Risk of subsequent Parkinson's disease among patients with bipolar disorder or major depression: A nationwide longitudinal study in Taiwan.

AIM: Bipolar disorder (BD) and major depression have been associated with an increased risk of developing Parkinson's disease (PD); however, few studies have directly compared the risk of PD development between patients with BD and major depression while considering relevant risk factors and psychotropic medications. METHODS: Using the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database, 21,186 patients with BD, 21,188 patients with major depression, and 42,374 controls were enrolled between 2001 and 2009, and followed until the end of 2011. Individuals who developed PD during the follow-up period were identified. Cox regression models were used to analyze the hazard ratio (HR) of developing PD, adjusting for demographic factors, comorbidities, and psychotropic medication usage. RESULTS: Both patients with BD [HR 8.63, 95% confidence interval (CI) 6.35-11.72] and those with major depression (HR 5.68, 95% CI 4.15-7.78) had an elevated risk of subsequent PD compared to the controls. Patients with BD were associated with a 51% increased risk of subsequent PD compared with patients with major depression. Long-term treatment with antiepileptic mood stabilizers was associated with increased PD risk among patients with late-onset BD and high Charlson comorbidity index scores. Lithium was not associated with an increased PD risk. CONCLUSIONS: The study highlights an elevated PD risk in patients with BD and major depression compared to the controls, with BD patients at highest risk. Further research is needed to elucidate the complex interplay between psychotropic medications and neurodegenerative processes in BD, aiming to optimize therapeutic strategies and improve patient outcomes.

Psychopathological and Therapeutic Trajectories of Inpatients Affected by Mixed States and Bipolar Spectrum Disorders.

In clinical practice, mental health professionals face diagnostic and therapeutic challenges daily. The diagnostic identification of mixed states allows the management of diagnostic and therapeutic trajectories appropriately. In our study, we evaluated 484 patients at a psychiatric rehabilitation center. The initial pre-admission diagnosis of the mixed state of 3.71% (at baseline) increased to 32.23%. The observation period was three years. The therapeutic efficacy of the pharmacological association of Antidepressants (Ads) or Second Generation Antipsychotics (SGAs) with a mood stabilizer (sodium valproate, lithium, lamotrigine, gabapentin, and pregabalin) was evaluated. An improvement in psychopathological symptoms was observed in different groups analyzed. The most significant differences were observed with the association SGAs + mood stabilizer [olanzapine + valproate sodium (p=0.005); risperidone + pregabalin (p=0.072)] and SSRIs + mood stabilizer [escitalopram + valproate sodium (p=0.005), vortioxetine + mood stabilizers (valproate or gabapentin). However, these are preliminary data and are under evaluation.

Predicting remission after acute phase pharmacotherapy in patients with bipolar I depression: A machine learning approach with cross-trial and cross-drug replication.

OBJECTIVES: Interpatient variability in bipolar I depression (BP-D) symptoms challenges the ability to predict pharmacotherapeutic outcomes. A machine learning workflow was developed to predict remission after 8 weeks of pharmacotherapy (total score of ≤8 on the Montgomery Åsberg Depression Rating Scale [MADRS]). METHODS: Supervised machine learning models were trained on data from BP-D patients treated with olanzapine (N = 168) and were externally validated on patients treated with olanzapine/fluoxetine combination (OFC; N = 131) and lamotrigine (LTG; N = 126). Top predictors were used to develop a prognosis rule informing how many symptoms should change and by how much within 4 weeks to increase the odds of achieving remission. RESULTS: An AUC of 0.76 (NIR:0.59; p = 0.17) was established to predict remission in olanzapine-treated subjects. These trained models achieved AUCs of 0.70 with OFC (NIR:0.52; p < 0.03) and 0.73 with LTG (NIR:0.52; p < 0.003), demonstrating external replication of prediction performance. Week-4 changes in four MADRS symptoms (reported sadness, reduced sleep, reduced appetite, and concentration difficulties) were top predictors of remission. Across all pharmacotherapies, three or more of these symptoms needed to improve by ≥2 points at Week-4 to have a 65% chance of achieving remission at 8 weeks (OR: 3.74, 95% CI: 2.45-5.76; p < 9.3E-11). CONCLUSION: Machine learning strategies achieved cross-trial and cross-drug replication in predicting remission after 8 weeks of pharmacotherapy for BP-D. Interpretable prognoses rules required only a limited number of depressive symptoms, providing a promising foundation for developing simple quantitative decision aids that may, in the future, serve as companions to clinical judgment at the point of care.

