People and biodiversity in the 21st century : This article belongs to Ambio's 50th Anniversary Collection. Theme: Biodiversity conservation.

Fifty years have elapsed since the first publication of Ambio. Throughout this period, fundamental changes have occurred in societal attitudes to biodiversity conservation. Ambio has published numerous papers that have aligned with these new approaches. High citations numbers suggest that Ambio papers have had a significant impact on conservation strategies. We review these publications and find that they align well with changed societal perspectives on biodiversity. Ambio papers have called for greater contributions of local and indigenous peoples and for conservation in multi-functional landscapes. The 1992 Convention on Biological Diversity built on these principles. Negotiations are now underway for a post-2020 framework for biodiversity. Ambio papers have argued for a stronger scientific basis for conservation and for the need to adapt to changing conditions and to the rich diversity of societal preferences for conservation. International processes favor simple, generalizable approaches to conservation but we call for recognition of the diversity of ecological and human conditions in which conservation occurs. There is a need to build capacity to support a diversity of conservation approaches that are adapted to changing local conditions and to the priorities of diverse human societies.

An Australian perspective on rewilding.

Rewilding is increasingly recognized as a conservation tool but is often context specific, which inhibits broad application. Rewilding in Australia seeks to enhance ecosystem function and promote self-sustaining ecosystems. An absence of large-bodied native herbivores means trophic rewilding in mainland Australia has focused on the restoration of functions provided by apex predators and small mammals. Because of the pervasive influence of introduced mesopredators, predator-proof fences, and establishment of populations on predator-free islands are common rewilding approaches. This sets Australian rewilding apart from most jurisdictions and provides globally relevant insights but presents challenges to restoring function to broader landscapes. Passive rewilding is of limited utility in arid zones. Although increasing habitat extent and quality in mesic coastal areas may work, it will likely be necessary to undertake active management. Because much of Australia's population is in urban areas, rewilding efforts must include urban areas to maximize effectiveness. Thus rewilding is not synonymous with wilderness and can occur over multiple scales. Rewilding efforts must recognize human effects on other species and benefit both nature and humans. Rewilding in Australia requires development of a shared vision and strategy and proof-of-concept projects to demonstrate the benefits. The repackaging of existing conservation activities as rewilding may confuse and undermine the success of rewilding programs and should be avoided. As elsewhere, rewilding in Australia should be viewed as an important conservation tool.

Una Perspectiva Australiana del Proceso de Resilvestrar Resumen El proceso de resilvestrar es reconocido cada vez más como una herramienta de conservación, pero con frecuencia depende del contexto ambiental, lo que inhibe su aplicación generalizada. En Australia, el proceso de resilvestrar busca mejorar la función ambiental y promover los ecosistemas auto-sustentables. Una ausencia de herbívoros nativos corpulentos significa que el resilvestreo trófico en la isla principal de Australia se ha enfocado en la restauración de las funciones que proporcionan los superdepredadores y los mamíferos pequeños. Debido a la influencia generalizada de los mesodepredadores introducidos, los cercos contra depredadores y el establecimiento de poblaciones en islas libres de depredadores son estrategias comunes de resilvestreo. Esto coloca al resilvestreo australiano aparte del que ocurre en muchas jurisdicciones y proporciona información relevante a nivel mundial, pero presenta retos para la restauración de la función en paisajes más amplios. El resilvestreo pasivo es de utilidad limitada en las zonas áridas. Aunque el aumento de la extensión del hábitat y la calidad en las áreas meso-costeras puede funcionar, probablemente sea necesario emprender un manejo activo. Ya que la mayoría de la población de Australia se encuentra en áreas urbanas, los esfuerzos de resilvestreo deben incluir a las áreas urbanas para maximizar su efectividad. Por lo tanto, el resilvestreo no es sinónimo de la naturaleza y puede ocurrir en múltiples escalas. Los esfuerzos de resilvestreo deben reconocer los efectos que los humanos tienen sobre otras especies y deben beneficiar a la naturaleza y a las personas. El resilvestreo en Australia requiere del desarrollo de una visión compartida y de proyectos con prueba de concepto para demostrar sus beneficios. La reinvención de las actividades de conservación existentes como resilvestreo podría confundir y debilitar el éxito de los programas de resilvestreo, por lo que debería evitarse. Como en todos lados, el proceso de resilvestrar en Australia debería verse como una herramienta importante de conservación.