Comparison of staged versus one shot varicose veins treatment: Depending on tributaries diameter.

BACKGROUND: One of the most debatable phlebology community's issue is the choice of the optimal tactics for endovenous varicose tributaries correction after truncal ablation. Which tactic will be most effective? There is practically no data concerning treatment tactics' choice for varicose tributary depending on its diameter. Therefore, the comparison of staged versus one-stage treatment of varicose veins is relevant problem in modern phlebology. Research on this topic will make possible determination of advantages and potential disadvantages of the proposed tactics. METHODS: The study included a prospective analysis of the combined treatment of 295 patients with primary varicose veins who underwent outpatient treatment. RESULTS: Simultaneous EVLA of saphenous trunks and ligation (gentle phlebectomy) of visible large-diameter tributaries (6 mm or more) with staged sclerotherapy after a month, has significant potential benefits. CONCLUSION: The use of staged varicose veins treatment minimizes the traumatic intervention and discomfort for the patient, while achieving satisfactory treatment results without affecting the quality of life.

Development and External Validation of a Prediction Model for Patients with Varicose Veins Suitable for Isolated Ambulatory Phlebectomy.

OBJECTIVE: Isolated ambulatory phlebectomy is a potential treatment option for patients with an incompetent great saphenous vein (GSV) or anterior accessory saphenous vein and one or more incompetent tributaries. Being able to determine which patients will most likely benefit from isolated phlebectomy is important. This study aimed to identify predictors for avoidance of secondary axial ablation after isolated phlebectomy and to develop and externally validate a multivariable model for predicting this outcome. METHODS: For model development, data from patients included in the SAPTAP trial were used. The investigated outcome was avoidance of ablation of the saphenous trunk one year after isolated ambulatory phlebectomy. Pre-defined candidate predictors were analysed with multivariable logistic regression. Predictors were selected using Akaike information criterion backward selection. Discriminative ability was assessed by the concordance index. Bootstrapping was used to correct regression coefficients, and the C index for overfitting. The model was externally validated using a population of 94 patients, with an incompetent GSV and one or more incompetent tributaries, who underwent isolated phlebectomy. RESULTS: For model development, 225 patients were used, of whom 167 (74.2%) did not undergo additional ablation of the saphenous trunk one year after isolated phlebectomy. The final model consisted of three predictors for avoidance of axial ablation: tributary length (< 15 cm vs. > 30 cm: odds ratio [OR] 0.09, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.02 - 0.40; 15 - 30 cm vs. > 30 cm: OR 0.18, 95% CI 0.09 - 0.38); saphenofemoral junction (SFJ) reflux (absent vs. present: OR 2.53, 95% CI 0.81 - 7.87); and diameter of the saphenous trunk (per millimetre change: OR 0.63, 95% CI 0.41 - 0.96). The discriminative ability of the model was moderate (0.72 at internal validation; 0.73 at external validation). CONCLUSION: A model was developed for predicting avoidance of secondary ablation of the saphenous trunk one year after isolated ambulatory phlebectomy, which can be helpful in daily practice to determine the suitable treatment strategy in patients with an incompetent saphenous trunk and one or more incompetent tributaries. Patients having a longer tributary, smaller diameter saphenous trunk, and absence of terminal valve reflux in the SFJ are more likely to benefit from isolated phlebectomy.

ASVAL with Phlebectomy/Sclerofoam Technique: Preliminary Results.

