Follicular challenge test to predict suboptimal response to gonadotropin releasing hormone agonist trigger in elective oocyte cryopreservation cycles.

This prospective study aimed to test the ability of follicular GnRH agonist challenge test (FACT) to predict suboptimal response to GnRH agonist trigger, assessed by LH levels post ovulation trigger in non-medical oocyte cryopreservation program. The study included 91 women that underwent non-medical fertility preservation. On day two to menstrual cycle, blood tests were drawn (basal Estradiol, basal FSH, basal LH, Progesterone) and ultrasound (US) was performed. On that evening, the women were instructed to inject 0.2 mg GnRH agonist (FACT) and arrive for repeated blood workup 10-12 h later in the next morning, followed by a flexible antagonist protocol. LH levels on the morning after ovulation trigger were compared to FACT LH levels. The results demonstrated that LH levels following agonist ovulation trigger below 15IU/L occurred in 1.09% of cycles and were predicted by FACT, r = 0.57, p < 0.001. ROC analysis demonstrated that FACT LH > 42.70 IU/L would predict LH post trigger of more than 30 IU/L with 75% sensitivity and 70% specificity, AUC = 0.81. LH levels post trigger also displayed significant positive correlation to basal FSH (r = 0.35, p = 0.002) and basal LH (r = 0.54, p < 0.001). LH levels post ovulation trigger were not associated with total oocytes number or maturity rate. The strongest correlation to the number of frozen oocytes was progesterone levels post agonist trigger (r = 0.746, p < 0.001). We concluded that suboptimal response to agonist trigger, as assessed by post trigger LH levels was a rare event. FACT could serve as an adjunct pre-trigger, intracycle tool to predict adequate LH levels elevation after agonist ovulation trigger. Future studies should focus on optimization of agonist trigger efficacy assessment and prediction, especially in high responders.

A follicular volume of >0.56 cm3 at trigger is the cutoff to predict oocyte maturity: a starting point for novel volume-based triggering criteria.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the minimum follicular volume on the day of trigger that will correspond to a mature oocyte at egg retrieval by individualized follicular puncture and to calculate the mean follicular growth from ovulation induction to egg retrieval using SonoAVCfollicle. DESIGN: A prospective observational study of 53 women undergoing in vitro fertilization, in which it was possible to identify unequivocally one or more follicles at trigger and egg retrieval using three-dimensional ultrasound. SETTING: University-affiliated private in vitro fertilization center. PATIENTS: The final sample included 206 follicles from 14 oocyte donors and 39 patients. INTERVENTIONS: A three-dimensional ultrasound with SonoAVCfollicle was performed at trigger and egg retrieval. The same operator selected follicles that were identified easily on both scans and verified that they were apt to be aspirated individually. Follicles were punctured individually, recording the real aspirated volume and the maturity stage of the oocyte. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was the relationship between follicular volume on the day of the trigger and the oocyte maturity stage. The secondary outcome was the rate of follicular growth from the day of trigger to the day of oocyte retrieval, as measured using SonoAVCfollicle. RESULTS: On the day of trigger 206, follicles were selected. Of these, 5 could not be identified on the day of oocyte retrieval, probably because of follicular rupture (mean volume: 4 cm3, range: 2-7 cm3), and in 48, an oocyte was not obtained. The relationship between follicular volume and oocyte maturity was studied in 153 follicles: 125 (82%) contained mature and 28 (18%) contained immature oocytes. Receiver operating characteristic curves showed an area under the curve value of 0.73 (95% confidence interval: 0.65-0.80). A follicular volume of >0.56 cm3 is the cutoff point, with the highest Youden index having a sensitivity of 85% and a specificity of 64% to predict oocyte maturity. The mean follicular growth from trigger to egg retrieval was 26%-50% in 53% of cases. CONCLUSION: A follicular volume of >0.56 cm3 at trigger is the cutoff point with the optimal balance between sensitivity and specificity for oocyte maturity. Follicles of >2-3 cm3 may undergo spontaneous rupture before egg retrieval. Given these findings, we propose new volume-based criteria for trigger: 70% of follicles of >0.6 cm3 and dominant follicles between 2 and 3 cm3. These findings need validation by randomized controlled trials.

