Cost-effectiveness analysis of microwave ablation versus robot-assisted partial nephrectomy for patients with small renal masses in Australia.

OBJECTIVES: Microwave ablation (MWA) has gained attention as a minimally invasive and safe alternative to surgical intervention for patients with small renal masses; however, its cost-effectiveness in Australia remains unclear. This study conducted a cost-effectiveness analysis to evaluate the relative clinical and economic merits of MWA compared to robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy (RA-PN) in the treatment of small renal masses. METHODS: A Markov state-transition model was constructed to simulate the progression of Australian patients with small renal masses treated with MWA versus RA-PN over a 10-year horizon. Transition probabilities and utility data were sourced from comprehensive literature reviews, and cost data were estimated from the Australian health system perspective. Life-years, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), and lifetime costs were estimated. Modelled uncertainty was assessed using both deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses. A willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of $50,000 per QALY was adopted. All costs are expressed in 2022 Australian dollars and discounted at 3% annually. To assess the broader applicability of our findings, a validated cost-adaptation method was employed to extend the analysis to 8 other high-income countries. RESULTS: Both the base case and cost-adaptation analyses revealed that MWA dominated RA-PN, producing both lower costs and greater effectiveness over 10 years. The cost-effectiveness outcome was robust across all model parameters. Probabilistic sensitivity analyses confirmed that MWA was dominant in 98.3% of simulations at the designated WTP threshold, underscoring the reliability of the model under varying assumptions. CONCLUSION: For patients with small renal masses in Australia and comparable healthcare settings, MWA is the preferred strategy to maximize health benefits per dollar, making it a highly cost-effective alternative to RA-PN.

Ultrasound-guided renal artery balloon catheter occluded hybrid partial nephrectomy (UBo-HPN) with branch renal artery occlusion: a single arm trial.

BACKGROUND: One key focus of partial nephrectomy is preserving renal function. Segmental renal artery occlusion with microdissection at the renal hilum confines ischemia, effectively reducing warm ischemic injury. Ultrasound-Guided Renal Artery Balloon Catheter Occluded Hybrid Partial Nephrectomy (UBo-HPN) can achieve branch occlusion without the need for dissecting the renal hilum. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the feasibility and safety of UBo-HPN of branch renal artery occlusion in the treatment of localized renal tumors. SUBJECT AND METHODS: A prospective single-arm analysis involving 20 patients with renal localized tumors underwent robot assisted UBo-HPN with branch renal artery occlusion from August 2021 to July 2023, with an average follow-up of 12 months. RESULTS: All patient was successfully operated on without conversion to conventional arterial clamping or radical nephrectomy. One case (5%) of minor complication occurred in the whole cohort, which was bruising around the puncture site. The mean total operative time was 95.8 min, with a mean operative time of 21.25 min for vascular intervention. The mean warm ischemia time was 20.35 min, and the median estimated blood loss was 50 ml. The median eGFR preservation percentage at postoperative 48 h, 30 days, and the latest follow-up were 87.52%, 91.47%, and 92.2%, respectively. After a median follow-up of 10.2 (2.3-19.2) months, no patients had radiological tumor recurrence or died from tumor-related causes. CONCLUSIONS: UBo-HPN with renal artery branch occlusion emerges as an efficient alternative to partial nephrectomy (PN), which achieved branch artery occlusion without dissecting the renal hilum. Long-term follow-up is expected for functional outcomes.

Robotic Partial Nephrectomy for Treating Renal Masses: Outcomes and Complications.

