Potent synergy and sustained bactericidal activity of polymyxins combined with Gram-positive only class of antibiotics versus four Gram-negative bacteria.

BACKGROUND: Gram-negative bacteria (GNB) are becoming increasingly resistant to a wide variety of antibiotics. There are currently limited treatments for GNB, and the combination of antibiotics with complementary mechanisms has been reported to be a feasible strategy for treating GNB infection. The inability to cross the GNB outer membrane (OM) is an important reason that a broad spectrum of Gram-positive only class of antibiotics (GPOAs) is lacking. Polymyxins may help GPOAs to permeate by disrupting OM of GNB. OBJECTIVE: To identify what kind of GPOAs can be aided to broaden their anti-GNB spectrum by polymyxins, we systematically investigated the synergy of eight GPOAs in combination with colistin (COL) and polymyxin B (PMB) against GNB in vitro. METHODS: The synergistic effect of COL or PMB and GPOAs combinations against GNB reference strains and clinical isolates were determined by checkerboard tests. The killing kinetics of the combinations were assessed using time-kill assays. RESULTS: In the checkerboard tests, polymyxins-GPOAs combinations exert synergistic effects characterized by species and strain specificity. The synergistic interactions on P. aeruginosa strains are significantly lower than those on strains of A. baumannii, K. pneumoniae and E. coli. Among all the combinations, COL has shown the best synergistic effect in combination with dalbavancin (DAL) or oritavancin (ORI) versus almost all of the strains tested, with FICIs from 0.16 to 0.50 and 0.13 to < 0.28, respectively. In addition, the time-kill assays demonstrated that COL/DAL and COL/ORI had sustained bactericidal activity. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicated that polymyxins could help GPOAs to permeate the OM of specific GNB, thus showed synergistic effects and bactericidal effects in the in vitro assays. In vivo combination studies should be further conducted to validate the results of this study.

What Place Is There for Long-Acting Antibiotics in the Management of Gram-Positive Infections? A Qualitative Cross-Sectional Study.

OBJECTIVES: To identify the current practices with long half-life lipoglycopeptides (LGPs) and potential use/position of oritavancin. RESULTS: Despite their indication being limited to skin and soft tissue infections (SSTIs), long half-life lipoglycopeptides are mainly used off-label to treat bone and joint infections (BJIs) and infective endocarditis. Oritavancin and dalbavancin are both semisynthetic lipoglycopeptide antibiotics with activity against Gram-positive organisms. The game-changing property of these two antibiotics is their one-time dosing. Due to its shorter half-life, oritavancin might have an advantage over dalbavancin for a treatment duration of less than 2 weeks, as it could be used both in prolonged treatments of complicated patients in BJIs or administered as a single-dose treatment for Gram-positive cocci infections usually treated by a 5- to 10-day antibiotic course. These infections include urinary tract infections, bacteremias, catheter-related infections, etc. In addition to the possibility of being used as an end-of-treatment injection, oritavancin could be used as an empiric therapy treatment in the postoperative period in the context of device-associated especially prosthetic joint infections to allow for the early discharge of the patient. METHODS: A qualitative survey was conducted in March 2022 including sixteen infectiologists, one internist, five hospital pharmacists, and one pharmacologist. CONCLUSION: Long half-life lipoglycopeptides contribute to changing the paradigm in the management of acute bacterial infections, as infectiologists now consider a range of indications and patient profiles for one single drug. Oritavancin strengthens the therapeutic arsenal in numerous infections from BJIs to urinary tract infections and could help to manage specific clinical situations, on top of providing potential benefits for the hospital's budget.

Rational construction of a high-quality and high-efficiency biosynthetic system and fermentation optimization for A82846B based on combinatorial strategies in Amycolatopsis orientalis.

