[Development and Application of Deep Learning-Based Model for Quality Control of Children Pelvic X-Ray Images].

Objective: A deep learning-based method for evaluating the quality of pediatric pelvic X-ray images is proposed to construct a diagnostic model and verify its clinical feasibility. Methods: Three thousand two hundred and forty-seven children with anteroposteric pelvic radiographs are retrospectively collected and randomly divided into training datasets, validation datasets and test datasets. Artificial intelligence model is conducted to evaluate the reliability of quality control model. Results: The diagnostic accuracy, area under ROC curve, sensitivity and specificity of the model are 99.4%, 0.993, 98.6% and 100.0%, respectively. The 95% consistency limit of the pelvic tilt index of the model is -0.052-0.072. The 95% consistency threshold of pelvic rotation index is -0.088-0.055. Conclusion: This is the first attempt to apply AI algorithm to the quality assessment of children's pelvic radiographs, and has significantly improved the diagnosis and treatment status of DDH in children.

Acetabular index as an indicator of Pavlik harness success in grade I developmental dysplasia of the hip: A retrospective study.

Purpose: Some articles have focused on the effectiveness of the Pavlik harness treatment for unstable and dislocated hips, yet data on monitoring its effectiveness with the acetabular index remains elusive. Therefore, this study aimed to assess Pavlik harness effectiveness in infants ≤6 months diagnosed with grade I developmental dysplasia of the hip using acetabular index improvement and identify the possible predictors of successful Pavlik harness treatment. Methods: A retrospective review of infants with grade I acetabular dysplasia treated with a Pavlik harness and monitored with anteroposterior pelvis X-rays at presentation and follow-up. Successful treatment was defined as achieving an acetabular index <30°. Results: A total of 231 infants with acetabular dysplasia were treated with a Pavlik harness. A successful outcome was achieved in 135 infants (58.4%). Younger age, lower initial acetabular index, and patients with unilateral developmental dysplasia of the hip were significant predictors of a successful outcome. An age of 4.5 months or older was found to be the threshold for an unsuccessful result following Pavlik harness treatment, with a sensitivity of 65.2% and specificity of 57.3%. An initial acetabular index of 35.5° was found to be the threshold for an unsuccessful result, with a sensitivity of 83.7% and specificity of 61.5%. Conclusion: Pavlik Harness's success in correcting the acetabular index in acetabular dysplasia patients was related to unilateral cases, a younger age at presentation, and a lower initial acetabular index. The thresholds for unsuccessful treatment were an age of 4.5 months or greater and an acetabular index of 35.5° or higher.

The trauma pelvic X-ray: Not all pelvic fractures are created equally.

BACKGROUND: The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the role of the initial pelvic X-ray in identifying significant pelvic fractures, which could result in changes in the management of the patient. METHODS: Patients admitted to a level I trauma center (2010-2019) with a severe blunt pelvic fracture (AIS ≥3) were identified. Included in the analysis were patients who underwent emergency department pelvic X-ray followed by CT scan. A control group of patients without pelvic fractures was also included in the study. All investigations were reviewed by a blinded attending trauma radiologist. Pelvic X-ray findings and CT scan reports were compared according to the specific pelvic fracture location, and severity. RESULTS: Overall, pelvic X-ray was diagnosed 252 of the 285 pelvic fractures (sensitivity 88.4%) and wrongly diagnosed a facture in 3 of 97 patients without a fracture (specificity 96.9%). In 29/184 (15.8%) of patients with pelvic fracture AIS 3, the pelvic X-ray was read as normal, missing the fracture, compared with 4/101 (4.0%) in the AIS 4/5 group (p = 0.003). Pelvic X-ray had the lowest sensitivity in ischial (10.7%), iliac (28.7%), acetabular (42.4%), and sacral fractures (49.1%) and was best for detecting symphysis diastasis (89.8%). CONCLUSION: Pelvic X-ray is useful in identifying pubic symphysis diastasis. However, it misses or underestimates a significant number of fractures. CT scan evaluation should be performed in patients with a suspicious mechanism or clinical suspicion of pelvic fracture.

