Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Emergency General Surgery Outcomes Among Older Adult Patients.

INTRODUCTION: Racial and ethnic disparities in emergency general surgery (EGS) patients have been well described in the literature. Nonetheless, the burden of these disparities, specifically within the more vulnerable older adult population, is relatively unknown. This study aims to investigate racial and ethnic disparities in clinical outcomes among older adult patients undergoing EGS. METHODS: This retrospective analysis used data from 2013 to 2019 American College of Surgeons National Surgery Quality Improvement Program database. EGS patients aged 65 y or older were included. Patients were categorized based on their self-reported race and ethnicity. The primary outcomes evaluated were in-hospital mortality, 30-d mortality, and overall morbidity. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to examine the relationship between race/ethnicity and postoperative outcomes while adjusting for relevant factors including age, comorbidities, functional status, preoperative conditions, and surgical procedure. RESULTS: A total of 54,132 patients were included, of whom 79.8% identified as non-Hispanic White, 9.5% as non-Hispanic Black (NHB), 5.8% as Hispanic, and 4.2% as non-Hispanic Asian. After risk adjustment, compared to non-Hispanic White patients, NHB, non-Hispanic Asian, and Hispanic patients had decreased odds of 30-d mortality. For 30-d readmission and reoperation, differences among groups were comparable. However, NHB patients had significantly increased odds of overall morbidity (adjusted odds ratio, 1.18; 95% confidence interval: 1.10-1.26; P < 0.001) and postoperative complications including sepsis, venous thromboembolism, and unplanned intubation. Hispanic ethnicity was associated with lower odds of postoperative myocardial infarction and stroke. CONCLUSIONS: Among older adult patients undergoing emergency general surgery, minority patients experienced higher morbidity rates, but paradoxical disparities in mortality were detected. Further research is necessary to identify the cause of these disparities and develop targeted interventions to eliminate them.

Approach to radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer after the LACC trial and associated complications: a NSQIP study.

BACKGROUND: The Laparoscopic Approach to Cervical Cancer (LACC) study results revolutionized our understanding of the best surgical management for this disease. Following its publication, guidelines state that the standard and recommended approach for radical hysterectomy is with an open abdominal approach. Nevertheless, the impact of the LACC trial on real-world changes in the surgical approach to radical hysterectomy remains elusive. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to study the trends and routes of radical hysterectomies and to evaluate post-operative complication rates before and after the LACC trial (2018). STUDY DESIGN: The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program registry was used to examine radical hysterectomies performed for cervical cancer between 2012-2022. We excluded vaginal radical hysterectomies and simple hysterectomies. The primary outcome measures were the trends in route of surgery [minimally invasive surgery (MIS) vs. laparotomy] and surgical complications rate, stratified by periods before and after the publication of the LACC trial in 2018 (2012-2017 vs. 2019-2022). The secondary outcome measure was major complications associated specifically with the different routes of surgery. RESULTS: Of the 3,611 patients included, 2,080 (57.6%) underwent laparotomy and 1,531 (42.4%) underwent MIS radical hysterectomy. There was a significant increase in the MIS approach from 2012 to 2017 (45.6% MIS in 2012 to 75.3% MIS in 2017, p<.001), and a significant decrease in MIS from 2018 to 2022 (50.4% MIS in 2018 to 11.4% MIS in 2022, p<.001). The rate of minor complications was lower in the period before the LACC trial [317 (16.9%) vs. 288 (21.3%), p=.002]. Major complications rate was similar before and after the LACC trial [139 (7.4%) vs. 78 (5.8%), p=.26]. The rates of blood transfusions and superficial surgical site infections were lower in the period before the LACC trial [137 (7.3%) vs. 133 (9.8%), p=.012 and 20 (1.1%) vs. 53 (3.9%), p<.001, respectively]. In a comparison of MIS vs. laparotomy radical hysterectomy during the entire study period, patients in the MIS group had lower rates of minor complications [190 (12.4%) vs. 472 (22.7%), p<.001] and the rate of major complications was similar in both groups [100 (6.5%) in the MIS group vs. 139 (6.7%) in the laparotomy group, p=.89]. In a specific complications analysis, the rates of blood transfusion and superficial surgical site infections were lower in the MIS groups (2.4% vs. 12.7%, and 0.6% vs. 3.4%, p<.001 for both comparisons) and the rate of deep incisional surgical site infections was lower in the MIS group (0.2% vs. 0.7%, p=.048). In a multiple logistic regression analysis, the route of radical hysterectomy was not independently associated with occurrence of major complications [aOR 95% CI 1.02 (0.63-1.65)]. CONCLUSION: While the proportion of MIS radical hysterectomy decreased abruptly following the LACC trial, there was no change in the rate of major post-operative complications. In addition, hysterectomy route was not associated with major post-operative complications.