Comparison between hCG and GnRH Agonist for Ovulation Trigger in GnRH Antagonist In-Vitro Fertilization Cycles in a Tertiary Hospital in Malaysia: An observational study.

OBJECTIVE: hCG is commonly used as an ovulation trigger in IVF. Its usage is associated with OHSS. GnRH agonist is an alternative to hCG and is associated with reduced incidence of OHSS. This study compared the cycle outcomes of GnRH agonists with hCG as an ovulation trigger in IVF cycles. METHODS: The medical notes of 209 IVF cycles receiving GnRH agonist and hCG as ovulation trigger over 18 months were reviewed in this retrospective study. The number and quality of mature oocytes, the number and quality of embryos, pregnancy rates, and outcomes were compared using Independent T-test or One-way ANOVA for normal distribution. The Mann-Whitney test or Kruskal-Wallis test was used for not normally distributed. p<0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: The cycle outcomes of 107 GnRH agonist-trigger and 102 hCG-trigger were compared. The MII oocytes retrieved and 2PN count was significantly higher in the GnRH agonist trigger group (p<0.001). Clinical pregnancy rate and ongoing pregnancy were higher in the GnRH agonist trigger group but were not statistically significant. The GnRH agonist trigger group was associated with low OHSS than the hCG trigger group (n=2(1.9%) and n=12(11.8%) respectively, p=0.004). CONCLUSION: GnRH agonist trigger is an option as a final maturation trigger in high-responder women undergoing IVF or ICSI cycles.

Real-world practices of hormone monitoring during ovarian stimulation in assisted reproductive technology: a global online survey.

Objective: The aim of this study is to understand the global practice of routine hormonal monitoring (HM) during ovarian stimulation (OS) in the context of assisted reproductive technique (ART) treatment. Methods: An open-access questionnaire was available to 3,845 members of IVF-Worldwide.com from September 8 to October 13, 2021. The survey comprised 25 multiple-choice questions on when and how ultrasound (US) and hormone tests were conducted during ovarian stimulation OS. For most questions, respondents were required to select a single option. Some questions allowed the selection of multiple options. Results: In all, 528 (13.7%) members from 88 countries responded to the questionnaire. Most respondents (98.9%) reported using US to monitor OS cycles. HM was used by 79.5% of respondents during any of the cycle monitoring visits and was most commonly performed on the day of, or a day prior to final oocyte maturation. Overall, 87% of respondents claimed adjusting the dose of gonadotropin during OS, with 61.7% adjusting the dose based on hormonal levels. Oestradiol (E2) was the most frequently monitored hormone during all visits and was used by 74% of respondents for the prediction of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS). On or a day prior to ovulation triggering (OT), the number of respondents who measured progesterone increased from 34.3% in the second/third visit to 67.7%. Approximately one-third of respondents measured luteinizing hormone during all visits. Conclusion: Globally, most ART specialists (~80%) use HM, along with US, for monitoring OS, especially for the prevention of OHSS.

Time-sensitive assessment of luteal phase progesterone after HCG ovulation triggering: another brick off the wall?

In recent years, there has been growing interest in understanding the dynamics of progesterone levels during the luteal phase after HCG-triggered ovulation. Recent studies have provided data showing a deviation from the natural ovulatory cycle, with peak progesterone concentrations occurring earlier and declining steadily thereafter, demonstrating that a fall in progesterone concentration early in the luteal phase was associated with lower rates of ongoing pregnancy. These findings highlight the importance of changes in progesterone concentration, rather than absolute concentrations, in determining optimal endometrial conditions. The disadvantages of HCG triggering, including the lack of a natural FSH surge and asynchronization between embryo age and endometrium receptivity, can be addressed by using gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) triggering. GnRHa triggering induces both LH and FSH surges, ensures appropriate progesterone concentrations and offers flexibility in manipulating the luteal phase. Transitioning to GnRHa triggering could improve infertility treatment.

The effect of gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist versus human chorionic gonadotrophin trigger on pregnancy and neonatal outcomes in Letrozole-HMG IUI cycles.