Dosing levels of antipsychotics and mood stabilizers in bipolar disorder: A Nationwide cohort study on relapse risk and treatment safety.

BACKGROUND: Finding effective treatment regimens for bipolar disorder is challenging, as many patients suffer from significant symptoms despite treatment. This study investigated the risk of relapse (psychiatric hospitalization) and treatment safety (non-psychiatric hospitalization) associated with different doses of antipsychotics and mood stabilizers in persons with bipolar disorder. METHODS: Individuals aged 15-65 with bipolar disorder were identified from Finnish national health registers in 1996-2018. Studied antipsychotics included olanzapine, risperidone, quetiapine, aripiprazole; mood stabilizers lithium, valproic acid, lamotrigine, and carbamazepine. Medication use was divided into three time-varying dose categories: low, standard, and high. The studied outcomes were risk of psychiatric hospitalization (relapse) and the risk of non-psychiatric hospitalization (treatment safety). Stratified Cox regression in within-individual design was used. RESULTS: The cohort included 60,045 individuals (mean age 41.7 years, SD 15.8; 56.4% female). Mean follow-up was 8.3 years (SD 5.8). Of antipsychotics, olanzapine and aripiprazole were associated with a decreased risk of relapse in low and standard doses, and risperidone in low dose. The lowest adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) was observed for standard dose aripiprazole (aHR 0.68, 95% CI 0.57-0.82). Quetiapine was not associated with a decreased risk of relapse at any dose. Mood stabilizers were associated with a decreased risk of relapse in low and standard doses; lowest aHR was observed for standard dose lithium (aHR 0.61, 95% CI 0.56-0.65). Apart from lithium, high doses of antipsychotics and mood stabilizers were associated with an increased risk of non-psychiatric hospitalization. Lithium was associated with a decreased risk of non-psychiatric hospitalization in low (aHR 0.88, 95% CI 0.84-0.93) and standard doses (aHR 0.81, 95% CI 0.74-0.88). CONCLUSIONS: Standard doses of lithium and aripiprazole were associated with the lowest risk of relapse, and standard dose of lithium with the lowest risk of non-psychiatric hospitalization. Quetiapine was not associated with decreased risk of relapse at any dose.

Effects of sleeve gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass on pharmacokinetics of lamotrigine and valproate: A cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Bariatric surgeries may affect the pharmacokinetics of medications through alterations of the gastrointestinal physiology. Pharmacokinetic changes of first-line antiseizure medications such as lamotrigine and valproate following bariatric treatment have received little research attention so far. METHODS: In our prospective case study we included lamotrigine- or valproate-treated patients undergoing bariatric surgery at hospitals in Central Norway. Lamotrigine and valproate concentrations were assessed using serial blood samples over a dose interval, before and one, six and twelve months following surgery. Primary outcomes included changes in area under the time-concentration curve (AUC) with secondary outcomes comprising full pharmacokinetic profiling. RESULTS: Six lamotrigine-treated obese patients undergoing Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) (n = 3) and sleeve gastrectomy (SG) (n = 3), as well as two valproate-treated patients (one undergoing RYGB and one SG) were included. Largest changes for dose-adjusted AUC values after surgery were seen in RYGB-treated patients on lamotrigine (average increases of 38 % one month and 32 % 12 months postoperatively). In the patients on valproate, AUC values were decreased by 22 % after 6 months and by 30 % after 12 months. The interindividual variation was high. Formal statistical testing was not done due to few cases. CONCLUSION: Postoperative pharmacokinetic changes for lamotrigine and valproate were modest, but for lamotrigine changes may be larger in patients undergoing RYGB than in those undergoing SG. Given the substantial interindividual variation, therapeutic drug monitoring should be used to capture pharmacokinetic changes and guide dose adjustments after bariatric surgery.

Hypomanic symptoms in major depressive disorder: Prognostic impact and treatment issues.

