Influenza B Virus: Target and acting mechanism of antiviral drugs.

The influenza B virus is one of the causes of seasonal influenza, which has a long history of existence in various populations. Adolescents, children, pregnant women, the elderly, as well as patients with major diseases such as high blood pressure, diabetes, and cancer, and those with low immunity are more susceptible to infection by the influenza virus. During the influenza seasons, the influenza B virus can cause significant harm and economic burden. At present, neuraminidase inhibitors, hemagglutinin inhibitors and RNA polymerase inhibitors are the main antiviral drugs that are used in the clinical treatment of influenza B. Due to the repeated use of antiviral drugs in recent years, the emergence of resistant strains of the influenza virus exacerbated. By combining anti-viral drugs with different mechanisms of action or using a combination of traditional Chinese medicine and chemical drugs, the problem of reduced drug sensitivity can be improved. This article introduces the drug targets of the influenza B virus and the mechanism of virus resistance. It also emphasizes the clinically used antiviral drugs and their mechanisms of action, thereby providing a reference basis for the development of new anti-influenza drugs.

PARP Inhibitors in Pancreatic Cancer with Homologous Recombination Repair Gene Mutations: A Single-Institution Experience.

BACKGROUND: Limited data are available regarding the anticancer activity of PARP inhibitors (PARPis) in pancreatic cancer with mutations in HRR genes other than BRCA and PALB2. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the clinical characteristics and outcomes of 48 patients with advanced pancreatic cancer harboring pathogenic germline and/or somatic HRR mutations who were treated with PARPis. RESULTS: Thirty patients had germline (g)HRR mutations only, twelve had somatic (s)HRR mutations only, and six had concomitant gHRR and sHRR mutations. The objective response rate (ORR) was 22%. The median progression-free survival (mPFS) and overall survival (mOS) were 6.9 and 11.5 months, respectively. Five patients received olaparib in the front-line setting due to borderline performance status. Their ORR was 20%, and their mPFS and mOS were both 11.3 months. The ORR was higher in patients with BRCA or PALB2 mutations (germline or somatic) than in those with non-BRCA/PALB2 mutations. Patients with somatic non-BRCA/PALB2 variants had a shorter mPFS. Patients with concomitant gHRR/sHRR mutations or gHRR mutations alone had a significantly longer mPFS than those with sHRR mutations only. CONCLUSIONS: PARP inhibitors may be considered for patients with advanced pancreatic cancer harboring pathogenic alterations of BRCA who cannot tolerate standard chemotherapy. Maintenance PARPis can be considered in selected patients with non-BRCA/non-PALB2 HRR mutations.

Baloxavir Resistance Markers in Influenza A and B Viruses in the Americas.

Aim: Influenza control demands multifaceted strategies, including antiviral drugs. Baloxavir, a recent addition to influenza treatment, acts as an inhibitor of the Polymerase acid (PA) component of the viral polymerase. However, mutations associated with resistance have been identified. Purpose: This study analyzed PA gene sequences of influenza A and B viruses (IAV and IBV, respectively) reported in the Americas, retrieved from databases published until May 2023, to identify primary markers of resistance to baloxavir. Patients and Methods: PA gene sequences were obtained from the GISAID and NCBI databases, focusing on countries in the Americas with 500 or more sequences for IAV, and 50 or more sequences for IBV. Results: Of the 58,816 PA sequences analyzed for IAV, only 55 (0.1%) harbored resistance markers, representing approximately 1 in 1000 occurrence. The most frequent markers were I38V (21 cases) and I38M (7 cases) at position 38 of PA, followed by E199G (9 cases) at position 199. For IBV, 14,684 sequences were analyzed, of which only eight presented a resistance marker (0.05%). Five sequences had the M34I marker, while the remaining three had the I38V marker. While frequency of resistance markers in PA is comparable to other regions, these results highlight the need for enhanced sequencing efforts, particularly in Latin America. Such efforts would serve to intensify influenza surveillance and inform public health interventions. Conclusion: While baloxavir demonstrates efficacy against influenza, resistance markers have been identified, including pre-existing ones. Our study adds eight (IAV: six and IBV: two) new spontaneously occurring substitutions to the existing literature, highlighting the need for continued surveillance. Among these, I38M stands out due to its significant tenfold reduction in drug susceptibility. Therefore, vigilant monitoring of these resistance markers in IAV and IBV remains crucial for maintaining baloxavir's effectiveness and informing future public health interventions.