A cross sectional survey on burnout and career satisfaction in surgeons: a joint work from the SAGES quality, outcomes, and safety and reimaging the practice of surgery burnout task forces.

INTRODUCTION: The growth of surgeon burnout is of significant concern. As we work to reimagine the practice of surgery, an accurate understanding of the extent of surgeon burnout is essential. Our goal was to define the current prevalence of burnout and quality of life (QOL) among SAGES surgeons. METHODOLOGY: An electronic survey was administered to SAGES members to establish a current baseline for QOL, burnout, depression, and career satisfaction. To assess outcomes, we utilized the validated Maslach Burnout Inventory for Medical Personnel, the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form, and the Primary Care Evaluation of Mental Disorders. All scoring followed validated norm-based methods. RESULTS: Of 4194 active members, 604 responded (14.40%). 69% met burnout threshold, with high levels of emotional exhaustion and depersonalization, and low personal accomplishment. 81% reported "being at the end of their rope", 74% felt emotionally drained, and 65% felt used up daily. Nearly all maintained caring about what happened to their patients (96%), easily understanding how their patients feel (84.3%) and being capable of dealing effectively with their patient's problems (87.6%). However, respondents never, rarely, or occasionally felt energetic (77.5%) or experienced a sense of professional accomplishment (57.8%). The overall QOL score was 69/100, with lower Mental than Physical scores (62.69 (SD 10.20) vs.77.27 (SD 22.24)). More than half of respondents met depression criteria. While 77% supported they would become a physician again, less than half would choose surgery again or recommend surgery to their children. Furthermore, less than a third felt work allowed sufficient time for their personal lives. CONCLUSIONS: Participating SAGES surgeons reported alarmingly high rates of burnout and depression. Despite experiencing emotional exhaustion and depersonalization, they maintained a strong commitment to patient care. These findings likely reflect the broader state of surgeons, underscoring the urgent need for action to address this critical issue.

Baseline Frailty Measured by the Risk Analysis Index and 30-Day Mortality After Surgery for Spinal Malignancy: Analysis of a Prospective Registry (2011-2020).

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the prognostic utility of baseline frailty, measured by the Risk Analysis Index (RAI), for prediction of postoperative mortality among patients with spinal malignancy (SM) undergoing resection. METHODS: SM surgery cases were queried from the American College of Surgeons - National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database (2011-2020). The relationship between preoperative RAI frailty score and increasing rate of primary endpoint (mortality or discharge to hospice within 30 days, "mortality/hospice") were assessed. Discriminatory accuracy was assessed by computation of C-statistics (with 95% confidence interval [CI]) in receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. RESULTS: A total of 2,235 cases were stratified by RAI score: 0-20, 22.7%; 21-30, 11.9%; 31-40, 54.7%; and ≥ 41, 10.7%. The rate of mortality/hospice was 6.5%, which increased linearly with increasing RAI score (p < 0.001). RAI was also associated with increasing rates of major complication, extended length of stay, and nonhome discharge (all p < 0.05). The RAI demonstrated acceptable discriminatory accuracy for prediction of primary endpoint (C-statistic, 0.717; 95% CI, 0.697-0.735). In pairwise ROC comparison, RAI demonstrated superiority versus modified frailty index-5 and chronological age (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Preoperative frailty, as measured by RAI, is a robust predictor of mortality/ hospice after SM surgery. The frailty score may be applied in clinical settings using a user-friendly calculator, deployed here: https://nsgyfrailtyoutcomeslab.shinyapps.io/spinalMalignancyRAI/.

