Optimizing ChatGPT's Interpretation and Reporting of Delirium Assessment Outcomes: Exploratory Study.

BACKGROUND: Generative artificial intelligence (AI) and large language models, such as OpenAI's ChatGPT, have shown promising potential in supporting medical education and clinical decision-making, given their vast knowledge base and natural language processing capabilities. As a general purpose AI system, ChatGPT can complete a wide range of tasks, including differential diagnosis without additional training. However, the specific application of ChatGPT in learning and applying a series of specialized, context-specific tasks mimicking the workflow of a human assessor, such as administering a standardized assessment questionnaire, followed by inputting assessment results in a standardized form, and interpretating assessment results strictly following credible, published scoring criteria, have not been thoroughly studied. OBJECTIVE: This exploratory study aims to evaluate and optimize ChatGPT's capabilities in administering and interpreting the Sour Seven Questionnaire, an informant-based delirium assessment tool. Specifically, the objectives were to train ChatGPT-3.5 and ChatGPT-4 to understand and correctly apply the Sour Seven Questionnaire to clinical vignettes using prompt engineering, assess the performance of these AI models in identifying and scoring delirium symptoms against scores from human experts, and refine and enhance the models' interpretation and reporting accuracy through iterative prompt optimization. METHODS: We used prompt engineering to train ChatGPT-3.5 and ChatGPT-4 models on the Sour Seven Questionnaire, a tool for assessing delirium through caregiver input. Prompt engineering is a methodology used to enhance the AI's processing of inputs by meticulously structuring the prompts to improve accuracy and consistency in outputs. In this study, prompt engineering involved creating specific, structured commands that guided the AI models in understanding and applying the assessment tool's criteria accurately to clinical vignettes. This approach also included designing prompts to explicitly instruct the AI on how to format its responses, ensuring they were consistent with clinical documentation standards. RESULTS: Both ChatGPT models demonstrated promising proficiency in applying the Sour Seven Questionnaire to the vignettes, despite initial inconsistencies and errors. Performance notably improved through iterative prompt engineering, enhancing the models' capacity to detect delirium symptoms and assign scores. Prompt optimizations included adjusting the scoring methodology to accept only definitive "Yes" or "No" responses, revising the evaluation prompt to mandate responses in a tabular format, and guiding the models to adhere to the 2 recommended actions specified in the Sour Seven Questionnaire. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings provide preliminary evidence supporting the potential utility of AI models such as ChatGPT in administering standardized clinical assessment tools. The results highlight the significance of context-specific training and prompt engineering in harnessing the full potential of these AI models for health care applications. Despite the encouraging results, broader generalizability and further validation in real-world settings warrant additional research.

Nothing personal, it's the organization! Links between organizational culture, workplace bullying, and affective commitment.

Extensive attention in organizational research has been dedicated to workplace bullying, primarily focusing on its frequency and impact on both the victim and the bully, emphasizing interpersonal dynamics. This study extends current research by shifting the focus to the organizational level, examining the relationship between organizational culture and affective commitment, mediated by workplace bullying. Utilizing data from two surveys (N = 650 in 2012 and N = 553 in 2017), the study reveals that dimensions of organizational culture, such as assertiveness, performance orientation, and ingroup collectivism significantly influence work-related workplace bullying. Performance orientation and assertiveness are positively associated with increased bullying, whereas ingroup collectivism serves as a deterrent. In turn, work-related bullying negatively impacts affective commitment, while a culture characterized by high ingroup collectivism not only links negatively with bullying but also links positively with affective commitment. This work is one of the first studies to investigate the interplay among several dimensions of organizational culture, workplace bullying, and affective commitment, underscoring the importance of supportive organizational cultures in fostering healthy work environments.

The Influence of Sociodemographic Factors and Clinical Aspects on the Quality of Life of Surgically Treated Patients with Colorectal Cancer.

