Near-Peer Coaching to Enhance Operative Learning: An Educational Innovation for Surgical Training.

Objective: To design, implement, and evaluate a near-peer coaching model to enhance operative learning in general surgery training. Background: There is an urgent need to maximize operative learning in surgical education. Trainees find barriers to operative learning difficult to navigate and often sacrifice educational opportunities for the sake of impression management. Methods: A prospective cohort study was conducted over a 6-month period following design and implementation of a trainee-led near-peer coaching model; "SPICE" (Set goals, Plan, Imagine, Comment and feedback, Evaluate and reflect). Semistructured interviews were conducted to explore trainees' experiences of the model. Results: Twelve trainees participated in the study. The near-peer coaching encounters provided trainees with the psychological safety to be honest about learning needs, validated insecurities, and mitigated the pressures associated with impression management that consistently shaped consultant-trainee relationships. Trainees described improved operative performance, increased self-confidence, and a greater ability to adapt to the unexpected. Trainees adapted the use of the SPICE model to conventional consultant-trainee dynamics, which facilitated learning conversations and negotiation of operative opportunities. On a broader scale, trainees noticed an improvement in the teaching culture of the unit, describing that the use of the model legitimized the importance of perioperative learning conversations and increased consultant enthusiasm for teaching. Conclusions: Near-peer coaching created a unique psychological safety that facilitated authentic reflection and goal setting and improved trainee confidence. The benefits of the SPICE model were translated to other contexts and facilitated entrustment in conventional consultant-trainee relationships.

Improving Hands-On Suture Opportunities for Medical Students: A Collaborative Initiative Between Medical Students and a Simulation Lab.

Technical skills are an integral part of the practice of medicine. Simulation-based education (SBE) is a widely employed approach that allows students to acquire these skills prior to practicing them in the clinical setting. To discuss the state of SBE and potential avenues to improving education and medical student experiences, this editorial will explore the lived experiences of junior medical students, the observations of a research graduate student's informal conversations, and an educational quality improvement (EQI) pilot conducted by students at a satellite medical campus. Pre-clerkship Canadian medical students reported having limited opportunities to practice their technical skills. For some, these SBE sessions came at inopportune times in their academic journey, preventing them from maximizing their chances at real-world exposure. Having identified this as an issue, students sought ways to allow themselves and their peers to practice technical skills outside of the undergraduate medical curriculum, such as organizing peer and near-peer-led suturing events. Still, students feel these sessions are a start but do not adequately meet their needs, as access to practice materials is still restricted to the sparse events held by students, and experienced feedback is scant. To address these needs, we explore how simulation technology research and development labs can support peer-assisted learning by training students to teach technical skills and provide feedback to their peers. We also propose increasing access to simulation materials asynchronously to allow for practice when the students can benefit most.

Near-Peer Tutoring for Surgical Examination Preparation for Final Year Exam Readiness (Project SEPFYR).

BACKGROUND: Traditional surgical education often lacks targeted preparation for the interactive components of examinations, such as viva voce and objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) assessments. We present our approach and explore the efficacy of a near-peer tutoring program aimed at enhancing final-year students' readiness for such assessments. METHODS: Project SEPFYR (surgical exam prep for final year exam readiness) was conducted within a near-peer tutoring framework and comprised interactive discussions of selected case scenarios focusing on viva voce techniques and OSCE responses. Pre- and postprogram anonymized web-based surveys were employed to assess perceived self-efficacy among participants, while the Stanford Faculty Development Program-26 (SFDP-26) tool was used to evaluate the performance of tutors. RESULTS: Near-peer tutoring intervention resulted in improvements in perceived self-efficacy scores among final-year students. Additionally, tutors demonstrated high-quality facilitation skills as evaluated by the SFDP-26. CONCLUSIONS: Near-peer tutoring is a promising approach to enhance surgical examination readiness, particularly in addressing interactive assessment components. This model fosters a supportive learning environment while leveraging the expertise and relatability of near-peer tutors.

A case-controlled trial evaluating the summative performance of the 3-D skills Model.

