CAR-T therapy pulmonary adverse event profile: a pharmacovigilance study based on FAERS database (2017-2023).

Background: Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy, a rapidly emerging treatment for cancer that has gained momentum since its approval by the FDA in 2017, involves the genetic engineering of patients' T cells to target tumors. Although significant therapeutic benefits have been observed, life-threatening adverse pulmonary events have been reported. Methods: Using SAS 9.4 with MedDRA 26.1, we retrospectively analyzed data from the Food and Drug Administration's Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database, covering the period from 2017 to 2023. The analysis included the Reporting Odds Ratio Proportional Reporting Ratio Information Component and Empirical Bayes Geometric Mean to assess the association between CAR-T cell therapy and adverse pulmonary events (PAEs). Results: The FAERS database recorded 9,400 adverse events (AEs) pertaining to CAR-T therapies, of which 940 (10%) were PAEs. Among these CAR-T cell-related AEs, hypoxia was the most frequently reported (344 cases), followed by respiratory failure (127 cases). Notably, different CAR-T cell treatments demonstrated varying degrees of association with PAEs. Specifically, Tisa-cel was associated with severe events including respiratory failure and hypoxia, whereas Axi-cel was strongly correlated with both hypoxia and tachypnea. Additionally, other CAR-T therapies, namely, Brexu-cel, Liso-cel, Ide-cel, and Cilta-cel, have also been linked to distinct PAEs. Notably, the majority of these PAEs occurred within the first 30 days post-treatment. The fatality rates varied among the different CAR-T therapies, with Tisa-cel exhibiting the highest fatality rate (43.6%), followed by Ide-cel (18.8%). Conclusion: This study comprehensively analyzed the PAEs reported in the FAERS database among recipients of CAR-T cell therapy, revealing conditions such as hypoxia, respiratory failure, pleural effusion, and atelectasis. These CAR-T cell therapy-associated events are clinically significant and merit the attention of clinicians and researchers.

Initial dosage optimization of olanzapine in patients with bipolar disorder based on model-informed precision dosing: a study from the real world.

Objectives: Olanzapine is used for treating bipolar disorder (BPD); however, the optimal initial dosing regimen is unclear. The present study aimed to investigate the optimal olanzapine initial dosage in patients with BPD via model-informed precision dosing (MIPD) based on a real-world study. Methods: Thirty-nine patients with BPD from the real-world study were collected to construct the MIPD model. Results: Weight, combined used quetiapine influenced olanzapine clearances in patients with BPD, where the clearance rates were 0.152:1 in patients with or without quetiapine under the same weight. We simulated olanzapine doses once a day or twice a day, of which twice a day was optimal. Without quetiapine, for twice-a-day olanzapine doses, 0.80, 0.70, and 0.60 mg/kg/day were suitable for 40- to 56-kg BPD patients, 56- to 74-kg BPD patients, and 74- to 100-kg BPD patients, respectively. With quetiapine, for twice-a-day olanzapine doses, 0.05 mg/kg/day was suitable for 40- to 100-kg BPD patients. Conclusion: This study was the first to investigate the optimal olanzapine initial dosage in patients with BPD via MIPD based on a real-world study, providing clinical reference for the precision medication of olanzapine in BPD patients.

Efficacy and safety of pralsetinib in patients with RET fusion positive non-small cell lung cancer: An observational real world study.

BACKGROUND: Pralsetinib, a selective RET targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), has been approved for treating locally advanced or metastatic RET fusion-positive NSCLC in adults who have previously received platinum-based chemotherapy in China. METHODS: In this retrospective analysis conducted at Hunan Cancer Hospital in China, we examined 36 patients with advanced NSCLC with RET fusion, who were treated with pralsetinib between January 2021 and December 2023. The study focused on assessing the efficacy (Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS)) and safety profile of pralsetinib in these patients. Statistical analyses were conducted using SPSS version 20.0, with a significance level set at p < 0.05. RESULTS: The results revealed that pralsetinib exhibited significant activity in this patient cohort. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis indicated a median PFS of 10.7 months and a median OS of 21.2 months. The overall response rate(ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) was 55.6 % and 72.2 %, respectively. Pralsetinib was generally well tolerated, with most adverse events being mild to moderate (grades 1-2). The most common serious adverse events (≥grade 3) observed were lymphopenia (13.9 %), hypertension (11.1 %), leukopenia (8.3 %), neutropenia (8.3 %), and creatine kinase elevation (8.3 %). CONCLUSION: Pralsetinib demonstrated promising activity in patients with advanced NSCLC harboring RET fusion with a favorable safety profile.