BACKGROUND: Oritavancin is a new generation of semi-synthetic glycopeptide antibiotics against Gram-positive bacteria, which served as the first and only antibiotic with a single-dose therapeutic regimen to treat ABSSSI. A naturally occurring glycopeptide A82846B is the direct precursor of oritavancin. However, its application has been hampered by low yields and homologous impurities. This study established a multi-step combinatorial strategy to rationally construct a high-quality and high-efficiency biosynthesis system for A82846B and systematically optimize its fermentation process to break through the bottleneck of microbial fermentation production. RESULTS: Firstly, based on the genome sequencing and analysis, we deleted putative competitive pathways and constructed a better A82846B-producing strain with a cleaner metabolic background, increasing A82846B production from 92 to 174 mg/L. Subsequently, the PhiC31 integrase system was introduced based on the CRISPR-Cas12a system. Then, the fermentation level of A82846B was improved to 226 mg/L by over-expressing the pathway-specific regulator StrR via the constructed PhiC31 system. Furthermore, overexpressing glycosyl-synthesis gene evaE enhanced the production to 332 mg/L due to the great conversion of the intermediate to target product. Finally, the scale-up production of A82846B reached 725 mg/L in a 15 L fermenter under fermentation optimization, which is the highest reported yield of A82846B without the generation of homologous impurities. CONCLUSION: Under approaches including blocking competitive pathways, inserting site-specific recombination system, overexpressing regulator, overexpressing glycosyl-synthesis gene and optimizing fermentation process, a multi-step combinatorial strategy for the high-level production of A82846B was developed, constructing a high-producing strain AO-6. The combinatorial strategies employed here can be widely applied to improve the fermentation level of other microbial secondary metabolites, providing a reference for constructing an efficient microbial cell factory for high-value natural products.

Head-to-head comparison of multi-dose oritavancin and dalbavancin for complicated infections: A propensity score-matched analysis.

BACKGROUND: Oritavancin and dalbavancin are long-acting lipoglycopeptide antibiotics approved for the treatment of skin and skin structure infections. Recently, they have been used for outpatient antimicrobial therapy for complicated infections. No head-to-head studies exist for this purpose. OBJECTIVE: To compare outcomes of patients treated with multiple doses of oritavancin or dalbavancin for complicated infections. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a single-centre, retrospective cohort study evaluating adult patients who received two or more doses of lipoglycopeptides for complicated infections from February 2019 through December 2022. Patients receiving oritavancin were compared to dalbavancin after propensity score-matching. The primary endpoint was clinical success at 90 days. Other endpoints included: 30-day re-admission, 30-day mortality, adverse drug reactions (ADRs), and changes in white blood cell count and inflammatory markers after the first dose. RESULTS: After exclusions and propensity score-matching, 131 matched pairs (N = 262) were included in the analysis. Most patients were receiving lipoglycopeptide therapy for osteomyelitis. There was no significant difference in clinical success at 90 days in patients who received oritavancin compared to those who received dalbavancin (99 [76%] vs. 103 [79%], respectively; P = 0.556). There was no significant difference in secondary endpoints, however, there was a trend towards higher incidence of ADRs oritavancin compared to dalbavancin (9 [7%] vs. 2 [2%], respectively; P = 0.060) which led to more treatment discontinuation. CONCLUSION: There was no significant difference in efficacy between multi-dose oritavancin and dalbavancin for the treatment of complicated infections. Both agents were generally well tolerated; however, dalbavancin may be better tolerated when long-term treatment is warranted.

New Frontier on Antimicrobial Therapy: Long-Acting Lipoglycopeptides.

Long-acting lipoglycopeptides (LGPs), such as dalbavancin and oritavancin, are semisynthetic antibiotics known for their strong effectiveness against a wide array of Gram-positive bacteria. This includes Staphylococcus aureus, both methicillin-sensitive (MSSA) and methicillin-resistant (MRSA) strains, coagulase-negative Staphylococci (CoNS), streptococci, and vancomycin-sensitive Enterococcus faecalis. A literature search was conducted on PubMed and on ClinicalTrials.gov to identify articles published until July 2023 investigating the use of oritavancin and dalbavancin in clinical practice. The review included case reports, case series, observational studies, and clinical studies. Although more consistent data are needed, LGPs seem to be a good alternative that may provide a quicker hospital discharge and reduce long-term intravenous access and therapy. This is attributed to their unique pharmacologic and pharmacokinetic characteristics. More quality data (i.e., number of patients treated with clinical success) are needed before clinicians may use these therapies more widely.