BACKGROUND: Near-peer teaching is a popular pedagogical teaching tool however many existing models fail to demonstrate benefits in summative OSCE performance. The 3-step deconstructed (3-D)skills near-peer model was recently piloted in undergraduate medicine showing short term improvement in formative OSCE performance utilising social constructivist educational principles. This study aims to assess if 3-D skills model teaching affects summative OSCE grades. METHODS: Seventy-nine third year medical students attended a formative OSCE event at the University of Glasgow receiving an additional 3-minutes per station of either 3-D skills teaching or time-equivalent unguided practice. Students' summative OSCE results were compared against the year cohort to establish whether there was any difference in time delayed summative OSCE performance. RESULTS: 3-D skills and unguided practice cohorts had comparable demographical data and baseline formative OSCE performance. Both the 3-D skill cohort and unguided practice cohort achieved significantly higher median station pass rates at summative OSCEs than the rest of the year. This correlated to one additional station pass in the 3-D skills cohort, which would increase median grade banding from B to A. The improvement in the unguided practice cohort did not achieve educational significance. CONCLUSION: Incorporating the 3-D skills model into a formative OSCE is associated with significantly improved performance at summative OSCEs. This expands on the conflicting literature for formative OSCE sessions which have shown mixed translation to summative performance and suggests merit in institutional investment to improve clinical examination skills.

Tutors' perspective on the impact of their anatomy tutoring experience and ethics of body donation.

PURPOSE: To explore the future of former anatomy tutors, their perception of the impact that the anatomy near-peer teaching (NPT) program have had on them, in terms of academic performance, professional development, personal growth, long-term anatomical knowledge, and views on body donor ethics. Additionally, we compared their academic performance with non-tutor peers in terms of ranking at the National Qualifying Examination (NQE). METHODS: A voluntary survey was emailed to all anatomy tutors from 2005 to 2024, using an online Google Forms questionnaire including closed and open-ended questions across four themes. Quantitative data were analyzed descriptively, while qualitative responses underwent thematic analysis. A Wilcoxon signed-rank test was performed to compare former tutors' NQE rankings to their peers. RESULTS: Forty-seven out of 48 tutors responded. Tutors reported a positive program impact, including improvements in technical skills (100%), teamwork (97.9%), communication (89.4%), and organizational skills (76.6%), and good long-term anatomical knowledge retention (85.7%). Dissection on body donors was deemed essential for anatomy learning while shaping professional and ethical values. Of the 36 residents/specialists, 38.9% ranked in the top 10% at the NQE, with a statistically significant higher rank than their peers (p = 0.0011), and 100% obtained their desired specialty. CONCLUSION: This results suggest that the anatomy NPT program significantly enhanced tutors' academic performance, technical skills, personal and professional development, and was useful to foster a positive perception of dissection on body donors and reinforced the importance of anatomical knowledge in clinical practice.

Designing near-peer mentoring for work integrated learning outcomes: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Work-integrated learning (WIL) is a core aspect of allied health education. WIL placements typically focus on developing clinical skills, with broader conceptions of work readiness a secondary consideration. Near-peer mentoring (NPM), where senior students mentor junior students, is one WIL placement model that holds promise for developing students' work readiness, along with additional benefits for educators and service users. While there is emerging evidence of the benefits of NPM in allied health, a more comprehensive understanding of the design and outcomes of NPM WIL placements for allied health students, their educators and service users is needed. METHODS: A systematic search of seven electronic databases (CINAHL, ERIC, ProQuest Education, Medline, PsychInfo, EMBASE and Scopus) from 2003 to 2022 was conducted with 4195 records reviewed. Included studies reported on near-peer mentoring between at least one of the identified 11 allied health professionals providing services to real people (i.e. not simulation). Data extracted included pedagogical approaches, type of service model and relationship of peers to each other and educator, objectives for implementing the NPM, and effects for students. Quality appraisal was undertaken using the Standards for Reporting of Qualitative Research (SRQR). RESULTS: Fourteen studies met the inclusion criteria. The majority were North American in origin, from the disciplines of pharmacy, physiotherapy, psychology and occupational therapy, and used a range of research designs. Four types of placement design were observed from incidental co-location of students and observing outcomes through to deliberate preparation of students and/or educators for their roles in a NPM placement. Outcomes for junior students included lowered anxiety leading to increased confidence and motivation to learn and thus enhanced clinical skills. Senior student outcomes included development of educator skills, increased confidence, and enhanced professional reasoning. Service users and educators also benefited from NPM; however, evidence was sparse in these areas. CONCLUSION: The evidence supports near-peer mentoring as a valuable WIL model to support work readiness, and several general pedagogical designs are evident. Future research should design NPM WIL with a greater integration of educational theory and evaluate outcomes beyond satisfaction and self-reported experiences.

To teach is to learn twice, revisited: a qualitative study of how residents learn through teaching in clinical environments.

BACKGROUND: Teaching helps the teacher's own learning as a professional-as the saying goes, 'to teach is to learn twice'. Near-peer teaching in clinical practice has been shown to contribute to the development of both teaching skills and necessary competencies for doctors. Research on how near-peer teachers learn through their teaching roles has mainly focused on classroom learning. However, understanding how the phenomenon of 'teaching is learning twice' occurs in clinical settings and its influencing factors is important for the development of a quality workplace learning environment. Therefore, this study investigated how residents learn through teaching in clinical practice and the factors influencing this process. METHODS: This study's methodology is based on the constructivist grounded theory from a social constructivist perspective. Several teaching hospitals in Japan were included, and the study participants were post-graduate year 2 residents (PGY2s) from these hospitals. The interviews were recorded, transcribed into text, and analysed by the first author. RESULTS: From January 2016 to July 2022, 13 interviews were conducted with 11 PGY2s from nine educational hospitals. The PGY2s played diverse educational roles in clinical settings and learned competencies as physicians in almost all areas through such roles. We found that knowledge transfer and serving as role models stimulated PGY2s' intrinsic motivation, encouraged reflection on their own experiences, and promoted self-regulated learning. Further, educating about procedural skills and clinical reasoning prompted reflection on their own procedural skills and thought processes. Supporting post-graduate year 1 residents' reflections led to the refinement of PGY2s' knowledge and thought processes through the verbal expression of their learning experiences. Such processes required the formation of a community of practice. Thus, education promoted learning through reflection and clarified the expert images of themselves that PGY2s envisaged. CONCLUSIONS: The study found that residents acquire various physician competencies through multiple processes by teaching as near-peer teachers in clinical settings, that a community of practice must be formed for near-peer teaching to occur in a clinical setting, and that teaching brings learning to those who teach by promoting reflection and helping them envision the professionals they aim to be.

The influence of near-peer teaching on undergraduate health professional students' self-efficacy beliefs: A systematic integrative review.

BACKGROUND: Near-peer teaching, a type of peer teaching traditionally used in medical education, has gained popularity as a way of enhancing students' learning in undergraduate health disciplines such as nursing, physiotherapy and paramedicine. Research has established the positive impact of near-peer teaching on health professional students' cognitive and psychomotor outcomes; however, little is known about its influence on students' self-efficacy beliefs, which are important predictors of future clinical performance. AIM: To determine the influence, if any, of near-peer teaching participation on undergraduate health professional students' self-efficacy beliefs. DESIGN: Whittemore and Knafl's integrative review framework was used as a guide to synthesise diverse literature including quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods peer-reviewed studies and grey literature. REVIEW METHODS AND DATA SOURCES: A search was conducted of published literature prior to October 2023 using the MEDLINE, Embase, SCOPUS, ERIC, PsycINFO and CINAHL databases; 1376 non-duplicate studies were identified. Following independent screening by two authors, nine studies were included in the review. Critical appraisal of studies was performed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. Data were extracted and compared to generate themes related to students' self-efficacy outcomes. RESULTS: Seven included studies were quantitative survey-based; five were from medicine. Two studies met all methodological quality criteria. In seven studies, near-peer teaching participation positively influenced junior (i.e., first- and second-year) health professional students' self-efficacy in three domains - psychomotor skills, interprofessional skills and critical thinking. In four studies, near-peer teaching participation enhanced senior (i.e., final- or penultimate-year) health professional students' self-efficacy in teaching. CONCLUSIONS: Few high-quality studies with a focus on near-peer teaching's influence on health professional students' self-efficacy beliefs were found. Available evidence suggests that near-peer teaching may positively impact health professional students' self-efficacy beliefs across several domains. More rigorous, multi-perspective investigations are needed from various health disciplines to build upon this evidence.

Improving preparation for pharmacy entry-to-practice OSCE using a participatory action research.

