The incidence of and risk factors for radiation pneumonitis in patients treated with simultaneous bevacizumab and thoracic radiotherapy.

BACKGROUND: First-line chemotherapy combined with bevacizumab is one of the standard treatment modes for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Thoracic radiotherapy (TRT) can provide significant local control and survival benefits to patients during the treatment of advanced NSCLC. However, the safety of adding TRT has always been controversial, especially because of the occurrence of radiation pneumonia (RP) during bevacizumab treatment. Therefore, in this study, we used an expanded sample size to evaluate the incidence of RP when using bevacizumab in combination with TRT. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Using an institutional query system, all medical records of patients with NSCLC who received TRT during first-line chemotherapy combined with bevacizumab from 2017 to 2020 at Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute were reviewed. RP was diagnosed via computed tomography and was classified according to the RTOG toxicity scoring system. The risk factors for RP were identified using univariate and multivariate analyses. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: Ultimately, 119 patients were included. Thirty-eight (31.9%) patients developed Grade ≥ 2 RP, of whom 27 (68.1%) had Grade 2 RP and 11 (9.2%) had Grade 3 RP. No patients developed Grade 4 or 5 RP. The median time for RP occurrence was 2.7 months (range 1.2-5.4 months). In univariate analysis, male, age, KPS score, V20 > 16.9%, V5 > 33.6%, PTV (planning target volume)-dose > 57.2 Gy, and PTV-volume > 183.85 cm3 were correlated with the occurrence of RP. In multivariate analysis, male, V20 > 16.9%, and PTV-volume > 183.85 cm3 were identified as independent predictors of RP occurrence. The mPFS of all patients was 14.27 (95% CI, 13.1-16.1) months. The one-year and two-year PFS rates were 64.9% and 20.1%, respectively. The mOS of all patients was 37.09 (95% CI, 33.8-42.0) months. The one-year survival rate of all patients was 95%, and the two-year survival rate was 71.4%. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of Grade ≥ 2 RP in NSCLC patients who received both bevacizumab and TRT was 31.9%. Restricting factors such as V20 and PTV will help reduce the risk of RP in these patients. For patients who receive both bevacizumab and TRT, caution should be exercised when increasing TRT, and treatment strategies should be optimized to reduce the incidence of RP.

Neutrophil­to­lymphocyte ratio reflects lung injury in thoracic radiotherapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors combination therapy with different sequences.

The combination of thoracic radiotherapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has emerged as a novel treatment approach for malignant tumors. However, it is important to consider the potential exacerbation of lung injury associated with this treatment modality. The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), an inflammatory marker, holds promise as a non-invasive indicator for assessing the toxicity of this combination therapy. To investigate this further, a study involving 80 patients who underwent thoracic radiotherapy in conjunction with ICIs was conducted. These patients were divided into two groups: The concurrent therapy group and the sequential therapy group. A logistic regression analysis was conducted to ascertain risk factors for grade ≥2 pneumonitis. Following propensity score matching, the NLR values were examined between the concurrent group and the sequential group to evaluate any disparity. A mouse model of radiation pneumonitis was established, and ICIs were administered at varying time points. The morphological evaluation of lung injury was conducted using H&E staining, while the NLR values of peripheral blood were detected through flow cytometry. Logistic regression analysis revealed that radiation dosimetric parameters (mean lung dose, total dose and V20), the inflammatory index NLR at the onset of pneumonitis, and treatment sequences (concurrent or sequential) were identified as independent predictors of grade ≥2 treatment-related pneumonitis. The results of the morphological evaluation indicated that the severity of lung tissue injury was greater in cases where programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) blockade was administered during thoracic radiotherapy, compared with cases where PD-1 blockade was administered 14 days after radiotherapy. Moreover, the present study demonstrated that the non-invasive indicator known as the NLR has the potential to accurately reflect the aforementioned injury.

Radiation pneumonitis after concurrent aumolertinib and thoracic radiotherapy in EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer patients.

BACKGROUND: The superior efficacy of concurrent thoracic radiotherapy (TRT) and epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) has been proven in locally advanced and advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with EGFR mutations. However, the high incidence of radiation pneumonitis (RP) reduced by concurrent TRT and TKIs has attracted widespread attention. Thus, this study was designed to investigate the rate and risk factors for RP in EGFR-positive NSCLC patients simultaneously treated with aumolertinib and TRT. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated stage IIIA-IVB NSCLC patients treated with concurrent aumolertinib and TRT between May 2020 and December 2022 at Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong, China. RP was diagnosed by two senior radiologists and then graded from 1 to 5 according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v5.0. All risk factors were evaluated by univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses. RESULTS: A total of 49 patients were included, the incidence of grade ≥ 2 RP was 42.9%. Grade 2 and 3 RP were observed in 28.6% and 14.3% of patients, respectively. Grade 4 to 5 RP were not observed. the gross total volume (GTV) ≥ 21 ml and ipsilateral lung V20 ≥ 25% were risk factors for RP. The median progression-free survival (PFS) in the first-line therapy group and second-line therapy group were 23.5 months and 17.2 months, respectively (p = 0.10). CONCLUSIONS: Better local control is achieved with concurrent TRT and aumolertinib, and special attention should be given to controlling ipsilateral lung V20 and GTV to reduce the risk of RP.

Efficacy and safety of thoracic radiotherapy in extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer patients receiving first-line immunotherapy plus chemotherapy: a propensity score matched multicentre retrospective analysis.

BACKGROUND: Platinum-etoposide chemotherapy combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has been recommended as the first-line standard treatment for extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC). However, the effect of thoracic radiotherapy (TRT) on these patients is still unknown. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of TRT for ES-SCLC patients who responded to first-line ICIs and chemotherapy (CHT). METHODS: Patients who received 4 to 6 cycles of ICIs and CHT as first-line therapy at three hospitals between 2018 and 2022 were included in the analysis. All patients were divided into two groups based on whether they received TRT as first-line treatment, and propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to ensure that the characteristics of two groups were well-balanced. The primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), and the secondary endpoint was toxic effects. RESULTS: A total of 276 patients were included, and the median follow-up time was 22.3 (range, 4.0-53.73) months. After PSM, 197 patients were further analysed, and 99 of whom received TRT. The baseline characteristics were well-balanced between patients in the TRT and non-TRT groups. There were significant differences in PFS between the TRT and non-TRT groups, with the median PFS of 10.76 and 7.63 months, respectively (P = 0.014). Significantly improved OS was observed in the TRT group (21.67 vs. 16.6 months, P = 0.009). In addition, the use of TRT was an independent prognostic factor for PFS and OS of ES-SCLC patients receiving ICIs plus CHT. In terms of safety, no significant increase of any grades adverse event (AE) (P = 0.874) and G3-4 AE (P = 0.909) was observed for patients receiving TRT. Radiation esophagitis, gastrointestinal and hematologic toxicities were the most common AEs in TRT group, which were tolerable. And high-dose radiotherapy was associated with higher incidence of pneumonitis. CONCLUSION: Addition of TRT showed significant survival benefits and well tolerability in ES-SCLC patients receiving platinum-etoposide CHT and ICIs, which could be a feasible first-line treatment strategy for ES-SCLC patients.

A retrospective analysis of optimal timing of thoracic radiotherapy for driver gene-negative metastatic non-small cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: The optimal timing of thoracic radiotherapy (TRT) in driver-gene-negative metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (mNSCLC) patients was retrospectively investigated based on survival and safety profile. METHODS: The efficacy and safety data of driver-gene-negative mNSCLC patients treated with TRT during maintenance after first-line therapy was collected. Patients whose primary tumor and metastatic lesions remained no progression during maintenance and then received TRT were categorized as the NP (no progression) group, while patients who experienced slow progression during maintenance without reaching progressive disease and then received TRT were categorized as the SP (slow progression) group. The efficacy and adverse events of TRT were analyzed. RESULTS: In total, 149 driver-gene-negative mNSCLC patients treated with TRT during maintenance were enrolled into the study, with 119 in the NP group and 30 in the SP group. After a median follow-up of 30.83 (range: 26.62-35.04) months, the median progression-free survival (PFS) in the NP group was 11.13 versus 9.53 months in the SP group (HR 0.599, p = 0.017). The median overall survival (OS) in the NP group was 32.27 versus 25.57 months in the SP group (HR 0.637, p = 0.088). The median PFS after radiotherapy (rPFS) was 6.33 versus 3.90 months (HR 0.288, p < 0.001). The adverse events were tolerable and manageable in both groups without significant difference (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: The addition of TRT during the pre-emptive no progression phase was associated with a significantly longer PFS than during the delayed slow progression phase and had an acceptable safety profile. Our results might support the earlier initiation of TRT after induction therapy for some patients with driver-gene-negative mNSCLC.

Efficacy and safety of anti-PD-1 inhibitor versus anti-PD-L1 inhibitor in first-line treatment of extensive-stage small cell lung cancer: a multicenter retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Immunotherapy targeting PD-1/PD-L1 has revolutionized the treatment of extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC). However, clinical trials suggest differential efficacy of anti-PD-1 agents and anti-PD-L1 agents in first-line treatment of ES-SCLC. This retrospective multicenter study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of anti-PD-1 agents versus anti-PD-L1 agents in first-line treatment of ES-SCLC in real-world practice. METHODS: Patients with pathologically or cytologically confirmed ES-SCLC treated with platinum plus etoposide combined with anti-PD-1 or PD-L1 agents as first-line treatment in different centers of PLA General Hospital between January 2017 and October 2021 were included for this study. Survival outcomes and safety were compared between patients receiving anti-PD-1 and PD-L1 agents. RESULTS: Of the total 154 included patients, 68 received anti-PD-1 agents plus chemotherapy (PD-1 group), and 86 received anti-PD-L1 agents plus chemotherapy (PD-L1 group). Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in the entire cohort were 7.6 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 6.5-8.2 months) and 17.4 months (95% CI: 15.3-19.3 months), respectively. Median PFS and OS were comparable between the PD-1 group and PD-L1 group (PFS: 7.6 months vs. 8.3 months, HR = 1.13, 95% CI: 0.79-1.62, p = 0.415; OS: 26.9 months vs. 25.6 months, HR = 0.96, 95% CI: 0.63-1.47, p = 0.859. The objective response rate and disease control rate were comparable between the two groups: 79.4% vs. 79.1% and 92.6% vs. 94.2%, respectively. The 6-month, 12-month, and 18-month PFS and OS rates were slightly higher in the PD-L1 group than in the PD-1 group, while the 24-month PFS rate was slightly higher in the PD-1 group than in the PD-L1 group. Stratified analysis showed that locoregional thoracic radiotherapy and normal lactate dehydrogenase level were independent predictors of better OS in ES-SCLC patients treated with first-line chemotherapy plus ICI. Adverse events were not significantly different between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Anti-PD-1 agents and anti-PD-L1 agents combined with chemotherapy as first-line treatment for ES-SCLC are comparably effective and well tolerated.

Treatment-related pneumonitis after thoracic radiotherapy/chemoradiotherapy combined with anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibodies in advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

PURPOSE: This study aims to evaluate the risk factors of treatment-related pneumonitis (TRP) following thoracic radiotherapy/chemoradiotherapy combined with anti-PD­1 monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) in patients with advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 97 patients with advanced ESCC who were treated with thoracic radiotherapy/chemoradiotherapy combined with anti-PD­1 mAbs. Among them, 56 patients received concurrent radiotherapy with anti-PD­1 mAbs and 41 patients received sequential radiotherapy with anti-PD­1 mAbs. The median prescribed planning target volume (PTV) dose was 59.4 Gy (range from 50.4 to 66 Gy, 1.8-2.2 Gy/fraction). Clinical characteristics, the percentage of lung volume receiving more than 5-50 Gy in increments of 5 Gy (V5-V50, respectively) and the mean lung dose (MLD) were analyzed as potential risk factors for TRP. RESULTS: 46.4% (45/97), 20.6% (20/97), 20.6% (20/97), 4.1% (4/97), and 1.0% (1/97) of the patients developed any grade of TRP, grade 1 TRP, grade 2 TRP, grade 3 TRP, and fatal (grade 5) TRP, respectively. Anti-PD­1 mAbs administered concurrently with radiotherapy, V5, V10, V15, V25, V30, V35, V40 and MLD were associated with the occurrence of grade 2 or higher TRP. Concurrent therapy (P = 0.010, OR = 3.990) and V5 (P = 0.001, OR = 1.126) were independent risk factors for grade 2 or higher TRP. According to the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, the optimal V5 threshold for predicting grade 2 or higher TRP was 55.7%. CONCLUSION: The combination of thoracic radiotherapy/chemoradiotherapy with anti-PD­1 mAbs displayed a tolerable pulmonary safety profile. Although the incidence of TRP was high, grade 1-2 TRP accounted for the majority. Anti-PD­1 mAbs administered concurrently with radiotherapy and the lung V5 were significantly associated with the occurrence of grade 2 or higher TRP. Therefore, it seems safer to control V5 below 55% in clinical, especially for the high-risk populations receiving concurrent therapy.