Oritavancin Versus Daptomycin for Osteomyelitis Treatment After Surgical Debridement.

INTRODUCTION: Weekly intravenous (IV) oritavancin and daily daptomycin were compared in an outpatient setting following extensive surgical debridement for treating patients with osteomyelitis. METHODS: This was a retrospective, observational study of patients diagnosed with acute osteomyelitis. Exclusion criteria were the use of Gram-negative antibiotic therapy, use of antibiotics for more than 48 h prior to oritavancin or daptomycin or prior use of > 2 doses of oritavancin or more than 4 weeks of daptomycin. Clinical success was resolution or improvement of symptoms and no further treatment. Data were analyzed with Chi-square test or Fisher's exact test. RESULTS: Consecutive outpatients (n = 150) with acute osteomyelitis who were treated with oritavancin or daptomycin (1:1) following extensive surgical debridement were identified. Staphylococcus aureus was the most common pathogen (n = 117). No patient in either group received prior antibiotic therapy (previous 30 days) or was hospitalized within 90 days prior to surgical debridement. Twenty-one (28%) patients prescribed oritavancin had chronic kidney disease, seven of whom were receiving hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis. Compared to oritavancin, patients prescribed daptomycin had higher rates of all-cause readmission [odds ratio (OR) 2.89; p < 0.001], more infection-related readmission (OR 3.19; p < 0.001), and greater likelihood of receiving antibiotics post-discontinuation of initial therapy (OR 2.13; p < 0.001). Repeat surgical debridement was required for 68.0% with daptomycin vs. 23.1% with oritavancin (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Oritavancin demonstrated a significantly higher rate of clinical success compared to daptomycin, with lower all-cause and infection-related readmissions, reduced need for repeat surgical debridement, and fewer additional antibiotic requirements.

Oritavancin as sequential therapy for Gram-positive bloodstream infections.

BACKGROUND: Oritavancin, a long-acting lipoglycopeptide approved for use in acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections, has limited data evaluating use in serious infections due to Gram-positive organisms. We aimed to assess the effectiveness and safety of oritavancin for consolidative treatment of Gram-positive bloodstream infections (BSI), including infective endocarditis (IE). METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study evaluating adult patients admitted to University of Colorado Hospital from March 2016 to January 2022 who received ≥ 1 oritavancin dose for treatment of Gram-positive BSI. Patients were excluded if the index culture was drawn at an outside facility or were > 89 years of age. The primary outcome was a 90-day composite failure (clinical or microbiological failure) in those with 90-day follow-up. Secondary outcomes included individual components of the primary outcome, acute kidney injury (AKI), infusion-related reactions (IRR), and institutional cost avoidance. RESULTS: Overall, 72 patients were included. Mean ± SD age was 54 ± 16 years, 61% were male, and 10% had IE. Organisms most commonly causing BSI were Staphylococcus aureus (68%, 17% methicillin-resistant), followed by Streptococcus spp. (26%), and Enterococcus spp. (10%). Patients received standard-of-care antibiotics before oritavancin for a median (IQR) of 11 (5-17) days. Composite failure in the clinically evaluable population (n = 64) at 90-days occurred in 14% and was composed of clinical and microbiological failure, which occurred in 14% and 5% of patients, respectively. Three patients (4%) experienced AKI after oritavancin, and two (3%) experienced an IRR. Oritavancin utilization resulted in earlier discharge for 94% of patients corresponding to an institutional cost-avoidance of $3,055,804 (mean $44,938/patient) from 1,102 hospital days saved (mean 16 days/patient). CONCLUSIONS: The use of oritavancin may be an effective sequential therapy for Gram-positive BSI to facilitate early discharge resulting in institutional cost avoidance.

Vancomycin-resistant enterococcus bloodstream infection successfully managed with oritavancin and fosfomycin as sequential treatment.

Bloodstream infections caused by vancomycin-resistant enterococci are increasingly reported and a consensus therapy does not exist. Oritavancin has shown good antimicrobial activity against VRE, but its use is mainly limited to skin, soft tissue, and/or bone infections. Fosfomycin is increasingly used for enterococcal infections (including bloodstream infections and endocarditis) as a partner drug given its anti-biofilm and synergistic properties. Recently in vitro and in vivo synergism between oritavancin and fosfomycin against VRE isolates has been demonstrated. Herein we report the case of a hematologic patient with a VRE bloodstream infection successfully treated with oritavancin and fosfomycin as sequential treatment.

Efficacy of oritavancin and nisin alone and their combination against vancomycin resistant enterococci strains in hospitalized patients in Turkiye.

PURPOSE: Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococci (VREs) have emerged and become a problem that threatens the health of hospitalized patients. VRE can cause different serious infections of the urinary tract, the bloodstream, wound and other body sites. VREs are resistant to multiple antibiotics and treatment options are very limited. We aimed to investigate the efficacy of oritavancin and nisin alone and their combination against VRE strains. METHODS: VRE isolates from rectal swabs of hospitalized patients were identified by conventional and commercial methods. The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC) of oritavancin and nisin against VRE strains were determined. The synergistic effect of both agent combinations was examined by the Checkerboard test. RESULTS: All VRE strains were identifined as Enterococcus faecium. The MIC value of oritavancin was found in the range of 0.015-0.24 â€‹µg/mL; in which 48 strains were susceptible (≤0.12 â€‹µg/mL) and two strains were resistant (>0.12 â€‹µg/mL). The MBC of oritavancin was determined in the range of 0.06-3.84 â€‹µg/mL. The MIC of nisin was found in the range of 12.5-100 â€‹µg/mL; in which 32 strains were susceptible (≤50 â€‹µg/mL) and 18 strains were resistant (>50 â€‹µg/mL). MBC of nisin was determined in the range of 25-800 â€‹µg/mL. Two oritavancin resistant strains were displayed indifference effect, whereas from 18 nisin resistant strains, 11 showed indifference, and seven displayed synergistic effect. Thirty-eight out of 48 strains which were sensitive to oritavancin showed indifference and 10 revealed synergistic effect, whereas 29 of 32 strains which were sensitive to nisin showed indifference and three had synergistic effect. CONCLUSIONS: A synergistic combination of oritavansin and nisin was detected in 20 strains (40%), Our study is the first study in Turkiye.

The role of long-acting antibiotics in the clinical practice: a narrative review.

Introduction: The increasing emergence of bacterial strains with new resistance determinants has become a threat to current antibiotic therapies in recent years. This has prompted research for innovative options with improved efficacy and safety profiles: long-acting glycopeptides, such as dalbavancin and oritavancin, are currently approved for the treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSI). Their efficacy, microbiological profile, and ease of administration may provide an answer to this challenge, as well as reducing length of stay and hospital costs. This narrative review aims to explore the current evidence on the real-word use of dalbavancin and oritavancin, in labelled and off-label indications in clinical practice. Methods: A PubMed library database search with no time limits was performed using the following terms: long-acting antibiotics, dalbavancin, oritavancin. Discussion: Registration studies confirmed non-inferiority of long-acting glycopeptides to standard of care in ABSSSI (dalbavancin DISCOVER 1 and 2: 79.7% clinical success in the dalbavancin group and 79.8% in the vancomycin-linezolid group; oritavancin SOLO I: 82,3% clinical success in the oritavancin group versus 78,9% for the vancomycin group; SOLO II: 80,1% clinical success versus 82,9%). Large cohorts have confirmed similar success rates in ABSSSI treatment in real-world practice. Evidence for off-label indications is still rather scarce but promising, especially in bone and joint infections therapy for both dalbavancin and oritavancin, and infective endocarditis for dalbavancin. Moreover, these drugs may have their place in non-adherent patients, in setting of addition or difficult access to healthcare. Another potential use of these drugs is in patients with oral intake impairment or reduced gastro-intestinal absorption. However, the low penetration in cerebrospinal fluid of dalbavancin and the unfavourable outcomes in the only case report of oritavancin treatment in human meningitis despite encouraging animal models would seem to make these molecules unsuitable for central nervous system infection therapy. Most of the available evidence is based on small retrospective cohorts, so robust prospective studies investigating off-label indications are needed.