INTRODUCTION: Partial nephrectomy is the preferred treatment for renal tumors <7 cm. Robot-assisted laparoscopic approach is a minimally invasive method that offers advantages for resecting complex tumors. Here, we conducted a descriptive retrospective analysis of the first robotic partial nephrectomies (RPNs) performed at our center. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective cohort of 94 patients who consecutively underwent RPN at our center between November 2012 and December 2022 was investigated. Baseline patient data, tumor characteristics, intraoperative variables, pathological tumor analysis, and postoperative complications at 30 days were analyzed. RESULTS: The patients were followed up for a median of 25.3 months. Baseline values included a median age of 63 years and a median body mass index (BMI) of 28.1. Intraoperative variables comprised a median surgical time of 150 min and a median warm ischemia time of 16 min. The mean postoperative creatinine level was 1 mg/dL. The median tumor size was 41.9 mm, with a median PADUA score of 8 and a median RENAL score of 8. Resected tumors were predominantly cT1a (58.5%) and cT1b (39.3%), while the positive margin rate was 21.3%. A total of 19.2% of the patients experienced Clavien-Dindo complications, of which 11% were Clavien-Dindo I; 66.7%, Clavien-Dindo II; And 22.2%, Clavien-Dindo IIIb. However, no Clavien-Dindo IIIa or IV complications were reported. CONCLUSIONS: RPN is an effective and safe technique for treating solid renal masses, demonstrating a low complication rate and adequate oncologic control locally and distally.

Comparison of outcomes between single-port and multiport retroperitoneal robotic partial nephrectomy.

INTRODUCTION: Single-port (SP) robotic surgical system performs well in small anatomical spaces, which makes it suitable for retroperitoneal robotic partial nephrectomy (RPN). However, there is limited evidence comparing the safety and feasibility of SP RPN to multiport (MP) RPN. To address this gap in evidence, we sought to analyze and compare the safety of retroperitoneal RPN between SP and MP approaches. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study using data from the Single Port Advanced Research Consortium (SPARC) and a multicenter database of patients who underwent retroperitoneal RPN using either SP or MP between 2017 and 2023. Baseline, perioperative, and postoperative data were compared using t-tests, Mann-Whitney U test, χ2 test, and Fisher exact test. Multivariable analyses were conducted using robust and Poisson regressions. RESULTS: A total of 286 patients (SP RPN, n = 86 [30%]; MP RPN, n = 200 [70%]) underwent retroperitoneal RPN. R.E.N.A.L nephrometry score and tumor location were significantly different between the 2 groups. Notably, the ischemia time was significantly shorter in the MP group (16 vs. SP, 22 minutes, P < 0.001). Adjusting for baseline characteristics, the ischemia time was approximately 7.89 minutes longer for patients in the SP group compared to the MP group, on average (95% CI: 5.87, 9.92; P < 0.001). No significant differences were observed in operative time, EBL, blood transfusion, conversion rates, LOS, PSM, and overall 30-day postoperative complications between the 2 groups. CONCLUSION: Our study shows that retroperitoneal SP and MP RPN have comparable perioperative and postoperative outcomes, except for the longer ischemia time in the SP platform. SP RPN is a safe and viable alternative; however, further research is needed to explore its potential benefits, cost-effectiveness, and long-term oncologic outcomes.

Quantifying preserved renal volume and function in patients undergoing standard partial nephrectomy vs. tumor enucleation for localized renal tumors.

INTRODUCTION: Renal parenchymal volume loss from standard partial nephrectomy (SPN) is a significant prognosticator for postoperative renal function. Tumor enucleation (TE) minimizes parenchymal loss compared to SPN. Little is known regarding discrete changes in renal function associated with volume loss. We sought to quantify the differences between SPN and TE in preserving parenchymal volume and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). METHODS: We identified 420 patients who underwent robotic partial nephrectomy (SPN or TE) at our tertiary care center from 2009 to 2022. Parenchymal volumes were calculated using TeraRecon 3D reconstruction software from axial imaging performed preoperatively and within 6 months postoperatively. Renal volume preserved and renal function were evaluated with multivariable linear and logistic regression models. RESULTS: At 1 year, eGFR was 7% lower in patients undergoing SPN compared to TE (P < 0.01). Across both SPN and TE, only volume of preserved parenchyma was predictive of eGFR and chronic kidney disease (CKD) progression (both P < 0.01). TE preserved more healthy parenchymal volume compared to SPN (median percentage 97.6% vs 89.2%; P < 0.001). Each 1% of volumetric loss corresponded to a 0.35% decrease in eGFR at 1 year postoperatively (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Volume of preserved renal parenchyma was the strongest factor associated with preserved eGFR and reduced odds of CKD progression. TE preserved more parenchyma than SPN, which translated to higher eGFR preservation at 1 year postoperatively.