BACKGROUND: GnRHa and hCG are both used for oocyte maturation and ovulation triggering. However, GnRHa have a shorter half-life than hCG, which leads to luteal phase deficiency. Letrozole (LE) has been found to improve the luteal function. Thus, the choice of triggering strategy can be different in intrauterine insemination (IUI) cycles using LE and human menopausal gonadotropin (HMG). The aim of this study was to compare the pregnancy and neonatal outcomes of patients triggered with GnRHa versus hCG versus dual trigger in LE-IUI cycles. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included 6,075 LE-HMG IUI cycles between January 2010 and May 2021 at a tertiary-care academic medical center in China. All cycles were divided into three groups according to different trigger strategies as hCG trigger group, GnRHa trigger group and dual trigger group. The primary outcome was clinical pregnancy rate. Logistic regression analysis was performed to explore other risk factors for clinical pregnancy rate. RESULTS: No significant difference was observed in clinical pregnancy rate between hCG, GnRHa and dual trigger cycles in LE-HMG IUI cycles (P = 0.964). The miscarriage rate was significantly lower in the GnRHa trigger group, and higher in the dual trigger group, compared with the hCG group (P = 0.045). Logistic analysis confirmed that triggering strategy was associated with miscarriage (aOR:0.427, 95%CI: 0.183-0.996, P = 0.049; aOR:0.298, 95%CI: 0.128-0.693, P = 0.005). No significant differences were observed regarding neonatal outcomes between the three groups. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggested that both GnRHa and dual trigger can be used to trigger ovulation in LE-HMG IUI cycles, but dual trigger must be used with caution.

Stimulation Duration in Patients with Early Oocyte Maturation Triggering Criteria Does Not Impact IVF-ICSI Outcomes.

Results from studies reporting the optimal stimulation duration of IVF-ICSI cycles are inconsistent. The aim of this study was to determine whether, in the presence of early ovulation-triggering criteria, prolonged ovarian stimulation modified the chances of a live birth. This cross-sectional study included 312 women presenting triggering criteria beginning from D8 of ovarian stimulation. Among the 312 women included in the study, 135 were triggered for ovulation before D9 (D ≤ nine group) and 177 after D9 (D > nine group). The issues of fresh +/− frozen embryo transfers were taken into consideration. Cumulative clinical pregnancy and live-birth rates after fresh +/− frozen embryo transfers were similar in both groups (37% versus 46.9%, p = 0.10 and 19.3% versus 28.2%, p = 0.09, respectively). No patient characteristics were found to be predictive of a live birth depending on the day of ovulation trigger. Postponing of ovulation trigger did not impact pregnancy or live-birth rates in early responders. A patient's clinical characteristics should not influence the decision process of ovulation trigger day in early responders. Further prospective studies should be conducted to support these findings.

Association of raised serum progesterone level with ovulation trigger and histology of endometrium in stimulated cycles

Abstract This was a forthcoming study of those patients, who undergo in-vitro fertilization (IVF) and freeze-all embryo, who acquiesce for the study. The number of participated patients (n=350) in this study, underwent for IVF. The blood sample was collected from patients to evaluate the level of serum progesterone in vacuum vials on the day of ovulation trigger. After 36 hrs of ovulation trigger, ovum picked up was done. Quantitative methods were used to estimate the level of serum progesterone through the electrochemiluminescence immunoassay and correlation of serum progesterone with embryo transfer (ET) outcomes. Main outcome of this current study was to evaluate the value of mean serum progesterone level i.e.0.868± 0.712 ng/ml and 0.88±0.723 ng/ml was found in case of pregnancy positive and negative respectively, at p=0.216 value. In antagonist (n=40) and agonist (n=310) cases, it was 8(20%) and 37(11.94%) PL occurrence was noted at p=0.143 respectively. An overall value of the premature lutenization (PL) occurrences was 13.63% and 15.25% observed in both positive and negative cases of pregnancy at p=0.216 respectively. This study concluded that 12.66% of PL occurrences were recorded in the case of IVF. Study results proved, there were no significant effect of PL on pregnancy outcomes.

To Compare the Effect of GnRH Agonist versus Human Chorionic Gonadotropin (HCG) Trigger on Clinical Pregnancy Rate in Intrauterine Insemination Cycle.

