Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Am J Obstet Gynecol ; 222(4S): S873-S877, 2020 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31794724

RESUMO

Public health workers, clinicians, and researchers have tried to increase long-acting reversible contraceptive (LARC) use by changing contraceptive counseling between patients and providers. Several major health organizations now recommend tiered-effectiveness counseling, in which the most effective methods are explained first so that patients can use information about the relative efficacy of contraceptive methods to make an informed choice. Some scholars and practitioners have raised concerns that, given histories of inequitable treatment and coercion in reproductive health care, tiered-effectiveness counseling may undermine patient autonomy and choice. This Clinical Opinion examines the development of tiered-effectiveness contraceptive counseling, how its rise mirrored the focus on promoting LARC to decrease the unintended pregnancy rate, and key considerations and the potential conflicts of a LARC-first model with patient-centered care. Finally, we discuss how reproductive justice and shared decision making can guide efforts to provide patient-centered contraceptive care.


Assuntos
Aconselhamento/métodos , Tomada de Decisão Compartilhada , Serviços de Planejamento Familiar/métodos , Assistência Centrada no Paciente , Coerção , Eficácia de Contraceptivos , Aconselhamento/história , Serviços de Planejamento Familiar/história , Comunicação em Saúde , História do Século XXI , Humanos , Contracepção Reversível de Longo Prazo , Autonomia Pessoal , Relações Profissional-Paciente , Direitos Sexuais e Reprodutivos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA