Bibliometric analysis of renal cell carcinoma with venous tumor thrombus.

Objectives: To identify the cooperation of authors, countries, institutions and explore the hot spots regarding research of renal cell carcinoma with venous tumor thrombus. Methods: Relevant articles were obtained from the Web of Science Core database (WoSC) from 1999 to 2024. CiteSpace was used to perform the analysis and visualization of scientific productivity and emerging trends. Network maps were generated to evaluate the collaborations between different authors, countries, institutions, and keywords. Results: A total of 2180 related articles were identified. We observed an increased enthusiasm in related fields during the past two decades. The USA dominated the field in all countries, and the University of Miami was the core institution. Ciancio G might have a significant influence with more publications and co-citations. Current research hotspots in this field mainly included thrombectomy, tyrosine kinase inhibitors, immune checkpoint inhibitors, vena cava inferior, and microvascular invasion. Thrombectomy complications, thrombectomy survival outcome, and preoperative neoadjuvant immunotherapy represented the frontiers of research in this field, undergoing an explosive phase. Conclusion: This is the first bibliometric study that comprehensively visualize the research trends and status of RCC with VTT. We hope that this work will provide new ideas for advancing the scientific research and clinical application.

Clinical Outcomes for Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma (mRCC) Patients Ineligible for Front-line Clinical Trials.

Clinical trials for immunotherapy-based regimens in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) have extensive inclusion and exclusion criteria. We investigated the clinical outcomes in a real-world cohort of patients who would not have met the criteria for inclusion in front-line mRCC trials. Patients treated with ipilimumab/nivolumab and axitinib/pembrolizumab for front-line mRCC were identified and divided into clinical trial eligible (CTE) and clinical trial ineligible (CTI) cohorts based on key inclusion or exclusion criteria from their respective Phase-3 registration trials. Clinical outcomes were compared in CTE and CTI cohorts. A total of 62 patients treated with axitinib/pembrolizumab and 103 treated with ipilimumab/nivolumab were identified. The International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium (IMDC) criteria were similar across CTE and CTI patients in axitinib/pembrolizumab and ipilimumab/nivolumab cohorts. In the axitinib/pembrolizumab cohort (n = 62), 24 (39%) patients were CTI. The major reasons for the ineligibility were lab abnormalities (n = 11), histology (n = 9), and brain metastases (n = 3). There was no significant difference in response rates (P = 0.08). The median progression-free survival (PFS) was numerically longer in CTE patients (28 vs 12 months; P = 0.09). The overall survival (OS) was higher in the CTE patients (P = 0.02). In the ipilimumab/nivolumab cohort (n = 103), 59 (57%) were CTI. The most common reasons for ineligibility were brain metastases (n = 18), lab abnormalities (n = 16), and histology (n = 16). There was no significant difference in response rates (P = 0.22). However, PFS (P = 0.003) and OS (P < 0.0001) were higher in the CTE patients. In conclusion, many real-world patients are ineligible for RCC clinical trials and had worse outcomes when compared to trial-eligible patients. Additional treatment options are needed for these patients, as well as strategies to include them in prospective trials.

Turning the tide: pembrolizumab's triumph in adjuvant RCC therapy.

In recent years, kidney cancer has shown an increased worldwide incidence of more than 400 000 novel cases annually. Although more than half of patients are diagnosed at a localised stage, this disease presents a high-risk of relapse after surgery. Thus, there is a need for adjuvant therapy post-resection to reduce cancer recurrence and prolong disease-free and overall survival. Thorough investigation of adjuvant drugs for renal cell carcinoma (RCC) has shown little promise in the last fifty years, with no recorded overall survival benefits. This was the case until pembrolizumab, an immune checkpoint inhibitor, was introduced into the adjuvant RCC space through the KEYNOTE-564 trial. The adjuvant administration of this novel anti-PD-1 drug demonstrated a significant overall survival benefit which has led to an update in the current treatment guidelines of RCC. This substantial change in the standard of care also caused an investigation of possible treatment combinations and an adoption of innovative predictive biomarkers. In this review, we will present the evolution of past adjuvant ICI trials for the treatment of RCC, the implications of pembrolizumab's overall survival benefits and a discussion of future directions concerning new RCC drug trials and liquid biopsy-based biomarkers.