Feeble, fallen, and forgetting: association of cognitive impairment and falls on outcomes of major intra-abdominal surgeries in older adults.

BACKGROUND: Both cognitive impairment/dementia (CID) and falls occur more commonly in older adults than in younger patients. This study aimed to analyze the association of a history of CID or falls with the postoperative outcomes of older adults undergoing major intra-abdominal surgeries on a national level. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the American College of Surgeons-National Surgical Quality Improvement Program 2022 Participant Use Data File. Our primary outcome was postoperative mortality. Statistical analysis was performed using the Chi-square test and multivariate regression analysis. RESULTS: On multivariable regression analyses, a history of both CID (odds ratio [OR] = 1.9; CI: 1.5-2.5; P < .01) and a fall (OR = 1.8; CI: 1.4-2.3; P < .01) were independently associated with higher adjusted odds of mortality. History of CID or falls was also a predictor of overall complications, major complications, and discharge to a care facility. CONCLUSION: A history of CID or falls in older adults before major intra-abdominal surgeries was associated with a high risk of postoperative mortality and morbidity. Further studies are required to establish the causal relation of these factors and the steps to mitigate the risk of associated adverse outcomes.

NSQIP data collection up to 30 postoperative days is sufficient to capture some complications in orthopedic surgeries.

PURPOSE: The primary aim of this study is to determine if the 30-day follow-up period used by the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSIQP) is an appropriate timeframe to capture complications after orthopedic surgeries. METHODS: The 2019 NSQIP data were used. The independent variables were complication type. The dependent variable was days to complication. A Shapiro-Wilk test was used to determine if the data were normally distributed. RESULTS: 271,397 orthopedic cases were included. Myocardial infarction, pneumonia, ventilator over 48 h, progressive renal insufficiency, acute renal failure, stroke, and cardiac arrest had positive skewness and positive kurtosis. Deep incisional surgical site infection (SSI), organ/space SSI, wound disruption, unplanned reoperation one, unplanned reoperation two, readmission two, and readmission three had negative kurtosis and negative skewness. Complications with positive kurtosis and positive skewness are more likely to be confined to the 30-day postoperative period, whereas complications with negative skewness and negative kurtosis may be underreported within the 30-day follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: These findings are useful in their ability to inform future orthopedic research using NSQIP which continues to generate new data for surgeons to consider for their postoperative care and complication management.

Tracking Residents' Surgical Outcomes Using Data from the Quality In-Training Initiative.

OBJECTIVES: Monitoring resident trainees' patient outcomes is essential to improving surgical performance; however, resident-specific follow-up is rarely provided in the current surgical training environment. Whether there is a correlation between individual resident's surgical performance and patients' clinical outcomes remains undefined. In this study, we aimed to use risk-adjusted patient outcomes as an educational tool to track individual surgical trainee performance. STUDY DESIGN: American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP) appendectomy and partial colectomy operations (2013-2021) were examined. Residents performing ≥25 operations were included. The primary outcome was ACS NSQIP-defined morbidity adjusted using estimated probability of morbidity. Observed-to-expected ratios (O/E) of morbidity measured overall performance and risk-adjusted cumulative sum (RA-CUSUM) methodology represented surgical resident's performance over time. SETTING: Academic quaternary care institution. PARTICIPANTS: Highest-ranking surgical resident participating in an operation and included in Quality In-Training Initiative. RESULTS: A total of 449 operations were examined. 12 residents performed 343 appendectomy operations. 7 residents (29.3 ± 5.1 operations each) did not have any postoperative morbidity and demonstrated better-than-expected patient outcomes. Three residents did not have morbidity after their seventh/eleventh/fifteenth appendectomies. Two residents (case volume 29, 33) had an O/E ratio > 3. Partial colectomy (n = 106) performed by 4 residents had 2 residents (case volume 30, 26) with better-than-expected outcomes and 2 with worse-than-expected (case volume 25, 25). CONCLUSION: Longitudinal monitoring of postoperative patient outcomes provides an opportunity for trainee self-reflection and system examination. RA-CUSUM methodology offers sequential monitoring allowing for early evaluation and intervention when RA-CUSUM results for a trainee demonstrate higher-than-expected morbidity.

Quality assessment of surgery for colorectal cancer: Where do we stand?

Quality assurance in surgery has been one of the most important topics of debate among colorectal surgeons in the past decade. It has produced new surgical standards that led in part to the impressive oncological outcomes we see in many units today. Total mesorectal excision, complete mesocolic excision (CME), and the Japanese D3 lymphadenectomy are now benchmark techniques embraced by many surgeons and widely recommended by surgical societies. However, there are still ongoing discrepancies in outcomes largely based on surgeon performance. This is one of the main reasons why many countries have shifted colorectal cancer surgery only to high volume centers. Defining markers of surgical quality is thus a perquisite to ensure that standards and oncological outcomes are met at an institutional level. With the evolution of CME surgery, various quality markers have been described, mostly based on measurements on the surgical specimen and lymph node yield, while others have proposed radiological markers (i.e. arterial stumps) measured on postoperative scans as part of the routine cancer follow-up. There is no ideal marker; however, taken together and assembled into a new score or set of criteria may become a future point of reference for reporting outcomes of colorectal cancer surgery in research studies and defining subspecialization requirements both at an individual and hospital level.

Cost, Operative Delay, and X-Rays for Incorrect Surgical Counts.

At Cleveland clinic, an incorrect surgical count triggers Code Rust; a protocol that mandates an intraoperative patient X-ray, staff radiology read, and discussion with the surgeon before the incision is closed. Code Rust calls from November 2014 to December 2022 were retrospectively reviewed. Realtime workflow and operative details of Code Rust cases were analyzed.1277 Code Rusts were identified. Average time from ordering the X-ray to final radiology report was 50 minutes, totalling $2,362,450.00 spent on operating room time. Code Rust was called twice as frequently during urgent or emergent cases, compared to elective. There were more staff in Code Rust rooms compared to non-Code Rust rooms. A foreign body on X-ray was identified in 42/1277 (3.3%) cases. Code Rust is a resource intensive process that is more common in emergent cases that involve multiple staff. While retained foreign bodies are identified in a small percentage of cases, the current system should be revisited to reduce operating time and expense.

The Aging Surgeon: Considerations for Navigating a Successful and Satisfying Career.

Our careers as surgeons are some of the busiest and perhaps most sought after in existence. We have all put in countless years of tenacious effort, at times blood, frequent sweat, and occasional tears, to have the privilege to care for others and correct their ailments. Many of us are like freight trains rolling down the tracks indefinitely. But all too often we finish our training and head down those tracks without considering what stops we should make along the way, which forks in the tracks we should consider taking, and perhaps most often, we do not consider how we are going to eventually stop the train. Most of us have been witness to colleagues who keep working beyond their prime, be it for lack of alternative opportunities, lack of hobbies to retire to, or for lack of insight into their own decline. From these observations was born this presidential panel. As you can see, it is a collection of past presidents of So Cal ACS, with the exception for Dr Freischlag (who we all know would have served as president at some point had she never relocated away from Southern California). Each of these speakers has unique experience from their own careers that they will share with us so we can take pause and consider their insights and wisdom for how to navigate a successful and satisfying career.

Impact of Trauma Verification Level on Management and Outcomes of Combined Traumatic Brain and Solid Organ Injuries: An NTDB Retrospective Review.