Analytical Methods for Comparing Uncontrolled Trials with External Controls from Real-World Data: a Systematic Literature Review and Comparison to European Regulatory and Health Technology Assessment Practice.

OBJECTIVES: To provide an overview of analytical methods in scientific literature for comparing uncontrolled medicine trials to external controls from individual patient-level real-world data (IPD-RWD). In addition, to compare these methods with recommendations made in guidelines from European regulatory and health technology assessment (HTA) organizations and with their evaluations described in assessment reports. METHODS: A systematic literature review (until March 1st 2023) in PubMed and Connected Papers was performed to identify analytical methods for comparing uncontrolled trials with external controls from IPD-RWD. These methods were compared descriptively to methods recommended in method guidelines and encountered in assessment reports of the European Medicines Agency (2015-2020) and four European HTA organizations (2015-2023). RESULTS: Thirty-four identified scientific articles described analytical methods for comparing uncontrolled trial data to IPD-RWD-based external controls. The various methods covered controlling for confounding and/or dependent censoring, correction for missing data; and analytical comparative modelling methods. Seven guidelines also focused on research design, RWD quality and transparency aspects, and four of those recommended analytical methods for comparisons with IPD-RWD. The methods discussed in regulatory (n=15) and HTA (n=35) assessment reports were often based on aggregate data and lacked transparency due to the few details provided. CONCLUSION: Literature and guidelines suggest a methodological approach to comparing uncontrolled trials with external controls from IPD-RWD similar to target trial emulation, using state-of-the-art methods. External controls supporting regulatory and HTA decision-making were rarely in line with this approach. Twelve recommendations are proposed to improve the quality and acceptability of these methods.

Adopting a Framework for Rapid Real-World Data Analyses in Safety Signal Assessment.

The expanding availability of real-world data (RWD) has led to an increase in both the interest and possibilities for using this information in postmarketing safety analyses and signal management. While there is enormous potential value from the safety insights generated through RWD, the analysis preparation, execution, and communication required to reliably deliver the evidence can be time consuming. Since the safety signal assessment process is a regulated and timebound process, any supporting RWD analyses require a rapid turnaround of well-designed and informative results. To address this challenge, a TransCelerate BioPharma working group was formed and developed a framework to help teams responsible for safety signal assessment overcome the challenges of working with RWD rapidly to deliver analyses within regulatory timelines. Here, a previously performed safety assessment was evaluated within the context of the developed framework to illustrate how the framework may be adopted in practice.

Two assumptions of the prior event rate ratio approach for controlling confounding can be evaluated by self-controlled case series and dynamic random intercept modeling.

OBJECTIVES: The prior event rate ratio (PERR) is a recently developed approach for controlling confounding by measured and unmeasured covariates in real-world evidence research and observational studies. Despite its rising popularity in studies of safety and effectiveness of biopharmaceutical products, there is no guidance on how to empirically evaluate its model assumptions. We propose two methods to evaluate two of the assumptions required by the PERR, specifically, the assumptions that occurrence of outcome events does not alter the likelihood of receiving treatment, and that earlier event rate does not affect later event rate. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: We propose using self-controlled case series (SCCS) and dynamic random intercept modeling (DRIM), respectively, to evaluate the two aforementioned assumptions. A nonmathematical introduction of the methods and their application to evaluate the assumptions are provided. We illustrate the evaluation with secondary analysis of deidentified data on pneumococcal vaccination and clinical pneumonia in The Gambia, West Africa. RESULTS: SCCS analysis of data on 12,901 vaccinated Gambian infants did not reject the assumption of clinical pneumonia episodes had no influence on the likelihood of pneumococcal vaccination. DRIM analysis of 14,325 infants with a total of 1719 episodes of clinical pneumonia did not reject the assumption of earlier episodes of clinical pneumonia had no influence on later incidence of the disease. CONCLUSION: The SCCS and DRIM methods can facilitate appropriate use of the PERR approach to control confounding. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY: The prior event rate ratio is a promising approach for analysis of real-world data and observational studies. We propose two statistical methods to evaluate the validity of two assumptions it is based on. They can facilitate appropriate use of the prior even rate ratio.

