The perceived long-term impact of peer teaching in the skills lab. A descriptive interview study.

Teaching is an essential skill for future doctors. Peer-assisted learning (PAL)-where students take up a teaching role at an early stage of their training-is widely used in medical curricula. No studies have explored the long-term perceived impact of peer teaching. Therefore, we aimed to determine how former peer teachers reflected on PAL and its perceived long-term impact. In this longitudinal descriptive study, we conducted 42 semi-structured interviews with 11 former peer teachers at the University of Antwerp. Five of them were interviewed 6 months after PAL; 6 of them 9 years after PAL. This latter group was also interviewed during PAL in a previous study. We conducted secondary analyses of previously collected interviews, consistently comparing the findings with new data gathered from the current interviews. Using realist thematic analysis, topic summary themes were generated. Former peer teachers reflected on their PAL experience with a lot of satisfaction. Those meanwhile working as residents are still passionate about teaching. Peer teachers experienced a gain in clinical examination- and professional skills in the long-term, facilitating a smoother transition to their internship. Our findings suggest that PAL selects diverse but committed students. The longitudinal data demonstrate how PAL initiates or stimulates different skills in diverse students, including public speaking, teaching, time management, and self-efficacy in specific clinical skills. Regarding the chicken-and-egg question, our study encompasses both longitudinal cases illustrating the pre-existing skill theory and cases demonstrating how achieved competences were induced by PAL. Former peer teachers experienced long-term benefits of PAL, which eased their transition into the internship. PAL has the potential to ignite a lasting passion for teaching, providing diverse and unique learning opportunities not only for the most talented and 'pre-selected' medical students but also for a range of dedicated future clinicians.

Facilitating the transition to residency: A resident-as-coach pilot program.

BACKGROUND: The transition from medical school to residency is a critical developmental phase; coaching may help students prepare for this role transition. AIMS: We explored whether near-peer coaching could improve a specific workplace skill prior to residency. METHODS: A resident-as-coach program was piloted for the medicine sub-internship, an advanced acting internship rotation. Between March and June 2021, 26 students were assigned a resident coach (n = 16). Resident coaches completed one training session, and student-coach dyads met for one coaching session on 'pre-rounding'- gathering patient data before rounds. The program was evaluated through surveys and focus groups. RESULTS: 20/26 students and 14/16 residents completed the survey. 19/20 students identified a pre-rounding challenge and reported increased pre-rounding efficiency; all committed to one actionable step for improvement. All 16 residents felt their coaching skills improved. In focus groups, students valued the program's focus on honing a relevant skill in a safe, near-peer setting. Residents expressed their intent to incorporate coaching into their future work. CONCLUSIONS: A resident-as-coach model can be effective in preparing students for residency, while concurrently building residents' coaching skills.

An Online Resident-as-Teacher Curriculum Improves First-Year Residents' Self-Confidence Teaching in the Clinical Learning Environment.

We implemented an online Resident-as-Teacher curriculum for all incoming residents (PGY1s) to provide them with a basic foundation for effective teaching in the clinical learning environment. The curriculum consisted of 5 asynchronous modules delivered via the web from 2017-2021. Prior to starting the course, the PGY1s completed a self-assessment of their teaching ability (pre-test) and then again 7-8 months after completing the course (post-test). Analysis of the paired data from 421 PGY1s showed a statistically significant improvement in the self-ratings of their teaching from pre-test to post-test (p < 0.001). Our findings suggest that an online Resident-as-Teacher curriculum can produce lasting benefits in new residents' self-confidence as educators.

Resident-teaching of ethics in undergraduate medical education: a grounded theory analysis.