The ambulatory selective varicose vein ablation under local anesthesia (ASVAL) method recommends preserving the great saphenous vein (GSV), unless there is a serious terminal valve insufficiency, and suggests phlebectomy of superficial varicose reservoir as a primary treatment. To increase patient comfort, foam safety and cosmetic results, we used ASVAL with a mixed phlebectomy/foam technique on local anesthesia. Thirty consecutive patients treated with ASVAL phlebectomy-sclerofoam technique were reviewed retrospectively between December 2022 and April 2023. All patients were evaluated by clinical examination and duplex ultrasound (DUS); the main selection criteria were a minimal GSV insufficiency (main GSV < or = to 1 cm). Muller phlebectomy of tributaries at entry point in the saphenous trunk was performed; after 1 week, patients were checked for foam sclerotherapy of residual trunk. Under visual control, 0.5% polidocanol foam (from 5 to 10 cc. "Tessari Technique") was injected in visible veins and elastic compression with pad was applied for 1 week. Compression with Class I elastic stockings was prescribed, and patients were reviewed after 1 month. Postoperative complications included thigh hematoma in two patients, three thrombosis of injected trunk, and hyperpigmentation in three patients. No GSV thrombosis at DUS was recorded. In 27 patients, a satisfying cosmetic result was achieved, and in 3 patients a new foam session was needed. Phlebectomy/foam ASVAL technique is a safe, low-traumatic technique with no need of US guidance, with less risk of foam migrating in GSV, simple and inexpensive, for patients with less advanced GSV insufficiency.

CHIVA for dummies.

BACKGROUND: Sparing the Great Saphenous Vein capital for possible arterial substitution and recurrence decrease may be an alternative to current ablation options for Varicose Veins treatment. Conservative surgery of varicose veins (CHIVA) was suggested in 1988 by Franceschi, by limited veins interruptions in strategic points. However, the method did not diffuse due to the need for high Duplex expertise to determine the procedure in every single patient. METHOD: Evaluation of the literature regarding saphenous sparing, with special reference to CHIVA. RESULT: It has been realized that basic Ultrasound expertise is sufficient for performing GSV conservation. Most of the time, only a few parameters are needed: a junction competence assessment and a re-entry perforator position. CONCLUSION: For achieving the goal of saphenous conservative treatment, a limited phlebectomy and possible Junction interruption (crossotomy) may be a simplified solution.

A Narrative Review of Advancements in Understanding and Treating Varicose Veins.

Chronic venous disease, with varicose veins as its archetypal manifestation, stands as a pervasive and intricate health quandary, encompassing a vast array of contributing factors. Age, genetics, obesity, pregnancy, and prolonged immobility weave a complex tapestry, underscoring the omnipresence of this ailment. Its societal and economic footprint is undeniably formidable, as diverse classifications underscore its multifaceted character. The intricate interplay of chronic venous disease with diabetes mellitus and neuropathy compounds the challenge, fostering soaring healthcare expenditures and a palpable erosion of quality of life, particularly among women harboring cardiometabolic risk factors. Despite research shedding light on heightened susceptibility within certain demographics, the enigmatic determinants orchestrating the transition from mild to severe chronic venous disease continue to elude us. Varicose veins, marked by the presence of dilated and tortuous subcutaneous vessels, precipitate both physical discomfort and cosmetic concerns, frequently necessitating meticulous clinical evaluation coupled with ultrasound studies to secure a precise diagnosis. Treatment strategies are strategically crafted to ameliorate distressing symptoms, enhance aesthetic concerns, and forestall potential complications. Nevertheless, the prognostication of chronic venous disease remains ensconced in a degree of ambiguity, hinting at the vast terrain yet to be charted in this medical domain. The quest to fathom the intricacies of this condition uncovers an ever-evolving panorama where conservative interventions play an indispensable role in managing mild cases, while interventional procedures like endovenous laser ablation and sclerotherapy step onto the stage for patients grappling with severe symptoms, thus treading the fine line between efficacy and invasiveness. Moreover, a meticulous economic analysis underscores the cost-effectiveness of various therapeutic modalities, thereby bolstering the imperative of a patient-centered approach. As we navigate the labyrinthine complexities of chronic venous disease and varicose vein management, we are inexorably drawn to the pivotal role of customized treatment approaches, as well as the dynamic interplay between scientific progress, patient preferences, and therapeutic innovations in the relentless pursuit of optimized outcomes and an enhanced quality of life.