Structural basis of paramyxo- and pneumovirus polymerase inhibition by non-nucleoside small-molecule antivirals.

Small-molecule antivirals can be used as chemical probes to stabilize transitory conformational stages of viral target proteins, facilitating structural analyses. Here, we evaluate allosteric pneumo- and paramyxovirus polymerase inhibitors that have the potential to serve as chemical probes and aid the structural characterization of short-lived intermediate conformations of the polymerase complex. Of multiple inhibitor classes evaluated, we discuss in-depth distinct scaffolds that were selected based on well-understood structure-activity relationships, insight into resistance profiles, biochemical characterization of the mechanism of action, and photoaffinity-based target mapping. Each class is thought to block structural rearrangements of polymerase domains albeit target sites and docking poses are distinct. This review highlights validated druggable targets in the paramyxo- and pneumovirus polymerase proteins and discusses discrete structural stages of the polymerase complexes required for bioactivity.

[18F]F-Poly(ADP-Ribose) Polymerase Inhibitor Radiotracers for Imaging PARP Expression and Their Potential Clinical Applications in Oncology.

Including poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors in managing patients with inoperable tumors has significantly improved outcomes. The PARP inhibitors hamper single-strand deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) repair by trapping poly(ADP-ribose)polymerase (PARP) at sites of DNA damage, forming a non-functional "PARP enzyme-inhibitor complex" leading to cell cytotoxicity. The effect is more pronounced in the presence of PARP upregulation and homologous recombination (HR) deficiencies such as breast cancer-associated gene (BRCA1/2). Hence, identifying HR-deficiencies by genomic analysis-for instance, BRCA1/2 used in triple-negative breast cancer-should be a part of the selection process for PARP inhibitor therapy. Published data suggest BRCA1/2 germline mutations do not consistently predict favorable responses to PARP inhibitors, suggesting that other factors beyond tumor mutation status may be at play. A variety of factors, including tumor heterogeneity in PARP expression and intrinsic and/or acquired resistance to PARP inhibitors, may be contributing factors. This justifies the use of an additional tool for appropriate patient selection, which is noninvasive, and capable of assessing whole-body in vivo PARP expression and evaluating PARP inhibitor pharmacokinetics as complementary to the currently available BRCA1/2 analysis. In this review, we discuss [18F]Fluorine PARP inhibitor radiotracers and their potential in the imaging of PARP expression and PARP inhibitor pharmacokinetics. To provide context we also briefly discuss possible causes of PARP inhibitor resistance or ineffectiveness. The discussion focuses on TNBC, which is a tumor type where PARP inhibitors are used as part of the standard-of-care treatment strategy.

Expert Consensus Recommendations on the Management of Treatment-emergent Adverse Events Among Men with Prostate Cancer Taking Poly-ADP Ribose Polymerase Inhibitor + Novel Hormonal Therapy Combination Therapy.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Recent clinical trials have shown improvement in progression-free survival in men with metastatic prostate cancer (mPC) treated with combination poly-ADP ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitors (PARPi) and novel hormonal therapy (NHT). Regulatory bodies in the USA, Canada, Europe, and Japan have recently approved this combination therapy for mPC. Common adverse events (AEs) include fatigue, nausea and vomiting, and anemia. Nuanced AE management guidance for these combinations is lacking. The panel objective was to develop expert consensus on AE management in patients with mPC treated with the combination PARPi + NHT. METHODS: The RAND/University of California Los Angeles modified Delphi Panel method was used. AEs were defined using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events. Twelve experts (seven medical oncologists, one advanced practice registered nurse, three urologists, and one patient advocate) reviewed the relevant literature; independently rated initial AE management options for the agent suspected of causing the AE for 419 patient scenarios on a 1-9 scale; discussed areas of agreement (AoAs) and disagreement (AoDs) at a March 2023 meeting; and repeated these ratings following the meeting. Second-round ratings formed the basis of guidelines. KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS: AoDs decreased from 41% to 21% between the first and second round ratings, with agreement on at least one management strategy for every AE. AoAs included the following: (1) continue therapy with symptomatic treatment for patients with mild AEs; (2) for moderate fatigue, recommend nonpharmacologic treatment, hold treatment temporarily, and restart at a reduced dose when symptoms resolve; (3) for severe nausea or any degree of vomiting where symptomatic treatment fails, hold treatment temporarily and restart at a reduced dose when symptoms resolve; and (4) for hemoglobin 7.1-8.0 g/dl and symptoms of anemia, hold treatment temporarily and restart at a reduced dose after red blood cell transfusion. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: This expert guidance can support management of AEs in patients with mPC receiving combination PARPi + NHT therapy. PATIENT SUMMARY: A panel of experts developed guidelines for adverse event (AE) management in patients with metastatic prostate cancer treated with a combination of poly-ADP ribose polymerase inhibitors and novel hormonal therapy. For mild AEs, continuation of cancer therapy along with symptomatic treatment is recommended. For moderate or severe AEs, cancer therapy should be stopped temporarily and restarted at the same or a reduced dose when AE resolves.

