A New Paradigm in the Management of Scalp Pruritus: Findings From the SCALP-PR Trial.

PURPOSE: The "Impact of scalp pruritus in dermatological consultations in Spain: The SCALP-PR trial" was initiated to address the common yet often insufficiently examined issue of scalp pruritus in dermatology. This condition leads to an uncontrollable urge to scratch, affecting the patients' quality of life and potentially causing scalp damage. This study aimed to explore the prevalence, patient profile, underlying conditios, and therapeutic approaches for scalp pruritus in Spain, and to assess the safety and efficacy profile, as well as the tolerability of a non-pharmacologic treatment. METHODS: From 2021 through 2022, 75 dermatologists enrolled a total of 359 patients in a study on scalp pruritus, approved by the Bellvitge University Hospital Research Ethics Committee, Barcelona, Spain. This evidence-based research combined a meta-analysis with observational study techniques focused on real-world evidence to examine the therapeutic impact on quality of life (QoL). Utilizing the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) for QoL assessments, the study evaluated the effectiveness of the topical product over 15 days. Data collection was conducted via an eCRF and analyzed with statistical methods to provide reliable insights into the management of scalp pruritus. RESULTS: The prevalence of scalp pruritus in Spain was found to be 6.9%, predominantly among women with a mean age of 52.5 years. The leading causes identified were seborrheic dermatitis and pruritus of undetermined etiology or sensitive scalp. Stress was noted as a key factor, with corticosteroids and hygienic measures being common therapies. The topical product demonstrated significant reductions in pruritus and scratching in more than 90% of patients after 15 days. Improvements were also seen in dermatological quality of life, with 87.1% of patients showing enhancements in DLQI scores. The product was well-received thanksto its cosmetic properties, with high ratings in texture, ease of application, and fragrance. CONCLUSION: The topical product studied is a safe, effective, and cosmetically appealing treatment, improving scalp pruritus in various etiologies for most patients. The results highlight the need for patient-center treatments in dermatology, providing important insights for clinical practice and future research.

Real-world evidence study on the impact of SPECT MPI, PET MPI, cCTA and stress echocardiography on downstream healthcare utilisation in patients with coronary artery disease in the US.

BACKGROUND: Coronary artery disease (CAD) is associated with a large clinical and economic burden. However, consensus on the optimal approach to CAD diagnosis is lacking. This study sought to compare downstream healthcare resource utilisation following different cardiac imaging modalities, to inform test selection for CAD diagnosis. METHODS: Claims and electronic health records data from the Decision Resources Group Real-World Evidence US Data Repository were analysed for 2.5 million US patients who underwent single-photon emission computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging (SPECT MPI), positron emission tomography myocardial perfusion imaging (PET MPI), coronary computed tomography angiography (cCTA), or stress echocardiography between January 2016 and March 2018. Patients were stratified into nine cohorts based on suspected or existing CAD diagnosis, pre-test risk, and prior events or interventions. Downstream healthcare utilisation, including additional diagnostic imaging, coronary angiography, and cardiac-related health system encounters, was compared by cohort and index imaging modality. RESULTS: Among patients with suspected CAD diagnosed within 3 months of the index test, PET MPI was associated with lower downstream utilisation; 25-37% of patients who underwent PET MPI required additional downstream healthcare resources compared with 40-49% of patients who received SPECT MPI, 35-41% of patients who underwent cCTA, and 44-47% of patients who received stress echocardiography. Patients who underwent PET MPI experienced fewer acute cardiac events (5.3-9.4%) and generally had lower rates of healthcare encounters (0.8-4.1%) and invasive coronary angiography (ICA, 15.4-24.2%) than those who underwent other modalities. SPECT MPI was associated with more downstream ICA (31.3-38.2%) and a higher rate of cardiac events (9.5-13.2%) compared with PET MPI (5.3-9.4%) and cCTA (6.9-9.9%). Across all cohorts, additional diagnostic imaging was 1.6 to 4.7 times more frequent with cCTA compared with PET MPI. CONCLUSION: Choice of imaging modality for CAD diagnosis impacts downstream healthcare utilisation. PET MPI was associated with lower utilisation across multiple metrics compared with other imaging modalities studied.