Endovenous Laser Ablation-Phlebectomy-Sclerotherapy Hybrid Treatment for Venous Insufficiency: A Case Report.

A hybrid treatment approach was used to successfully manage bilateral varicose veins in a 50-year-old female patient. The patient had venous insufficiency and presented with pain, swelling, and discoloration in her legs. The treatment plan consisted of two sessions of endovenous laser ablation (EVLA) to treat venous reflux, followed by two phlebectomies for residual bulging varicose veins. After a three-month follow-up, an ultrasound evaluation showed no venous reflux, indicating successful treatment. However, small reticular and spider veins remained, so the patient underwent four sessions of foam sclerotherapy using polidocanol as the sclerosant. On her three-month follow-up post-sclerotherapy, the patient reported significant improvement in symptoms, and ultrasound evaluation showed no venous reflux in major veins. The hybrid approach combining EVLA, sclerotherapy, and phlebectomy provided effective treatment for the patient, resulting in symptom improvement and positive cosmetic outcomes.

Ultrasound-guided percutaneous laser ablation of tributary varicose veins using a slim-type radial fiber.

OBJECTIVE: This study presents the efficacy of ultrasound-guided percutaneous laser ablation of tributary varicose veins using a slim-type radial 2-ring fiber. METHODS: One thousand consecutive patients who underwent endovenous laser ablation (EVLA) of incompetent saphenous veins were included. The tributary varicose veins were punctured with a 16G venule needle and ablated with a 1470 nm laser system and a slim-type radial 2-ring fiber with a diameter of 1.27 mm. The EVLA was performed with a power of 5W and linear endovenous energy density of around 30 J/cm. RESULTS: Percutaneous varicose ablation was safely performed in 939 legs with an average of 5.9 times punctures per leg. No skin burn or nerve injury was observed after varicose ablation. Ultrasonography revealed complete occlusion of the treated veins 1 month after EVLA. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that percutaneous varicose ablation with a slim-type radial 2-ring fiber is a safe and effective alternative to cover the weak point of ambulatory phlebectomy.

Thromboembolic outcomes are decreased with the use of a standardized venous thromboembolism risk assessment and prophylaxis protocol for patients undergoing superficial venous procedures.

OBJECTIVE: Patients with venous insufficiency can be treated with ablation or phlebectomy, or both. Patients undergoing superficial venous procedures have an elevated risk of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE). At our institution, we initiated a standardized protocol in which patients with a Caprini score (2005 version) of ≥8 are treated with 1 week of prophylactic anticoagulation after the procedure. Duplex ultrasound was performed at 1 week and then within 90 days after the procedure. This aim of the present study was to determine the thrombotic and clinical outcomes after superficial vein procedures using a standardized protocol for DVT/PE risk assessment and prophylaxis. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data of superficial vein procedures from 2015 to 2021 at a single center. The patient demographics, CEAP (Clinical-Etiology-Anatomy-Pathophysiology) clinical class, venous clinical severity score, patient-reported outcomes, treatment type, Caprini scores, pre- and postoperative anticoagulation use, and outcomes were collected. Descriptive statistics were used for the patient demographics, procedure details, and unadjusted surgical outcomes. Multivariable logistic regression was used to evaluate the relationship between procedure type and DVT and PE after adjusting for patient characteristics, disease severity, periprocedural anticoagulation, and Caprini score. RESULTS: A total of 1738 limbs were treated with ablation (n = 820), phlebectomy (n = 181), or ablation and phlebectomy (n = 737). More patients were women (67.1%) and White (90.9%). The overall incidence of DVT/PE was 1.4%. Patients undergoing ablation with phlebectomy had higher rates of DVT/PE (2.7%) than those undergoing ablation (0.2%) or phlebectomy alone (1.7%; P < .01). However, only 30% of DVTs were above the knee. On multivariate analysis, only the procedure type predicted for DVT/PE. However, patients undergoing ablation and phlebectomy achieved better patient-reported outcomes (Caprini score, 5.9) compared with those undergoing ablation (Caprini score, 7.2) or phlebectomy (Caprini score, 7.9) alone (P < .01). The best improvement in the venous clinical severity score was seen with phlebectomy alone. CONCLUSIONS: The expected difference in the DVT/PE rates between high- and low-risk groups did not materialize in our patients, perhaps secondary to the additional chemoprophylaxis prescribed for the high-risk cohort (Caprini score, ≥8). These results call for a randomized trial to assess the efficacy of a standardized protocol in the reduction of DVT/PE after superficial vein procedures.