Sequential vs. concurrent systemic therapies in combination with FOLFOX-HAIC for locally advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: a single-center, real-world cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Tri-combination therapy based on hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) of infusion fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX-HAIC) plus immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) for the locally advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients have been proven effective. However, whether it was best for these HCC patients to start with the most potent therapeutic pattern was still under debate. This retrospective study evaluated the efficacy and safety of FOLFOX-HAIC combined with systemic therapies in the patterns of sequential and concurrent schedules. METHODS: This real-world study included 117 unresectable HCC patients who initially received either FOLFOX-HAIC monotherapy (HAIC group, n = 44) or concurrent ICIs and TKIs (ConHAIC group, n = 73) from March 2020 and June 2022, during the period of FOLFOX-HAIC monotherapy in HAIC group, patients in the HAIC group (n = 30) experienced progressive disease (PD) would have their treatment pattern converted from the FOLFOX-HAIC monotherapy to the combination of FOLFOX-HAIC plus ICIs and TKIs sequentially (SeqHAIC group). The progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), as primary outcomes, were compared between patients in the SeqHAIC and ConHAIC groups. RESULTS: The median follow-up time of the SeqHAIC group was 24.92 months (95% CI, 12.74-37.09 months) and of the ConHAIC group was 17.87 months (95% CI, 16.85-18.89 months) and no significant difference was observed in both PFS (HR, 1.572; 95% CI, 0.848-2.916; p = 0.151) and OS (HR, 1.212; 95% CI, 0.574-2.561; p = 0.614) between the SeqHAIC and the ConHAIC groups. As for the tumor responses, there was no significant difference between the two groups regarding tumor responses, overall response rates (p = 0.658) and disease control rates (p = 0.641) were 50.0%, 45.2%, and 83.3%, 89.0% for the SeqHAIC and the ConHAIC groups, respectively. CONCLUSION: Our study revealed that sequential systemic ICIs and TKIs in combination with FOLFOX-HAIC provides similar long-term prognosis and better tolerability compared to concurrent therapy for locally advanced HCC patients. Prospective studies with a larger sample size and longer follow-up are required to validate these findings.

Real-world data to support post-market safety and performance of embolization coils: evidence generation from a medical device manufacturer and data institute partnership.

BACKGROUND: Recognizing the limitations of pre-market clinical data, regulatory authorities have embraced total product lifecycle management with post-market surveillance (PMS) data to assess medical device safety and performance. One method of proactive PMS involves the analysis of real-world data (RWD) through retrospective review of electronic health records (EHR). Because EHRs are patient-centered and focused on providing tools that clinicians use to determine care rather than collecting information on individual medical products, the process of transforming RWD into real-world evidence (RWE) can be laborious, particularly for medical devices with broad clinical use and extended clinical follow-up. This study describes a method to extract RWD from EHR to generate RWE on the safety and performance of embolization coils. METHODS: Through a partnership between a non-profit data institute and a medical device manufacturer, information on implantable embolization coils' use was extracted, linked, and analyzed from clinical data housed in an electronic data warehouse from the state of Indiana's largest health system. To evaluate the performance and safety of the embolization coils, technical success and safety were defined as per the Society of Interventional Radiology guidelines. A multi-prong strategy including electronic and manual review of unstructured (clinical chart notes) and structured data (International Classification of Disease codes), was developed to identify patients with relevant devices and extract data related to the endpoints. RESULTS: A total of 323 patients were identified as treated using Cook Medical Tornado, Nester, or MReye embolization coils between 1 January 2014 and 31 December 2018. Available clinical follow-up for these patients was 1127 ± 719 days. Indications for use, adverse events, and procedural success rates were identified via automated extraction of structured data along with review of available unstructured data. The overall technical success rate was 96.7%, and the safety events rate was 5.3% with 18 major adverse events in 17 patients. The calculated technical success and safety rates met pre-established performance goals (≥ 85% for technical success and ≤ 12% for safety), highlighting the relevance of this surveillance method. CONCLUSIONS: Generating RWE from RWD requires careful planning and execution. The process described herein provided valuable longitudinal data for PMS of real-world device safety and performance. This cost-effective approach can be translated to other medical devices and similar RWD database systems.