Intraoperative dexmedetomidine administration and acute kidney injury in patients undergoing unilateral partial nephrectomy: a retrospective study.

Partial nephrectomies are associated with an increased risk of acute kidney injury (AKI), but dexmedetomidine administration may improve renal outcomes. We hypothesized that intraoperative dexmedetomidine administration would be associated with a decrease in AKI development in patients undergoing unilateral partial nephrectomy. In this retrospective study, adult patients who underwent unilateral partial nephrectomy from April 2016 to October 2023 were included. Exclusion criteria were a history of end-stage renal disease, ineligible procedures (i.e., aborted procedure, conversion to radical nephrectomy, surgery on a horseshoe kidney), and reoperation within three days of the initial nephrectomy. Patients were categorized according to whether they received intraoperative dexmedetomidine. The primary outcome was AKI incidence within three days of surgery; AKI was defined according to the Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes definition. Propensity score matching (PSM) was conducted to account for potential confounders (age, body mass index, sex, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, final surgical approach, clamping-related ischemia for >15 min). We included 1,632 patients; 214 received dexmedetomidine and 1,418 did not. Before PSM, the AKI rate was 31.2% in patients who received dexmedetomidine and 25.7% in patients who did not (p = 0.081). After PSM, the AKI rate was 31.3% in patients who received dexmedetomidine and 27.6% in those who did not (p = 0.396). The post-PSM odds ratio for AKI following dexmedetomidine administration during unilateral partial nephrectomy was 0.910 (95% CI: 0.585-1.142; p = 0.677). Intraoperative dexmedetomidine was not associated with a reduction in postoperative AKI incidence or severity after unilateral partial nephrectomy.

Multivariate analysis of the parameters affecting the choice of surgical treatment for patients with localized renal cell carcinoma (RCC).

OBJECTIVE: to determine the key factors affecting the surgical treatment selection for patients with localized Renal-Cell Carcinoma (RCC) based on clinical and nephrometry data. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective cohort study to determine the key factors affecting the surgical treatment on a subset of patients with localized RCC (T1-T2) that underwent surgical treatment at primary investigational center from 2010 to 2017. Primary results were validated on the retrospective dataset of patients treated at high-volume referent center. Validation aimed to test applicability of the predictive model designed during primary analysis. To determine the relationship between the risks of radical or partial nephrectomy, the multivariate predictive modeling method was used. RESULTS: Based on the analysis, for polary and laterally located tumors, the risk of RN was conditioned only by remaining functioning parenchyma volume (RFPV). The average critical value of RFPV for polar lesions was = 58%; for lateral tumors = 67%. For medial location, the risk of RN only depended on the tumor size. Average critical value of the tumor size in the medial location was = 38mm. Based on the ROC curve comparison, there were no statistically significant differences between the predictive models containing 12 and 3 factors (AUCLin_12 and AUCMLP_3; P = 0.12); thus, the reduced amount of the factor indicators from 12 to 3 did not worsen the model predictive qualities. Designed during primary analysis hypothesis was successfully validated in a referent center on the cohort of 300 patients. Predictive model is characterized by high sensitivity (95.2%) and specificity (95.4%) in selecting patients for partial nephrectomy. CONCLUSIONS: For the polar and lateral tumor locations, the functioning parenchymal volumes of over 58 and 67% respectively serve as PN indications. However, for the medial lesions, the primary PN indication is a tumor size less than 38 mm.