Background: In graduate medical education, teaching is a required subcompetency largely fulfilled via clinical teaching, journal clubs, and grand rounds. Evidence shows that when moving to undergraduate teaching, residents often face a steep learning curve. We aimed to assess residents' perspective of the experience of teaching medical students. Methods: Psychiatry residents taught small group sections of bioethics to first- and second-year medical students in December 2018. We conducted two 1-hour focus group interviews with four residents on their perspectives on the teaching experience. Results: Resident-teachers described receiving certain benefits from teaching, such as meeting their altruistic desire to give back to the profession. Nonetheless, some participants felt frustrated by students' varying engagement and respect, while also feeling insecure and intimidated. Resident-teachers experienced some of the medical students as disrespectful and limited in their appreciation for diversity and the profession of medicine and perceived the students' disengagement and lessened professionalism. Conclusion: As residency programs seek to implement initiatives to improve teaching skills of residents, resident experiences should be considered when implementing these initiatives.

Dermatology residents as educators: a qualitative study of identity formation.

BACKGROUND: One of the many identities a physician comes to form during their career is their identity as an educator. Exploring formation of this identity may enrich our understanding of how physicians make decisions related to their roles as educators, their behaviors, and how this ultimately influences the educational environment. It is the aim of this study to investigate educator identity formation of dermatology residents while early in their careers. METHODS: Drawing on a social constructionist paradigm, we conducted a qualitative study, utilizing an interpretative approach. We examined longitudinal data over a 12-month period using dermatology residents' written reflections from their professional portfolios and semi-structured interviews. We collected this data as we progressed through and beyond a 4-month professional development program designed to encourage residents' growth as educators. Sixty residents in their second, third, or final year of residency programs located in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia were invited to take part in this study. Twenty residents participated with sixty written reflections and 20 semi-structured interviews. Qualitative data were analyzed using a thematic analysis approach. RESULTS: Sixty written reflections and 20 semi-structured interviews were analyzed. Data was categorized according to themes corresponding to the original research questions. For the first research question regarding identity formation, themes included definitions of education, the process of education, and identity development. For the second research question, 1 theme entitled professional development program included, the following sub-themes: individual act, interpersonal activity, and an organizational undertaking, with many believing that residency programs should prepare residents for their educator roles. Participants also described newfound leadership ambitions of creating new dermatology fellowship programs as a result of taking part in the Resident-as-Educator program. CONCLUSIONS: Our study provides insights on the dynamic formation of educator identities amongst dermatology residents. Investment in developing residents as educators through professional development programs may instigate transformational change on the individual physician level and profession's level.

The Big Sibling program: Impact of a medical student-resident mentorship program during the surgery clerkship.

BACKGROUND: We created a Big Sibling mentorship program for medical students and studied the program effects. METHODS: Between July 2019 to December 2020, students completing their surgery clerkship were paired with a Big Sibling surgical research resident. Participation in and perceptions of the program were assessed by survey. RESULTS: 81 medical students and 25 residents participated with a 79% and 95% survey response rate, respectively. The most valuable topics discussed included ward skills, personal development and career advising. Students who interacted >2 times with their Big Sibling were more likely to perceive the operating room as a positive learning environment, view attendings as role models, and receive mentoring and feedback from residents and attendings (p = 0.03, 0.02, 0.01 respectively). 78% of residents thought the program was a positive experience and no residents found it burdensome. CONCLUSION: The Big Siblings program enhances the surgery clerkship learning environment. Students who engaged with their Big Sibling had a more positive view of the clerkship and the mentorship provided by residents and attendings.

Who Wants to Learn How to Teach? Perceptions of Radiology Residents and Radiology Teaching Faculty Regarding Resident as Teacher Training.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: While the ACGME requires Resident as Teacher (RAT) training, curricula in radiology remain limited. Our study was performed to examine radiology residents (RR) and teaching faculty (TF) perceptions about RAT training. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In 2021, anonymous online surveys were administered to all RR (53-item) and to all TF (24-item) of a radiology residency program. Content domains included attitudes about RAT training and learning topics. RESULTS: Response rates were 97% (38/39) for RR and 54% (58/107) for TF. Most RR desired training to become better educators to medical students (MS) (81%) and other residents (83%). Seventy-seven percent of RR reported the importance regarding how to give feedback to other learners, while 94% desired formal training on delivering case presentations. While 94% of RR reported that resident feedback was valuable, only 6% reported always giving feedback to MS. Seventy-two percent of RR did not apply at least some best-practices in their reading room teaching. Fifty-nine percent of RR wanted TF to observe their own teaching skills and provide feedback although 70% reported rarely or never receiving TF feedback. Ninety-three percent of TF reported RR should receive RAT training, while 88% reported that feedback of RR to MS was important. CONCLUSION: RR and TF strongly endorsed the need for RAT training. RR anticipate teaching to be an important part of their careers. We identified learning topics and possible gaps regarding how TF are meeting RR needs, which could inform the development of RAT curricula.