Risk of antimuscarinic initiation with cholinesterase inhibitor use in Alzheimer's disease.

BACKGROUND: The use of cholinesterase inhibitors (CHEIs) is commonly associated with urinary incontinence in patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD). This study evaluated the risk of antimuscarinic initiation drugs with the use of CHEIs in AD patients. METHODS: The study used a nested case-control study design involving 2013-2015 Medicare data of AD patients 65 years and older without antimuscarinic use in 2013. Cases were defined as those who initiated antimuscarinic treatment in 2014-2015. Controls with no antimuscarinic use were selected through incidence density sampling and matched to cases on age using a variable-ratio method. The CHEI utilization pattern was classified as current (event-30 days), recent (event-31 to event-90 days), and past (event-91 to event-180 days). Conditional logistic regression was used to assess the association between CHEI use and the risk of antimuscarinic initiation. RESULTS: This study included 1,909 cases and 9,064 controls. The adjusted model found that overall CHEI (Adjusted Odds Ratio [aOR] = 1.90, 95 % Confidence Interval [CI]: 1.58-2.28) and current CHEI use (aOR = 1.62, 95 % CI: 1.18-2.21) were associated with an increase in the risk of antimuscarinic initiation compared to non-CHEI use. In addition, the current use of donepezil and rivastigmine significantly increased the risk of antimuscarinic initiation by 48 % (95 % CI: 1.03-2.12) and 171 % (95 % CI: 1.46-5.03), respectively. CONCLUSION: The study found an increased risk of antimuscarinic initiation with the current use of CHEIs, particularly with donepezil and rivastigmine. These findings underscore the need for careful medication management to minimize prescribing cascades and associated consequences in AD.

Is therapeutic drug monitoring a dancing partner for TNF-α inhibitors in real-world practice? Answers from an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: This systematic review aimed to determine the effect of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) for tumor necrosis factor-α inhibitors (TNF-αI) in immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMIDs) based on real-world evidence, as results from published meta-analyses based on randomized controlled trials (RCTs) may not fully capture the nuances of clinical practice due to strict criteria. METHODS: We searched PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library up to 1 August 2023. Cohort studies comparing TDM (proactive and reactive) with empirical management were included. Primary outcome was effectiveness [for IBDs: clinical remission; for rheumatic diseases: clinical remission or low disease activity], with certainty of evidence appraised using the GRADE approach. Secondary outcomes included treatment failure, serious adverse events (SAEs), IMIDs-related surgeries or hospitalizations, and anti-drug antibodies (ADAs) development risk. RESULTS: Twenty-four cohort studies were included and almost all were on infliximab. For IBDs, compared with empirical management, proactive TDM significantly improved clinical remission (RR = 1.15, 95% CI = 1.04-1.28), reduced IBDs-related surgeries (RR = 0.46, 95% CI = 0.26-0.81), hospitalizations (RR = 0.60, 95% CI = 0.43-0.83), SAEs (RR = 0.23, 95% CI = 0.07-0.76), and ADAs development risk (RR = 0.34, 95% CI = 0.19-0.60). Reactive TDM significantly lowered hospitalization rates and might be cost-effective. Proactive TDM outperformed reactive TDM in secondary outcomes. For rheumatic diseases, benefits of TDM were inconclusive due to limited evidence. CONCLUSIONS: Real-world evidence supports proactive TDM of TNF-αI (particularly infliximab) in IBDs to improve effectiveness, safety, and immunogenicity. However, benefits of TDM for different TNF-αI in other IMIDs remain uncertain. PROTOCOL REGISTRATION: www.crd.york.ac.uk/ PROSPERO identifier is CRD42022370846.

A Retrospective Cohort Study to Determine Real-World Treatment Patterns in Patients with Sézary Syndrome in the United States.