CONTEXT: Gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist trigger mimics the natural surge more closely with both luteinizing hormone (LH) and follicle-stimulating hormone surge. The present study attempts to find whether this apparent physiological advantage translates into the better pregnancy rate. AIMS: To compare the effect of GnRH agonist versus human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) trigger on the clinical pregnancy rate (CPR) in infertile women undergoing intrauterine insemination (IUI) with oral ovulogens. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: Retrospective analysis at a tertiary care in vitro fertilization center. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The records of 280 infertile women, who underwent IUI with oral ovulogens were analyzed. Women who received 0.2 mg triptorelin (GnRH agonist (GnRHa)) as trigger were categorised in Group A (n = 129) and those who received 10,000 IU urinary hCG in Group B (n = 151). The outcome in terms of CPR was studied. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: The quantitative variables were compared using the independent t-test/Mann-Whitney test. The qualitative variables were compared using the Chi-square test. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: There was a trend toward better CPR in Group A (21/129 - 16.28%) than in Group B (16/151 - 10.60%), although the difference was not found to be statistically significant (P - 0.162). CONCLUSIONS: There was a trend toward better CPR with the use of GnRH agonist trigger in IUI cycles with oral ovulogens in comparison to hCG trigger, although the difference was not found to be statistically significant. Further randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm these findings.

GnRH-Agonist Ovulation Trigger in Patients Undergoing Controlled Ovarian Hyperstimulation for IVF with Stop GnRH-Agonist Combined with Multidose GnRH-Antagonist Protocol.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to characterize those patients undergoing the stop gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH)-agonist combined with multidose GnRH-antagonist protocol, with suboptimal response to GnRH-agonist trigger in in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles. DESIGN: This is a cohort study. SETTING: The study was conducted in a university hospital. PATIENTS: All consecutive women admitted to our IVF unit from February 2020 through November 2020 who reached the ovum pick-up stage were reviewed. INTERVENTIONS: Triggering final oocyte maturation by GnRH-ag alone (GnRH-ag trigger group), or combined with hCG (dual trigger group), in patients undergoing the stop GnRH-agonist combined with multidose GnRH-antagonist protocol was performed. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The main outcome measure was LH level 12 h after the trigger. RESULTS: Five out of the 32 patients (15.6%) demonstrated suboptimal response as reflected by LH levels <15 IU/L 12 h after GnRH-agonist trigger. Moreover, while no differences were observed in oocyte recovery rate, maturity, or embryo quality between the different study groups (GnRH-ag trigger and dual trigger groups), those achieving a suboptimal response to the GnRH-agonist trigger (post-trigger LH <15 mIU/mL) demonstrated significantly higher number of follicles and peak estradiol levels at the day of trigger, compared to those with optimal response (post-trigger LH >15 mIU/mL). CONCLUSIONS: The stop GnRH-agonist combined with GnRH-antagonist protocol enables the substitution of hCG with GnRH-ag for final oocyte maturation. However, caution should be taken in high responders, where the dual trigger with small doses of hCG (1,000-1,500 IU) should be considered, aiming to avoid suboptimal response (post-trigger LH levels <15 IU/L).

Oocyte stimulation parameters influence the number and proportion of mature oocytes retrieved in assisted reproductive technology cycles.

PURPOSE: Whether differences in stimulation parameters alter the number and proportion of MII oocytes retrieved. METHODS: Records of 2546 patients were examined, looking at age, day 2/3 follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) and estradiol (E2) levels, total dose of gonadotropins administered (including FSH and human menopausal gonadotropin [hMG]), fraction of hMG administered, number of days of treatment with gonadotropins, and the dose of gonadotropins administered per day. We segregated the patients into 3 different classes depending on the trigger method used and 2 groups based on egg freeze vs. ICSI. Multiple regression methods were used to examine associations between stimulation parameters and the total number of eggs, number of immature oocytes (Poisson regression), and the fraction of retrieved oocytes that were immature (Logistic regression). RESULTS: After adjustments for different triggers and egg freeze versus ICSI, both the #immature oocytes and the immature fraction of oocytes were associated with the total gonadotropin dose (inversely) and the gonadotropin dose/day (positively). Other parameters were associated with the number of immature oocytes but were also associated with the number of oocytes retrieved. CONCLUSIONS: Stimulations using less total gonadotropin and more gonadotropin per day were associated with more immaturity. The type of trigger method used for final maturation was associated with immaturity but was believed to be predominantly due to trigger assignment to patients based on response. The association between use of ICSI and less immaturity was believed to be due to additional time for maturation in the ICSI group.