Intrathoracic Progression Is Still the Most Dominant Failure Pattern after First-Line Chemo-immunotherapy in Extensive-Stage Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Implications for Thoracic Radiotherapy.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to compare the failure patterns before and after the introduction of immunotherapy and to determine the role of thoracic radiotherapy (TRT) in extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 294 patients with ES-SCLC, of which 62.2% underwent chemotherapy alone, 13.3% underwent chemotherapy followed by consolidative TRT (TRT group), and 24.5% underwent chemotherapy with immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI group). We performed propensity-score matching (PSM) to compare each treatment group. RESULTS: The median follow-up duration was 10.4 months. At the first relapse, in the cohort showing objective response, the proportion of cases showing intrathoracic progression was significantly lower in the TRT group (37.8%) than in the chemotherapy-alone (77.2%, p < 0.001) and the ICI (60.3%, p=0.03) groups. Furthermore, in the subgroup analysis, TRT showed benefits related to intrathoracic progression-free survival (PFS) in comparison with ICI in patients with less than two involved extrathoracic sites (p=0.008) or without liver metastasis (p=0.02) or pleural metastasis (p=0.005) at diagnosis. After PSM, the TRT group showed significantly better intrathoracic PFS than both chemotherapy-alone and ICI groups (p < 0.001 and p=0.04, respectively), but showed no significant benefit in terms of PFS and overall survival in comparison with the ICI group (p=0.17 and p=0.31, respectively). CONCLUSION: In ES-SCLC, intrathoracic progression was the most dominant failure pattern after immunotherapy. In the era of chemoimmunotherapy, consolidative TRT can still be considered a useful treatment strategy for locoregional control.

Chemoimmunotherapy combined with consolidative thoracic radiotherapy for extensive-stage small cell lung cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of chemoimmunotherapy combined with consolidative thoracic radiation therapy (cTRT) in patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC). METHODS: A meta-analysis was conducted. PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library were searched. The study was registered in PROSPERO (registration no. CRD42023410344). RESULTS: A total of 4677 studies were initially screened and 15 studies encompassing a total of 1033 patients were included. Chemoimmunotherapy combined with cTRT significantly improved survival (HR = 0.52, 95 % CI: 0.39, 0.68) with favorable 6-month (0.89, 95 % CI: 0.77, 1.00) and 1-year (0.77, 95 % CI: 0.72, 0.82) OS, without affecting ≥3 grade TRAEs (RR = 1.29, 95 % CI: 0.85, 1.98). Pooled 6-month and 1-year PFS were 0.67 (95 % CI: 0.47, 0.86) and 0.38 (95 % CI: 0.22, 0.55), respectively. Incidence of ≥3 grade TRAEs was 0.24 (95 % CI: 0.08, 0.39) and radiation pneumonitis was 0.03 (95 % CI: 0.01, 0.06). CONCLUSIONS: Chemoimmunotherapy combined with cTRT improves survival and shows favorable outcomes in ES-SCLC patients, with manageable adverse events. Further research with larger samples is needed to confirm these findings.

First-site-metastasis pattern in patients with inoperable stage III NSCLC treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy with or without immune check-point inhibition: a retrospective analysis.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to investigate a first-site-metastasis pattern (FSMP) in unresectable stage III NSCLC after concurrent chemoradiotherapy (cCRT) with or without immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI). METHODS: We defined three patient subgroups according to the year of initial multimodal treatment: A (2011-2014), B (2015-2017) and C (2018-2020). Different treatment-related parameters were analyzed. Observed outcome parameters were brain metastasis-free survival (BMFS), extracranial distant metastasis-free survival (ecDMFS) and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS). RESULTS: 136 patients treated between 2011 and 2020 were included with ≥ 60.0 Gy total dose and concurrent chemotherapy (cCRT); thirty-six (26%) received ICI. Median follow-up was 49.7 (range:0.7-126.1), median OS 31.2 (95% CI:16.4-30.3) months (23.4 for non-ICI vs not reached for ICI patients, p = 0.001). Median BMFS/ecDMFS/DMFS in subgroups A, B and C was 14.9/16.3/14.7 months, 20.6/12.9/12.7 months and not reached (NR)/NR/36.4 months (p = 0.004/0.001/0.016). For cCRT+ICI median BMFS was 53.1 vs. 19.1 months for cCRT alone (p = 0.005). Median ecDMFS achieved 55.2 vs. 17.9 (p = 0.003) and median DMFS 29.5 (95% CI: 1.4-57.6) vs 14.93 (95% CI:10.8-19.0) months (p = 0.031), respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that age over 65 (HR:1.629; p = 0.036), GTV ≥ 78 cc (HR: 2.100; p = 0.002) and V20 ≥ 30 (HR: 2.400; p = 0.002) were negative prognosticators for BMFS and GTV ≥ 78 cc for ecDMFS (HR: 1.739; p = 0.027). After onset of brain metastasis (BM), patients survived 13.3 (95% CI: 6.4-20.2) months and 8.6 months (95% CI: 1.6-15.5) after extracranial-distant-metastasis (ecDM). Patients with ecDM as FSMP reached significantly worse overall survival of 22.1 (range:14.4-29.8) vs. 40.1 (range:18.7-61.3) months (p = 0.034) in the rest of cohort. In contrast, BM as FSMP had no impact on OS. CONCLUSION: This retrospective analysis of inoperable stage III NSCLC patients revealed that age over 65, V20 ≥ 30 and GTV ≥ 78 cc were prognosticators for BMFS and GTV ≥ 78 cc for ecDMFS. ICI treatment led to a significant improvement of BMFS, ecDMFS and DMFS. ecDM as FSMP was associated with significant deterioration of OS, whereas BM as FSMP was not.