Personal factors and postoperative changes in the revised Venous Clinical Severity Score of varicose veins.

OBJECTIVE: The primary aim of this observational study was to measure the Revised Venous Clinical Severity Score (rVCSS) in patients treated for varicose veins (VVs) owing to saphenous vein reflux. Treatment was by endovenous thermal ablation (ETA) alone or by ETA and ambulatory phlebectomy (AP). A secondary aim was to determine whether participant characteristics and treatment methods affect rVCSS and how the score changes over time. METHODS: We enrolled 44 men with 55 treated legs and 79 women with 105 treated legs (bilateral cases, 23.1%). Patients were treated and evaluated from April 2016 to September 2020. All legs were treated by ETA, and participants were divided into three groups depending on AP treatment: E0 group (40 legs), no AP; EP1 group (101 legs), AP performed only at one site above or below the knee; and EP2 group (19 legs), AP performed both above and below the knee. The rVCSS was measured in the treated legs up to five times: preoperatively and on postoperative days (POD) 1, 7, 90, and 180. RESULTS: The mean age was 67.5 ± 11.24 years (range, 32-87 years). No significant differences in medical history or demographics or lifestyle were found between the groups. The mean preoperative rVCSS also was not different between groups (E0, 4.4 ± 0.3 points; EP1, 4.6 ± 0.2 points; and EP2, 5.4 ± 0.4 points; P = .14). Factors associated with less improvement in the rVCSS were a high body mass index (P = .046) and the occurrence of endovenous heat-induced thrombosis (P = .001), and factors associated with more improvement in the rVCSS were hypertension (P = .026), hyperuricemia (P = .022), and wearing compression stockings (P = .013). The rVCSS decreased strongly at POD1 and then gradually decreased until POD180. It was not significantly different between EP1 and EP2, but it improved significantly earlier in these two groups than in the E0 group. The rVCSS at POD180 was as follows: E0, 1.633 ± 0.233 points; EP1, 1.003 ± 0.148 points; and EP2, 0.982 ± 0.322 points. CONCLUSIONS: Factors associated with less improvement in the rVCSS are a high body mass index and the occurrence of endovenous heat-induced thrombosis. Hypertension, hyperuricemia, and wearing compression stockings are associated with greater improvements in the rVCSS. Patients treated with ETA and AP tend to improve earlier than patients treated by ETA alone, but all patients improve to nearly the same level within 6 months.

Treatment and contemporary outcomes associated with adjunct tourniquet use during phlebectomy of complex, voluminous truncular varicosities.