New Antimicrobials and New Therapy Strategies for Endocarditis: Weapons That Should Be Defended.

The overall low-quality evidence concerning the clinical benefits of different antibiotic regimens for the treatment of infective endocarditis (IE), which has made it difficult to strongly support or reject any regimen of antibiotic therapy, has led to a discrepancy between the available guidelines and clinical practice. In this complex scenario, very recently published guidelines have attempted to fill this gap. Indeed, in recent years several antimicrobials have entered the market, including ceftobiprole, ceftaroline, and the long-acting lipoglycopeptides dalbavancin and oritavancin. Despite being approved for different indications, real-world data on their use for the treatment of IE, alone or in combination, has accumulated over time. Furthermore, an old antibiotic, fosfomycin, has gained renewed interest for the treatment of complicated infections such as IE. In this narrative review, we focused on new antimicrobials and therapeutic strategies that we believe may provide important contributions to the advancement of Gram-positive IE treatment, providing a summary of the current in vitro, in vivo, and clinical evidence supporting their use in clinical practice.

Oritavancin vs Standard of Care for Treatment of Nonendovascular Gram-Positive Bloodstream Infections.

Background: Data is limited comparing oritavancin (ORT) to the standard-of-care (SOC) for the treatment gram-positive blood stream infections (BSI). Methods: This was a retrospective study of all patients in the Veteran's Affairs Health Care System treated with at least 1 dose of oritavancin or at least 5 days of vancomycin, daptomycin, ceftaroline, ampicillin, ampicillin-sulbactam, nafcillin, oxacillin, or cefazolin for a documented gram-positive BSI from 1 January 2015 to 30 June 2021. Patients with polymicrobial blood cultures or positive cultures from other sites were included if the organisms were sensitive to the incident antimicrobial; no concomitant antimicrobials could be used once the incident agent was started. Individuals were also excluded if they were diagnosed with endocarditis, had a neutrophil count 96-hours of treatment before the incident antimicrobial was started.The primary composite outcome was clinical failure, defined as all-cause mortality within 30-days from the end of therapy, or blood cultures positive for the incident organisms ≥72 hours after administration of the first dose and ≤30 days after the administration of the final dose of the study antimicrobial, or any drug or line-related readmissions within 30-days of hospital discharge. Results: Two hundred-forty patients were identified for screening with 96 meeting criteria (27 in ORT and 69 in SOC groups). Baseline characteristics were generally balanced between groups except more patients in the ORT group received >96-hours of treatment before the incident antimicrobial was started (70.3% (19/27) vs 13.04% 9/69); P < .001). The pathogen most prevalent was methicillin susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) (ORT 33.3% (9/27) vs SOC 46.4% (32/69)). Clinical failure occurred in 7.4% (2/27) in the ORT group and 17.4% (12/69) in SOC (P = .34). No components of the primary outcome were significantly different between groups, but AKI did occur more commonly in the SOC group (27.5% (19/69) vs 3.7% (1/27); P = .01). Conclusions: ORT appears to be a safe and effective option when directly compared to the SOC for non-endocarditis BSIs.