Introduction: Due to the increasing number of cases and the levels of mortality, colorectal cancer is still a major health problem. Therefore, the growing interest in the quality of life of patients and the assessment of the quality of life of patients with colorectal cancer seems to be particularly important. The aim of the study was to investigate and determine factors that have a significant impact on the QoL of patients who were diagnosed with colorectal cancer that was surgically treated in the Surgical Department of the 4th Military Clinical Hospital in Wroclaw. Methods: 102 respondents were enrolled into the study. The QLQ-C30, QLQ-CR29 as well as an original questionnaire regarding the socioeconomic factors were used for the assessment. The information was supplemented with patients' clinical data. Results: According to the QLQ-C30 questionnaire the average QoL of the respondents was 55%. Factors such as male gender, younger age, higher BMI, no significant weight loss, living with family, lower level of education and being professionally active have significant positive impact on QoL. In contrary, patients with more advanced and malignant cancer with tumor located in the right half of the colon had worse QoL. The particular domains of QoL influenced by these factors were also identified. Determining these factors will allow for more effective treatment, for the shortening of the hospitalization and finally for the reduction of the costs. Conclusion: The better QoL of the patients with colorectal cancer treated surgically showed younger men, living with family and with the support from close people, professionally active, with primary level of education, and without significant weight loss, ie less than 5% of body weight in the last 6 months. Moreover, patients with cancer located in the left colon, at a lower stage, with a lower grading demonstrated a better QoL.

The minimal clinically important difference of two multifaceted fatigue evaluation questionnaires in chronic stroke.

PURPOSE: This research sought to ascertain the Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID) and Robust Clinically Important Difference (RCID) of the Multidimensional Fatigue Symptom Inventory-Short Form (MFSI-SF) and Chalder Fatigue Questionnaire-11 (CFQ-11) as two important concepts for the clinical interpretation of the results in chronic post-stroke population. METHODS: A total of 128 subjects with chronic post-stroke completed the MFSI-SF and CFQ-11 before and after six weeks of intervention. The MCIDs were derived using both anchor- and distribution-based methods; however, only anchor-based methods were used to estimate RCIDs. RESULTS: Anchor-based MCIDs for MFSI-SF and CFQ-11 were in the range of -5 to -6.28 and -2 to -4.56, respectively. Distribution-based MCIDs in MFSI-SF and CFQ-11 were calculated in the range of -4.17 to -24.05 and -1.72 to -7.68, respectively. RCID ranges of -10 to -15 were obtained for the MFSI-SF and -6 to -7.33 for the CFQ-11. CONCLUSION: These findings may have implications for clinical experts in the clinical interpretation of fatigue changes observed in MFSI-SF and CFQ-11 in individuals with chronic stroke.

Association between plant-based diets and risk of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease in Korean adults: A prospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVES: Few studies have investigated the correlation between plant-based diet indices (PDIs) and the risk of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) in the Korean population. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the association between PDIs and the risk of MASLD in Korean adults. METHODS: This cohort study utilized data from the Health Examinees Study conducted in the South Korean population. Dietary and nutrient intake were assessed at baseline and follow-up using a food frequency questionnaire and the Korean Food Consumption Table. Food items were categorized into overall PDI, healthy PDI (hPDI), and unhealthy PDI (uPDI), with MASLD defined using the fatty liver index. Baseline characteristics and food intake groups were evaluated based on PDI quintiles and stratified by sex. Further analyses involved stratification by age, body mass index, alcohol intake, and physical activity in men and women. RESULTS: Over a median follow-up period of 4.2 y, MASLD occurred in 1532 participants. Both men and women in the highest hPDI quintile had a reduced risk of MASLD (men: HR: 0.71, 95% CI: 0.55-0.91, p = 0.0031; women: HR: 0.61, 95% CI: 0.48-0.78, p < 0.0001). Conversely, the highest uPDI quintile was associated with a higher risk of MASLD. CONCLUSIONS: This cohort study revealed an association of the overall PDI and hPDI with a lower risk of MASLD, highlighting the importance of adhering to these types of plant-based diets to prevent MASLD among Korean adults.