Exploring Resident Motivation with a Podcast Creation Activity: A Qualitative Study.

Purpose: As the field of digital education expands, it is important to understand the benefit to the creator of such resources as well as the user. This study sought to understand the resident's experience with writing a medical podcast script in contrast to creating lecture-based teaching presentations. We aimed to explore the motivation behind the resident's voluntary participation and provide an example and framework to residency programs looking to enhance their resident as teacher curricula with the use of digital education. Materials and Methods: Using constructivist grounded theory, residents who completed a podcast script for "The Intern at Work," a learner-generated podcast series, were recruited to partake. Focus groups were recorded, transcribed, and coded iteratively with the use of constant comparison until theoretical sufficiency was achieved. Results: Residents (n = 12) described three key factors of the podcast development activity that fostered learner motivation: (1) Driving Interest: residents were excited to use a novel outlet to teach; (2) Self-Directed Process: residents appreciated the opportunity for collaboration and flexibility; (3) Appreciable Benefit: residents identified several self-gains. Conclusion: Our findings provide an example of an innovative teaching activity that intrinsically motivated residents. Such information has the potential to inform program leaders on how to foster resident motivation to teach.

Near-peers effectively teach clinical documentation skills to early medical students.

BACKGROUND: Composing the History of Present Illness (HPI), a key component of medical communication, requires critical thinking. Small group learning strategies have demonstrated superior effectiveness at developing critical thinking skills. Finding sufficient faculty facilitators for small groups remains a major gap in implementing these sessions. We hypothesized that "near-peer" teachers could effectively teach HPI documentation skills and fill the gap of small group facilitators. Here, we present a head-to-head comparison of near-peer and faculty teaching outcomes. METHODS: Second-year medical students in a single institution participated in an HPI Workshop as a clinical skills course requirement. Students were randomly assigned a near-peer or faculty facilitator for the workshop. We compared mean facilitator evaluation scores and performance assessments of students assigned to either type of facilitator. RESULTS: Three hundred sixty-five students, 29 residents (near-peers) and 16 faculty participated. On post-session evaluations (5-point Likert scale), students ranked near-peer facilitators higher than faculty facilitators on encouraging participation and achieving the goals of the session (residents 4.9, faculty 4.8), demonstrating small, statistically significant differences between groups. Mean scores on written assessments after the workshop did not differ between the groups (29.3/30 for a written H&P and 9/10 for an HPI exam question). CONCLUSIONS: Near-peer facilitators were as effective as faculty facilitators for the HPI Workshop. Utilizing near-peers to teach HPI documentation skills provided teaching experiences for residents and increased the pool of available facilitators.

Resources for clinical learning environment orientation.

INTRODUCTION: Each clinical learning environment (CLE) requires learners to navigate a different set of complex interactions to engage in safe patient care while learning from real patients. Orientation forms the foundation for learning, yet CLE models in the literature are primarily written for an educator audience and practical advice for orienting learners to a new CLE is limited. To address this gap, we designed resources to support both supervisors and learners in the orientation process. MATERIALS/METHODS: We reviewed the CLE literature to select critical content for orientation and interviewed high performing residents to identify their best practices. We synthesized the literature and resident interviews into a visually appealing and easy to digest infographic designed to simultaneously remind teachers of the critical areas to cover in orientation and empower learners to ask about them. We integrated these principles into an online module for Graduate Medical Education onboarding and surveyed users about how well they could meet the module learning objectives. RESULTS: We organized the literature review and resident advice regarding questions learners should ask about a new CLE into the typical question categories (why, who, what, when, where, and how) and described strategies for orientation to each category. Our infographic has been incorporated into CLE orientation for multiple types of learners at our institution. After completing the orientation module, 112/124(90%) residents indicated that they could, 'Orient yourself or a learner to a clinical learning environment using orientation questions' moderately to extremely well. DISCUSSION: We developed resources that can be used by educators to create orientation materials and by learners to ensure they understand important features, resources, and expectations in a new CLE. Because the foundational principles of CLE apply to a variety of clinical settings and learner types, the resources may be broadly applicable.