Evolving Approach in Nephron-Sparing Surgery: Has Anything Changed from Open Surgery to Laparoscopy?

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to provide valuable insights into the comparative efficacy of different surgical approaches for nephron-sparing surgery (NSS) and contribute to the existing literature in this field. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study included patients who underwent NSS for small renal masses between January 2016 and March 2024. A total of 97 patients (41 in the open approach group, 56 in the laparoscopic approach group) with demographic, radiological, intraoperative, renal functional, and oncological follow-up data were included. Three different anatomical scoring systems (R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score, PADUA score and C-index) were utilised to assess tumour location and estimate proximity to the hilum and collecting system. RESULTS: In the open nephron-sparing surgery (ONSS) and laparoscopic nephron-sparing surgery (LNSS) groups, the mean kidney tumour diameters (SD) were 5.20 ± 2.30 and 4.90 ± 2.10, which were similar in both surgical method groups (p = 0.061). However, tumours treated with ONSS had significantly more adverse morphometric features (p < 0.05). For ONSS and LNSS groups, the mean R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry scores (SD) were 6.15 ± 2.04 and 5.2 ± 1.4 (p = 0.032), respectively; The mean PADUA scores (SD) were 7.46 ± 1.14 and 6.8 ± 1.0 (p = 0.049), respectively; And the mean C-index (SD) scores were 1.39 ± 0.4 and 1.37 ± 0.5 (p = 0.062), respectively. No significant differences were found in the mean tumour diameter (cm) (Inter Quantile Range (IQR)) distribution of both groups (p = 0.058). Despite the slight increase in transfusion rate in the LNSS group, estimated blood loss (EBL), transfusion rates, and length of hospital stay were similar in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Although LNSS does not appear superior in terms of intraoperative blood loss, length of hospital stay and transfusion rate, it provides comparable long-term outcomes to ONSS. Our study suggests that when matched with nephrometry scores, LNSS can achieve similar outcomes to ONSS.

Effects of a Remote Multimodal Psychoeducational Intervention Nursing Program on Mental Health and Quality of Life of Renal Cell Carcinoma Survivors: A Retrospective Study.

BACKGROUND: Undergoing surgery for renal cell carcinoma can potentially compromise the mental well-being and overall quality of life of survivors. Long-term psychological education interventions that are delivered remotely through various modalities have shown promise in enhancing the psychological well-being and quality of life of cancer patients. This study investigates the effect of remote multimodal psychoeducational interventions on mental well-being and quality of life of renal cell carcinoma survivors. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted to compare patients receiving remote psychological interventions (exposure group) with those receiving standard care (control group). Following the interventions, various data sets including general demographic information, and assessments from the Hamilton anxiety scale (HAMA), Hamilton depression scale (HAMD), the Brief Fatigue Inventory-Chinese version (BFI-C), the Distress Thermometer (DT), and the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) were gathered and analysed for comparison. RESULTS: This study included 116 renal cell carcinoma survivors, with 52 in the exposure group and 64 in the control group. Baseline characteristics were not significantly different between the two groups (p > 0.05). After the intervention, the exposure group had significantly lower scores than the control group on HAMA (14.63 vs. 16.66, p < 0.001), HAMD (13.63 vs. 16.36, p < 0.001), BFI-C (52.31 vs. 57.65, p < 0.001), and DT (3.94 vs. 4.98, p < 0.001). Additionally, the exposure group had significantly higher total score of EORTC QLQ-C30 (69.22 vs. 65.59, p < 0.001) than the control group. CONCLUSIONS: Remote multimodal psychoeducational interventions demonstrate a notable impact in mitigating adverse emotions, exhaustion, and discomfort experienced by survivors of renal cell carcinoma. Such interventions should be actively promoted in clinical practice.