A clinical study on 3D virtual model-assisted precise navigation for laparoscopic partial nephrectomy.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN) is a standard surgical treatment option for renal tumors. Prior to LPN, it is necessary to evaluate the tumor condition and develop a surgical plan using precise imaging. OBJECTIVE: To explore the clinical application value of 3D virtual model (3DVM) in LPN. METHODS: A total of 80 patients with renal tumor who underwent LPN were measured. Patients were divided into three cohorts (A, B, C) according to the difficulty of surgery. Each group was further divided into the test and control groups based on the application of preoperative 3DVM. Surgical safety and efficacy were assessed, and a questionnaire was developed to investigate the opinions of patients and physicians on 3DVM. RESULTS: The duration of LPN and intraoperative renal artery occlusion were significantly different between the test and control groups in both cohorts A and B (P< 0.05). In cohort C, the surgical duration, duration of intraoperative renal artery occlusion, length of stay, time to postoperative ambulation, intraoperative bleeding, incidence of postoperative bleeding were significantly between the two groups (P< 0.05). The analysis both of patients and physicians questionnaire scores were statistically significant (P< 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: 3DVM contributes to safer and more effective LPN. It benefits both doctors and patients.

Comparative efficacy of cryoablation versus robot-assisted partial nephrectomy in the treatment of cT1 renal tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: This study utilizes a meta-analytic approach to investigate the effects of cryoablation and robot-assisted partial nephrectomy on perioperative outcomes, postoperative renal function, and oncological results in patients. METHODS: This study followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. Four electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library database) were systematically searched to identify relevant studies published in English up to November 2023. The primary outcomes were perioperative results, complications, postoperative renal function and oncologic outcomes. Review Manager 5.4 was used for this analysis. RESULTS: This study included a total of 10 studies comprising 2,011 patients. Compared to RAPN (Robot-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy), the CA (Cryoablation) group had a shorter hospital stay [MD -1.76 days; 95% CI -3.12 to -0.41; p = 0.01], less blood loss [MD -104.60 ml; 95% CI -152.58 to -56.62; p < 0.0001], and fewer overall complications [OR 0.62; 95% CI 0.45 to 0.86; p = 0.004], but a higher recurrence rate [OR 7.83; 95% CI 4.32 to 14.19; p < 0.00001]. There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of operative time, minor complications (Clavien-Dindo Grade 1-2), major complications (Clavien-Dindo Grade 3-5), changes in renal function at 12 months post-operation, RFS (Recurrence-Free Survival), and OS (Overall Survival). CONCLUSION: The evidence provided by this meta-analysis indicates that the therapeutic effects of Cryoablation (CA) are similar to those of Robot-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy (RAPN) in terms of perioperative outcomes and renal function. However, the recurrence rate of tumors treated with CA is significantly higher. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: The study has been registered on the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO: CRD42023465846).

Race-modified estimated glomerular filtration rate underestimates chronic kidney disease prevalence in Black patients undergoing partial and radical nephrectomy: Implications for surgical planning.