The impact of diagnosing provider type on longitudinal care for patients with newly diagnosed Huntington's Disease.

AIMS: This study evaluated the association between provider types for patients with newly diagnosed Huntington's disease (HD) and healthcare resource utilization (HCRU), costs, and treatment patterns. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective analysis used MarketScan® databases (1/1/2017-12/31/21) to identify provider type who diagnosed and managed US adult patients with HD. Patients with continuous enrollment 6 months pre- and 12 months post-diagnosis were included. Outcomes evaluated over 12 months post-diagnosis included hospitalizations, outpatient visits, antipsychotic or vesicular monoamine transporter 2 (VMAT2) inhibitor use, and total healthcare costs. RESULTS: 340 eligible patients had a mean age at diagnosis of 49 years. 56.5% were female; 71.5% had a Charlson Comorbidity Index of 0. Patients were diagnosed by neurologists (48.5%), primary care providers (PCP) (35.6%), psychiatrists (3.5%), or other providers (12.4%). Patients diagnosed by PCPs or neurologists received significantly more follow-ups by the same diagnosing provider type (P < 0.05).All-cause and HD-related outpatient visits at 12-month follow-up had more patients diagnosed by PCPs (23.9, 5.1) than neurologists (18.0, 2.4), psychiatrists (16.7, 1.67), or others (15.3, 2.4). HD-related mean costs totaled $2,489 ($1,179 inpatient and $1,310 outpatient). Patients diagnosed by neurologists had significantly lower HD-related total non-medication costs vs those diagnosed by PCPs (-$2,256; P < 0.05).Among patients diagnosed by neurologists vs PCPs, similar proportions received antipsychotics within the first year (55% vs 52%, respectively); more patients managed by neurologists received VMAT2 inhibitors (12% vs 7%, respectively). LIMITATIONS: Our study includes limitations inherent to retrospective claims studies. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with HD are most often diagnosed by neurologists or PCPs; the same diagnosing provider type typically manages follow-up. Patients diagnosed by neurologists had significantly fewer HD-related outpatient visits, lower HD-related non-drug costs, and more frequently received VMAT2 inhibitors vs those diagnosed by PCPs. Our findings show an integrated care team may provide evidence-based, personalized care for patients with HD.

Huntington's disease is a rare disease that is caused by changes in genes. Symptoms of Huntington's disease are irritability, depression, loss of memory, and issues with movement. The symptoms are different for each person and can happen at different times during the disease. A team of doctors that can help with all the symptoms is important for treating Huntington's disease. In our study we looked at which type of doctor was diagnosing Huntington's disease and if the patient continued to see the same type of doctor. We also looked at whether the costs of the disease were related to the type of doctor that diagnosed the disease. We found that most patients were diagnosed by a primary care doctor or a neurologist (brain doctor), and they continued to see the same doctor. Patients who saw a neurologist had less doctor visits for their HD and also less costs for their HD. These results show having a team of doctors that can help with all symptoms of HD may make it easier for patients to receive the best care for their symptoms.

Real-world effectiveness of first- and second-line anti-angiogenesis therapy in RCC: analysis of a UK-based population.

Aim: Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is the seventh commonest cancer in the UK, where first-line (1L) sunitinib and second-line (2L) axitinib are treatment options.Methods: Retrospective, non-interventional data from the Christie NHS Foundation Trust (Manchester, UK). The primary end point was median progression-free survival (mPFS).Results: For 1L sunitinib (n = 622) and 2L axitinib (n = 121), mPFS (95% CI) was 8.4 (7.6, 9.9) and 6.2 (4.9, 9.3) months, respectively. In 1L, Karnofsky performance status, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), neutrophils, hemoglobin, time from diagnosis to treatment and age were predictors (p < 0.05) of PFS. In 2L, LDH and platelets were predictors of PFS (p < 0.05).Conclusion: Sunitinib and axitinib were effective treatments for RCC. PFS predictors varied between 1L and 2L; LDH was a predictor for both.Clinical Trial Registration: NCT04033991 (ClinicalTrials.gov).

[Box: see text].

Validation Assessment of Privacy-Preserving Synthetic Electronic Health Record Data: Comparison of Original Versus Synthetic Data on Real-World COVID-19 Vaccine Effectiveness.

PURPOSE: To assess the validity of privacy-preserving synthetic data by comparing results from synthetic versus original EHR data analysis. METHODS: A published retrospective cohort study on real-world effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines by Maccabi Healthcare Services in Israel was replicated using synthetic data generated from the same source, and the results were compared between synthetic versus original datasets. The endpoints included COVID-19 infection, symptomatic COVID-19 infection and hospitalization due to infection and were also assessed in several demographic and clinical subgroups. In comparing synthetic versus original data estimates, several metrices were utilized: standardized mean differences (SMD), decision agreement, estimate agreement, confidence interval overlap, and Wald test. Synthetic data were generated five times to assess the stability of results. RESULTS: The distribution of demographic and clinical characteristics demonstrated very small difference (< 0.01 SMD). In the comparison of vaccine effectiveness assessed in relative risk reduction between synthetic versus original data, there was a 100% decision agreement, 100% estimate agreement, and a high level of confidence interval overlap (88.7%-99.7%) in all five replicates across all subgroups. Similar findings were achieved in the assessment of vaccine effectiveness against symptomatic COVID-19 Infection. In the comparison of hazard ratios for COVID 19-related hospitalization and odds ratio for symptomatic COVID-19 Infection, the Wald tests suggested no significant difference between respective effect estimates in all five replicates for all patient subgroups but there were disagreements in estimate and decision metrices in some subgroups and replicates. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, comparison of synthetic versus original real-world data demonstrated good validity and reliability. Transparency on the process to generate high fidelity synthetic data and assurances of patient privacy are warranted.

Monitoring Pregnancies Exposed to Galcanezumab for Migraine in a United States Administrative Claims Database.

PURPOSE: Galcanezumab is a calcitonin gene-related peptide monoclonal antibody indicated for migraine prevention in adults. Due to the long half-life of galcanezumab and the prevalence of migraine in women of childbearing age, galcanezumab exposure may occur during pregnancy. However, real-world use and safety of galcanezumab during pregnancy has not been fully described. To help fill this gap, galcanezumab has two ongoing pregnancy safety studies, one of which is an insurance claims database study. METHODS: This database study is actively identifying and following pregnancies exposed to galcanezumab using commercial claims from the Healthcare Integrated Research Database (HIRD). Patient accrual is planned from September 2018 to June 2026, with a final study report planned for December 2027. This study requires 430 galcanezumab-exposed pregnancies with linked infants to reach power for comparative analysis of major congenital malformations. RESULTS: Recent monitoring of patient accrual, including data from 28 September 2018 to 31 January 2023, identified 207 galcanezumab-exposed pregnancies in women with migraine in the HIRD, of which 110 were live births and 73 of which were linked to an infant. This represents an annual accrual rate of approximately 17 pregnancies linked to infants, which is substantially lower than the 55 required annually to reach target size within current regulatory-committed study timelines. CONCLUSIONS: The accrual of a sufficient number of galcanezumab-exposed pregnancies represents a substantial, but not uncommon, barrier to conducting comparative analyses in pregnancy studies. Potential solutions that would allow for timely dissemination of important safety information to patients and providers may be available.

Alzheimer's Disease Linkage to Real-World Evidence (AD-LINE) Study: Linking Claims Data to Phase 3 GRADUATE Study of Gantenerumab.

BACKGROUND: Linking data from clinical trials and real-world claims may improve the robustness of trial data and provide information on the health, economic, and societal impacts of a disease. OBJECTIVE: To report on the feasibility of linking trial data to Medicare claims data in early symptomatic Alzheimer's disease (AD) in the US. DESIGN AND SETTING: Alzheimer's Disease Linkage to Real-World Evidence (AD-LINE) was a noninterventional cohort study that included participants recruited from the GRADUATE program whose trial data were linked to their Medicare claims. PARTICIPANTS: AD-LINE participants were 66 years and older with early symptomatic AD (ie, mild cognitive impairment [MCI] due to AD or mild AD dementia) and were enrolled in the GRADUATE program and a Medicare fee-for-service or Medicare Advantage plan. MEASUREMENTS: The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services linked participants' clinical trial identifiers to their Medicare beneficiary identifiers using a deterministic, exact matching process. Demographics and clinical characteristics of the AD-LINE cohort at baseline were collected. Outcomes measured in this study included healthcare resource utilization derived from Medicare claims data. RESULTS: In total, 147 participants across 21 US sites were invited to participate and 111 provided informed consent. Of those, 61 patients had linkable data (ie, Medicare beneficiary identifier), Medicare Parts A/B enrollment, and no health maintenance organization (HMO) enrollment in the year before trial entry. Of the 61 participants whose data were analyzed in this study, 30 had MCI due to AD and 31 had mild AD dementia. Participants in the MCI due to AD group had more healthcare resource utilization on average in the baseline period than those in the mild AD dementia group (29.9 [SD, 20.9] vs 24.5 claims [SD, 12.3]). In an ad hoc analysis, a relatively high concordance (85.3%) was seen between the rates of clinically confirmed AD diagnosis and evidence of AD diagnosis in claims data. CONCLUSION: This linkage process may serve as a proof of concept for researchers interested in linking clinical trial and real-world claims data. The lessons learned from AD-LINE and innovation of data linkage approaches may encourage key stakeholders to link data in the future.

Real-world outcomes following ibrutinib dose reduction in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma.

This study used real-world data from three separate United States (US) databases to evaluate dosing patterns and time to next treatment (TTNT) following the first-incident adverse event (AE) in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL/SLL) treated with first-line ibrutinib with and without dose reduction (DR). Median TTNT or death in patients with and without a DR following an AE in each database was as follows: Optum Clinformatics Data Mart (CDM): 59.5 and 30.6 months; ConcertAI: 27.1 and 18.0 months; and Medicare Fee-for-Service (FFS): 49.8 and 22.0 months, respectively. Median TTNT or death in patients with cardiac AEs, with and without a DR, was: Optum CDM: 44.4 and 22.9 months; ConcertAI: 29.9 and 18.3 months; and Medicare FFS: 49.6 and 14.0 months, respectively. Ibrutinib DR was associated with fewer outpatient visits and lower CLL/SLL-related medical costs. These findings suggest that utilizing ibrutinib DR may effectively manage tolerability without compromising clinical efficacy.

Roxadustat for Treating Anemia in Patients with Advanced Chronic Kidney Disease Not Undergoing Dialysis: A Retrospective Study.

Objective Roxadustat, a hypoxia-inducible factor-prolyl hydroxylase inhibitor, increases the hemoglobin (Hb) levels in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). To date, limited clinical studies have focused on the excessive increase in the Hb levels in the early weeks after switching from erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESA) to roxadustat in adult non-dialysis patients. We conducted a retrospective study to examine whether early overshoot frequently occurs after switching to roxadustat. Methods This 8-week retrospective pilot study examined patients with anemic, non-dialyzed CKD who switched from ESA (darbepoetin or epoetin beta pegol) to roxadustat or continued ESA. The Hb levels >12.5 g/dL after starting our observation was defined as Hb overshoot. Patients: Twenty-three patients who switched to roxadustat (roxadustat group) and 63 who continued ESA (ESA group) were included. Results The baseline median estimated glomerular filtration rate and mean Hb levels were 15.7 mL/min/1.73 mShizuokax and 10.77 g/dL in roxadustat group and 15.2 mL/min/1.73 m2 and 10.64 g/dL in ESA group, respectively. Eight patients (34.8%) in the roxadustat group and two patients (3.2%) in the ESA group had Hb overshoot within the 8-week visit (odds ratio: 20.2 [95% confidence interval 3.13-130.0, p<0.01] in the background adjusted model). Among the patients with Hb overshoot in the roxadustat group, the Hb levels were maintained close to baseline 4 weeks after roxadustat discontinuation. A younger age and higher baseline Hb and Hct levels were risk factors for Hb overshoot. Conclusions Hb overshoot was frequently observed in patients switched to roxadustat. Clinicians should be aware of Hb overshoot and emphasize the importance of early Hb level checks.