Comprehensive analysis of LD-related genes signature for predicting prognosis and immunotherapy response in clear cell renal cell carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Lipid droplets (LD) in renal clear cell carcinoma (ccRCC)play a crucial role in lipid metabolism and immune response modulation. The purpose of this study was to create a LD-related signature to predict prognosis and guide the immunotherapy and targeted therapy in ccRCC patients. METHODS: We conducted a comprehensive analysis using transcriptional profiles and clinical data obtained from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). LD-related genes were identified from existing literature and the GeneCards database, and differentially expressed genes were determined. Sequentially, we conducted Cox regression analysis and Lasso regression analysis, to establish a prognostic risk model. The performance of the risk model was evaluated using Kaplan-Meier (KM) analysis and time-dependent receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Additionally, gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA), ESTIMATE, CIBERSORT, and immunophenoscore (IPS) algorithm were used to assess the tumor microenvironment (TME) and treatment response. RESULTS: We constructed a risk signature with four LD-related genes in the TCGA dataset, which could be an independent prognostic factor in ccRCC patients. Then, patients were classified into two risk groups and exhibited notable differences in overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and TME characteristics. Furthermore, we developed a comprehensive nomogram based on clinical features, which demonstrated good prognostic predictive value. According to the results of GSEA analysis, immune-related pathways were found to be significantly enriched in the high-risk group. Additionally, the high-risk group displayed high levels of immune cell infiltration, TMB and IPS scores, indicating better efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Finally, high-risk demonstrated reduced IC50 values compared to the low-risk counterpart for specific targeted and chemotherapeutic drugs, suggesting that the patients receiving these targeted drugs in high-risk group had better treatment outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggested that the LD-related gene signature could potentially predict the prognosis of ccRCC patients. Additionally, it showed promise for predicting responses to immunotherapy and targeted therapy in ccRCC patients. These insights might potentially have guided the clinical management of these patients, but further validation and broader data analysis are needed to confirm these preliminary observations.

Histopathologic classification and immunohistochemical features of papillary renal neoplasm with potential therapeutic targets.

Background: Papillary renal cell carcinoma (pRCC) is the second most common histological subtype of renal cell carcinoma and is considered a morphologically and molecularly heterogeneous tumor. Accurate classification and assessment of the immunohistochemical features of possible therapeutic targets are needed for precise patient care. We aimed to evaluate immunohistochemical features and possible therapeutic targets of papillary renal neoplasms. Methods: We collected 140 papillary renal neoplasms from three different hospitals and conducted immunohistochemical studies on tissue microarray slides. We performed succinate dehydrogenase B, fumarate hydratase, and transcription factor E3 immunohistochemical studies for differential diagnosis and re-classified five cases (3.6%) of papillary renal neoplasms. In addition, we conducted c-MET, p16, c-Myc, Ki-67, p53, and stimulator of interferon genes (STING) immunohistochemical studies to evaluate their pathogenesis and value for therapeutic targets. Results: We found that c-MET expression was more common in pRCC (classic) (p = .021) among papillary renal neoplasms and Ki-67 proliferation index was higher in pRCC (not otherwise specified, NOS) compared to that of pRCC (classic) and papillary neoplasm with reverse polarity (marginal significance, p = .080). Small subsets of cases with p16 block positivity (4.5%) (pRCC [NOS] only) and c-Myc expression (7.1%) (pRCC [classic] only) were found. Also, there were some cases showing STING expression and those cases were associated with increased Ki-67 proliferation index (marginal significance, p = .063). Conclusions: Our findings suggested that there are subsets of pRCC with c-MET, p16, c-MYC, and STING expression and those cases could be potential candidates for targeted therapy.

Comparison of the efficacy of sunitinib and pazopanib in patients with advanced non-clear renal cell carcinoma.