BACKGROUND: Level-I and level-II trauma centers are required to offer equivalent resources since "The Orange Book." This study evaluates differences between level-I and level-II management of solid organ injury (SOI) with traumatic brain injury (TBI). METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of the National Trauma Data Banks from 2013 to 2021 of adult (≥18 years), blunt trauma patients with both TBI and SOI treated at level-I or level-II trauma centers. RESULTS: 48,479 TBI and SOI patients were identified, 32,611 (67.3%) at level-I centers. Unadjusted incidence of laparotomy was higher at level I (14.5% vs 11.7%, P < 0.001), and angiography rates were similar (3.3% vs 3.4%, P 0.717). Sub-group analysis of stable patients (SBP ≥100) showed an increase in nonoperative management at level II (87.3% vs 88.7%, P < 0.001) and decrease in laparotomy (9.9% vs 8.3%, P < 0.001). On logistic regression (LR), severe TBI, high-grade SOI, and level I trauma status were predictors of laparotomy. Logistic regression showed mild/moderate TBI with high-grade SOI and level II were associated with use of angiography. Unadjusted mortality rates were slightly different (14.8% vs 13.4%, P < 0.001), but there was no association with trauma level on LR. DISCUSSION: Nonoperative management was seen more at level-II centers with laparotomy at level I. Subgroup analysis showed no difference in mortality in trauma levels. Matched patients for level I and II showed no statistical difference in management. Patients were treated similarly at both levels with similar outcomes and mortality.

Factors associated with increased 30-day re-operation risk in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: Revision surgery following isolated anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) has often focused on mid- to long-term revisions due to re-rupture, while short-term 30-day revision is a rare, but underappreciated entity. This study aims to characterize incidence and risk factors for reoperations following isolated ACLR. METHODS: This is a retrospective case-control analysis of the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Database (NSQIP) database from 2005 to 2017. Current Procedural Terminology codes were used to identify elective isolated ACLR patients. Patients undergoing reoperations were analyzed using bivariate analysis against their respective perioperative variables. Multivariate stepwise logistic regression was used to identify independent risk factors for reoperations after ACLR. RESULTS: 12,790 patients were included in the study. 37.0% of patients were female. Mean age was 32.2+/-10.7 years and mean body mass index (BMI) was 27.8+/-6.5 kg/m2, with 28.9% of patients with BMI > 30. The most frequently reported reason for reoperation based on CPT and ICD-9/10 codes was postoperative infection (0.5%). Overall reoperation rate was approximately 0.5%. Multivariate analysis identified operative time >1.5 h (OR 2.6 [95% CI; 1.5-4.4]), dependent functional status (OR 14.0 [1.4-141.6]), and adjunctive anesthesia (OR 2.4 [95% CI; 1.1-5.0]) as independent risk factors for reoperation. Female sex was a protective factor against reoperations (OR 0.6 [0.3-0.98]). CONCLUSION: Primary, isolated ACLR is associated with extremely low rates of short-term reoperations. Operative time >1.5 h, dependent functional status, and adjunctive anesthesia were independent risk factors for reoperation and female sex was a protective factor against reoperation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III. Retrospective cohort study.

Development of a reliable surgical quality assurance tool for gastrectomy in oncological trials.

BACKGROUND: Despite its recognized importance, there is currently no reliable tool for surgical quality assurance (SQA) of gastrectomy in surgical oncology. The aim of this study was to develop an SQA tool for gastrectomy and to apply this tool within the ADDICT Trial in order to assess the extent and completeness of lymphadenectomy. METHODS: The operative steps for D1+ and D2 gastrectomy have been previously described in the literature and ADDICT trial manual. Two researchers also performed fieldwork in the UK and Japan to document key operative steps through photographs and semi-structured interviews with expert surgeons. This provided the steps that were used as the framework for the SQA tool. Sixty-two photographic cases from the ADDICT Trial were rated by three independent surgeons. Generalizability (G) theory determined inter-rater reliability. D-studies examined the effect of varying the number of assessors and photographic series they rated. Chi-square assessed intra-rater reliability, comparing how the individual assessor's responses corresponded to their global rating for extent of lymphadenectomy. RESULTS: The tool comprised 20 items, including 19 anatomical landmarks and a global rating score. Overall reliability had G-coefficient of 0.557. Internal consistency was measured with a Cronbach's alpha score of 0.869 and Chi-square confirmed intra-rater reliability for each assessor as < 0.05. CONCLUSIONS: A photographic surgical quality assurance tool is presented for gastrectomy. Using this tool, the assessor can reliably determine not only the quality but also the extent of the lymphadenectomy performed based on remaining anatomy rather than the excised specimen.

