On the spillover effect and optimal size of marine reserves for sustainable fishing yields.

Marine reserves are an essential component of modern fishery management. Marine reserves, which represent a management tradeoff between harvesting and conservation, are fundamental to maintenance of fisheries. Finding optimal reserve sizes that improve fishing yields is not only of theoretical interest, but also of practical importance to facilitate decision making. Also, since the migratory behavior of some species influences the spillover effect of a marine reserve, this is a key consideration when assessing performance of marine reserves. The relationship between optimal reserve size and migration rate/mode has not been well studied, but it is fundamental to management success. Here, I investigate optimal reserve size and its management outcome with different levels of spillover via a simple two-patch mathematical model. In this model, one patch is open to fishing, and the other is closed. The two-patch model is aggregated by single-population dynamics when the migration rate is sufficiently larger than the growth rate of a target species. At this limit, I show that an optimal reserve size exists when pre-reserve fishing occurs at fishing mortality larger than f MSY, the fishing mortality at the maximum sustainable yield (MSY). Also, the fishing yield at an optimal reserve size becomes as large as MSY at the limit. Numerical simulations at various migration rates between the two patches suggest that the maximum harvest under management with a marine reserve is achieved at this limit. This contrasts with the conservation benefit which is maximized at an intermediate migration rate. Numerical simulations show that the above-mentioned condition for an optimal reserve size to exist derived from the aggregated model is necessary when the migration rate is not sufficiently large, and that a moderate migration rate is further necessary for an optimal reserve size to exist. However, high fishing mortality reduces this requirement.

Conservation value of small reserves.

The importance of large reserves has been long maintained in the scientific literature, often leading to dismissal of the conservation potential of small reserves. However, over half the global protected-area inventory is composed of protected areas that are <100 ha, and the median size of added protected area is decreasing. Studies of the conservation value of small reserves and fragments of natural area are relatively uncommon in the literature. We reviewed SCOPUS and WOK for studies on small reserve and fragment contributions to biodiversity conservation and ecosystem services, and fifty-eight taxon-specific studies were included in the review. Small reserves harbored substantial portions (upward of 50%) of regional species diversity for many taxa (birds, plants, amphibians, and small mammals) and even some endemic, specialist bird species. Unfortunately, small reserves and fragments almost always harbored more generalist and exotic species than large reserves. Community composition depended on habitat quality, surrounding land use (agricultural vs. urban), and reserve and fragment size, which presents opportunities for management and improvement. Small reserves also provided ecosystem services, such as pollination and biological pest control, and cultural services, such as recreation and improved human health. Limitations associated with small reserves, such as extinction debt and support of area-sensitive species, necessitate a complement of larger reserves. However, we argue that small reserves can make viable and significant contributions to conservation goals directly as habitat and indirectly by increasing landscape connectivity and quality to the benefit of large reserves. To effectively conserve biodiversity for future generations in landscapes fragmented by human development, small reserves and fragments must be included in conservation planning.

Valor de Conservación de las Pequeñas Reservas Resumen La importancia de las reservas muy extensas se ha mantenido durante mucho tiempo dentro de la literatura científica, lo que comúnmente lleva a la desestimación del potencial de conservación de las reservas pequeñas. Sin embargo, más de la mitad del inventario mundial de áreas protegidas está compuesto por zonas resguardadas con un tamaño menor a las 100 ha, y el tamaño promedio de área protegida añadida está disminuyendo. Los estudios sobre el valor de conservación de las reservas pequeñas y los fragmentos de área natural son relativamente poco comunes en la literatura. Revisamos estudios sobre las contribuciones de las reservas pequeñas y los fragmentos a la conservación de la biodiversidad y los servicios ambientales en SCOPUS y en WOK. Se incluyeron 58 estudios específicos de taxón en la revisión. Las reservas pequeñas albergaron porciones sustanciales (más del 50%) de diversidad de especies regionales para muchos taxones e incluso algunas especies de aves endémicas y especialistas. Desafortunadamente, las reservas pequeñas y los fragmentos casi siempre albergaron más especies exóticas y generalistas que las reservas grandes. La composición de la comunidad dependió de la calidad del hábitat, el uso de suelo (urbano versus agrícola) adyacente y el tamaño de la reserva o el fragmento, lo que presenta oportunidades de manejo y mejora. Las reservas pequeñas también proporcionaron servicios ambientales, como la polinización y el control biológico de plagas, y servicios culturales, como la recreación y una mejor salud humana. Las limitaciones asociadas con las reservas pequeñas, como la deuda de extinción y el respaldo a especies sensibles al área, requieren de un complemento de reservas más grandes. Sin embargo, argumentamos que las reservas pequeñas pueden tener contribuciones viables y significativas para las metas de conservación directamente como hábitat e indirectamente con el incremento de la conectividad y la calidad de paisajes para el beneficio de las reservas más grandes. Para conservar efectivamente a la biodiversidad para generaciones futuras en paisajes fragmentados por el desarrollo humano, se debe incluir a las reservas pequeñas y a los fragmentos en la planeación de la conservación.

Larger Area Facilitates Richness-Function Effects in Experimental Microcosms.

Species-area relationships (SAR) and biodiversity-ecosystem function (BEF) relationships are central patterns in community ecology. Although research on both patterns often invokes mechanisms of community assembly, both SARs and BEFs are generally treated as separate phenomena. Here we link the two by creating an experimental SAR in microcosm communities and show that greater species richness in larger areas is accompanied by greater ecosystem function. We then explore mechanisms of community assembly by determining whether rare, large, or high-biomass species are more likely to persist in the larger microcosms. Our results indicate that larger areas harbor more rare species of a wider range of body sizes and have higher functional diversity, implying that the addition of niche space that supports rare species underlies the effect of area on species richness and function. Our results suggest that the preservation of large areas is a potentially useful way of maximizing the provisioning of ecosystem services through the maintenance of biodiversity.