INTRODUCTION: Sézary syndrome (SS) is a rare leukemic cutaneous T cell lymphoma. This study was conducted to examine the real-world treatment patterns among patients with SS in the USA from 2018 to 2020. METHODS:  This was a retrospective cohort study using the Symphony Health Solutions claims database. Adult patients with ≥ 1 diagnosis code for SS were classified into three non-mutually exclusive cohorts: 2018, 2019, and 2020. Patient characteristics and treatment patterns were examined across the 3 years of study and reported descriptively for each year. Annual treatment patterns were also described for the five states with the highest proportions of SS patients in 2020. RESULTS: Overall, 869, 882, and 853 SS patients were identified in 2018, 2019, and 2020, respectively (median age: 70 years for each year; male: 54.4%, 54.8%, and 55.6%, respectively). The use of any systemic and parenteral systemic treatments increased over time. While utilization rates for many specific systemic therapies decreased over the study period, mogamulizumab use increased, making it the most commonly used systemic treatment in 2020 (29.2%) among patients with any systemic treatment. The five states with the highest proportions of SS patients in 2020 were Florida, New York, California, Texas, and Pennsylvania. Systemic treatment patterns varied considerably by state. CONCLUSION: Some systemic therapies showed decreased usage over time while a few showed increased utilization, with mogamulizumab showing the largest increase. Treatment patterns for SS varied by region. Further research is needed to examine the factors that drive treatment selection for patients with SS.

The Value of Social Media Analysis for Adverse Events Detection and Pharmacovigilance: Scoping Review.

BACKGROUND: Adverse drug events pose an enormous public health burden, leading to hospitalization, disability, and death. Even the adverse events (AEs) categorized as nonserious can severely impact on patient's quality of life, adherence, and persistence. Monitoring medication safety is challenging. Web-based patient reports on social media may be a useful supplementary source of real-world data. Despite the growth of sophisticated techniques for identifying AEs using social media data, a consensus has not been reached as to the value of social media in relation to more traditional data sources. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to evaluate and characterize the utility of social media analysis in adverse drug event detection and pharmacovigilance as compared with other data sources (such as spontaneous reporting systems and the clinical literature). METHODS: In this scoping review, we searched 11 bibliographical databases and Google Scholar, followed by handsearching and forward and backward citation searching. Each record was screened by 2 independent reviewers at both the title and abstract stage and the full-text screening stage. Studies were included if they used any type of social media (such as Twitter or patient forums) to detect AEs associated with any drug medication and compared the results ascertained from social media to any other data source. Study information was collated using a piloted data extraction sheet. Data were extracted on the AEs and drugs searched for and included; the methods used (such as machine learning); social media data source; volume of data analyzed; limitations of the methodology; availability of data and code; comparison data source and comparison methods; results, including the volume of AEs, and how the AEs found compared with other data sources in their seriousness, frequencies, and expectedness or novelty (new vs known knowledge); and conclusions. RESULTS: Of the 6538 unique records screened, 73 publications representing 60 studies with a wide variety of extraction methods met our inclusion criteria. The most common social media platforms used were Twitter and online health forums. The most common comparator data source was spontaneous reporting systems, although other comparisons were also made, such as with scientific literature and product labels. Although similar patterns of AE reporting tended to be identified, the frequencies were lower in social media. Social media data were found to be useful in identifying new or unexpected AEs and in identifying AEs in a timelier manner. CONCLUSIONS: There is a large body of research comparing AEs from social media to other sources. Most studies advocate the use of social media as an adjunct to traditional data sources. Some studies also indicate the value of social media in understanding patient perspectives such as the impact of AEs, which could be better explored. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): RR2-10.2196/47068.

Efficacy and safety of the combination of encorafenib/cetuximab with or without binimetinib in patients with BRAF V600E-mutated metastatic colorectal cancer: an AGEO real-world multicenter study.

BACKGROUND: The combination of encorafenib with cetuximab has become the standard of care in patients with BRAF V600E-mutated metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) after a prior systemic therapy. This study aims to describe the efficacy and safety of encorafenib/cetuximab +/- binimetinib in patients with BRAF V600E-mutated mCRC in a real-world setting. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This retrospective study included patients with BRAF V600E-mutated mCRC who received this combination from January 2020 to June 2022 in 30 centers. RESULTS: A total of 201 patients were included, with 55% of women, a median age of 62 years, and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG-PS) >1 in 20% of cases. The main tumor characteristics were 60% of right-sided primary tumor, 11% of microsatellite instability/mismatch repair deficient phenotype, and liver and peritoneum being the two main metastatic sites (57% and 51%). Encorafenib/cetuximab +/- binimetinib was prescribed in the first, second, third, and beyond third line in 4%, 56%, 29%, and 11%, respectively, of cases, with the encorafenib/cetuximab/binimetinib combination for 21 patients (10%). With encorafenib/cetuximab treatment, 21% of patients experienced grade ≥3 adverse events (AEs), with each type of grade ≥3 AE observed in <5% of patients. The objective response rate was 32.2% and the disease control rate (DCR) was 71.2%. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 4.5 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 3.9-5.4 months] and the median overall survival (OS) was 9.2 months (95% CI 7.8-10.8 months). In multivariable analysis, factors associated with a shorter PFS were synchronous metastases [hazard ratio (HR) 1.66, P = 0.04] and ECOG-PS >1 (HR 1.88, P = 0.007), and those associated with a shorter OS were the same factors (HR 1.71, P = 0.03 and HR 2.36, P < 0.001, respectively) in addition to treatment beyond the second line (HR 1.74, P = 0.003) and high carcinoembryonic antigen level (HR 1.72, P = 0.003). CONCLUSION: This real-world study showed that in patients with BRAF V600E-mutated mCRC treated with encorafenib/cetuximab +/- binimetinib, efficacy and safety data confirm those reported in the BEACON registration trial. The main poor prognostic factors for this treatment are synchronous metastases and ECOG-PS >1.

Effects of integrated traditional Chinese and Western medicine for acute pancreatitis: A real-world study in a tertiary teaching hospital.

AIM: This study aimed to evaluate whether integrated traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) and Western medicine (WM) is more effective than WM for acute pancreatitis (AP). METHODS: Patients with AP were enrolled and divided into the TCM and WM (TCM&WM) and WM groups according to the therapeutic protocol in real clinical settings. We applied 1:3 propensity score matching, which was to adjust confounding factors. The primary outcome was mortality, whereas the secondary outcomes were organ failure, organ supportive therapies, local complications, hospitalization cost, and length of hospital stay. Sensitivity and subgroup analyses were also performed. RESULTS: Of 5442 patients with AP, 4691 and 751 were included in the TCM&WM and WM groups, respectively. After PSM, patient baseline characteristics were well balanced. Compared with the WM group (n = 734), the TCM&WM group (n = 2096) had lower overall mortality rate (1.7% vs. 3.4%; risk ratio, 0.482; 95% confidence interval, 0.286-0.810; p = 0.005). The TCM&WM group was associated with lower risk of persistent renal failure, multiple organ failure, and infection, lower utilization of organ supportive therapies, shortened lengths of hospital and intensive care unit stay, and lower hospital costs. Sensitivity analyses showed similar results. Subgroup analysis favored TCM&WM treatment for patients aged < 60 years, with hypertriglyceridic etiology, and with admission interval between 24 and 48 h. CONCLUSION: TCM&WM treatment can achieve lower risks of mortality and organ failure and better economic effectiveness in patients with AP than WM treatment. This study provides a promising alternative of TCM&WM treatment for AP in the real-world setting.

Real-world treatment outcomes of transcranial pulsating electromagnetic fields as augmentation therapy for treatment-resistant depression.