Reflecting on the cardiac toxicity in non-small cell lung cancer in the era of immune checkpoint inhibitors therapy combined with thoracic radiotherapy.

In recent years, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have become a widely used treatment for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and the combination with traditional radiotherapy (RT) has shown significant potential in prolonging patient survival. However, both thoracic RT and ICIs can lead to cardiac toxicity, including radiation-induced heart damage (RIHD) and immunotherapy-related heart damage (IRHD). It still remains uncertain whether the combination of thoracic RT and immunotherapy will exacerbate acute or late cardiovascular (CV) toxicity and incidence. In this review, we summarize safety data from relevant clinical studies regarding CV toxicity for the combination therapy in NSCLC patients, explore the underlying synergetic mechanisms and common risk factors, and proposed treatment and management strategies. We hope to increase emphasis on the long-term assessment of CV toxicity risks associated with the combination therapy, and reduce the incidence of CV deaths resulting from such regimens.

Safety and efficacy of thoracic radiotherapy combined with chemo-immunotherapy in patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer: a multicenter retrospective analysis.

Background: Immunotherapy has greatly increased the survival time of patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC), and is now a standard first-line treatment for these patients. Increasing evidence suggests a possible synergistic effect between immunotherapy and radiotherapy, yet there is a paucity of evidence regarding the efficacy and safety of thoracic radiotherapy (TRT) combined with chemo-immunotherapy for ES-SCLC. Methods: The medical records of 78 consecutive patients with ES-SCLC who received TRT in combination with chemo-immunotherapy at Jinling Hospital and Jiangsu Cancer Hospital from January 2019 to January 2023 were retrospectively reviewed. The median overall survival (mOS) time and median progression-free survival (mPFS) time were used to evaluate efficacy, and the incidence of adverse events (AEs) was used to evaluate safety. Results: The median follow-up time was 31.9 months, the objective response rate (ORR) was 59%, and the disease control rate (DCR) was 89.8%. The mOS time was 20.0 months, and the 6-month OS rate was 95%. The mPFS time was 9.2 months, and the 6-month PFS rate was 78%. There were no treatment-related deaths. The incidence of pneumonitis was 23.1%, the incidence of radiation esophagitis was 5.1%, and 2 patients experienced high-grade pneumonitis. Primary liver metastasis was a predictor of poor OS and PFS. Patients who received consolidative TRT after chemo-immunotherapy experienced more benefit than those who received TRT as palliative or salvage treatment for superior vena cava syndrome or disease progression. Conclusions: TRT is a feasible treatment for patients who receive chemo-immunotherapy for the management of ES-SCLC in consideration of its considerable efficacy and tolerable safety risk. This treatment is especially useful for patients without primary liver metastasis and who receive consolidative TRT after chemo-immunotherapy. Large-scale prospective studies are needed to confirm the efficacy and safety of this treatment modality.

The role of thoracic consolidative radiotherapy in the setting of immunotherapy in extensive stage small cell lung cancer.

The improvement in treatment strategies and outcomes in small cell lung cancer (SCLC) has lagged behind other cancers. The addition of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), durvalumab and atezolizumab, to the platinum-based chemotherapy in frontline setting has improved the survival in extensive stage SCLC, (ES-SCLC), albeit modestly, and is now the new standard of care. Prior to advent of immunotherapy into the therapeutic armamentarium in ES-SCLC, consolidative thoracic radiotherapy (TRT) was associated with improved thoracic control and survival outcomes. In the era of ICIs, the role of TRT is not well defined, chiefly because TRT was not incorporated in any immunotherapy trials, secondly due to concerns regarding the increased risks of pneumonitis, and finally uncertain magnitude of benefit with this combined approach. In principle, radiation can increase in the immunogenicity of tumor and hence the activity of immune checkpoint blockade, thereby increasing efficacy both locally and distantly. Such an approach has been promising in non-small cell lung cancer with ICIs improving outcomes after concurrent chemoradiation, but remains unanswered in ES-SCLC. It is, thus, possible that the modest improvement in survival by addition of ICIs to chemotherapy in ES-SCLC can be further improved by the incorporation of consolidative TRT in selected patients. Several early phase trials and retrospective studies have suggested that such an approach may be feasible and safe. Prospective trials are ongoing to answer whether adding radiation therapy to chemoimmunotherapy will improve outcomes in ES-SCLC.