Triggering change in stimulation protocols: a matter of oocyte maturation and beyond.

Since the birth of Louise Brown, in vitro fertilization (IVF) stimulation protocols have evolved significantly. One particular area of focus has been the process of final oocyte maturation, during which the oocyte gains competence to support fertilization and early embryonic development up to implantation. The field of human assisted reproductive technology (ART) is witnessing increased utilization of GnRH agonists (GnRHa) as trigger agents, in addition to or instead of the traditionally used human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG). Future translational studies will reveal whether oocyte developmental competence, as reflected in live birth outcomes, are not only non-inferior, but also superior with the use of GnRHa as a trigger for both nuclear and cytoplasmic oocyte maturation.

Embryo Morphokinetics and Blastocyst Development After GnRH Agonist versus hCG Triggering in Normo-ovulatory Women: a Secondary Analysis of a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial.

Gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) for final oocyte maturation, along with vitrification of all usable embryos followed by transfer in a subsequent frozen-thawed cycle, is the most effective strategy to avoid ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS). However, less is known about the ovulation induction triggers effect on early embryo development and blastocyst formation. This study is a secondary analysis of a multicenter, randomized controlled trial, with the aim to compare embryo development in normo-ovulatory women, randomized to GnRHa or human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) trigger. In all, 4056 retrieved oocytes were observed, 1998 from the GnRHa group (216 women) and 2058 from the hCG group (218 women). A number of retrieved oocytes, mature and fertilized oocytes, and high-quality embryos and blastocysts were similar between the groups. A sub-analysis in 250 women enrolled at the main trial site including 2073 oocytes was conducted to compare embryo morphokinetics and cleavage patterns with EmbryoScope time-lapse system. In total, 1013 oocytes were retrieved from the GnRHa group (124 women) and 1060 oocytes were retrieved from the hCG group (126 women). Morphokinetic parameters and cleavage patterns were comparable between the groups. However, embryos derived from the GnRHa group were less likely to perform rolling during their development than the embryos from the hCG trigger group (OR = 0.41 (95%CI 0.25; 0.67), p-value 0.0003). The comparable results on embryo development and utilization rates between the GnRHa and hCG triggers is of clinical relevance to professionals and infertile patients, when GnRHa trigger and freeze-all is performed to avoid OHSS development. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02746562.

Is oocyte maturity influenced by ovulation trigger type in oocyte donation cycles?

The aim of this study was to compare clinical and laboratory outcomes between GnRHa, dual and HCG triggers in altruistic oocyte donation cycles. Normal or high responders were given either gonadotropin releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) or a dual trigger of GnRHa and a low dose of human chorionic gonadotropin (HCG). Low responders were given HCG trigger. In 333 cycles, 232 (69.7%) received GnRHa trigger, 59 (17.7%) received dual trigger and 42 (12.6%) had HCG trigger. The total number of mature oocytes retrieved and cryopreserved were significantly higher in the GnRHa and dual trigger groups, compared to the HCG group (p < 0.001). However, the ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) rate was significantly higher in the dual trigger group (n = 5 (8.5%)), compared to the GnRH agonist (n = 1 (0.4%)) and HCG groups (n = 0 (0%)) (p = 0.001). GnRHa trigger maximises mature oocyte yields in oocyte donors suspected of normal and high response but offers a significant reduction in OHSS risk compared to dual trigger. As such, dual trigger should not be used in oocyte donation. HCG trigger can also be used with a very low risk of OHSS at low risk of OHSS in carefully selected donors where GnRHa is unlikely to be effective.

GnRH triggering may improve euploidy and live birth rate in hyper-responders: a retrospective cohort study.