El fin de la protección gonadal en radiografía de pelvis: una revisión / The end of gonadal protection in pelvic radiography: a review

Resumen: La protección gonadal ha sido durante largo tiempo un importante factor para abordar el requisito "tan bajo como sea razonablemente posible" ALARA. El presente artículo realiza una revisión sistemática sobre la utilidad de la protección gonadal en la radiografía de pelvis en la cual se han destacado los factores que tienen que ver con su realización diaria, es decir, la dosis de radiación involucrada, la radiosensibilidad de las gónadas, la posición del protector gonadal y el factor psicológico de la población en relación con su uso. La incorporación de equipamientos modernos, con dosis y protocolo optimizados, transforma el beneficio de la protección en un tema al menos debatible. Mientras algunos siguen respaldando la medida, otros organismos y autores ya no la respaldan. Es necesario reconsiderar prácticas actuales fundadas en consensos científicos que pueden estar obsoletos y considerar el factor de cambio cultural basados en estos nuevos consensos para su implementación, sin generar mayor preocupación en la población.

Abstract: Gonadal protection has long been an important factor in addressing the ALARA "as low as reasonably possible" requirement. This article performs a systematic review on the usefulness of gonadal protection in pelvic radiography, in which the factors that have to do with its daily performance have been highlighted, that is, radiation dose involved, the radiosensitivity of the gonads, the position of the gonadal shielding and the psychological factor of the population in relation to its use. The incorporation of modern equipment, with optimized dose and protocols, transforms the benefit of gonad shielding into an issue that is at least debatable. While some continue to support the measure, other agencies and authors no longer support it. It is necessary to reconsider current practices based on scientific consensus that may be obsolete and consider the factor of cultural change based on these new consensus for its implementation, without generating major concern in the population.

Integrating extended focused assessment with sonography for trauma (eFAST) in the initial assessment of severe trauma: Impact on the management of 756 patients.

BACKGROUND: Before total body computed tomography scan, an initial rapid imaging assessment should be conducted in the trauma bay. It generally includes a chest x-ray, pelvic x-ray, and an extended focused ultrasonography assessment for trauma. This initial imaging assessment has been poorly described since the increase in the use of ultrasound. Therefore, our study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy and therapeutic impact of this initial imaging work-up in severe trauma patients. A secondary aim was to assess the therapeutic impact of a chest x-ray according to the lung ultrasonography findings. METHODS: Patients with severe trauma who were admitted directly to our level 1 trauma center were consecutively included in this retrospective single center study. The diagnostic accuracy, therapeutic impact, and appropriate decision rate were calculated according to the initial assessment results of the whole body computed tomography scan and surgery reports. RESULTS: Among the 1315 trauma patients admitted, 756 were included in this research. Lung ultrasound showed a higher diagnostic accuracy for haemothorax and pneumothorax cases than the chest x-ray. Sensitivity and specificity of the abdominal ultrasound to detect intraperitoneal effusion were 70% and 96%, respectively. The initial assessment had a therapeutic impact in 76 (10%) of the patients, including 16 (2%) immediate laparotomies and 58 (7%) chest tube insertions. The pelvic x-ray had no therapeutic impact, and when the lung ultrasound was normal, the chest x-ray had a therapeutic impact of only 0.13%. Combining the chest x-ray and lung ultrasound allowed adequate management of all the pneumothorax and haemothorax cases. Only one of the 756 patients had initial management that was judged as inappropriate. This patient had a missed pelvic disjunction with active retroperitoneal bleeding, and underwent an inappropriate immediate laparotomy. CONCLUSIONS: In our cohort, the initial imaging assessment allowed appropriate decisions in 755 of 756 patients, with a global therapeutic impact of 10%. The pelvic x-ray had a minimal therapeutic impact, and in the patients with normal lung ultrasounds, the chest x-ray marginally affected the management of our patients. The potential consequences of abandoning systematic chest and pelvic x-rays should be investigated in future randomized prospective studies.

The value of 'binder-off' imaging to identify occult and unexpected pelvic ring injuries.