Introduction: In estimated glomerular filtration rate equations (eGFR), the race multiplier (RM) yields greater eGFR values and may assign less severe chronic kidney disease (CKD) stages to black individuals. When deciding on appropriateness for partial nephrectomy (PN), patients with CKD are often considered a relative or absolute indication. We hypothesize that the eGFR RM may have ramifications for patients being counseled for radical nephrectomy (RN) versus PN to manage their renal tumor. Methods: We utilized prospective and retrospective, IRB-approved single-center databases to select patients who underwent PN or RN between 2016 and 2022. Demographics, preoperative risk factors, preoperative eGFR, and surgical management were collected. Descriptive statistics and two-tailed difference of proportion tests compared the percentage of patients with CKD who underwent nephrectomy. Results: This cohort included 1137 patients who underwent RN or PN, including 74 (6.5%) Black patients and 93.5% (n = 1063) non-Black patients. There was no statistically significant difference between the eGFR of Black and non-Black individuals using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease equation (P = 0.24) or Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration 2009 (CKD-EPI 2009) (P = 0.45); however, there was statistically significant difference in eGFR between sample populations when using CKD-EPI 2021 (P = 0.0055). Of the Black patient cohort, 16.2% of patients reclassified to a worse CKD class using CKD-EPI 2021, including 9.5% of Black patients reclassified to CKD3a or worse, and 14.6% of all patients (Black and non-Black) reclassified to a different CKD class under the CKD-EPI 2021 equation. Conclusions: There are quantitative differences in the evaluation of eGFR when utilizing different equations that may impact clinical considerations and health equity outcomes for nephrectomy across racial groups.

Comparison of outcomes of radical and partial nephrectomy for sarcomatoid renal cell carcinoma: analysis of the national cancer database.

PURPOSE: To compare outcomes of radical (RN) and partial nephrectomy (PN) in Sarcomatoid Renal Cell Carcinoma (sRCC) utilizing a large national cohort. As RN is the reference standard for localized RCC with clinically aggressive features, PN in sRCC has been seldom studied. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort analysis of the National Cancer Database from 2004 to 2019 for patients who underwent PN and RN for sRCC (T1-T3N0-N1M0). We performed multivariable analyses (MVA) to determine factors associated with PN and all-cause mortality (ACM), and Kaplan-Meier Analysis (KMA) for overall survival (OS) in Charlson 0 patients who underwent PN vs. RN according to clinical stage. RESULTS: The cohort consisted of 5,265 patients [RN 4,582 (87.0%)/PN 683 (13.0%)]. Increased odds of receiving PN was associated with papillary RCC (OR = 1.69, p = 0.015); inversely with increasing age (OR = 0.99, p = 0.004), cT2-cT3 (OR = 0.23, p < 0.001), and cN1 (OR = 0.2, p < 0.001). Worsened ACM was associated with positive margins (HR = 1.59, p < 0.001), male (HR = 1.1, p = 0.044), Charlson [Formula: see text]2 (HR = 1.47, p < 0.001), cT2-cT3 (HR 1.17-1.39, p < 0.001-0.035), and cN1 (HR = 1.59, p < 0.001). Improved ACM was noted with PN (HR = 0.64, p < 0.001), increasing household income (HR = 0.77-0.79, p < 0.001), and private insurance (HR = 0.80, p = 0.018). KMA showed PN had improved 5-year OS compared to RN in cT1 (86.5% vs. 63.2%, p < 0.001), and cT3 (61.0% vs. 44.0% p < 0.001), but not cT2 (p = 0.67). CONCLUSION: In select patients, PN with negative margins may not compromise outcomes and may provide benefit when indicated. Patients with private insurance and highest income experienced improved survival suggesting disparity in care.

Comparison of renal function between the artery and vein clamp and artery-only clamp in robot-assisted partial nephrectomy for moderate- to high-complexity renal masses: A propensity-matched study.

OBJECTIVE: Artery and vein (AV) clamps can control venous bleeding in the surgical field and prevent carbon dioxide embolism, especially when large veins are expected to open. However, whether AV clamps cause more renal damage than artery-only (AO) clamps remains unclear. This study aimed to compare renal function and blood loss in surgeries using AO and AV clamps based on high RENAL nephrometry scores (RNS) in robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN). METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the medical records of 500 patients who underwent RAPN between March 2016 and December 2021. We performed 1:1 propensity matching for these patients. RESULTS: A total of 340 patients with pathological malignancies who were followed up for at least 12 months were included in this analysis. A total of 291 patients with AO clamping and 49 patients with AV clamping were included. Overall, the AV clamp group had higher total RNSs and larger diameters than the AO clamp group. Propensity score-matched analysis included 37 patients in each clamp group. The median warm ischemia times of the AV and AO clamps were 25 and 22 min, respectively, with no significant difference. There were no statistically significant differences between the groups in the amount of blood loss, rate of acute kidney injury (AKI), or renal function at 1, 3, or 12 months post-RAPN. CONCLUSION: Compared with the AO clamp, the AV clamp did not have a detrimental impact on blood loss or renal dysfunction. Consequently, AV clamps may be considered for patients presenting with moderate-to-high-complexity RNSs.