Non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma (non-ccRCC) is a highly heterogeneous disease group, accounting for approximately 25% of all RCC cases. Due to its rarity and especially heterogeneity, phase III trial data is limited and treatment options generally follow those of clear cell RCC. In the literature, there exists a number of studies with sunitinib, cabozantinib, and everolimus, but data on the efficacy of pazopanib are limited. Our aim in this study was to compare the efficacy of pazopanib and sunitinib, in a multicenter retrospective cohort of non-ccRCC patients. Our study included patients diagnosed with non-ccRCC who received pazopanib or sunitinib treatment as first-line therapy from 22 tertiary hospitals. We compared the progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and response rates of pazopanib and sunitinib treatments. Additionally, we investigated prognostic factors in non-ccRCC. PFS and response rates of sunitinib and pazopanib were found to be similar, while a numerical difference was observed in OS. Being 65 years and older, being in the intermediate or poor risk group according to the International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium, having liver metastases, presence of a sarcomatoid component, and having de novo metastatic disease were found to be significantly associated with shorter PFS. Pazopanib treatment appears to have similar efficacy in the treatment of non-ccRCC compared to sunitinib. Though randomized controlled trials are lacking and will probably be never be available, we suggest that pazopanib could be a preferred agent like sunitinib and cabozantinib.

Pazopanib and sunitinib treatments show similar progression free survival, overall survival and objective response rate.IMDC risk group, liver metastasis, sarcomatoid component and de novo metastatic disease were determined as prognostic factors.

Paraneoplastic Syndrome Prevalence and Survival in Racially-Diverse Cohort With Renal Cell Carcinoma.

INTRODUCTION: The prevalence of preoperative paraneoplastic syndromes (PNS) in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is poorly understood. Many laboratory abnormalities representative of PNS have demonstrated prognostic value when incorporated into predictive survival models in RCC. We sought to characterize the relationship between baseline prevalence of PNS with overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) in RCC patients following nephrectomy. METHODS: Our prospectively maintained nephrectomy database was retrospectively reviewed for any stage, major histology RCC patients that underwent surgery from 2000 to 2022. Baseline laboratory values within 90 days (closest used) were required. Presence of PNS was defined according to established laboratory cutoffs. Kaplan-Meier curves estimated survival rates, and multivariable Cox proportional hazards models examined the association between PNS with OS and CSS following nephrectomy. RESULTS: 2599 patients were included with listed staging: 1494 Stage I; 180 Stage II; 616 Stage III; 306 Stage IV. Proportion of patients presenting with >1 PNS significantly increased from stage I (31.3%) to stage IV (74.2%) RCC (P < .001). Elevated C-reactive protein was the most prevalent PNS (45.4%). On multivariable analysis, the presence of >1 PNS was associated with higher risk of all-cause (HR 2.09; P < .001) and cancer-specific mortality (HR 2.55; P < .001). The 10-year OS estimates as reported: 65.2% (no PNS), 52.3% (1 PNS), 36.6% (>1 PNS); and 10-year CSS estimates: 88.3% (no PNS), 79.3% (1 PNS), 61.6% (>1 PNS). DISCUSSION: Increased prevalence of PNS in major histology RCC was associated with a significant increase in the risk of all-cause and cancer-specific mortality even when accounting for patient and disease characteristics.

Clinical features and response to immune combinations in patients with renal cell carcinoma and sarcomatoid de-differentiation (ARON-1 study).

Metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) carrying sarcomatoid features (sRCC) has aggressive biology and poor prognosis. First-line immunotherapy (IO)-based combinations have improved the outcome of clear cell RCC patients, including that of sRCC. Real-world data confirming the adequate first-line management of sRCC is largely lacking. We investigated the clinical features and the outcome of sRCC patients treated with IO-based combinations within the ARON-1 study population (NCT05287464). The primary objective was to define the incidence and baseline clinical characteristics of sRCC compared with non-sRCC patients. The secondary objective was to describe the outcome of sRCC patients based on type of first-line treatment (IO + IO vs. IO + tyrosin kinase inhibitor [TKI]). We identified 1362 mRCC patients with IMDC intermediate or poor risk, 226 sRCC and 1136 non-sRCC. These two subgroups did not differ in terms of baseline characteristics. The median overall survival (OS) was 26.8 months (95%CI 21.6-44.2) in sRCC and 35.3 months (95%CI 30.2-40.4) in non-sRCC patients (p = .013). The median progression-free survival (PFS) was longer in non-sRCC patients compared to sRCC (14.5 vs. 12.3 months, p = .064). In patients treated with first-line IO + TKI the median OS was 34.4 months compared to 26.4 months of those who received IO + IO (p = .729). The median PFS was 12.4 months with IO + TKI and 12.3 months with IO + IO (p = .606). In conclusion, we confirm that sRCC are aggressive tumors with poor prognosis. IO-based combinations improve survival outcomes of sRCC patients, regardless from the type of strategy (IO + IO versus IO + TKI) adopted.

Comparing open and robot-assisted partial nephrectomy - a single institution report.

BACKGROUND: Open partial nephrectomy (OPN) has previously been considered the gold standard procedure for treatment of T1 localized renal tumors. After introduction of robot assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) as an alternative method to OPN, OPN was gradually abandoned at our department. The aim of the study was to retrospectively compare the results of patients treated with either OPN or RAPN for suspected renal carcinoma. METHODS: Patients who underwent either open or robotic assisted partial nephrectomy between January 1st 2010 and December 31st 2020 were retrospectively included in the study. Each tumor subjected to surgery was scored preoperatively by the RENAL nephrometry score. Complications within 30 days were assessed according to the Clavien-Dindo classification system. RESULTS: A total of 197 patients who underwent partial nephrectomy were identified; 75 were subjected to OPN and 122 were treated with RAPN. There were no significant differences between the groups with respect to age (OPN: 63 years ± 11, RAPN: 62 years ± 10), gender (OPN: 71/29%, RAPN: 67/33%), body mass index (OPN: 28 ± 5, RAPN: 28 ± 5), ASA score (OPN: 2.4 ± 0.6, RAPN: 2.2 ± 0.5), or nephrometry score (OPN: 6.6 ± 1.7, RAPN: 6.9 ± 1.7, p = 0.2). The operative time was significantly shorter in the OPN group (81 min) compared to the RAPN group (144.5 min, p < 0.001). Mean perioperative blood loss was 227 ± 162 ml in the OPN group compared to 189 ± 152 ml in the RAPN group (p = 0.1). Mean length of stay was shorter in the RAPN group (3 days) compared to the OPN group (6, days, p < 0.001). Positive surgical margin rate was significantly higher in the OPN group (21.6%) compared to the RAPN group (4.2%, p < 0.001). There were no differences in the number of Clavien-Dindo graded complications between the groups (p = 0.6). CONCLUSIONS: The introduction of RAPN at our department resulted in shorter length of stay and fewer positive surgical margins, without increasing complications.

Identification of PI3K-AKT Pathway-Related Genes and Construction of Prognostic Prediction Model for ccRCC.

BACKGROUND: Clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC), the predominate histological type of renal cell carcinoma (RCC), has been extensively studied, with poor prognosis as the stage increases. Research findings consistently indicated that the PI3K-Akt pathway is commonly dysregulated across various cancer types, including ccRCC. Targeting the PI3K-Akt pathway held promise as a potential therapeutic approach for treating ccRCC. Development and validation of PI3K-Akt pathway-related genes related biomarkers can enhance healthcare management of patients with ccRCC. PURPOSE: This study aimed to identify the key genes in the PI3K-Akt pathway associated with the diagnosis and prognosis of CCRCC using data mining from the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and Gene Expression Synthesis (GEO) datasets. METHODS: The purpose of this study is to use bioinformatics methods to screen data sets and clinicopathological characteristics associated with ccRCC patients. The exhibited significantly differential expressed genes (DEGs) associated with the PI3K-Akt pathway were examined by KEGG. In addition, Kaplan-Meier (KM) analysis used to estimate the survival function of the differential genes by using the UALCAN database and graphPad Prism 9.0. And exploring the association between the expression levels of the selected genes and the survival status and time of patients with ccRCC based on SPSS22.0. Finally, a multigene prognostic model was constructed to assess the prognostic risk of ccRCC patients. RESULTS: A total of 911 genes with common highly expressed were selected based on the GEO and TCGA databases. According to the KEGG pathway analysis, there were 42 genes enriched in PI3K-Akt signalling pathway. And seven of highly expressed genes were linked to a poor prognosis in ccRCC. And a multigene prognostic model was established based on IL2RG, EFNA3, and MTCP1 synergistic expression might be utilized to predict the survival of ccRCC patients. CONCLUSIONS: Three PI3K-Akt pathway-related genes may be helpful to identify the prognosis and molecular characteristics of ccRCC patients and to improve therapeutic regimens, and these risk characteristics might be further applied in the clinic.