BACKGROUND: Mixed depression (MXD), defined as (hypo)manic symptoms occurring within major depressive episodes, is common in both bipolar and unipolar disorders, but its prognostic and treatment implications remain unclear. This study aimed to examine the relationship between hypomanic symptoms, treatment response and remission of suicidal thoughts. METHODS: We analyzed 1243 adults with major depressive disorder (MDD), recruited for a naturalistic study on treatment-resistant depression. Data were gathered cross-sectionally and retrospectively through structured interviews and clinical rating scales including the Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) and Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS); statistical analyses were performed using univariate and multivariate methods. RESULTS: Hypomanic symptoms were present in 651 patients (45 %), while 307 patients (25 %) responded to treatment. Both treatment responders (p < 0.0001) and those who achieved remission from suicide ideation (p = 0.0085) showed lower hypomanic (YMRS) scores. Multivariate analysis showed that hypomanic symptoms were negatively linked to treatment response (O.R. 0.71-0.87), while bipolar spectrum markers such as age at illness onset (O.R. 1.00-1.03) and MDD recurrence (O.R. 0.47-0.89) predicted remission from suicidal thoughts. Medications commonly used to treat bipolar disorder showed some benefits, with dopamine/serotonin antagonists improving suicide ideation (p < 0.0001) and mood stabilizers being associated with reduced hypomanic symptoms (p = 0.0003). LIMITATIONS: The study lacked prospective clinical assessments and treatment randomization. CONCLUSION: Hypomanic symptoms are common in unipolar depression; their assessment is essential to identify challenging-to-treat cases and select the best pharmacological options.

The Therapeutic Role of Lamotrigine in Borderline Personality Disorder: A Comprehensive Review of Outcomes, Mechanisms, and Treatment Strategies.

Borderline personality disorder (BPD) is a severe mental health condition characterized by pervasive instability in mood, self-image, and interpersonal relationships, significantly impacting individuals' personal, social, and occupational functioning. Current treatment strategies primarily include psychotherapy and pharmacotherapy, but there remains a need for more effective and targeted pharmacological options. This review examines the therapeutic role of lamotrigine in BPD, focusing on its efficacy, safety, mechanisms of action, and practical treatment strategies. A comprehensive review of the existing literature was conducted, including clinical trials, observational studies, and relevant pharmacological data. Key focus areas included lamotrigine's impact on BPD symptoms, pharmacological profile, and comparative effectiveness with other treatments. Lamotrigine has shown promise in managing BPD symptoms, particularly in stabilizing mood and reducing emotional dysregulation and impulsivity. Clinical trials suggest that lamotrigine can effectively address core symptoms of BPD, with a safety profile generally comparable to other treatments. The medication's mechanism of action, which involves modulation of glutamate release and mood stabilization, aligns with the therapeutic goals for BPD. Lamotrigine represents a potential adjunctive treatment for BPD, offering benefits in mood stabilization and symptom management. Integrating psychotherapy and other pharmacological options should be considered within a multimodal treatment approach. Further research is needed to better understand its long-term efficacy and safety and its role in combination therapy.

Self-prescription with psychotropic medications by healthcare professionals working at mental health institutions in Saudi Arabia.

BACKGROUND: Healthcare professionals who work in mental health institutions are more exposed to psychotropic medications than those in other healthcare institutions and are, therefore, more likely to self-prescribe. Self-prescription is a concerning phenomenon because of the potential for medication misuse, drug interaction, addiction, and other social, physical, and psychological consequences. This study investigated the prevalence of self-prescription of psychotropic medications and the most common self-prescribed psychotropic medications by healthcare professionals in mental health institutions in Saudi Arabia. It also aimed to determine the possible side effects and factors associated with self-prescription of psychotropic medications. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study using an electronic survey consisting of a researcher-designed checklist, targeting healthcare professionals in mental health institutions in Saudi Arabia. The independent variables were sex, nationality, occupation, place of residence, place of work, previous diagnosis of mental illness, marital, and living status. Data were analyzed, using SPSS, and frequency distribution and percentages were calculated. Chi-square test was employed to determine association between self-prescription and various independent variables. RESULTS: The final sample size was 588; 9.5% healthcare professionals working at mental health institutions in Saudi Arabia admitted to self-prescription with psychotropic medications. Almost half of those who admitted to self-prescription (48.2%) and about 1/4 (23.2%) self-prescribed selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and benzodiazepines, respectively. The most commonly reported side effects of self-prescription were gastrointestinal symptoms and drowsiness. The study also suggested that males were significantly more prone to self-prescribing than females (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: To our knowledge, this is the first study in Saudi Arabia to assess the self-prescription of psychotropic medications by healthcare professionals at mental health institutions. This study is important for decision-makers in their planning and updating of prescription policies. It is also equally important to spread awareness among healthcare professionals about the consequences of self-prescription.

Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis: Efficacy and Safety of Antipsychotics vs Antiepileptics or Lithium for Acute Mania in Children and Adolescents.

OBJECTIVE: To compare second-generation antipsychotics (SGAs) and mood stabilizers (MSs) in youth with a bipolar disorder type I (BD-I) manic/mixed episode. METHOD: A systematic PubMed/Embase/PsycInfo literature search until December 31, 2023, for randomized trials of SGAs or MSs in patients ≤18 years of age with BD-I manic/mixed episode was conducted. The study included a network meta-analysis comparing treatments regarding mania symptoms and mania response (co-primary outcomes), and secondary efficacy and tolerability outcomes. RESULTS: Eighteen studies (n = 2844, mean age = 11.74, female participants = 48.0%, mean study duration = 5.4 weeks) comparing 6 SGAs (aripiprazole, asenapine, olanzapine, quetiapine, risperidone, and ziprasidone) and 4 MSs (lithium, oxcarbazepine, topiramate, and valproate) were meta-analyzed. All 6 SGAs outperformed placebo in reducing manic symptomatology, including risperidone (standardized mean difference [SMD] = -1.18, 95% CI = -0.92, -1.45, Confidence in Network Meta-Analysis [CINeMA] = moderate confidence), olanzapine (SMD = -0.77, 95% CI = -0.36, -1.18, low confidence), aripiprazole (SMD = -0.67, 95% CI = -0.33, -1.01, moderate confidence), quetiapine (SMD = -0.60, 95% CI = -0.32, -0.87, high confidence), asenapine (SMD = -0.54, 95% CI = -0.19, -0.89, moderate confidence), and ziprasidone (SMD = -0.43, 95% CI = -0.17, 0.70, low confidence), whereas no mood stabilizer outperformed placebo. Concerning mania response, risperidone (Risk ratio [RR] = 2.58, 95% CI = 1.88, 3.54, low confidence), olanzapine (RR = 2.42, 95% CI = 1.33, 3.54, very low confidence), aripiprazole (RR = 2.05, 95% CI = 1.44, 2.92, low confidence), quetiapine (RR = 1.89, 95% CI = 1.45n 2.47, moderate confidence), asenapine (RR = 1.81, 95% CI = 1.28, 2.55, very low confidence) and lithium (RR = 1.35, 95% CI = 1.00, 1.83, p = .049, very low confidence) outperformed placebo, without superiority of other MSs vs placebo. Individually, risperidone was more efficacious in reducing manic symptomatology than all other comparators, except olanzapine and topiramate, yet with low/very low confidence, and was associated with increased prolactin and glucose. Pooled together, SGAs outperformed both placebo and MSs for mania symptom reduction (SMD = -0.68, 95% CI = -0.86, -0.51 and SMD = -0.61, 95% CI = -0.82, -0.40, moderate confidence), and mania response (RR = 1.85, 95% CI = 1.53, 2.24 and RR = 1.65, 95% CI = 1.33, 2.04, moderate confidence) without differences between MSs and placebo. There were no significant treatment-placebo differences for all-cause discontinuation, whereas lithium, ziprasidone, and oxcarbazepine were associated with more adverse event-related drop-outs than placebo. Most SGAs were associated with more sedation, weight gain, and metabolic issues vs placebo and MSs. CONCLUSION: SGAs were more efficacious than placebo and MSs in treating acute mania symptoms, however, their use must be carefully weighed against important side effects.

The Effect of Neuropsychiatric Drugs on the Oxidation-Reduction Balance in Therapy.

The effectiveness of available neuropsychiatric drugs in the era of an increasing number of patients is not sufficient, and the complexity of neuropsychiatric disease entities that are difficult to diagnose and therapeutically is increasing. Also, discoveries about the pathophysiology of neuropsychiatric diseases are promising, including those initiating a new round of innovations in the role of oxidative stress in the etiology of neuropsychiatric diseases. Oxidative stress is highly related to mental disorders, in the treatment of which the most frequently used are first- and second-generation antipsychotics, mood stabilizers, and antidepressants. Literature reports on the effect of neuropsychiatric drugs on oxidative stress are divergent. They are starting with those proving their protective effect and ending with those confirming disturbances in the oxidation-reduction balance. The presented publication reviews the state of knowledge on the role of oxidative stress in the most frequently used therapies for neuropsychiatric diseases using first- and second-generation antipsychotic drugs, i.e., haloperidol, clozapine, risperidone, olanzapine, quetiapine, or aripiprazole, mood stabilizers: lithium, carbamazepine, valproic acid, oxcarbazepine, and antidepressants: citalopram, sertraline, and venlafaxine, along with a brief pharmacological characteristic, preclinical and clinical studies effects.

