and ensuring medication safety.
Understanding side effects of eye drops for glaucoma: a study using the FAERS database Why was the study done? Prostaglandin medications are crucial in treating glaucoma but can cause local adverse events. As the use of these medications increases, it's important to understand their common side effects. The Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) is a database that contains adverse event reports, medication error reports and product quality complaints resulting in adverse events that were submitted to the Food and Drug Administration. What did the researchers do? We analyzed the FAERS database to evaluate the common adverse events of four prostaglandin medications commonly used to treat glaucoma: latanoprost, bimatoprost, travoprost, and tafluprost. What did the researchers find? The study included 1567 latanoprost users, 1517 bimatoprost users, 696 travoprost users, and 82 tafluprost users. The main adverse events affected eye disorders, with significant issues including iris hyperpigmentation, ocular pemphigoid, corneal endothelial cell loss, periorbital fat atrophy, corneal irritation, eyelash growth, and ocular hyperemia. The time to onset varied among drugs, with latanoprost showing the longest and bimatoprost the shortest duration. What do the findings mean? Although signal detection analysis from the FAERS database cannot establish a definitive causal relationship, prostaglandin medications used in glaucoma treatment can cause various ocular adverse events during long-term use. Understanding these side effects is crucial for providing personalized treatment and ensuring medication safety.
RESUMO
Background: Multimorbidity, polypharmacy, and inappropriate prescribing are significant challenges in the geriatric population. Tools such as the Beers List, FORTA, and STOPP/START criteria have been developed to identify potentially inappropriate prescribing (PIP). STOPP/START criteria detect both potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) and potential prescribing omissions (PPOs). The latest, third version of STOPP/START criteria expands the tool, based on the growing literature. The study aimed to evaluate the prevalence of PIP and the number of PIP per person identified by STOPP/START version 3 and to compare it to the previous version. Methods: This retrospective, cross-sectional study enrolled one hundred geriatric patients with polypharmacy from two day-care centers for partially dependent people in Poland. Collected data included demographic and medical data. STOPP/START version 3 was used to identify potentially inappropriate prescribing, whereas the previous version served as a reference. Results: STOPP version 3 detected at least one PIM in 73% of the study group, a significantly higher result than that for version 2 (56%). STOPP version 3 identified more PIMs per person than the previous version. Similarly, START version 3 had a significantly higher prevalence of PPOs (74% vs. 57%) and a higher number of PPOs per person than the previous version. The newly formed STOPP criteria with high prevalence were those regarding NSAIDs, including aspirin in cardiovascular indications. Frequent PPOs regarding newly formed START criteria were the lack of osmotic laxatives for chronic constipation, the lack of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists, and SGLT-2 inhibitors in heart failure. Conclusions: This study showed the high effectiveness of the STOPP/START version 3 criteria in identifying potentially inappropriate prescribing, with a higher detection rate than version 2.
RESUMO
Background/Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the impact of a bundle of interventions on the error rates in preparing parenteral medications in a neonatal and pediatric intensive care unit (NICU/PICU). Methods: We conducted a prospective interventional study in a NICU/PICU in a tertiary university hospital as a follow-up to a prior study in the same setting. A clinical pharmacist and a pharmacy technician (PT) analyzed the workflow of drug preparation on the ward, identified high-alert medications, and defined a bundle of five interventions, which include the following: Drug Labeling: 1. EN ISO-DIVI labeling; Training: 2. Standardized preparation process on the ward; 3. eLearning Program; 4. Expert Consultations; and Location of Preparation: 5. Transfer of the preparation of high-alert medications and standardized preparations to the central pharmacy. After implementing the bundle of interventions, we observed the preparation process on the ward to evaluate if the implementation of the interventions had an impact on the quality of the drug preparation. Results: We observed 262 preparations in the NICU/PICU. Each single step of the preparation process was defined as an error opportunity. We defined seven error categories with an overall error opportunity of 1413. In total, we observed 11 errors (0.78%). The reduction in the overall error rate from 1.32% in the former study to 0.78% per preparation opportunity demonstrated that the implemented interventions were effective in enhancing medication safety. Conclusions: This study provides evidence that a bundle of interventions, including standardizing drug labeling, enhancing training, and centralizing the preparation of high-alert medications, can reduce medication errors in NICU/PICU settings.