Formation and Evaluation of an Academic Elective for Residents in a Combined Internal Medicine-Pediatrics Residency Program.

Background Recently, there has been increasing focus on skills that are crucial for success in residency that is not explicitly taught. Specifically, the four domains of teaching skills, evidence appraisal, wellness, and education on structural racism have been identified as topics that are important and underrepresented in current resident education curriculums, largely due to time constraints. Methods A task force consisting of one post-graduate year 2 (PGY-2) resident, one PGY-4 resident, the Associate Program Director, and the Program Director of the Internal Medicine-Pediatrics residency program was formed to explore current deficiencies in resident curriculum and to research possible solutions. As an intervention, we created and executed a four-week academic elective with dedicated time for upper-level residents to learn and explore the four domains of resident teaching, evidence-based clinical practice, wellness, and anti-racism work. The elective included several clinical sessions dedicated to implementing the skills taught in the elective. The month-long elective completed in January 2021. All residents evaluated each lecture or experience based on how valuable it was to their education on a Likert scale from 1 to 7, with 1 defined as "not valuable at all" and 7 defined as "extremely valuable." Results Residents rated the overall value of teaching in each domain highly. Education and activities in wellness lectures were found to have the highest value-added material (6.20 ± 0.41, n = 18), followed by residents-as-teachers lectures (5.93 ± 0.25, n = 48), anti-racism (5.57 ± 1.11, n = 9), and evidence-based clinical practice (5.18 ± 0.50, n = 43). In addition, each domain was found to have at least one high-yield topic. Conclusions We were able to create and execute an academic elective with dedicated time for upper-level residents to develop and utilize valuable skills in teaching, evidence appraisal, wellness, and anti-racism. Future work will focus on refining the curriculum based on resident evaluations and expanding this elective to the Internal Medicine and Pediatrics categorical programs at our institution.

Creating Clinician Educators: Evaluation of a One-Month Medical Education Curriculum for Senior Residents.

BACKGROUND: Clinician-educator tracks improve teaching behaviors in trainees. However, detailed curriculum descriptions to fully understand, compare, and reproduce them are often lacking. We aimed to describe and evaluate a medical education curriculum for senior residents. METHODS: Based on Kolb's experiential learning model, we designed a one-month curriculum to increase teaching effectiveness. PGY 2-4 internal medicine and medicine-pediatrics residents in a university-based training program participated in the course from 2015-2019. In a pre-post design, participants completed a survey to evaluate the curriculum. Survey items related to four constructs in medical education: knowledge, confidence, skills, and importance (5-point Likert scale; 1=low, 5=high). We assessed the difference in the means for each construct before and after the curriculum. RESULTS: Thirty-nine residents completed the curriculum (19% of total residents), and 100% of participants completed the surveys. We observed an increase in the mean self-rated level of teaching knowledge (2.63 [SD 0.57] vs. 4.43 [SD 0.42], p<0.005), confidence (3.31 [SD 0.4] vs. 4.29 [SD 0.32], p<0.005), and skills (2.9 [SD 0.63] vs. 4.14 [SD 0.38], p<0.005) after completing the course. Residents consistently graded individual curricular components highly. CONCLUSIONS: We describe a one-month medical education curriculum with a strong foundation in learning theory. The curriculum is feasible and presented in sufficient detail to allow reproduction. Our findings suggest that it increases participants' self-perceptions of teaching knowledge, confidence, and skills.

Teaching Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity in Pediatric Clinical Settings: A Training Workshop for Faculty and Residents.