Pharmacotherapeutic value of inflammatory and neurotrophic biomarkers in bipolar disorder: A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: The various pharmacological interventions, ranging from mood stabilizers and antipsychotics to antidepressants, reflect the diff/iculty of treating depressive/manic symptomatology of bipolar disorder (BD). Among a broad range of mechanisms implicated, immune dysregulation may contribute to the increased inflammation that influences the course of BD. Inflammatory, neurotrophic and oxidative stress factors may be identified as promising peripheral biomarkers in brain functioning, perhaps serving as predictors of an effective response to treatment for BD. The present systematic review aimed to examine the evidence supporting the pharmacotherapeutic value of inflammatory and neurotrophic biomarkers in BD. METHODS: PubMed, PsychINFO, Scopus and Web of Science were searched from inception to May 2024 by two independent reviewers. A total of 40 studies with 3371 patients with diagnosis and intervention of BD were selected. RESULTS: Inconsistencies in the effects of pharmacological treatments on the connection between the expected anti-inflammatory response and symptomatologic improvement were identified. Mood stabilizers (lithium), antipsychotics (quetiapine), antidepressants (ketamine) or their combination were described to increase both pro-inflammatory (TNFα, IL-6) and anti-inflammatory (IL-4, IL-8) factors. Other medications, such as memantine and dextromethorphan, autoimmune (infliximab) non-steroidal anti-inflammatory (aspirin, celecoxib) drugs, antidiabetics (pioglitazone), and even dietary supplementation (omega-3), or their combination, clearly decrease inflammatory factors (TNFα, IL-6, IL-1ß, C-reactive protein) and/or increase the neurotrophic factor BDNF in BD patients. CONCLUSION: Inflammation in BD requires further investigation to understand the underlying immunologic mechanism, to identify predictors of treatment response, and to make informed decisions about the use and development of more effective pharmacological interventions for BD.

Risk of adverse pregnancy, delivery and neonatal outcomes associated with bipolar disorder and prenatal use of mood stabilizers: A population-based cohort study.

Previous research examining bipolar-disorder (BD) and pregnancy/neonatal outcomes yielded mixed results, were mostly derived from Western countries and rarely delineated effect between disorder and mood-stabilizers. This population-based study identified women age 15-50 years who delivered first/singleton child in 2003-2018 in Hong Kong, utilizing territory-wide medical-record database of public healthcare services. Propensity-score weighted logistic-regression analyses adjusted for confounders were employed to examine risk of adverse pregnancy, delivery and neonatal outcomes associated with BD and mood-stabilizers (lithium, anticonvulsants and antipsychotics). Exploratory unadjusted-analyses were conducted to assess risk for congenital-malformations. Of 465,069 women, 302 had BD-diagnosis, including 168 redeemed ≥ 1 prescription of mood-stabilizers during pregnancy (treated-BD) and 134 gestationally-unexposed to mood-stabilizers (untreated-BD). BD was significantly-associated with increased risk of gestational-diabetes (adjusted-odds-ratio: 1.75 [95 % CI: 1.15-2.70]) and maternal somatic hospitalization ≤ 90 days post-discharge from index-delivery (2.12 [1.19-3.90]). In treatment status-stratified analyses, treated-BD women exhibited significantly-increased rate of gestational-diabetes (2.09 [1.21-3.70]) relative to controls (non-BD and gestationally-unexposed to mood-stabilizers). No significant association of BD or mood-stabilizers with other adverse outcomes was observed. Overall, our findings indicate that BD and mood-stabilizers are not associated with most adverse pregnancy, delivery and neonatal outcomes. Further research clarifying comparative safety of individual mood-stabilizing agents on pregnancy/neonatal outcomes is required.

Therapeutic Drug Monitoring in Psychiatry: Enhancing Treatment Precision and Patient Outcomes.