Sofosbuvir-velpatasvir in children 3-17 years old with hepatitis C virus infection.

BACKGROUND: The safety and efficacy of sofosbuvir-velpatasvir in children aged 3-17 years with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection of any genotype were evaluated. METHODS: In this Phase 2, multicenter, open-label study, patients received once daily for 12 weeks either sofosbuvir-velpatasvir 400/100 mg tablet (12-17 years), 200/50 mg low dose tablet or oral granules (3-11 years and ≥17 kg), or 150/37.5 mg oral granules (3-5 years and <17 kg). The efficacy endpoint was sustained virologic response 12 weeks after therapy (SVR12). Dose appropriateness was confirmed by intensive pharmacokinetics in each age group. FINDINGS: Among 216 patients treated, 76% had HCV genotype 1% and 12% had genotype 3. Rates of SVR12 were 83% (34/41) among 3-5-year-olds, 93% (68/73) among 6-11-year-olds, and 95% (97/102) among 12-17-year-olds. Only two patients experienced virologic failure. The most common adverse events were headache, fatigue, and nausea in 12-17-year-olds; vomiting, cough, and headache in 6-11-year-olds; and vomiting in 3-5-year-olds. Three patients discontinued treatment because of adverse events. Four patients had serious adverse events; all except auditory hallucination (n = 1) were considered unrelated to study drug. Exposures of sofosbuvir, its metabolite GS-331007, and velpatasvir were comparable to those in adults in prior Phase 2/3 studies. Population pharmacokinetic simulations supported weight-based dosing for children in this age range. INTERPRETATION: The pangenotypic regimen of sofosbuvir-velpatasvir is highly effective and safe in treating children 3-17 years with chronic HCV infection.

Secondary cytoreductive surgery and oncologic outcomes in the era of targeted maintenance therapy for recurrent, platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer.

OBJECTIVES: To compare oncologic outcomes of secondary cytoreductive surgery (SCS) before and after FDA approval of Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor (PARPi) and bevacizumab maintenance therapies for platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer (PS-ROC). METHODS: Patients who underwent SCS for first recurrence of PS-ROC from 1/1/2013-1/1/2020 were identified. Exclusion criteria included prior chemotherapy for recurrence, bowel obstruction procedures, and palliative surgery. Data were dichotomized pre/post 1/2017, relative to FDA approval of PARPi and bevacizumab maintenance for ROC. Second progression-free survival (PFS2), the primary endpoint, was estimated using Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: Overall, 245 patients underwent SCS-131 (53%) pre- and 114 (47%) post-approval. Most patients had high-grade serous tumors (83% and 90%, respectively; p = 0.13). Deleterious BRCA1/2 alterations were identified in 27% (32/120) and 28% (32/113) of tested patients, respectively (p = 0.88). Disease-free intervals pre- and post-approval were: 6-12 months, 16% and 18%; 12-30 months, 56% and 59%; and >30 months, 28% and 24%, respectively (p = 0.73). Overall, 85% and 86% of patients, respectively, achieved complete gross resection (CGR; p > 0.99). PARPi maintenance use increased from 3.8% to 27% (p < 0.001) following approval, and bevacizumab from 1.5% to 12% (p < 0.001). Median PFS2 was 19 and 20.1 months, respectively. In the post group, 1-year PFS2 rate was 84.5% (95% CI, 75.7-90.4%) for patients with CGR vs 56.2% (95% CI, 29.5-76.2%) for those with residual disease; 3-year PFS2 rates were 31.3% (95% CI, 21.6-41.4%) and 12.5% (95% CI, 2.1-32.8%), respectively (p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: CGR during SCS is associated with improved PFS2 compared to suboptimal resection. Prospective randomized trials are warranted to elucidate the role of SCS as more therapeutics become available.