Development and Content Validity of Cervicogenic Headache Patient Questionnaire: New Tool for Assessing Severity and Impact.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Cervicogenic headache (CGH) is a complicated and common headache disorder that may present itself with cervical spine dysfunction, irritation of the nerves, central sensitization, and muscular tension. Theoretically, this diagnosis should be an exclusionary diagnosis, considering the fact that it requires extended clinical assessment of the cervical spine and an evaluation for other primary headache types. CGH represents a clinical challenge as they habitually present with an array of nonspecific manifestations highly variable among patients. Management of CGHs is properly based on accurate diagnosis and sound understanding of the complaints of the individual. The development of CGH still carries with it a palpable gap in meaningful literature related to really effective assessment tools for the condition. The aim of the current study was to develop and investigate the validity of the content of the Cervicogenic Headache Patient Questionnaire. This questionnaire is designed especially to measure pain intensity, its impact on daily activities, disturbance in sleep, and the overall quality of life in subjects with CGHs. METHODOLOGY AND RESULTS: The content validity ratio (CVR) and Content Validity Index (CVI) have been used to thoroughly examine the content validity. Each item was rated by 10 experts for relevance and clarity. The scale consists of two main parts: demographic information and symptoms. Under the demographic section, the patient is asked for their age, sex, occupation, and any relevant medical history. The Symptom Checklist contains 10 questions concerning headache frequency, intensity, duration, location, and contributing factors, as well as how headaches affect daily activities, sleep, and quality of life. Item-CVI scores ranged from 0.60 to 1.00, and Scale-CVI/Ave was 0.95, which indicates strong overall content validity. The Scale-CVI/Universal Agreement was 0.83, meaning that most items are of high relevance. The clarity assessments resulted in I-CVI ratings of 1.00 for the majority of items. Using CVR analysis, items 1, 2, 5, 6, 7, and 10 all had a CVR of 1.00, whereas all the rest ranged from 0.40 to 0.80, suggesting unanimous agreement among the experts. CONCLUSION: The results underline the strength of the questionnaire in covering all the critical dimensions of cervicogenic headaches, such as pain, daily functioning, sleep, and quality of life. The scores provided by experts for content validity and clarity were high; hence, it is suitable for use as a comprehensive tool both in clinical and research applications.

Assessment of the Level of Awareness and Degree of Implementation of Central Line Bundles for Prevention of Central Line-associated Blood Stream Infection: A Questionnaire-based Observational Study.

Aim: The objective of this study was to assess the extent of knowledge and application of central line bundles in the intensive care unit (ICU) of a tertiary care hospital for the purpose of avoiding central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSI). This assessment was conducted through the use of a questionnaire. Materials and methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted in the ICU, involving doctors and nurses. The study was observational in nature. The study employed a methodical validated questionnaire to evaluate the level of knowledge, attitude, and practice of central line bundles for the prevention of central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSI). The questionnaire was designed using preexisting awareness surveillance systems, infection control measures, and patient care practices that were specifically relevant to CLABSIs in the ICU. The data were analyzed utilizing SPSS. Results: The research involved a total of 93 healthcare professionals, consisting of 67 physicians and 26 nurses. The mean knowledge score among participants was 82%, with higher scores reported in individuals who had training in central line bundles. Healthcare professionals exhibited robust compliance with hand cleanliness, antiseptic skin preparation prior to insertion, aseptic draping of the patient, utilization of utmost sterile barriers, verification of central venous catheter (CVC) tip placement using chest X-ray or fluoroscopy, and preservation of a sterile environment. Conclusion: The study emphasized the significance of training in enhancing understanding and adherence to central line bundling protocols in ICUs. Participants exhibited a high level of knowledge and commitment to recommended practices, indicating that this training can have a favorable effect on CLABSI rates. How to cite this article: Singh S, Sharma A, Dhawan M, Sharma SP. Assessment of the Level of Awareness and Degree of Implementation of Central Line bundles for Prevention of Central Line-associated Blood Stream Infection: A Questionnaire-based Observational Study. Indian J Crit Care Med 2024;28(9):847-853.