Drug Review and Approval Policies Based on Real-world Evidence in China and the United States: A Comparative Study.

PURPOSE: The use of real-world evidence (RWE) in regulatory reviews and approvals is currently experiencing significant changes amid increasingly active discussions, primarily reflected in relevant policies, regulations, and guidance documents. However, disparities persist between China and the United States regarding the acceptance and formulation of policies for incorporating real-world data/evidence (RWD/E) in regulatory evaluation and authorization. Furthermore, the current policies lack specific operational details necessary for effective implementation and widespread adoption. METHODS: After conducting a systematic literature review and comparing relevant policies, regulations, and guidelines, as well as the related information published on their official websites, we analyze key aspects of RWE-based drug review and approval policies to highlight similarities and differences in these policies between China and the United States. FINDINGS: This paper reviews the frameworks and existing guidelines in China and the U.S., discussing similarities and differences observed in key policy aspects, including relevant definitions, data sources, data standards, data quality, and connectivity, information requirements, study design, personnel training, and communication, including an example of the application of RWE in drug review and approval processes. IMPLICATIONS: Further develop and refine RWE policies, encourage cooperation, and share best practices and successful examples to enhance the effectiveness of policy implementation and increase its social acceptance.

A scalable approach to assess the safety of recently marketed systemic treatments for atopic dermatitis in clinical practice.

Targeted systemic immune-modulating drugs (IMDs) to treat atopic dermatitis (AD) were highly efficacious in randomized trials. Trials with limited number of subjects leave questions about their safety. We describe a data and analytics structure for the production of timely, high-quality evidence on the comparative safety of recently approved IMDs in patients with AD in clinical practice. We established a series of sequential propensity score (PS)-balanced cohorts that grow in size with each annual data refresh. Nine health outcomes of interest plus conjunctivitis as a positive tracer outcome were identified. The initial treatment comparison was dupilumab, an interleukin-4/13 inhibitor, or tralokinumab, an interleukin-13 inhibitor, versus abrocitinib/upadacitinib, both JAK inhibitors. The first analysis cycle (December 2021-February 2023) compared 269 patients initiating JAK inhibitors and 2,650 initiating IL-4/IL-13 inhibitors. Patient characteristics were well balanced after PS-matching. Outpatient infections within 180 days occurred in 18% of JAK-1 inhibitor initiators versus 12% of dupilumab/ tralokinumab initiators (RR=1.50; 0.96 to 2.33) whereas acne risks were 7% vs. 3%, respectively (RR=2.29, 0.96 to 5.46). This sequential monitoring system will produce essential knowledge on the safety of IMDs to treat AD based on its growing study size of patients observed in clinical practice.

Use of transportability methods for real-world evidence generation: a review of current applications.

Aim: To evaluate how transportability methods are currently used for real-world evidence (RWE) generation to inform good practices and support adoption and acceptance of these methods in the RWE context. Methods: We conducted a targeted literature review to identify studies that transported an effect estimate of the clinical effectiveness or safety of a biomedical exposure to a target real-world population. Records were identified from PubMed-indexed articles published any time before 25 July 2023 (inclusive). Two reviewers screened abstracts/titles and reviewed the full text of candidate studies to identify the final set of articles. Data on the therapeutic area, exposure(s), outcome(s), original and target populations and details of the transportability analysis (e.g., analytic method used, estimate transported, stated assumptions) were abstracted from each article. Results: Of 458 unique records identified, six were retained in the final review. Articles were published during 2021-2023, focused on the US/Canada context, and covered a range of therapeutic areas. Four studies transported an RCT effect estimate, while two transported effect estimates derived from real-world data. Almost all articles used weighting methods to transport estimates. Two studies discussed all transportability assumptions, and one evaluated the likelihood of meeting all assumptions and the impact of potential violations. Conclusion: The use of transportability methods for RWE generation is an emerging and promising area of research to address evidence gaps in settings with limited data and infrastructure. More transparent and rigorous reporting of methods, assumptions and limitations may increase the use and acceptability of transportability for producing robust evidence on treatment effectiveness and safety.