Radiotherapy for extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer in the immunotherapy era.

Currently, chemoimmunotherapy is the first-line treatment for extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC). However, only 0.8%-2.5% of the patients presented complete response after chemoimmunotherapy. Considering that ES-SCLC is highly sensitive to radiotherapy, the addition of radiotherapy after first-line treatment for ES-SCLC could further improve local control, which may be beneficial for patients' survival. Prior studies have shown that consolidative thoracic radiotherapy (cTRT) can decrease disease progression and improve overall survival in patients with ES-SCLC who respond well to chemotherapy. However, the efficacy and safety of cTRT in the immunotherapy era remain unclear owing to a lack of prospective studies. Prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) has been shown to decrease brain metastasis (BM) and prolong survival in patients with limited-stage SCLC in previous reports. However, according to current guidelines, PCI is not commonly recommended for ES-SCLC. Immunotherapy has the potential to reduce the incidence of BM. Whether PCI can be replaced with regular magnetic resonance imaging surveillance for ES-SCLC in the era of immunotherapy remains controversial. Whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT) is the standard treatment for BM in SCLC patients. Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has shown promise in the treatment of limited BM. Considering the potential of immunotherapy to decrease BM, it is controversial whether SRS can replace WBRT for limited BM in the immunotherapy era. Additionally, with the addition of immunotherapy, the role of palliative radiotherapy may be weakened in patients with asymptomatic metastatic lesions. However, it is still indispensable and urgent for patients with obvious symptoms of metastatic disease, such as spinal cord compression, superior vena cava syndrome, lobar obstruction, and weight-bearing metastases, which may critically damage the quality of life and prognosis. To improve the outcome of ES-SCLC, we discuss the feasibility of radiotherapy, including cTRT, PCI, WBRT/SRS, and palliative radiotherapy with immunotherapy based on existing evidence, which may offer specific prospects for further randomized trials and clinical applications.

Twenty-Month Regression Following Concurrent Conventional Whole-Brain Irradiation and Chemoimmunotherapy for ≥3.8 cm Cerebellar Metastasis From Small Cell Lung Cancer.

Standard whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) alone for large brain metastases (BMs) from small cell lung cancer (SCLC) has limited efficacy and durability, and stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) alone for symptomatic posterior fossa BMs >3 cm with satellite lesions is challenging. Herein, we describe the case of a 73-year-old female presenting with treatment-naïve SCLC and 15 symptomatic multiple BMs, including a ≥3.8-cm cerebellar mass (≥17.7 cm3) and two adjacent lesions; otherwise, the SCLC was confined to the thorax. The patient was initially treated concurrently with conventional WBRT (30 Gy in 10 fractions) without boost and chemoimmunotherapy (CIT) consisting of carboplatin, etoposide, and atezolizumab. Atezolizumab was excluded during irradiation. Five months after WBRT, the large cerebellar lesion had remarkably regressed, and the smaller lesions (≤17 mm) showed complete responses (CRs) without local progression at 20 months. However, six and 16 months after WBRT, the thoracic lesions had progressed, and although amrubicin was administered, four new BMs, including pons involvement, had developed, respectively. Despite the CRs of the four BMs following SRS (49.6 Gy in eight fractions) and the sustained regression of the thoracic lesions, meningeal dissemination and multiple new BMs were evident 3.5 months post-SRS. The small remnant of the large BM and/or newly developed BMs abutting the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) space could have led to CSF dissemination, the presumed cause of the patient's death. Taken together, concurrent chemo-WBRT and subsequent CIT can provide excellent and durable tumor responses for SCLC BMs, but may not be fully sufficient for BMs ≥3.8 cm. Therefore, in cases with large lesions, focal dose escalation of the large lesions, consolidative thoracic radiotherapy, and dose de-escalation in the macroscopically unaffected brain region may prevent or attenuate CSF dissemination, new BM development, and adverse effects and thus should be considered.

Assessment of short-term effects of thoracic radiotherapy on the cardiovascular parasympathetic and sympathetic nervous systems.