Introduction: Health disparities for the lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, intersex, asexual, all other genders, sexes, and sexualities (LGBTQIA+) population are striking. Yet, deliberate efforts to integrate sexual orientation and gender identity in pediatric education settings remain lacking. The type of formal training that pediatric educators currently have for teaching of sexual orientation and gender identity is unclear and limited, which led to the development and implementation of this curriculum. Methods: A 2-hour workshop was developed to address gaps in knowledge, equip faculty and resident educators with skills to apply key concepts in teaching activities, and motivate them to examine challenges and opportunities in teaching sexual orientation and gender identity principles in their routine duties in pediatric settings across the undergraduate and graduate education spectrum. Learning strategies of the workshop included learner activation, a didactic, and clinical cases with role-play opportunities. Participants completed evaluations at the end of the workshop. Results: The workshop was implemented in three varied educational settings in 2019. All 65 participants enrolled in the workshop completed the evaluations. Evaluations ranged from 4.6 to 4.9 on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = strongly disagree, 5 = strongly agree). Participants reported workshop strengths and anticipated impact on their own teaching and clinical practice. Discussion: Stark health disparities for the LGBTQIA+ population and gaps in relevant curricula demand a training intervention for pediatric educators. We demonstrated the successful implementation of a training workshop, with evidence of feasibility and generalizability, that addressed knowledge gaps and teaching and clinical skills.

Piloting a first-year resident-as-teacher workshop to foster evidence-based teaching.

PURPOSE: Residents function as important educators of dental students; however, they often have limited training in educational best-practices. Resident-as-teacher programs have been designed and implemented in other health professions to prepare residents to teach in clinic and classroom settings. In this research, we describe the design, implementation, and evaluation of a 2-day workshop for first-year advanced dental residents. METHODS: The program engaged residents in techniques to: (1) foster psychological safety, (2) use the cognitive apprenticeship framework, (3) deliver quality feedback, and (4) conduct effective didactic instruction. Nineteen first-year residents attended 2 four-hour workshops in July 2019. The impact of the program was evaluated using Kirkpatrick's model, which included participant reactions, learning, and self-reported behaviors. RESULTS: Most residents (at least 83.3%) reported the value and quality of the workshop was high or very high. With regard to knowledge, residents had statistically significant higher scores after the workshop on knowledge questions about cognitive apprenticeship (P < 0.01), feedback strategies (P < 0.05), and classroom instruction techniques (P < 0.05). Resident reported self-efficacy had a statistically significantly increase (P < 0.05) after the workshop in psychological safety, cognitive apprenticeship, and most items related to providing feedback; there were few changes in self-efficacy on classroom instruction strategies. CONCLUSION: Overall, a workshop to prepare residents as teachers can improve knowledge and self-efficacy in evidence-based educational practices.

Measuring teacher identity during the transition from medical school to residency.

Residents undergo professional identity formation during training, and the integration of a teacher identity into that of a clinician is part of this process. We aimed to measure the teacher identity of incoming interns of various specialties. In this cross-sectional, survey-based study, we modified a validated teacher identity scale and distributed it to residents attending orientation at a large, academic institution. A total of 297 residents took the survey, including 272 interns; 80% (218/272) of interns completed the survey and permitted use of their data. The mean score for global teacher identity was 4.16 (SD 0.67) on a 1 to 5 Likert scale. There were significant differences between interns' current self-assessed teaching abilities and their desired future performance as teachers (P < 0.001 for all domains). Male interns had higher global teacher identity scores (4.27) than female interns (4.05; P = 0.02). There were no differences in global teacher identity between interns in medical, surgical, and supportive specialties. Interns who had participated in a student-as-teacher program in medical school had higher global teacher identity (P < 0.001) than those who had not. In conclusion, teacher identity is high in incoming interns, with higher scores in men and in those who completed student-as-teacher programs in medical school.

A Resident-as-Teacher Curriculum for Senior Residents Leading Morning Report: A Learner-Centered Approach Through Targeted Faculty Mentoring.