Psychiatric disorders often require pharmacological interventions to alleviate symptoms and improve quality of life. However, achieving an optimal therapeutic outcome is challenging due to several factors, including variability in the individual response, inter-individual differences in drug metabolism, and drug interactions in polytherapy. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM), by measuring drug concentrations in biological samples, represents a valuable tool to address these challenges, by tailoring medication regimens to each individual. This review analyzes the current landscape of TDM in psychiatric practice, highlighting its significance in optimizing drug dosages, minimizing adverse effects, and improving therapeutic efficacy. The metabolism of psychiatric medications (i.e., mood stabilizers, antipsychotics, antidepressants) often exhibits significant inter-patient variability. TDM can help address this variability by enhancing treatment personalization, facilitating early suboptimal- or toxic-level detection, and allowing for timely interventions to prevent treatment failure or adverse effects. Furthermore, this review briefly discusses technological advancements and analytical methods supporting the implementation of TDM in psychiatric settings. These innovations enable quick and cost-effective drug concentration measurements, fostering the widespread adoption of TDM as a routine practice in psychiatric care. In conclusion, the integration of TDM in psychiatry can improve treatment outcomes by individualizing medication regimens within the so-called precision medicine.

Mortality risk and mood stabilizers in bipolar disorder: a propensity-score-weighted population-based cohort study in 2002-2018.

AIMS: Accumulating studies have assessed mortality risk associated with mood-stabilizers, the mainstay treatment for bipolar disorder (BD). However, existing data were mostly restricted to suicide risk, focused on lithium and valproate and rarely adequately adjusted for potential confounders. This study aimed to assess comparative mortality risk with all, natural and unnatural causes between lithium, valproate and three frequently prescribed second-generation antipsychotics (SGA), with adjustment for important confounders. METHODS: This population-based cohort study identified 8137 patients with first-diagnosed BD, who had exposed to lithium (n = 1028), valproate (n = 3580), olanzapine (n = 797), quetiapine (n = 1975) or risperidone (n = 757) between 2002 and 2018. Data were retrieved from territory-wide medical-record database of public healthcare services in Hong Kong. Propensity-score (PS)-weighting method was applied to optimize control for potential confounders including pre-existing chronic physical diseases, substance/alcohol use disorders and other psychotropic medications. PS-weighted Cox proportional-hazards regression was conducted to assess risk of all-, natural- and unnatural-cause mortality related to each mood-stabilizer, compared to lithium. Three sets of sensitivity analyses were conducted by restricting to patients with (i) length of cumulative exposure to specified mood-stabilizer ≥90 days and its medication possession ratio (MPR) ≥90%, (ii) MPR of specified mood-stabilizer ≥80% and MPR of other studied mood-stabilizers <20% and (iii) monotherapy. RESULTS: Incidence rates of all-cause mortality per 1000 person-years were 5.9 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 4.5-7.6), 8.4 (7.4-9.5), 11.1 (8.3-14.9), 7.4 (6.0-9.2) and 12.0 (9.3-15.6) for lithium-, valproate-, olanzapine-, quetiapine- and risperidone-treated groups, respectively. BD patients treated with olanzapine (PS-weighted hazard ratio = 2.07 [95% CI: 1.33-3.22]) and risperidone (1.66 [1.08-2.55]) had significantly higher all-cause mortality rate than lithium-treated group. Olanzapine was associated with increased risk of natural-cause mortality (3.04 [1.54-6.00]) and risperidone was related to elevated risk of unnatural-cause mortality (3.33 [1.62-6.86]), relative to lithium. The association between olanzapine and increased natural-cause mortality rate was consistently affirmed in sensitivity analyses. Relationship between risperidone and elevated unnatural-cause mortality became non-significant in sensitivity analyses restricted to low MPR in other mood-stabilizers and monotherapy. Valproate- and lithium-treated groups did not show significant differences in all-, natural- or unnatural-cause mortality risk. CONCLUSION: Our data showed that olanzapine and risperidone were associated with higher mortality risk than lithium, and further supported the clinical guidelines recommending lithium as the first-line mood-stabilizer for BD. Future research is required to further clarify comparative mortality risk associated with individual SGA agents to facilitate risk-benefit evaluation of alternative mood-stabilizers to minimize avoidable premature mortality in BD.

Tic-Related Obsessive-Compulsive and Eating Disorders in Dandy-Walker Variant: A Case Report and Systematic Reappraisal of Psychiatric Profiles.