Background: Prior research suggests that cardiovascular autonomic dysfunction might be an early marker of cardiotoxicity induced by antitumor treatment and act as an early predictor of cardiovascular disease-related morbidity and mortality. The impact of thoracic radiotherapy on the parasympathetic and sympathetic nervous systems, however, remains unclear. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the short-term effects of thoracic radiotherapy on the autonomic nervous system, using deceleration capacity (DC), acceleration capacity (AC) of heart rate, and heart rate variability (HRV) as assessment tools. Methods: A 5 min electrocardiogram was collected from 58 thoracic cancer patients before and after thoracic radiotherapy for DC, AC, and HRV analysis. HRV parameters employed included the standard deviation of the normal-normal interval (SDNN), root mean square of successive interval differences (RMSSD), low frequency power (LF), high frequency power (HF), total power (TP), and the LF to HF ratio. Some patients also received systemic therapies alongside radiotherapy; thus, patients were subdivided into a radiotherapy-only group (28 cases) and a combined radiotherapy and systemic therapies group (30 cases) for additional subgroup analysis. Results: Thoracic radiotherapy resulted in a significant reduction in DC (8.5 [5.0, 14.2] vs. 5.3 [3.5, 9.4], p = 0.002) and HRV parameters SDNN (9.9 [7.03, 16.0] vs. 8.2 [6.0, 12.4], p = 0.003), RMSSD (9.9 [6.9, 17.5] vs. 7.7 [4.8, 14.3], p = 0.009), LF (29 [10, 135] vs. 24 [15, 50], p = 0.005), HF (35 [12, 101] vs. 16 [9, 46], p = 0.002), TP (74 [41, 273] vs. 50 [33, 118], p < 0.001), and a significant increase in AC (-8.2 [-14.8, -4.9] vs. -5.8 [-10.1, -3.3], p = 0.003) and mean heart rate (79.8 ± 12.6 vs. 83.9 ± 13.6, p = 0.010). Subgroup analysis indicated similar trends in mean heart rate, DC, AC, and HRV parameters (SDNN, RMSSD, LF, HF, TP) in both the radiotherapy group and the combined treatment group post-radiotherapy. No statistically significant difference was noted in the changes observed in DC, AC, and HRV between the two groups pre- and post-radiotherapy. Conclusion: Thoracic radiotherapy may induce cardiovascular autonomic dysfunction by reducing parasympathetic activity and enhancing sympathetic activity. Importantly, the study found that the concurrent use of systemic therapies did not significantly amplify or contribute to the alterations in autonomic function in the short-term following thoracic radiotherapy. DC, AC and HRV are promising and feasible biomarkers for evaluating autonomic dysfunction caused by thoracic radiotherapy.

Efficacy and safety of thoracic radiotherapy for extensive stage small cell lung cancer after immunotherapy in real world.

The immunotherapy combined chemotherapy has been the standard treatment strategy for extensive-stage small lung cancer (ES-SCLC). The CREST trial reported consolidative thoracic radiotherapy (cTRT) improved overall survival (OS) for ES-SCLC with intrathoracic residual after chemotherapy. In this study, patients with ES-SCLC who received immunotherapy were assigned to receive either TRT or no TRT. TRT significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS), local recurrence-free survival (LRFS) and OS with well tolerated toxicity. Further sub-cohort analysis, TRT significantly improved LRFS in patients with oligo-metastasis and without liver metastasis.

Real-world outcomes of PD-L1 inhibitors combined with thoracic radiotherapy in the first-line treatment of extensive stage small cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: The CREST study showed that the addition of thoracic radiotherapy (TRT) could improve the survival rate in patients with extensive stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC), but whether TRT can bring survival benefit in the era of immunotherapy remains controversial. This study aimed to explore the efficacy and safety of adding TRT to the combination of PD-L1 inhibitors and chemotherapy. METHODS: The patients who received durvalumab or atezolizumab combined with chemotherapy as the first-line treatment of ES-SCLC from January 2019 to December 2021 were enrolled. They were divided into two groups, based on whether they received TRT or not. Propensity score matching (PSM) with a 1:1 ratio was performed. The primary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and safety. RESULTS: A total of 211 patients with ES-SCLC were enrolled, of whom 70 (33.2%) patients received standard therapy plus TRT as first-line treatment, and 141 (66.8%) patients in the control group received PD-L1 inhibitors plus chemotherapy. After PSM, a total of 57 pairs of patients were enrolled in the analysis. In all patients, the median PFS (mPFS) in the TRT and non-TRT group was 9.5 and 7.2 months, respectively, with HR = 0.59 (95%CI 0.39-0.88, p = 0.009). The median OS (mOS) in the TRT group was also significantly longer than that in the non-TRT group (24.1 months vs. 18.5 months, HR = 0.53, 95%CI 0.31-0.89, p = 0.016). Multivariable analysis showed that baseline liver metastasis and the number of metastases ≥ 3 were independent prognostic factors for OS. Addition of TRT increased the incidence of treatment-related pneumonia (p = 0.018), most of which were grade 1-2. CONCLUSIONS: Addition of TRT to durvalumab or atezolizumab plus chemotherapy significantly improves survival in ES-SCLC. Although it may leads to increased incidence of treatment-related pneumonia, a majority of the cases can be relieved after symptomatic treatment.