OBJECTIVE: Phlebectomy of large voluminous varicose veins comes with a risk of substantial blood loss. The purpose of the present study was to investigate the outcomes associated with the use of an adjunct tourniquet during varicose vein surgery of complex and large truncular varicosities. METHODS: The prospectively collected registry data included anatomic and outcomes details for patients who presented with complex and large truncular varicosities with a CEAP clinical class of C2, or higher (indicating more serious venous disease) from December 2014 to December 2021. Of all patients, those treated with an adjunct tourniquet for large complex varicosities (largest diameter varicosity ≥1 cm by visual inspection) were selected for analysis. The venous clinical severity scores (VCSSs) and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) were obtained. Additional parameters, including operative time, tourniquet time, and blood loss, were obtained retrospectively via a review of the medical records. Univariate descriptive statistics of the demographic and procedural data were performed pre- and postoperatively, with comparisons performed using the Student two-tailed t test. RESULTS: The data from 19 patients (22 limbs; 7 women and 12 men) were analyzed. Of the 22 limbs, 11 (50%) had advanced venous disease of C4 or higher preoperatively. A review of the preoperative duplex ultrasound scans confirmed the presence of large varicosities (average, 1.0 ± 0.54 cm; n = 18). All the limbs were treated using radiofrequency ablation of axial reflux and phlebectomy (a combination of powered and stab) under tourniquet control (82%) or phlebectomy under tourniquet control alone (18%). The average tourniquet time was 40 ± 12 minutes, with a median blood loss of 50 mL (interquartile range, 30-100 mL). The average follow-up was 332 ± 422 days after 19 procedures for 16 patients (2 patients moved out of state during the immediate postoperative period and 1 patient was lost to follow-up). Of the patients who completed >3 months of follow-up, 14 limbs experienced improvement in the CEAP class, 5 limbs had no change, and 3 were limbs of patients who moved or were lost to follow-up. The VCSSs significantly improved (8.8 ± 2.8 vs 3.9 ± 1.9; P < .0001). The PROs also improved significantly (16.1 ± 5.0 vs 2.2 ± 2.3; P < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: Tourniquet use in the treatment of varicosities has only been described in the setting of high ligation and stripping. Our data suggest that in the modern era of minimally invasive endovenous treatment of axial reflux and phlebectomy, adjunct tourniquet use during the treatment of large complex varicosities can result in significant improvements in the VCSSs and PROs, with minimal blood loss.

Ambulatory outpatient venous surgery service: An examination of patient satisfaction and experiences.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to ascertain patients' experience of the out-patient venous service being provided,; identify the level of patient satisfaction with the service and identify areas for further improvement and development. METHOD: A prospective descriptive quantitative study. A questionnaire was distributed to all patients who used the service between June 2017 and March 2018. A total of 195 questionnaires was distributed with 162 valid questionnaires returned; response rate of 83%. RESULTS: This study found high satisfaction levels with endovenous ablation procedures, with concomitant phlebectomy, in the ambulatory outpatient setting and patient experiences of the service are overwhelmingly positive. CONCLUSION: Study findings support the management of ambulatory outpatient varicose vein endovenous ablation procedures as a feasible alternative to day surgery theatre settings and is the blueprint for future management of varicose vein surgery in Ireland.

Ambulatory Phlebectomy and Sclerotherapy as Tools for the Treatment of Varicose Veins and Telangiectasias.

Treatment of chronic venous disease is a fascinating and rewarding undertaking. Once the truncal reflux is addressed, several options are available that can be used to treat the associated ulcers, varicosities, reticular veins, and telangiectasias. This review will focus on two widely employed procedures: ambulatory phlebectomy and sclerotherapy.