AIMS: To determine the effectiveness of 'binder-off' plain pelvic radiographs in the assessment of pelvic ring injuries. PATIENTS AND METHODS: All patients requiring operative intervention at our tertiary referral pelvic unit/major trauma centre for high-energy pelvic injuries between April 2012 and December 2014 were retrospectively identified. Pre-operative pelvic imaging with and without pelvic binder was reviewed with respect to fracture pattern and pelvic stability. The frequency with which the imaging without pelvic binder changed the opinion of the pelvic stability and need for operative intervention, when compared with the computed tomography (CT) scans and anteroposterior (AP) radiographs with the binder on, was assessed. RESULTS: Seventy-three percent (71 of 97) of patients had initial imaging with a pelvic binder in situ. Of these, 76% (54 of 71) went on to have 'binder-off' imaging. Seven percent (4 of 54) of patients had unexpected unstable pelvic ring injuries identified on 'binder-off' imaging that were not identified on CT imaging in binder. CONCLUSIONS: Trauma CT imaging of the pelvis with a pelvic binder in place is inadequate at excluding unstable pelvic ring injuries, and, based on the original findings in this paper, we recommend additional plain film 'binder-off' radiographs, when there is any clinical concern.

Radiation dose and magnification in pelvic X-ray: EOS™ imaging system versus plain radiographs.

BACKGROUND: In plain pelvic X-ray, magnification makes measurement unreliable. The EOS™ (EOS Imaging, Paris France) imaging system is reputed to reproduce patient anatomy exactly, with a lower radiation dose. This, however, has not been assessed according to patient weight, although both magnification and irradiation are known to vary with weight. We therefore conducted a prospective comparative study, to compare: (1) image magnification and (2) radiation dose between the EOS imaging system and plain X-ray. HYPOTHESIS: The EOS imaging system reproduces patient anatomy exactly, regardless of weight, unlike plain X-ray. MATERIAL AND METHOD: A single-center comparative study of plain pelvic X-ray and 2D EOS radiography was performed in 183 patients: 186 arthroplasties; 104 male, 81 female; mean age 61.3±13.7years (range, 24-87years). Magnification and radiation dose (dose-area product [DAP]) were compared between the two systems in 186 hips in patients with a mean body-mass index (BMI) of 27.1±5.3kg/m2 (range, 17.6-42.3kg/m2), including 7 with morbid obesity. RESULTS: Mean magnification was zero using the EOS system, regardless of patient weight, compared to 1.15±0.05 (range, 1-1.32) on plain X-ray (P<10-5). In patients with BMI<25, mean magnification on plain X-ray was 1.15±0.05 (range, 1-1.25) and, in patients with morbid obesity, 1.22±0.06 (range, 1.18-1.32). The mean radiation dose was 8.19±2.63dGy/cm2 (range, 1.77-14.24) with the EOS system, versus 19.38±12.37dGy/cm2 (range, 4.77-81.75) with plain X-ray (P<10-4). For BMI >40, mean radiation dose was 9.36±2.57dGy/cm2 (range, 7.4-14.2) with the EOS system, versus 44.76±22.21 (range, 25.2-81.7) with plain X-ray. Radiation dose increased by 0.20dGy with each extra BMI point for the EOS system, versus 0.74dGy for plain X-ray. CONCLUSION: Magnification did not vary with patient weight using the EOS system, unlike plain X-ray, and radiation dose was 2.5-fold lower. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3, prospective case-control study.

A novel computer-based method for measuring the acetabular angle on hip radiographs.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to propose a new computer based method for measuring acetabular angles on hip radiographs and to assess its practicality, sensitivity and reliability for acetabular angle measurement. METHODS: A total of 314 acetabulum were assessed on 157 pelvic X-ray images. Acetabular angles were measured with both the conventional method (Method 1) and our proposed method (Method 2). All the Acetabular Index (AI) angle, Acetabular Angle (AA) and Acetabular Center (ACM) angle were measured with both methods. RESULTS: The mean AI angle for Method 1 is 11.02° ± 2.7° and the mean AI angle for Method 2 is 10.08° ± 1.88°, the mean AA angle for Method 1 is 39.5° ± 5.3° and the mean AA angle for Method 2 is 39.36° ± 4.68°, the mean ACM angle for Method 1 is 50.5° ± 6.01° and the mean ACM angle for Method 2 is 55.42° ± 12.43°. CONCLUSION: Our novel automated method appear to be reliable and practical for acetabular angle measurement on hip radiographs. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, Diagnostic study.

AO pelvic fracture classification: can an educational package improve orthopaedic registrar performance?