Introduction: Senior resident-led morning report (MR) occurs in many residency programs, but residents rarely receive training on how to facilitate MR or feedback on their facilitation. I created and implemented a required 2-week resident-as-teacher curriculum pairing senior residents with faculty mentors. Methods: The curriculum allowed individualization to each specific resident's needs. The faculty mentor helped the resident set curricular goals, observed and provided feedback on resident facilitation of four MRs and one noontime conference, and reviewed adult learning principles with the resident. The curriculum guided the faculty and resident pair through leading MR and applied evidence to guide resident teaching. I surveyed resident teachers, the residents who attend MR, and faculty mentors to determine the curriculum's perceived educational impact. Results: Over the 2010-2016 academic years, 124 senior residents participated. Senior residents self-reported significantly more confidence, interest, and preparedness for teaching after the curriculum. Trainees attending MR rated the quality of equal value after curriculum implementation, and responded that senior residents leading MR were more likely to give clear explanations, teach at an appropriate level, and were less likely to run out of time. Faculty mentors enjoyed participating and found the one-on-one mentorship relationship important for their satisfaction with the experience. Discussion: Outcome data suggested that the mentorship relationship was the most important element of the curriculum and that flexibility was key to allowing individual needs to be met. The intervention is applicable to other residency programs and specialties, and faculty mentors are not required to have a medical education background.

The Development of an Instrument for Faculty to Assess Resident-Led Large Group Teaching.

OBJECTIVE: The Accreditation Council on Graduate Medical Education requires residents to teach and many residency programs assess resident teaching competency. While much formal resident-led teaching is for large groups, no corresponding published assessment instrument with validity evidence exists. We developed an instrument for faculty to assess pediatric resident-led large group teaching and gathered preliminary validity evidence. METHODS: Literature review and our experience leading resident-as-teacher curricula informed initial instrument content. Resident focus groups from 3 northeastern pediatric residency programs provided stakeholder input. A modified Delphi panel of international experts provided iterative feedback. Three investigators piloted the instrument in 2018; each assessed 8 video recordings of resident-led teaching. We calculated Cronbach's alpha for internal consistency and intraclass correlation (ICC) for inter-rater reliability. RESULTS: The instrument has 6 elements: learning climate, goals/objectives, content, promotion of understanding/retention, session management, and closure. Each element contains behavioral subelements. Cronbach's alpha was .844. ICC was excellent for 6 subelements, good for 1, fair for 1, and poor for 3. CONCLUSIONS: We developed an instrument for faculty assessment of resident-led large group teaching. Pilot data showed assessed behaviors had good internal consistency, but inconsistent interrater reliability. With further development, this instrument has potential to assess resident teaching competency.

Focused Teaching Improves Medical Student Professionalism and Data Gathering Skills in the Emergency Department.

INTRODUCTION:  Leaders in medical education have developed milestones and core competencies in an attempt to ensure that relational skills, such as communication and professionalism, are emphasized in addition to the usual skills of medical knowledge, data gathering, and emergency stabilization during students' emergency medicine (EM) medical education. Providers facile in each of these areas have better patient outcomes, patient experiences, and decreased incidence of malpractice cases. The authors attempted to demonstrate that by deliberate teaching of these skills during an EM medical student clerkship, students could significantly improve their clinical performance. METHODS:  This prospective, randomized, single-blinded cohort study was performed at an academic, tertiary, urban ED to investigate the effects of a one-on-one preceptor shift on the clinical performance of fourth-year medical students. Students were randomized into two groups and assessed by pre- and post-intervention objective structured clinical encounters (OSCEs) with standardized patients (SPs) at weeks one and three. A crossover design was employed so that students in the control group participated in a preceptor shift after their second OSCE. Measurements were based on a five-point Likert scale assessment linked to early EM milestones as defined by the Accreditation Council on Graduate Medical Education (ACGME).  Results: The mean improvement in total overall score was significantly greater in the intervention group: 4.31 versus 2.57 (Cohen's d = 0.57, p = 0.029). When each milestone was assessed individually, students in the intervention group improved significantly in data gathering (Cohen's d = 0.47, p = 0.048) and professionalism (Cohen's d = 0.66, p = 0.011). There was a nonstatistically significant improvement for the intervention compared to control group in emergency management and communication skills. There was no improvement for either group in medical knowledge. CONCLUSION:  A one-on-one preceptor shift can result in a statistically significant improvement in data gathering and professionalism skills as measured by OSCEs.