Major clinical research advances in gynecologic cancer in 2023: a tumultuous year for endometrial cancer.

In the 2023 series, we summarized the major clinical research advances in gynecologic oncology based on communications at the conference of Asian Society of Gynecologic Oncology Review Course. The review consisted of 1) Endometrial cancer: immune checkpoint inhibitor, antibody drug conjugates (ADCs), selective inhibitor of nuclear export, CDK4/6 inhibitors WEE1 inhibitor, poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors. 2) Cervical cancer: surgery in low-risk early-stage cervical cancer, therapy for locally advanced stage and advanced, metastatic, or recurrent setting; and 3) Ovarian cancer: immunotherapy, triplet therapies using immune checkpoint inhibitors along with antiangiogenic agents and PARP inhibitors, and ADCs. In 2023, the field of endometrial cancer treatment witnessed a landmark year, marked by several practice-changing outcomes with immune checkpoint inhibitors and the reliable efficacy of PARP inhibitors and ADCs.

Health-related quality of life in patients with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer treated with niraparib vs placebo: Results from the phase 3 randomized PRIMA/ENGOT-OV26/GOG-3012 trial.

OBJECTIVE: To assess patient-reported health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in patients with ovarian cancer (OC) who received niraparib as first-line maintenance therapy. METHODS: PRIMA/ENGOT-OV26/GOG-3012 (NCT02655016) enrolled patients with newly diagnosed advanced OC who responded to first-line platinum-based chemotherapy. Patients were randomized (2:1) to niraparib or placebo once daily in 28-day cycles until disease progression, intolerable toxicity, or death. HRQoL was assessed as a prespecified secondary end point using patient-reported responses to the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer QOL Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30), the EORTC QLQ Ovarian Cancer Module (EORTC QLQ-OV28), the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Ovarian Symptom Index (FOSI), and EQ-5D-5L questionnaires. Assessments were collected at baseline and every 8 weeks (±7 days) for 56 weeks, beginning on cycle 1/day 1, then every 12 weeks (±7 days) thereafter while the patient received study treatment. RESULTS: Among trial participants (niraparib, n = 487; placebo, n = 246), PRO adherence exceeded 80% for all instruments across all cycles. Patients reported no decline over time in HRQoL measured via EORTC QLQ-C30 Global Health Status/QoL and FOSI overall scores. Scores for abdominal/gastrointestinal symptoms (EORTC QLQ-OV28) and nausea and vomiting, appetite loss, and constipation (EORTC QLQ-C30) were higher (worse symptoms) in niraparib-treated patients than placebo-treated patients; except for constipation, these differences resolved over time. Patients did not self-report any worsening from baseline of fatigue, headache, insomnia, or abdominal pain on questionnaires. CONCLUSIONS: Despite some early, largely transient increases in gastrointestinal symptoms, patients with OC treated with niraparib first-line maintenance therapy reported no worsening in overall HRQoL.

A Successful Treatment of COVID-Induced Acute Idiopathic Pancreatitis with an RNA-Polymerase Inhibitor Agent.

Acute idiopathic pancreatitis (AIP) has been rarely linked to SARS-CoV-2 and its mechanism is not completely understood. As a result, its management, due to the heterogeneity of the literature, may pose a challenge. This case report describes a 59-year-old female who presented to the emergency department with severe epigastric pain, fever, and a positive SARS-CoV-2 polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test. Imaging confirmed acute interstitial pancreatitis, which was successfully managed using the viral RNA polymerase inhibitor, remdesivir. Pancreatitis-associated complications, such as sepsis and shock, are recognized as significant factors contributing to extended hospitalization and increased mortality rates. The management of autoimmune pancreatitis poses a challenge due to the diverse existing literature, resulting in a lack of standardized approaches. Although the impact on inpatient mortality of remdesivir remains uncertain, early administration of RNA polymerase inhibitors could alleviate complications and positively impact the duration of hospitalization. Further research is important to create optimal management strategies for complications related to COVID-19-related pancreatitis.