Tubulocystic renal cell carcinoma: A case report of rare tumor.

Tubulocystic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is a rare renal cancer first recognized by the WHO in 2016 as independent disease category, characterized by its typically indolent features and low rates of metastasis. We present a 35-year-old male with tubulocystic RCC diagnosed incidentally on evaluation of flank pain. Magnetic resonance imaging showed Bosniak class 4 renal cyst, although initial computed topography showed a hypodense nonenhancing lesion classified as Bosniak 1 cyst. Patient underwent robotic assisted partial nephrectomy, histopathology confirmed as tubulocystic RCC. This case highlights the importance of considering tubulocystic RCC in the differential diagnoses of renal cysts and other solid renal masses to ensure timely and effective treatment plan.

Surgical Management of Renal Cell Carcinoma: Comparisons of open and laparoscopic approaches.

Objectives: Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is a leading urological malignancy with an age-standardised incidence rate of 2.5 per 100,000 per year in Oman. Experts are inclined towards the early detection and use of minimally invasive technology for the treatment of RCC. This study aimed report the shifting trend in the clinical presentation and management of RCC in Oman, comparing the outcomes of laparoscopic and open nephrectomy. Methods: This retrospective study included adult RCC patients from Sultan Qaboos University Hospital, Muscat, Oman, diagnosed from 2011-2022. Patient biodata, mode of presentation, diagnostic modality, final histopathology and details of treatment received including the perioperative outcomes were analysed. Results: A total of 56 patients that underwent surgical treatment for RCC, 34 underwent laparoscopic nephrectomy (LN) and 22 underwent open nephrectomy (ON). The mean ages in the LN and ON groups were 53.82 ± 13.44 years and 56.22 ± 15.00 years (P = 0.53), respectively. There were 47 patients of Omani descent and 9 patients were expatiates. The patients' mean tumour size was 6.25 ± 3.16 cm and 9.23 ± 5.20 cm for the LN and ON groups, respectively; 55.35% of the RCC cases were incidentally diagnosed. A trend towards LN was observed. Conclusion: This study found a trend towards early diagnosis of RCC in Oman, with the majority of cancers being discovered incidentally in the studied period. LN is more commonly used in the surgical management of RCC with acceptable morbidity. These trends remain aligned with those found in the global literature on RCC.

Lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab for untreated advanced renal cell carcinoma: a systematic review and cost-effectiveness analysis.