Dandy-Walker complex (DWC) consists of a continuum of brain malformations involving the posterior fossa, often leading to psychiatric manifestations during adulthood. We discussed the case of a young woman with Dandy-Walker variant (DWV) and a comorbid complex neuropsychiatric presentation, who was diagnosed with an eating disorder, obsessive-compulsive disorder, and a tic disorder. Afterwards, we conducted a Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020-compliant systematic review reappraising all evidence of psychiatric outcomes in adults with DWC. Overall, 34 studies were eligible for data extraction, comprising 36 patients. Psychiatric profiles were more common among young adult males, with DWC lesions, especially DWV subtype, being often discovered incidentally after admission to mental health inpatient facilities. Most patients were diagnosed with psychosis and bipolar disorder, often comorbid with cognitive impairment. Psychotropic polypharmacy was frequently prescribed, generally leading to complete recovery. Evidence from our case report and systematic review indicates the importance of monitoring long-term psychiatric sequelae among adult patients with DWC malformations.

Pharmacological management of gambling disorder: an update of the literature.

INTRODUCTION: Gambling disorder (GD) is a mental health condition characterized by persistent and problematic betting behavior. GD generates distress and impairment, and treatment options include psychological and pharmacological interventions. AREAS COVERED: This narrative review explores existing pharmacological treatments for GD. The following classes of medications were considered: opioid-receptor antagonists (e.g. naltrexone and nalmefene), serotonin reuptake inhibitors (e.g. fluvoxamine, paroxetine, sertraline, escitalopram, and citalopram), glutamatergic agents (e.g. N-acetylcysteine (NAC), acamprosate, and memantine), mood stabilizers (e.g. topiramate, carbamazepine, lithium), and other medications (e.g. modafinil, nefazodone, olanzapine, haloperidol, tolcapone, and bupropion). EXPERT OPINION: Due to the limitations of the studies reviewed, solid conclusions regarding the optimal choice of pharmacotherapy for individuals with GD are challenging to draw at this time. Despite some medications, such as naltrexone and nalmefene, showing promising results, efficacy has varied across studies. The review highlights current gaps/limitations, including small sample sizes, limited diversity in participant demographics, the need for exploring different gambling subtypes and treatment responses, high placebo response rates, lack of longer-term longitudinal information, limited investigation of neurobiological correlates and co-occurring disorders, and the importance of implementation research. Further research is needed to address these gaps and explore additional medications, as well as interventions like neuromodulation.

Update on the use and management of lithium in neuropsychiatry / Actualización en el uso y el manejo del litio en neuropsiquiatría.

Lithium is an alkaline metal, used for more than 60 years in psychiatry, and currently considered the gold standard in the treatment of bipolar disorder (BD). According to recent evidence, this active ingredient is useful for the treatment of a wide spectrum of clinical varieties of affective disorders. In addition, it is estimated that lithium reduces the risk of suicide and suicidal behavior in people with mood disorders. On the other hand, some novel studies have shown that the cation has a potential efficacy for the treatment of other neuropsychiatric processes, such as the likelihood of reducing the risk of dementia and slowing down the development of neurodegenerative diseases. Despite the enormous evidence in favor of the use of lithium, it is known that, in Argentina, medications containing it are prescribed less than expected. In view of all this, the Asociación Argentina de Psiquiatría Biológica (Argentine Association of Biological Psychiatry) (AAPB or AABP) convened a group of experts to review the available scientific literature and prepare an updated document on the management and use of lithium in neuropsychiatry. In addition to the use of the ion in daily clinical practice, the scope of this review includes other contents that have been considered of interest for the psychiatrist, such as certain pharmacological and pharmacogenetic aspects, possible clinical predictors of response to treatment with lithium, management of ion during perinatal period, management of lithium in child and adolescent population, management of adverse effects linked to cation and interactions with drugs and other substances.