BACKGROUND: Treatment outcomes of patients who had received T-PEMF as an augmenting therapy at Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark, was evaluated. METHODS: Patients diagnosed with unipolar depression or bipolar disorder who had received a self-administered 8-week T-PEMF series between November 2019 and April 2023 were included. Data were retrieved from the patients' records. The primary outcome was the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression 17-item version (HAMD17), both as a continuous measure and with proportions of response and remission reported. RESULTS: A total of 57 patients (65.1 % females, 86.0 % unipolar depression, mean age, 48 ± 14 years) were included. Duration of current depressive episode was almost equally divided for <2 years (38.6 %), 2-5 years (38.6 %) and > 5 years (22.8 %). HAM-D17 decreased significantly from baseline (20.8 (SD: 3.3)) to week 8 (14.5 (SD: 6.2), p < 0.001). An episode duration of 2-5 years was associated with lower odds of response on HAM-D6 (adjusted OR = 0.15, 95 % CI: 0.03; 0.96, p < 0.05) and self-rated HAM-D6 (adjusted OR = 0.09, 95 % CI: 0.01; 0.99, p = 0.05) when compared to an episode duration <2 years. LIMITATIONS: This study is limited by a lack of a control group, limited controlling of confounders, small sample sizes, and an attrition rate of 29.8 % for the primary outcome. CONCLUSION: T-PEMF reduced depressive symptoms in a real-world clinical setting including patients with both unipolar depression and bipolar disorder. Receiving T-PEMF within the first 2 years of the depressive episode was associated with an improved outcome.

Unveiling the association between fluoroquinolones and aortic diseases using real-world database analysis and pharmacological experiments.

Fluoroquinolones, which are widely used antibiotics, have been linked to aortic disease, which prompted an FDA warning in 2018. Recent reports have challenged the perception that fluoroquinolones pose a significant risk for vascular diseases. This study aimed to investigate whether fluoroquinolones increase the risk of aortic diseases by focusing on the onset of aortic dissection. Levofloxacin (LVFX), a fluoroquinolone, was studied in vitro using cultured vascular cells and in vivo using a mouse model prone to aortic dissection. Risk of adverse drug events was analyzed using VigiBase, a global safety database, and a retrospective cohort analysis was conducted using the JMDC Claims database. LVFX resulted in endothelial cell injury and increased matrix metalloproteinases in vitro. However, in vivo studies showed no significant effect on elastin degradation or aortic dissection incidence. The effect of LVFX on endothelial injury was altered during the onset of dissection, exacerbating injury before onset but inhibiting it afterward. Safety database analysis showed no significant risk signals for aortic dissection associated with fluoroquinolones, which was supported by findings in the receipt database. Inconsistencies were observed in the in vitro and in vivo actions of fluoroquinolones and differences in their effects on aortic dissection and aneurysms. Despite cytotoxicity, the risk of aortic dissection was not significantly increased in clinical scenarios. Based on our findings, concerns regarding aortic diseases do not justify discontinuation of fluoroquinolone use. Further studies are needed to elucidate the conflicting actions of fluoroquinolones, taking into account background pathophysiology such as infection and inflammation.

Post-marketing drug safety surveillance of enfortumab vedotin: an observational pharmacovigilance study based on a real-world database.

Background: Enfortumab vedotin (EV) is an antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) that has been approved by the FDA for patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (UC). This study presents a comprehensive pharmacovigilance analysis of the post-marketing safety profile of EV in the real-world based on the US Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS). Methods: Adverse event (AE) reports regarding EV between January 2020 and December 2023 were obtained from the FAERS database. The standardized MedDRA query (SMQ) narrow search AEs on the preferred term (PT) level were used. Disproportionality analysis was performed to identify the AE signals for EV with the reporting odds ratio (ROR), proportional reporting ratio (PRR), multi-item gamma Poisson shrinker (MGPS), and Bayesian confidence propagation neural network (BCPNN). Results: A total of 2,216 reports regarding EV were included in the present study. SMQ analysis results indicated that a stronger strength signal was found in severe cutaneous adverse reactions, retroperitoneal fibrosis, and peripheral neuropathy. A total of 116 significant disproportionality PTs referring to 14 system organ classes (SOCs) were retained by disproportionality analysis, with 49 PTs not listed on the EV drug label. Frequently reported EV-related AEs included rash, peripheral neuropathy, decreased appetite, alopecia, and pruritus. The time to onset of the majority of EV-related AEs was within 30 days (66.05%), with only 0.73% events occurring after 1 year. Conclusion: The disproportionality analysis highlights that dermatologic toxicity and peripheral neuropathy were the major AEs induced by EV. The potential AEs not listed on the drug label were mainly related to gastrointestinal, hepatic, and pulmonary events. Further research is needed to confirm and explore the EV-related AEs in clinical practice.