INTRODUCTION: In Switzerland, becoming a licensed pharmacist requires succeeding a federal entry-to-practice exam that includes an Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE). Candidates from the University of Geneva (UNIGE) exhibited a higher failure rate in this part of the examination in comparison to candidates from other Swiss institutions. The institution made a specific set of pedagogical changes to a 3-week pharmacy services course that is run during their Master's second year to prepare them for their entry-to-practice OSCE. One key change was a switch from a summative in-classroom OSCE to an on-line formative OSCE. METHODS: New teaching activities were introduced between 2019 2020 and 2021-2022 academic years to help students strengthen their patient-facing skills and prepare for the federal OSCE. These online activities consisted in formative OSCEs supplemented with group and individual debriefings and in 18 h clinical case simulations reproducing OSCE requirements and assessed with standardized evaluation grids. Failure rates before and after the introduction of these activities were compared, and their perceived usefulness by UNIGE candidates was collected through a questionnaire survey. RESULTS: The UNIGE failure rate decreased from 6.8% in 2018/2019 to 3.3% in 2022 following the implementation of the new teaching activities. The difference in failure rates between UNIGE and the other institutions became less pronounced in 2022 compared to 2018/2019. The redesigned Master's course was highlighted as useful for preparation, with all new activities perceived as beneficial. Questionnaire responses brought attention to challenges faced by UNIGE candidates, including stress management, insufficient information or practical training, and experiences related to quarantine. These insights informed further development of teaching methods. DISCUSSION: Although the results do not establish a direct link between participation in new teaching activities and increased performance, they suggest resolving the initial issue. Our findings relate to pedagogical concepts such as constructive alignment, formative assessment and examination anxiety, and generally support the benefits of online format. CONCLUSION: This study used a participatory action research based on mixed methods to address a challenge in pharmacy education. Online teaching activities including formative OSCEs, case simulations and debriefings were implemented. Improved performance in entry-to-practice OSCE was subsequently observed. The results highlight the potential of formative, active, and constructively aligned online activities, such as role-playing and case simulation, to enhance patient-facing skills and improve outcomes in summative assessments of these skills.

Intimidating Attendings: The Importance of Near-Peer Mentorship During Third-Year Surgical Clerkship.

INTRODUCTION: Near-peer instruction has grown in popularity in medical education; however, limited data exist to support its effectiveness. This study investigates the perceptions of near-peer style instruction in third-y medical students undergoing a surgical clinical clerkship. We hypothesized that near-peer instruction would provide a beneficial educational experience to third-y medical students during their surgical clinical clerkship. METHODS: The authors anonymously surveyed third-y medical students undergoing their clinical clerkship in surgery on their perception of the near-peer instruction and mentorship they received from fourth-y medical students at the beginning of the clerkship. Near-peer instruction included teaching suturing techniques, surgical procedures and anatomy, operating room literacy, and sharing anecdotal experiences. Surveys were distributed 24 h after receiving the formal instruction. RESULTS: A total of 85 students completed the survey (78% response rate). Students reported a similar or increase in value of learning from near-peer mentors compared to attending physicians (less valuable: 1.2%; just as valuable: 52.9%; more valuable: 45.9%). The majority of students indicated they would like to experience more near-peer style instruction in medical school as demonstrated in surgical clerkship training (absolutely no: 0%; probably not: 0%; on the fence: 4.7%; probably yes: 25.9%; absolutely yes: 69.4%). After experiencing near-peer instruction and mentoring, students were more interested in becoming near-peer mentors (less interested: 1.2%; just as interested: 29.4%; more interested: 69.4%). CONCLUSIONS: Students appreciate and desire near-peer instruction, seeing it as an effective learning method. Mentees undergoing near-peer style instruction have an increased interest in becoming near-peer mentors.

Near-Peer Paradigms in Medical School: Integrating Student Teaching Assistants Into a Core Radiology Clerkship.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: Near-peer paradigms have been demonstrated effective in supporting how students navigate novel clinical environments. In this study, we describe an innovative model of incorporating teaching assistants (TAs) into a core radiology clerkship and investigate both its perceived educational value by clinical-year learners and its perceived impact on professional growth by TAs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: At one U.S. medical school, the core clinical year includes a clerkship in radiology incorporating both reading room exposure and a didactic curriculum. Radiology faculty deliver a variety of traditional and interactive, "dynamic" lectures, while medical student TAs deliver additional dynamic sessions, including a final TA-created review session. The educational value of each didactic session by clerkship students was assessed using a five-point scale survey, and the professional value of the experience by TAs was assessed using a five-point Likert survey. RESULTS: Spanning from 2020 to 2023, 268 (74.4%) clinical-year students submitted the post-clerkship survey, with the didactic review sessions created and led by TAs receiving the highest ratings of any didactic session. Of 16 former TAs, 12 (75%) completed the post-service survey, with all respondents agreeing or strongly agreeing that they enjoyed and would recommend their experience, and that it enhanced their interest in radiology and in academic medicine. CONCLUSION: Near-peer education in a core radiology clerkship enhances the experience of the learner through peer guidance and the experience of the teacher through professional development. These findings may increase student interest in pursuing academic radiology as a career and invite opportunities for broadening medical school education in radiology.