The Clinical Efficacy of Multidose Oritavancin: A Systematic Review.

Oritavancin (ORI) is a semisynthetic lipoglycopeptide approved as a single 1200 mg dose intravenous infusion for the treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSIs) caused by Gram-positive organisms in adults. The pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) linear kinetic profile and long terminal half-life (~393 h) of ORI make it therapeutically attractive for the treatment of other Gram-positive infections for which prolonged therapy is needed. Multidose regimens are adopted in real-world clinical practice with promising results, but aggregated efficacy data are still lacking. A comprehensive search on PubMed/Medline, Scopus, Cochrane and Google Scholar databases was performed to include papers published up to the end of January 2023. All articles on ORI multiple doses usage, including case reports, with quantitative data and relevant clinical information were included. Two reviewers independently assessed papers against the inclusion/exclusion criteria and for methodological quality. Differences in opinion were adjudicated by a third party. From 1751 potentially relevant papers identified by this search, a total of 16 studies met the inclusion criteria and were processed further in the final data analysis. We extracted data concerning clinical response, bacteriologic response, mortality and adverse events (AEs). From the 16 included papers, 301 cases of treatment with multidose ORIs were identified. Multidose regimens comprised an initial ORI dose of 1200 mg followed by 1200 mg or 800 mg subsequent doses with a varying total number and frequency of reinfusions. The most often treated infections and isolates were osteomyelitis (148; 54.4%), ABSSSI (35; 12.9%) and cellulitis (14; 5.1%); and MRSA (121), MSSA (66), CoNS (17), E. faecalis (13) and E. faecium (12), respectively. Clinical cure and improvement by multidose ORI regimens were observed in 85% (231/272) and 8% (22/272) patients, respectively. Multidose ORI was safe and well tolerated; the most frequent AEs were infusion-related reactions and hypoglycemia. A multidose ORI regimen may be beneficial in treating other Gram-positive infections besides ABSSSIs, with a good safety profile. Further studies are warranted to ascertain the superiority of one multidose ORI scheme or posology over the other.

Oritavancin in vitro activity against Gram-positive organisms from European medical centers: a 10-year longitudinal overview from the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program (2010-2019).

To assess oritavancin in vitro activity against clinically relevant Gram-positive pathogens in European (EU) hospitals, a total of 51,531 consecutive and unique clinical isolates collected in 2010-2019 were evaluated. All isolates were tested by CLSI broth microdilution methods. The key resistance phenotypes differed considerably between Eastern Europe (E-EU) and Western Europe (W-EU), respectively: methicillin-resistant (MR) Staphylococcus aureus 27.7%/22.9%; multidrug resistant (MDR) S. aureus, 19.7%/15.2%; MR coagulase-negative staphylococci, 77.3%/61.9%; vancomycin-resistant enterococci (E. faecium), 44.2%/20.9%; and MDR E. faecium, 63.8%/55.4%. There were no substantive differences in oritavancin minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values for the different species/organism groups over time or by EU region. Oritavancin inhibited 99.9% and 99.1% of all S. aureus and coagulase-negative staphylococci at 0.12 mg/L, respectively, and all isolates of E. faecalis and E. faecium at ≤0.5 mg/L. Oritavancin susceptibility rates against ß-hemolytic and Viridans group streptococci isolates were 98.1% and 99.4%, respectively. Oritavancin had potent activity in vitro against this contemporary collection of European Gram-positive isolates from 2010 to 2019.

Ampicillin-resistant and vancomycin-susceptible Enterococcus faecium bacteremia: a clinical narrative review.