Background: Renal cell carcinoma is the most common type of kidney cancer, comprising approximately 85% of all renal malignancies. Patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma are the focus of this National Institute for Health and Care Excellence multiple technology appraisal. A patient's risk of disease progression depends on a number of prognostic risk factors; patients are categorised as having intermediate/poor risk or favourable risk of disease progression. Objectives: The objectives of this multiple technology appraisal were to appraise the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab versus relevant comparators listed in the final scope issued by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence: sunitinib, pazopanib, tivozanib, cabozantinib and nivolumab plus ipilimumab. Methods: The assessment group carried out clinical and economic systematic reviews and assessed the clinical and cost-effectiveness evidence submitted by Eisai, Hatfield, Hertfordshire, UK (the manufacturer of lenvatinib) and Merck Sharp & Dohme, Whitehouse Station, NJ, USA (the manufacturer of pembrolizumab). The assessment group carried out fixed-effects network meta-analyses using a Bayesian framework to generate evidence for clinical effectiveness. As convergence issues occurred due to sparse data, random-effects network meta-analysis results were unusable. The assessment group did not develop a de novo economic model, but instead modified the partitioned survival model provided by Merck Sharp & Dohme. Results: The assessment group clinical systematic review identified one relevant randomised controlled trial (CLEAR trial). The CLEAR trial is a good-quality, phase III, multicentre, open-label trial that provided evidence for the efficacy and safety of lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab compared with sunitinib. The assessment group progression-free survival network meta-analysis results for all three risk groups should not be used to infer any statistically significant difference (or lack of statistically significant difference) for any of the treatment comparisons owing to within-trial proportional hazards violations or uncertainty regarding the validity of the proportional hazards assumption. The assessment group overall survival network meta-analysis results for the intermediate-/poor-risk subgroup suggested that there was a numerical, but not statistically significant, improvement in the overall survival for patients treated with lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab compared with patients treated with cabozantinib or nivolumab plus ipilimumab. Because of within-trial proportional hazards violations or uncertainty regarding the validity of the proportional hazards assumption, the assessment group overall survival network meta-analysis results for the favourable-risk subgroup and the all-risk population should not be used to infer any statistically significant difference (or lack of statistically significant difference) for any of the treatment comparisons. Only one cost-effectiveness study was included in the assessment group review of cost-effectiveness evidence. The study was limited to the all-risk population, undertaken from the perspective of the US healthcare system and included comparators that are not recommended by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence for patients with untreated advanced renal cell carcinoma. Therefore, the extent to which resource use and results are generalisable to the NHS is unclear. The assessment group cost-effectiveness results from the modified partitioned survival model focused on the intermediate-/poor-risk and favourable-risk subgroups. The assessment group cost-effectiveness results, generated using list prices for all drugs, showed that, for all comparisons in the favourable-risk subgroup, treatment with lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab costs more and generated fewer benefits than all other treatments available to NHS patients. For the intermediate-/poor-risk subgroup, treatment with lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab costs more and generated more benefits than treatment with cabozantinib and nivolumab plus ipilimumab. Conclusions: Good-quality clinical effectiveness evidence for the comparison of lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab with sunitinib is available from the CLEAR trial. For most of the assessment group Bayesian hazard ratio network meta-analysis comparisons, it is difficult to reach conclusions due to within-trial proportional hazards violations or uncertainty regarding the validity of the proportional hazards assumption. However, the data (clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness) used to populate the economic model are relevant to NHS clinical practice and can be used to inform National Institute for Health and Care Excellence decision-making. The assessment group cost-effectiveness results, generated using list prices for all drugs, show that lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab is less cost-effective than all other treatment options. Study registration: This study is registered as PROSPERO CRD4202128587. Funding: This award was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Evidence Synthesis Programme (NIHR award ref: NIHR134985) and is published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 28, No. 49. See the NIHR Funding and Awards website for further award information.

Renal cell carcinoma is the most common type of kidney cancer. Several drug treatment options are available for NHS patients with advanced or metastatic disease, and the choice of treatment varies depending on a patient's risk of disease progression. A new drug combination, lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab, may soon become available to treat NHS patients. This review explored whether treatment with lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab offered value for money to the NHS. We reviewed the effectiveness of treatment with lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab versus other NHS treatment options. We also estimated the costs and benefits of treatment with lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab versus current NHS treatments for patients with higher and lower risks of disease progression. Compared with current NHS treatments, treatment with lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab may increase the time that people with a higher risk of disease progression (i.e. worsening disease) were alive. However, for patients with a lower risk of disease progression, the available evidence is limited and only shows that treatment with lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab may prolong the time that patients have a stable level of disease. For all patients, compared to all current NHS treatments, treatment with lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab is very expensive. Compared with current NHS treatments for untreated renal cell carcinoma, using published prices (which do not include any discounts that are offered to the NHS), treatment with lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab may not provide good value for money to the NHS.