PURPOSE: Despite the increasing use of GnRHa to trigger final oocyte maturation in segmented IVF cycles, the effects of trigger modality on chromosomal competence and embryo quality remain controversial. Hence, the purpose of this study was to compare euploidy rates and pregnancy outcomes among hyper-responding women using hCG versus GnRHa trigger. METHODS: This retrospective study included 333 hyper-responders, defined as >15 oocytes retrieved, who underwent preimplantation genetic testing (PGT-A) in segmented IVF cycles using either GnRHa or urinary hCG trigger. Live birth rate (LBR) was the primary outcome of interest. Implantation rate (IR), clinical pregnancy rate (CPR), and euploidy rate were secondary outcomes. RESULTS: GnRH triggering was associated with improved IR (70.5 vs. 53.2%, p = 0.0475), LBR (51.3 vs. 33.8%, p = 0.0170) compared to hCG. A greater number of oocytes were retrieved (21.9 vs 18.4%, p < 0.001) and euploid embryos produced (2.8 vs. 2.1, p = 0.0109) after GnRHa triggering, while higher euploidy rates were only observed among women <35-years-old (62.0 vs. 51.7%, p = 0.0307) using GnRHa trigger. Higher OHSS rates were observed after hCG triggering (10.6 vs. 2.1%, p = 0.0009). CONCLUSION: Hyper-responders who received GnRHa trigger experienced improved pregnancy outcomes and lower rates of OHSS compared to hCG triggering. The higher number of oocytes retrieved and euploid embryos produced may reflect an improved developmental competence using GnRHa triggering due to physiologic induction of both LH and FSH surge or other undefined mechanisms that improve embryo development. However, higher overall euploid rates were only observed among women <35-years-old using the GnRHa trigger. Further prospective studies are required to validate this observation and evaluate the specific influence of different ovulation triggers on gamete developmental competence among hyper-responder women.

The ovulation trigger-OPU time interval of different ovarian protocols in ART: a retrospective study.

PURPOSE: To explore the trends of oocyte and pregnancy outcomes over the ovulation trigger-OPU (oocyte pickup) time interval in four mainly used COH protocols. METHODS: This retrospective study was conducted between January 2013 and July 2018. The IVF/ICSI cycles of the patients with normal ovarian reserve were included. The number of total patients was 4673, which consisted of long agonist protocol (n = 819), short agonist protocol (n = 1703), mild stimulation protocol (n = 1627), and GnRH antagonist protocol (n = 524). The primary outcome was mature oocyte rate. RESULTS: The ovulation trigger-OPU time interval and COH protocol were related to cycles with > 80% MII oocytes. Four protocols showed apparently different trends of retrieved oocyte rate and mature oocyte rate over the ovulation trigger-OPU time interval, and the long agonist protocol had the most delayed time interval than other three COH protocols in retrieving more than 60% oocytes (35.4-39.6 h vs. 34.6-38.6 h vs. 32.5-37.5 h vs. 33.8-37.7 h) and getting more than 80% mature oocytes (35.0-39.7 h vs. 36.0-37.7 h vs. 34.1-35.5 h vs. 34.5-36.3 h). And the adjusted odds ratio (OR) of the cumulative live birth rate (CLBR) (OR 1.360, 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 1.156-1.549, P < 0.05) significantly increased with the trigger-OPU time interval in the long agonist protocol. CONCLUSIONS: For getting more and mature oocytes, the ovulation trigger-OPU time intervals should be gradually prolonged from the mild stimulation protocol, the GnRH antagonist protocol, and the short protocol to the long agonist protocol. And the prolonged ovulation trigger-OPU time interval in the long agonist protocol brings higher live birth rate (LBR) and CLBR.

Gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist for ovulation trigger - OHSS prevention and use of modified luteal phase support for fresh embryo transfer.

The introduction of gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) trigger greatly impacted modern IVF treatment. Patients at low risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) development, undergoing fresh embryo transfer and GnRHa trigger can be offered a virtually OHSS-free treatment with non-inferior reproductive outcomes by using a modified luteal phase support in terms of small boluses of human chorionic gonadotrophin (hCG), daily recombinant luteinizing hormone LH (rLH) or GnRHa. In the OHSS risk patient, GnRHa trigger can safely be performed, followed by a 'freeze-all' policy with a minimal risk of OHSS development and high live birth rates in the subsequent frozen embryo transfer cycle. Importantly, GnRHa trigger opened the 'black box' of the luteal phase, promoting research in the most optimal steroid levels during the luteal phase. GnRHa trigger allows high-dose gonadotropin stimulation to achieve the optimal number of oocytes and embryos needed to ensure the highest chance of live birth. This review thoroughly discusses how the GnRHa trigger concept adds safety and efficacy to modern IVF in terms of OHSS prevention. Furthermore, the optimal luteal phase management after GnRHa trigger in fresh embryo transfer cycles is discussed.

Gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist ovulation trigger-beyond OHSS prevention.

In this review the advantages of the gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) trigger are discussed beyond those immediately associated with ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) prevention. The GnRHa trigger concept has sparked the development of novel protocols, enriching the assisted reproductive technology (ART) armamentarium for the benefit of present and future patients. Thus, GnRHa trigger already has a pivotal role, not only for the standard in vitro fertilisation (IVF) patient, but also for patient groups like oocyte donors, cancer patients, patients with poor ovarian reserve, and patients with immature oocyte syndrome and empty follicle syndrome. Herein, we discuss the importance of the GnRHa-elicited midcycle FSH surge and the potential improvement in oocyte yield and embryo competence.

Optimal Ovulation Trigger-Oocyte Pickup Interval in Progestin-Primed Ovarian Stimulation Protocol: A Retrospective Study Using Propensity Score Matching.

Background: To investigate the optimal ovulation trigger-oocyte pickup (OPU) interval of a progestin-primed ovarian stimulation (PPOS) protocol. Method: Patients with normal ovarian reserve in their first PPOS OPU cycle were enrolled in this retrospective cohort study between July 2013 and April 2018. This retrospective cohort study included two parts. In part I, we studied the regression trend of mature oocyte rate, implantation rate, and live birth rate within the whole ovulation trigger-OPU interval of 7,258 patients. To homogenize some clinical characters that were key regulators of OPU time, in part II, we used propensity score matching to auto-select patients among trigger-OPU interval group 1 (35.6-36.4 h), group 2 (36.4-37.1 h), and group 3 (37.1-37.8 h) and analyzed clinical outcomes. Results: Study part I showed that the whole ovulation trigger-OPU interval (33-39.5 h) of PPOS protocol had a trend of a high mature oocyte rate (>80%), increasing implantation rate, and high live birth rate. Propensity score matching of patients with homogeneous clinical characteristics further indicated that the trigger-OPU interval within groups 2 and 3 (36.4-37.8 h) had significantly higher mature oocyte rates (84.54% vs. 84.60% vs. 82.34%, P = 0.002) and implantation rates (34.17% vs. 34.37% vs. 29.61%, P < 0.05) than group 1. The same tend was observed in the live birth rate. Conclusions: The ovulation trigger-OPU interval of 36.4-37.8 h is optimal for most patients using a PPOS protocol.

Nppc/Npr2/cGMP signaling cascade maintains oocyte developmental capacity.

The follicle must fulfill the following criteria if it is to survive the period between early embryonic life and the luteinizing hormone (LH) peak. It should (i) be surrounded by pregranulosa cells; (ii) complete the first meiotic division and become dormant; and (iii) continue metabolism during the dormant stage. Interaction between the natriuretic peptide precursor type C (Nppc) and its receptor, natriuretic peptide receptor 2 (Npr2), affects female fertility through the production of oocytes with developmental capacity and maintain oocyte meiotic arrest. While Nppc is expressed in mural cells, cumulus cells express Npr2. Nppc/Npr2 system exerts its biological function on developing follicles by increasing the production of intracellular cyclic guanosine monophosphate (cGMP). This pathway not only contributes to the development of ovary and the uterus, but aids the formation of healthy eggs in terms of their morphological and genetic aspects. A defect in this pathway leads to asmall ovarian size, string-like uterine horns, and thin endometrium and myometrium. Disorganized chromosomes, abnormal cumulus expansion and early meiotic resumption occur in animals with defective Nppc/Npr2 signaling. The types and number of oocytes also decrease when there is incompetent Nppc/Npr2 signaling. This paper extends on most recent and relevant experimental evidence regarding Nppc/Npr2/cGMP signaling with regard to its crucial role in maintaining oocyte meiotic arrest and the production of oocytes with developmental capacity. We further discuss whether the agonist or antagonist forms of the members of this exciting pathway can be usedfor triggering final oocyte maturation.