El litio es un metal alcalino, usado hace más de 60 años en psiquiatría, y actualmente es considerado el estándar de oro en el tratamiento del trastorno bipolar (TB). De acuerdo con la evidencia reciente, este principio activo es útil para el tratamiento de un amplio espectro de variedades clínicas de los trastornos afectivos. Además, se estima que desde hace tiempo el litio reduce el riesgo de suicidio y de comportamiento suicida en personas con trastornos del estado de ánimo. Por otro lado, algunos estudios novedosos han demostrado que el catión posee una potencial eficacia para el tratamiento de otros procesos neuropsiquiátricos, tales como la probabilidad de disminuir el riesgo de demencia y la de ralentizar el desarrollo de enfermedades neurodegenerativas. A pesar de la enorme evidencia a favor de la utilización del litio, se sabe que, en la Argentina, las especialidades medicinales que lo contienen se prescriben menos de lo esperado. En virtud de todo lo mencionado, la Asociación Argentina de Psiquiatría Biológica (AAPB) convocó a un grupo de expertos para revisar la literatura científica disponible y elaborar un documento actualizado sobre el manejo y el uso del litio en neuropsiquiatría. Además de la utilización del ion en la práctica clínica diaria, el alcance de esta revisión incluye otros contenidos que se han considerado de interés para el médico psiquiatra, tales como ciertos aspectos farmacológicos y farmacogenéticos, posibles predictores clínicos de la respuesta al tratamiento con litio, el manejo del ion durante el período perinatal, el manejo de litio en la población infantojuvenil, el manejo de los efectos adversos vinculados con el catión y las interacciones con medicamentos y otras sustancias.

A systematic review and network meta-analysis on comparative efficacy, acceptability, and safety of treatments in acute bipolar mania in youths.

BACKGROUND: The evidence of treatment options' efficacy on acute bipolar manic episodes is relatively less in youths than adults. We aimed to compare and rank the drug's efficacy, acceptability, tolerability, and safety for acute mania in children and adolescents. METHOD: We systematically reviewed the double-blinded, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing drugs or placebo for acute manic episodes of bipolar disorder in children and adolescents using PRISMA guidelines. We searched PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, EBSCO, Scopus, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and https://clinicaltrials.gov from inception until November 20, 2022. Response to treatment was the primary outcome, and random-effects network meta-analyses were conducted (PROSPERO 2022: CRD42022367455). RESULTS: Of 10,134 citations, we included 15 RCTs, including 2372 patients (47 % female), 15 psychotropic drugs, and the placebo. Risperidone 0.5-2.5 mg/day, aripiprazole 30 mg/day olanzapine, quetiapine 400 mg/day, quetiapine 600 mg/day, asenapine 5 mg/day, asenapine 10 mg, ziprasidone, and aripiprazole 10 mg were found to be effective (in comparison with placebo) in children and adolescents, respectively (τ2 = 0.0072, I2 = 10.2 %). The tolerability of aripiprazole 30 mg/day was lower than risperidone 0.5-2.5 mg/day and olanzapine. Oxcarbazepine had the highest discontinuation due to the adverse effects risk ratio. LIMITATIONS: Efficacy ranking of the treatments could be performed by evaluating relatively few RCT results, and only monotherapies were considered. CONCLUSIONS: Efficacy, acceptability, tolerability, and safety are changing with the doses of antipsychotics for children and adolescents with acute bipolar manic episodes. Drug selection and optimum dosage should be carefully adjusted in children and adolescents.

Association of BDNF risk variant and dorsolateral cortical thickness with long-term treatment response to valproate in type I bipolar disorder: An exploratory study.

Valproate is among the most prescribed drugs for bipolar disorder; however, 87% of patients do not report full long-term treatment response (LTTR) to this medication. One of valproate's suggested mechanisms of action involves the brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), expressed in the brain areas regulating emotions, such as the prefrontal cortex. Nonetheless, data about the role of BDNF in LTTR and its implications in the structure of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC) is scarce. We explore the association of BDNF variants and dorsolateral cortical thickness (CT) with LTTR to valproate in bipolar disorder type I (BDI). Twenty-eight BDI patients were genotyped for BDNF polymorphisms rs1519480, rs6265, and rs7124442, and T1-weighted 3D brain scans were acquired. LTTR to valproate was evaluated with Alda's scale. A logistic regression analysis was conducted to evaluate LTTR according to BDNF genotypes and CT. We evaluated CT differences by genotypes with analysis of covariance. LTTR was associated with BDNF rs1519480 and right dlPFC thickness. Insufficient responders with the CC genotype had thicker right dlPFC than TC and TT genotypes. Full responders reported thicker right dlPFC in TC and TT genotypes. In conclusion, different patterns of CT related to BDNF genotypes were identified, suggesting a potential biomarker of LTTR to valproate in our population.