Correlations between clinical parameters and PSQ in children with suspected OSA.

The aim of this study was to measure tonsils and adenoid vegetations, investigate the modified Mallampati score, determine BMI according to body mass and corresponding percentile, and compare these data with the results of the Pediatric Sleep Questionnaire (PSQ). The subjects were children aged 2 to 18 who were indicated for adenotonsillectomy at the Clinic for Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery. A doctor specialist conducted the clinical examinations. According to the PSQ, 75 subjects were divided into two groups: those at high risk and those at low risk for developing obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). The PSQ results showed that 45 subjects (60 %) were at high risk for OSA, and these subjects had significantly lower weight and BMI. Although a higher number of subjects had grade 4 tonsils and grade 3 and 4 adenoids, this distribution was not statistically significant. There was no statistically significant difference in the distribution of the modified Mallampati score when compared with the PSQ results. Lower body mass and BMI were statistically significant risk factors for OSA, while the size of the tonsils and adenoids, as well as the modified Mallampati score, did not show any statistically significant difference in comparison with the PSQ results.

Global Rating of Change for Better or Worse-What Does It Mean When Patients Who Are Treated for Patellofemoral Pain Rate Their Change?

OBJECTIVE: To investigate how a global rating of change (GROC) score corresponds to change in Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) subscales in people with patellofemoral pain (PFP). DESIGN: Secondary analysis of data from 3 clinical trials. METHODS: Four hundred ninety adolescents (10-18 years old) and adults (19-40 years old) with PFP completed KOOS (5 subscales, 0-100) at baseline and 3-month follow-up as well as GROC at 3-month follow-up. GROC category descriptors were mapped to 5 categories: worse, no change, a bit better, better, and much better. Gaussian approximation was then used to calculate the change in KOOS scores for each GROC category. RESULTS: Due to overlap between KOOS scores in "no change" and "a bit better," all analyses were performed on 4 categories. For all KOOS subscales, patients who reported being "worse" had negative KOOS scale change scores (≤ -2); patients reporting "no change" had KOOS scale change scores that ranged from -5 to 14; and patients feeling "better" or "much better" had positive KOOS scale change scores that ranged from 4 to 26 and ≥16, respectively. CONCLUSION: When patients with PFP reported feeling "worse," "better," or "much better," there was a small-to-substantial change across the different KOOS scales. This is in contrast to no difference between reporting "a bit better" or "no change" in KOOS. When patients say they feel a little better, clinicians should be less confident about whether change has truly occurred. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2024;54(10):657-671. Epub 25 July 2024. doi:10.2519/jospt.2024.12120.

Cross-cultural adaptation and test-retest reliability assessment of a Swedish version of the exercise adherence rating scale in patients after shoulder surgery.

BACKGROUND: Adherence to prescribed home exercise is an important predictor for the long-term effectiveness of exercise therapy and therefore important to evaluate. The Exercise Adherence Rating Scale (EARS) is a valid and reliable tool to assess exercise adherence behavior, but it is not translated into Swedish. This study aimed to translate EARS into Swedish and to explore the psychometric properties in terms of test-retest reliability, internal consistency as well and possible floor-/ceiling effects. MATERIALS AND METHODS:   A translation and cultural adaptation process followed international guidelines and resulted in EARS-Sv. A total of 30 patients who had undergone shoulder surgery were included in the study and filled out EARS-Sv at two different time points. The test-retest reliability was evaluated through the weighted kappa coefficient and Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC). Cronbach's alpha was used to assess internal consistency. Floor-/ceiling effects were calculated. RESULTS: The test-retest reliability of the questionnaire was good with ICC (0.79, CI 95%) and moderate with weighted kappa-coefficient (MD= 0.58). Cronbach's alpha was considered good (0.88). A ceiling effect was registered in all 6 items of EARS-Sv. CONCLUSION: EARS-Sv has moderate to good test-retest reliability and good internal consistency in patients who have undergone shoulder surgery.