Developing supervisory and precepting skills through simulation: Near peer teaching in a skills laboratory.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Near-peer teaching is an innovative approach to teaching the skills of supervising and precepting while benefiting students with different levels of experience and academic training. This study describes near-peer activities in skills-based laboratory courses that provided opportunities for one-on-one teaching to benefit learners in the introductory lab courses while simultaneously training more advanced students for future supervisory and precepting roles. EDUCATIONAL ACTIVITY & SETTING: Three community pharmacy near-peer teaching simulations were designed and implemented: 1) Patient Counseling and Medication Adherence, 2) Dispensing and Patient Counseling, and 3) Drug Utilization Review and Prescriber Calls. These activities took place over two semesters of a pharmacy skills lab with all first- and third-year Doctor of Pharmacy students. FINDINGS: In Autumn 2019, 80% (111/139) of P1s and 67% (80/119) of P3s responded to the course evaluation survey. In Spring 2020, 73% (100/137) of P1s and 68% (80/118) of P3s responded to the course evaluation survey. The P3s reported increased confidence in their ability to provide meaningful feedback, while P1s reported increased confidence in communicating with patients and healthcare providers. Performance data revealed that most P1s and P3s completed dispensing and communication activities accurately using a near-peer approach. Overall, the P1s and P3s felt the activities were valuable learning experiences. SUMMARY: The near-peer activities described in this study fill a gap in the training of pharmacy graduates for future precepting and supervisory roles. Evaluation of these near-peer activities suggest that both junior and senior learners benefit from simulated preceptor-intern interactions, supporting this innovative approach to address supervisory and precepting responsibilities.

A junior doctor led near-peer acute ENT/head and neck surgery workshop for medical students.

Background: Near-peer teaching (NPT) involves teaching by peers who are at a close, but not the same, level of training. This study investigated whether a novel surgical NPT workshop, designed and delivered by junior doctors using simulation models for acute otolaryngology conditions, improved the knowledge and confidence level of senior medical students. Methods: A one-day NPT workshop was held for medical students in their third year of a four-year postgraduate medical degree at the University of Notre Dame, Sydney, Australia. Four acute otolaryngology/head and neck surgery problems that might be encountered by junior doctors and require prompt management were chosen. These were post-operative neck swelling, epistaxis, and tracheostomy management (obstruction and bleeding). Six junior doctors facilitated didactic tutorials and practical skills training using models. Multiple choice question mini-tests and questionnaires were administered before and after the workshop to assess changes in students' knowledge and confidence in assessment, management, and practical skills. Results: The most common reason for participation was to acquire knowledge and practical skills (93.2 %). Mean correct MCQ mini-test knowledge scores increased significantly from 60 % pre-workshop to 83.9 % post-workshop (p < 0.05). Students reported significantly increased confidence in recognition and management of all four conditions. All students favoured including the course in their curriculum and would recommend the course to others. The tutors subjectively reported valuable teaching experience. Conclusion: NPT is an effective method for teaching medical students how to assess and manage acute otolaryngology/ENT surgery conditions that may present as emergencies for junior medical officers on the ward.

Teaching Ultrasound-Guided Venous Cannulation to Newly Qualified Doctors.

Background Venous cannulation is an essential task that allows the intravenous administration of fluids and medications. In the United Kingdom, this task is often performed by newly qualified Foundation Year 1 (FY1) doctors; however, difficulties are commonly encountered. The usage of ultrasound increases the chance of successful cannulation, provided the operator has been trained. Some medical schools now include ultrasound in their undergraduate curricula, though this is far from universal. Methods Forty-eight FY1s received a one-hour teaching session on ultrasound-guided venous cannulation, delivered by near-peer Education Fellows. FY1s completed questionnaires immediately after the teaching session, and a follow-up questionnaire three months later. Findings 44.44% of FY1s felt "fairly" or "very" confident in ultrasound-guided venous cannulation at follow-up, compared to 6.66% before the session. Sixty-three attempts were made in the month before the follow-up survey, compared to six in the month prior to the teaching session. The success rate at follow-up was 60% (38/63), up from 50% (3/6) prior to the session. One third fewer cannulas were escalated to senior doctors (72 vs 48), although there was little change in escalations to anesthetists, from 15 vs 18. FY1s identified the lack of ultrasound machines on the wards as a barrier to using ultrasound-guided venous cannulation more often. Conclusion A short, near-peer teaching session can improve FY1s' confidence, usage, and success rates in ultrasound-guided venous cannulation.