Analysis of heart displacement during thoracic radiotherapy based on electrocardiograph-gated 4-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging.

Background: Periodic cardiac movement may expose the heart to radiation field induced damage, leading to radiation-induced heart disease (RIHD). Studies have proven that delineation of the heart based on planning CT fails to show the real margin of the substructures and a compensatory margin should be applied. The purpose of this study was to quantify the dynamic changes and the compensatory extension range by breath-hold and electrocardiogram gated 4-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging (4D-MRI), which had the advantage of discriminating soft tissues. Methods: Eventually, 15 patients with oesophageal or lung cancers were enrolled, including one female and nine males aged from 59 to 77 years from December 10th, 2018, to March 4th, 2020. The displacement of the heart and its substructures was measured through a fusion volume and the compensatory expansion range was calculated by expending the boundary on the planning CT to that of the fusion volume. The differences were tested through the Kruskal-Wallis H test and were considered significant at a two-side P<0.05. Results: The extent of movement of heart and its substructures during one cardiac cycle were approximately 4.0-26.1 millimetre (mm) in anterior-posterior (AP), left-right (LR), and cranial-caudal (CC) axes, and the compensatory margins should be applied to planning CT by extending the margins by 1.7, 3.6, 1.8, 3.0, 2.1, and 2.9 centimetres (cm) for pericardium; 1.2, 2.5, 1.0, 2.8, 1.8, and 3.3 cm for heart; 3.8, 3.4, 3.1, 2.8, 0.9, and 2.0 cm for interatrial septum; 3.3, 4.9, 2.0, 4.1, 1.1, and 2.9 cm for interventricular septum; 2.2, 3.0, 1.1, 5.3, 1.8, and 2.4 cm for left ventricular muscle (LVM); 5.9, 3.4, 2.1, 6.1, 5.4, and 3.6 cm for antero-lateral papillary muscle (ALPM); and 6.6, 2.9, 2.6, 6.6, 3.9, and 4.8 cm for postero-medial papillary muscle (PMPM) in anterior, posterior, left, right, cranial, and caudal directions, respectively. Conclusions: Periodic cardiac activity causes obvious displacement of the heart and its substructures, and the motion amplitude of substructures differs. Extending a certain margin as the compensatory extension to represent the organs at risk (OAR) and then limiting the dose-volume parameters could be performed in clinical practice.

The Association of Gross Tumor Volume and Its Radiomics Features with Brain Metastases Development in Patients with Radically Treated Stage III Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

PURPOSE: To identify clinical risk factors, including gross tumor volume (GTV) and radiomics features, for developing brain metastases (BM) in patients with radically treated stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: Clinical data and planning CT scans for thoracic radiotherapy were retrieved from patients with radically treated stage III NSCLC. Radiomics features were extracted from the GTV, primary lung tumor (GTVp), and involved lymph nodes (GTVn), separately. Competing risk analysis was used to develop models (clinical, radiomics, and combined model). LASSO regression was performed to select radiomics features and train models. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUC-ROC) and calibration were performed to assess the models' performance. RESULTS: Three-hundred-ten patients were eligible and 52 (16.8%) developed BM. Three clinical variables (age, NSCLC subtype, and GTVn) and five radiomics features from each radiomics model were significantly associated with BM. Radiomic features measuring tumor heterogeneity were the most relevant. The AUCs and calibration curves of the models showed that the GTVn radiomics model had the best performance (AUC: 0.74; 95% CI: 0.71-0.86; sensitivity: 84%; specificity: 61%; positive predictive value [PPV]: 29%; negative predictive value [NPV]: 95%; accuracy: 65%). CONCLUSION: Age, NSCLC subtype, and GTVn were significant risk factors for BM. GTVn radiomics features provided higher predictive value than GTVp and GTV for BM development. GTVp and GTVn should be separated in clinical and research practice.