The postoperative results in orthopaedic patients are often dependent on adherence to postoperative home rehabilitation programs.Exercise Adherence Rating Scale (EARS) is a questionnaire assessing adherence to prescribed home exercise and the Swedish version has an acceptable test-retest reliability and good internal consistency for patients who have undergone shoulder surgery.The Swedish version of EARS could be used as a tool to identify patients having difficulties adhering to the prescribed home exercises.

Psychometric characteristics of the Spanish version of the HIV Symptom Index.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to determine the psychometric properties of the Spanish-language version of the HIV-Symptom Index (HIV-SI) questionnaire in Spanish patients undergoing antiretroviral therapy. METHODS: Between 2014 and 2016, an observational, multicenter, prospective cohort study was conducted in seventeen Spanish hospitals to validate HIV-SI questionnaire in terms of: construct validity (confirmatory factor analysis), internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha), convergent validity (Pearson's correlation coefficient) and Known-group validity. In addition, a sensitivity to change analysis was also performed. RESULTS: A total of 232 patients were included in the study. They had a mean age of 46.17 (SD9.82) and were 75% male. The median overall score for the HIV-SI was 10 (IQR 4- 19.5) and the most common symptoms reported were feelings of nervousness or anxiety, fatigue or energy loss, feeling sad or depressed, stomach pain or bloating, and difficulty sleeping. In the current study, the Spanish HIV-SI questionnaire showed a high internal consistency (α = 0.89) and adequate construct validity (CFI and TLI > 0.90). When contrasted with the MOS-HIV questionnaire, an inverse correlation was found. It showed a good association with the mental (r=-0.61; P < 0.0001) and physical score (r=-0.60; P < 0.0001). In a multivariate analysis, the age of the patient, female condition, hepatitis C coinfection, concomitant treatment and non-adherence resulted in a higher HIV-SI score. CONCLUSIONS: Our study has shown that the Spanish HIV-SI is a valid and reliable self-administered PROM for routine measurement of patient- reported symptoms among Spanish patients on antiretroviral treatment.

Prognostic value of the duke activity Status Index Questionnaire in predicting mortality in patients with chronic heart failure: 36-month follow-up study.

BACKGROUND: The Duke Activity Status Index (DASI) questionnaire has been the focus of numerous investigations - its discriminative and prognostic capacity has been continuously explored, supporting its use in the clinical setting, specifically during rehabilitation in patients with chronic heart failure (CHF).However, studies exploring optimal DASI questionnaire threshold scores are limited. OBJECTIVE: To investigate optimal DASI questionnaire thresholds values in predicting mortality in a CHF cohort and assess mortality rates based on the DASI questionnaire using a thresholds values obtained. METHODOLOGY: This is a prospective cohort study with a 36-month follow-up in patients with CHF. All patients completed a clinical assessment, followed by DASI questionnaire, pulmonary function, and echocardiography. The Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to discriminate the DASI questionnaire score in determining the risk of mortality. For survival analysis, the Kaplan-Meier model was used to explore the impact of ≤/>23 points on mortality occurring during the 36-month follow-up. RESULTS: One hundred and twenty-four patients were included, the majority being elderly men. Kaplan Meier analysis revealed that ≤/> 23 was a strong predictor of CHF mortality over a 36-month follow-up. CONCLUSION: A score of ≤/>23 presents good discriminatory capacity to predict mortality risk in 36 months in patients with CHF, especially in those with reduced or mildly reduced ejection fraction. Age, ejection fraction, DASI questionnaire score and use of digoxin are risk factors that influence mortality in this population.

Dataset on recovered waste post-earthquake 2016 in Manabi Province, Ecuador for recycling and reuse.