Next-generation therapies for pancreatic cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Pancreas ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a frequently lethal malignancy that poses unique therapeutic challenges. The current mainstay of therapy for metastatic PDAC (mPDAC) is cytotoxic chemotherapy. NALIRIFOX (liposomal irinotecan, fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin) is an emerging standard of care in the metastatic setting. An evolving understanding of PDAC pathogenesis is driving a shift toward targeted therapy. Olaparib, a poly-ADP-ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitor, has regulatory approval for maintenance therapy in BRCA-mutated mPDAC along with other targeted agents receiving disease-agnostic approvals including for PDAC with rare fusions and mismatch repair deficiency. Ongoing research continues to identify and evaluate an expanding array of targeted therapies for PDAC. AREAS COVERED: This review provides a brief overview of standard therapies for PDAC and an emphasis on current and emerging targeted therapies. EXPERT OPINION: There is notable potential for targeted therapies for KRAS-mutated PDAC with opportunity for meaningful benefit for a sizable portion of patients with this disease. Further, emerging approaches are focused on novel immune, tumor microenvironment, and synthetic lethality strategies.

Clinical guidelines for ovarian cancer: the Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology guidelines.

Since the latest practice guidelines for ovarian cancer were developed by the Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology (KSGO) in 2021, many studies have examined the efficacy and safety of various treatments for epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). Therefore, the need to develop recommendations for EOC treatments has been raised. This study searched the literature using 4 key items and the Population, Intervention, Comparison, and Outcome: the efficacy and safety of poly-ADP ribose polymerase inhibitors in newly diagnosed advanced EOC; the efficacy and safety of intraperitoneal plus intravenous chemotherapy in optimally debulked advanced EOC; the efficacy and safety of secondary cytoreductive surgery in platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer; and the efficacy and safety of the addition of bevacizumab to platinum-based chemotherapy in first platinum-sensitive recurrent EOC patients who received prior bevacizumab. The evidence for these recommendations, according to each key question, was evaluated using a systematic review and meta-analysis. The committee of ovarian cancer of the KSGO developed updated guidelines for treatments of EOC.

Comparison of poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPis) as maintenance therapy for newly-diagnosed and platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer with BRCA mutational status: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Poly(adenosine diphosphate [ADP]-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) treatment for ovarian cancer (OC) are ever-changing. This study aimed to compare the efficacy and overall safety of available PARPi as maintenance therapy for BRCA mutation status in patients with newly diagnosed and platinum-sensitive recurrent (PSR) OC patients. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Relevant RCTs were systematically retrieved from PubMed and Embase until 31 May 2022. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) based on BRCA mutation status and adverse events (AEs) regardless of mutation were efficacy and safety endpoints. RESULTS: In newly diagnosed BRCAm-OC patients, olaparib (HR: 0.33; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.25, 0.43) and other PARPis [niraparib (HR: 0.40; 95% CI: 0.29, 0.55), rucaparib (HR: 0.40; 95% CI: 0.21, 0.76) and veliparib (HR: 0.44; 95% CI: 0.28, 0.69)] had a statistically significant effect on PFS versus placebo. In BRCAm-PSROC patients, Olaparib exhibited significant benefit (HR: 0.69; 95% CI: 0.54, 0.88) for OS compared to other PARPis. In BRCAwt-PSR OC patients, Olaparib showed a favorable OS benefit than other PARPis (HR: 0.84; 95% CI: 0.57,1.22). Overall, safety profile of all PARPis was acceptable. CONCLUSION: All PARPis showed significant benefit, with olaparib showing greater benefit in newly diagnosed and PSR OC women. REGISTRATION: CRD42021288932.