BACKGROUND: The unstable pelvic fracture has been described as the 'killing fracture' because of the risk of significant vascular compromise. The ability to correctly classify pelvic fractures may therefore be crucial in optimizing patient outcomes. Pelvic fracture classification is difficult and previous research has indicated that ability is suboptimal in orthopaedic registrars. The objective of this study was to examine the efficacy of an educational package in improving orthopaedic registrars' ability to classify pelvic fractures. METHODS: A total of 35 orthopaedic registrars were recruited in this classification study. An educational package was used to introduce the AO classification of pelvic fractures and teach the registrars how to classify pelvic fractures using pelvic X-rays and computed tomography scans. A classification test assessed their classification ability before and after using the educational package. A third test was performed 2 weeks after the second to assess the stability of learning. RESULTS: The mean score at baseline of 8.4 ± 0.46 increased to 10.5 ± 0.48 after using the educational package, and this was maintained in the follow-up test (10.7 ± 0.54 (F(2,52) = 15.5, P < 0.001)). The proportion of registrars achieving a satisfactory score increased from 46% (16/35) to 77% (23/30) after training, and 90% (19/21) at follow-up (χ2 (2) = 6.74, P = 0.035). CONCLUSION: The reliability with which orthopaedic registrars classified pelvic fractures was improved using an educational package. An educational package on pelvic fracture classification may prove to be a valuable addition to the orthopaedic training programme.

Quality-controlled dose-reduction of pelvic X-ray examinations in infants with hip dysplasia.

BACKGROUND: Digital plain radiography (DR) examinations of the pelvis are frequently performed in infants with hip dysplasia. OBJECTIVE: The purpose was to reduce the radiation dose and to determine objective quality control criteria to ensure accurate assessment. This seems feasible because of higher quantum efficiency of DR and easy assessable anatomical structures for most orthopaedic measurements. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Institutional review board approval was obtained. In this prospective randomized study, 264 patients underwent X-ray examination of the pelvis with standard and reduced dose. The evaluation of the plain-radiographs was conducted using the following criteria: acetabular and center edge angle, closing of the epiphyseal plates and maturation of the femoral head. Two radiologists evaluated these criteria using a score ranging from 1 (definitely assessable) to 4 (not assessable). If a single criterion had been evaluated with a score of 3 or more points or more than 2 criteria with 2 points, the radiograph was scored as "not assessable". The statistical analysis was conducted as non-inferiority-trial. RESULTS: Five (1.9%) examined X-rays were scored as not assessable. There was no statistical inferiority between the examinations with standard (4.57 µSv) or reduced dose (3.06 µSv). Also, the individual evaluation of the defined criteria was dose-independent. CONCLUSION: The adequate evaluation of hip dysplasia in children and young adults on pelvic radiographs is possible with reduced radiation dose, by simple using an exposure class of 800 instead of 400.

Role of pelvic X-ray in blunt trauma patients -- A university hospital experience in Oman.

OBJECTIVE: To confirm the safety of the advanced trauma life support algorithm by comparing the incidence of pelvic fractures diagnosed by pelvic X-ray and computed tomography and to evaluate the need of pelvic X-ray in the management of haemodynamically stable polytrauma patients in whom computed tomography is deemed necessary. METHODS: The prospective study was conducted at Sultan Qaboos University, Muscat, Oman, from January to December 2012, and comprised stable blunt trauma patients treated according to advanced trauma life support guidelines. All the patients underwent pelvic X-ray on presentation and later had computed tomography scan of abdomen and pelvis. Radiology reports were filed by the on-call radiologist prospectively. The reports were reviewed retrospectively. Data was analysed using SPSS 19. RESULTS: Of the 67 patients, 59(88%) were male and 8(12%) were females. The overall mean age was 32.09±12.28 years (range: 14-77 years) Pelvic X-rays showed no fracture in 62(92.5%) cases compared to 55(82.1%) scans. All cases that were positive on pelvic X-ray were detected by scan. Pelvic X-ray revealed only 4(6%) patients as having only pelvic fracture and 1(1.5%) as femoral head fracture. Computed tomography scan was able to detect 6(9%) pelvic fractures, 2(3%) femoral fractures and 4(6%) lumbar fractures. CONCLUSIONS: Computed tomography scan was found to be superior in detecting pelvic, femoral and lumbar fractures.

The selection of diagnostic modalities in the management of pelvic fracture patients requiring transfers.

