Prevalence and characteristics of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia with a bystander concealed nodoventricular/nodofascicular pathway.

BACKGROUND: The concealed nodoventricular/nodofascicular (NV/NF) pathway is mostly a bystander, retrograde bypass tract connecting the right ventricle/right bundle branch (RBB) and slow pathway that is observed in patients with atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT). However, its prevalence and characteristics in response to pacing maneuvers have not been fully evaluated. OBJECTIVE: This study investigated the prevalence and characteristics of AVNRT with a bystander NV/NF pathway. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 153 consecutive patients undergoing catheter ablation of AVNRT. After exclusion of 52 patients with inadequate electrophysiologic data, 101 patients composed the study population. RESULTS: Three patients (3.0%) had bystander concealed NV/NF pathways, all of which were connected to the slow pathway. The tachycardia was typical slow pathway/fast pathway AVNRT in 2 patients and atypical fast pathway/slow pathway AVNRT in 1 patient. In all cases, His-refractory ventricular extra-stimuli (VES) reset the AVNRTs with delay through the NV/NF pathways. Ventricular overdrive pacing (VOP) in the early phase also reset the AVNRT with delay. Earlier VES and middle phase of VOP did not reset the tachycardia, and further earlier VES and late phase of VOP reset the tachycardia with advance through the RBB-His conduction. CONCLUSION: A bystander NV/NF pathway was not rare in patients with AVNRT. The VES and VOP for the AVNRTs with the bystander NV/NF pathways were characterized by the 2-phase resetting phenomenon: initial transient resetting with delay through the NV/NF pathway, and late resetting with advance through the RBB-His conduction.

Novel Diagnostic Observations of Nodoventricular/Nodofascicular Pathway-Related Orthodromic Reciprocating Tachycardia Differentiating From Atrioventricular Nodal Re-Entrant Tachycardia.

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to assess the performance of current diagnostic criteria and identify additional electrophysiological features differentiating orthodromic reciprocating tachycardia (ORT) with a concealed nodoventricular/nodofascicular (NV/NF) pathway from atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardia (AVNRT). BACKGROUND: Diagnosing sustained supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) despite the occurrence of ventriculoatrial block (VAB) is challenging. METHODS: We analyzed electrograms of 25 sustained SVTs (9 NV/NF-ORTs [n = 7/2] and 16 AVNRTs) with VAB and 91 AVNRTs without VAB (for reference). RESULTS: More than 1 SVT, each with a different ventriculoatrial interval, was commonly induced in AVNRT cases (75%) but not in NV/NF-ORT cases (0%; p = 0.0005). Wenckebach VAB was common in NV/NF-ORTs (78%), but VAB patterns varied in AVNRTs. The His-His interval transiently prolonged in the following beat after the VAB in most AVNRTs but rarely did in NV/NF-ORTs (79% vs. 22%; p = 0.01). NV/NF-ORT was diagnosed by His-refractory premature ventricular contractions (n = 5) and the findings during right ventricular overdrive pacing showing an uncorrected/corrected post-pacing interval (PPI)-tachycardia cycle length (TCL) ≤115/110 ms (n = 5/5), orthodromic His capture (n = 6), and V-V-A (ventricle-ventricle-atrial response) response (n = 3). A single form of induced SVT (positive predictive value [PPV]: 69%; negative predictive value [NPV]: 100%), Wenckebach VAB (PPV: 70%; NPV: 87%), stable His-His interval despite VAB (PPV: 70%; NPV: 85%), orthodromic His capture (PPV: 100%; NPV: 97%), and V-V-A response (PPV: 100%; NPV: 95%) characterized NV/NF-ORT, and a PPI-TCL of ≤125 ms (PPV: 100%; NPV: 100%) characterized NV-ORT. CONCLUSIONS: Induction of a single SVT form, Wenckebach VAB, stable His-His interval despite VAB, orthodromic His capture, and V-V-A response appeared to discriminate NV/NF-ORT from AVNRT, with a PPI-TCL of ≤125 ms discriminating NV-ORT from NF-ORT and AVNRT.

Clinical Features and Sites of Ablation for Patients With Incessant Supraventricular Tachycardia From Concealed Nodofascicular and Nodoventricular Tachycardias.

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to describe the clinical features and sites of successful ablation for incessant nodofascicular (NF) and nodoventricular (NV) tachycardias. BACKGROUND: Incessant supraventricular tachycardias have been associated with tachycardia-induced cardiomyopathies and have been previously attributed to permanent junctional reciprocating tachycardias, atrial tachycardias, and atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardias. Incessant concealed NF and NV tachycardias have not been described previously. METHODS: Three cases of incessant concealed NF and NV re-entrant tachycardias were identified from 2 centers. RESULTS: The authors describe 3 cases with incessant supraventricular tachycardia resulting from NV (2 cases) and NF (1 case) pathways. Atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardia was excluded by His synchronous premature ventricular complexes that either delayed or terminated the tachycardia. Ventricular pacing showed constant and progressive fusion in cases 1 and 3. In 2 cases, there was spontaneous initiation with a 1:2 response (cases 1 and 3); the presence of retrograde longitudinal dissociation or marked decremental pathway conduction in cases 1 and 3 sustains these tachycardias. The NV pathway was successfully ablated in the slow pathway region in case 3 and at the right bundle branch in case 1. The NF pathway was successfully ablated within the proximal coronary sinus in case 2. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first report of incessant supraventricular tachycardia using concealed NF or NV pathways. These tachycardias demonstrated spontaneous initiation from sinus rhythm with a 1:2 response and retrograde longitudinal dissociation or marked decremental pathway conduction. Successful ablation was achieved at either right-sided sites or within the coronary sinus.