Comparing open and robot-assisted partial nephrectomy - a single institution report.

BACKGROUND: Open partial nephrectomy (OPN) has previously been considered the gold standard procedure for treatment of T1 localized renal tumors. After introduction of robot assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) as an alternative method to OPN, OPN was gradually abandoned at our department. The aim of the study was to retrospectively compare the results of patients treated with either OPN or RAPN for suspected renal carcinoma. METHODS: Patients who underwent either open or robotic assisted partial nephrectomy between January 1st 2010 and December 31st 2020 were retrospectively included in the study. Each tumor subjected to surgery was scored preoperatively by the RENAL nephrometry score. Complications within 30 days were assessed according to the Clavien-Dindo classification system. RESULTS: A total of 197 patients who underwent partial nephrectomy were identified; 75 were subjected to OPN and 122 were treated with RAPN. There were no significant differences between the groups with respect to age (OPN: 63 years ± 11, RAPN: 62 years ± 10), gender (OPN: 71/29%, RAPN: 67/33%), body mass index (OPN: 28 ± 5, RAPN: 28 ± 5), ASA score (OPN: 2.4 ± 0.6, RAPN: 2.2 ± 0.5), or nephrometry score (OPN: 6.6 ± 1.7, RAPN: 6.9 ± 1.7, p = 0.2). The operative time was significantly shorter in the OPN group (81 min) compared to the RAPN group (144.5 min, p < 0.001). Mean perioperative blood loss was 227 ± 162 ml in the OPN group compared to 189 ± 152 ml in the RAPN group (p = 0.1). Mean length of stay was shorter in the RAPN group (3 days) compared to the OPN group (6, days, p < 0.001). Positive surgical margin rate was significantly higher in the OPN group (21.6%) compared to the RAPN group (4.2%, p < 0.001). There were no differences in the number of Clavien-Dindo graded complications between the groups (p = 0.6). CONCLUSIONS: The introduction of RAPN at our department resulted in shorter length of stay and fewer positive surgical margins, without increasing complications.

Renal glomus tumor: A case report and literature review.

Glomus tumors are rare mesenchymal tumors involving cells from the glomus body, smooth muscle, and vasculature, typically found in distal extremities' skin. This case describes a 54-year-old woman with a history of hypothyroidism and hyperlipidemia, incidentally discovered to have a four-centimeter calcified renal tumor. Surgery was performed due to suspected malignancy. Immunohistochemical staining confirmed a renal glomus tumor, positive for muscle actin and smooth muscle actin (SMA). The tumor was benign, and no adjuvant therapy was needed. The patient remained recurrence-free during follow-up. Renal glomus tumors are predominantly benign, with surgical resection as the primary treatment.

The Mayo Adhesive Probability Score as a Predictor of Postoperative Renal Function in Robot-assisted Partial Nephrectomy.

Background/Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the Mayo Adhesive Probability (MAP) score as a predictor of split renal function deterioration after robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN). Patients and Methods: A total of 30 patients who underwent RAPN were identified retrospectively. The parameters evaluated included patient characteristics, tumor diameter, MAP score, warm ischemic time (WIT), and renal function. Split renal function was evaluated using Tc-99m DTPA renal scintigraphy before and six months after surgery. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed. Results: Nine patients (30.0%) showed more than 90% preservation of split renal function on the operated side. The MAP score (p=0.015), cT1b tumor (p=0.0002), and WIT (p=0.044) were associated with preservation of split renal function six months after surgery on univariate analysis. The MAP score was the strongest predictor of preservation of split renal function six months after surgery on multivariable analysis (p=0.007). On receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, the MAP score (cutoff value 3.0; p=0.01) was a significant predictor of split renal function six months after surgery. Conclusion: The MAP score was significantly associated with postoperative split renal function six months after RAPN on the operated kidney side. The MAP score is useful for predicting split renal function after RAPN.