INTRODUCTION: Enterococcus faecium is a commensal microorganism that can cause infections such as bacteremia. Incidence of ampicillin-resistant and vancomycin-susceptible E. faecium (EfARSV) bacteremia is on the rise, and the mortality rate is high. Despite much data, the most appropriate treatment remains a question. AREAS COVERED: This article mostly reviews the relevant aspects of EfARSV bacteremia: microbiology, gastrointestinal tract colonization and invasion, antibiotic resistance, epidemiology, risk factors, mortality, and treatment, including pharmacologic components of employed agents and related clinical evidence. A literature search was conducted on PubMed on 31 July 2022, which was updated on 15 November 2022. EXPERT OPINION: EfARSV bacteremia presents high mortality. However, it is uncertain whether mortality is attributable to or a marker of severity/comorbidities. Considering its antibiotic resistance pattern, EfARSV is considered a difficult-to-treat microorganism. Glycopeptides have been used to treat EfARSV, with linezolid and daptomycin serving as potential alternative agents. Yet, the use of daptomycin is controversial due to a higher risk of treatment failures. Clinical evidence on this issue is scarce, unfortunately, and subject to many limitations. Despite increased incidence and mortality, EfARSV bacteremia presents multiple aspects to be addressed in well-conducted studies.

Dalbavancin vs standard of care for Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia in patients unable to receive outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy.

BACKGROUND: This study compared dalbavancin with standard of care (SOC) for patients with Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia (SAB) who were unable to receive outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT). METHODS: This retrospective cohort compared re-admission rates related to the index infection between patients treated with dalbavancin or SOC for SAB. Patients aged ≥18 years seen by the infectious diseases consult service who had received at least one dose of dalbavancin or at least 1 week of SOC parenteral antibacterials as directed therapy for SAB at the time of discharge were included. The SOC group consisted of patients transferred from the main hospital to one of the post-acute care facilities to complete parenteral antibacterials. The primary outcome was re-admission rate within 30 days of completion of therapy. Secondary outcomes included re-admission rate within 90 days of completion of therapy and adherence to the antibacterial regimen. RESULTS: Twenty-seven patients received dalbavancin and 27 patients received SOC. Baseline demographics were comparable between groups, although more patients in the SOC group had indwelling prostheses or hardware (4% vs 22%). The majority of SAB was caused by methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (56% vs 59%). Re-admission rates for the dalbavancin group were similar to those for the SOC group within 30 days (15% vs 22%; P=0.484) and 90 days (19% vs 22%; P=0.735) of completion of therapy. Adherence to the antibacterial regimen was significantly higher among patients treated with dalbavancin compared with SOC (85% vs 44%; P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Dalbavancin offers similar clinical outcomes to SOC for patients with SAB who are unable to receive OPAT.

Role of Oritavancin in the Treatment of Infective Endocarditis, Catheter- or Device-Related Infections, Bloodstream Infections, and Bone and Prosthetic Joint Infections in Humans: Narrative Review and Possible Developments.

Oritavancin is a long-acting lipoglycopeptide with in vitro activity against Gram-positive pathogens, as well as good bactericidal activity and sterilisation ability in biofilm. It has been approved for acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSI), but recent reports have demonstrated possible off-label uses, such as for vancomycin resistant enterococci (VRE), deep-seated infections including those involving prosthetic material and invasive infections. The aim of this work is to review the uses of oritavancin outside of ABSSSI, focusing on its real-life applications on infective endocarditis, catheter- or device-related infections, bloodstream infections, and bone and prosthetic joint infections in humans, as well as possible future applications. We performed a narrative review, collecting the literature published between 1 December 2002 and 1 November 2022 on PubMed and the Cochrane Library using the term 'oritavancin'. Available studies have shown how effective it is in different settings, suggesting an opportunity for step-down strategies or outpatient management of infections requiring a long duration of antibiotic treatment. So far, evidence is still scarce, and limited to a few studies and case reports, mostly focusing on Staphylococcus aureus as the major isolate. Concerns about fluid intake for dilution and interaction with coagulation markers also need to be taken into account. Further studies are required in order to assess the safety and effectiveness of Oritavancin in vascular, prosthetic, or device-related infections, as well as in resistant Gram-positive bacteria or enterococcal infections.