Real-world data for marginal zone lymphoma patients in the French REALYSA cohort: The REALMA study.

Marginal Zone Lymphoma (MZL) comprises three subtypes: extranodal MZL (EMZL), splenic MZL (SMZL) and nodal MZL (NMZL). Since clinical trials have limited representativeness, there is a need for real-world data (RWD) evidence in MZL. Real-world data in Lymphoma and survival in Adults (REALYSA) is a prospective multicentric French cohort of newly diagnosed lymphoma patients. This study consists of the first abstraction of MZL patients prospectively included in REALYSA between 12/2018 and 01/2021 with at least 1 year of follow-up. It provides a landscape description of clinical characteristics, initial workup, quality of life and first-line therapy performed in routine practice. Among 207 included patients, 122 presented with EMZL, 51 with SMZL and 34 with NMZL. At baseline, median age was 67 years (range 28-96), and patients reported a favorable global health status (75/100 (IQR 58,83)) - which was higher in NMZL and lower in SMZL patients (p = 0.006). 18FDG-PET/CT was frequently performed at initial workup (EMZL 72%, SMZL 73%, NMZL 85%). Active surveillance was the initial management for 58 (28%) patients. The most prescribed therapies were rituximab-chlorambucil in the EMZL population (30%), rituximab monotherapy in the SMZL population (37%) and R-CHOP (24%)/bendamustine-rituximab (15%) in the NMZL population. At end of first line, overall response rate was 93% among treated patients with 75% of complete response. This French nationwide study provided for the first time prospective RWD on clinical characteristics, initial management and treatment response of MZL patients.

Advancing the role of real-world evidence in comparative effectiveness research.

Aim: Comparative effectiveness research (CER) is essential for making informed decisions about drug access. It provides insights into the effectiveness and safety of new drugs compared with existing treatments, thereby guiding better healthcare decisions and ensuring that new therapies meet the real-world needs of patients and healthcare systems. Objective: To provide a tool that assists analysts and decision-makers in identifying the most suitable analytical approach for answering a CER question, given specific data availability contexts. Methods: A systematic literature review of the scientific literature was performed and existing regulatory and health technology assessment (HTA) guidance were evaluated to identify and compare recommendations and best practices. Based on this review a methods flowchart that synthesizes current practices and requirements was proposed. Results: The review did not find any papers that clearly identified the most appropriate analytical approach for answering CER questions under various conditions. Therefore, a methods flowchart was designed to inform analyst and decision makers choices starting from a well-defined scientific question. Conclusion: The proposed methods flowchart offers clear guidance on CER methodologies across a range of settings and research needs. It begins with a well-defined research question and considers multiple feasibility aspects related to CER. This tool aims to standardize methods, ensure rigorous and consistent research quality and promote a culture of evidence-based decision-making in healthcare.

Effects of SGLT2 inhibitors on the onset of esophageal varices and extrahepatic cancer in type 2 diabetic patients with suspected MASLD: a nationwide database study in Japan.