Randomized clinical trial of radiofrequency-induced thermotherapy combined with transilluminated powered phlebectomy versus high ligation and stripping for the treatment of lower limb varicose veins.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of radiofrequency-induced thermotherapy (RFiTT) combined with transilluminated powered phlebectomy (TIPP) in the treatment of lower limb varicose veins (VVs) in comparison with high ligation and stripping (HLS) combined with TIPP. METHODS: The patients with lower limb VVs were randomly assigned to RFiTT combined with TIPP or HLS combined with TIPP. The primary end point was total closure rate of the great saphenous vein at 12 months. Secondary end points included Venous Clinical Severity Score and 14-item Chronic Venous Insufficiency Questionnaire score changes at 12 months and perioperative complications. RESULTS: The total closure rate of the great saphenous vein at 12 months was slightly lower in the RFiTT group (90.9% [90/99]) than in the HLS group (97.0% [98/101]) but not statistically significant (χ2 = 0.068; P = .08). Operation time, intraoperative blood loss, duration in hospital, duration in bed, and resumption of activities were statistically significantly better with RFiTT than with HLS. There were no significant differences between the groups in deep venous thrombosis, phlebitis, hematomas, pain, and infection. However, skin pigmentation and paresthesia were statistically significantly better with RFiTT than with HLS. At 12 months, both groups showed similar improvement from baseline in Venous Clinical Severity Score (1.28 ± 0.57 in the RFiTT group vs 1.33 ± 0.61 in the HLS group) and 14-item Chronic Venous Insufficiency Questionnaire score (67.32 ± 1.29 in the RFiTT group vs 67.45 ± 1.32 in the HLS group); however, neither group was superior to the other. CONCLUSIONS: RFiTT combined with TIPP is an effective treatment method for lower limb VVs and had a more satisfactory clinical outcome in surgical data, skin pigmentation, and paresthesia than HLS at the 12-month follow-up.

Systematic review of ambulatory selective variceal ablation under local anesthetic technique for the treatment of symptomatic varicose veins.

OBJECTIVE: The ambulatory selective variceal ablation under local anesthesia (ASVAL) technique subscribes to the "ascending" theory of varicose vein etiology, which recommends primary ambulatory phlebectomy as a treatment for tributary varicosities and truncal vein incompetence. This systematic review explores the efficacy and safety of the ASVAL technique for the treatment of symptomatic varicose veins. METHODS: A comprehensive search of the Medline and Embase databases and the Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials in May 2019 revealed 11 original articles that were qualitatively reviewed. The primary outcome was the absence from recurrent varicose veins at 1-year follow-up. Secondary outcomes were resolution of great saphenous vein (GSV) reflux on duplex ultrasound, change in GSV diameter, objective and subjective clinical improvement in chronic venous disease, and patient-reported outcome measures. RESULTS: A total of 2106 limbs underwent intervention in 1734 patients reported in two randomized controlled trials, one case control study, three cohort studies, and five case series. Varicosity recurrence at 1 year ranged from 0.5% to 13.5% in patients. Of 1622 limbs with diagnosed GSV incompetence before intervention, 1114 were competent at 1 year (mean, 68.2% [±12.62%]). All studies measuring GSV diameter reported statistically significant reductions in vein size. CONCLUSIONS: ASVAL may be considered as a minimally invasive treatment for early stages of chronic venous disease in the presence of truncal reflux. The evidence base should be strengthened by prospective randomized controlled trials that follow standardized procedures and report according to recognized measures of quality of life alongside clinical and hemodynamic data.

Concomitant vs. Staged Treatment of Varicose Tributaries as an Adjunct to Endovenous Ablation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

OBJECTIVE: This review compares the outcomes of both concomitant and staged superficial varicose tributary (SVT) interventions as an adjunct to endovenous truncal ablation. METHODS: A systematic search of Medline through Pubmed, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials was last performed in November 2019. All studies comparing the outcomes of both concomitant and staged treatments for SVT as an adjunct to endovenous truncal ablation were included. Each included study was subject to an evaluation of methodological quality using the Downs and Black assessment tool. Outcomes assessed included rates of re-intervention, complications, and thrombotic events. Quality of life (QOL) and disease severity were also analysed. Data were pooled with a random effects model. RESULTS: Fifteen studies (6 915 limbs) were included for analysis. Included studies were of reasonable methodological quality. Re-intervention rates were significantly lower in the concomitant group (6.3% vs. 36.1%) when compared with staged intervention (relative risk [RR] 0.21 [95% CI 0.07-0.62], p = .004, I2 = 90%, p ≤ .001). Reported complications (RR 1.14 [95% CI 0.67-1.93], p = .64) and rates of deep venous thrombosis (RR 1.41 [95% CI 0.72-2.77] p = .31) were similar in each group. Overall disease severity (Venous Clinical Severity Score) was lower in the concomitant group (-1.16 [95% CI, -1.97- -0.35] p = .005), while QOL, assessed using the Aberdeen Varicose Vein Questionnaire, favoured concomitant treatment when measured at less than three months (weighted mean difference [WMD] -3.6 [95% CI, -7.17- -0.03] p = .050) and between three and 12 months (WMD -1.61 [95% CI, -2.99- -0.23] p = .020). CONCLUSION: Concomitant and staged treatments are safe and effective. Improvements in early disease severity and QOL scores were better in the concomitant group. While meta-analysis suggests that concomitant intervention offers significantly lower rates of re-intervention, studies assessing its merits are subject to some biases. This benefit was not reflected by the randomised trial subgroup analysis, which identified no difference in re-intervention.