Comparing the impact of surgical expert versus non-ophthalmologist instructors on virtual-reality surgical performance: A randomized controlled trial.

PURPOSE: To compare Manual Small Incision Cataract Surgery (MSICS) microsurgical performance in course participants who received virtual reality simulation-based training by either a surgical expert or a non-ophthalmologist instructor. SETTING: Copenhagen Academy for Medical Education and Simulation, Copenhagen, Denmark. DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial. METHODS: Residents and specialists in ophthalmology with no prior MSICS experience were included to receive virtual reality simulation training in MSICS using the HelpMeSee simulator. The participants were randomly allocated to receive training from either an experienced MSICS surgeon or a non-ophthalmologist, also known as near-peer teaching. The performances of the participants were evaluated at baseline and post-training using a MSICS proficiency-based test with evidence of validity. RESULTS: Thirty participants were included in the study and 29 completed the course. There was no significant difference in final test score between the two groups (p = 0.13). The performance score of both groups of participants increased significantly after receiving the training (p < 0.001). All participants passed the proficiency-based test after receiving the training. CONCLUSION: We found no significant difference in surgical proficiency-level whether the participants were trained by a surgical expert or a non-ophthalmologist instructor for MSICS in a virtual-reality based setting. The findings of this study suggest that near-peer teaching within microsurgical performance potentially could be applied with teaching outcomes comparable to a surgical expert-instructor.

MUSIG: An Example Highlighting the Value of Student Led POCUS Education, Influenced by the COVID-19 Pandemic.

There has been a recent push for more formal ultrasound teaching in medical school curricula. Faculty availability, however, presents a significant barrier to its implementation. Medical student interest groups such as the McGill Ultrasound Interest Group (MUSIG), aimed to address this barrier by using near-peer instruction (NPI) to teach ultrasound to other students. MUSIG has helped teach hundreds of students about the fundamentals of ultrasound and its applicability in clinical practice by creating ultrasound conferences, friendly ultrasound competitions, virtual lectures, and educational resources. This paper aims to use MUSIG as an example to highlight the important role students can play in changing the landscape of medical education.

Perceptions of near-peer teaching in a pharmacy skills-based laboratory.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the perception of students, faculty, and previous lab coaches on a near-peer teaching model integrated into a skills-based laboratory. METHODS: As part of a longitudinal near-peer teaching experience, third professional year students are utilized as lab coaches in a skills-based laboratory course. Lab coaches deliver lectures, provide feedback, facilitate activities, and assist with class preparation spanning 2 semesters for first and second professional year students. Students enrolled in the courses received an anonymous 12-question survey to assess the comfort and helpfulness of feedback when working with a lab coach and faculty during the 2021-2022 academic year. Statistical analysis was conducted using descriptive and inferential statistics for survey questions, and thematic analysis for open-ended responses. Semi-structured interviews with previous lab coaches and faculty were conducted, and thematic analysis was utilized for the responses. RESULTS: The student survey had an 81.4% response rate (n = 114). Students were significantly more comfortable working with and asking questions to a lab coach than a faculty instructor (mean [SD] of 4.78 [0.66] vs 4.44 [0.75]). Nine (75%) previous lab coaches and 6 (43%) faculty members were also interviewed. A total of 6 themes regarding perceptions of the lab coach position emerged: positive impact on personal and professional development; relationship building; rewarding experience recommended to others; robust teaching experience; struggles and challenges faced by both faculty and lab coaches; appreciation of the position by faculty. CONCLUSION: Implementing near-peer teachers into a pharmacy skills-based laboratory was very well received by students, previous lab coaches, and faculty.

Evaluating the impact of a teaching course for GP speciality trainees.