The earthquake in Ecuador on 16 April 2016 generated large volumes of debris and waste. This dataset contains data on recovered and reused disaster materials. Data were collected through a census survey of the scrap dealers of earthquake 2016 debris and waste (n = 62). This dataset was compiled to demonstrate how earthquake waste was generated during the 2016 earthquake and compare it with the pre-disaster period 2015 and the 2019 current when the data were collected. The recovered disaster materials include plastic, metal, cardboard, paper, glass, other recyclable materials, and reused materials. Likewise, the database allows us to observe the time response of medium- and small-sized scrap businesses as scrap dealers engage in the commercial transaction of disaster materials, and this dataset shows the process phases of recovering disaster waste. In addition, the dataset includes profit perceptions and factual earnings from scrap businesses after an earthquake. Considering the significant volume of waste and debris generated, this database can provide useful data for evaluating disaster waste management as an important task in post-disaster recovery.

Psychometric properties of the Spanish version of the media health literacy questionnaire (MeHLit-SV).

Introduction: Media health literacy emerges as a response to the vast array of informational disorders prevalent in media communications. Given the absence of a measurement tool for this type of literacy in Spanish-speaking communities, the aim of the present study is to conduct a cross-cultural adaptation of the Media Health Literacy (MeHLit) questionnaire into Spanish and to analyze its psychometric properties in a sample of nursing students. Methods: The Spanish version of the MeHLit questionnaire (MeHLit-SV) was obtained through a process involving translation, back-translation, evaluation of the proposed items by a group of 22 experts, and a pilot study with 80 Spanish nursing students. Content validity was assessed using each item's content validity index (CVI) and Aiken's V (VdA), while internal consistency was evaluated through Cronbach's Alpha. Results: Following the translation and adaptation process, the final version of the MeHLit-SV comprised 21 items organized into five dimensions. The CVI values exceeded 0.82 for all items, and the overall content validity index (S-CVI) was 0.9. Furthermore, the results of Aiken's V surpassed the threshold considered acceptable (0.70). After piloting, the questionnaire demonstrated high internal consistency with a Cronbach's alpha value of 0.936. Conclusion: The findings of this research support the reliability and validity of the MeHLit-SV for use among nursing students to measure their level of media health literacy. This questionnaire, with satisfactory psychometric properties and ease of administration, is an useful tool for assessing whether individuals possess the necessary skills to accurately analyze health information they encounter on a daily basis.

Investigation of current clinical practices and perceptions of patients and caregivers regarding Alport syndrome in South Korea.

Background: Alport syndrome (AS) is a highly prevalent inherited kidney disease. Early diagnosis and intervention are crucial for improved kidney outcomes. This study evaluated awareness among Korean clinicians about AS and assessed the understanding of AS patients and caregivers. Methods: An online survey targeting registered members of the Korean Society of Nephrology, the Korean Society of Pediatric Nephrology, AS patients, and their caregivers was conducted from January to April 2023. Results: Out of 103 respondents, most had treated fewer than 10 AS patients. For certain kidney diseases, such as chronic kidney disease of unknown origin and focal segmental glomerulosclerosis, half or fewer considered AS as a potential diagnosis. Only half preferred immediate confirmation tests for suspected AS. Genetic testing was available at half of the medical centers, and fewer than half of the adult nephrologists considered genetic testing to be essential. While all the surveyed nephrologists would prescribe renin-angiotensin system blockade, the majority hesitated to initiate treatment. Vigilant genetic testing for donor candidates was not a common practice. While 80% of patients and 50% of caregivers understood the nature and prognosis of AS, they regretted the delayed diagnoses, insufficient explanations, and the absence of support groups. Conclusion: Not rarely, AS patients may have been unrecognized as AS. Despite the noteworthy advancement of AS, the recent guidelines have not been widely adopted in clinical practice in Korea. Considering the challenges in Korea, there is an urgent need for locally tailored clinical practice recommendations and a dedicated registry to optimize patient outcomes.

Vocal Fatigue Index (VFI): Cross-Cultural Adaptation, Validation, and Cut-off Values of the Arabic Version.