Impact of postoperative pancreatic fistula on outcomes in pancreatoduodenectomy: a comprehensive analysis of American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program data.

BACKGROUND: Pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) is a major surgical procedure associated with significant risks, particularly postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF). Studies have highlighted the importance of certain risk factors for POPF, which are crucial for surgical decision-making and the management of high-risk patients undergoing PD. This study aimed to assess the surgical outcomes of patients undergoing PD who met the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery - Class D (ISGPS-D) criteria. METHODS: This study analyzed American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program data (2014-2021) for patients undergoing ISGPS-D PD, classified as having a soft pancreatic texture and a pancreatic duct of ≤3 mm. This study focused on mortality rates and the correlation between several factors and POPF (ISGPS grade B/C). RESULTS: From 5964 patients who underwent PD and met the ISGPS-D criteria, the 30-day mortality rate was 1.98%. Males had a higher incidence of POPF than females (57.42% vs 47.35%, respectively; P < .001). Patients with POPF experienced significantly higher rates of major postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ IIIa), including thrombosis, pneumonia, sepsis, delayed gastric emptying, wound disruption, infections, and acute renal failure. There was a marked increase in the 30-day readmission and mortality rates in patients with POPF (30.0% vs 17.6% and 3.2% vs 1.4%, respectively; all P < .001). Multivariate analysis highlighted female sex as a protective factor against mortality (odds ratio [OR], 0.47; P < .001) and extended hospital stay (>10 days) as a predictor of increased mortality risk (OR, 2.37; P < .001). CONCLUSION: This study underscored the significant association between POPF and increased postoperative morbidity and mortality rates. Future efforts should concentrate on refining surgical techniques and improving preoperative assessments to mitigate the risks associated with POPF in patients undergoing PD.

Surgical quality assessment of critical view of safety in 283 laparoscopic cholecystectomy videos by surgical residents and surgeons.

INTRODUCTION: Surgical quality assessment has improved the efficacy and efficiency of surgical training and has the potential to optimize the surgical learning curve. In laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC), the critical view of safety (CVS) can be assessed with a 6-point competency assessment tool (CAT), a task commonly performed by experienced surgeons. The aim of this study is to determine the capability of surgical residents to perform this assessment. METHODS: Both surgeons and surgical residents assessed unedited LC videos using a 6-point CVS, a CAT, using an online video assessment platform. The CAT consists of the following three criteria: 1. clearance of hepatocystic triangle, 2. cystic plate, and 3. two structures connect to the gallbladder, with a maximum of 2 points available for each criterion. A higher score indicates superior surgical performance. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was employed to assess the inter-rater reliability between surgeons and surgical residents. RESULTS: In total, 283 LC videos were assessed by 19 surgeons and 31 surgical residents. The overall ICC for all criteria was 0.628. Specifically, the ICC scores were 0.504 for criterion 1, 0.639 for criterion 2, and 0.719 for the criterion involving the two structures connected to the gallbladder. Consequently, only the criterion regarding clearance of the hepatocystic triangle exhibited fair agreement, whereas the other two criteria, as well as the overall scores, demonstrated good agreement. In 71% of cases, both surgeons and surgical residents scored a total score either ranging from 0 to 4 or from 5 to 6. CONCLUSION: Compared to the gold standard, i.e., the surgeons' assessments, surgical residents are equally skilled at assessing critical view of safety (CVS) in laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) videos. By incorporating video-based assessments of surgical procedures into their training, residents could potentially enhance their learning pace, which may result in better clinical outcomes.

Discharge within 1 day following elective single-level transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a propensityscore-matched analysis of predictors, complications, and readmission.