Performance of Pediatrics' residents as clinical teachers: A student-based assessment.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the clinical teaching skills of Pediatrics' residents as rated by final year MBBS students by using augmented Stanford Faculty Development Program questionnaire (SFDPQ) in a teaching hospital, Lahore. METHODS: This cross- sectional survey was conducted in the Department of Pediatrics, King Edward Medical University, Lahore in six months in 2016.Total of 265 students of final year MBBS, attending the teaching sessions organized by residents during their four weeks rotation in Pediatrics were included by non-probability purposive sampling. The augmented SFDPQ was emailed to the study participants after the completion of the clinical rotation, following several encounters with the resident. The data was entered in SPSS 22 for statistical analysis. Scores for each domain (learning climate, control of session, communication of goals, promoting understanding and retention, evaluation, promoting self-directed learning, teacher's knowledge and teacher's attitude) were also presented as mean and standard deviation. One-sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov test was applied to observe the normality of data. Where normality of data was observed, independent sample t-test was applied and where normality of data was not observed, Mann-Whitney U test was applied to compare the score between genders. Score of four was considered as cut off score for satisfactory results. RESULTS: Out of 265 students, 250 responded with response rate of 94.3%. Out of 250 medical students, 105 (42.0%) were male and 145(58.0%) were female. The internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha) of this score was excellent (0.973). The mean score for all SFDPQ domains was also sub-optimal (2.90±0.611). The mean total score was sub-optimal for learning climate (3.39±0.69), control of session (3.25±0.77), communication of goals (3.26±0.86), promoting understanding and retention (3.26±0.77), evaluation (2.25±0.67), promoting self-directed learning (3.17±0.90), teacher's knowledge (3.14±0.93) and teacher's attitude (3.31±0.89), while it was good only for feedback (4.03±0.11). The mean total score for all SFDPQ domains in males and females was 3.05±0.54 and 2.79±0.64 respectively. Although sub-optimal in both the genders, the score was significantly higher in males with p-value 0.001. CONCLUSION: We found suboptimal clinical teaching skills of Pediatrics' residents as rated by final year MBBS medical students.

Resident-as-Teacher Programs in General Surgery Residency: Context and Characterization.

OBJECTIVE: Teaching medical students and junior residents are key components of a surgical resident's role. How surgical residents are formally prepared for their teaching role is not well described. The aim of this study was to characterize the status of formal Resident-as-Teacher Programs (RATPs) in U.S. general surgery residency programs. We also sought to understand current attitudes towards teaching by residents. DESIGN: A survey regarding the presence of RATPs and attitudes toward teaching by residents was sent through the Association of Program Directors in Surgery (APDS) to general surgery program directors (PDs). SETTING: The study was conducted using an electronically distributed survey. PARTICIPANTS: Program directors of general surgery residencies were contacted through the APDS. RESULTS: Program directors from 105 institutions completed the survey; one did not respond to the question about RATPs. 27 (26%) indicated they utilized a RATP. Of these programs the majority, 25 (93%), were developed at the institution and only 2 (6%) used a published curriculum. For the programs without a RATP, 47 (61%) of PDs indicated they were interested in establishing one. Respondents not interested most often cited other resident obligations and time constraints as limiting factors. CONCLUSIONS: Fewer than one third of responding programs have an established RATP; of those programs that do not have a RATP, the majority are interested in establishing one. Residents clearly play an important role teaching and PDs acknowledge teaching is an important part of residents' daily job, thus formal preparing residents for their teaching role is important. Development and dissemination of a RATP that can be easily incorporated in to general surgery programs would meet an identified need in general surgery training.