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to validate, cross-culturally, and linguistically adapt the Vocal Fatigue Index (VFI) into Arabic. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. METHODS: The VFI was translated into Arabic, reverse translated, and content validated. To assess its psychometric properties, 398 patients with voice disorders (199 males, 199 females, mean age=46.2 ± 15.0years) and 121 vocally healthy controls (57 males, 64 females, mean age=42.1 ± 6.9years) completed the VFI-Arabic. We calculated internal consistency and test-retest reliability using Cronbach's alpha and intraclass correlation (ICC) coefficients. Independent sample t tests determined mean factor score differences between groups, while receiver operator characteristic curves analyzed sensitivity, specificity, and cut-off scores for the three factors. RESULTS: The overall Cronbach's alpha was 0.95, across all factors combined, it was 0.68; and for factors 1, 2, and 3, it was 0.95, 0.91, and 0.91, respectively. Test-retest reliability for the subscales was excellent (ICC: 0.97, 0.91, 0.82 for factors 1, 2, and 3). Mean subscale scores were significantly higher in the voice-disordered group than in controls. The area under the curve for factors 1, 2, and 3 was 0.824, 0.759, and 0.646, respectively. Best cut-off scores were ≥14.5 (69.8% sensitivity, 83.1% specificity) for factor 1, ≥3.5 (66.3% sensitivity, 74.4% specificity) for factor 2, and ≥5.5 (60.1% sensitivity, 64.5% specificity) for factor 3. CONCLUSION: The VFI-Arabic is a valid and reliable tool for identifying and quantifying vocal fatigue symptoms in Arabic speakers.

Development of the Japanese version of the Mobile Device Proficiency Questionnaire: A cross-sectional validation study.

AIM: In response to the growing popularity of mobile devices among older adults in Japan, this study aimed to establish a reliable and valid measure of mobile device proficiency by developing a Japanese version of the Mobile Device Proficiency Questionnaire (MDPQ-J) for the Japanese population. METHODS: To evaluate the reliability and validity of the MDPQ-J, we administered the questionnaire to 100 young or middle-aged participants (37.78 ± 13.90 years, 57.00% women), and 62 older participants (75.90 ± 6.01 years; 59.68% women). RESULTS: The MDPQ-J showed a high degree of internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.98). Moreover, MDPQ-J scores in older participants tended to be lower than those in young or middle-aged participants. In terms of validity, the MDPQ-J score of older participants was significantly associated with age (ρ = -0.31), the amount of time using a mobile device per day (ρ = 0.64), and the system usability scale (ρ = 0.39). Additionally, the MDPQ-J scores were significantly positively associated with the importance (ρ = 0.37), performance (ρ = 0.57), and satisfaction (ρ = 0.29) associated with daily mobile device use in older participants. CONCLUSIONS: The high reliability and validity of the MDPQ-J in the Japanese population highlight its utility in adapting mobile devices for older adults, which is crucial in an increasingly digital society. Further research should explore the mediating role of mobile device proficiency in various health-related outcomes. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2024; ••: ••-••.

Internet Addiction and Sleep Quality Among School Children in South India.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Today's internet is an unavoidable component of educational sources, the entertainment field, and telecommunication processes. Internet usage is more likely among adolescents and young adults in the form of surfing, chatting, playing games, and fulfilling their social needs. The present study has been planned to assess the effect of internet addiction (IA) on sleep quality in school children. METHODS: This cross-sectional school-based study was conducted among school students in Pondicherry. A total of 350 school students of both genders studying in grades six to 10 and having access to at least one device with internet for more than one year were recruited from government and private schools located in five randomly selected communes in Pondicherry by convenient sampling method. Assessment of IA was done using Young's Internet Addiction Test (YIAT). The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PQSI) questionnaire assessed the participants' sleep quality. All the data was tested for normality using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. Chi-square and unpaired t-tests were used for analysis. RESULTS: The average age of the participants is 13 years. 49 (26.1%) are children and 139 (73.9%) are adolescents. The majority of them are females belonging to the adolescent age group (169, 89.4%). Around 17 (19.5%) children and 70 (80.5%) adolescents reported mild IA. Thirteen (59.1%) children and nine (40.9%) adolescents reported moderate IA. There is no significant difference in sleep quality between children and adolescents (4±2.33 vs. 3.62±2.61, p=0.37) but there is a considerable difference in their levels of IA (32.98±21.06 vs. 25.6±15.08, p=0.01).  Conclusion: This study found a significant relationship between IA and poor sleep quality among adolescents. Thus, adolescents, parents, school authorities, and researchers should understand the importance of regulating internet usage and encouraging sleep hygiene. Thus, appropriate measures should be taken to address the effects of IA on sleep quality.

Effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on infants' development: analyzing the results of developmental assessments at ages 10-11 and 18-24 months.

The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on infant development. The study investigated the development of infants at 10-11 months of age between 2020 and 2023 by using the Kyoto Scale of Psychological Development-2020 (KSPD2020), an individualized developmental scale, and the Kinder Infant Developmental Scale (KIDS), a developmental questionnaire. We compared the results of the KSPD2020 with those of a pre-pandemic developmental research and compared the developmental age (DA) of KIDS with children's chronological age (CA). Moreover, the same developmental research was conducted again on the same children at 18-24 months of age. DA for receptive language and expressive language was lower in the KIDS compared to CA in the investigation at 10-11 months. However, in the investigation at 18-24 months, there were no areas where KIDS' DA was lower than CA, and DA in the areas of manipulation, receptive language, social relationship with adults, discipline, and eating was higher than CA. On the other hand, using the KSPD2020, there were no differences when compared to pre-pandemic data in the investigation at 10-11 months. Furthermore, the investigation at 18-24 months showed that developmental quotient (DQ) was lower in the Language-Social (L-S) areas than in the investigation at 10-11 months. The lower DQ of L-S in this study was also evident in comparison to the 18-24 months pre-pandemic data. These results suggested that to investigate the medium- and long-term effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on children's development, it is necessary to use not only parent-filled questionnaires but also individualized developmental scales. In addition, the finding that results may differ depending on the method of developmental assessment is considered important not only for developmental researchers but also for professionals involved in supporting children's development.

Translation, cultural debugging, and validation of the Chinese version of the Sour Seven Questionnaire: a cross-sectional study.

Introduction: Intensive care unit delirium (ICUD) is an acute cerebral dysfunction accompanied by a change of level of consciousness, disorientation, and cognitive dysfunction, typically occurring over a short duration ranging from hours to days and resulting from underlying medical causes. Family members may sometimes detect changes in consciousness earlier than medical staff. The Sour Seven Questionnaire is a tool to assist family members in screening for delirium, but there is currently no Chinese version. This study aimed to translate and cross-culturally debug the Sour Seven Questionnaire and test the effectiveness of the Chinese version in screening for ICUD by family members. Methods: To create the Chinese version of the questionnaire, the questionnaire was first translated and then culturally debugged through expert consultation and cognitive interviews. Patients and their family members admitted to three ICUs in a Chinese hospital were selected to test the Chinese version of the Sour Seven Questionnaire and the results were compared with those of the validated and recommended Confusion Assessment Method for the intensive care unit (CAM-ICU) assessment. Results: A total of 190 ICU patients and their families were included in this study. Results of the CAM-ICU assessment showed that 73 (38.4%) patients developed ICUD compared to the 66 (34.7%) using the Chinese version of the Sour Seven Questionnaire, which had a Cohen's kappa coefficient of 0.853, a sensitivity of 0.863, and a specificity of 0.974. The positive predictive value was 0.954 and the negative predictive value was 0.919. Discussion: The Chinese version of the Sour Seven Questionnaire is a valid assessment tool for helping families screen for ICUD, and it is effective in identifying altered consciousness in patients even during online visits.