Unpredictable recurrence following partial nephrectomy for chromophobe renal cell carcinoma on an ectopic kidney: Case report and review of literature.

INTRODUCTION: Renal cell carcinoma is one of the 10 most common malignancies. Partial nephrectomy (PN) is the preferred treatment for localized ones. The incidence of local recurrence (LR) after a PN varies between zero and 17% in the literature. Managing a LR following PN is a challenging situation, both ablation therapy and salvage surgery are viable options. CASE PRESENTATION: A 38-year-old woman with a history of a right open partial nephrectomy performed on an ectopic kidney four years ago, presented a loco regional recurrence, involving the right ovary and rectus muscle, which we managed by a radical nephrectomy with bilateral oophorectomy et resection of the rectus muscle nodules. CLINICAL DISCUSSION: LR of RCC after PN presents a clinically challenging scenario. Treatment options include ablative therapy or surgical salvage therapy, which can be either by radical nephrectomy or by repeat partial nephrectomy. Ablative therapy has less complication rate and is preferred for small LR or on a solitary kidney. Repeat PN is also an option for preserving renal function but with high risk of complication. RN is an option if PN is technically challenging, especially in patients with a functional contralateral kidney. CONCLUSION: Recurrent renal cell carcinoma (RCC) can manifest differently based on the primary treatment, as well as tumor and patient characteristics. Managing a LR following PN is a challenging situation, both ablation therapy and salvage surgery are viable options.

Partial nephrectomy in elderly patients: a systematic review and analysis of comparative outcomes.

PURPOSE: The management of renal masses in the elderly population is particularly challenging, as these patients are often more frail and potentially more susceptible to surgical morbidity. This review aims to provide a comprehensive analysis of the outcomes of partial nephrectomy (PN) for treating renal masses in elderly individuals. METHODS: A systematic electronic literature search was conducted in May 2024 using the Medline (via PubMed) database by searching publications up to April 2024. The population, intervention, comparator, and outcome (PICO) model defined study eligibility. Studies were deemed eligible if assessing elderly patients (aged 70 years or older) (P) undergoing PN (I) with or without comparison between a different population (non-elderly) or a different treatment option (radical nephrectomy, ablation or active surveillance) (C) evaluating surgical, functional, and oncological outcomes (O). RESULTS: A total of 23 retrospective studies investigating the role of PN in elderly patients were finally included. PN emerged as a safe procedure also for older patients, demonstrating good outcomes. Preoperative evaluation of frailty status emerged to be paramount. Age alone was discredited as the sole reason to reject the use of PN. The main limitation is the retrospective nature of included studies and the lack of the assessment of elderly patients' frailty. CONCLUSIONS: The surgical treatment of renal masses in older patients is a challenging scenario. PN should be chosen over RN whenever possible since it can better preserve renal function. The use of minimally invasive techniques should be favored in this extremely fragile group of patients.

Partial nephrectomy without prior arterial embolization in a case of giant renal angiomyolipoma.