INTRODUCTION: Near-peer teaching offers mutual benefits for clinical trainees and the students they teach. However, General Practice Speciality Trainees (GPSTs) are typically less involved in community-based teaching than their hospital-based peers and often do so without formal pedagogical training. This study details the immediate and longer-term evaluation of a teaching skills course delivered to final year GPSTs. It addresses a gap within existing near-peer literature which, although extensive, is predominantly hospital-based and limited to short-term outcomes. METHODS: The course was designed and delivered to all local final year GPST schemes. Pre- and post-course questionnaires scoring confidence, comfort, and understanding of teaching roles were analysed across two years' delivery. Furthermore, individual interviews of participants 4-6 months after attendance were thematically analysed to explore how GPSTs translated course content into practice. RESULTS: GPSTs reported a decline in their teaching activities as they embarked on their final year of GP teaching. Immediate post-course teaching-related confidence and knowledge scores increased. However, follow-up interviews revealed that GPSTs' initial enthusiasm was short-lived and outweighed by competing demands within an intensive short-duration training scheme. They expressed concerns about their own learner status as they themselves developed competency in a vast and varied speciality, and cited a lack of support from their trainers. CONCLUSIONS: Teaching skill courses alone are insufficient to address the ongoing challenges of enhancing the teaching role of GPSTs. Further work is now needed to explore multi-level interventions to promote the role of GPSTs as near-peer teachers to harness the mutual benefits to all involved.

Enhancing knowledge mastery in resident students through peer-teaching: a study in respiratory medicine.

AIM: The transition from medical students to competent physicians requires comprehensive training during residency programs. In China, resident students typically undergo 2- or 3-year training programs. While they learn from patient interactions under the guidance of experienced doctors, integrating theoretical knowledge from textbooks into practical cases remains a challenge. This study aimed to explore the impact of medical interns acting as peer-students on the knowledge mastery of resident students. METHOD: The participants of this study consisted of resident students specializing in respiratory medicine at the Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University, School of Medicine. Resident students were given the opportunity to volunteer as peer-teachers for medical interns in the respiratory department. Those who chose to instruct interns were automatically placed into the test group, while those who opted not to partake in intern instruction formed the control group. In their role as peer-teachers, resident students assumed the responsibility of guiding interns in patient management throughout the entire continuum, spanning from initial engagement to discharge, a commitment that extended over a minimum period of 2 weeks. The resident students' academic performance was evaluated through a departmental examination consisting of 50 multiple-choice questions, which was administered upon completing their rotation. Statistical analysis was performed to assess the impact of peer-teaching on the resident students' performance. RESULTS: Between January 2023 and June 2023, a total of 158 resident students completed their rotation in the respiratory department. Among them, 40 resident students willingly took on the responsibility of instructing medical interns, while 118 resident students did not participate in intern teaching. With a "one-to-one" teaching policy in place, the overall satisfaction rate of the interns was an impressive 95.35%. Pre-rotation test scores for the test group averaged 81.66 ± 8.325 (Mean ± SD) and the control group averaged 81.66 ± 8.002, without significance. The departmental examination scores of the test group averaged 85.60 ± 7.886, while the control group scored an average of 82.25 ± 8.292, with a statistically significant difference (p = 0.027). CONCLUSION: In conclusion, our study underscores the positive influence of peer-teaching on the knowledge mastery of resident students.

Promoting physical activity and youth development in schools: the case for near-peer coaches.

Background: Sports-based youth development (SBYD) programs provide an inclusive, supportive environment for promoting physical activity as well as nurturing the development of life skills which, in combination, promote physical, mental, and emotional health in youth. The Up2Us Sports SBYD program was implemented in six schools in New Orleans, Louisiana in 2020-2022, where near-peer coaches from the community were placed in schools and present throughout the school day. The intervention period straddled the COVID-19 pandemic as well as extreme weather events, modifying program delivery. Process/methods: An exploratory case study was conducted to understand participant experience amid program disruptions and modifications, as well as their perceptions of program impact on physical activity and health. Interviews with coaches (n = 7), focus groups with youth (n = 14) and program observation data were triangulated to provide a description of the case. Results: The major theme that emerged from the case study was the centrality of the near-peer mentorship relationships between coaches and youth. Participants believed near-peer relationships facilitated life skill development and increased opportunity for physical activity in schools, but pressures on coaches' time and external challenges in the community were limiting factors to the extent of program impact. Conclusion: This community case study demonstrates the potential role for near-peer mentors in influencing the health and wellbeing of youth from under-resourced communities and highlights the opportunity for school-based SBYD programming to provide youth with a consistent source of both relational and physical activity support.