Comparative evaluation of the results of surgical treatment of acute ascending thrombophlebitis of the great saphenous vein using the endovascular high-frequency welding technique and traditional technique.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to conduct a comparative evaluation of the effectiveness of surgical treatment of acute ascending thrombophlebitis of the great saphenous vein using the endovascular high-frequency welding technique and traditional phlebectomy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Materials and methods: Two groups were formed in the conducted study. Group I included patients (n=42) with the acute ascending thrombophlebitis of the great saphenous vein, in whom their thrombosed great saphenous vein was removed using the endovascular high-frequency welding technique. As a source of current, an EK300M1 Svarmed electric welding machine (Ukraine) was used. Electric welding of a thrombosed vein segment was carried out using the endovenous electric welding catheter. Group II included patients (n=31) with the acute ascending thrombophlebitis of the great saphenous vein, who underwent the traditional phlebectomy of the thrombosed great saphenous vein according to Babcock's technique. RESULTS: Results: In group I no patient revealed presence of pain syndrome with significant intensity during the postoperative period. An infiltrate along the coagulated segments ofnthe great saphenous vein, postoperative oedema and paresthesiae were observed in considerably fewer cases from group I versus group II (р=0.0005, р=0.0001, р=0.0018). During their follow-up for more than 12 months, 2 (4.76 %) of 42 patients from group I revealed partial recanalization of the great saphenous vein (р=0.632). In group I the postoperative inpatient period was 1.3±0.1 days. In group II the above period averaged 4.8±0.8 days (p<0.001). Absence of an intense pain syndrome in group I was caused by a gentle effect of high-frequency electric current itself on the venous wall and paravasal structures. A significant reduction of side effects and complications with a shorter stay of patients in hospital versus the traditional phlebectomy was achieved owing to reduction in the extent of injury of the surgical operation itself with the use of endovascular high-frequency welding. CONCLUSION: Conclusions: The technique of endovascular high-frequency welding in treatment of acute ascending thrombophlebitis of the great saphenous vein makes it possible to reduce the extent of injury of the surgical operation versus the traditional phlebectomy, results in a significant decrease in the number of side effects and complications and shortens the period of the patient's stay in hospital.

Surgical management of a large postoperative vulvar haematoma following vulvar phlebectomy and ovarian vein embolization for vulvar varicose veins: A case report.

Vulvar varicose veins (VVs) are seen in 4% of women, most of them secondary to pregnancy and usually regressing spontaneously. The treatment of choice during pregnancy is conservative and symptomatic. Management of vulvar varicosities in non-pregnant women consists of various techniques, including phlebectomy, endovascular embolization or surgical ligation of contributing veins, sclerotherapy and, recently, conservative treatment with the venoactive agent MPFF (micronized purified flavonoid fraction). We report an unusual case of a large hematoma of the right labium majus following bilateral vulvar phlebectomy and embolization of the left ovarian vein. The patient was a non-pregnant woman, who underwent incision and drainage of this rare complication. At follow-up almost a year after this procedure the patient reported comfort and cosmetic satisfaction regarding her vulvar symptoms. A multidisciplinary team approach to vulvar varicosities is important, with the involvement of gynecologists, angiologists, interventional radiologists and vascular surgeons.