INTRODUCTION AND IMPORTANCE: This is a case of giant renal angiomyolipoma treated with partial nephrectomy without pre-embolization of the supplying arteries. CASE PRESENTATION: The patient presented for regular checkup, a mass in the left flank was found on examination. No other symptoms were present. No history of medical or surgical importance was found. CLINICAL DISCUSSION: CT scan revealed a heterogenous mass in the left kidney at the upper pole. The treatment options were discussed with the patient and he opted for complete removal of the mass. Partial nephrectomy was done without pre embolization of the arteries. The procedure went without complications, the blood loss was manageable during the operation (200 cc). The patient was admitted for 48 h post operation and was discharged shortly after. The excised mass was sent for histopathological examination, the report was received, the features of the mass was consistent with angiomyolipoma without other types of malignant masses present. CONCLUSION: The takeaway is that partial nephrectomy provides a convenient option for treatment of giant renal angiomyolipomas. Preservation of the renal function, reduction of the recurrence risk or re embolization of the supplying arteries makes it a viable alternative for other treatment modalities.

Effectiveness of soft coagulation in robot-assisted partial nephrectomy in preventing pseudoaneurysms and its influence on renal function based on propensity score-matched analysis.

Background: Renal artery pseudoaneurysm (RAP) is one of the most stressful and life-threatening complications of partial nephrectomy, the standard treatment for small renal cell carcinoma. The use of a monopolar soft coagulation system for hemostasis during robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) is expected to prevent post-surgical RAP development. In this study, we aimed to investigate how the use of a soft coagulation system in RAPN reduces postoperative pseudoaneurysms and changes renal function over time. Methods: The incidence of pseudoaneurysms and postoperative renal function were compared in 208 partial nephrectomies performed between May 2016 and March 2023 at a single institution, with propensity score matching to balance patient backgrounds. Outcomes were analyzed using multivariate logistic or linear regression analyses. Results: In total, 80 matched pairs were analyzed. One (1.2%) and eighteen (22.5%) pseudoaneurysms were found in the soft coagulation users and non-users, respectively (P<0.001). Compared to the non-user group, postoperative estimated glomerular filtration rates (eGFRs) in the user group were 89% vs. 96% (P<0.001), 87% vs. 93% (P=0.009), and 88% vs. 92% (P=0.15) at 1, 3, and 12 months, respectively. Subsequent multivariate analyses showed a lower incidence of pseudoaneurysms in the user group with an odds ratio of 0.05 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.01 to 0.44; P=0.007], and no significant difference in the rate of change in renal function at 12 months postoperatively (-1.1%, 95% CI: -5.5% to 3.3%; P=0.61). Conclusions: The use of a soft coagulation system reduces pseudoaneurysm occurrence after partial nephrectomy. Although renal function decreased in the short-term for the use group, no long-term differences were observed.

The application of laparoscopic ultrasound-guided intervention in renal hybrid surgery: case report.

Background: Conventional vascular interventions and hybrid surgery relied on digital subtraction angiography (DSA). Previously our center explored hybrid partial nephrectomy with DSA guidance, which demonstrates the superiority of omitting the dissection of renal hilum. However, this approach is limited to scarce hybrid operating rooms, involves radiation exposure, and poses compatibility issues with robotic surgery platforms. Laparoscopic ultrasound (LUS) can assist in robotic surgery. This study explored the application of LUS-guided occlusion of renal artery blood supply with a Fogarty balloon catheter, particularly in hybrid partial nephrectomy for renal tumor treatment. Case Description: The LUS-guided renal artery balloon catheter occluded hybrid partial nephrectomy (UBo-HPN) involved several steps: trans-femoral artery cannulation, placement of the balloon catheter into the renal artery via the femoral vascular sheath, occlusion of the renal blood supply by inflating the balloon catheter, completion of zero-ischemia partial nephrectomy with arterial flow occluded, withdrawal of the balloon catheter after deflation. For all three patients, the balloon catheter was successfully and accurately placed into the selected renal artery under LUS guidance. Intraoperative occlusion of the renal blood supply was confirmed to be complete and reversible. No complications were observed during follow-up. Conclusions: LUS guidance presents a safe alternative to DSA guidance for assisting in hybrid surgery. LUS-guided hybrid partial nephrectomy is safe and feasible.