BACKGROUND & AIM: SGLT2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) improve hepatic steatosis in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and MASLD. We aimed to investigate the impact of SGLT2i on the incidence of liver-related events and extrahepatic cancer compared to DPP4 inhibitors (DPP4i) in patients with T2DM and suspected MASLD using a medical claims database in Japan. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study using a Japanese medical claims database. Among patients with T2DM who were prescribed SGLT2i or DPP4i (n = 1,628,656), patients with suspected MASLD were classified into SGLT2i (n = 4204) and DPP4i (n = 4204) groups. Effects of SGLT2i on the following outcomes were compared to DPP4i: (1) changes in HbA1c and ALT levels after 6 months, (2) changes in hepatic fibrosis index, and (3) the incidence of liver-related events/extrahepatic cancer over 12 months. RESULTS: After 6 months, DPP4i significantly decreased HbA1c levels compared to SGLT2i. In contrast, SGLT2i significantly decreased ALT levels compared to DPP4i. SGLT2i significantly decreased FIB-4 index compared to DPP4i over 12 months. Although no significant difference was observed in the incidence of overall liver-related events between the two groups, SGLT2i significantly reduced the incidence of esophageal varices (HR 0.12, 95%CI 0.01-0.95, P = 0.044). Moreover, SGLT2i significantly suppressed the incidence of extrahepatic cancer (HR 0.50, 95%CI 0.30-0.84, P = 0.009) compared to DPP4i. CONCLUSION: SGLT2i was more beneficial than DPP4i in improving the hepatic inflammation and fibrosis indices. Moreover, SGLT2i suppressed the incidence of esophageal varices and extrahepatic cancer compared to DPP4i. SGLT2i may suppress life-threatening events in patients with T2DM and suspected MASLD.

Diagnosis, treatment and burden in advanced ovarian cancer: a UK real-world survey of healthcare professionals and patients.

Aim: Little is known regarding uptake of epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) treatments or patient burden in UK real-world practice.Methods: Cross-sectional surveys of patients with advanced EOC and healthcare professionals (HCPs).Results: 101 HCPs and 142 patients participated. Time from initial primary care consultation to diagnosis was ∼7 weeks. 83% patients were offered hereditary genetic testing, with 89% uptake. 53% HCPs reported surgery was performed ≤1 month in non-neoadjuvant setting. Surgery delay negatively impacted patient quality of life (61%), mental health (89%), and surgical outcomes (63%). 56% patients received active first-line maintenance treatment; patients on active surveillance had greater emotional/psychological distress.Conclusion: Treatment delays and low uptake of active first-line treatment should be addressed. Emotional support must be readily accessible throughout treatment.

What is this article about? New treatments for ovarian cancer mean that patients could be treated and live with the disease for many years. However, not much is known about the treatments that are actually received by patients with ovarian cancer in real-life. These surveys were done to learn more about the treatment and experience of patients with ovarian cancer in the UK.What were the results? 101 healthcare professionals (HCPs) and 142 patients took the surveys. The surveys found that patients usually waited about 7 weeks from their first GP visit to diagnosis of ovarian cancer. Half of HCPs reported that patients had surgery within 1 month of the decision that surgery was needed. HCPs reported that delays in surgery had a negative impact on patient quality of life, mental health, and the success of the surgery. After finishing their first line of chemotherapy, about half of patients had a maintenance treatment to control their ovarian cancer and give them as long as possible between recurrences. The remaining patients were not given treatment but were watched for further signs of cancer. Patients on maintenance treatment experienced less emotional/psychological distress than those managed by watchful waiting.What do the results of the study mean? This survey shows that more needs to be done to make sure that patients with ovarian cancer in the UK are diagnosed and treated quickly and offered the right treatment. Emotional support should be available to patients during their treatment.

Semaglutide use in people with obesity and type 2 diabetes from real-world utilization data: An analysis of the All of US Program.

AIM: To analyse data from the All of Us Research Program to evaluate the real-world application and long-term effectiveness of semaglutide in treating type 2 diabetes and obesity patients in a large population. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We identified patients prescribed semaglutide and analysed differences in route of administration and the time on semaglutide. For individuals diagnosed with obesity, we measured changes in body mass index (BMI) and weight from baseline, while measured changes in HbA1c for those patients with type 2 diabetes. We also examined the occurrence of newly diagnosed common adverse events from taking semaglutide. RESULTS: For 3739 semaglutide patients, those on injectable semaglutide (3364 patients) averaged 301.54 days on the medication, with 20.36% having no end date, while those on oral semaglutide (435 patients) averaged 172.48 days, with 24.60% having no end date. We found average decreases of 1.54 kg/m2 in BMI, 4.65 kg in weight and 0.75% in HbA1c for semaglutide users. The decreases were larger in participants taking injectable formulation, probably because of higher starting values. Over time, improvements in these outcomes diminished, but the values remained significantly lower than baseline levels. Approximately only 1.0% of patients reported newly diagnosed common adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Consistent with clinical trial findings, this real-world data analysis showed that semaglutide was well tolerated and that, for a large population, it effectively reduced BMI, body weight and HbA1c, albeit to smaller magnitudes than observed in clinical trials. These findings provide valuable insights into real-world experience and the long-term effectiveness of semaglutide.