STUDY DESIGN: This was a retrospective case-control study using 8 years of data from a nationwide database of surgical outcomes in the United States. PURPOSE: This study aimed to improve our understanding of the risk factors associated with a length of stay (LOS) >1 day and aid in reducing postoperative hospitalization and complications. OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: Despite the proven safety of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF), some patients face prolonged postoperative hospitalization. METHODS: Data were collected from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program dataset from 2011 to 2018. The cohort was divided into patients with LOS up to 1 day (LOS ≤1 day), defined as same day or next-morning discharge, and patients with LOS >1 day (LOS >1 day). Univariable and multivariable regression analyses were performed to evaluate predictors of LOS >1 day. Propensity-score matching was performed to compare pre- and postdischarge complication rates. RESULTS: A total of 12,664 eligible patients with TLIF were identified, of which 14.8% had LOS ≤1 day and 85.2% had LOS >1 day. LOS >1 day was positively associated with female sex, Hispanic ethnicity, diagnosis of spondylolisthesis, American Society of Anesthesiologists classification 3, and operation length of >150 minutes. Patients with LOS >1 day were more likely to undergo intraoperative/postoperative blood transfusion (0.3% vs. 4.5%, p<0.001) and reoperation (0.1% vs. 0.6%, p=0.004). No significant differences in the rates of postdischarge complications were found between the matched groups. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with worsened preoperative status, preoperative diagnosis of spondylolisthesis, and prolonged operative time are more likely to require prolonged hospitalization and blood transfusions and undergo unplanned reoperation. To reduce the risk of prolonged hospitalization and associated complications, patients indicated for TLIF should be carefully selected.

Applications of artificial intelligence in surgery: clinical, technical, and governance considerations.

Artificial intelligence (AI) will power many of the tools in the armamentarium of digital surgeons. AI methods and surgical proof-of-concept flourish, but we have yet to witness clinical translation and value. Here we exemplify the potential of AI in the care pathway of colorectal cancer patients and discuss clinical, technical, and governance considerations of major importance for the safe translation of surgical AI for the benefit of our patients and practices.

Programmatic quality measures: a new model to promote surgical quality.

Health care performance metrics are offered predominantly in terms of outcomes, processes, or structural components of health care delivery. However, measurement is limited by variability in data sources, definitions, and workarounds. The American College of Surgeons has recently developed a new type of performance metric known as a "programmatic measure". These metrics align structures, processes, and outcomes to better coordinate quality measurement with support of frontline care teams. In this multifaceted way, these measures differ from current "single" measures such as targeting surgical site infection. The thematic focus of these measures and alignment of structure-resource components to support processes and outcomes also sets these measures apart from contemporary composite measures. Importantly, structural elements of these measures reflect minimum resources required for patient care, addressing staffing and resource barriers felt by local institutions in addressing numerous existing quality metrics. These metrics will streamline quality reporting to improve care navigation for patients. Clinicians will find more appropriately aligned goals and responsibilities, resulting in increased teamwork and communication. These measures are designed to address the current burdens of overabundant metrics, priority misalignment, and low resources in a patient-centric fashion to better align health care quality and measurement.

Earned outcomes correlate with reliability-adjusted surgical mortality after abdominal aortic aneurysm repair and predict future performance.