Real-world safety and effectiveness of lenvatinib in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma in Korea: post-marketing study.

Aim: This post-marketing surveillance study evaluated the safety and effectiveness of lenvatinib as first-line treatment for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma in Korea.Materials & methods: Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) and other safety and effectiveness end points were assessed in patients who initiated lenvatinib according to the approved label in republic of Korea.Results: Among 658 lenvatinib-treated patients, ADRs were reported in 57.8%; ADRs grade ≥3 in 13.5%. The most common grade ≥3 ADRs were asthenia (1.2%) and hepatic encephalopathy (1.2%). Physician-reported tumor responses (n = 511) were complete (1.0%) or partial (12.9%) response and stable (45.2%) or progressive disease (40.9%); objective response rates were higher with longer lenvatinib treatment duration (p < 0.001).Conclusion: Lenvatinib was generally well tolerated and effective in real-world clinical practice in Korea.Clinical trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05225207.

[Box: see text].

Risk analysis of enfortumab vedotin: A real-world approach based on the FAERS database.

Purpose: To analyze the risk of enfortumab vedotin (EV), a targeted therapy for advanced bladder cancer, using real-world data from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration's Federal Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS). Methods: A retrospective pharmacovigilance analysis was conducted using FAERS data from Q1 2020 to Q1 2024. Adverse drug events (ADEs) related to EV were identified and categorized according to the System Organ Classes (SOCs) and specific events. Statistical methods, such as the proportional reporting ratio, reporting odds ratio (ROR), Bayesian confidence propagation neural network, and empirical Bayesian geometric mean were used to detect safety signals. Results: Of the 7,449,181 FAERS case reports, 1,617 EV-related ADEs were identified, including 101 preferred terms and 22 SOCs. The key SOCs included skin and subcutaneous tissue, metabolic, and nutritional disorders. Rare ADEs, such as lichenoid keratosis (n = 4; ROR 26.89), small intestinal perforation (n = 3; ROR 24.51), pigmentation disorder (n = 9; ROR 18.16), and cholangitis (n = 8; ROR 17.48), showed significant disproportionality. Conclusion: While most findings aligned with the existing data, new signs such as lichenoid keratosis and small intestinal perforation were identified. Further studies are necessary to validate these findings and emphasize the need for the clinical monitoring of EV-related ADEs.

A real-world analysis of adherence, biochemical outcomes, and healthcare costs in patients treated with rosuvastatin/ezetimibe as single-pill combination vs. free combination in Italy.

Aims: To compare medication adherence, lipid goal attainment, and healthcare costs between patients receiving a single-pill combination (SPC) vs. a free combination treatment (FCT) of rosuvastatin/ezetimibe (ROS/EZE) in Italy. Methods and results: Administrative databases of healthcare entities covering ∼7 million individuals were used to identify adults prescribed with ROS/EZE as SPC or FCT between January 2018 and June 2020. Adherence was calculated as the proportion of days covered (PDC) after cohort balancing by propensity score matching. Patients with available LDL cholesterol testing were assessed for the proportion of those who at baseline were above lipid targets recommended by ESC/EAS Guidelines for their cardiovascular risk category and reached the target during follow-up. Among 25 886 patients on SPC and 7309 on FCT, adherent patients were more represented in SPC than FCT cohort (56.8 vs. 44.5%, P < 0.001), and this difference remained significant (P < 0.001) after stratification by cardiovascular risk (very high, high, and other). The proportion of patients reaching LDL cholesterol target at 1 year follow-up was significantly (P < 0.001) higher in SPC vs. FCT cohort: 35.4 vs. 23.8% for very high cardiovascular risk, 46.9 vs. 23.1% for high risk and 71.6 vs. 49.5% for other risk. Total healthcare costs per patient at 1 year follow-up were lower in SPC vs. FCT users (2337€ vs. 1890€, P < 0.001). In both cohorts, costs were mainly driven by drug expenses and hospitalizations. Conclusion: This real-world analysis in dyslipidaemic patients found that treatment with ROS/EZE as SPC resulted in better adherence, higher chances of reaching lipid goals, and cost savings over FCT, in all cardiovascular risk categories.