The effectiveness and sustainability of health outcomes from a holistic digital weight-loss service with concomitant initiation of tirzepatide: A pragmatic randomized controlled trial in the UK.

AIM: To measure the effectiveness and sustainability of the Juniper UK digital weight-loss service (DWLS), which delivers 6 months of personalized, proactive lifestyle coaching supplemented with tirzepatide to patients through a multidisciplinary team (MDT). METHODS: An observer-blinded randomized controlled trial (RCT) will be conducted on a cohort of non-diabetic patients of the Juniper DWLS in the UK. Participants in both the intervention and control groups will receive weekly subcutaneous injections of 2.5 mg tirzepatide for 4 weeks, uptitrating the dose to 5.0 mg from weeks 5 to 8, and by 2.5 mg every 4 weeks until reaching 15 mg in week 21, which they will maintain until the end of the intervention period at 6 months, when participants will be taken off the medication. The intervention group will receive personalized weeklylifestyle coaching with a focus on protein intake and resistance training for 6 months. Participants in the control group will attend a diet and exercise group counselling session at programme inception and will be sent a summary of the session's content at months 2 and 4. Aside from these events, health coaches will only interact with control group participants on a reactive basis. From month 6 to month 12, participants from both groups will no longer have access to their MDTs. The trial's co-primary endpoints include weight loss, fat-free to fat-mass ratio and composite strength measures at 12 months (6 months following the end of treatment), compared with baseline. Secondary endpoints include percentage change in weight, fat-free to fat-mass ratio, and composite strength from baseline to 6 months, side effect incidence, and change in cardiometabolic risk factors at 12 months. Quality of life and programme engagement represent the study's exploratory endpoints. RESULTS: A total of 688 participants enrolled in the study, with a mean age of 44.6 (± 11.4) years and a mean body mass index of 34.8 (± 7.5) kg/m2; 81.0% of participants are women, and 72.8% are of White ethnicity. More than three-quarters of participants have at least one co-morbidity, with dyslipidaemia (42.4%), hypertension (35.3%) and high cholesterol (31.8%) being the most prevalent conditions. CONCLUSIONS: This RCT will be the first to assess the effectiveness and sustainability of a real-world intensive, multidisciplinary DWLS, and it should highlight the potential of such a service for long-term obesity treatment compared with programmes that deliver standard health counselling.

Generating real-world evidence on diabetes technology using the CareLink Personal data management system.

AIM: To establish trust in real-world evidence (RWE) derived from CareLink Personal (CP), Medtronic's data management system for MiniMed system users, we show that this database and its analyses strictly adhere to the principles of RWE. METHODS: The methodology is applicable to all MiniMed iterations. We described every step from raw data to predefined outcomes. In addition, we showed CP's fitness-for-research by the below metrics (using last year's MiniMed 780G system data as a case study): representative population, relevant endpoints, appropriate granularity, high data completeness, high data representativity and consistency in results. RESULTS: The process from raw data to outcomes has been validated, and metrics/logics adhere to established definitions. Over 95% of users have a CP account; with 96% providing consent, this allows the use of >91% of the census population. There is no rationale for an over-representation of a specific phenotype among users not included. CP includes >50 endpoints, including 'International Consensus on Time in Range' based metrics. Data are recorded at 5-min intervals (maximum 288 per day), and on average there were 263 data points per person per day. Ninety-nine per cent of uploads were automated. For the last year, only 1 in 6 users had a data gap >1 day, and 1 in 50 had a gap >1 week. The time in range from in-silico studies was similar to that of real-world studies from different geographies and with ever growing populations. CONCLUSION: RWE from CP adheres to the principles of RWE and can serve as robust evidence on the performance and safety of MiniMed systems.