OBJECTIVE: Cumulative, probability-based metrics are regularly used to measure quality in professional sports, but these methods have not been applied to health care delivery. These techniques have the potential to be particularly useful in describing surgical quality, where case volume is variable and outcomes tend to be dominated by statistical "noise." The established statistical technique used to adjust for differences in case volume is reliability-adjustment, which emphasizes statistical "signal" but has several limitations. We sought to validate a novel measure of surgical quality based on earned outcomes methods (deaths above average [DAA]) against reliability-adjusted mortality rates, using abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair outcomes to illustrate the measure's performance. METHODS: Earned outcomes methods were used to calculate the outcome of interest for each patient: DAA. Hospital-level DAA was calculated for non-ruptured open AAA repair and endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) in the Vascular Quality Initiative database from 2016 to 2019. DAA for each center is the sum of observed - predicted risk of death for each patient; predicted risk of death was calculated using established multivariable logistic regression modeling. Correlations of DAA with reliability-adjusted mortality rates and procedure volume were determined. Because an accurate quality metric should correlate with future results, outcomes from 2016 to 2017 were used to categorize hospital quality based on: (1) risk-adjusted mortality; (2) risk- and reliability-adjusted mortality; and (3) DAA. The best performing quality metric was determined by comparing the ability of these categories to predict 2018 to 2019 risk-adjusted outcomes. RESULTS: During the study period, 3734 patients underwent open repair (106 hospitals), and 20,680 patients underwent EVAR (183 hospitals). DAA was closely correlated with reliability-adjusted mortality rates for open repair (r = 0.94; P < .001) and EVAR (r = 0.99; P < .001). DAA also correlated with hospital case volume for open repair (r = -.54; P < .001), but not EVAR (r = 0.07; P = .3). In 2016 to 2017, most hospitals had 0% mortality (55% open repair, 57% EVAR), making it impossible to evaluate these hospitals using traditional risk-adjusted mortality rates alone. Further, zero mortality hospitals in 2016 to 2017 did not demonstrate improved outcomes in 2018 to 2019 for open repair (3.8% vs 4.6%; P = .5) or EVAR (0.8% vs 1.0%; P = .2) compared with all other hospitals. In contrast to traditional risk-adjustment, 2016 to 2017 DAA evenly divided centers into quality quartiles that predicted 2018 to 2019 performance with increased mortality rate associated with each decrement in quality quartile (Q1, 3.2%; Q2, 4.0%; Q3, 5.1%; Q4, 6.0%). There was a significantly higher risk of mortality at worst quartile open repair hospitals compared with best quartile hospitals (odds ratio, 2.01; 95% confidence interval, 1.07-3.76; P = .03). Using 2016 to 2019 DAA to define quality, highest quality quartile open repair hospitals had lower median DAA compared with lowest quality quartile hospitals (-1.18 DAA vs +1.32 DAA; P < .001), correlating with lower median reliability-adjusted mortality rates (3.6% vs 5.1%; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Adjustment for differences in hospital volume is essential when measuring hospital-level outcomes. Earned outcomes accurately categorize hospital quality and correlate with reliability-adjustment but are easier to calculate and interpret. From 2016 to 2019, highest quality open AAA repair hospitals prevented >40 perioperative deaths compared with the average hospital, and >80 perioperative deaths compared with lowest quality hospitals.

Preoperative Risk Factors for Discharge to Facility After Surgery in Geriatric Patients.

BACKGROUND: The Geriatric Surgery Verification Program (GSV) was developed to address perioperative care for patients ≥75 years, with a goal of improving outcomes and functional abilities after surgery. We sought to evaluate preoperative factors that place patients at risk for inability to return home (ie, discharge to a facility). METHODS: Retrospective review of patients ≥75 years old who underwent inpatient surgery from January 2018 to December 2022 at a referral Veterans Administration Medical Center enrolled in the GSV program. Preoperative factors included fall history, mobility aids, housing status, function, cognition, and nutritional status. Postoperative outcomes were discharge designations as home and home with services compared to a facility (skilled nursing facility and acute rehab). Exclusion criteria included preoperative facility residence, cardiac surgery, hospital transfer, postoperative complications, hospice discharge, or in-hospital mortality. RESULTS: 605 patients met inclusion criteria and 173 (29%) excluded as above. Of the remaining 432 patients, mean age was 79 ± 5 and the majority were male, 426 (99%). The majority of patients were discharged home, 388 (90%), compared to a facility, 44 (10%). Patients with a fall history (OR: 2.95, 95% CI: 1.56, 5.57), utilizing a mobility aid (OR: 6.0, 95% CI: 2.8, 12.83), were partial or totally dependent (OR: 4.83, 95% CI: 2.29, 10.17), or who lived alone (OR: 2.57, 95% CI: 1.08, 6.07) had higher rates of discharge to a facility. DISCUSSION: Preoperative mobility compromise and functional dependence are associated with higher rates of discharge to a facility. These preoperative factors are possibly modifiable with multidisciplinary care teams to decrease risks of facility placement.