Associations between pharmaceutical industry payments to physicians and prescription of PARP inhibitors in the United States.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the association between industry payments to physicians related to poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPis) and physicians' prescribing behaviors for PARPis. METHODS: This panel-data analysis used the publicly accessible Open Payments Database and Medicare Part D database between 2017 and 2021. All physicians who reported >10 claims for either olaparib, rucaparib, or niraparib were included in this study. Non-research payments for the PARPis to the physicians from the PARPi manufacturers were extracted from the Open Payments Database. Associations between the physicians' receipt of payments and likelihood of prescribing PARPis were assessed with logistic generalized estimating equations (GEEs). Dose-response associations between the number of payments and prescription volumes and Medicare expenditures were evaluated with linear GEEs. RESULTS: Of the 1686 eligible physician prescribers, 68.7% received one or more non-research payments related to any of the three PARPis from the manufacturers between 2017 and 2021. Median annual payments per physician were $57 for olaparib, $39 for rucaparib, and $62 for niraparib. Receipt of payments for each PARPi was associated with higher odds of prescribing olaparib (odds ratio [OR]: 1.30 [95% CI: 1.14-1.48], p < 0.001), rucaparib (OR: 2.07 [95% CI: 1.58-2.72], p < 0.001), and niraparib (OR: 1.49 [95% CI: 1.22-1.81], p < 0.001). Dose-response effects were observed between the number of annual payments and the number of prescriptions and/or Medicare expenditures for olaparib and rucaparib. CONCLUSION: Non-research payments to physician prescribers of PARP inhibitors from the manufacturers were significantly associated with increased prescriptions and Medicare expenditures for olaparib and rucaparib in the United States.

Combining Novel Hormonal Therapies with a Poly (ADP-Ribose) Polymerase Inhibitor for Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: Emerging Evidence.

Preclinical and clinical studies have suggested potential synergies of combining poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors and novel hormonal therapies (NHT) for patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). We systematically searched PubMed, ClinicalTrials.gov and ASCO-GU annual meeting abstracts up to March 2023 to identify potential phase III trials reporting the use of combining PARP inhibitors with NHT in the first-line setting for mCRPC. A total of four phase III trials met the criteria for subsequent review. Emerging data suggested that the radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS) was significantly longer in the PARP inhibitor combined with NHT group versus the placebo plus NHT group for the first-line setting of biomarker-unselected mCRPC patients, especially for patients with homologous recombination repair (HRR) mutation (HRR m), and with the greatest benefit for BRCA1/2 mutation (BRCA1/2 m) populations. Final overall survival (OS) data of the PROpel trial indicated a significant improvement in median OS for mCRPC patients with HRR m and BRCA1/2 m receiving olaparib + abiraterone. Prior taxane-based chemotherapy might not influence the efficacy of the combination. Compared with the current standard-of-care therapies, combining NHT with PARP inhibitors could achieve a significant survival benefit in the first-line setting for mCRPC patients with HRR and BRCA1/2 mutations.

A Phase 2 Trial of Talazoparib and Avelumab in Genomically Defined Metastatic Kidney Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Although different kidney cancers represent a heterogeneous group of malignancies, multiple subtypes including Von Hippel-Lindau (VHL)-altered clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC), fumarate hydratase (FH)- and succinate dehydrogenase (SDH)-deficient renal cell carcinoma (RCC), and renal medullary carcinoma (RMC) are affected by genomic instability. Synthetic lethality with poly ADP-ribose polymerase inhibitors (PARPis) has been suggested in preclinical models of these subtypes, and paired PARPis with immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) may achieve additive and/or synergistic effects in patients with previously treated advanced kidney cancers. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate combined PARPi + ICB in treatment-refractory metastatic kidney cancer. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: We conducted a single-center, investigator-initiated phase 2 trial in two genomically selected advanced kidney cancer cohorts: (1) VHL-altered RCC with at least one prior ICB agent and one vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibitor, and (2) FH- or SDH-deficient RCC with at least one prior ICB agent or VEGF inhibitor and RMC with at least one prior line of chemotherapy. INTERVENTION: Patients received talazoparib 1 mg daily plus avelumab 800 mg intravenously every 14 d in 28-d cycles. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) by Immune Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors at 4 mo, and the secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival, and safety. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Cohort 1 consisted of ten patients with VHL-altered ccRCC. All patients had previously received ICB. The ORR was 0/9 patients; one patient was not evaluable due to missed doses. In this cohort, seven patients achieved stable disease (SD) as the best response. The median PFS was 3.5 mo (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.0, 3.9 mo). Cohort 2 consisted of eight patients; four had FH-deficient RCC, one had SDH-deficient RCC, and three had RMC. In this cohort, six patients had previously received ICB. The ORR was 0/8 patients; two patients achieved SD as the best response and the median PFS was 1.2 mo (95% CI 0.4, 2.9 mo). The most common treatment-related adverse events of all grades were fatigue (61%), anemia (28%), nausea (22%), and headache (22%). There were seven grade 3-4 and no grade 5 events. CONCLUSIONS: The first clinical study of combination PARPi and ICB therapy in advanced kidney cancer did not show clinical benefit in multiple genomically defined metastatic RCC cohorts or RMC. PATIENT SUMMARY: We conducted a study to look at the effect of two medications, talazoparib and avelumab, in patients with metastatic kidney cancer who had disease progression on standard treatment. Talazoparib blocks the normal activity of molecules called poly ADP-ribose polymerase, which then prevents tumor cells from repairing themselves and growing, while avelumab helps the immune system recognize and kill cancer cells. We found that the combination of these agents was safe but not effective in specific types of kidney cancer.