INTRODUCTION: Pelvic fractures can result in life-threatening hemorrhages. Therefore, pelvic fracture patients must usually be transferred to a trauma center for additional management. We attempted to analyze transferred pelvic fracture patients to determine which diagnostic modalities to use in different treatment settings. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From May 1, 2008, to February 28, 2014, patients with pelvic fractures who were transferred from other local hospitals within 24 hours after the trauma were enrolled. We compared the pre-transfer conditions and pelvic X-ray results from the local hospitals between the group of patients that underwent further angioembolization at the trauma center and the group that did not. The role of computed tomography (CT) in the decision-making process (i.e., regarding additional angioembolization) at the different institutions was discussed. RESULTS: In total, 751 patients were enrolled in the current study. Of the patients who received further angioembolization at the trauma center, 77.6 % (121/156) had sacro-iliac (SI) joint disruption on their pre-transfer pelvic X-ray; this rate was significantly higher than that of the patients who did not undergo further embolization (77.6 % vs. 25.5 %, p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in the use of pre-transfer CT scans at the local hospitals between the patients who underwent angioembolization and those who did not (53.8 % vs. 50.3 %, p = 0.472). Furthermore, of these patients, there was no significant difference in the length of emergency department stay (from arrival to angioembolization) at the trauma center among the patients who underwent pre-transfer CT scans and those who did not (97.4 ± 69.3 minutes vs. 108.6 ± 21.8 minutes, p = 0.461). CONCLUSION: When managing patients with pelvic fractures, the more attention should be paid to those with SI joint disruption on pelvic X-ray. Because these patients are more likely to require further angioembolization, they should be transferred earlier. Additional CT may be performed after the patient's transfer to the trauma center to determine subsequent treatment.

Evaluation of tubal microinserts position using 3D ultrasound and pelvic X-ray.

PURPOSE: To retrospectively compare three-dimensional ultrasonography (3D-US) and pelvic X-rays to assess the position of tubal sterilization microinserts. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Forty-four patients who underwent tubal sterilization with Essure(®) microinserts in our institution were included. The microinserts'position was evaluated three months after the procedure using 3D-US and pelvic X-rays. Placement on 3D-US was binary categorized as correct or incorrect and the distance between the two devices was reported. The orientation and symmetric deployment of the microinserts and the distance between the proximal parts of the two devices was assessed on pelvic X-rays. Performance of 3D-US and pelvic X-ray were compared using Mac Nemar test. Comparison of the distance between the two devices measured on pelvic X-rays and 3D-US was made with the paired Student t test. RESULTS: 3D-US images showed microinserts in 93% (41/44). Eighty-six percent (38/44) were correctly positioned on 3D-US and 82% (36/44) on pelvic X-rays. No significant differences between the performances of the two imaging techniques were found. No significant differences for the distance between the two devices measured on pelvic X-ray and 3D-US was found. CONCLUSION: 3D-US is a simple, non-ionizing technique, which appears as a promising alternate technique to pelvic X-rays to assess the correct position of Essure(®) microinserts.

Pelvic X-ray examinations in follow-up of hip arthroplasty or femoral osteosynthesis--dose reduction and quality criteria.

OBJECTIVE: Digital plain radiographs of the pelvis are frequently performed in follow-up examinations of patients who received total hip arthroplasty (THA) or osteosynthesis (OS). Thus, the purpose was to reduce the radiation dose and to determine objective quality control criteria to ensure accurate assessment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Institutional review board approval was obtained. In this prospective randomized study, 289 patients underwent X-ray examination of the pelvis as follow up after receiving THA or OS with standard and reduced dose. The evaluation of the plain radiographs was conducted using the following criteria: bone-implant interface, implant-implant discrimination, implant-surface character and periarticular heterotopic ossification. Two radiologists evaluated these criteria using a score ranging from 1 (definitely assessable) to 4 (not assessable). If a single criterion had been evaluated with a score of 3 or more or more than 2 criteria with 2 points, the radiograph was scored as "not assessable". The study was designed as non-inferiority-trial. RESULTS: Seven (2.4%) examined X-rays were scored as not assessable. There was no statistical inferiority between the examinations with standard (0.365 mSv) or reduced dose (0.211 mSv). Reduced dose only led to limitations in the evaluation of ceramic components with low clinical impact in most scenarios. CONCLUSION: Plain radiography of the pelvis in patients with THA or OS can be performed with a dose reduction of about 42% without a loss of important information. The obtained quality control criteria were clinically applicable.