Abscopal effect following checkpoint inhibitor therapy and localized radiotherapy for metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma: A case report.

We present the case of a 64-year-old patient with metastatic renal cell carcinoma, who experienced disease progression despite undergoing multiple lines of systemic therapy, including immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI). Two months after stereotactic radiosurgery to his brain lesions and while the patient was not on any systemic therapy, restaging scans demonstrated a dramatic near complete regression of the primary renal lesion and metastatic sites, which was attributed to the abscopal effect, mediated by the exposure to ICI and radiotherapy. While its mechanisms are not fully understood, it is believed to stem from the tumor immunosuppression and immunogenicity induced by radiation.

Comparison of renal function between the artery and vein clamp and artery-only clamp in robot-assisted partial nephrectomy for moderate- to high-complexity renal masses: A propensity-matched study.

OBJECTIVE: Artery and vein (AV) clamps can control venous bleeding in the surgical field and prevent carbon dioxide embolism, especially when large veins are expected to open. However, whether AV clamps cause more renal damage than artery-only (AO) clamps remains unclear. This study aimed to compare renal function and blood loss in surgeries using AO and AV clamps based on high RENAL nephrometry scores (RNS) in robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN). METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the medical records of 500 patients who underwent RAPN between March 2016 and December 2021. We performed 1:1 propensity matching for these patients. RESULTS: A total of 340 patients with pathological malignancies who were followed up for at least 12 months were included in this analysis. A total of 291 patients with AO clamping and 49 patients with AV clamping were included. Overall, the AV clamp group had higher total RNSs and larger diameters than the AO clamp group. Propensity score-matched analysis included 37 patients in each clamp group. The median warm ischemia times of the AV and AO clamps were 25 and 22 min, respectively, with no significant difference. There were no statistically significant differences between the groups in the amount of blood loss, rate of acute kidney injury (AKI), or renal function at 1, 3, or 12 months post-RAPN. CONCLUSION: Compared with the AO clamp, the AV clamp did not have a detrimental impact on blood loss or renal dysfunction. Consequently, AV clamps may be considered for patients presenting with moderate-to-high-complexity RNSs.

Focal therapy for oligometastatic and oligoprogressive renal cell carcinoma: a narrative review.

Metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) can present with oligometastatic disease and/or develop oligoprogression following systemic therapy. Cytoreductive and focal metastasis-directed therapy options include resection, stereotactic ablative radiation and thermal ablation. Aggressive focal therapy may allow delay in initiation of or modification to systemic therapy and improve clinical outcomes. In this narrative review we synthesize current practice guidelines and prospective data on focal therapy management options and highlight future research. Patient selection and the choice of focal treatment techniques are controversial due to limited and heterogeneous data and patients may benefit from multidisciplinary evaluation. Prospective comparative trials with clearly defined inclusion criteria and relevant end points are needed to clarify the risks and benefits of different approaches.

[Box: see text].

Quadratus lumborum block for procedural and postprocedural analgesia in renal cell carcinoma percutaneous cryoablation.

This study assesses the efficacy of the quadratus lumborum block (QLB) in the management of procedural and periprocedural pain associated with small renal mass cryoablation. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study that examines the use of QLB for pain management during percutaneous cryoablation of renal cell carcinoma (RCC). A single-center retrospective review was conducted for patients who underwent cryoablation for RCC with QLB between October 2020 and October 2021. The primary study endpoint included a total dose of procedural conscious sedation and administered, postprocedural analgesia. Technical success in cryoablation was achieved in every case. No patients required additional analgesic during or after the procedure, and no complications resulted from the use of the QLB. The QLB procedure appears to be an effective locoregional block for the management of procedural and periprocedural pain associated with renal mass cryoablation.