Extrarenal Wilms tumor of the recto-vaginal septum with BRCA2 gene mutation: a case report.

Extrarenal Wilms tumor (ERWT) is rare, and its occurrence in the adult recto-vaginal septum is even more uncommon. Importantly, instances of a BRCA2 gene mutation associated with ERWT have not been documented. In this report, we present an unusual case of ERWT situated in the recto-vaginal septum of a 49-year-old woman, accompanied by a concurrent BRCA2 gene mutation. After the tumor's second recurrence, the patient experienced symptomatic relief after administering poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor therapy. Given the limited exposure and understanding of optimal treatment strategies for this distinct tumor, there is a definite need to accumulate further clinical experiences and insight. Consequently, we propose that genetic testing be considered in cases involving tumor recurrence or metastasis, since this may offer valuable information for identifying targets for therapeutic intervention.

Comparative efficacy of olaparib in combination with or without novel antiandrogens for treating metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.

Background: Studies using novel antiandrogens (NAA) in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) have shown overall survival benefit. As patients develop resistance to NAA therapy, the poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor (PARPi) olaparib in combination with NAA may become a promising therapy. However the overall benefit of olaparib monotherapy or combination therapy still needs to be evaluated. Therefore, we performed a network meta-analysis to assess the efficacy and toxicity between olaparib, olaparib combined with abiraterone and NAA. Methods: We searched PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library and American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) University Meeting abstracts for randomized controlled trials reporting olaparib and NAA from 2010 up to March, 2023. Network meta-analysis using Stata 16.0 and R 4.4.2, hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were used to assess the results. Results: Four trials reported olaparib, olaparib plus abiraterone and apalutamide plus abiraterone. radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS) was significantly lower in patients on apalutamide plus abiraterone compared to olaparib (HR, 1.43; 95% CI, 1.06-1.93). rPFS was similar for olaparib plus abiraterone and olaparib (HR, 1.35; 95% CI, 0.99-1.84); likewise, olaparib plus abiraterone and apalutamide plus abiraterone were similar (HR, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.83-1.35). In addition, there was no significant difference between the three interventions for OS. But olaparib has the highest probability of being a preferred treatment for improving rPFS and OS. Conclusion: rPFS was in favor of olaparib compared with apalutamide plus abiraterone. But there were no difference between olaparib plus abiraterone and either olaparib or apalutamide plus abiraterone. Apalutamide plus abiraterone might be the most preferred intervention in cases where AEs are involved. Systematic review registration: https://inplasy.com, identifier INPLASY2023100072.

Platinum(IV) compounds as potential drugs: a quantitative structure-activity relationship study.

Introduction: Machine learning methods, coupled with a tremendous increase in computer power in recent years, are promising tools in modern drug design and drug repurposing. Methods: Machine learning predictive models, publicly available at chemosophia.com, were used to predict the bioactivity of recently synthesized platinum(IV) complexes against different kinds of diseases and medical conditions. Two novel QSAR models based on the BiS algorithm are developed and validated, capable to predict activities against the SARS-CoV virus and its RNA dependent RNA polymerase. Results: The internal predictive power of the QSAR models was tested by 10-fold cross-validation, giving cross-R2 from 0.863 to 0.903. 38 different activities, ranging from antioxidant, antibacterial, and antiviral activities, to potential anti-inflammatory, anti-arrhythmic and anti-malarial activity were predicted for a series of eighteen platinum(IV) complexes. Conclusion: Complexes 1, 3 and 13 have high generalized optimality criteria and are predicted as potential SARS-CoV RNA dependent RNA polymerase inhibitors.