Clinical response to combination therapy in the treatment of varicose veins.

BACKGROUND: Varicose vein ablation procedures are being performed with increasing frequency; however, there is a lack of consensus on the relative efficacy of combined treatment of saphenous incompetence and symptomatic varicosities vs a staged approach. In this study, we examined the impact on symptom severity when a procedure to eliminate varicosities was added to standard endovenous saphenous ablation. METHODS: The Varicose Vein Module of the American Venous Registry was established by the American Venous Forum in 2010 and collected data from 48 physicians during a 5-year period. We analyzed patients with Clinical, Etiology, Anatomy, and Pathophysiology (CEAP) C2 disease severity and without prior treatment. Combination therapy (CT) was defined as the use of a procedure directly addressing visible varicosities (stab phlebectomy or injection of sclerosant into varicosity) combined with endovenous saphenous vein ablation. Unimodal therapy (UT) was defined as endovenous saphenous vein ablation alone (radiofrequency or laser). Change in symptom severity was assessed by the pretreatment and 1-month follow-up Venous Clinical Severity Score (VCSS). Univariate statistics compared the CT and UT groups, with P values obtained using the Student t-test or Pearson χ2 test as appropriate. A multivariable linear regression model assessed the association of CT with the change in VCSS. RESULTS: There were 526 patients included for analysis (UT, 97; CT, 429). UT patients were more likely to be white (85.6% vs 62.7%; P < .001), had a higher initial VCSS (6.71 vs 5.07; P < .001), and were assessed at an earlier follow-up visit (28.9 days postoperatively vs 33.3 days; P < .001). Compared with UT, CT was associated with an additional half-point reduction in VCSS on univariate analysis (-3.71 points for UT vs -4.20 for CT; P = .13). After treatment, CT was associated with significantly lower scores on the pain and varicose vein components of the VCSS (pain: 0.31 for UT vs 0.07 for CT [P = .0008]; varicose veins: 0.47 for UT vs 0.03 for CT [P < .001]). On the multivariable model, after adjustment for white race, day of follow-up, age group, and initial VCSS, CT was associated with an additional reduction in VCSS of 1.52 points compared with UT (P = .002). CONCLUSIONS: Invasive treatment of C2 chronic venous insufficiency improves symptom severity. Whereas treatment of venous reflux is essential to address venous symptoms, our results suggest that patients further benefit from additional direct treatment of varicosities. For selected patients, CT may present a more effective treatment strategy than saphenous ablation alone.

[Extensive purulent processes after combined phlebectomy]. / Obshirnye nagnoitel'nye protsessy posle kombinirovannoi flebéktomii.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the causes and develop methods for the treatment of extensive purulent processes after combined phlebectomy in patients with lower limb varicose veins. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The authors reported 3 cases of extensive phlegmon after phlebectomy for the period from 2014 to 2018. It is shown that comprehensive debridement of purulent-inflammatory lesion with application of additional methods including high-energy exposure by the air-plasma flow is essential for effective treatment of this complication. In addition, literature review showed only few observations of severe septic complications after traditional varicose vein surgery. RESULTS: Radical debridement of purulent wounds with wide excision of necrotic subcutaneous tissue and fascia, combination of standard surgical technique and plasma scalpel, as well as subsequent plasmodynamic staged wound repair in a therapeutic mode prevented severe purulent-inflammatory process, stopped systemic inflammatory syndrome and resulted fast wound healing. CONCLUSION: Active surgical approach combined with air-plasma technology was followed by high-quality correction of extensive suppurative process. Minimally invasive management of varicose disease with improvement of surgical techniques will minimize the likelihood of these complications.